CC BY
40ISSN 2072-5981 doi: 10.26907/mrsej
aänetic Resonance in Solids
Electronic Journal
Volume 21 Special Issue 3 Paper No 19305 1-9 pages 2019
doi: 10.26907/mrsej-19305
http: //mrsej. kpfu. ru http: //mrsej. ksu. ru
Established and published by Kazan University Endorsed by International Society of Magnetic Resonance (ISMAR) Registered by Russian Federation Committee on Press (#015140),
August 2, 1996 First Issue appeared on July 25, 1997
© Kazan Federal University (KFU)*
"Magnetic Resonance in Solids. Electronic Journal" (MRSey) is a
peer-reviewed, all electronic journal, publishing articles which meet the highest standards of scientific quality in the field of basic research of a magnetic resonance in solids and related phenomena.
Indexed and abstracted by Web of Science (ESCI, Clarivate Analytics, from 2015), Scopus (Elsevier, from 2012), RusIndexSC (eLibrary, from 2006), Google Scholar, DOAJ, ROAD, CyberLeninka (from 2006), SCImago Journal & Country Rank, etc.
Editor-in-Chief Boris Kochelaev (KFU, Kazan)
Honorary Editors
Jean Jeener (Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels) Raymond Orbach (University of California, Riverside)
Executive Editor
Yurii Proshin (KFU, Kazan) mrsej@kpfu. ru
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0
International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Editors
Vadim Atsarkin (Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics, Moscow) Yurij Bunkov (CNRS, Grenoble) Mikhail Eremin (KFU, Kazan) David Fushman (University of Maryland, College Park) Hugo Keller (University of Zürich,
Zürich)
Yoshio Kitaoka (Osaka University,
Osaka)
Boris Malkin (KFU, Kazan) Alexander Shengelaya (Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi) Jörg Sichelschmidt (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Dresden) Haruhiko Suzuki (Kanazawa University, Kanazava) Murat Tagirov (KFU, Kazan) Dmitrii Tayurskii (KFU, Kazan) Valentine Zhikharev (KNRTU,
Kazan)
Technical Editors of Issue
Maxim Avdeev (KFU) Alexander Kutuzov (KFU)
* In Kazan University the Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) was discovered by Zavoisky E.K. in 1944.
Short cite this: Magn. Reson. Solids 21, 19305 (2019) doi: 10.26907/mrsej-19305
Fluctuations of various order parameters in cuprate and Fe-based superconductors as revealed by microwave absorption measurements
I.I. Gimazov1'*, Yu.I. Talanov1, T. Adachi2, T. Noji3, Y. Koike3, K. Omori3, Y. Tanabe3'4, D. Chareev5'6, A. Vasiliev6'7
1Zavoisky Physical-Technical Institute, Kazan 420029, Russia
2Department of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Sophia University, Tokyo 102-8554, Japan
3Department of Applied Physics, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579, Japan
4Department of Physics, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
5Institute of Experimental Mineralogy, RAS, Chernogolovka 142432, Russia
6Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg 620002, Russia
7M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia
*E-mail: gimazov@kfti.knc.ru
(Received March 10, 2019; accepted March 12, 2019; published April 19, 2019)
Fluctuations of various order parameters are considered as the significant components of understanding the mechanism of high-Tc superconductivity. To study these fluctuations in the cuprate and Fe-based superconductors we use the joint measurements of direct current resistivity and non-resonant microwave absorption. Comparing data obtained with both methods allowed us to extract the contribution of dynamic charge density waves in La2_xSrxCuO4, superconducting fluctuations in Bi2Sr2Cai_xYxCu2Og and nematic fluctuations in FeTei_xSex.
PACS: 74.40.+k, 74.70.-b, 74.72.-h, 52.70.Gw.
Keywords: high temperature superconductors, superconducting order parameter fluctuations, non-resonant microwave absorption.
