����-����������
�������������� ������
South Russian
Journal of Cancer..
Vol. 5
No. 3, 2024
����-����������
�������������� ������
South Russian
Journal of Cancer..
Vol. 5
No. 3, 2024
South Russian Journal of Cancer. 2024. Vol. 5, No. 3. P. 16-30
https://doi.org/10.37748/2686-9039-2024-5-3-2
https://elibrary.ru/eyiruh
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Experience in creating primary cultures of endometrial cancer and
studying cells carrying phenotype of cancer stem cells
S. Yu. Filippova, I. V. Mezhevova, T. V. Chembarova , I. A. Novikova, E. V. Verenikina, O. E. Zhenilo,
V. V. Polovodova, A. V. Shaposhnikov, E. V. Shalashnaya, A. A. Maslov, O. G. Ishonina
National Medical Research Centre for Oncology, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
tanyshamova@mail.ru
ABSTRACT
Purpose of the study. Was to investigate the possibility of applying the method of spheroid formation in culture for assessment
of the endometrial cancer (EC) tumor stem cells (TSC) content in complex samples containing various tumor cells and
microenvironment.
Materials and methods. Primary cultures were obtained from fragments of tumors removed during surgery as a first stage
of treatment at the Department of Gynecological Oncology, the National Medical Research Center for Oncology. After enzymatic
disaggregation of tissue, cell suspension was passaged in DMEM medium containing 10 % fetal bovine serum and 1 %
gentamicin to obtain primary two-dimensional cultures. To study the ability of cells to form spheroids, the primary culture
was removed from the culture plate and passaged with 2.0 . 104 cells per well of a six-well plate (n = 6) in DMEM medium
containing 0.35 % agarose and growth factors EGF (20 ng/ml) and FGF (20 ng/ml). After two weeks of cultivation, the average
size, number of formed spheroids, and frequency of spheroid formation were determined. For those cultures that had formed
spheroids, immunofluorescent
staining of the two-dimensional
culture for the marker CD133
was
performed, after which the
frequency of CD133+ cells was determined.
Results. A total of nine primary cultures of EC were obtained, five of which formed spheroids within two weeks of cultivation
under non-adhesive conditions. In these cultures, small polygonal CD133+ cells showed the strongest association with spheroid
formation, which were associated with the largest spheroids (98�110 .m in diameter).
Conclusion. There is a large number of microenvironmental cells in mixed cultures of CSC, some of which may express CD133,
including healthy stem
cells that also form spheroids in soft agar. A more detailed study of CSC subpopulations compared to
normal endometrium is required to establish a link between the observed diversity of cells in culture and their ability to form
spheroids and other characteristics of tumor stem cells.
Keywords: endometrial cancer, primary cell cultures, cancer stem cells, cell spheroids
For citation: Filippova S. Yu., Mezhevova I. V., Chembarova T. V., Novikova I. A., Verenikina E. V., Zhenilo O. E., Polovodova V. V., Shaposhnikov A. V.,
Shalashnaya E. V., Maslov A. A., Ishonina O. G. Experience in creating primary cultures of endometrial cancer and studying cells carrying phenotype of cancer
stem cells. South Russian Journal of Cancer. 2024; 5(3): 16-30. https://doi.org/10.37748/2686-9039-2024-5-3-2, https://elibrary.ru/eyiruh
For correspondence: Tatiana V. Chembarova � junior research fellow at the laboratory of cellular technologies, National Medical Research Centre for
Oncology, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
Address: 63 14 line str., Rostov-on-Don 344037, Russian Federation
E-mail: tanyshamova@mail.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4555-8556
SPIN: 5426-1873, AuthorID: 1051985
ResearcherID: AAR-3198-2021
Scopus Author ID: 57221303597
Compliance with ethical standards: the work followed the ethical principles set forth by World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, 1964, ed. 2013.
The study was approved by the Committee on Biomedical Ethics at the National Medical Research Centre for Oncology (extract from the minutes of the
meeting No. 25 dated 09/08/2022). Informed consent has been obtained from all participants of the study
Funding: this work was not funded
Conflict of interest: the authors declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article
The article was submitted 26.12.2023; approved after reviewing 28.06.2024; accepted for publication 24.07.2024
� Filippova S. Yu., Mezhevova I. V., Chembarova T. V., Novikova I. A., Verenikina E. V., Zhenilo O. E., Polovodova V. V., Shaposhnikov A. V., Shalashnaya E. V.,
Maslov A. A., Ishonina O. G., 2024
����-���������� �������������� ������. 2024. �. 5, � 3. �. 16-30
https://doi.org/10.37748/2686-9039-2024-5-3-2
https://elibrary.ru/eyiruh
3.1.6. ���������, ������� �������
������������
������
���� �������� ��������� ������� ���� ���������� � ������������ � ��� ������,..
���������� ��������� ���������� ��������� ������..
�.
�.
���������, �.
�.
��������, �.
�.
��������� , �.
�.
��������, �.
�.
����������, �.
�.
������, �.
�.
����������,
�.
�.
����������, �.
�.
��������, �.
A.
������, �.
�.
�������
���� ������������� ����������� ����������������� ����� ���������� ������������ ��������������� ���������� ���������,
�. ������-��-����, ���������� ���������
tanyshamova@mail.ru
������
���� ������������.
������� ����������� ���������� ������ ������������������� � �������� ��� ������ ����������
����������
���������
������ (���)
���� ����������
(��)
� �������
��������, ����������
���������
������ ������� � ��������������.
���������
� ������.
���������
�������� �������� �� ���������� ��������, ���������
� ����
������������
�������������, �����������
� �������� �������
����� �� ������� �� � ��������� ��������������� ����
�������������
����������� ����������������� ����� ���������� ������������ ��������������� ���������� ���������.
����� �������������� ������������ ����� ��������� ��������� ����������� �
����� DMEM,
���������� 10
%
��������� ������ ��������� (���)
� 1
% �����������, ��� ��������� ���������
���������
�������. ��� ��������
����������� ������ � �������������������
���������
�������� ������� � �������������� ��������
� �����������
�� 2,0 . 104 ������ �� ����� 6-����������� �������� (n = 6) � ����� DMEM, ���������� 0,35
% ������� � �������
����� EGF (20
��/��) � FGF (20
��/��). ����� ��� ������ ��������������� ���������� ������� ������, ����������
������������ ��������� � ������� �������������������. ��� ���
�������, ������� ���������� ��������, ����
��������� ��������������������
�����������
��������� �������� ��
������ CD133, �����
���� ����������
������� CD133+ ������.
����������.
����� ���� �������� ������
���������
������� ��, ��
�������
������ ����
���������� ��������
������ ��� ������ ��������������� � ��������, �� ��������������
�������. �
����
���������
���������� �����
��
�������������������� �������� ��������� ������������� CD133+ ������, �
�������� ��������������� ��������
������� �������� (98�110 ��� � ��������).
����������.
