Science for Education Today
2020, том 10, № 6
http://sciforedu.ru
ISSN 2658-6762
© Г. Бужупай, В. Гасхи-Берисха
DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.2006.13
УДК 378+159+314
Гендерные репрезентации в учебных книгах EFL: корпусное исследование
Г. Бужупай, В. Гасхи-Берисха (Приштина, Косово)
Проблема и цель. С помощью этого корпусного тематического исследования авторы осуществляют гендерную репрезентацию в четырех учебниках английского языка как иностранного (ELF), рассматривая «изучение английского языка» с точки зрения грамматики. В частности, в исследовании наблюдаются частота встречающихся местоимений «он» и «она», ассоциации четырнадцати глаголов действия с определенным полом и выявляются различия в гендер-ной репрезентации между учебниками для 3 и 4 курсов.
Методология. Для анализа проблемы был составлен корпус «Сделай сам» (Do-It-Yourself-DIY) с выбранными текстами, сохраненными индивидуально из каждого учебника.
Для сбора и анализа данных в настоящем исследовании используется смешанный подход. Применяя AntConc, сначала извлекаются числовые данные, затем они качественно анализируются и интерпретируются.
Результаты. Полученные результаты свидетельствуют о недостаточной грамматической представленности женского пола. Кроме того, было выявлено, что определенные действия были связаны с определенным полом. В частности, заметным было позиционирование женских местоимений с домашней деятельностью или домашними делами, такими как приготовление пищи, в то время как мужские местоимения были связаны с такими действиями, как оплата счетов или ремонт автомобилей. Хотя оба пола одинаково участвовали в диалогах, контекстуальный анализ местоимений предполагает, что порядок упоминания в предложениях отражает мужское превосходство. Тем не менее, последние два уровня учебников показывают аналогичное представление пола, как и предполагалось.
Заключение. Анализ местоимений и глаголов в данном исследовании выявил неравномерное и предвзятое представление пола в учебниках, что имеет отношение к будущему образованию. Тем не менее, это всего лишь тематическое исследование, и выводы не могут быть итоговыми. Наконец, авторы считают, что дальнейший анализ гендерной репрезентации вучебни-ках курса с точки зрения других грамматических аспектов даст еще более полные результаты.
Ключевые слова: гендернаярепрезентация; корпус DIY; учебники EFL; местоимения; глаголы действия.
Бужупай Греса - кандидат технических наук, преподаватель, кафедра математики, факультет математических и естественных наук, университет Приштины «Хасан Приштина», Приштина, Косово.
E-mail: [email protected]
Гасхи-Берисха Валбона - доктор наук, доцент, заведующий кафедрой, кафедра французского языка и литературы, филологический факультет, университет Приштины «Хасан Приштина», Приштина, Косово. E-mail: [email protected]
© 2011-2020 Science for Education Today Все права защищены
Science for Education Today
2020, том 10, № 6
http://sciforedu.ru
ISSN 2658-6762
СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ
1. Amerian M., Esmaili F. Language and gender: A critical discourse analysis on gender representation in a series of international ELT textbooks // International Journal of Research Studies in Education. - 2015. - Vol. 4 (2). - P. 3-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2014.963
2. Ashby M. S., Wittmaier B. C. Attitude changes in children after exposure to stories about women in traditional or nontraditional occupations // Journal of Educational Psychology. - 1978. -Vol. 70 (6). - P. 945-949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.70.6.945
3. Barton A., Sakwa L. N. The representation of gender in English textbooks in Uganda. Pedagogy // Culture & Society. - 2012. - Vol. 20 (2). - P. 173-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.669394
4. Blumberg R. L. Gender bias in textbooks: A hidden obstacle on the road to gender equality in education // Paper Commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report. - 2008. URL: http://www.rosadoc.be/digidocs/dd-000658_2007_gender_bias_in_textbooks.pdf
5. Blumberg, R. L. The invisible obstacle to educational equality: gender bias in textbooks. Prospects 38 (3), 345-361 (2008). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-009-9086-1
6. Butler J. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. - New York, Routledge. 2002. URL: http://b-ok.org/s/?q=gender+trouble&yearFrom=&yearTo=&language=&extension=&t=0
7. Coles G. Dick and Jane grow up: Ideology in adult basic education readers // Urban Education. -1977. - Vol. 12 (1). - P. 37-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085977121003
8. Emilia E., Moecharam N. Y., Syifa I. L. Gender in EFL classroom: Transitivity analysis in English textbook for Indonesian students // Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. - 2017. - Vol. 7 (1). -P. 206-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6877
