Научная статья на тему 'Evaluation of Chlorophyll fluorescence and Biochemical traits of lettuce under drought stress and super absorbent or bentonite application'

Evaluation of Chlorophyll fluorescence and Biochemical traits of lettuce under drought stress and super absorbent or bentonite application Текст научной статьи по специальности «Сельское хозяйство, лесное хозяйство, рыбное хозяйство»

CC BY
563
134
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Ключевые слова
WATER DEFICIT STRESS / SYNTHETIC SUPERABSORBENT / NATURAL SUPERABSORBENT / CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE INDICATORS

Аннотация научной статьи по сельскому хозяйству, лесному хозяйству, рыбному хозяйству, автор научной работы — Ghale Beig Akram Valizadeh, Neamati Seyyed Hossein, Tehranifar Ali, Emami Hojat

The effects of two superabsorbents (natural-bentonite) and (synthetic-A 200) on the chlorophyll fluorescence index, proline accumulation, phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and total carbohydrate in lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.) was evaluated. For this purpose, a factorial experiment using completely randomized design with superabsorbents at 3 levels (0, 0.15, 0.30 w/w%), drought stress at 2 levels (60 and 100% of field capacity) and 4 replicates was conducted. Results showed that photosystem photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) II under drought stress (60% FC) as well as lower levels of bentonite superabsorbent polymer reduced. The minimum and maximum proline content were obtained in 0.3% bentonite, 100% FC and 0 benetonite, 60% FC, respectively. The lowest and highest phenolic compounds was corresponded to the highest levels in both super absorbents and control respectively, so that the super absorbent and bentonite, reduced phenolic compounds by 62.65 and 66.21% compared to control. 0 and 0.15 wt % bentonite in high drought stress (60% FC) showed the highest and 0.3 wt % bentonite and 100% FC attained the lowest level of antioxidant activity. Control bentonite treatment beds at 60% FC and beds containing 0.3 wt. % bentonite in 100% FC, showed the lowest and the highest total carbohydrate content respectively. Results of this study indicate that bentonite can reduce the negative effects of drought stress similar to artificial super absorbent.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «Evaluation of Chlorophyll fluorescence and Biochemical traits of lettuce under drought stress and super absorbent or bentonite application»

Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry, Vol. 10 No. 1 2014, pp. 301-315 ISSN 1997-0838 Original Text Copyright © 2014 by Ghale Beig, Neamati, Tehranifar and Emami

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Biochemical Traits of Lettuce under Drought Stress and Super Absorbent or Bentonite Application

Akram Valizadeh Ghale Beig x*, Seyyed Hossein Neamati \ Ali Tehranifar \ Hojat Emami 2

1 Horticultural Sciences Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Soil Science Department, Agricultural College, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Tel.: +989157165175 *E-Mail: vali7.adeh8248@gmail.com

Received November 26, 2013

The effects of two superabsorbents (natural-bentonite) and (synthetic-A 200) on the chlorophyll fluorescence index, proline accumulation, phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and total carbohydrate in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) was evaluated. For this purpose, a factorial experiment using completely randomized design with superabsorbents at 3 levels (0, 0.15, 0.30 w/w%), drought stress at 2 levels (60 and 100% of field capacity) and 4 replicates was conducted. Results showed that photosystem photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) II under drought stress (60% FC) as well as lower levels of bentonite superabsorbent polymer reduced. The minimum and maximum proline content were obtained in 0.3% bentonite, 100% FC and 0 benetonite, 60% FC, respectively. The lowest and highest phenolic compounds was corresponded to the highest levels in both super absorbents and control respectively, so that the super absorbent and bentonite, reduced phenolic compounds by 62.65 and 66.21% compared to control. 0 and 0.15 wt % bentonite in high drought stress (60% FC) showed the highest and 0.3 wt % bentonite and 100% FC attained the lowest level of antioxidant activity. Control bentonite treatment beds at 60% FC and beds containing 0.3 wt. % bentonite in 100% FC, showed the lowest and the highest total carbohydrate content respectively. Results of this study indicate that bentonite can reduce the negative effects of drought stress similar to artificial super absorbent.