�
���������
���������
��
������������ �������
���������� ������
��������������, ��
��������
����� ������ �����
��������������� CD133,
� ��� ����� ���������� ��������� ������,
����� ���������� ��������
� ������ �����. ��������� ����� ��������� �������� ��������� ������������ �� � ��������� � ����������
����������� ���
������������ ����� ����� ����������� ������������� ������ � �������� � �� ������������
� ������������������� � ������� ���������������� ���.
�������� �����: ��� ����������, ��������� ��������, ���������� ��������� ������, ��������� ��������
��� �����������: ��������� �. �., �������� �. �., ��������� �. �., �������� �. �., ���������� �. �., ������ �. �., ���������� �. �.,
���������� �. �., �������� �. �., ������ �. A., ������� �. �. ���� �������� ��������� ������� ���� ���������� � ������������ � ��� ������,
���������� ��������� ���������� ��������� ������. ����-���������� �������������� ������. 2024; 5(3): 16-30.
https://doi.org/10.37748/2686-9039-2024-5-3-2, https://elibrary.ru/eyiruh
��� ���������������: ��������� ������� ������������ � ������� ������� ��������� ����������� ��������� ����������,
���� ������������� ����������� ����������������� ����� ���������� ������������ ��������������� ���������� ���������,
�. ������-��-����, ���������� ���������
�����: 344037, ���������� ���������, �. ������-��- ����, ��. 14-� �����, �. 63
E-mail: tanyshamova@mail.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4555-8556
SPIN: 5426-1873, AuthorID: 1051985
ResearcherID: AAR-3198-2021
Scopus Author ID: 57221303597
���������� ��������� ����������: � ������ ����������� ��������� ��������, ������������� ������������ ����������� ���������
����������� ���������� (World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, 1964, ���. 2013). ������������ �������� ��������� ��
�������������� ����� ��� ���� ������������� ����������� ����������������� ����� ���������� ������������ ��������������� ����������
��������� (������� �� ��������� ��������� � 25 �� 08.09.2022 �.). ��������������� �������� �������� �� ���� ���������� ������������
��������������: �������������� ������ ������ �� �����������
�������� ���������:
���
������ �������� ��
����������
����� �
������������� ����������
���������,
��������� � �����������
���������
������
������ ��������� � �������� 26.12.2023; �������� ����� �������������� 28.06.2024; ������� � ���������� 24.07.2024
South Russian Journal of Cancer 2024. Vol. 5, No. 3. P. 16-30
Filippova S. Yu., Mezhevova I. V., Chembarova T. V. , Novikova I. A., Verenikina E. V., Zhenilo O. E., Polovodova V. V., Shaposhnikov A. V., Shalashnaya E. V., Maslov A. A.,
Ishonina O. G. Experience in creating primary cultures of endometrial cancer and studying cells carrying phenotype of cancer stem cells
INTRODUCTION
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the sixth most common
type of cancer in women. Over the past 30
years, the overall incidence of EC has increased by
132
%,
reflecting an increase in the prevalence of
risk factors, in particular, obesity and aging of the
population
[1]. In
Russia, EC
occupies
the
2nd
rank
in
the structure of oncological diseases of the female
genital organs. The total number of patients with
EC reached 195.6 per 100,000 population in 2022,
which is 31.8
%
more than in 2012 [2].
Thus,
there is
still a need to develop new therapeutic approaches
to significantly improve the prognosis
in women with
recurrent EC or in the later stages of the disease. In
this context, tumor stem cells (TSC) of endometrial
cancer, capable of self-renewal and differentiation
into mature tumor cells, as well as contributing to
tumor recurrence, metastasis, heterogeneity, multidrug
and radiation resistance, represent a potential
target for drug development [3].
TSC
were
first
identified
in
patients
with
acute
myeloid
leukemia in 1994, and have since been considered
potential therapeutic targets in the treatment of
oncological
diseases, including solid tumors
[4]. TSC
in
EC
were
first
described
by Hubbard
in
2009
[5]. The
discovery of endometrial OSCs has radically changed
the views on the study of the biology of EC and the
development of approaches to the treatment of this
disease. As a rule, EC TSC is identified by the expression
of specific antigens, by the weak accumulation
of the Hoechst 33342 nuclear dye (the so�called
side population � "side population"), by the ability
to form colonies under conditions of reduced adhesion
and initiate the growth of a tumor
containing
TSC and differentiated cells originating from them
with the same phenotype as "parental", in mice with
immunodeficiency [3].
A number of markers
associated with
the TSC of
solid tumors have been studied in EC. Aldehyde dehydrogenase
1 (ALDH1) is one of 19 different enzymes
involved in aldehyde oxidation. This enzyme is highly
active in the early stages of stem cell differentiation.
Atypical
EC cells
with
a high level
of ALDH1
expression
are more tumorogenic, invasive and resistant
to cisplatin
than
cells
with a low level
of ALDH1
expression.
Also, a high
level
of ALDH1
expression
correlates
with a worse prognosis in patients with EC [6].
Receptor tyrosine
kinase
c-Kit
or CD117
is
a receptor
for the Stem Cell Factor (SCF) and, upon activation,
triggers a number of intracellular signaling cascades
regulating cell survival, migration and proliferation,
including TSC [7]. When studying the cellular
composition
of EC, it was shown that CD117+ cells isolated
from Ishikawa and MFE280 EC cultures exhibit greater
proliferative ability, as well as the ability to form
colonies
in soft
agar in
the
presence
of SCF. A high
level of CD117 expression was also recognized as an
independent prognostic factor correlating with the
progression of EC [8]. The CD55 antigen is a complement
decay acceleration factor and is expressed at
a high
level
in
the
TSC of endometrioid ovarian
cancer
and EC. It has been shown that CD55+ cells are able
to regulate cell self-renewal and their resistance to
cisplatin to a greater extent than CD55
cells
[9]. A link
with TSC has also been established for the transmembrane
glycoprotein CD44, which plays the role
of an adhesion molecule. Cells overexpressing CD44
possess such characteristics of TSC as the ability
to self-renew and epithelial-mesenchymal transition
(EMF), as well as resistance to chemotherapy and
radiation therapy [10]. Probably, this marker is also
related to TSC EC, since oncospheres obtained on
soft agar from cells of EC cultures with stem prop
erties
are CD44
positive
[3]. In
addition, a number of
studies have noted the co-expression of CD44 and
another TSC marker CD133
in
the EC tissue
[11, 12].
The transmembrane glycoprotein of the cell surface
prominin-1 or CD133 has attracted considerable attention
due to the fact that its expression is often
observed in various subpopulations of somatic stem
cells. Usually, this glycoprotein is observed in the area
of various microvilli and protrusions of the plasma
membrane,
where CD133 can act as a regulator
of the
lipid composition of membranes or participate in the
mechanisms of cellular polarity and migration [13].