Dedicated to Boris I. Kochelaev, mentor and colleague, on the occasion of his 85th birthday
1. Introduction
The search of key interaction responsible for the Cooper pair formation in cuprate and Fe-based superconductors is associated with the necessary study of the numerous phases being above the superconducting transition temperature Tc. The order parameters of these phases are of different nature: magnetic, orbital, charge et al. All of them are to some extent under suspicion of responsibility for the electron pairing. In other words, the fluctuations of one of these order parameters could be "a glue of Cooper pairs". The most preferred candidates for this role are magnetic fluctuations (or correlations). There is much speculation that the antiferromagnetic correlations of spin-density-wave (SDW) type are responsible for the electron scattering above Tc, and for their pairing below Tc, and for the rotational symmetry breaking (that is for nematic ordering) as well (see, e.g., [1-4]). For this reason the spin fluctuations are intensively investigated with the neutron scattering and other methods in cuprate superconductors [1,2,5,6], iron pnictides [3,4,7-9] and iron chalcogenides [10-13]. Note, there are other applicants for the role of the Cooper pairs glue except spin fluctuations. Among them are the Jahn-Teller-type electron-lattice interaction [14] nematic fluctuations [15] etc.
The fluctuation impact on the electron scattering can be found upon applying a hydrostatic pressure and/or a high magnetic field. In this case their influence is manifested via the change
of the resistivity versus temperature dependence [16,17]. This is because of the fluctuation strengthening at high pressure. At the ambient pressure the fluctuations are weak and shortlived, their lifetime is shorter than the electron-scattering time t. Therefore, their impact on the DC resistivity is negligible. Then they can be detected with the high-frequency measurements only. As an example, the optical pump-probe study has revealed the long-lived long-range ne-matic order at temperatures below the structural tetragonal-to-orthorhombic transition Ts and short-lived 10-12 s) fluctuations at T > Ts [15]. And the terahertz spectroscopy allowed the authors of Ref. [18] to detect the superconducting fluctuation (SCF) at temperatures a few degrees higher than Tc. The data presented in this article was obtained with the nonres-onant microwave absorption (MWA) measurements at frequency 9.2 GHz on various cuprate and Fe chalcogenide superconductors. It accumulate results of study performed on crystals La2-xSrxCuO4, Bi2Sr2Ca1-xYxCu2O8+y and FeTe1-xSex and published previously [19-21].
MWA is determined by the current carrier scattering, and so the comparison of the MWA data obtained at the frequency of the order of ~ 1010 Hz with the DC resistivity data allows us to separate the contribution of the short-lived excitations (such as fluctuations of different type, dynamical charge density wave and so on) to the ohmic loss.
2. Measurement technique
In a conductive material the microwave absorption takes place in a skin-layer. Therefore, the MWA value is proportional to the skin-layer volume. The temperature variation of the skin-layer thickness leads to the dependence of the MWA signal amplitude on temperature Amwa (T). The skin-layer thickness is determined by the resistivity p as 5 = c (p/2nw^)1/2 (c is the light speed, w is the frequency, and ^ is the magnetic permeability). Thus Amwa rc /p. The ohmic loss is the main contribution to microwave absorption. The contributions due to the fluctuations of various order parameters can be separated by comparing the functions Amwa(T) and \Jp(T).
The microwave absorption of sample studied was measured using the standard electron spin resonance (ESR) spectrometer Bruker BER-418s. Its working frequency is 9.2 ^ 9.5 GHz. The spectrometer is sensitive to the weak short-lived electron excitations owing to the lock-in technique of the signal detection and amplification with 100 kHz magnetic modulation. To keep the applied magnetic field to be constant during the measurement, we replaced the applied field modulation by the modulation of the incident microwave radiation. The microwave field modulation is realized with the PIN-diode inserted in the waveguide between a clystron (the microwave radiation source) and the cavity resonator of TE102 mode with a sample placed into its center. The temperature variation performed with the helium-gas-flow cryostat in the range from a room temperature down to 7K.