Key words: water deficit stress, synthetic superabsorbent, natural superabsorbent, Chlorophyll

fluorescence indicators

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Biochemical Traits of Lettuce under Drought Stress and Super Absorbent or Bentonite Application

Akram Valizadeh Ghale Beig 1*, Seyyed Hossein Neamati 1, Ali Tehranifar 1, Hojat Emami 2

1 Horticultural Sciences Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Soil Science Department, Agricultural College, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Tel.: +989157165175 *E-Mail: vali7.adeh8248@gmail.com

Received November 26, 2013

The effects of two superabsorbents (natural-bentonite) and (synthetic-A 200) on the chlorophyll fluorescence index, proline accumulation, phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and total carbohydrate in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) was evaluated. For this purpose, a factorial experiment using completely randomized design with superabsorbents at 3 levels (0, 0.15, 0.30 w/w%), drought stress at 2 levels (60 and 100% of field capacity) and 4 replicates was conducted. Results showed that photosystem photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) II under drought stress (60% FC) as well as lower levels of bentonite superabsorbent polymer reduced. The minimum and maximum proline content were obtained in 0.3% bentonite, 100% FC and 0 benetonite, 60% FC, respectively. The lowest and highest phenolic compounds was corresponded to the highest levels in both super absorbents and control respectively, so that the super absorbent and bentonite, reduced phenolic compounds by 62.65 and 66.21% compared to control. 0 and 0.15 wt % bentonite in high drought stress (60% FC) showed the highest and 0.3 wt % bentonite and 100% FC attained the lowest level of antioxidant activity. Control bentonite treatment beds at 60% FC and beds containing 0.3 wt. % bentonite in 100% FC, showed the lowest and the highest total carbohydrate content respectively. Results of this study indicate that bentonite can reduce the negative effects of drought stress similar to artificial super absorbent.

Key words: water deficit stress, synthetic superabsorbent, natural superabsorbent, Chlorophyll

fluorescence indicators

Water forms the main factor concerning efficiency per unit water (Koochaki and Alizadeh,

oriented agriculture in arid regions, thus the 1986). Hence, the management of some of

convergence of all agricultural operations must be modifying additives such as super absorbent

used to optimize water utilization and to maximize hydrogel in order to optimize the use of water in

agriculture to increase crop yield under drought conditions is of particular importance. Super absorbent polymer hydrogel are extremely hydrophilic and with high speed of water absorption and capacity, it provides water and nutrients for roots if required easily. These super absorbents which exist in natural and artificial forms are odorless and safe compounds for environment and plant tissue (Kabiri, 2005). Bentonite belongs to a group of super absorbent natural mineral 1:2 and is a mixture of clay minerals with high montmorillonite contents. It also shows high adhesion ability (Abedi-koupai and Sohrab, 2004). Due to the structure of the material, bentonite has the ability to absorb water and minerals, and also prevents the leaching of minerals from the soil, thus improves soil fertility (Stejskal. 1996). Further researches indicate that water limitation leads to photosynthesis decline and growth reduction which itself can perform in terms of lower yields (Cronic and Massacci, 1996). Photosynthesis reduction under drought stress in related to clutter biochemical pathways. Photosystem II is the most sensitive part to drought stress and oxygen receiving complex tension and recipient of the reaction center complexes in the system faces the greatest damage from drought (Giardi, 1996). Today, chlorophyll fluorescence is proposed as an index to measure the effects of environmental stresses, including water stress on crop species and determination of their drought resistance (Moffatt et al., 1990). In other words, chlorophyll fluorescence measurement proves the intact membranes of tylacoeids and shows the relative efficiency of electron transfer from the photosystem II to photosystem I. The lowest fluorescence of the system (Fo), appears when first Kinnon Primary quinone electron acceptor of