In
a study by Rutella et
al. (2009)
subpopulations
of
cells with the CD133+/CD44+ phenotype isolated from
permanent endometrial cancer cell lines showed the
ability to form tumor spheres, increased chemoresistance
and were
able
to initiate the formation
of a tumor
with the same phenotype as the original tumor
when transplanted to
immunodeficient mice [14]. Gao
(2012) also investigated the AN 3CA line and showed
that CD133+ cells express stem markers, demonstrate
greater mobility and invasive ability than CD133
cells
[15]. In
Friel's
work, the expression
of CD133
in
the cells of primary EC tumors and the mechanism for
����-���������� �������������� ������ 2024. �. 5, � 3. �. 16-30
���������
�.
�., ��������
�.
�., ���������
�.
�. , ��������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ��������
�.
�.,
������
�.
A., �������
�.
�.���� �������� ��������� ������� ���� ���������� � ������������ � ��� ������, ���������� ��������� ����������
��������� ������
controlling the expression of this marker in them were
investigated [16]. The authors
showed that
CD133+
cells accounted for 5.7�27.4 % of the total population
of tumor cells in the analyzed primary tumors. These
cells had increased tumorigenicity in immunodeficient
mice, which suggests that these cells belong
to the TSC. Similar results were obtained in the work
of Sun (2017), where CD133+CD44+ cells showed
a stronger association with all the classical properties
of TSC than for other markers studied in the
work, such as CD24, CD47, CD29, CXCR4, SSEA3 and
SSEA4. The
efficiency of spheroid formation in soft
agar was 11.7 % for CD133+ cells and 1.7 % for CD133
cells
[17]. In addition, CD133+CD44+ cells showed
an increased expression of stem cell transcription
factors Myc, Sox-2, Nanog and Oct4 compared with
other subpopulations [16], for which a direct relationship
with the degree of malignancy of endometrioid
carcinoma was
established [18].
Despite the established connection between
CD133 and EC TSC in a number
of studies,
data
on the relationship between the expression of this
marker and the prognosis of the disease course
remain quite contradictory. Thus, the work of Elbasateeny
(2016) indicates a more pronounced association
of CD133 expression with the early stage of the
tumor (I�II) and a decrease in the expression of this
marker at later stages of the disease. The authors
suggested that CD44 and CD133 may be involved in
the development of endometrial cancer in the early
stages, and their overexpression may contribute
to
the early
diagnosis of
endometrial cancer
[11].
These results are supported by the data obtained
in Mancebo (2017), in which the authors found that
tumors in which CD133 expression was high were
less likely to have vascular invasion and more likely
to be highly differentiated, and were also associated
with
higher overall
and recurrence-free
survival
[19].
However, there is also the opposite data. Thus, Nakamura
(2010) showed a negative correlation between
CD133 expression in tumor tissue and life
expectancy without
recurrence [20]. The negative
prognosis of the course of EC with increased CD133
expression
in
tumor tissue
was
confirmed
in
the
work of Park in 2019 [12]. The observed discrepancies
in the data of different authors may be related
to the fact that CD133 expression is observed not
only in the EC TSC, but also in normal cells of the
glandular epithelium of the
endometrium [21]. Thus,
CD133 in endometrial tissue can act simultaneous
ly as
a marker of epithelial differentiation and as
a marker
of OSC.
To study the dynamics, functioning and regulation
of stem cells, experimental methods are needed to
clearly distinguish between stem cells and their offspring.
Due to the lack of unique cell surface markers
specific
only to
stem
cells and a distinct morphological
phenotype,
stem
cells are usually identified
based on functional criteria. Stem cells from various
tissues are usually cultured in vitro in the form of
spheroids under
conditions excluding adhesion [22].
According to the literature data, the study of TSC in
EC by the method of counting spheroids in conditions
that do not support cell adhesion, both on simple
samples obtained after sorting by any marker [14,
17] and in whole samples of the primary culture of
EC [23]. In the latter case, the quantitative analysis
was reduced to measuring the size of spheroids,
while the assessment of the quantitative content of
TSC and the
establishment
of a link with
the
clinical
and pathological characteristics of the sample was
not carried out.
The purpose of the study: to study the possibility
of using the method of spheroid formation in culture
to assess the content of EC TSC in complex samples
containing various tumor cells and microenvironments.
To achieve this goal, we compared the
morphological characteristics of primary EC cultures
under conditions of adhesive growth and in soft agar,
and also studied the expression of the CD133 marker
in two-dimensional cultures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Nine primary cultures of EC were obtained from
fragments of tumors removed during surgery performed
as
the first
stage of the treatment
of EC.
Patients with EC were treated in the Oncological
Gynecology department of the National Medical Research
Centre for Oncology, in 2023. The histological
diagnosis was confirmed in the pathoanatomical
department of the of the National Medical Research
Centre for Oncology. The patients were aware of their
participation in the scientific study and signed an
informed consent for the collection of biological
material. The pathologist isolated a 0.5 cm3 fragment
corresponding to the malignant component
of the tumor within 20 minutes after extraction of
South Russian Journal of Cancer 2024. Vol. 5, No. 3. P. 16-30
Filippova S. Yu., Mezhevova I. V., Chembarova T. V. , Novikova I. A., Verenikina E. V., Zhenilo O. E., Polovodova V. V., Shaposhnikov A. V., Shalashnaya E. V., Maslov A. A.,
Ishonina O. G. Experience in creating primary cultures of endometrial cancer and studying cells carrying phenotype of cancer stem cells
the drug and placed it in a Hanks solution (Gibco,
USA) containing 1 % gentamicin (Biolot, Russia).
Next, the sample was fragmented with a scalpel to
a size of 1�2
mm3, after which 300 u/ml of collagenase
I (Thermo
Fisher
Scientific,
USA) was added
in a DMEM medium
(Biolot, Russia) and incubated
for an hour at a temperature of 37
�C with constant
stirring. At the end of fermentation, the sample was
additionally crushed by pipetting and passed through
a sterile nylon filter (d = 70
.m) (Beckton Dickinson,
USA). The resulting suspension was washed twice in
a phosphate buffer
and passed onto
a culture vial in
a DMEM medium containing 10
% FBS (Biolot, Russia)
and 1 % gentamicin and cultured under standard
conditions at 37 �C and 5.0
% CO2.
To study the ability of cells to spheroid formation,
a
two-dimensional
culture
was
removed
from culture
plastic
using a standard technique using a 0.1
%
trypsin solution (Biolot, Russia). The resulting cell
suspension was mixed with 0.35 % agarose solution
in a serum-free DMEM medium with the addition of
insulin-transferin and growth factors EGF (20 ng/ml)
and FGF (20 ng/ml) and layered on a base of 0.7
%
agarose in the same medium. In total, 2.0 . 104 cells
were
added
in
this
way to the
well
of a
6-hole
tablet.
There were 6 repetitions for each culture. The plates
with cells were cultured for 2 weeks, during which
time the spheroids were photographed. At the end of
cultivation, the average size was determined and the
spheroids
in
the
well
were
counted
using
a
Lionheart
FX imager (BioTek, USA) using embedded software.
The frequency of spheroid formation was calculated
as the ratio of the number of spheroids larger than
40 .m in diameter to the total number of cells passioned
into the well of the tablet.