The sample resistance was measured using a standard four-probe method at the direct current 3.6 mA. The superconducting transition is determined via the magnetic AC susceptibility measurements at a frequency 1.3 kHz.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Superconducting fluctuations in Bi2Sr2Ca1-xYxCu2O8+y
The Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 compound has a pronounced layered structure of the crystal lattice. In many cases it behaves like quasi-two-dimensional system. For this reason, fluctuations manifest themselves in many phenomena taking place in this material. In particular, superconducting fluctuations (SCF) have a noticeable effect on the diamagnetic response [22,23], the Nernst sig-
nal [24] in the temperature range as wide as several tens of degrees Kelvin. We have found the SCF influence on the MWA in the Bi2Sr2Ca1-xYxCu2O8+y crystals [20].
The crystals with various current carrier (holes) density were studied. To change the hole density in samples, calcium was partially substituted for yttrium in the Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 compound. Varying Y concentrations x in Bi2Sr2Ca1-xYxCu2O8 from 0 to 0.2, samples with different doping are obtained: at x = 0 a sample is overdoped by holes (OD) and has Tc = 88K; at x = 0.1 a sample is optimally doped (OP) with Tc = 94 K; when x = 0.2 a sample is underdoped (UD) with Tc = 77 K.
The variation of the MWA amplitude Amwa with temperature is shown in Fig. 1 for three samples. It decreases slightly with lowering the temperature from 300 K down to some temperature Tf marked with a vertical arrow in the figure. Below this temperature the Amwa(T) dependence slope changes a sign. An upturn of the Amwa(T) function at T = Tf is found for OP and UD samples, but not for OD. The sharp decrease of Amwa at superconducting transition is observed in all samples. Note, the metallic character of the Amwa(T) dependence at T > Tf corresponds to the p(T) dependence. However, the latter does not demonstrate an upturn in the whole temperature range down to Tc. Therefore, one can conclude that some short-lived excitations contribute to MWA but not to resistivity.
The maximum of the Amwa(T ) dependence near the critical temperature is called "loss peak". Its origin is discussed in Ref. [25] on the basis of the theoretical work [26]. In line with the model of [25] the appearance of the loss peak is governed by the superconducting fluctuations formed in a sample at the temperature close Tc. We trace the emergence of the MWA temperature dependence anomaly caused by SCF Tf marked by arrows in Fig. 1. The MWA amplitude versus T was recorded for the Bi2Sr2Ca1-xYxCu2O8 crystals with various x. The loss peak due to SCF is observed on Amwa(T) dependence of all samples except for OD. We assume Tf is very close to Tc for this sample.
The obtained Tf dependence on the hole density p was plotted on the "temperature - hole density" phase diagram along with the critical temperature Tc(p) and the pseudo gap temper-
T, K
Figure 1. Temperature dependence of the MWA signal amplitude for the Bi2Sr2Cai_xYxCu2O8+y with various Y doping.
ature T*(p). The phase diagram has adduced in our early work [20]. The Tf (p) dependence determines the upper boundary of the fluctuation area as revealed by the MWA measurements. Tc(p) is its lower boundary. The obtained data indicates the presence of superconducting fluctuations in the wide temperature range for the underdoped samples. This range decreases as the hole density increases and becomes zero for the OD sample. This fact together with the absence of the loss peak in the pnictide data [20] gives the basis for the assumption on stimulating effect of the pseudogap on the SCF development. The SCF detection using the MWA technique indicates the fluctuation lifetime on order of 10-10 s or more. Our estimates of Tf (p) are in good agreement with the ARPES [27] and STS data [28] but diverge from the Nernst effect measurements [24] in the region of the large hole density.