photosystem II, is at fully oxidized state (open state photosystem reaction center II), and it increases gradually with reduction. This process will continue until full recovery of its molecules. In case of full reduction of the photosystem center, the highest fluorescence will show (Fm). Drought stress in fact by affecting carbon replication negatively reduces electron compliance and transport capacity and the system will reach (Fm) state faster resulting in varied fluorescence (Fv) decline. However, with increasing light intensity, the photosynthetic system loses the excess energy through non-photochemical blackouts via non-radiation process using a reducing energy regulation induced stimulation method. With this regulating mechanism, while protecting the reaction center, which causes the least damage to the center (Bhardway and Singhal, 1981). Hence photosystem II photochemical efficiency is expressed as the Fv/Fm ratio (the ratio of variable fluorescence to maximum fluorescence). Therefore, environmental stresses reduce this ratio by concerning photosystem II (Ma et al., 1995). One of the evaluation criteria for choosing varieties under drought stress is proline accumulation in various plant organs (Leinhose and Bergman, 1995). When plants are subjected to drought stress, increased protein breakdown and amino acid amides is accelerated. One of these amino acids is proline (Barker et al., 1993). Osmoregulation is a physiological process during which the accumulation of a series of plant material in cells, increases osmotic potential of the tissue under stress and the plant remains in a desirable state. Most of these compounds are amino acid and sugar. Proline and soluble sugar accumulation in plants as a defense mechanism are important in osmoregulation (Irigoyen et al, 1992). Increased proline and carbohydrates have been reported in

German chamomile in response of decreased soil moisture (Arazmjo et al., 2009). On the other hand, it seems that the phenolic compounds widely found in plants with high antioxidant activity are mainly gained from plant extracts (Bahramikia and Yazdanparast, 2008; Chatchawan et al., 2008; Karpinska et al., 2001; Candan et al., 2003; Senji and Yuuya, 2008; Yadegarinia et al., 2006; Muret et al. 2007). The key role of phenolic compounds as lubricants eliminating free radicals has been

reported in several articles (Katalinic et al., 2006; Theriault et al., 2006; Aeschbach et al., 1994). It should be noted that phenolic compounds can effectively act as a hydrogen donor thus effectively act as an antioxidant (Golluce et al., 2007). Starch and sucrose metabolic products as mediators of glycolysis fatty acids for the production of carbon skeletons for construction and nucleotides go to work (Dennis et al., 2000; Kafi et al., 2009).

Researchers found a high correlation between the accumulation of soluble sugars (sucrose, glucose and fructose) and drought tolerance in plants

(Hoekstra and Buitink, 2001; Crowe et al., 1990;

Ritchie et al., 1990). Chlorophyll fluorescence, proline content, phenolic compounds, antioxidant capacity and total carbohydrates, are among factors showed changes under drought stress and plant growth and yield can by affected by them. So to evaluate growing response of lettuceunder drought stress using two kinds of super absorbent natural and artificial, an experiment was conducted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To evaluate the effect of drought stress, super absorbent and bentonite on chlorophyll fluorescence index, shoot proline accumulation, phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity, and total carbohydrate of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), a factorial trial based on a completely randomized

design with 4 replicates was conducted in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad during 2012-2013 in greenhouse conditions. Pots with 25 cm height and 30 cm width were used and after weighing each pot, they were filled with a mixture of surface soil and sand (2:1). Soil test analysis results indicated a sandy loam type and moisture content at field capacity and permanent wilting point were determined 24.4 and 12.5%, respectively (Table 1). A 200 superabsorbent at 3 levels (S0(0), S1(0.15), S2(0.3) w/w% equal to 0, 15, 30 g/10 kg soil per pot) and bentonite (B0(0), B1(0.15), B2(0.3) w/w % equal to 0, 15, 30 g/10 kg soil per pot) was mixed with the soil. Characteristics of the bentonite used are shown in Table 2. Lactuca sativa L. cv Siaho seeds were used for seedling production in this experiment and were transplanted to trial pots at 4-leaf stage. Full irrigation (100% FC) was performed up to 6-8 leaf stage to ensure establishment and deployment of transplants, by then drought stress treatments in two levels 60% (DS1) and 100% (DS2) was applied using field capacity method via daily weighing. Finally chlorophyll fluorescence, shoot proline content, phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and total carbohydrate were measured.

Chlorophyll fluorescence indices: Chlorophyll fluorescence index (Fo, Fm, Fv, Fv/Fm) was measured using a strain gauge (Plant stress meter). Leaves darkness adaptation for 30 min, illumination device 400 microeinstein per square meter per second and irradiation time was set at 2 seconds.

Proline content: The proline content was estimated by the method of Bates et al. (1973). The plant material was homogenized in 3% aqueous sulfosalicylic acid and the homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm. The supernatant was used for the estimation of the proline content. The reaction mixture consisted of 2 ml of acid ninhydrin

and 2 ml of glacial acetic acid, which was boiled at 100 °C for 1 h. After termination of reaction in ice bath, the reaction mixture was extracted with 6 ml of toluene, and absorbance was read at 520 nm.