9. Gharbavi A., Mousavi S. A. The application of functional linguistics in exposing gender bias in Iranian high school English textbooks // English Language and Literature Studies. - 2012. -Vol. 2 (1). - P. 85-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v2n1p85
10. Gupta A. F., Yin A. S. L. Gender representation in English language textbooks used in the Singapore primary schools // Language and Education. - 1990. - Vol. 4 (1). - P. 29-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789009541271
11. Hyseni H., Llunji V., Kabashi-Hima A. Gender equality in the reading textbooks during the nine years of compulsory education in Kosovo. - Kosova Education Center, Prishtina. 2007. URL: http://www.kec-ks.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Gender-equality-in-the-reading-textbooks-during-the-nine-years-of-compulsory-education-in-Kosovo- 1.pdf
12. Jones M. A., Kitetu C., Sunderland J. Discourse roles, gender and language textbook dialogues: who learns what from John and Sally? // Gender and Education. - 1997. - Vol. 9 (4). - P. 469-490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540259721204
13. Kirk J., Miller M. L. Reliability and validity in quantitative research. - California, Sage Publications, 1986. URL: https://books.google.nl/books?hl=en&lr&id=YDFZlq_KM88C&oi=fnd&pg= PA5&dq=Reliability+and+validity+in+quantitative+research&ots=uiVaWZnzcy&sig=
A9_P0JMLbTDTGSh4RdWqiG0dxTY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=perspectiv&f=false
14. Lee J. F. Gender representation in Japanese EFL textbooks - a corpus study // Gender and Education. - 2018. - Vol. 30 (3). - P. 379-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1214690
15. Lee J. F., Collins P. Gender voices in Hong Kong English textbooks - Some past and current practices // Sex Roles. - 2008. - Vol. 59 (1-2). - P. 127-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9414-6
© 2011-2020 Science for Education Today Все права защищены
Science for Education Today
2020, том 10, № 6
http://sciforedu.ru
ISSN 2658-6762
16. Lewandowski M. Gender stereotyping in EFL grammar textbooks: A diachronic approach // Linguistic Online. - 2014. - Vol. 68 (6). - P. 83-99. URL: https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/arti-cle/view/1635
17. Mineshima M. Gender representations in an EFL textbook // Bulletin of Niigata Institute of Technology. - 2008. - Vol. 13. - P. 121-140. URL: http://nirr.lib.niigata-u.ac.jp/bit-stream/10623/20259/1/13_121-140.pdf
18. Porreca K. L. Sexism in current ESL textbooks // TESOL Quarterly. - 1984. - Vol. 18 (4). -P. 704-724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586584
19. Sapir E. The status of linguistics as a science // Language. - 1929. - Vol. 5 (4). - P. 207-214. URL: http: //www .j stor.org.sheffield.idm .oclc.org/stable/409588?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
20. Sunderland J., Cowley M., Rahim F. A., Leontzakou C., Shattuck J. From bias "in the text" to "teacher talk around the text": An exploration of teacher discourse and gendered foreign language textbook texts // Linguistics and Education. - 2000. - Vol. 11 (3). - P. 251-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00034-6
21. Tacium D. "Judith Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, (New York: Routledge, 1990)" Surfaces, 1993, vol. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1065107ar
22. Yang C. C. R. Is Gender stereotyping still an issue? An analysis of a Hong Kong primary English textbook series // Online Submission. - 2012. - Vol. 13 (2). - P. 32-48. URL: https://files-eric-ed-gov.sheffield.idm.oclc.org/fulltext/ED545382.pdf
23. Zeldes A. "Tony McEnery, Richard Xiao & Yukio Tono. 2006. Corpus-Based Language Studies. An Advanced Resource Book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London, New York: Routledge. XX, 386 S". Zeitschrift für Rezensionen zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft, 2010, vol. 2 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zrs.2010.050
© 2011-2020 Science for Education Today Все права защищены
Science for Education Today
2020, Vol. 10, No. 6 http://en.sciforedu.ru/ ISSN 2658-6762
DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.2006.13
Gresa Bujupaj
PhD Candidate, Lecturer,
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical and Natural Sciences,
University of Prishtina "Hasan Prishtina", Prishtina, Kosovo. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0040-9343 E-mail: [email protected] Valbona Gashi-Berisha
Associate Professor, Dr., Head of Department,
Department of French Language and Literature, Faculty of Philology,
University of Prishtina "Hasan Prishtina", Prishtina, Kosovo.