3.2. Dynamic charge density waves in La2_xSrxCuO4
La2-xSrxCuO4 (LSCO) is another famous member of the cuprate superconductor family. Fluctuations of the superconducting order parameter in this material were studied in detail by means of the diamagnetic response investigation [29] and the Nernst effect measurements [24]. The latter revealed a very wide temperature range of SCF, which amounts about 100 K at x = 0.1. However, the later works (see, e. g. [30]) casted doubt on the interpretation of the Nernst effect data [24] and estimated Tf being only ~ 20 K higher than Tc. Moreover, using THz time-domain spectroscopy to probe the superconducting fluctuations in La2-xSrxCuO4 thin films allowed the authors of [18] to conclude that they persist in a comparatively narrow temperature range, at most 16 K above Tc. The authors of [31] explained the Nernst signal at higher temperatures by the influence of the stripe order fluctuations. Thus, the strip order plays a significant role at some temperature range. The dynamical forms of the stripe structure, such as spin density waves (SDW) and charge density waves (CDW), admix to SCF and complicate considerably understanding the picture. Dynamical CDW provide a high conductivity and metallic character of the resistivity versus temperature dependence p(T) [32]. If there are obstacles for the CDW motion, the form of p(T) changes drastically from the metallic type to the activation one. This occurs below the structural transition temperature Ts where the crystal structure turns from tetragonal form (T > Ts) to orthorhombic one (T < Ts) in compounds La2-xBaxCuO4 and La2-xSrxCuO4 doped with neodymium Nd. At T < Ts CDW's become pinned. It produces a condition of weak localization of current carriers and the p(T) dependence character changes. There is no pinning structure in La2-xSrxCuO4 without Nd. CDWs have the dynamical or fluctuational nature here. To detect them the high-frequency technique is required, such as MWA measurements.
The La2-xSrxCuO4 single crystals studied in our work were grown with the traveling solvent floating zone techniques at the Tohoku University, Japan. The hole concentration per Cu ion (the hole density p) in this compound coincides with the strontium concentration x. It allows one to control the hole density by changing x. The optimally doped (OP) sample with x = 0.16 has the highest critical temperature Tc = 37.6 K. Tc of overdoped (OD) crystal is slightly lower (32.2 K), and the transition temperatures of several underdoped (UD) samples fall gradually with decreasing x down to 19.3 K at x = 0.077. The superconducting transition temperatures were determined with the AC susceptibility measurements as the onset of the diamagnetic response.
The temperature dependence of the MWA amplitude is shown in Fig. 2 for two UD and one OP LSCO samples. The deviation (upturn) is seen from the linear dependence upon decreasing the temperature below the certain point depicted by arrow in Fig. 2. The same deviation is observed for all underdoped samples but it is absent in OP and OD samples. In the last samples Amwa(T) decreases monotonically down to critical temperature where the sharp fall takes place.
C
La, Sr CuO.
2-x x 4
vH
——***
x=0.116
_L
20
40
60
80
TK
100
120
140 160
Figure 2. Temperature dependence of the MWA signal amplitude for the La2_xSrxCuO4 samples with various Sr concentration. The straight lines are drawn to easy find the deviation of AMWa(T) from the linear dependence.
The upturn of the Amwa(T) function is indicative of the emergence of the additional scattering channel with lowering temperature. It is possibly connected with fluctuating CDW. However, the superconducting fluctuations can contribute to MWA at temperatures close to Tc as well (see, e. g., [20,25,26]). The impact of the magnetic field on the Amwa(T) dependence allows one to separate these two contributions. The MWA loss peak due to SCFs discussed in the previous paragraph is broadened and shifted with increasing field [26] while the CDW contribution is unaffected by magnetic field. For the UD sample with x = 0.077 and Tc = 19.3 K the upturn occurs at 27 K, while the field dependence arises below 24 K. Thus one can assume that the temperature of the CDW emergence TCDW is 27K. Another UD sample with x = 0.116 and Tc = 24.3K demonstrates the upturn due to CDWs at 75 K (depicted by arrow in Fig. 2) and the field dependence below 43 K. Thus, the Amwa(T) curves obtained at various magnetic fields for the LSCO crystals with various x enable us to derive the boundary points of the regions with CDWs, superconducting fluctuations and the bulk superconductivity state. The x — T phase diagram of the La2-xSrxCuO4 compound is plotted on the base of obtained data and presented in our work [19]. It was found that the doping range of the CDW presence in LSCO is considerably broader than that obtained from the XRD study [33]. This observation correlates well with the transport data [32].