To carry out immunophenotyping on CD133, primary
cultures were planted on cover glasses. After
the formation of the cellular monolayer, the glasses
were
fixed in a 4
% paraformaldehyde
solution for
15 minutes at room temperature, after which permeabilization
was
carried out
in
a
0.5
% Triton
X-100
solution on a phosphate buffer for 10
minutes. After
washing, the glass was blocked for an hour in
a solution of 5
%
normal goat serum
(Gibco, USA) in
a phosphate buffer, after which
it
was
kept
overnight
at 4
�C in a solution of primary polyclonal rabbit antibody
to CD133
(ab19898, Abcam, USA) in a phosphate
buffer (1/100 dilution) with the addition of 1 %
goat serum. After washing the glass three times, it
was kept at room temperature for an hour in a solution
of secondary goat antibody conjugated with
Alexa Flour�594 (ab150080, Abcam, USA) (1/500
dilution), after which they were washed with a phosphate
buffer,
repainted in a solution of
the nuclear
dye DAPI (ab228549, Abcam, USA) and mounted
on slides in an Anti-Fade Fluorescence Mounting
Medium (ab104135, Abcam, USA). The proportion
of CD133 positive cells was determined on the Lionheart
FX imager (BioTek, USA) using embedded
software. 3 glasses were examined for each culture.
The values of the diameter of the spheroids, the
frequency of spheroid formation and the proportion
of CD133+ cells are given as a sample mean � standard
deviation.
STUDY RESULTS
We received 9 primary cultures of EC from 9 patients
who were treated in the Department of Oncological
Gynecology at the of the National Medical
Research Centre for Oncology in 2023. The results
of the pathological examination showed that 2 tumors
belonged to the histological type of highly
differentiated (G1), 6 to moderately differentiated
(G2) and one tumor to the low�differentiated type
G3 of endometrioid adenocarcinomas. At the same
time, lympho-vascular invasion was detected in three
cases, but none of the patients had metastases in
regional lymph nodes. All cases were attributed to
stage I�II of the disease.
All primary cell cultures formed a monolayer
on
day 3 of cultivation under conditions that support
adhesion. The EC cells in the monolayer culture were
relatively small in size and polygonal in shape, often
forming "islands" and "rosettes" that were located
among the more elongated stroma cells, presumably
fibroblasts. When cultured in conditions that do not
support cell adhesion on agarose in the medium for
TSCs, the formation of spheroids was noted in 5 out
of 9 cultures, starting from the 5th day of cultivation.
In four other cultures, spheroids did not form
even after 2 weeks of cultivation. 1 culture obtained
from a highly differentiated tumor and 3 cultures
from moderately differentiated tumors did not form
spheroids. Thus, there was no obvious relationship
between the frequency of spheroid formation and
the degree of tumor differentiation. For cultures that
formed spheroids in soft agar, additional staining of
����-���������� �������������� ������ 2024. �. 5, � 3. �. 16-30
���������
�.
�., ��������
�.
�., ���������
�.
�. , ��������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ��������
�.
�.,
������
�.
A., �������
�.
�.���� �������� ��������� ������� ���� ���������� � ������������ � ��� ������, ���������� ��������� ����������
��������� ������
the two-dimensional culture on the CD133 marker
was performed.
EC cell culture No. 1. Highly differentiated G1 endometrioid
adenocarcinoma without signs of vascular
invasion. In the primary culture, single large cells
of polygonal or rounded shape were observed among
numerous elongated cells, presumably fibroblasts
(Fig. 1A).
CD133 expression is weak, and rare marker
granules are observed in all cells (Fig. 1b). The frequency
of CD133+ cells ranged from 0.2 to 1.0 %
(0.8
� 0.15
%). In
the
culture in
agarose, a very slow
growth of cellular spheroids from single large cells
was
observed. On
the
fifth
day of cultivation, spheroids
had not yet been detected (Fig. 1B), and two
weeks later small spheroids of 4�8 cells were formed
(Fig. 1G). The frequency of spheroid formation on
the 14th day ranged from 0.1
to 0.7
% (0.5
� 0.1
%).
EC cell culture No. 2. Low-grade G3 endometrioid
adenocarcinoma without signs of vascular invasion.
Under cultivation conditions supporting cell adhesion,
the cells of
the primary culture formed a monolayer
of two types of cells, similar in appearance to
the culture of EC No. 3 (Fig. 3A): small polygonal
cells united in islands among larger and elongated
cells similar to fibroblasts (Fig. 2A).
At the same time, islands of polygonal cells could
form spheroid-like structures, within which increased
CD133 expression was observed. Also, among the
monolayer, there were individual large cells expressing
CD133 above the general level (Fig. 2B). The
frequency of CD133+ cells ranged from 2.7 to 8.0 %
(4.8
� 1.5
%). On
the
fifth day of cultivation in
conditions
that do not support adhesion, in the medium
�C
B
D
Fig. 1. Primary culture of endometrial cancer No. 1. A � general view of monolayer culture; B � staining of monolayer culture on CD133;
C � view of cellular spheroids in agarose on the 5th day of cultivation. G � a type of cellular spheroids in agarose on the 14th day of
cultivation. The size of the scale ruler is 200
.m
South Russian Journal of Cancer 2024. Vol. 5, No. 3. P. 16-30
Filippova S. Yu., Mezhevova I. V., Chembarova T. V. , Novikova I. A., Verenikina E. V., Zhenilo O. E., Polovodova V. V., Shaposhnikov A. V., Shalashnaya E. V., Maslov A. A.,
Ishonina O. G. Experience in creating primary cultures of endometrial cancer and studying cells carrying phenotype of cancer stem cells
for TSC, the culture of EC No. 3 formed small cellu
lar spheroids
of 4�8
cells
with a frequency of about
15 % (Fig. 2B). Further, some of the cell spheroids
showed rapid growth and after two weeks of cultiva
tion reached 80�150 .m
in diameter (110.3 � 32.7
.m). The frequency of spheroid formation on the 14th
day ranged from 0.3
to 2.5
% (1.5
� 0.8
%)
(Fig. 2G).
EC cell culture No. 3. Moderately differentiated G2
endometrioid adenocarcinoma with signs of vascular
invasion. The
culture
in
the
monolayer had a
pronounced
division into small polygonal cells, united
into islands among larger and elongated cells similar
to fibroblasts (Fig. 3A).
Immunofluorescence staining showed an increased
content of the CD133 marker in small polygonal
cells, while individual cells showed a particularly
bright label (Fig. 3B). The frequency of CD133+
cells
ranged
from 5.8
to 16.9
% (11.2
� 5.2
%). When
grown
on
agarose
in
a
medium for TSC
on
the
5th
day in culture, about 15 % of the cells formed spher
oids 5�30 .m
in diameter (Fig. 3C). After
two weeks
of cultivation in agarose, individual cellular spheroids
increased in size to 30�150
.m in diameter, the remaining
spheroids degraded (98.3
� 51.4 .m). The
frequency of spheroid formation on day 14 ranged
from 0.3
to 10.1
% (5.7 � 4.1
%) (Fig. 3D).