E-mail: [email protected]
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2795-4915
Introduction. Through this corpus-based case study, the authors examine gender representation in four English as a Foreign Language (ELF) course books, "Exploring English", through a grammatical perspective. Particularly, the study observes the frequencies of pronouns 'he' and 'she', the association of fourteen action verbs with a certain gender, and differences in gender representation between Course book 3 and 4. To analyse the issue, a Do-It-Yourself (DIY) corpus is compiled with texts selected and stored individually from each course book.
Materials and Methods. A mixed approach is used to collect and analyse the data for this study. By using AntConc, the study firstly retrieves the numerical data which are further analysed and interpreted qualitatively.
Results. The findings suggest underrepresentation of women. In addition, certain actions were associated with a particular gender. More specifically, noticeable was the positioning of feminine pronouns with domestic activities or chores such as cooking, while masculine pronouns were linked with actions such as paying bills or repairing cars. Although both genders participated equally in dialogues, the contextual analysis ofpronouns suggests that the order of mention in sentences reflects masculine supremacy. Nevertheless, the last two levels of the course books suggest a similar representation of gender as hypothesised.
Conclusions. The pronoun and verb analysis in this study revealed the uneven and biased representation of gender in textbooks which is concerning for the future of education. Yet, this is only a case study and findings cannot be generalized. Lastly, the authors consider that further analysis on gender representation in the course books from other grammatical aspects would provide even more comprehensive results.
Keywords
Gender representation; DIY corpus; EFL course books; Pronouns; Action verbs.
© 2011-2020 Science for Education Today All rights reserved
Gender representation in EFL course books explored through a corpus-based study: A case study
Abstract
Introduction
Language is a powerful tool which can shape our thoughts. The discussion on the power of language dates back to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis that language influences one's view of the world (Sapir, 1929). However, the relation between language and gender in textbooks has attracted attention since the 1970s. Among the first studies on gender representation in textbooks are (Porreca, 1984; Ashby and Wittmaier, 1978; and Coles, 1977).
Although gender issues in texts are pervasive, English as a Foreign Language (ELF) textbooks in developing countries are not largely analysed (Sunderland, Cowley, Rahim, Leontzakou, and Shattuck, 2000). In Kosovo gender issues are examined only in native language textbooks. Therefore, this corpus-based project intends to examine gender representation in four EFL course books. It centres on the area of sociolinguistics, specifically on the construction of gender through language in texts. The analysis is conducted from a grammatical perspective, mainly parts of speech, of a written corpus. The project aims to show whether the texts present women and men equally and their roles unbiased by attempting to answer the following questions:
RQ1: Do the course book texts reveal equal representation of both genders through the frequency of gender-specific pronouns?
RQ2: How are gender roles in the course book texts constructed through the use of action verbs?
RQ3: Do Course book 3 and 4 show any differences in gender representation?
The motivation for this project derives from the fact that textbooks are considered agents of socialisation and have significant pedagogical impact on gender conceptions (Mineshima, 2008). Learners rely on the information provided in textbooks to form opinions on different topics (Gupta and Yin, 1990). Gender biased
representation affects the learners' perception on what is typical for women and men in the society. Gender stereotypes against women can cause feelings of devaluation and lowered expectations to female students (Gharbavi and Mousavi, 2012). Consequently, to discuss this issue a brief literature review is presented in the subsequent chapter.
Literature Review
The following selected studies in the literature review are assets to the present project due to the approaches used in examining gender issues which foreground the discussion of this analysis. Nevertheless, prior the review of existing literature on gender in textbooks, it is important to define that sex is a biological element whereas gender is a social construction (Butler, 2002).
A study which indicates the existence of gender issues in Albanian language textbooks in Kosovo is Hyseni, Llunji and Kabashi-Hima (2007). The authors analyse seven reading textbooks in Albanian where 90 indicators are found which reinforce the leading male role in the texts. The findings confirm the NUL hypothesis that new Albanian language textbooks for primary and lower secondary schools lack sensitivity in educating students regarding gender roles. Additionally, interviews with teachers and students support the evidence found through the analysis.