Total phenolic compounds: The amount of total phenolic compounds in plant extract samples was measured by the method of Folin Sykaltv (McDonald et al., 2001). According to this method, the test tube to 0.1 ml of ethanol extract (at a concentration of 1 mg/mL) or gallic acid standard ethanol solution (concentration from 25-300 ^g) 5 ml Folin Sykaltv reagent (diluted with distilled water at 1:10) and 4ml sodium bicarbonate 7.5% was added and mixed. After 30 minutes at ambient temperature of the laboratory, spectrophotometer (Farmasya K L model of SPECT II Nova of England) absorption at 765 nm was recorded. Amounts of total phenol extract samples were determined using the standard curve in terms of mg gallic acid per gram of extract.

Measurement of antioxidant activity by DPPH: Antioxidant activity was estimated by the method of Abe et al. (1998). 100 mg of fresh plant material was extracted by methanol 99% (v/v %). Extract were then centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 5 minutes and DPPH solution was added. After an incubation period of 30 min at 250C, the absorbance at 517 nm was recorded. The free radical-scavenging activity of each solution was then calculated as percent inhibition according to the following equation:

% inhibition= (A blank - A sample)/A blank x 100 Total carbohydrates: 500 mg of fresh leaf samples were weighted and extracted with 10 ml methanol 99% (v/v %). Extracts were then centrifuged for at 3500 rpm for 15 minutes. 3 ml of Anthron indicator was added to the prepared samples at this stage and then they were boiled at 100 0C for 10 minutes. The absorbance read was

630 nm (Hedge and Hofreiter, 1962).

Statistical analysis: This experiment was

conducted as a factorial experiment based on completely randomized design. Data were analyzed as factorial ANOVAs using SAS Version 9.1. Where significant (P<0.05) treatment effects were determined by ANOVA, data means were separated by the LSD test.

RESULTS

Chlorophyll fluorescence indices

Results of variance analysis showed that water restrictions have a significant effect on all traits of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and their interactions (P<0.01) (Table 3). The difference between Fo and Fm (Fv) declines in drought stress conditions because of increased Fo and Fm reduction. In addition, combined treatments of super absorbent and bentonite with increased restrictions of water, Fv/Fm decreased and lowest value is observed in non-treated retaining moisture. Combination treatment of 0.3% bentonite and super absorbent obtained maximum photosystem photochemical II which represents a higher photosynthesis (Table 5). Results of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters showed that drought stress (60% FC) and reduction of bentonite and super absorbent levels reduced photochemical II efficiency (Fv/Fm) due to water limitation (Table 6). Proline content

Results of shoot proline content in all of bentonite, drought stress and super absorbent except super absorbent and bentonite interaction were observed significant (P<0.01) (Table 3). Shoot proline content increased by 15.62% from 100 to 60% FC. According to the results of mean comparison of the effects of drought and bentonite, the lowest proline content to the 0.3% w/w

bentonite and 100% FC (0.45), and the maximum value obtained without bentonite and 60% FC, (0.71 mg/g fresh weight) (Table 4). Combining of 0.3% w/w of bentonite and 0.3% w/w of super absorbent A 200 at 100% of field capacity reduced the proline 60.24%, compared to Control (Table 6).Combination of 0.3% w/w of bentonite and 0.3% w/w of Super Polymer with an average minimum Proline 0/39 mg per g fresh weight showed the best combination of media used to reduce injuries to drought stress (Table 5).

Phenolic compounds

Based on the results collected, it was revealed that the effects of water stress, bentonite, super absorbent and their interaction in phenolic compounds was greatly significant (Table 3) (P<0.01). Greater amounts of phenolic compounds were observed in water restriction conditions (60% FC) and (control ) so that compared to 100% FC and Combining of 0.3% w/w of bentonite and 0.3% w/w of super absorbent A 200 it was about 95/72% higher. Lowest and highest amounts of phenolic compounds, corresponds to the highest level of both super absorbent at 100% FC and control at 60% FC respectively (Table 6). The interactions of bentonite and super absorbent, difference between all beds were found in terms of phenolic compounds. Beds containing 0.3% w/w of bentonite and 0.3% w/w of superabsorbent polymer (8.98%) and the substrate with no superabsorbent (58/13%) showed the highest levels of phenols (Table 5).