EC cell culture No. 4. Moderately differentiated
G2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma without signs of
vascular invasion. In the monolayer culture, large polygonal
cells were observed separately or assembled
in small groups against the background of elongated
cells of various sizes (Fig. 4A).
When stained with the CD133 EC TSC marker,
a positive reaction was shown not only by large po
�C
B
D
Fig.
2.
Primary culture of
endometrial cancer
No.
2.
A
�
general view
of
the monolayer
culture;
B �
staining of
the monolayer
culture on
CD133; C � type of cellular spheroids in agarose on the 5th day of cultivation; D � type of cellular spheroids in agarose on the 14th day of
cultivation. The size of the scale ruler is 200
.m
����-���������� �������������� ������ 2024. �. 5, � 3. �. 16-30
���������
�.
�., ��������
�.
�., ���������
�.
�. , ��������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ��������
�.
�.,
������
�.
A., �������
�.
�.���� �������� ��������� ������� ���� ���������� � ������������ � ��� ������, ���������� ��������� ����������
��������� ������
lygonal cells and their clusters, but also by numerous
small elongated cells. Large multinucleated cells
positive for CD133 were also found in the preparation
(Fig. 4B). The frequency of CD133+ cells ranged
from 40.1
to 65.2
% (average
52.2
� 10.2
%). After
five days of cultivation in agarose, about 5�10
% of
the culture cells formed small loose spheroids of
4�16 cells (Fig. 4C), two weeks later the spheroids
increased to
20�80 .m
in diameter
(54.7 � 28.4 .m),
the frequency of spheroid formation on the 14th day
ranged from 2.1 to 8.4
% (5.1 � 2.7
%) (Fig. 4D)
EC Culture No. 5. Moderately differentiated G2
endometrioid adenocarcinoma without signs of vascular
invasion. In the monolayer culture, islands of
rather large polygonal cells of epithelial morphology
were found among elongated cells of stromal origin
(Fig. 5A).
The reaction to CD133 was similar to the
EC culture No. 2, namely, positive staining was
demonstrated by individual large cells of elongated
or epithelial
morphology with a certain group
of small elongated cells, which, due to staining,
stand out against the background of larger elongated
cells negative for CD133 (Fig. 5B). The frequency
of CD133+ cells ranged from 22.4 to 51.2 %
(35.5
� 12.7
%). On
the
fifth
day of cultivation
in
conditions that do not support adhesion, EC culture
No. 5 formed small cellular spheroids of 2�4 cells
with
a frequency of about
5
% (Fig. 5C). Further,
some of the cell spheroids showed rapid growth
and reached 30�80 .m
in diameter
after
two weeks
of cultivation (average 55.4 � 25.1 .m). The frequency
of spheroid formation on day 14 ranged
from 0.5
to 2.8
% (1.8
� 0.9
%)
(Fig. 5D).
�C
B
D
Fig.
3.
Primary culture of
endometrial cancer
No.
3.
A
�
general view
of
the monolayer
culture;
B �
staining of
the monolayer
culture on
CD133; C � type of cellular spheroids in agarose on the 5th day of cultivation; D � type of cellular spheroids in agarose on the 14th day of
cultivation. The size of the scale ruler is 200
.m
South Russian Journal of Cancer 2024. Vol. 5, No. 3. P. 16-30
Filippova S. Yu., Mezhevova I. V., Chembarova T. V. , Novikova I. A., Verenikina E. V., Zhenilo O. E., Polovodova V. V., Shaposhnikov A. V., Shalashnaya E. V., Maslov A. A.,
Ishonina O. G. Experience in creating primary cultures of endometrial cancer and studying cells carrying phenotype of cancer stem cells
The characteristics of primary EC cultures are
combined in the table (Table 1).
The lowest frequency of spheroid formation, as
well as the lowest frequency of CD133+ cells, were
observed in a culture obtained from a highly differentiated
tumor.
DISCUSSION
In all the obtained primary cultures, the presence
of a stromal component is noted, represented by
elongated cells of different sizes, demonstrating
a negative (No. 1, No. 2, No. 3) up to medium and
high CD133 expression (No. 4, No. 5). In addition, polygonal
cells are noted in cultures, which occur as islands
among stromal cells. Their sizes vary between
cultures, and on this basis, cultures can be divided
into two groups � including small polygonal cells that
assemble into dense colonies-"domes" (cultures No.
1 and No. 2), and including larger polygonal cells that
can
form flat
islands
of different
sizes
(cultures
No.
1, No. 4 and No. 5). The expression of the CD133
marker in these cells is quite pronounced, especially
against
the
background
of a
weakly colored
stromal
component consisting of large cells (cultures No. 4
and No. 5).
The presence of elongated or process-shaped
cells
resembling fibroblasts
in
primary EC
cultures
and capable of forming spheroids under conditions
that do not support cell adhesion was also noted in
the work of Helweg (2022) [23]. The picture of the
composition of cell cultures obtained by us is also
similar in cell morphology to the results obtained in
the work of Chan
et
al. (2004)
[24]. In
this
study, the
�C
B
D
Fig.
4.
Primary culture of
endometrial cancer
No.
4.
A
�
general view
of
the monolayer
culture;
B �
staining of
the monolayer
culture on
CD133; C � type of cellular spheroids in agarose on the 5th day of cultivation; D � type of cellular spheroids in agarose on the 14th day of
cultivation. The size of the scale ruler is 200
.m
����-���������� �������������� ������ 2024. �. 5, � 3. �. 16-30
���������
�.
�., ��������
�.
�., ���������
�.
�. , ��������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ��������
�.
�.,
������
�.
A., �������
�.
�.���� �������� ��������� ������� ���� ���������� � ������������ � ��� ������, ���������� ��������� ����������
��������� ������
�C
B
D
Fig. 5. Primary culture of endometrial cancer No. 5. A � general view of monolayer culture; B � staining of monolayer culture on CD133;
C � type of cellular spheroids
in
agarose on
the
5th day of cultivation; D
� type
of cellular spheroids
in
agarose
on
the
14th
day of cultivation.
The size of the scale ruler is 200 .m
Table 1. Summary characteristics of primary endometrial cancer cultures
Culture
No. Grade
Lympho-
vascular
invasion
Reaction to CD133, proportion of
CD133+ cells, mean � SD %
The frequency of
spheroids . 40.m per 14 days,
average � SD, %
The diameter of
the spheroids for
14 days, average
� SD, .m
No. 1 G1 n/p
No. 2 G3 n/p
No. 3 G2 p
No. 4 G2 n/p
No. 5 G2 n/p
Note: not present � n/p, present � p
0.8 � 0.15 %, weak reaction in some
large stromal cells, single polygonal
cells with bright coloration
4.8 � 1.5 %, small polygonal cells in
dense colonies, individual stromal cells
11.2 � 5.2 %, small polygonal cells in
dense colonies
52.2 � 10.2 %, polygonal process large
multinucleated cells, stromal small
elongated cells
35.5 � 12.7 %, separate large and small
elongated stromal cells, separate large
polygonal cells
0.5 � 0.1
1.5 � 0.8 %
5.7 � 4.1 %
5.1 � 2.7 %
1.8 � 0.9 %
20 � 10
110.3 � 32.7
98.3 � 51.4
54.7 � 28.4
55.4 � 25.1
25
South Russian Journal of Cancer 2024. Vol. 5, No. 3. P. 16-30
Filippova S. Yu., Mezhevova I. V., Chembarova T. V. , Novikova I. A., Verenikina E. V., Zhenilo O. E., Polovodova V. V., Shaposhnikov A. V., Shalashnaya E. V., Maslov A. A.,
Ishonina O. G. Experience in creating primary cultures of endometrial cancer and studying cells carrying phenotype of cancer stem cells
authors studied the behavior in culture of various
cells of the normal human endometrium isolated
from the
epithelial
and basal
layers
[24]. According
to the authors, the epithelial layer gave two groups
of polygonal cells � small cells that gather in close
colonies
with a high ability to proliferate, and larger
cells that form looser colonies on cultural plastic.
