CC BY
27Phthalocyanines Фталоцианины
Шкрогэтароцмклы
http://macroheterocycles.isuct.ru
Review Обзор
DOI: 10.6060/mhc200710b
Hybrid Materials Based on Carbon Nanotubes and Polyaromatic Molecules: Methods of Functionalization and Sensor Properties
Tamara V. Basovaa@ and Maxim S. Polyakovb
aNikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
hSaint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 190005 Saint Petersburg, Russia
@E-mail: [email protected]
One of the most relevant ways to improve selectivity of sensors based on carbon nanotubes (CNT) is to create hybrid materials with polyaromatic molecules. The interest in hybrid materials is related to the synergistic effect that occurs when the properties of carbon nanomaterials (their one-dimensional electronic structure, high conductivity, large surface area) and properties ofpolyaromatic molecules (high sensitivity to analytes of different nature, reversibility of the sensor response) are combined. The creation of new porous three-dimensional carbon structures, in which polyaromatic molecules are linkers, is also of interest for creating functional carbon materials of a new generation. This review analyzes the current state of research in the field of hybrid materials based on carbon nanotubes and various polyaromatic molecules (derivatives of phthalocyanine, porphyrin, pyrene, coumarin, BODIPY, etc.) related to the problems of improving the sensitivity and selectivity of chemiresistive and electrochemical sensors. The first part of the review presents an analysis ofworks that describe various methods offunctionalization of carbon nanotubes with aromatic molecules, and examines their influence on the composition and structure of the resulting materials, as well as approaches to creating hybrid 3D structures based on CNTs. The second part of the review is devoted to the functional properties of hybrid materials with the main focus on the analysis of their sensor properties. Examples of the most successful application of hybrid materials as active layers of chemiresistive sensors for determining various gases in the environment are given. When considering the literature data, the main attention is paid to the analysis of the influence of methods of CNT functionalization with polyaromatic molecules on sensor properties. The third part of the review is devoted to the use of hybrid materials for the modification of electrodes of electrochemical sensors for the determination of various molecules in aqueous solutions and biological media.
Keywords: Hybrid materials, carbon nanotubes, metal phthalocyanines, polyaromatic molecules, chemiresistive sensors, electrochemical sensors.
Гибридные материалы на основе углеродных нанотрубок и полиароматических молекул: методы функционализации и сенсорные свойства
Т. В. Басова,а@ М. С. Поляков13
Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Институт неорганической химии им. А.В. Николаева Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук, 630090 Новосибирск, Россия
ьФедеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Санкт-Петербургский государственный архитектурно-строительный университет», 190005 Санкт-Петербург, Россия @Е-таИ: [email protected]
Одним из актуальных путей улучшения селективности сенсоров на основе углеродных нанотрубок (УНТ) является создание гибридных материалов с полиароматическими молекулами. Интерес к гибридным материалам связан с синергетическим эффектом, возникающим при комбинации свойств углеродных материалов
(их псевдоодномерная электронная структура, высокая проводимость, большая площадь поверхности) и свойств полиароматических молекул (высокая чувствительность к определяемым веществам различной природы, обратимость сенсорного отклика). Создание новых пористых трёхмерных углеродных структур, в которых полиароматические молекулы являются линкерами, также представляет интерес для создания функциональных углеродных материалов нового поколения. В настоящем обзоре проанализировано современное состояние исследований в области получения гибридных материалов на основе углеродных нанотрубок и различных полиароматических молекул (производных фталоцианина, порфирина, пирена, кумарина, BODIPY и др.), связанных с проблемами улучшения чувствительности и селективности адсорбционно-резистивных и электрохимических сенсоров. В первой части обзора представлен анализ работ, в которых описываются различные методы функционализации углеродных нанотрубок ароматическими молекулами и изучается их влияние на состав и структуру получаемых материалов, а также рассмотрены подходы к созданию гибридных 3D структур на основе УНТ. Вторая часть обзора посвящена функциональным свойствам гибридных материалов, при этом основное внимание уделяется анализу их сенсорных свойств. Приведены примеры наиболее успешного применения гибридных материалов в качестве активных слоев адсорбционно-резистивных сенсоров для определения различных газов в окружающей среде. При рассмотрении литературных данных уделяется внимание анализу влияния методов функционализации углеродных нанотрубок полиароматическими молекулами на сенсорные свойства. Третья часть обзора посвящена использованию гибридных материалов для модифицирования электродов электрохимических сенсоров для определения различных молекул в водных растворах и биологических жидкостях.
Ключевые слова: Гибридные материалы, углеродные нанотрубки, фталоцианинаты металлов, полиароматические молекулы, адсорбционно-резистивные сенсоры, электрохимические сенсоры.
Introduction
Hybrid materials play an important role in the development of nanotechnology due to the synergetic combination of properties of two or more components to create new types of functional materials with distinctive electrical, optical or mechanical properties.111 When considering a large family of nanocarbon materials, carbon nanotubes (CNT) are among the most attractive for the preparation of active layers of gas sensors due to their high conductivity, large surface area and adsorption capacity.[2]
Conductivity of semiconductor carbon nanotubes can change when different molecules adsorb on their surface. Strong electron acceptors (e.g. NO2) significantly increase the conductivity of CNTs by increasing the charge carriers, namely holes. On the other hand, reducing gases that are electron donors lead to a decrease of their conductivity due to recombination of electrons and holes. Currently, the sensor characteristics of CNTs towards various gases (e.g. NH3, NO2, CH4, SO2, H2S) and organic solvent vapours (e.g. etha-nol, acetone and chloroform) have been studied.[3-5] Another practical aspect of CNTs and their hybrid materials is their use for the modification of electrodes of electrochemical sensors.[6] The successful use of carbon nanotubes as sensitive layers has a number of limitations, including their low selectivity to analytes, long response and regeneration times, and low reproducibility. The latter may be because of the difficulty of reproducible deposition of homogeneous films due to the tendency of CNTs to uncontrollable aggregation in suspensions and, as a result, formation of bundles. One of the ways to overcome these limitations is to modify or functionalize carbon nanotubes using various functional groups, polymer or aromatic molecules. The interest in hybrid materials is due to the synergistic effect arising
from the combination of properties of carbon nanomaterials (their one-dimensional electronic structure, high conductivity, large surface area) and the properties of polyaromatic molecules (e.g. high sensitivity to analytes, reversibility of the sensor response). In addition, preparation of hybrid materials allows reducing uncontrolled aggregation of carbon nanotubes and obtaining fine dispersions in organic solvents for the deposition of uniform thin layer suitable for the study of their optical and electrical properties.
In recent years, several reviews summarizing data on hybrid materials on the basis of nanocarbon with organic derivatives have been published.[7,8] Most of them were devoted to the synthetic aspects of the functionalization of carbon nanomaterials, such as fullerenes, graphene, single-wall (SWCNT) and multi-wall (MWCNT) carbon nanotubes, with various molecules including polymers, phthalocyanines (MPc), and some others. The application of certain types of carbon-based hybrids for chemical sensing has also been mentioned in several works,[9] but they have not been generalized in a single review. For example, Lewandowski et al.[8] described the detection mechanisms of sensors on the basis of CNTs and their hybrids with porphyrins towards different gases (NH3, NO2, CO2, etc.) and volatile organic compounds (VOC), while Zhou et al.l9] summarized the data on application of noncovalently functionalized carbon nanotubes for the modification of electrodes of biosensors.
This review analyzes the state of research over the last ten years in the field of hybrid materials based on carbon nanotubes and various polyaromatic molecules (derivatives of phthalocyanine, porphyrin, pyrene, coumarin, BODIPY, etc.) related to the problems of improving the sensitivity and selectivity of chemiresistive and electrochemical sensors.
Methods of Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes by Polyaromatic Molecules
Noncovalent Functionalization
Noncovalent functionalization is one of the approaches for regulating the interfacial properties of nanotubes. It is based on supramolecular interaction using various adsorption forces, such as hydrogen and Van der Waals bonds, electrostatic forces, and n-stacking interaction. This approach does not require chemically aggressive media or harsh physical influences and is easier to implement than the covalent functionalization method. In addition, noncovalent func-tionalization does not lead to a violation of the electronic structure of initial carbon nanomaterials.[1011] The main disadvantage of noncovalent attachment is that the forces between the wrapping molecule and the nanotube may be weak, and the functionalization degree may be lower than in the case of covalent functionalization.[12]
rc-rc-Interactions play the most important role in noncovalent functionalization of CNTs with aromatic molecules. Woods et al.[13] studied the adsorption of benzene derivatives on SWCNT using density functional theory and found that the adsorption was mainly achieved by the interaction of p-orbitals of the benzene ring and those of the CNT. For this reason, organic molecules with extended aromatic system, e.g. pyrene,[14-17] porphyrin[1823] and phthalocya-nine[24-29] derivatives, are widely used for the modification of carbon nanomaterials due to their ability to form specific and n-n-stacking contacts between aromatic molecules and the graphite surface of CNT. Noncovalent function-alization of carbon nanotubes leads also to an increase of CNT solubility[30] and improvement of photoinduced electron transfer properties,[15'2431] sensing properties,[1732-35] mechanical and thermal properties,[1636-39] and catalytic effect. [40-41]
Several techniques of noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes are known. If aromatic compounds are soluble in water or organic solvents their hybrid materials are prepared by mixing their solutions with CNT dispersions in various solvents with or without ultrasonic treatment. Then the excess of adsorbed molecules is removed by washing in appropriate solvents.[42] If polyaromatic molecules (e.g. unsubstituted metal phthalocyanines) have low solubility their hybrid materials are prepared by noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes via mixing suspensions of carbon nanotubes and MPcs in dimethylformamide (DMF) or acetonitrile under ultrasonic treatment.[43] Another approach relies on in situ synthesis of phthalocyanine in the presence of carbon nanotubes.[44-48] Basiuk et al.[49] suggested a simple, efficient and environmentally friendly method of deposition of unsubstituted MPcs with M = Co, Ni, Cu and Zn onto CNT sidewalls, in which the function-alization was performed by heating SWCNT-MPc mixtures in a quartz reactor under moderate vacuum (10-2 Torr) at 400-500 °C. MPc was sublimed, part of it was adsorbed on the nanotube sidewalls, and the excess was condensed in the cooler part of reactor right above the edge of tube furnace. The MPc weight content in the prepared hybrids was determined by termogravimetric analysis (TGA) to be 30, 17 and 35 % for NiPc, CuPc and ZnPc, respectively.
The examples of application of the above mentioned techniques for the preparation of active layers of chemire-sistive and electrochemical sensors will be described in the corresponding sections below.