Gender stereotypes in ELF grammar textbooks through corpora are analysed by Lewandowski (2014) using a diachronic approach. The contrastive analyses of two corpora (with 1970-80s and 21st century textbooks published in the UK) show increase of female characters in the texts after 20 years. The findings from both corpora show that women are commonly described by their looks. Compared to
the old ELF textbooks, the new ones show more women in primary jobs.
Through a similar corpus-based approach, Lee (2018) analyses gender representation in Japanese EFL textbooks through a mixed approach. The analysis of four popular series of EFL textbooks published in 2011 reveal gender-inclusive vocabulary such as waitperson, and the neutral feminine address title Ms. However, the male-first trend prevails throughout the texts which indicates the secondary role of women.
Conversely, Amerian and Esmaili (2015) examine three volumes American Headway Student Textbooks from a grammatical perspective through critical discourse analysis. It results that activities such as driving, working, eating in a restaurant, studying, and playing/doing sports are dominated by men. Alternatively, making, shopping, and going to parties are performed by women.
Barton and Sakwa (2012) analyse the second book of the textbook series English in Use used in Ugandan lower secondary schools. The content analysis shows that women are twice invisible than men. Female are excluded also from real life settings such as classrooms. Even when women are visible in certain units, they are stereotypically represented. Caretaker, emotional, child-bearer, and cook are some of the most frequent associations made with women, while men are given high-status jobs as doctors, judges, or managers.
The array of studies described hitherto offers insights on gender issues that exist in EFL textbooks. Most of the discussed studies found that females are unrepresented, stereotyped, or negatively portrayed in contrast to their counterparts. While there is deficiency in studies
1 Education for All Global Monitoring Report. Education
for All by 2015—Will we make it? (Paris: UNESCO 2008). URL: http://www.unesdoc.unesco.org/im-
ages/0015/001555/155509e.pdf
analysing gender in EFL textbooks used in Kosovo, the presented perspectives and results assist the current project in comparing and contrasting its findings.
Hypotheses
Three hypotheses are set in accordance with the research questions. Initially, women are underrepresented in texts through generic pronouns as 'he' and 'she' (Blumberg, 2008)1. This leads to the first hypothesis that (H1): the frequency of gender-specific pronouns is expected to reveal that women as less visible than men in the texts. Alternatively, verbs express different activities which are performed frequently by either gender (Sunderland, 2006)2. Therefore, it is hypothesised that (H2): gender roles are stereotyped through the actions associated with a certain gender in the texts. Lastly, since Course book 3 and 4 belong to the same edition it is considered that (H3): gender presentation remains same in the last two course books.
Research Design
Corpora can be used to illustrate many aspects regarding women and men's language (Lindquist, 2009) 3 . It allows examining how women and men are referred in texts, how gender roles are constructed in the society, and how genders are represented throughout different periods.
Developing a Course book DIY Corpus
Four Exploring English course books, currently used in all lower secondary schools in Kosovo, are chosen for analysis. Consent and access to the electronic versions were received
2 Sunderland J. Language and Gender: An Advanced Resource Book. New York, Routledge, 2006.
3 Lindquist H. Corpus Linguistics and the Description of English. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2009.
All rights reserved
from the owner of the printing house. A Do-it- by selecting and storing text chunks as txt files Yourself (DIY) corpus of 43,155 words is created from each course book separately (see Table 1).
Table 1
Size of the DIY Corpus
Level Number ofwords
Course book 1 5473
Course book 2 7634
Course book3 14350
Course book 4 15698
Total 43155
Stratified random sampling is used to select the texts. The sample includes varieties of texts for analysis such as reading passages, dialogues, picture descriptions, fill-in the gap exercises, and questions. These texts are selected because they provide context where gender roles can be examined. Only listening exercises are excluded since tape scripts are not provided, therefore it is impossible to understand the context.
The number of words per course book is not equal since the first two course books contain less text and more pictures. The data is analysed through the free concordance tool AntConc since it is an unannotated DIY corpus. Annotation was omitted because it does not assist further answering the research questions and any form of annotation would be time-consuming for this time-limited project. Similarly, the corpus markup done is delimited to contextual information on the course books as further mark-up is not essential for the analysis.
