CC BY
8il, ЕШШ^ ШШ
(Н)
ФД2015 ^ШШЙЙ^ШФУ, ФДйе 2014-2016
[и s. »ш^. а^давдя. 2015(1) :бо-вз.
S. 2015 (3) : 84-93.
[з] тт. Фтш-.ттттт 2015(5)^-10.
Ли Цзюньчжи - Манчжурский институт, Университет Внутренней Монголии, г. Манчжурия, КНР.
Li Junzhi - Manzhouli College, Inner Mongolia University, Manzhouli, China. УДК 329.1
DOI 10.18101/2306-753X-2015-2-46-52
© Ли Гуанин Li Guangying ^^^
From the Party-State Elite Strategy Choice Perspective the End of the Soviet System -Read David Katz "From the top of the Revolution: the end of the Soviet system"
According to the issue of the collapse of the Soviet Union's System, the popular view is that the highly centralized political and economic system lead to economic collapse, as a result, the Soviet people gave up the confidence of the communist party. However, by reading the American scholar David's work, he interviewed more than 50 former leaders; the author found that it was the communist party elites who turned over the foundations of Soviet System finally. Based on this view, this article tries understanding the col-
46
lapse of the soviet system from a perspective of the Soviet party-state elites' political choice. Key Words: the Party-State Elites, the Soviet System, Reformation, Strategy Choice.
(irltl) il^f^iri^tt^ffligftaTlffi^. Mffi
r=
M^m^o sk^^BJI^,
mm
M7 ^«tt^xis®o
шшшш^хтшшятттш'шв; з. ж^^^т^^подш^
тш^^ш^тгшм, жтшъшйшшмш^шштшт мтмжйАо шя, ^шошвзо^й^ж®
з.^й^т^Лйй-^йШо ш
жшттшшш'шшшшто ж, ^шшгм^й»««, ^м^м^^т^ш^Жо 1 ттш-штшъшшштшшя, 'ЙШМЖТ-^ФЙ*^
ОТ, ЭДЖЖЖМЯШШ^ЙШЖо
МЛ»,
Жо " 2
йо ъж'ш^шфт&тт^път&ттъш** "
Ш шмшлтшн
ФШШМЙ^о
1 ^±,тз1Ш.
2
3 теэш.
"млтвдтай^ шш, »Й^
й^м» тъш, ШЙ, «ШЙ ^й^шж^дшм, ^ЙИ^ЙЙ^Я^Й^Й^Т^^ЙЙ^ЖЙФ,
ШЙ&ШШ№ "ШШ" ШТ, ШШШ, МЪШШШШ
шшмзйва^ш штшшъшшшяя., МЙЙЙШ^Й
шт ШЙ, мзмжм, МЗМЖМЙШ, т^йэдж^йШ'Щ 1.
(-)
»»«йт-РШ, Й1985М19894, М^Ш^Ш
Ш1986^М1990^ЙШ4%й^^^о ЖШТН^
ШйШМШ: «Д^ФШ йШ,
М-МЙМЙ 'шш^тт-хйтмшж-шттттх*
it^st. М^Ш^ЛЙШПЙЙ^
й^т, шя^шмжйймт тшшш,
йашв^мдайфйжмфш^мо ШЙ,
йо 1990^Ж, ШЯШ&Ш (^йЯШЮ о Ш^Й
ШШ», Ж^ЙМШМ^ЙШЙО ШтШШ-кШШЪП* Ш, ЙШ^МЙД^ЬКЙ,
-ШЙМШ&±ХМ&ЙШ* 1991^7^1 вшштт^т
шшплито»дышш&ш. то 1991 «¿м, ШЙ, М^Й+^МЙ^»
ШЙ, ЛММ,
ФЙЙЙ^^^О ^ЙММ^даШш«^«, ШЙ, ШЙШШЕ& тШо
Л»Д^ ИЙШШШШЙШШШШШЙЯ-ШШН*=
Шй
ШЙ, ттшжшшмтйш
(Н)
ОТ: 1988^,
шдашшим
^о 1988^12^, ш, шшшшж
zrn, лг^йдаштж Ж^ШЙо шшшшшя
ЙШНо
^1989-1991^, ФЖШШ
ймт ^шмтштш^йАо
йй^.
2^±, В 121 ж.
feo
1991^12^25 0, 12^310, ЭДЩИ»
, я тттшшш
Й*^ЖШ±,2008,(5) .
[2]^Ш. , 1994.
[3] т) ка-
[4] Лм0»,2О12,(19) .
[5] ^¿л.
[6] ,2003,(2).
[7] [Ш] H^tt^ft^, 1997(3) .
Ли Гуанин - Манчжурский институт, Университет Внутренней Монголии, г. Манчжурия, КНР, e-mail: 121863107@qq.com
Li Guangying - Manzhouli College, Inner Mongolia University, Manzhouli, China, e-mail: 121863107@qq.com
УДК 327(470+510)
DOI 10.18101/2306-753X-2015-2-52-57
© Чэнь Шулин Chen Shuling
Анализ развития русско-китайских отношений в области культуры
на современном этапе
Analysis on the Significance of Multicultural Exchange Cooperation between China and Russia
The cultural exchanges between countries and the culture communication are the foundation of the depth of cooperation and longterm cooperation. Multicultural coexistence is the era background of the development of today's society, which has an irresistible trend of the development of, so we must face up to the pluralistic culture on the impact of cooperation between China and Russia to play its positive role and limit its negative influenc e. This article mainly from the meaning of cultural diversity to promote cooperation between the two countries, analyzes the development trend of bilateral cooperation between China and Russia, and in diverse cultural exchange between China and Russia are the obstacles were studied. Putting forward to strengthen the support of the government to promote the cultural exchange between China and Russia. So as to widen the channel of the multicultural talents training and so on.In order to strengthen the multicultural communication to promote the further cooperation between China and Russia.
Key words: culture, cultural diversity, cooperation, Chia, Russia.