Covalent Functionalization
The main strategy of covalent functionalization has been described in a number of reviews[50-53] and book chapters.[54-57] CNTs tend to aggregate into bundles, which makes it difficult to disperse them in solvents. Thus,
Figure 1. Scheme of the main approaches to covalent functionalization of SWCNTs. Макрогетер0циmbl/Macroheterocycles 2020 13(2) 91-112
covalent functionalization of CNTs is widely used to increase the solubility of CNTs in solvents.[58-60] Covalent functionalization of CNTs can be achieved by introducing chemical functional groups using different reaction including fluorination, radical chemistry, reductive alkylation and arylation (Billups reactions), Bingel reaction, reactions with diazonium, nitrene, dichlorocarbene compounds. Authors of the review[61] provided a list of several covalent functionalization strategies. The most commonly used methods for functionalization of carbon nanotubes are shown in Figure 1. The covalent attachment of molecules is also carried out by click-chemistry or substitution reactions with the formation of amide, ether or peptide groups. Function-alization of single-wall carbon nanotubes via the addition of (R-)oxycarbonyl nitrenes was described by Holzinger and co-authors.[62] The suggested approach allows binding of a variety of different groups such as alkyl chains, aromatic groups, dendrimers, and others. For example, perfluoroary-lazide derivatives were used to modify carbon nanomateri-als in order to attach hydrophobic fluorosubstituted aromatic molecules to their surfaces.[63,64]
3D Materials Based on Carbon Nanotubes
Creation of new porous 3D carbon nanostructures cross-linked via different aromatic molecules is another important fundamental task of nanotechnology. To obtain such cross-linked structures, the same methods as for cova-lent functionalization of CNTs are used, but the aromatic molecule should contain two linking groups.
One ofthe methods used for the CNT binding is the Sono-gashira coupling reaction, namely, the cross-coupling reaction of vinyl and aryl halides with terminal alkynes, catalyzed by palladium and copper.[65] For instance, Kumar and Rao[66] performed covalent binding of iodobenzene functionalized SWCNTs via 1,4-diethylbenzene and 4,4'-diethynyldiphenyl linkers by the Sonogashira reaction (Figure 2). The Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) surface areas of these assemblies were 742 and 788 m2g-1, respectively, while the pristine SWCNTs had a surface area of 400 m2g-1.
Figure 2. Preparation of 3D hybrids by the Sonogashira reaction.
Leonard et al.[67] prepared 3D carbon nanotube frameworks for hydrogen storage. Cross-linking was performed according to the reaction between terminally substituted amine linkers (methylenedianiline) and SWCNT fibers in the presence of oleum (20 % free from SO3), sodium nitrite and 2,2'-azobis(2-methylpropionitrile) as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Cross-linking of SWCNTs using a methylenedianiline derivative.
Figure 4. Cross-linking of SWCNTs via the formation of amide
bonds.[40,41,68]
Nyokong and Mugadza obtained and investigated a series of 3D carbon nanomaterials with phthalocyanines of cobalt(II),[68] iron(II)[40] and nickel(II).[41] The materials were synthesized by cross-linking of carbon nanotubes by tetrasubstituted MPc via the formation of amide bonds (Figure 4).
For this purpose, COOH groups of carboxylated SWCNTs were transformed to COCl by their treatment with thionyl chloride (SOCl2) in anhydrous DMF at 70 °C for 24 h. Then the obtained SWCNT-COCl was refluxed with tetraamino-substituted CoPc in DMF during 96 h, and the resulting solid was centrifuged for 20 min, washed with ethanol and dried under vacuum. In another work,[69] SWCNTs, on the contrary, were functionalized by ethylene-diamine groups and entered into the reaction with a cobalt phthalocyanine derivative bearing COCl groups (CoTCOCl, Figure 5).
Ozden and co-workers[70] used the well-known Suzuki cross-coupling reaction[71] for the creation of 3D CNT networks. For this purpose, tetrakis(triphenylphosphine) palladium (Pd(PPh3)4) was added to 1,4-phenyldiboronic acid and anhydrous Cs2CO3 in anhydrous toluene, followed by CNT-COCl, in argon atmosphere (Figure 6). The reaction mixture was heated at 100 °C for 5 days, and then the resulting material was filtered and washed with water to remove
Figure 5. 3D hybrids based on SWCNTs and CoTCOCl.
CNT-COCI CNT-CO-Ph-CO-CNT
Figure 6. 3D CNT networks prepared according to the Suzuki cross-coupling reaction.
the excess of unreacted compounds. As a result, a carbon material with macrotubular architecture was obtained. CNT bundles were interconnected in a network, creating macro-porous structures. It was determined by the BET surface analysis that the specific surface area of the obtained 3D CNT-based structure was 177 m^g-1. Despite this porous morphology, this value was not much higher than that of pristine CNTs (166 m^g-1).
De Marco et al.[72] showed that 3D CNT hybrids could also be obtained by covalent linking of /»-diiodo-benzene and CNT by the addition of Na and naphthalene in ^,^-dimethylacetamide (DMAc) as a solvent (Figure 7). ^-Diiodobenzene was selected as a soluble, rigid, electro-philic cross-linking agent. The optimal metal concentration providing maximal debundling of CNTs and the grafting
Na I
Na
naphthalene DMAc Na •
Figure 7. Scheme of the cross-linking of CNTs by the reaction with />-diiodobenzene.
ratio of 17 wt% (determined by TGA) was shown to be 15 mM. The obtained 3D materials were found to have the enhanced specific surface area (766 m2g-1) estimated by BET (N2) measurements which is three times higher than in the case of pristine SWCNTs (217 m2g-1). The obtained materials had good electrical conductivity (9.4 Sm-1), low mass density (2.3 mgcm-3) and high chemical stability.
Schirowski et al.[73] prepared 3D structures by the reaction between negatively charged potassium intercalated SWCNTs and bisdiazonium salts (benzene-4,4'-bis(diazonium) or 1,1'-biphenyl-4,4'-bis(diazonium) salts) or diiodo compounds (^-diiodobenzene or ^-diiodobiphenyl) acting as electrophiles (Figure 8). It was shown that the functionalization of SWCNTs using diiodo compounds resulted in the better functionalization homogeneity and the higher degree of addend binding. The degree of functionalization
DIC-Ph 1 BDS-Ph* x 2 BF4
DICBiPh I BDS-BiPh- rv «2BF,
Scheme 1» Synthesis of biplienylene- and pheuyleue-linked SWCNTs via bisdiazonium salts (BDS) and diiodo compounds (I)K ) starting fi'om potassium nanotubides (K( ().
Figure 8. Synthesis of biphenylene- and phenylene-linked SWCNTs via bisdiazonium salts and diiodo compounds. Reprinted with permission from the American Chemical Society, Copyright (2018).[73]
was higher in the case of phenylene linkers, while biphenyl-ene linkers led to the higher surface area and better thermal stability. The authors also stated that the size of linkers, type of functionalization and its degree affected the macroscopic properties of the material. For example, SWCNTs cross-linked via biphenylene derivatives exhibited the 33 % higher external surface and the better kinetics of oxygen reduction in comparison with SWCNTs bound via phenyl linkers.
In a series of our research group, 3D hybrid materials based on SWCNTs and various polyaromatic linking molecules, viz. pyrene,[74] coumarin,[75,76] BODIPY,[77] and silicon phthalocyanine,[78] were prepared and studied. The hybrids were synthesized according to the well-known reaction of "click chemistry", namely azide-alkyne Huisgen cycloaddition (Figure 9). Azide-modified SWCNT-N3 were prepared in the nitrogen atmosphere by the addition of SWCNTs (0.4 mmol) to the mixture of NaN3 (6 mmol) and iodine monochloride (1.5 mmol) in 25 mL of acetonitrile. SWCNTs modified with azide groups react with a linking molecule bearing two terminal alkyne groups in the presence of a Cu(I) catalyst formed in situ from copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate and sodium L-ascorbate.
An interesting unusual method for the preparation of 3D CNT structures was proposed by Jombert el al.[79] Nanotubes were cross-linked by the ligand exchange reaction between cis-[Pt(dmso)2Cl2] and pyridine-functionalized single walled carbon nanotubes (Py-SWCNT) (Figure 10). Platinum was confirmed by XPS to coordinate the pyridine nitrogen atoms. It was shown that this type of coordination
did not have a significant effect on the conductance of Py-SWCNT films.
Hybrid Materials as Active Layers of Chemiresistive Sensors
Hybrid Materials on the Basis of Carbon Nanotubes and Metal Phthalocyanines
Electrical properties of SWCNTs are usually determined by their chirality, i.e. the angle of orientation of the graphite plane relative to the tube axis.[80,81] The electrical conductivity of semiconductor SWCNTs can alter upon adsorption of various molecules on their surface due to the change in the concentration of charge carriers in SWCNTs.[3,82] A prototype of the first sensor based on SWCNTs towards NO2 was described by Kong in 2000.[83] Later other researchers[5] found that thin SWCNT layers could be used to determine small (40-100 ppb) NO2 concentrations in dry air. To date, the sensor characteristics of pristine SWCNTs have been studied towards a number of gases such as NH3, NO2, H2, CH4, CO, H2S, and O2, as well as volatile organic vapours (VOC).
Phthalocyanine derivatives are widely used for the improvement of SWCNT chemiresistive sensor properties due to their semiconductor behaviour and good sensor response to various gases.[84-88] To date chemiresistive sensors on the basis of hybrid materials of CNTs with phtha-
Figure 10. Scheme of the synthesis of SWCNTs cross-linked via a Pt complex.
Table 1. Characteristics of hybrid sensor layers according to the data presented in Refs.[91,97,98]
Sensing Layers
Parameters
PhPc/ pbPc/
SWCNT- MWCNT- swcnt- mwcnt- swcnt CuPcTTMP/CuPcTIP/ mwcnt PbPc/ NlPc/ CuPc/
COOH COOH „„„„ „™тт SWCNT SWCNT MWCNT MWCNT MWCNT COOH COOH
Resistance, kOhm NH3 conc., ppm
Response at 20 ppm, % = 13
Recovery time at 20 ppm, s = 4000 LOD, ppb
Ref. [91]
5-7 10-2 0.4-0.5 0.4-0.5 0.15-80 0.15-80 0.15-80 = 13 = 16 2000 =1500 150
[91] [91]
16-20 5-7 10-2 0.2-0.3
0.15-80 0.15-80 0.15-80 =17 = 14 = 12
= 500 = 3000 = 250 150
[91] [97] [97]
0.2-0.3 0.4-0.5
0.15-80 0.3-80
= 15 = 13
=1000 =2000
[97]
[98]
0.3-80 = 13
[98]
0.3-80 = 18
[98]
1.0-1.5 0.3-80 = 25 = 250 75
[98]
locyanine derivatives have been widely studied in the literature,189-961 while the sensor properties of CNT/porphyrin hybrids have been described to a lesser extent.[20-23]
The literature analysis shows that a large number of works are devoted to the study of sensors towards ammonia. A group of Chinese scientists prepared hybrids of acid treated carbon nanotubes with MPc (M = Pb,[91] Cu,[97] Ni,[98] Co[99]) via non-covalent п-п-stacking interaction and studied their sensor properties towards ammonia. The researchers demonstrated that the hybrid materials PbPc/SWCNT-COOH and PbPc/MWCNT-COOH had the higher sensor response to NH3 than pristine carbox-ylated nanotubes (Table 1). They also showed the effect of the central metal on the sensor properties of investigated hybrids.[97-98] The hybrids with CuPc possessed the higher response towards ammonia than those with PbPc and NiPc (Table 1).
Liang et al.[95] prepared hybrid materials on the basis of MWCNTs and a number of tetrasubstituted phthalocya-nines TFPMPc (M = Co, Zn, Cu, Pb, Pd, and Ni) bearing tetrafluoropropyloxy substituents. The materials were obtained by mixing solutions of MPc in dimethylformamide with a suspension of nanotubes during ultrasonic treatment at 50 °C. Some sensor characteristics are given in Table 2. It was shown that the sensor response of TFPMPc/MWCNT layers to NH3 decreased in the following order: Co > Zn > Cu > Pb > Pd ~ Ni. This experimental result was in good correlation with the DFT calculations of the value of charge transfer between the analyte and MPc molecule. The TFPMPc/MWCNT hybrids exhibited noticeably higher sensitivity to ammonia than to CO, CO2, H2, CH4, and volatile organic compounds.