3.3. Nematic fluctuations in FeTe1-xSex
Fe-based superconductors have many properties similar to that of cuprates: layered structure, reach phase diagram and the influence of various order fluctuations on their characteristics. In iron pnictides the magnetic ordering of the SDW type and the nematic ordering take place simultaneously below the temperature of the tetra-ortho structural transition Ts while in iron chalcogenides the nematic order occurs without the magnetic state establishment. (The nematic ordering is characterized by breaking the fourfold rotational symmetry and by formation of the twofold symmetry of electronic parameters, such as resistivity, magnetic susceptibility etc.) This difference can be eliminated by applying a pressure [16]. At an ambient pressure the long-lived long-range nematic order exists only in a few of iron chalcogenide compounds (FeSe and
FeSei —xSx) at T < Ts. And above Ts there are only fluctuations of nematic order parameter [15]. In the compound with partial substitution of Se by Te (FeTei-xSex) the structural transition does not occur. Therefore, the nematic order can be present in the form of fluctuations only. To detect them we use the MWA measurements again.
The crystals with the various Se/Te ratio were investigated. They were grown using the flux technique. The sample composition obtained with the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) revealed excess iron in all samples except for pure FeSe. The last sample has a narrow superconducting transition with T°nset = 9.1 K while the transition is broad in FeTei-xSex with T°nset = 12 ^ 15 K depending on a sample composition. The broad transition testifies about the sample heterogeneity, which is consequence of an excess iron.
The comparison of the MWA versus temperature data with the resistivity measurements is shown in Fig. 3 for FeSe. In this figure and hereafter the resistivity data are plotted as square root of p. Such comparison takes into account the circumstance that Amwa rc fp in normal state without fluctuations (see Part 2). The temperature variation of the resistivity has all features described in literature (see, e.g., [15,16]). It has the positive slope over the whole region above Tc and the anomaly near Ts ~ 90 K due to the tetragonal to orthorhombic structural transition. p falls sharply down to zero at the superconducting transition Tc ~ 9K. In Fig. 3 the MWA amplitude value is attached to the fp data by magnitude and slope at high temperatures. The Amwa(T) function has all features listed above for the yjp(T) dependence. However the magnitudes of two function diverge in the temperature range from Tc to ~ 170 K. We suggest the discrepancy is due to the short-lived fluctuations of spin or nematic order. They contribute to MWA, but not to the DC resistivity because of their life-time shorter than the electron scattering time.
The divergence between two functions increases with the temperature decrease and reaches its maximum just below Ts. With further lowering the temperature the divergence diminishes and becomes negligible close to Tc. The similar behavior was found for the nematic-order contribution to the in-plane resistivity anisotropy of the FeSe crystal [34]. This gives grounds for conclusion that the additional contribution to MWA is due precisely to nematic fluctuations.
T, K
Figure 3. Temperature dependence of the p1/2 (points) and the AMWa (line) for the FeSe sample.
T, K
Figure 4. Temperature dependence of the p1/2 (points) and the AMWa (line) for the Fe1.27Te0.54Se0.46 sample.
The consequences of the partial substitution of Se by Te in the FeSe compound can be traced on the example of the Fe1+yTe1-xSex crystal with the approximately equal Te and Se portions: Fe1.27Teo.54Seo.46. The Te addition results in the excess iron appearance. It induces the weak localization effect which manifests as the activation form of resistivity p(T) at temperatures above Tc (see Fig. 4). There is no anomaly due to the tetra-ortho structural transition on the p(T) dependence and, as a consequence, the long-range nematic order does not emerge. However, the comparison of the Amwa(T) and p(T) functions in Fig. 4 shows the fluctuation contribution to MWA in the range from 30K to 140K. Since Fe1.27Te0.54Se0.46 and FeSe are akin compounds, the probability of the nematic nature of the fluctuations is high enough.