Antioxidant activity

Based on the results of ANOVA table, drought stress, super absorbent and bentonite had a

significant effect on antioxidant activity (Table 3) (P<0.01). Water stress (60% FC) as well as lower levels and lacking both super absorbent increased the antioxidant activity (Table 6). 0 and 0.15 bentonite in 60% F.C stress, showed the maximum antioxidant activities (66.75 and 67.41 percent) and 0.3 bentonite in 100% F.C, was observed the lowest (26.24%) antioxidant activity recorded (Figure 1). Mean comparisons associated with increased levels of functionality superabsorbent and bentonite to decreased antioxidant activity in beds. The highest antioxidant activity (67%) was observed in control substrates (Table 5).

Total carbohydrates

Results (Table 3) showed a significant effect on all levels at (P<0.01) and only the interaction effect of drought stress and super absorbent for total carbohydrates was significant at (P<0.05). Changes of total carbohydrates are affected by stress and utilization of both artificial and natural super absorbent was significant, therefore an increase can be notified along with elevated humidity and increasing super absorbent levels (Table 6). No bentonite bed at 60% FC and beds containing 0.3% bentonite in 100% FC, showed the lowest and highest total carbohydrates respectively, (Table 4). Total carbohydrates in combination treatments of 0.3% w/w bentonite and 0.3% w/w of super absorbent polymer was maximum and 0.15% bentonite and no superabsorbent and control was the lowest among treatments and no difference significant was observed (Figure 2).

Figure 1. Interaction effects of drought stress and bentonite on Antioxidant activity

Figure 2. Interaction effects of bentonite and superabsorbent on Total carbohydrate

Table 1 : Physical and chemical characteristics of soil Permanent

Field Organic

infD..,D, Capacity Compounds EC (dS.m-1) pH K (ppm) P (ppm) N (ppm) ^ y °am (.

Point (PWP) C) (%) (%) 'iJij 'iJij Sandy loam clay

(%)

12.5

24.4 0.281

1.20

8.12 25.01 1.22 8.25 70

18

12

JOURNAL OF STRESS PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY Vol. 10 No. 1 2014

Table 3 : Mean square of drought stress, bentonite, superabsorbent levels and their interaction on Biochemical traits and Chlorophyll Index Fluorescence

Chlorophyll Index Fluorescence Biochemical traits

Source of Variance Df Fo Fm Fv Fv/Fm Total carbohydrate (mg g'1 FW1) Antioxidant activity (%) Total phenolics (mg g'1 FW1) Proline (mgg-1 FW1)

DS( Drought Stress) 1 0.1289" 1.311" 1.112" 0.250" 0.069" 9114.97" 4274.42" 0.185"

B( Bentonite) 2 0.2175" 0.235" 0.186" 0.025" 0.231” 2165.80" 5556.49" 0.132"

S(Superabsorbent) 2 0.1768" 1.208" 0.777" 0.140" 0.126" 2555.90" 4524.57" 0.331"

DS.B 2 0.0168" 0.032" 0.008" 0.019" 0.049" 1019.46" 676.28" 0.007"

DS. S 2 0.0131" 0.087" 0.001" 0.033" 0.000'" 876.28 186.29 0.005"

SB 4 0.0149" 0.072" 0.039" 0.011" 0.006" 333.71" 313.75" 0.002'

S.DS.B 4 0.0084" 0.007" 0.004" 0.008" 0.002"* 277.07" 39.72" 0.003"

Error 54 0.00019 0.00162 0.00023 0.00034 0.011 1.97 1.033 0.00094

ns, * and ** are Non-significant, significant at the 5% and 1% probability levels, respectively.