Wu et al.[99] compared sensor properties of the layers of CoPcTc/MWCNT (CoPcTc is tetra-ß-carboxyphthalocyaninatocobalt(II)) hybrid with the same hybrid mixed with ponyaniline (PANI) in the ration of 1:1. The last was shown to be the most sensitive to ammonia among the hybrids given in Table 2. The layer exhibited very fast recovery time (about 10 seconds at 20 ppm NH3) and low limit of detection (LOD) of 36 ppb.
Researchers from the groups of T. Basova and M. Durmuç used SWCNT-based hybrids prepared by the methods of non-covalent[27'29 100-104] and covalent[28] functionaliza-tion, as well as 3D hybrids for the creation of active layers of chemiresistive sensors to ammonia.[78] MPcs bearing long -S(CH2CH2O)3CH3 chains and pyrene substituents were used for non-covalent functionalization of SWCNTs (Figure 11a,b). SWCNTs functionalized with MPc bearing -S(CH2CH2O)3CH3 substituents gave fine stable dispersions in organic solvents, while pyrene substituents were introduced to improve n-n interaction between phthalocyanine molecules and nanotube walls.
ZnPc shown in Figure 11c was utilized for both cova-lent and non-covalent functionalization of SWCNTs. The functionalization degrees of SWCNTs by different phtha-locyanines, determined by TGA, and sensor characteristics are summarized in Table 3.
The functionalization degree of SWCNTs was shown to be a very important characteristic of hybrid materials with phthalocyanines, since the greater the degree of functionalization, the greater the sensor response. The method of covalent functionalization was found to lead to an increase in the functionalization degree by 1.5-2 times compared to the non-covalent one. The chemiresistive
Table 2. Characteristics of hybrid sensor layers according to the data presented in Refs.[95,99]
Sensing Layers
Parameters MWCNT TFPNiPc/ TFPPdPc/ TFPPbPc/ TFPCuPc/ TFPZnPc/ TFPCoPc/ CoPcTc/ MWCNT@ PANI(1:1) CoPcTc/
MWCNT MWCNT MWCNT MWCNT MWCNT MWCNT MWCNT
NH3 conc., ppm 0.1-200 0.1-200 0.1-200 0.1-200 0.1-200 0.1-200 0.1-200 0.2-250 0.2-250
Response at 25 ppm, % = 9 = 7 = 9 =9 = 14 = 15 = 18 = 59 = 22
Recovery time at 20-25 ppm, s = 700 = 250 = 300 = 500 = 250 = 500 = 500 = 10 = 250
LOD, ppb - - - - - - 60 36 -
Ref. [95] [95] [95] [95] [95] [95] [95] [99] [99]
ZnPc
Figure 11. Structures of MPcs (M=Co, Cu, Zn, 2H) used for functionalization of SWCNTs in Refs.P8-29-101!
Table 3. Degree of functionalization and sensor characteristics of SWCNTs modified with MPc molecules (Figure 11c).
MPc CuPc-py CoPc-py H2Pc-py ZnPc(tBu)4 ZnNc(tBu)4 ZnPc (Fig. 11c) ZnPc (Fig. 11c) SiPc-3D
Method Non-covalent Covalent
Ф, % 0.54 0.36 0.22 0.36 0.64 0.30 0.52 1.75
RhyB/RCNT - - - 3.0 8.4 2.8 5.2 14.0
Recovery time, s 60 30 40 30 40 70 70 200
Ref. [29] [29] [29] [27] [27] [104] [104] [78]
* Rhyb/Rcnt is the ratio of sensor response of SWCNT/MPc hybrid to that of pristine SWCNTs towards 50 ppm of ammonia.
sensor response of the layers of SWCNTs covalently functionalized with ZnPc was noticeably higher than that of SWCNTs noncovalently functionalized by the same phthalocyanine (Figure 12).
It was also concluded that the introduction of an additional aromatic substituent[101] or expansion of the aromatic system[27] when passing from phthalocyanine ZnPc(tBu)4 to naphthalocyanine ZnNc(tBu)4 complexes also causes an increase of the functionalization degree in the resulting
Figure 12. Sensor response of the layers of pristine SWCNTs and their hybrids obtained by covalent (ZnPc:SWCNT-co) and noncovalent (ZnPc:SWCNT-non-co) functionalization with ZnPc (Figure 11c) towards NH3 (10-50 ppm), measured in a dynamic regime at the constant Ar flow rate of 300 mL-min-1. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier S.A., Copyright (2017).[28]
hybrid materials and, as a consequence, an increase of their chemiresistive sensor response to ammonia.
Cross-linked carbon nanotubes, in which phthalocyanine molecules were used as linkers, were shown to be very attractive sensing materials for ammonia detec-tion.[78] For instance, a 3D hybrid SWCNT/SiPc was obtained by the azide-alkyne cycloaddition (Click) reaction of azido-substituted SWCNTs with axially-bis(propynoxy) phthalocyaninatosilicon(IV) (SiPc) (Figure 13). The prepared hybrid nanomaterial exhibited completely reversible sensor responses to ammonia and hydrogen at room temperature; the recovery time was 100-200 s in the case of NH3 and 50-120 s in the case of H2 depending on gas concentrations. Due to its porous structure, the LOD values reached 0.5 ppm and 70 ppm for ammonia and hydrogen, respectively. SWCNT/SiPc was successfully used for the detection of both NH3 and H2 in the presence of CO2. On the contrary, H2S was found to be an interfering gas for the NH3 detection.
CNT-based hybrid materials with phthalocyanines were also used for H2S detection. Wu and co-authors[105] prepared hybrid materials using acid treated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (aCNT) covalently bonded with cobalt(II) tetra-p-carboxyphenyloxyphthalocyanine (cPcCo) via the condensation reaction in the presence of Ж.Л-dicy-clohexylcarbodiimide (DCC), using hydroquinone (HQ), ^-aminophenol (PAP), and ^-phenylenediamine (PPD) as linking molecules, which were named cPcCo-HQ-aCNT, cPcCo-PAP-aCNT and cPcCo-PPD-aCNT, respectively. Among the investigated hybrids (Figure 14) the cPcCo-HQ-aCNT layer demonstrated the highest sensor response of 2.5 % to 80 ppb H2S with two linear ranges from 20
Figure 13. a: Scheme of the 3D hybrid SWCNT/SiPc; b: Dependence of the sensor response of a SWCNT/SiPc layer on NH concentration.[78]
Figure 14. A: Response of cPcCo, aCNT, cPc-HQ-aCNT, cPcCo-PAP-aCNT and cPcCo-PPD-aCNT sensors to H^S; B: The dependence of the sensor response of cPcCo, aCNT, cPc-HQ-aCNT, cPcCo-PAP-aCNT and cPcCo-PPD-aCNT on H2S concentration. Reproduced from Ref.[105] with kind permission of Royal Society of Chemistry.
to 160 ppb and from 320 to 2560 ppb, and a low detection limit of 5 ppb.
MPc/SWCNT hybrids can also be used for the detection of oxidizing gases like chlorine and NO2. There are several examples of hybrids obtained by noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes in the literature, which were used for this purpose, among them carboxylated MWCNT with Cu(II) 2,3,9,10,16,17,23,24-octakis(octyloxy)-29#,31# phthalocyanine (CuPcOC8),t106 107] carboxylated MWCNT with perfluorosubstituted ZnPcF16,[108] carboxylated SWCNT with MPcF16 (M=Co, Zn),[109] carboxylated SWCNT and MWCNT with CuPcF16.[110] A comparison of CuPcF16/ SWCNT-COOH (H1) and CuPcF16/MWCNT-COOH (H2) hybrids showed that the sensor response to Cl2 was higher in the case of H1 layers (Figure 15). The detection limits for H1 and H2 hybrids were reported to be 0.27 ppb and 0.85 ppb, respectively.[110] In the case of ZnPcF16/ MWCNT-COOH[108] the calculated LOD of Cl2 was even less and equal to 0.06 ppb.
The same group of authors[109] compared the sensor response of carboxylated SWCNT functionalized with
CoPcF , ZnPcF and CuPcF and shown that their sensor
16 16 16
response to Cl2 decreased in the order CoPcF16 > ZnPcF16 > CuPcF16, indicating that the central metal ion played an important role in the sensitivity to Cl2: the larger the ionic radius, the greater the charge transfer and Cl2 interaction
with the sensing layer. The calculated LOD was 0.04 ppb and 0.05 ppb for CoPcF16/SWCNT-COOH and ZnPcF16/ SWCNT-COOH hybrids, respectively.
Volatile organic compounds can be also detected using sensing layers of CNT-based hybrids with metal phthalocyanines. Ndiaye et al.[22] compared sensor properties of CNTs non-covalently modified with a phthalocyanine and porphyrins, viz. tetra-tert-butyl-29H,31 H-phthalocy-anine (CuPctBu), 2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octaethyl-21 H,23H-porphine (OEPH2), and 5,10,15,20-tetraphenyl-21H,23H-porphine (TPPH2), towards benzene, toluene and xylene. The amount of complexes adsorbed on CNTs estimated by TGA was maximal in the case of the hybrid with CuPctBu. The chemiresistive sensor responses of the hybrid materials were compared with those measured by a quartz crystal microbalance technique (QCM) (Table 4). It was shown that the maximal response to toluene, measured by both methods, was registered for CNT/CuPctBu layers. Similarly to the data obtained in works[27-29] the maximal sensor response was observed for the hybrids with the higher degree of functionalization.
Wang et al.[92] prepared and investigated the SWCNT/ CoPc hybrid exhibiting good selectivity and high sensor response to dimethyl methylphosphonate vapours (0.5-40 ppm). The hybrid was obtained via noncovalent functionalization of SWCNTs by tetrasubstituted cobalt
Figure 15. a: Sensor response of CuPcF16/SWCNT-COOH (H1) and CuPcF16/MWCNT-COOH (H2) hybrids to 1 ppm of Cl2 as a function of temperature; b: the typical resistance-time characteristics of H1 and H2 sensors for different concentrations of Cl2 (0.1-2 ppm) at 150 °C. Redrawn from Ref.[110]
phthalocyanine (Figure 16a). The mole rate of CoPc in the hybrid material was 0.42 %. The higher sensitivity of the hybrid layers to dimethyl methylphosphonate vapors than that of pristine SWCNTs (Figure 16b) was explained by the formation of hydrogen bonds between the dimethyl methylphosphonate molecule and fluorine-containing sub-stituents in CoPc macrocycle.
HybridMaterials on the Basis
of Carbon Nanotubes and Other Polyaromatic
Molecules
Apart from metal phthalocyanines other polyaromatic molecules are also widely used for the preparation of CNT-based hybrid materials. Calixarenes are very attractive compounds for the application in gas sensing using QCM and optical methods,[111] however their low conductivity prevents the creation of chemiresistive sensors. Preparation of hybrids on the basis of CNT and calixarenes allows overcoming this obstacle. Sarkar et al.[37112113] demonstrated that the formation of SWCNT/calixarene hybrids can be achieved due to the strong interaction between the SWCNTs and aromatic rings of calixarene. Calixarenes are characterized by a bowl-shaped structure with a cavity that has a hydrophobic pendent and the ability to adapt to changes from a close to flat conformation when interacting with analyte molecules. Consequently, the sensitivity of the sensor can be adjusted by manipulating the calixarene-analyte interaction by selecting the appropriate type of calixarene that has a different cavity size and/or different terminal functional groups.