The results of the comparative study of the DC resistivity and microwave absorption in the Fe1+yTe1-xSex crystals are in good agreement with the neutron scattering study of spin fluctuations in such samples [10]. The neutron study showed the presence and competition of two types of magnetic correlations (i. e., fluctuations): isotropic (Neel) type and anisotropic (stripe) type. The latter most likely might be an origin of the nematic fluctuation observed in our study. More detailed discussion of the results obtained on the Fe1+yTe1-xSex samples is published in the work [21].
In conclusion, the comparative analysis of the resistivity data and the microwave absorption results gives the unique opportunity to separate the contribution of short-lived excitations, in particular the superconducting fluctuations, the dynamical charge density waves and the nematic fluctuations in cuprate and Fe-based superconductors.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Russian Academy of Sciences via the grant of Program 1.12 "Fundamental Problems of High-Temperature Superconductivity". The work of D.Ch. is supported by the program 211 of the Russian Federation Government, agreement No. 02.A03.21.0006 and by the Russian Government Program of Competitive Growth of Kazan Federal University. The work of A.V. has been supported by Act 211 of the Government of Russian Federation, Contracts No. 02.A03.21.0006 and No. 02.A03.21.0011.
References
1. Wilson S.D., Dai P., Li S., Chi S., Kang H.J., Lynn J.W. Nature 442, 59 (2006)
2. Taillefer L. Ann. Rev. Cond. Mat. Phys. 1, 51 (2010)
3. Kim M.G., Lamsal J., Heitmann T.W., Tucker G.S., Pratt D.K., Khan S.N., Lee Y.B., Alam A., Thaler A., Ni N., Ran S., Bud'ko S.L., Marty K.J., Lumsden M.D., Canfield P.C., Harmon B.N., Johnson D.D., Kreyssig A., McQueeney R.J., Goldman A.I. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 167003 (2012)
4. Dioguardi A.P., Lawson M.M., Bush B.T., Crocker J., Shirer K.R., Nisson D.M., Kissikov T., Ran S., Bud'ko S.L., Canfield P.C., Yuan S., Kuhns P.L., Reyes A.P., Grafe H.-J., Curro N.J. Phys. Rev. B 92, 165116 (2015)
5. Hayden S.M., Mook H.A., Dai P., Perring T.G., Dogan F. Nature 429, 531 (2004)
6. Tranquada J.M., Woo H., Perring T.G., Goka H., Gu G.D., Xu G., Fujita M., Yamada K. Nature 429, 534 (2004)
7. Inosov D.S., Park J.T., Bourges P., Sun D.L., Sidis Y., Schneidewind A., Hradil K., Haug D., Lin C.T., Keimer B., Hinkov V. Nat. Phys. 6, 178 (2009)
8. Parshall D., Lokshin K.A., Niedziela J., Christianson A.D., Lumsden M.D., Mook H.A., Nagler S.E., McGuire M.A., Stone M.B., Abernathy D.L., Sefat A.S., Sales B.C., Man-drus D.G., Egami T. Phys. Rev. B 80, 012502 (2009)
9. Lester C., Chu J.-H., Analytis J.G., Perring T.G., Fisher I.R., Hayden S.M. Phys. Rev. B 80, 064505 (2010)
10. Liu T.J., Hu J., QianB., FobesD., MaoZ.Q., BaoW., ReehuisM., Kimber S.A.J., ProkesK., Matas S., Argyriou D.N., Hiess A., Rotaru A., Pham H., Spinu L., Qiu Y., Thampy V., Savici A.T., Rodriguez J.A., Broholm C. Nature Materials 9, 716 (2010)
11. Xu Z., Wen V., Xu G., Chi S., Ku W., Gu G., Tranquada J.M. Phys. Rev. B 84, 052506 (2011)