Methodology
This project uses a mixed approach to collect and analyse the data. Employing different methods or presenting various perspectives on the same issue supports the rationality and implications of the study (Kirk and Miller, 1986). The quantitative method examines the frequencies of gender-specific pronouns (She and He) and provides numerical results on gender representation. Additionally, fourteen randomly selected actions verbs from the first course book (every 5th verb from the index of verbs) are observed to show whether certain actions are stereotypically associated with a particular gender (see table 2). The random selection is done to avoid sampling bias by the researcher. The verbs are chosen from the first course book because they will most probably reappear in the other three course books. Moreover, they are selected and analysed in singular and plural, as well as in their present, past, and continuous forms using AntConc with the help of the wildcard (*). Each instance is observed in context, excluding manually irrelevant concordance hints.
Table 2
Randomised selection of action verbs
1 List of verbs
Buy _Pay_1
Cook _Repair_
Drive Shine
1 Fly Speak
Grill Teach
1 Leave Watch
Make iBafr. "1
Results association of action verbs with gendered subj ects
This chapter provides the results based on in the identified instances (see table 3). the data with the frequencies of pronouns and
Table 3
Frequency of verbs in the four course book texts
Verbs Coarse book 1 Course book 2 Coarse book3 Course book4
Bay 21 25 11
Cook 2 1 5 3
Drive 1 19 9 19
Fly ^ At 7 At S
GrUl 1 1 1 0
Leave ^ 9 At At 13 |
Make 4 29 23 33
1 Pay At 1 11 5
Repair j At 1 1 6
Shine ^ A j At 1 _1__i
Speak At 10 6 11
Teach 1 At 2 <»
Watch "f 16 S 12
Write 3 4 15 _U_1
Gender visibility
Figure 1 shows that the gender-specific pronoun he appears more frequently throughout the four course books than the other pronoun she.
With the increase of the word number in the course books, also the visibility or invisibility of these two pronouns increases.
Course book 1 Course book 2 Course book 3 Course book -4 Fig. 1. Gender representation through gender-specific pronouns
Action verbs in Course book 1
To present the association of action verbs with a specific gender, four distinctions need to be made. She is used when the action verbs are associated with feminine nouns or pronouns; He is used when the same actions are linked with masculine subjects; Both refers to feminine and masculine nouns or pronouns which appeared together in a structure; whereas Neutral represents
subjects where the gender could not be identified through the context.
Figure 2 reveals actions such as buy, cook, make and teach performed more by feminine nouns or pronouns, while masculine subjects are associated with drive, grill, repair and watch in Course book 1. Fly, leave, speak, and write show an equal association with both genders.
Fig. 2. Associations of action verbs with gender-specific pronouns in Course book 1
Action verbs in Course book 2 Course book 2 presents distinct associations of actions with women or men. In Figure 3 the numbers are higher and indicate discrepancies
between drive, leave and watch which are clearly men dominated, while buy, fly, make and teach are more women dominated. However, there is an increase of make associated with she.
Fig. 3. Associations of action verbs with gender-specific pronouns in Course book 2
Action verbs in Course book 3
Conversely, in Course book 3 most actions are predominantly associated with masculine nouns or pronouns. Buy, drive, leave, pay, speak,
watch and write in Figure 5 are performed by masculine subjects. Cook and make are mainly associated with she.
Fig. 4. Associations of action verbs with gender-specific pronouns in Course book 3
© 2011-2020 Science for Education Today
All rights reserved
247
2020, Vol. 10, No. 6
http://en.sciforedu.ru/
ISSN 2658-6762
Action verbs in Course book 4 Similarly, in Course book 4 certain actions are performed by masculine subjects. However,
Figure 5 indicates a slight increase in actions such as buy, leave, speak, watch and write, which are performed by feminine subjects.
Fig. 5. Associations of action verbs with gender-specific pronouns in Course book 4
Discussion
Considering that the project is a case study and it is unlikely to ascertain the representative the corpus, this chapter intends to treat the findings cautiously, avoiding groundless generalisations (McEnery, Xiao and Tono, 2006)4. The results in the four course books reveal underrepresentation of women through gender-specific pronouns. Although Jones, Kitetu and Sunderland (1997) argue that in textbooks men mostly initiate conversations, this does not apply for the texts analysed in this project. The texts show initiation of conversations from both genders. Nevertheless, the contextual analysis of pronouns suggests that the order of mention in sentences reflects masculine supremacy. The high frequency of male-firstness in the order of mention could be attributed to the fixed expression 'he or she' (Lee and Collins, 2008).
Hence, the results in Table 2 reveal masculine gendered pronouns as more frequent and in the four texts, thus confirming the first hypothesis that women are less visible in the course book collection.