Table 4. Mass and chemiresistive sensor responses of the sensing layers towards toluene (according to the data of Ref.[22]).
Mass sensor responses 103, Hzng-1 Resistive sensor responses 103 (AR/R0)
Sensor Layers 150 ppm 430 ppm 1200 ppm 150 ppm 430 ppm 1200 ppm
CNT NS NS NS NS NS NS
CNT/ CuPctBu 2.11 3.50 4.5 2.5 5.6 15.1
CNT/ OEPH2 1.55 3.04 4.0 2.0 3.5 7.1
CNT/ TPPH2 1.35 2.50 3.7 0.1 0.9 4.1
NS = not stable response
CoPc derivatives
Figure 16. a: Structural formula of CoPc and scheme of noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes; b: Dependence of the sensor response of pristine carbon nanotubes and SWCNT/CoPc hybrid on the concentration of dimethyl methylphosphonate. Reproduced from Ref.[92] with kind permission of Royal Society of Chemistry.
The chemiresistor was fabricated by dielectrophoretic alignment of carboxylated SWCNTs on interdigitated gold microelectrodes followed by functionalization of SWCNTs with calixarene (Figure 17) by a solvent casting technique. The prepared electrodes were used for the detection of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene vapors and exhibited LOD of 25, 7.5, 6.5 and 4 ppm, respectively.[37] The same SWCNT/calixarene hybrid was shown to exhibit the limit
Figure 17. Structure of calix[4]resorcinarene used for the preparation of chemiresistors.[37,112,113]
Figure 18. a: Structure of the Neural Red dye diazonium salt (NR); b: Selectivity histogram of the CNT NR hybrid. Drawn according to the data presented in Ref.[115]
of detection of ~0.6 ppm, ~0.3 ppm and ~0.4 ppm for NH3, trimethylamine and dimethylamine, respectively,11121 and 25 ppb for NO/13]
Wei et al.[114] reported about the preparation of 1-pyrene-methylamine functionalized SWCNTs for the active layers of a chemiresistive sensor for the detection of 2,4,6-trini-trotoluene in deionized water at ppt concentration level. Amino substituents in 1-pyrenemethylamine molecules attached to SWCNTs via n-n interaction selectively interact with trinitrotoluene with the formation of negatively charged complexes, which cause the conductivity change of the hybrid sensing layer.
Bensghaïera et al.[115] reported the functionalization of CNTs by the Neural Red dye diazonium salt (NR, Figure 18) through diazonium interface chemistry for the development of chemiresistive sensors towards acetone. It was shown that the Neural Red dye diazonium salt reacted spontaneously with the formation of C-C bonds with MWCNTs in water at room temperature.
The layers of the CNT-NR hybrid drop casted onto glass substrates with predeposited gold electrodes were used for the detection of different volatile organic compounds (ethanol, methanol, acetone and toluene). The layers were shown to exhibit highly selective sensor response towards 1000 ppm of acetone with the response/recovery time of 47 and 49 s at room temperature. Their selectivity to acetone was driven by the interaction between the N atom of electron donating dimethylamino groups of NR and electron deficient carbon atom in the C=O group of acetone.
Polyaromatic molecules can be also used as linking molecules for the creation of 3D structures of cross-linked carbon nanotubes. These structures were shown to have porous structure and developed surface area, which is important for the creation of chemiresistive sensors with high sensitivity. For example, Çenocak et al}14] prepared a SWCNT-Pyrene 3D hybrid material (Figure 19a) by the reaction of "Click chemistry" between SWCNTs functionalized with azide groups and 1,6-diethynylpyrene. The SWCNT-Pyrene 3D hybrid material exhibited completely reversible sensor towards low concentrations of ammonia (0.1-40 ppm) at
b
qNHHppm)
Figure 19. a: Structure of SWCNT-Pyrene 3D hybrid; b: Dependence of the sensor response of the films of SWCNT-Pyrene 3D and pristine SWCNT on ammonia concentration. Reproduced from Ref.[74] with kind permission of Elsevier S.A.
room temperature, which was noticeably higher than that of pristine SWCNTs. The surface area of the SWCNT-Pyrene 3D hybrid was shown by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method[74] to increase from 835 m2g-1 to 991 m2g-1 compared to pristine carbon nanotubes. LOD of SWCNT films was found to be 10 ppm while that of the 3D hybrid was 0.5 ppm.
Polyakov et al.[76] studied the effect of different types of functionalization of SWCNTs by 3-phenylcoumarin derivatives on the chemiresistive sensor response to ammonia. First two hybrids were prepared by the "Click" reaction between SWCNTs modified with azido groups and 7-propinyloxy-3-(^-propinyloxyphenyl)coumarin bearing two terminal alkyne groups (SWCNT/PhC2-3D) or with 7-propinoxy-3-(3',4',5'-trimethoxyphenyl)couma-rin bearing one terminal alkyne group (SWCNT/PhCl-cov) (Figure 20). The third hybrid material was prepared by noncovalent functionalization of SWCNTs, namely by adsorption of 7-propinyloxy-3-(p-propinyloxyphenyl) coumarin on SWCNT surface (SWCNT/PhC2-noncov). It was shown that the sensor response to ammonia increased in the order SWCNT/PhC2-noncov < SWCNT/PhC1-cov < SWCNT/PhC2-3D and was in good correlation with the amount of coumarin molecules attached to the surface of carbon nanotubes.
Hybrid Materials for Modification of Electrodes of Electrochemical Sensors
Hybrid Materials Based on Carbon Nanotubes and Metal Phthalocyanines for Modification of Electrodes of Electrochemical Sensors
CNTs were shown to improve the electron transfer rate when used for electrode modification, and even exhibit elec-
trocatalytic properties in some electrochemical processes. CNTs can cause a decrease in overpotentials and surface fouling on electrodes as well as an increase in voltam-metric signals.[6] On the other hand, metal phthalocyanines and related compounds are widely used as electron transfer mediators in electrochemical reactions and demonstrate electrocatalytic properties.[116117] Metal phthalocyanines adsorbed onto the surface of CNTs was shown to retain their catalytic properties.[26]
The literature abounds with various examples of obtaining hybrid materials based on carbon nanotubes and metal phthalocyanines and their application to modify the electrodes of electrochemical sensors, including review articles.[118] However, since this date, there has been a noticeable increase in the number of registered methods. The modified electrodes were manufactured primarily for the preparation of biosensors for drug detection and clinical purposes. In this chapter, we present examples of electrochemical sensors based on such hybrid materials obtained over the past decade, focusing on methods for the preparation of such hybrid materials and modification of electrodes of electrochemical sensors.
In some studies, carbon nanotubes are first covalently or noncovalently functionalized with phthalocyanines, and then the resulting hybrids are used to modify the electrode surface,[43119] while in most cases, the electrodes are first modified with carbon nanotubes, and then the MPc solution is dropped on the top of the carbon layer, followed by drying[120121] or the electrode is immersed in the MPc solution.[122] These methods are called "drop dry" or "dip dry" and are based on simple intermolecular forces, viz. electrostatic and n-n interactions. In many other works,[123 124] hybrid materials are obtained by mechanical mixing of CNT and MPc powders during their grinding in oil, and then this mixture is used to modify the electrodes. Some examples of the application of CNT/MPc hybrid
Figure 20. a: Scheme of the synthesis of hybrids material of SWCNT with 3-phenylcoumarin derivatives; b: Relative sensor response of the layers of pristine SWCNTs, azide-modified SWCNT-N3 and their hybrids towards NH3 (10-50 ppm). Reproduced from Ref.[76] with kind permission of Elsevier S.A.
materials for modification of electrodes of electrochemical sensors from the works published over the past 10 year are given in Table 5.
It is known that the redox potentials of phthalocya-nines can be more or less shifted anodically or cathodi-cally depending on the type of substituents, axial ligands and central metal ions. Literature analysis shows that phthalocyanines containing redox active metal centres are mainly used as electron mediators in hybrid systems, e.g. phthalocyanines of cobalt, copper, manganese and iron. Unsubstituted metal phthalocyanines are often utilized for the preparation of hybrid materials due to their availability and ease of synthesis. They have low solubility in organic solvents, for this reason their hybrid materials are usually prepared by noncovalent functionaliza-tion of carbon nanotubes via mixing of the suspension of carbon nanotubes and MPcs in DMF or acetonitrile under ultrasonic treatment.143 119 1241 Another method of the preparation of CNT-based hybrids is mechanical mixing of CNT and MPcs in the presence of oil or polymers (e.g. polypyrrole[125]). For example, Patrascu et al.[123] mixed MWCNT with FePc (1%) in paraffin oil in a mortar. The electrode modified with this mixture was used to determine dopamine by cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry. The detection limit of dopamine in water media was 2.0510-7 M. Electrodes modified with a composite material consisting of solid paraffin (mp 55 °C), MWCNT and unsubstituted CoPc mixed in a mortar were used to determine epinephrine (EP) in water and human urine samples. The detection limit in pure water was 15.6 nmolL-1 (2.86 |g-L-1).[94]
Zuo et al.[126] proposed another way to modify carbon nanotubes, which allows overcoming the low solubility of phthalocyanine. In their work, the CoPc-MWCNTs were synthesized in situ through tetramerization of dicyanoben-zene on the surface of MWCNTs in the presence of CoCl2 and DBU (1,8-diazabicycloundec-7-ene) in w-pentanol. The mixture was stirred at 170 °C under nitrogen for 2 h, then filtered, washed with ethanol and dried under vacuum. A glass carbon electrode (GCE) was modified by dropping CoPc-MWCNT suspension in ethanol and used for the detection of ascorbic acid in the range from 1.010-5 M to 2.610-3 M. The limit of detection was 1.010-6 M.
Tetrasulfonated metal phthalocyanines (MPc(SO3H)4) are also widely used as electron mediators in electrochemical sensors. Due to their solubility in water their hybrid materials are prepared by mixing their water solutions with CNT dispersions in water.[42,127-129] Karuppiah et al.[42] reported a simple sonochemical method to functionalize MWCNTs with nickel tetrasulfonated phthalocyanine, in which NiPc(SO3H)4 also served as a dispersing agent for the MWCNTs via n-n interactions.
Phthalocyanines bearing more complicated substitu-ents are also utilized for the preparation of hybrid materials by noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes for their further application for electrodes modification. For example, electrodes modified with MWCNT-based hybrids with 4-aminophenoxy-,[130] 4-oxy-3-methoxyphenylacrylic acid-[131] and 4-trifluoromethylphenoxy-substituted[132] phthalocyanines (Figure 21) were used for the detection of H2O2, bisphenol A and nitrite, respectively (Table 5).