Table 4 : Means comparisons interaction of drought stress and bentonite levels on Biochemical traits and Chlorophyll Index Fluorescence

Chlorophyll Index Fluorescence

Biochemical traits

Treatment Fo Fm Fv Fv/Fm Total carbohydrate (mg g'1 FW1) Total phenolics (mg g1 FW1) Proline (mgg'1 FW1)

Drought Stress Bentonite

0 0,47a 0.86f 0,36e 0.40d 0.85c 60.39a 0.71a

60% 0,15 0.25d 0.94e 0,36e 0.37e 0.90b 31.15c 0.63b

0.30 0.28c 1.09d 0.54d 0,47c 0.91b 21.45d 0.59c

0 0.33b 1.22b 0.61c 0.49b 0.88b 32.72b 0.63b

100% 0,15 0.21e 1,15c 0.65b 0,55a 0.89b 22.17d 0,54d

0,30 0.21e 1.34a 0,75a 0,55a 1.13a 11.87e 0.45e

*ln each column means followed by similar letter not significantly different (LSD: 0.05).

0

UJ CD

1 i O NJ

cn

0 NJ

In P

1 i i

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

WWW In ipi k)

UH Un i i

QJ

rt>

sP

o\

O"

a>

3

r+

o

3

fl)

CL

sP

0s*

308 Evaluation of Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Biochemical Traits...

JOURNAL OF STRESS PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY Vol. 10 No. 1 2014

Chlorophyll Index Fluorescence Biochemical traits

Treatment Fo Fm Fv Fv/Fm Antioxidant activity (%) Total phenolics (mg g1 FW1) Proline (mg g'1 FW1)

Bentonite Superabsorbent

0 0.52a 0.84g 0 34g 0.38f 67.00a 58.13 a 0.7Sa

0 0 IS 0.37b l.lOd O.Sle 0.45e 61.75c 53.39b 0.67bc

0.30 0.31c 1.18c 0.60d O.SOd S8.37d 28.14e 0.56fg

0 0.26d 0.89f 0.3Sfg 0.38f 65.37b 44.02 c 0.70d

0.15 0 IS 0.26d 1.02e O.Sle 0.48d 57.25d 23.95f 0.57b

0,30 0 17f 1.24 b 0,66c 0.52c 43.S0e 12.01b 0.49d

0 0.36b 0.89f 0.36f 0.39f 61.75c 29.34d 0.66e

0.30 0 IS 0,21e 1.21bc 0,73b 0.60a 38.25f 11-S7g 0.51e

0.30 0-16f l.S4a OSSa 0.54b 30.73g 8.98 h 0.391

*ln each column means followed by similar letter not significantly different (LSD: 0.05).

Table 6 : Means comparisons interaction of Drought stress,bentonite and superabsorbent levels on Biochemical traits and Chlorophyll Index Fluorescence

Chlorophyll Index Fluorescence_________________________________________________Biochemical traits

Treatment Fo Fm Fv Fv/Fm Total carbohydrate (mg g1 FW1) Antioxidant activity (%) Total phenolics (mg g1 FW1) Proline (mg g'1 FW1)