When it comes to the qualitative analysis and the peculiar association of action verbs with a certain gender it is difficult and almost impossible to objectively examine the findings. After manually mapping all concordance hints, the instances are analysed individually. While there is an attempt to present women as adventurous through their association with the verb fly, women are still assigned domestic roles through the verb cook and make. In several instances, make indicates the preparation of food or drinks by women for their families. Alternatively, men are given decision-making roles as in 'make a very wise decision', 'made out a check for five
4 McEnery T., Xiao R., Tono Y. Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London, Routledge, 2006.
© 2011-2020 Science for Education Today All rights reserved
248
thousand euros' and 'make a lot of money'. Buy is also an indicator that women in the analysed texts are more likely to perform actions of buying food, ingredients and clothes; whereas buying cars, books, and expensive presents for their partners are more performed by men (see appendix 1). However, 'he's making coffee' or 'she's repairing the engine' suggest that the actions are not completely biased. Yet, grill, pay, repair and watch, especially watching TV, sport and games are mostly depicted as male-dominated activities. The constant association of men with drive, particularly fast or dangerous driving presents men as risk-takers (Emilia, Moecharam and Syifa, 2017). These results partly confirm the second hypothesis that gender roles are stereotyped through action verbs because certain instances show both genders performing different activities.
Lastly, this project aims to answer whether level 3 and 4 indicate differences in gender representation. The two course books are compared because they have almost similar and larger numbers of words than the first ones. The findings reveal women as less visible in Course book 4. While in Course book 3 the frequency of 'he' associated with specific actions is significantly high, the numbers are lower in Course book 4, particularly with actions such as buy, leave, pay and write. Although there are changes on gender representation between the last two levels in terms of women and men visibility and their roles; the differences do not reveal positive representations of women. These findings support the third hypothesis that Course book 3 and 4 present gender similarly. Nevertheless, Yang (2012) argues that even when textbooks try to avoid gender asymmetry and stereotyping, it is difficult to achieve equality since women and men are physically different and as such engage in different activities.
Conclusions
This study aimed at examining gender representation in four EFL course books using corpora. Firstly, the quantitative analysis of basic numerical information illustrates the frequencies of gender-specific pronouns and confirms the asymmetrical representation of gender, specifically the invisibility women in the sample. Additionally, the qualitative observation indicates that certain actions are stereotyped or tend to be performed more by either women or men, although there is an effort to neutralise gender-specific actions. Finally, the last two course books show varying results, thus not rejecting the third hypothesis. Yet, neither of them suggests more positive representations of women throughout the texts. As such, it can be concluded that female characters are underrepresented and stereotyped in the selected texts.
As stated above, the categorisation of verbs is done manually; therefore, some instances might be unintentionally tabulated twice. The analysis is delimited to fourteen verbs; other verbs might provide different insights. Additionally, the unbalanced number of words per course book does not allow further comparisons between the texts. However, the case study could contribute to creating the background for future research using the same sample, whereas the perspective and methods employed can be applied for further examinations in other texts. The project provides some understanding on gender representation through action verbs, yet it could be reinforced by examining other grammatical aspects. Lastly, the findings could help teachers who use the course books to identify gender issues in the texts and provide their own examples using both genders simultaneously.