HQ
,0"
O M^H) H2N<>O F3C-O0
Figure 21. Examples of tetrasubstituted metal phthalocyanines used for the preparation of MWCNT-based hybrids.1130-1321
CNT-based hybrid materials covalently modified with MPc derivatives are also of great interest for the modification of glass carbon electrodes. Covalent attachment of phthalocyanines to SWCNTs via formation of amide bonds is a quite popular method of covalent functionalization. For example, tetraaminosubstituted nickel phthalocyanine (NiPc(NH2)4) was shown to be covalently linked with SWCNTs modified with COCl groups with the formation of a 3D hybrid.[41] The prepared hybrid offered a distinct advantage, giving the higher current response at lower oxidation overpotentials to 2-mercaptoethanol compared to the electrode modified with a mixture of NiPc(NH2)4 and SWCNTs, and a low detection limit reaching 0.15 M. In the work,[135] carbon nanotubes, on the contrary, were modified with phenylamine groups and introduced into the reaction with CoPc bearing four COCl substituents. This hybrid was used to modify a GCE for the sensor towards diuron. The same CoPc was also used as a linker for the cross-linking of SWCNTs modified with ethylene amine groups, which were used to modify a glassy carbon electrode for its application for electrochemical detection of amitrole.[69]
One more hybrid was prepared by reaction between Co(II) phthalocyanine tetrasulfonyl chloride and SWCNTs modified with CONHCH2CH2NH2-groups[136] (Figure 22) in the presence of aniline. Screen-printed graphite electrodes (SPEs) modified with the prepared hybrid were shown to be used for the low-potential electrochemical oxidation of thiocholine. The linear range for thiocholine detection was 0.077-0.45 mM, while the LOD was 0.038 mM.
One more promising method of the preparation of hybrid structures is layer by layer (LbL) electrostatic assembly. In this method, the multilayered structures were fabricated directly by alternately assembling of negatively charged acid treated carbon nanotubes and cationic cobalt(II) tetra-p-(A,A,A-trimethylaminoethoxy)phtha-locyanine (Figure 23).[137] The electrode modified in this way was revealed to exhibit good reproducibility, stability, and selectivity when detecting 4-nitrophenol in the presence of NaNO2, resorcinol, paracetamol, and bisphenol A.
Zhang et al.[138] also described the preparation of multilayer films for the modification of a GCE. They used 2,9,16,23-tetra[4-(A-methyl)pyridinyloxy] phthalocyaninatocobalt(II) sulfate ([TMPyPcCo]4+) as the positively charged component and acid-treated multi-
Table 5. Examples of CNT/MPc hybrids used for the modification of electrodes of electrochemical sensors.
CNT/MPc Method of hybrid preparation Electrode and manner Analyte LOD, |M Ref.
of its modification
MWCNT/CoPc Mixture with high purity mineral GCE, adsorption Catechol 1.66 [133]
oil Immobilization of tyrosinase (+)-Catechin 6.32
MWCNT-COOH/CoPc Non-covalent functionalization GCE modified with gold nanoparticles Acetaminophen 0.135 [134]
MWCNT/CoPc Mixing dispersions in DMF AuNPTs/GCE, drop and dry Diethylstilbestrol 0.199 [43]
MWCNT/CoPc - Pyrolytic Graphite Electrode, drop and dry Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) 0.50 [119]
MWCNT/CoPc Mixing in a mortar with paraffin Solid paraffin/MWCNT/CoPc composite rod electrode Epinephrine 0.0156 [94]
MWCNT/MnPc Mixing dispersions in DMF GCE , drop and dry Catechol 0.096 0.048 [124]
Hydroquinone
Carboxylated MWCNT/PdPc Mixing CNT dispersion and PdPc solution in H2SO4 Casting of CNT/Pd in Nafion solution Rutin 0.075 [48]
MWCNT/FePc Mixing MWCNT with FePc (1%) in paraffin oil Preparation of solid paraffin/ MWCNT/FePc composite rod electrode Dopamine 0.205 [123]
MWCNT/CoPc In situ tetramerization of dicyanobenzene on MWCNT surface GCE, drop and dry Ascorbic acid 1.0 [126]
MWCNT-NH2/CuPc(SO3H)4 Mixing CNT dispersion and phthalocyanine solution in water GCE, drop and dry Dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid and uric acid 1-1000 [127]
MWCNT/Ni(SO3H)4 Non-covalent functionalization GCE, drop and dry Dopamine 1 nM [42]
MWCNT/Fe(SO3H)4 Non-covalent functionalization GCE, drop and dry Hydrazine 0.0076 [128]
MWCNT/Co(SO3H)4 Non-covalent functionalization GCE, drop and dry Glucose 0.14 [129]
SWCNT/nickel(II) tetra- Covalent functionalization GCE, immerse and dry 2-Mercaptoethanol 0.15 [41]
aminophthalocyaninate
SWCNT with phenyl-amine Covalent functionalization GCE, immerse and dry Diuron 0.18 [135]
groups/CoPc(COCl)4
SWCNT with ethylene amine Covalent functionalization GCE, immerse and dry Amitrole 0.1 [69]
groups/CoPc(COCl)4
SWCNT with Covalent functionalization Screen printed carbon Thiocholine 38 [136]
CONHCH2CH2NH2-groups/ electrode
Co(II)Pc(SO2Cl)4
MWCNT/Co(II) CoPc solution was dropped onto GCE, drop and dry Hydrogen 0.161 [130]
tetraaminophenoxy- GCE/MWCNT peroxide
phthalocyaninate
MWCNT-COOH/(E)-3- Non-covalent functionalization Pencil graphite electrode, Bisphenol A 0.0189 [131]
(2,9,16,23-tetrakis-(4-oxy-3- PGE/MWCNT was immersed drop and dry
methoxyphenyl)acrylic acid) into CuPc methanol solution
phthalocyaninatocopper(II)
MWCNT-COOH/tetrakis Non-covalent functionalization Pencil graphite electrode, Nitrite 0.062 [132]
(3-trifluoromethylphenoxy) drop and dry
phthalocyaninatocobalt(II)
MWCNT-COOH/ Layer by layer (LbL) electrostatic GCE, LbL assembly 4-Nitrophenol 0.2 [137]
[tmaePcCo]I4 (Figure 23) assembly method
MWCNT-COOH/ Layer by layer (LbL) deposition GCE, LbL assembly Nitrite, hydrogen 2.6 [138]
[2,9,16,23-tetra[4-(iV- peroxide
methyl)pyridinyloxy]
phthalocyaninatocobalt(II)
MWCNT/Zinc(II) Immobilization Spectroscopic grade graphite Glucose 18 [139]
2(3),9(10),16(17),23(24)-tetra of ZnPc on MWCNT surface rods, co-immobilization
(2-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl) in the conducting polymeric of GO and ZnPc x
phthalocyaninate(2-)-N29, matrix
N30, N31, N32
so2ci
Figure 22. Scheme of the modification of SWCNTs with cobalt phthalocyanine tetrasulfonyl chloride.11401
walled carbon nanotubes (aCNTs) as the negatively charged component for their deposition. It was shown that such electrode demonstrated excellent electrochemical sensitivity to NO2- and H2O2 with the linear ranges of 5 |M-30 mM and 10 |M-9 mM, respectively.
In addition to layer by layer (LbL) electrostatic assembly, deposition of Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) films of mixtures of a phthalocyanine and carbon nanotubes has been also proved to be a very useful method for the preparation of active layers of electrochemical sensors. Apetrei et al.[140] prepared mixed LuPc2/CNT LB films. For this purpose, they dissolved LuPc2 in chloroform and CNT in ethanol. The mixtures LuPc2/CNT were first mixed together to form a monolayer at the air-water interface. The solutions containing LuPc2/CNT were spread onto ultrapure water, kept at 20 °C and after complete evaporation of the solvent the floating molecules were compressed at a speed of 10 mmmin1 by two mobile barriers to obtain a n-A isotherm. The prepared LuPc2/CNT films were found to be promising for the detection of vanillic acid, pyrogallol, ascorbic acid, and catechin, due to the electrocatalytic effect induced by the electrode material, which was responsible for reducing the oxidation potential of these antioxidants.
Baba et al.[141] also prepared nanostructured CNT/ CuPc hybrid multilayers using layer-by-layer self-assembly approach. SWCNTs were modified with a water-soluble cationic alcian blue pyridine derivative and anionic copper phthalocyanine-3,4',4",4'"-tetrasulfonic acid tetrasodium salt, which were then utilized for electrostatic layer-by-layer multilayer fabrication (Figure 24). It was shown by cyclic voltammetry that electroactivity of such hybrid system was enhanced due to incorporation of SWCNTs.
Hybrid Materials Based on Carbon Nanotubes and Other Polyaromatic Molecules for Modification of Electrodes of Electrochemical Sensors
Apart from phthalocyanines other aromatic molecules are widely used for the preparation of hybrid materials which are applicable for the modification of electrodes, among them derivatives of pyrene,[142,143] anthracene,[143,144]
_4"
Figure 23. Cationic cobalt(II) tetra-P-(N,N,N-trimethylaminoethoxy)phthalocyanine ([tmaePcCo]4+I4-).[137]
BODIPY,[145] coumarin,[75] subphthalocyanine,[146] and some others. These polyaromatic molecules are mainly utilized for the noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes via n-n interaction. Many examples of hybrid materials obtained by non-covalent functionalization for their application in electrochemical biosensing were described in the review of Zhou and co-authors.[9] In this chapter, we give only a few examples of biosensors based on such hybrid materials obtained over the past decade to demonstrate the variety of the chemistry of polyaromatic molecules used to modify carbon nanomaterials.
Polyaromatic molecules can either have electrocatalytic properties themselves or be used to improve the immobilization of redox enzymes. For example, Ji et al.[147] modified a GCE with the hybrid material obtained by non-covalent functionalization of semiconducting SWCNTs with 1-doco-syloxylmethylpyrene. It was shown that the electrocatalytic activity of semiconducting SWCNTs was significantly improved after their functionalization. The prepared electrode was successfully utilized for simultaneous determina-
R =
Cl"
Na03S Cupg
N
AB
CuPS-SWCNT
AB-SWCNT
Figure 24. Schematic drawing of the fabrication of nanostructured alcian blue, pyridine variant (AB)-SWCNT/phthalocyanine-3,4',4",4'" tetrasulfonic acid tetrasodium salt CuPS-SWCNT LbL films. Redrawn from Ref.[141]
tion of guanine and adenine with LOD of 0.25 and 0.5 цМ, respectively. Reuillard with co-authors[142] used pyrene monomers bearing a boronic acid function (Figure 25A) for noncovalent functionalization of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in order to wire horseradish peroxidase (HRP) via the formation of covalent boronic ester bond with the glycosylated enzyme (Figure 25B). Then glucose oxidase (GOx) was immobilized, and the prepared bi-enzymatic system exhibited efficient bioelectrocatalytic oxygen reduction under physiological conditions.
Other pyrene derivatives, viz. 1-(2-anthraquinonylami-nomethyl)pyrene, 1-[bis(2-anthraquinonyl)aminomethyl] pyrene,[148] 1-pyrenemethyl anthracene-2-carboxylate and 1-pyrenyl anthracene-2-carboxylamide[143] were applied for the immobilization and orientation of laccase on the surface of the MWCNT-based hybrid. This approach led to high-performance biocathodes for oxygen reduction with the maximal current density of about 1 mAcm-2.
Song et al.[149] synthesized an anthracene-tetrathia-fulvalene derivative (Figure 26a) and immobilized it on single-wall carbon nanotubes through noncovalent side-wall functionalization. It was determined by differential pulse voltammetry that these hybrids interacted readily with DNA, which led to a noticeable decrease in the peak current, as well as to a positive shift of its peak potential. Thus, they may be promising materials for biomolecular recognition.