The stromal component of endometrial tissue con
sisted of two types
of elongated cells: large
loosely
lying cells and small closely lying cells, giving curls in
a monolayer. In
addition, human
endometrial
stromal
cells were positively stained for
fibroblast markers
(CD90, 5B5, type
I collagen), which
confirms
the
relationship
of these
cells
to fibroblasts
and, possibly,
myofibroblasts, which express
markers
of both fibroblasts
and smooth muscle cells. Thus, based on the
picture of the two-dimensional culture obtained in our
work, it is impossible to unambiguously identify which
cells belong to the TSC, since externally they are little
distinguishable from normal endometrial cells.
The expression of the TSC CD133 marker in the
cultures obtained by us ranged from 0.8 to 52.2 %
on average. The data obtained go beyond the range
of 5.7�27.4
% indicated by other authors [16, 17].
A nonlinear relationship
between
CD133
expression
and the degree of tumor differentiation was also
revealed � both high and low differentiation were
associated with reduced immunoreactivity on CD133
compared with average differentiation. No connection
was found between the level of CD133 expression,
the degree of differentiation and other clinical
and pathological characteristics of the tumor also
in Nakamura [20]. CD133
is known to occur in normal
differentiated endometrial cells. Thus, based on
existing data, it is impossible to determine to what
extent CD133
expression reflects the degree of cell
malignancy in primary EC cultures and the level of
their differentiation. To solve this problem, more extensive
studies
are
required, including a comparison
of normal endometrial tissue and RE.
The frequency of spheroid formation in our cultures
ranged from 0.5 to 5.7 % on average. It is
known that the frequency of cells with SC properties
in the normal endometrium is 0.02�0.1
% [24].
It
would not
be
too much
of an
assumption
to accept
these levels as indicative for estimating the frequency
of spheroid formation in cultures of normal endometrium.
In the scientific
literature, we have not
found data on the frequency of spheroid formation in
conditions that do not support cell adhesion in whole
EC
cultures, since
individual
subpopulations
purified
by marker expression or nuclear dye retention are
usually the object of research. However, taking into
account the fact that the frequency of spheroid formation
is the highest among CD133+ EC cells and
amounts
to 11.7
% in
this
subpopulation
[17], as
well
as the fact that the total content of these cells in EC
ranges from
5.7 to
27.4
%
[16],
we can multiply these
indicators to obtain an approximate the frequency of
spheroid formation in a mixed culture of EC, which
in this case will be 0.7�3.2 %. Thus, our results lie in
the range corresponding to the known data on EC,
therefore, the main part of the spheroids in our cultures
is presumably formed by malignant cells with
the TSC phenotype.
Our data show that in EC cultures, the overall re
sponse to CD133
does
not
show a clear relationship
with the frequency of spheroid formation. Thus, in
cultures No. 4 and No. 5, the frequency of spheroid
formation is an order of magnitude lower than the
content of CD133+ cells. In this regard, the question
arises as to which cells are the sources of spheroids
in EC cultures? Comparison with the morphological
features and phenotype of the normal endometri
um [21, 24, 25] indicates
a
number of patterns. Thus,
in culture No. 1,
obtained from
a highly differentiated
tumor, in a monolayer we see large cells similar to
the limited dividing progenitor cells of the stromal
and epithelial components of the normal endome
trium
[24]. The expression of the CD133 marker
in
these cells is very weak, while this culture formed
small lymphoid (loose) spheroids on soft agar with
a frequency of less than 1
%. Lymphoid colonies in
conditions that do not support adhesion can form
immune cells, namely, T lymphocytes and NK in the
presence of specific cytokines such as IL-2, IL-15 or
IL-7
[26]. Nevertheless, their characteristic appearance
can be considered a reliable difference between
lymphocytes and other cells � even in a stimulated
state, these
are
small
cells
(6�15
.m)
with
a high
nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio [27]. In our case, the cells
in the colonies have larger
sizes (about 40 .m
in
diameter), which means that they are not lympho
cytes with a high probability. At the same time, the
spheroids of culture No. 1 are similar to the lymphoid
colonies that were obtained from the EC tissue in
Tabuchi's work [28].
Culture No.
2,
obtained from
a low-grade tumor (G3), also contains cd133
fibro
����-���������� �������������� ������ 2024. �. 5, � 3. �. 16-30
���������
�.
�., ��������
�.
�., ���������
�.
�. , ��������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ��������
�.
�.,
������
�.
A., �������
�.
�.���� �������� ��������� ������� ���� ���������� � ������������ � ��� ������, ���������� ��������� ����������
��������� ������
blast-like
cells, however, a subpopulation
of small
polygonal cells stands out well against their background,
demonstrating bright immunoreactivity on
CD133, which morphologically most resembles cells
with stem
properties,
in the work of Chan et al. [24].
Also in this culture, when grown on soft agar, large
(about
90
.m in diameter)
spheroids
were observed,
albeit with a small frequency (about 1.5
%). Despite
the fact that no special marker selection was car
ried out, it would be a small assumption to assume
that these CD133+ cells form spheroids, since large
fibroblast-like cd133
cells did not produce similar
large
spheroids
in
culture
No. 1. Confirmation
of this
assumption may also be the fact that culture No. 3,
similar
in phenotype to
culture No. 2,
with a subpopulation
of small CD133+ cells forming dense colonies
clearly standing out against the background of
a weakly colored stromal component,
also
formed
large (about 115 .m in diameter) spheroids in soft
agar with a frequency of about 10
%. Another source
of spheroids may be small spindle-shaped cells
brightly colored on CD133, found in cultures No. 5
and No. 4. The morphological features of these cells
correspond to tissue stem cells, of which CD133 express,
for example, epithelial or endothelial SC, which
are normally present in the endometrium [30, 31].
According to the literature data, the size and appearance
of colonies formed on soft agar by such normal
stem cells do not differ from spheroids obtained
from TSC [31]. Finally, for a subpopulation of relatively
large polygonal CD133+ cells that are present in
cultures No. 4 and No. 5, the connection with spheroids
cannot be traced, although these cells can be
confidently attributed to the malignant component,
since they sometimes show signs of multinucleation.