© 2011-2020 Science for Education Today
All rights reserved
249
2020, Vol. 10, No. 6 http://en.sciforedu.ru/
ISSN 2658-6762
REFERENCES
1. Amerian M., Esmaili F. Language and gender: A critical discourse analysis on gender representation in a series of international ELT textbooks. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 2015, vol. 4 (2), pp. 3-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2014.963
2. Ashby M. S., Wittmaier B. C. Attitude changes in children after exposure to stories about women in traditional or nontraditional occupations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978, vol. 70 (6), pp. 945-949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.70.6.945
3. Barton A., Sakwa L. N. The representation of gender in English textbooks in Uganda. Pedagogy. Culture & Society, 2012, vol. 20 (2), pp. 173-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.669394
4. Blumberg R. L. Gender bias in textbooks: A hidden obstacle on the road to gender equality in education. Paper Commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report, 2008. URL: http://www.rosadoc.be/digidocs/dd-000658_2007_gender_bias_in_textbooks.pdf
5. Blumberg R. L. The invisible obstacle to educational equality: gender bias in textbooks. Prospects, 2008, vol. 38 (3), pp. 345-361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-009-9086-1
6. Butler J. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, 2002, New York, Routledge. URL: http://b-ok.org/s/?q=gender+trouble&yearFrom=&yearTo=&language=&extension=&t=0
7. Coles G. Dick and Jane grow up: Ideology in adult basic education readers. Urban Education, 1977, vol. 12 (1), pp. 37-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085977121003
8. Emilia E., Moecharam N. Y., Syifa I. L. Gender in EFL classroom: Transitivity analysis in English textbook for Indonesian students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2017, vol. 7 (1), pp. 206-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6877
9. Gharbavi A., Mousavi S. A. The application of functional linguistics in exposing gender bias in Iranian high school English textbooks. English Language and Literature Studies, 2012, vol. 2 (1), pp. 85-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v2n1p85
10. Gupta A. F., Yin A. S. L. Gender representation in English language textbooks used in the Singapore primary schools. Language and Education, 1990, vol. 4 (1), pp. 29-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789009541271
11. Hyseni H., Llunji V., Kabashi-Hima A. Gender equality in the reading textbooks during the nine years of compulsory education in Kosovo, 2007. Kosova Education Center, Prishtina. URL: http://www.kec-ks.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Gender-equality-in-the-reading-textbooks-during-the-nine-years-of-compulsory-education-in-Kosovo- 1.pdf
12. Jones M. A., Kitetu C., Sunderland J. Discourse roles, gender and language textbook dialogues: who learns what from John and Sally? Gender and Education, 1997, vol. 9 (4), pp. 469-490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540259721204
13. Kirk J., Miller M. L. Reliability and validity in quantitative research. California, Sage Publications, 1986. URL: https: //books.google.nl/books?hl=en&lr&id=YDFZlq_KM88C&oi=fnd&pg=PA5&dq=Reliabilit y+and+validity+in+quantitative+research&ots=uiVaWZnzcy&sig=A9_P0JMLbTDTGSh4RdWq iG0dxTY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=perspectiv&f=false
14. Lee J. F. Gender representation in Japanese EFL textbooks - a corpus study. Gender and Education, 2018, vol. 30 (3), pp. 379-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1214690
15. Lee J. F., Collins P. Gender voices in Hong Kong English textbooks - Some past and current practices. Sex Roles, 2008, vol. 59 (1-2), pp. 127-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9414-6
© 2011-2020 Science for Education Today All rights reserved
250
2020, Vol. 10, No. 6 http://en.sciforedu.ru/
ISSN 2658-6762
16. Lewandowski M. Gender stereotyping in EFL grammar textbooks: A diachronic approach. Linguistic Online, 2014, vol. 68 (6), pp. 83-99. URL: https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/1635
17. Mineshima M. Gender representations in an EFL textbook. Bulletin of Niigata Institute of Technology, 2008, vol. 13, pp. 121-140. URL: http://nirr.lib.niigata-u.ac.jp/bitstream/10623/20259/1/13_121-140.pdf
18. Porreca K. L. Sexism in current ESL textbooks. TESOL Quarterly, 1984, vol. 18 (4), pp. 704-724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586584
19. Sapir E. The status of linguistics as a science. Language, 1929, vol. 5 (4), pp. 207-214. URL: http: //www .j stor.org.sheffield.idm .oclc.org/stable/409588?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
20. Sunderland J., Cowley M., Rahim F. A., Leontzakou C., Shattuck J. From bias "in the text" to "teacher talk around the text": An exploration of teacher discourse and gendered foreign language textbook texts. Linguistics and Education, 2000, vol. 11 (3), pp. 251-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00034-6
21. Tacium D. "Judith Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, (New York: Routledge, 1990)". Surfaces, 1993, vol. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1065107ar
22. Yang C. C. R. Is Gender stereotyping still an issue? An analysis of a Hong Kong primary English textbook series. Online Submission, 2012, vol. 13 (2), pp. 32-48. URL: https://files-eric-ed-gov.sheffield.idm.oclc.org/fulltext/ED545382.pdf
23. Zeldes A. "Tony McEnery, Richard Xiao & Yukio Tono. 2006. Corpus-Based Language Studies. An Advanced Resource Book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London, New York: Routledge. xx, 386 S". Zeitschrift für Rezensionen zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft, 2010, vol. 2 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zrs.2010.050
Submitted: 30 July 2020 Accepted: 10 November 2020 Published: 31 December 2020
© ®
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
© 2011-2020 Science for Education Today
All rights reserved