Quinone derivatives are known to show electro-catalytic ability for the reduction of O2 to H2O2 with an over potential much lower than that of the plain glassy carbon electrodes. Modification of MWCNTs with amino groups followed by linking with anthraquinone-2-carboxylic acid (Figure 26b) via carbodimide coupling was carried out by Tiwari et al.[144] Glassy carbon electrode covered with this hybrid exhibited an irreversible and good electrocatalytic activity for the reduction of oxygen.
Figure 25. A: Schematic representation of MWCNTs functionalized with pyrene derivatives; B: Schematic representation
of the functionalization of MWCNT electrodes with GOx and HRP for the reduction of O2 into H2O. Reproduced from Ref.[142] with kind
permission of Royal Society of Chemistry.
Carbon nanotubes can also be modified with naphthalene derivatives. For example, CNTs noncovalently modified with naphthalen-1-ylmethylphosphonic acid (Figure 26c) formed fine dispersions in water and exhibited good biocompatibility for immobilization of myoglobin proteins. [150] GCEs modified using this hybrid exhibited excellent bioelectrocatalytic activity towards H2O2 reduction.
Mao et al.[151] obtained a hybrid by functionalization of MWCNTs with 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6 -dione (Figure 26d), which was a good electron mediator in the process of NADH oxidation. An amperometric sensor based on a GCE modified with the obtained hybrid demonstrated high sensitivity (8.77 |AmM-1) of the detection of NADH under the potential of 0.0 V with minimal interference. The hybrid was also employed as a bioplatform, in which alcohol dehy-drogenase was immobilized for the fabrication of ethanol biosensors. The resulting bioplatform demonstrated a LOD of ethanol of 0.30 mM.
Apart from organic aromatic molecules, there are several examples of CNT-based hybrid materials with metal complexes with aromatic ligands in the literature, e.g. [Mn(CH3COO)(CH3OH)2(pyterpy)]ClO4, (pyterpy = 4'-(4-pyridyl)-2,2':6',2''-terpyridine)[152] and bis[5-((4-
ndecyloxyphenyl)azo)-A-(nethanol)-salicylaldiminato] copper(II).[153] The immobilization of transition metal complexes onto carbon nanotubes increased the catalytic activity of the modified surfaces. The manganese complex was shown to be a good mediator in the reaction of electrocatalytic oxidation of hydrazine and its hybrid with MWCNT was used for the determination of hydrazine with a detection limit of 0.50 | M. The hybrid of MWCNT with the copper(II) complex exhibited the electrocatalytic activity towards oxidation of L-cysteine.
The literature describes examples of using aromatic molecules both for covalent modification of carbon nanotubes and as linkers for creating their 3D structures. The developed surface and ability of 3D materials to incorporate electroactive molecules into the porous matrix make them very attractive for the application in electrochemical sensors. §enocak et al.[146] obtained a SWCNT-based hybrid by the "click" reaction between SWCNTs with azide groups and subphthalocyanine (SubPc) bearing terminal ethynyl groups (Figure 27). The SWCNT/SubPc hybrid deposited on the surface of a GCE demonstrated a good response to catechin in the concentrtation range from 0.1-1.5 ^M with the detection limit of 43 nM. The electrode modified
NaOOC
NaOOC'
XKT
sch2ch2o—<
Figure 26. Examples of polyaromatic molecules used for the preparation of CNT-based hybrid materials.
SWCNT-BODIPY
Figure 27. Scheme of the preparation of SWCNT/BODIPY and SWCNT/SubPc hybrids.^ Макрогетер0циmbl/Macroheterocycles 2020 13(2) 91-112
with SWCNT/SubPc exhibited good reproducibility, stability and sensitivity to catechin in real samples of green, fruit, and black tea.
Sariogullari et al.[77] modified SWCNTs with BODIPY derivatives containing terminal ethynyl groups (Figure 27) via the "click" reaction. The prepared hybrid was used for the detection of guanine and adenine in water solutions by the method of differential pulse voltammetry in the presence of ascorbic acid and caffeine and various ions (Cr3+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Ca2+, Mg2+, SO42-, NO3- and Cl-). The detection limits of guanine and adenine were shown to be 1.07 and 6.21 ^M, respectively.
Authors of another work[145] used 4,4-difluoro-8-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2,6-diethynyl-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene having double terminal ethynyl groups as a linker for the preparation of a 3D hybrid
(3D SWCNT-BODIPY; Figure 28). The prepared 3D hybrid was deposited onto a glassy carbon electrode for the detection of eserine in the range of 0.25-2.25 ^M by the square wave voltammetry (SWV) with the detection limit of 160 nM. The hybrid material exhibited very high selectivity towards ezerine without immobilization of any enzymes due to the similarity of the reaction mechanism to that of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) enzymatic
reaction.[154]
One more example of the application of 3D hybrid for modification of electrodes of electrochemical sensors was described by §enocak et al.[75] The authors performed a "Click" reaction to attach 7-propinyloxy-3-(p-propi-nyloxyphenyl)coumarin containing two terminal ethynyl groups to SWCNTs preliminarily modified with azide groups (Figure 29). GCEs modified with the prepared 3D
Figure 28. Scheme of the SWCNT-BODIPY 3D hybrid material. Reproduced from Ref.[145] with kind permission of Elsevier S.A.
Coum
Figure 29. Scheme of the SWCNT-coumarin hybrid material.[75]
SWCNT-Coumarine hybrid material were used for the determination of quercetin antioxidant in water and tea; the sensor linear range was from 0.25 to 3 дМ, while the detection and quantification limits of quercetin in water were found to be 20 nM and 66 nM, respectively.
Conclusions
An overview of the state of research over the last ten years in the field of hybrid materials based on carbon nanotubes and various polyaromatic molecules (derivatives of phthalocyanine, porphyrin, pyrene, coumarin, BODIPY, etc) was provided in this review. Due to the synergistic effect arising from the combination of properties of carbon nanomaterials and polyaromatic molecules the hybrid materials are widely used as active layers of chemiresistive layers and for the modification of electrodes of electrochemical sensors. For the preparation of active layers of chemiresis-tive gas sensors the hybrid materials are obtained by both covalent and noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes with polyaromatic molecules. The functionalization degree is a very important characteristic of hybrid materials because the value of sensor response was found to be in good correlation with the degree of functionalization of SWCNTs with polyaromatic molecules. n-n-Interaction plays an important role in noncovalent functionaliza-tion of CNTs with aromatic molecules. It was shown that the expansion of aromatic system of molecules using for CNT functionalization led to an increase in the function-alization degree and, as a consequence, to an increase in sensitivity of the hybrid sensing layer. Covalent func-tionalization, and especially the creation of cross-linked 3D structures, can also enhance the degree of functionalization and sensor performance of carbon nanotubes.
The literature abounds with various examples of application of hybrid materials based on carbon nanotubes and polyaromatic molecules to modify the electrodes of electrochemical sensors. Various methods are used for the preparation of modified electrodes, among them mixing the solid components in the presence of oil or polymers in a mortar to fabricate rod electrodes, covalent or noncova-lent functionalization of CNTs with the subsequent deposition of the resulted hybrid dispersion onto the electrode, layer-by-layer (LbL) electrostatic assembly and Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) techniques. All these methods have their own advantages and limitations and are determined by the structure and properties of polyaromatic molecules, as well as by analytical tasks. Noncovalent functionalization of CNTs allows to preserve the original mechanical and electronic properties of CNTs and their intrinsic properties with desirable functionality, while covalent functionalization helps to prevent leaching of the electroactive component that was used to modify CNTs.
Polyaromatic molecules are widely used as linking molecules for the creation of 3D structures of cross-linked carbon nanotubes. Such 3D structures were shown to have porous structure and developed surface area, which makes them very attractive materials for the creation of both chemiresistive and electrochemical sensors with high sensitivity.
Acknowledgements. The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 19-13-50124.
References
1. Said R.A.M., Hasan M.A., Abdelzaher A.M., Abdel-Raoof A.M. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167,037549. doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ab697b.
2. Gupta V.K., Saleh T.A. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20, 2828-2843. 10.1007/s11356-013-1524-1. doi:10.1007/s11356-013-1524-1.
3. Zhang T., Mubeen S., Myung N. V, Deshusses M.A. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 332001. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/19/33/332001.
4. Bonegardt D., Klyamer D., Köksoy B., Durmu§ M., Basova T. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 11021-11028. doi: 10.1007/s10854-020-03650-x.
5. Li J., Lu Y., Ye Q., Cinke M., Han J., Meyyappan M. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 929-933. doi:10.1021/nl034220x.
6. Deshmukh M.A., Jeon J.-Y., Ha T.-J. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 150, 111919. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111919.
7. §enocak A., Demirba§ E., Durmu§ M. Phthalocyanine-Nanocarbon Materials and Their Composites: Preparation, Properties, and Applications. In: Nanocarbon and Its Composites (Khan A., Jawaid M., Asiri I.A., Eds.) Elsevier, 2019. pp. 677-709. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102509-3.00023-7.
8. Orzechowska S., Mazurek A., Swislocka R., Lewandowski W. Materials (Basel). 2019, 13, 80. doi:10.3390/ma13010080.
9. Zhou Y., Fang Y., Ramasamy R. Sensors 2019, 19, 392. doi:10.3390/s19020392.
10. Kim, Li H. Fabrication and Applications of Carbon Nanotube-Based Hybrid Nanomaterials by Means of Non-Covalently Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes. In: Carbon Nanotubes -From Research to Applications (Bianco S., Ed.) InTech, 2011. doi:10.5772/18002.
11. Li H., Song S.I., Song G.Y., Kim I. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2014, 14, 1425-1440. doi:10.1166/jnn.2014.9048.
12. Liu P. Eur. Polym. J. 2005, 41, 2693-2703. doi:10.1016/j. eurpolymj.2005.05.017.
13. Woods L.M., Bädescu §.C., Reinecke T.L. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 75, 155415. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.155415.
14. Li X., Liu Y., Fu L., Cao L., Wei D., Wang Y. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 2431-2437. doi:10.1002/adfm.200600339.
15. Blaudeck T., Preuß A., Scharf S., Notz S., Kossmann A., Hartmann S., Kasper L., Mendes R.G., Gemming T., Hermann S., Lang H., Schulz S.E. Phys. Stat. Sol. 2019, 216, 1900030. doi:10.1002/pssa.201900030.
16. Scherr J., Neuhaus A., Parey K., Klusch N., Murphy B.J., Zickermann V., Kühlbrandt W., Terfort A., Rhinow D. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 7185-7190. doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b02651.
17. Parra E.J., Rius F.X., Blondeau P. Analyst 2013, 138, 2698. doi:10.1039/c3an00313b.
18. Hecht D.S., Ramirez R.J.A., Briman M., Artukovic E., Chichak K.S., Stoddart J.F., Grüner G. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 2031-2036. doi:10.1021/nl061231s.
19. Rahman G.M.A., Guldi D.M., Campidelli S., Prato M. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 62-65. doi:10.1039/b515394h.
20. Rushi A., Datta K., Ghosh P., Mulchandani A., Shirsat M. Phys. status solidi 2018, 1700956. doi:10.1002/pssa.201700956.
21. Saxena S., Saini G.S.S., Verma A.L. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2015, 38, 443-449. doi:10.1007/s12034-015-0864-5.
22. Ndiaye A., Bonnet P., Pauly A., Dubois M., Brunet J., Varenne C., Guerin K., Lauron B. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 20217-20228. doi:10.1021/jp402787f.
2 3. Pauly A., Brunet J., Varenne C., Ndiaye A.L. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2019, 298, 126768. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2019.126768.