It can also not be argued that CD133-negative cells
do not produce spheroids on soft agar, since in the
work of Ding [29], in particular, they showed that both
CD133+ and CD133 cells sorted from endometrial
tumor tissue by this marker can form spheroids, but
in the second case less effectively.
Thus, it is impossible to unambiguously determine
which of the cells of the primary EC cultures obtained
by us took part in the formation of spheroids. Some
presumptive relationship can be established only
for small epithelial and fibroblast-like CD133+ cells,
of which
only the
first
can
be
conditionally classified
as
malignant. To identify exactly TSC
EC, it
is
necessary to
conduct a comparative study of cell
cultures on soft agar obtained from tumor tissue
and the corresponding normal tissue, in combination
with cell sorting using markers CD133, CD44, CD117,
CD24, CD47 and others, for which a connection with
TSC and normal stromal stem cells has been established
[32].
CONCLUSION
We were able to obtain and characterize the culture
of cellular spheroids from the postoperative EC
material. However, the indicators of the frequency
of spheroid formation and the average size of spheroids
in this culture cannot serve as a marker of the
amount of TSC in tumor tissue without comparing
these data for tumor tissue and normal endometrium.
A
more detailed study of the cellular
subpopulations
of EC in comparison with normal endometrium
is required to establish a link between the observed
diversity of cells in culture and their ability to spheroid
formation and other characteristics of TSCs.
References
1.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates
of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185
Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209�249.
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
2. The state of cancer care for the Russian population in 2022. Edited by A. D. Kaprin, V. V. Starinsky, A. O. Shakhzadova Moscow:
P. A. Herzen MNIOI � Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, 2022, 239 p. (In Russ.).
3.
Giannone G, Attademo L, Scotto G, Genta S, Ghisoni E, Tuninetti V, et al. Endometrial Cancer Stem Cells: Role, Characterization
and Therapeutic Implications. Cancers (Basel).
2019 Nov 19;11(11):1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11111820
4.
Walcher L, Kistenmacher AK, Suo H, Kitte R, Dluczek S, Strau. A, et al. Cancer Stem Cells-Origins and Biomarkers: Perspectives
for Targeted Personalized Therapies. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1280. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01280
South Russian Journal of Cancer 2024. Vol. 5, No. 3. P. 16-30
Filippova S. Yu., Mezhevova I. V., Chembarova T. V. , Novikova I. A., Verenikina E. V., Zhenilo O. E., Polovodova V. V., Shaposhnikov A. V., Shalashnaya E. V., Maslov A. A.,
Ishonina O. G. Experience in creating primary cultures of endometrial cancer and studying cells carrying phenotype of cancer stem cells
5.
Hubbard SA, Friel AM, Kumar B, Zhang L, Rueda BR, Gargett CE. Evidence for cancer stem cells in human endometrial carcinoma.
Cancer Res. 2009 Nov 1;69(21):8241�8248. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4808
6.
Rahadiani N, Ikeda J ichiro, Mamat S, Matsuzaki S, Ueda Y, Umehara R, et al. Expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1
(ALDH1)
in endometrioid adenocarcinoma and its clinical implications. Cancer Sci. 2011
Apr;102(4):903�908.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01864.x
7.
Lennartsson J, Ronnstrand L. Stem cell factor receptor/c-Kit: from basic science to clinical implications. Physiol Rev. 2012
Oct;92(4):1619�1649. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00046.2011
8.
Zhang X, Kyo S, Nakamura M, Mizumoto Y, Maida Y, Bono Y, et al. Imatinib sensitizes endometrial cancer cells to cisplatin
by targeting CD117-positive growth-competent cells. Cancer Lett. 2014 Apr 1;345(1):106�114.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2013.11.020
9. Saygin C, Wiechert A, Rao VS, Alluri R, Connor E, Thiagarajan PS, et al. CD55 regulates self-renewal and cisplatin resistance
in endometrioid tumors. J Exp Med. 2017
Sep 4;214(9):2715�2732. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20170438
10.
Hassn Mesrati M, Syafruddin SE,
Mohtar
MA, Syahir A.
CD44: A Multifunctional Mediator
of Cancer Progression. Biomolecules.
2021
Dec 9;11(12):1850. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11121850
11. Elbasateeny SS, Salem AA, Abdelsalam WA, Salem RA. Immunohistochemical expression of cancer stem cell related markers
CD44
and
CD133
in
endometrial
cancer.
Pathol
Res
Pract.
2016
Jan;212(1):10�16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2015.10.008
12.
Park JY, Hong D, Park JY. Association between Morphological Patterns of Myometrial Invasion and Cancer Stem Cell Markers
in Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res. 2019 Jan;25(1):123�130.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-017-0320-5
13.
Grabovenko FI, Kisil OV, Pavlova GV, Zvereva ME. Protein CD133
as a tumor stem cell marker. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery.
2022;86(6):113�120. (In Russ.). 2022;86(6):113�120. https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro202286061113, EDN: FYRKWQ
14. Rutella S, Bonanno G, Procoli A, Mariotti A, Corallo M, Prisco MG, et al. Cells with characteristics of cancer stem/progenitor
cells express the CD133 antigen in human endometrial tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Jul 1;15(13):4299�311.
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1883
15.
Gao Y, Liu T, Cheng W, Wang H. Isolation and characterization of proliferative, migratory and multidrug-resistant endometrial
carcinoma-initiating
cells
from
human
type
II
endometrial
carcinoma
cell
lines.
Oncol
Rep.
2012
Aug;28(2):527�532.
https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2012.1807
16.
Friel AM, Zhang L, Curley MD, Therrien VA, Sergent PA, Belden SE, et al. Epigenetic regulation of CD133
and tumorigenicity
of CD133 positive and negative endometrial cancer cells. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010 Dec 1;8:147.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-147
17.
Sun Y, Yoshida T, Okabe M, Zhou K, Wang F, Soko C, et al. Isolation of Stem-Like Cancer Cells in Primary Endometrial Cancer
Using Cell Surface Markers CD133 and CXCR4. Transl Oncol. 2017 Dec;10(6):976�987.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2017.07.007
18. Kutilin D.S., Nikitin I.S., Kit O.I. Features of some transcription factors gene expression in the malignancy tissues of the corpus
uteri. Advances in Molecular Oncology. 2019;6(1):57�62. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17650/2313-805X-2019-6-1-57-62,
EDN: KWOXFG
19. Mancebo G, Sole-Sedeno JM, Pino O, Miralpeix E, Mojal S, Garrigos L, et al. Prognostic impact of CD133 expression in Endometrial
Cancer Patients. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 9;7(1):7687. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08048-0
20.
Nakamura M, Kyo S, Zhang B, Zhang X, Mizumoto Y, Takakura M, et al. Prognostic impact of CD133
expression as a tumor-
initiating cell marker in endometrial cancer. Hum Pathol. 2010 Nov;41(11):1516�1529.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2010.05.006
21. Karbanova J, Missol-Kolka E, Fonseca AV, Lorra C, Janich P, Hollerova H, et al. The stem cell marker CD133 (Prominin-1) is
expressed in various human glandular epithelia. J Histochem Cytochem. 2008 Nov;56(11):977�993.
https://doi.org/10.1369/jhc.2008.951897
22.