12. Wang Q., Shen Y., Pan B., Zhang X., Ikeuchi K., Iida K., Christianson A.D., Walker H.C., Adroja D.T., Abdel-Hafiez M., Chen X., Chareev D.A., Vasiliev A.N., Zhao J. Nat. Commun. 7, 12182 (2016)
13. Imai T., Ahilan K., Ning F.L., McQueen T.M., Cava R.J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 177005 (2009)
14. Keller H., Bussmann-Holder A., Müller K.A. Materials Today 11, 38 (2008)
15. Luo C.-W., Cheng P.C., Wang S.-H., Chiang J.-C., Lin J.-Y., Wu K.-H., Juang J.-Y., Chareev D.A., Volkova O.S., Vasiliev A.N. npj Quantum Materials 2, 32 (2017)
16. Terashima T., Kikugawa N., Kasahara S., Watashige T., Matsuda Y., Shibauchi T., Uji S. Phys. Rev. B 93, 180503(R) (2016)
17. Kang J.-H., Jung S.-G., Lee S., Park E., Lin J.-Y., Chareev D.A., Vasiliev A.N., Park T. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 29, 035007 (2016)
18. Bilbro L.S., Aguilar R.V., Logvenov G., Pelleg O., Bozovic I., Armitage N.P. Nat. Phys. 7, 298 (2011)
19. Gimazov I.I., Adachi T., Omori K., Tanabe Y., Koike Y., Talanov Yu.I. JETP Lett. 108, 675 (2018)
20. Gimazov I., Talanov Yu., Sakhin V., Adachi T., Noji T., Koike Y. Appl. Magn. Reson. 48, 861 (2017)
21. Gimazov I.I., Lyadov N.M., Chareev D.A., Vasiliev A.N., Talanov Yu.I. JETP 155, 6 (2019)
22. Li L., Wang Y., Naughton M.J., Ono S., Ando Y., Ong N.P. Europhys. Lett. 72, 451 (2005)
23. Wang Y., Li L., Naughton M.J., Gu G.D., Uchida S., Ong N.P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 247002 (2005)
24. Wang Y., Li L., Ong N.P. Phys. Rev. B 73, 024510 (2006)
25. GrbiC M.S., BariSiC N., DulCiC A., KupCiC I., Li Y., Zhao X., Yu G., Dressel M., Greven M., PoZek M. Phys. Rev. B 80, 094511 (2009)
26. Gough C.E., Exon N.J. Phys. Rev. B 50, 488 (1994)
27. Zhang W., Smallwood C.L., Jozwiak C., Miller T.L., Yoshida Y., Eisaki H., Lee D.-H., Lanzara A. Phys. Rev. B 88, 245132 (2013)
28. Gomes K.K., Pasupathy A.N., Pushp A., Ono S., Ando Y., Yazdan Y. Nature 447, 569 (2007)
29. Carballeira C., Mosqueira J., RevColevsChi A., Vidal F. Physica C 384, 185 (2003)
30. Cyr-Choiniere O., Daou R., Laliberte F., Collignon C., Badoux S., LeBoeuf D., Chang J., Ramshaw B.J., Bonn D.A., Hardy W.N., Liang R., Yan J.-Q., Cheng J.-G., Zhou J.-S., Goodenough J.B., Pyon S., Takayama T., Takagi H., Doiron-Leyraud N., Taillefer L. Phys. Rev. B 97, 064502 (2018)
31. Cyr-Choiniere O., Daou R., Laliberte F., LeBoeuf D., Doiron-Leyraud N., Chang J., Yan J.-Q., Cheng J.-G., Zhou J.-S., Goodenough J.B., Pyon S., Takayama T., Takagi H., Tanaka Y., Taillefer L. Nature 458, 743 (2009)
32. Ando Y., Lavrov A.N., Komiya S., Segawa K., Sun X.F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 017001 (2001)
33. Christensen N.B., Chang J., Larsen J., Fujita M., Oda M., Ido M., Momono N., Forgan E.M., Holmes A.T., Mesot J., HueCker M., Zimmermann M.V. arXiv:1404.3192 (2014)
34. Tanatar M.A., Böhmer A.E., Timmons E.I., SChütt M., DraChuCk G., Taufour V., Kotha-palli K., Kreyssig A., Bud'ko S.L., Canfield P.C., Fernandes R.M., Prozorov R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 127001 (2016)