24. Bartelmess J., Ballesteros B., de la Torre G., Kiessling D., Campidelli S., Prato M., Torres T., Guldi D.M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 16202-16211. doi:10.1021/ja107131r.
25. Chitta R., Sandanayaka A.S.D., Schumacher A.L., D'Souza L., Araki Y., Ito O., D'Souza F. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 6947-6955. doi:10.1021/jp0704416.
26. Wang X., Liu Y., Qiu W., Zhu D. J. Mater. Chem. 2002, 12, 1636-1639. doi:10.1039/b201447e.
27. Polyakov M.S., Basova T.V. Macroheterocycles 2017, 10, 31-36. doi:10.6060/mhc161176p.
28. Polyakov M.S., Basova T.V., Göksel M., §enocak A., Demirba§ E., Durmu§ M., Kadem B., Hassan A. Synth. Met. 2017, 227, 78-86. doi:10.1016/j.synthmet.2017.02.024.
29. Kaya E.N., Basova T., Polyakov M., Durmu§ M., Kadem B., Hassan A. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 91855-91862. doi:10.1039/c5ra18697h.
30. Guldi D.M., Rahman G.M.A., Jux N., Balbinot D., Hartnagel U., Tagmatarchis N., Prato M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9830-9838. doi:10.1021/ja050930o.
31. Hatton R.A., Blanchard N.P., Miller A.J., Silva S.R.P. Phys. E Low-dimensional Syst. Nanostructures 2007, 37, 124-127. doi:10.1016/j.physe.2006.07.001.
32. Sun Q., Wu Z., Cao Y., Guo J., Long M., Duan H., Jia D. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 297, 126689. doi:10.1016/j. snb.2019.126689.
33. Agarwal P.B., Alam B., Sharma D.S., Sharma S., Man-dal S., Agarwal A. Flex. Print. Electron. 2018, 3, 035001. doi:10.1088/2058-8585/aacc8f.
34. Das M., Ghosh S., Roy S. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 6918-6931. doi:10.1039/C8NJ00288F.
35. Wang Y., Akhigbe J., Ding Y., Brückner C., Lei Y. Electro-analysis 2012, 24, 1348-1355. doi:10.1002/elan.201200077.
36. Chen C., Li X., Wen Y., Liu J., Li X., Zeng H., Xue Z., Zhou X., Xie X. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2019, 125, 105517. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105517.
37. Santos D.F., Carvalho A.P.A., Soares B.G. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 2077-2089. doi:10.1007/s10853-019-04147-7.
38. Zheng J., Zong Y., Zhao G., Yu Z., Wang M., Zhu C., Li C., Liu J., Gui D. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2020, 98, 102457. doi:10.1016/j. ijadhadh.2019.102457.
39. Park M., Lee H., Jang J., Park J.H., Kim C.H., Kim S.Y., Kim J. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2019, 177, 96-102. doi:10.1016/j. compscitech.2019.04.021.
40. Mugadza T., Nyokong T. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 2606-2613. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2009.12.051.
41. Mugadza T., Nyokong T. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 6049-6057. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2010.05.065.
42. Karuppiah C., Devasenathipathy R., Chen S., Arulraj D., Palanisamy S., Mani V., Vasantha V.S. Electroanalysis 2015,
27, 485-493. doi:10.1002/elan.201400551.
43. Aragao J.S., Ribeiro F.W.P., Portela R.R., Santos V.N., Sousa C.P., Becker H., Correia A.N., de Lima-Neto P. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 239, 933-942. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2016.08.097.
44. Xu Z., Li H., Sun H., Zhang Q., Li K. Chinese J. Chem. 2010,
28, 2059-2066. doi:10.1002/cjoc.201090344.
45. Li H., Xu Z., Li K., Hou X., Cao G., Zhang Q., Cao Z. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 1181-1186. doi:10.1039/C0JM02156C.
46. Wang Z., Yang X., Wei J., Xu M., Tong L., Zhao R., Liu X. J. Polym. Res. 2012, 19, 9969. doi:10.1007/s10965-012-9969-3.
47. Chen F.Y., Li K.Z., Li H.J. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 706-708, 15-19. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.706-708.15.
48. Xing R., Yang H., Li S., Yang J., Zhao X., Wang Q., Liu S., Liu X. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2017, 21, 1219-1228. doi:10.1007/s10008-016-3447-5.
49. Basiuk V.A., Flores-Sánchez L.J., Meza-Laguna V., Flores-Flores J.O., Bucio-Galindo L., Puente-Lee I., Basiuk E.V. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 436, 1123-1133. doi:10.1016/j. apsusc.2017.12.122.
50. Mallakpour S., Soltanian S. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 109916-109935. doi:10.1039/C6RA24522F.
51. Ma P.-C., Siddiqui N.A., Marom G., Kim J.-K. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2010, 41, 1345-1367. doi:10.1016/j. compositesa.2010.07.003.
52. Speranza G. C - J. Carbon Res. 2019, 5, 84. doi:10.3390/ c5040084.
53. Balasubramanian K., Burghard M. Small 2005, 1, 180-192. doi:10.1002/smll.200400118.
54. Jeon I.-Y., Wook D., Ashok N., Baek J.-B. Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes. In: Carbon Nanotubes - Polymer Nanocomposites (Yellampalli S., Ed.) InTech, 2011. doi:10.5772/18396.
55. Das R. Nanohybrid Catalyst Based on Carbon Nanotube. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. 143 p. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58151-4.
56. Hauke F., Hirsch A. Covalent Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes. In: Carbon Nanotubes and Related Structures (Guldi D.M., Martin N., Eds.) Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2010. p. 135-198. doi:10.1002/9783527629930.ch6.
57. Basha J. Applications of Functionalized Carbon-Based Nano-materials. In: Chemical Functionalization of Carbon Nano-materials (Thakur V.K., Thakur M.K., Eds.) Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2015. pp. 572-587. doi:10.1201/b18724-26.
58. Setaro A., Adeli M., Glaeske M., Przyrembel D., Bisswanger T., Gordeev G., Maschietto F., Faghani A., Paulus B., Weinelt M., Arenal R., Haag R., Reich S. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14281. doi:10.1038/ncomms14281.
59. He N., Chen Y., Bai J., Wang J., Blau W.J., Zhu J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 13029-13035. doi:10.1021/jp9006813.
60. Boul P., Liu J., Mickelson E., Huffman C., Ericson L., Chiang I., Smith K., Colbert D., Hauge R., Margrave J., Smalley R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 310, 367-372. doi:10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00713-7.
61. Dyke C.A., Tour J.M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 1115111159. doi:10.1021/jp046274g.
62. Holzinger M., Abraham J., Whelan P., Graupner R., Ley L., Hennrich F., Kappes M., Hirsch A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8566-8580. doi:10.1021/ja029931w.
63. Pastine S.J., Okawa D., Kessler B., Rolandi M., Llorente M., Zettl A., Frechet J.M.J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4238-4239. doi:10.1021/ja8003446.
64. Park J., Yan M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 181-189. doi:10.1021/ ar300172h.
65. Sonogashira K., Tohda Y., Hagihara N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 16, 4467-4470. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)91094-3.
66. Kumar R., Rao C.N.R. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 6747-6750. doi:10.1039/c5ta00163c.
67. Leonard A.D., Hudson J.L., Fan H., Booker R., Simpson L.J., O'Neill K.J., Parilla P.A., Heben M.J., Pasquali M., Kittrell C., Tour J.M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 723-728. doi:10.1021/ ja806633p.
68. Mugadza T., Nyokong T. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 6347-6353. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2009.05.074.
69. Mugadza T., Nyokong T. Synth. Met. 2010, 160, 2089-2098. doi:10.1016/j.synthmet.2010.07.036.
70. Ozden S., Narayanan T.N., Tiwary C.S., Dong P., Hart A.H.C., Vajtai R., Ajayan P.M. Small 2015, 11, 688-693. doi:10.1002/ smll.201402127.
71. Miyaura N., Suzuki A. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1979, 866-867. doi:10.1039/C39790000866.
72. De Marco M., Markoulidis F., Menzel R., Bawaked S.M., Mokhtar M., Al-Thabaiti S.A., Basahel S.N., Shaffer M.S.P. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 5385-5389. doi:10.1039/c5ta10311h.
73. Schirowski M., Abellan G., Nuin E., Pampel J., Dolle C., Wedler V., Fellinger T.-P., Spiecker E., Hauke F., Hirsch A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 3352-3360. doi: 10.1021/ jacs.7b12910.
74. Çenocak A., Göl C., Basova T. V, Demirbaç E., Durmu§ M., Al-Sagur H., Kadem B., Hassan A. Sens. Actuators, B Chem. 2018, 256, 853-860. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2017.10.012.
75. Çenocak A., Köksoy B., Demirbaç E., Basova T., Durmu§ M. Sens. Actuators, B Chem. 2018, 267, 165-173. doi:10.1016/j. snb.2018.04.012.
76. Polyakov M.S., Ivanova V.N., Basova T.V., Saraev A.A., Köksoy B., Çenocak A., Demirbaç E., Durmu§ M. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 504, 144276. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144276.
77. Sariogullari H., Çenocak A., Basova T., Demirbaç E., Durmu§ M. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 840, 10-20. doi:10.1016/j. jelechem.2019.03.045.
78. Polyakov M., Ivanova V., Klyamer D., Köksoy B., Çenocak A., Demirbaç E., Durmu§ M., Basova T. Molecules 2020, 25, 2073. doi:10.3390/molecules25092073.
79. Jombert A.S., Bayazit M.K., Coleman K.S., Zeze D.A. Chem-NanoMat 2015, 1, 353-358. doi:10.1002/cnma.201500035.
80. Treacy M.M.J., Ebbesen T.W., Gibson J.M. Nature 1996, SS1, 678-680. doi:10.1038/381678a0.
81. Zhang W., Zhu Z., Wang F., Wang T., Sun L., Wang Z. Nanotechnology 2004, 15, 936-939. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/15/8/010.
82. Travlou N.A., Bandosz T.J. Carbon N. Y. 2017, 121, 114-126. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2017.05.081.
83. Kong J., Franklin N.R., Zhou C., Chapline M.G., Peng S., Cho K., Dai H. Science 2000, 287, 622-625. doi:10.1126/sci-ence.287.5453.622.
84. Valli L. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 116, 13-44. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2005.04.008.
85. Gülmez A.D., Polyakov M.S., Volchek V.V., Kostakoglu S.T., Esenpinar A.A., Basova T.V., Durmuç M., Gürek A.G., Ahsen V., Banimuslem H.A., Hassan A.K. Sens. Actuators, B Chem. 2017, 241, 364-375. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2016.10.073.
86. Singh A., Samanta S., Kumar A., Debnath A.K., Prasad R., Veerender P., Balouria V., Aswal D.K., Gupta S.K. Org. Electron. 2012, 1S, 2600-2604. doi:10.1016/j.orgel.2012.07.022.
87. Parra V., Rei Vilar M., Battaglini N., Ferraria A.M., Botelho do Rego A.M., Boufi S., Rodríguez-Méndez M.L., Fonavs E., Muzikante I., Bouvet M. Langmuir 2007, 2S, 3712-3722. doi: 10.1021/la063114i.
8 8. Kumar A., Brunet J., Varenne C., Ndiaye A., Pauly A. Procedia Eng. 2015, 120, 594-597. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.735.