Pastrana E, Silva-Vargas V, Doetsch F. Eyes wide open: a critical review of sphere-formation as an assay for stem cells. Cell
Stem Cell. 2011 May 6;8(5):486�498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2011.04.007
23. Helweg LP, Windmoller BA, Burghardt L, Storm J, Forster C, Wethkamp N, et al. The Diminishment of Novel Endometrial Carcinoma-
Derived Stem-like Cells by Targeting Mitochondrial Bioenergetics and MYC. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Feb 22;23(5):2426.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052426
����-���������� �������������� ������ 2024. �. 5, � 3. �. 16-30
���������
�.
�., ��������
�.
�., ���������
�.
�. , ��������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ����������
�.
�., ��������
�.
�.,
������
�.
A., �������
�.
�.���� �������� ��������� ������� ���� ���������� � ������������ � ��� ������, ���������� ��������� ����������
��������� ������
24. Chan RW, Schwab KE, Gargett CE. Clonogenicity of human endometrial epithelial and stromal cells. Biol Reprod. 2004
Jun;70(6):1738-50.
https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.024109
25.
Schwab KE, Hutchinson P, Gargett CE. Identification of surface markers for prospective isolation of human endometrial
stromal colony-forming cells. Hum Reprod. 2008
Apr;23(4):934�943. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den051
26.
Sitkovskaya A�, Zlatnik EYu, Filippova SYu, Bondarenko ES, Vaschenko LN, Kechedzhieva �� et al. Effect of interleukins 2,
7, 15 on the proliferation of natural killers in vitro. Russian Journal of Biotherapy. 2021;20(1):56-66. (In Russ.).
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9784-2021-20-1-56-66, EDN: SKZQFC
27.
Khaitov R. M. Immunology: textbook. 2nd ed. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2015, 528
p. (In Russ.).
28.
Tabuchi Y, Hirohashi Y, Hashimoto S, Mariya T, Asano T, Ikeo K, et al. Clonal analysis revealed functional heterogeneity in
cancer stem-like cell phenotypes in uterine endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Exp Mol Pathol. 2019
Feb;106:78�88.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexmp.2018.11.013
29.
Ding DC, Liu HW, Chang YH, Chu TY. Expression of CD133
in endometrial cancer cells and its implications. J Cancer.
2017;8(11):2142�2153. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.18869
30.
Tarnok A, Ulrich H, Bocsi J. Phenotypes of stem cells from diverse origin. Cytometry A. 2010 Jan;77(1):6�10.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20844
31. Ulrich D, Tan KS, Deane J, Schwab K, Cheong A, Rosamilia A, et al. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells in post-menopausal
endometrium. Hum Reprod. 2014 Sep;29(9):1895�1905. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu159
32.
Fraszczak K, Barczynski B. Characteristics of Cancer Stem Cells and Their Potential Role in Endometrial Cancer. Cancers
(Basel). 2024 Mar 7;16(6):1083. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16061083
Information about authors:
Svetlana Yu. Filippova � research fellow at the Laboratory
of Cellular Technologies, National Medical Research Centre for Oncology, Rostov-on-Don,
Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4558-5896, SPIN: 9586-2785, AuthorID: 878784, ResearcherID: AAH-4408-2020, Scopus
Author ID: 57189618843
Irina V. Mezhevova � junior research fellow at the Laboratory of Cellular Technologies, National Medical Research Centre for Oncology,
Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7902-7278, SPIN: 3367-1741, AuthorID: 1011695, ResearcherID: AAI-1860-2019
Tatiana V. Chembarova � junior research fellow at the Laboratory of Cellular Technologies, National Medical Research Centre for Oncology,
Rostov- on-Don, Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4555-8556, SPIN: 5426-1873, AuthorID: 1051985, ResearcherID: AAR-3198-2021, Scopus
Author ID: 57221303597
Inna A. Novikova �
Dr. Sci. (Med.),
Deputy General Director
for Science,
National Medical Research Centre
for Oncology,
Rostov-on-Don,
Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6496-9641, SPIN: 4810-2424, AuthorID: 726229, ResearcherID: E-7710-2018, Scopus Author ID: 57202252773
Ekaterina V. Verenikina � Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Oncological Gynecology, National Medical Research Centre for Oncology,
Rostov- on-Don, Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1084-5176, SPIN: 6610-7824, AuthorID: 734269, Scopus Author ID: 57194271506
Oksana E. Zhenilo � Cand. Sci. (Med.), MD, physician oncologist at the Department of Oncological Gynecology, National Medical Research Centre
for Oncology, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9833-8530, SPIN: 4078-7080, AuthorID: 732220
Veronika V. Polovodova � PhD student, National Medical Research Centre for Oncology, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8863-6229, SPIN: 3051-4734, AuthorID: 1214151
Alexander V. Shaposhnikov � Dr. Sci. (Med.), MD, professor, chief researcher at the Thoracoabdominal Department, National Medical Research
Centre for Oncology, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6881-2281, SPIN: 8756-9438, AuthorID: 712823
South Russian Journal of Cancer 2024. Vol. 5, No. 3. P. 16-30
Filippova S. Yu., Mezhevova I. V., Chembarova T. V. , Novikova I. A., Verenikina E. V., Zhenilo O. E., Polovodova V. V., Shaposhnikov A. V., Shalashnaya E. V., Maslov A. A.,
Ishonina O. G. Experience in creating primary cultures of endometrial cancer and studying cells carrying phenotype of cancer stem cells
Elena V. Shalashnaya � Cand. Sci. (Biol.), senior researcher at the Laboratory
for the Study
of the Malignant Tumors
Pathogenesis, National Medical
Research Centre for Oncology, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7742-4918, SPIN: 2752-0907, AuthorID: 476958, ResearcherID: AAE-4085-2022, Scopus
Author ID: 55144159900
Andrey
A. Maslov
� Dr. Sci. (Med.), MD, professor, chief physician, National Medical Research Centre for Oncology, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7328-8074, SPIN: 5963-5915, AuthorID: 817983
Oksana G. Ishonina � Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Head of the Department of Training and Retraining of Specialists, National Medical Research Centre for
Oncology, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5300-1213, SPIN: 4051-5165, AuthorID: 612417, Scopus Author ID: 37115461900
Contribution of the authors:
Filippova S. Yu. � concept and study design, manuscript writing, interpretation of results;
Mezhevova I. V. � conducting the experiment;
Chembarova T. V. � technical editing of the manuscript;
Novikova I. A. � scientific editing of the article;
Verenikina E. V. � provision of biological patient material;
Zhenilo O. E. � provision of biological patient material;
Polovodova V. V. � provision of biological patient material;
Shaposhnikov A. V. � scientific editing of the article;
Shalashnaya E. V. � scientific editing of the article;
Maslov A. A. � scientific editing of the article;
Ishonina O. G. � scientific editing of the article.