89. Verma A.L., Saxena S., Saini G.S.S., Gaur V., Jain V.K. Thin Solid Films 2011, 519, 8144-8148. doi:10.1016/j. tsf.2011.06.034.
90. Jha P., Sharma M., Chouksey A., Chaturvedi P., Kumar D., Upadhyaya G., Rawat J.S.B., Chaudhury P. Synth. React. Inorganic, Met. Nano-Metal Chem. 2014, 44, 1551-1557. doi: 10.1080/15533174.2013.818021.
91. Wang B., Zhou X., Wu Y., Chen Z., He C. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 171-172, 398-404. doi:10.1016/j. snb.2012.04.084.
92. Wang Y., Hu N., Zhou Z., Xu D., Wang Z., Yang Z., Wei H., Kong E.S.-W., Zhang Y. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 3779-3787. doi:10.1039/c0jm03567j.
93. Pillay J., Ozoemena K.I. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 5053-5059. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2008.12.056.
94. Moraes F.C., Golinelli D.L.C., Mascaro L.H., Machado S.A.S. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 14S, 492-497. doi:10.1016/j. snb.2010.05.005.
95. Liang X., Chen Z., Wu H., Guo L., He C., Wang B., Wu Y. Carbon N. Y. 2014, 80, 268-278. doi:10.1016/j. carbon.2014.08.065.
96. Chidawanyika W., Nyokong T. Carbon N. Y. 2010, 4S, 2831-2838. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2010.04.015.
97. Wang B., Wu Y., Wang X., Chen Z., He C. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 190, 157-164. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2013.08.066.
98. Kang D., Wang B., Wang X., Li Y., Chen Z., He C., Wu Y. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 246, 262-270. doi:10.1016/j. snb.2017.02.083.
99. Wu H., Chen Z., Zhang J., Wu F., He C., Wu Y., Ren Z. J.Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 24493-24501. doi:10.1039/C7TA07443C.
100. Banimuslem H., Hassan A., Basova T., Gülmez A.D., Tuncel S., Durmu§ M., Gürek A.G., Ahsen V. Sens. Actuators, B Chem. 2014, 190, 990-998. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2013.09.059.
101. Kaya E.N., Tuncel S., Basova T.V., Banimuslem H., Hassan A., Gürek A.G., Ahsen V., Durmuç M. Sens. Actuators, B Chem. 2014, 199, 277-283. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2014.03.101.
102. Tuncel S., Kaya E.N., Durmu? M., Basova T., Gürek A.G., Ahsen V., Banimuslem H., Hassan A. Dalt. Trans. 2014, 43, 4689-4699. doi:10.1039/c3dt52736k.
103. Banimuslem H., Hassan A., Basova T., Esenpinar A.A., Tuncel S., Durmuç M., Gürek A.G., Ahsen V. Sens. Actuators, B Chem. 2015, 207, 224-234. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2014.10.046.
104. Kadem B., Göksel M., Çenocak A., Demirbaç E., Atilla D., Durmuç M., Basova T., Shanmugasundaram K., Hassan A. Polyhedron 2016, 110, 37-45. doi:10.1016/j.poly.2016.01.053.
105. Wu H., Chen Z., Zhang J., Wu F., He C., Wang B., Wu Y., Ren Z. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 1096-1104. doi:10.1039/ C5TA09213B
106. Sharma A.K., Saini R., Singh R., Mahajan A., Bedi R.K., Aswal D.K. AIP Conf. Proc. 2014, 1591, 671-673. doi: 10.1063/1.4872714.
107. Sharma A.K., Kumar R, Saini R., Bedi R.K., Mahajan A. AIP Conf. Proc. 2016, 1728, 020493. doi:10.1063/1.4946544.
108. Sharma A.K., Mahajan A., Bedi R.K., Kumar S., Debnath A.K., Aswal D.K. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 427, 202-209. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.040.
109. Sharma A.K., Mahajan A., Kumar S., Debnath A.K., Aswal D.K. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 32719-32730. doi: 10.1039/ C8RA05529G.
110. Sharma A.K., Mahajan A., Saini R., Bedi R.K., Kumar S., Debnath A.K., Aswal D.K. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2018, 255, 87-99. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2017.08.013.
111. Kumar S., Chawla S., Zou M.C. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2017, 88, 129-158. doi:10.1007/s10847-017-0728-2.
112. Sarkar T., Ashraf RM., Srinives S., Mulchandani A. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 268, 115-122. doi:10.1016/j. snb.2018.04.078.
113. Sarkar T., Srinives S. Microelectron. Eng. 2018, 197, 28-32. doi:10.1016/j.mee.2018.05.004.
114. Wei L., Lu D., Wang J., Wei H., Zhao J., Geng H., Zhang Y. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 190, 529-534. doi:10.1016/j. snb.2013.09.017.
115. Bensghaïer A., Kaur N., Fourati N., Zerrouki C., Lamouri A., Beji M., Mahajan A., Chehimi M.M. Vacuum 2018, 155, 656-661. doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.07.004.
116. Zagal J.H., Griveau S., Silva J.F., Nyokong T., Bedioui F. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010, 254, 2755-2791. doi:10.1016/j. ccr.2010.05.001.
117. Nyokong T., Bedioui F. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2006, 10, 1101-1115. doi: 10.1142/S1088424606000454.
118. Bouvet M., Gaudillat R, Suisse J.-M. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2013, 17, 913-919. doi:10.1142/S1088424613300073.
119. Porto L.S., da Silva D.N., Silva M.C., Pereira A.C. Electro-analysis 2019, 31, 820-828. doi:10.1002/elan.201800789.
120. Nyoni S., Nyokong T. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 136, 240-249. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.093.
121. Lin C.-Y., Balamurugan A., Lai Y.-H., Ho K.-C. Talanta 2010, 82, 1905-1911. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2010.08.010.
122. Rebis T., Lijewski S., Nowicka J., Popenda L., Sobotta L., Jurga S., Mielcarek J., Milczarek G., Goslinski T.
Electrochim. Acta 2015, 168, 216-224. doi:10.1016/j.elect-acta.2015.03.191.
123. Patrascu D., David I., David V., Mihailciuc C., Stamatin I., Ciurea J., Nagy L., Nagy G., Ciucu A.A. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 156, 731-736. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2011.02.027.
124. Silva S.M., de Oliveira F.M., Justino D.D., Kubota L.T., Tanaka A.A., Damos F.S., de Cássia Silva Luz R. Electro-analysis 2014, 26, 602-611. doi:10.1002/elan.201300576.
125. Porras-Gutiérrez A.G., Frontana-Uribe B.A., Gutiérrez-Granados S., Griveau S., Bedioui F. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 89, 840-847. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2012.11.018.
126. Zuo X., Zhang H., Li N. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2012, 161, 1074-1079. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2011.12.013.
127. Sancy M., Francisco Silva J., Pavez J., Zagal J.H.J. Chil. Chem.Soc. 2013, 58, 2117-2121. doi:10.4067/S0717-97072013000400048.
128. Devasenathipathy R., Palanisamy S., Chen S.-M., Karup-piah C., Mani V., Ramaraj S.K., Ajmal Ali M., Al-Hemaid F.M.A. Electroanalysis 2015, 27, 1403-1410. doi:10.1002/ elan.201400659.
129. Devasenathipathy R., Karuppiah C., Chen S.-M., Palanisamy S., Lou B.-S., Ali M.A., Al-Hemaid F.M.A. RSCAdv. 2015, 5, 26762-26768. doi:10.1039/C4RA17161F.
130. Shumba M., Nyokong T. Electroanalysis 2016, 28, 1478-1488. doi:10.1002/elan.201501058.
131. Koyun O., Gorduk S., Gencten M., Sahin Y. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 85-92. doi:10.1039/C8NJ03721C.
132. Li P., Ding Y., Wang A., Zhou L., Wei S., Zhou Y., Tang Y., Chen Y., Cai C., Lu T. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 2255-2260. doi:10.1021/am400152k.
133. Apetrei I.M., Rodriguez-Mendez M.L., Apetrei C., de Saja J.A. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 177, 138-144. doi:10.1016/j. snb.2012.10.131.
134. de Holanda L.F., Ribeiro F.W.P., Sousa C.P., da Silva Casciano P.N., de Lima-Neto P., Correia A.N. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 772, 9-16. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.04.021.
135. Mugadza T., Nyokong T. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 354, 437-447. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2010.10.057.
136. Jubete E., Zelechowska K., Loaiza O.A., Lamas P. J., Ochoteco E., Farmer K.D., Roberts K.P., Biernat J.F. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 3988-3995. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2011.01.123.
137. Wu H., Guo L., Zhang J., Miao S., He C., Wang B., Wu Y., Chen Z. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 230, 359-366. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2016.02.088.
138. Zhang J., Chen Z., Wu H., Wu F., He C., Wang B., Wu Y., Ren Z. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 1310-1317. doi:10.1039/ C5TB01995H.
139. Buber E., Yuzer A., Soylemez S., Kesik M., Ince M., Toppare L. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 96, 61-69. doi:10.1016/j. ijbiomac.2016.12.020.
140. Apetrei C., Nieto M., Rodríguez-Méndez M.L., de Saja J.A. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2011, 15, 908-917. doi:10.1142/ S108842461100377X.
141. Baba A., Kanetsuna Y., Sriwichai S., Ohdaira Y., Shinbo K., Kato K., Phanichphant S., Kaneko F. Thin Solid Films 2010, 518, 2200-2205. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2009.09.052.
142. Reuillard B., Le Goff A., Holzinger M., Cosnier S. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 2228-2232. doi:10.1039/C3TB21846E.
143. Giroud F., Minteer S.D. Electrochem. Commun. 2013, 34, 157-160. doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2013.06.006.
144. Tiwari I., Singh M., Gupta M., Aggarwal S.K. Mater. Res. Bull.
2012, 47, 1697-1703. doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.03.031.
145. Çenocak A., Köksoy B., Akyüz D., Koca A., Klyamer D., Basova T., Demirba§ E., Durmu§ M. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 128, 144-150. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2018.12.052.
146. Çenocak A., Basova T., Demirbas E., Durmu§ M. Electroanalysis 2019, 31, 1697-1707. doi:10.1002/elan.201900214.
147. Ji L., Yu S., Zhou X., Bao Y., Yang F., Kang W., Zhang X. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1079, 86-93. doi:10.1016/j. aca.2019.06.027.
148. Bourourou M., Elouarzaki K., Lalaoui N., Agnès C., Le Goff A., Holzinger M., Maaref A., Cosnier S. Chem. - A Eur. J.
2013, 19, 9371-9375. doi:10.1002/chem.201301043.
149. Song M., Wang X., Liu W., Zuo J. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 343, 48-51. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2009.10.084.
150. Li P., Liu H., Ding Y., Wang Y., Chen Y., Zhou Y., Tang Y., Wei H., Cai C., Lu T. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 15370. doi:10.1039/c2jm31350b.
151. Mao X., Wu Y., Xu L., Cao X., Cui X., Zhu L. Analyst 2011, 136, 293-298. doi:10.1039/C0AN00402B.
152. Kamyabi M.A., Narimani O., Monfared H.H. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2010, 644, 67-73. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.03. 037.
153. Azadbakht A., Abbasi A.R. Russ. J. Electrochem. 2013, 49, 1127-1138. doi:10.1134/S1023193513120021.
154. Zhou Y., Wang S., Zhang Y. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 8817-8825. doi:10.1021/jp104258d.
Received 29.06.2020 Accepted 17.07.2020