Drought stress Bentonite Superabsorbent

0 0.60 a 0.71 j 0.211 0.29 h 0.81 1 71.00 a 70.34 a 0.83 a

0 0 15 0.43 b 0.91 g 0.41 i 0.44 f 0.85 hi 66.2S b 66.95 b 0.73 b

0 30 0.38 c 0.98 f 0.47 h o 4a e 0.89 gh 63.00 cd 43.87 d 0.57 de

0 0.22 Ig 0.83 h 0.23 kl 0.27 h 0.83 1 69.75 a 43.72 d 0,75 b

60% 0.15 0 15 0.31 d 0.95 fg 0.34 j 0.3Sg 0.92 efg 69.25 a 33 24 f 0.60 cd

0 30 0.21 g l.OSe O.Slg o 4a e 0.95 ef 63,25 c 16.50 j 0.S4e

0 0.36 c 0.83 h 0.2S k 0.29 h 0.83 1 66.50 b 31.10 g 0.77 b

0.30 0.15 0.27 e 1.12 d 0.65 e 0.57 b 1.01 d 62.7S cd 18.32 i 0.55 e

0.30 0.21 g 1.33 c 0.72 c 0.54 cd 1.06 c 53.50 f 14.95 k 0.46 f

0 0.43 b 0.97 fg 0.47 h o.4a e 0.82 i 63.00 cd 45.93 c 0,73 b

0 0 15 0.31 d 1.29 c 0.62 f o 4a e 0.89 fgh 57.25 e 39.83 e 0.62 c

0.30 0.241 1,39 b 0.73 c 0.52 d 0.93efg 53.75 f 12.40 1 0.55 e

0 0.30 d 0.95 fg 0.46 h 0.48 s 0.80 i 61.00 d 44.32 d 0.65 t

100% 0.15 0.15 0.20| 1.08 de 0.67 d 0.62 a 0.91 elg 4S.25 g 14.66 k 0.54 e

0.30 0.12 i 1.43 b 0.81 b 0.56 be 0.96e 23.7S h 7.53 m 0.44 f

0 0,36 c 0.96 fg 0.47 h 0.4a e 1.04 cd 57.00 e 27.59 h 0.56 de

0.30 0 15 0.16 h 1.31c 0.82 b 0.62 a 1.14 b 13.75 i 5.02 n 0.47 f

0.30 0.11 i 1.75 a 0.97 a 0.S5 bed 1.21 a 7.97 j 3.01 o 0.33 g

*ln each column means followed by similar letter not significantly different (LSD: 0.05).

o

Ghale Beig et al.

DISCUSSION

Chlorophyll fluorescence indices

One of the attributes that have been affected by drought stress is the photosystem II yield quantum. Light redundancy is characterized by reduced photosystem II performance. This event occurs in two conditions; first, when the leaves are suddenly exposed to intense light which damages photosystem II center and second when exposed to water restriction. In this case, reducing the surge in non-radiation excitation energy results in energy release as heat (Mohammad et al., 1996). Ashraf et al. (2007) also reported low photosystem II quantum yield in maize and, Mehrjerdi et al. (2012), on pea and Mamnoei and Sharifi (2010) on barley too. Similar results have additionally been reported in a variety of studies (Fardad and Shirdeli, 1996; Mohammad et al., 1996; Legg et al., 2000).

Proline content

Proline is one of the membrane and protein protectants in stress conditions. Reduction in the rate of proline oxidation led to increased proline accumulation, which plays an important role in alleviating negetive effects of drought stress (Paleg et al., 1985; Santoro et al., 1992; Kiyosue et al., 1996). Different studies showed that the accumulation of proline is associated with drought tolerance of plants (Van Rensburg et al., 1993). Biological synthesis of proline starts with glutamic acid and reduction take place in following. Electrons from NADPH and NADH is provided for this process to carboxylase D-proline acid 5 (DP5C) so that in the final stage proline is formed by turning of P5C (Pyrronline-5-carboxylic acid) and enzyme-labeled DP5C. In fact, the synthesis of proline is derived from glutamate (drought stress) and Rtynyn (salt

stress) which is due to the induction of enzyme activity (P5CS and P5CR) and inhibition of oxidizing enzymes such as PRODH and P5COH (Hare et al., 1999). Proline content increased along with drought stress severity. Proline molecules consist of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic segments. Soluble proline can affect other protein solubility and prevents abnormal albumin denaturation. This proline is characteristic is because the interaction between proline and other hydrophobic proteins are set due to the increased hydrophilic protein levels, which in turn increased the stability and prevented denaturation. Although proline content was not significantly affected by irrigation levels in German chamomile (Pirzad, 2007), but our results were in agreement with (Sanchez et al., 1998) on pea and (Zaifnejad et al., 1997) in sorghum. Proline accumulation in plants helps a brief period of drought survival and subsequent recovery therefore it will have a positive effect on yield performance. But this situation will not be true in long-term stress and proline accumulation will even have a negative effect on plant yield, because photosynthetic sources are derived to lateral functions other than seed formation (Sanchez et al., 1998).

Phenolic compounds

Plants have the ability to produce antioxidant compounds such as phenolic compounds under drought stress to protect cells against active radicals. Many phenolic compounds are known to act as antioxidants and can effectively remove hydroxyl and Proxyl radicals and prevent fat oxidation (Boscaiu et al., 2010). Changes in total phenols in pea leaves showed a significant reduction in elevated drought stress levels (Mehrjerdi et al., 2012). Phenolic compound decrease was also reported in sweet potatoes

under water stress (Lin et al., 2006). In triticale, water stress increased phenolic compound production in susceptible cultivars, but resistance cultivars change were not insignificant (Hura et al., 2007). This decrease could result from degradation of these compounds in response to oxidative stress conditions.

Antioxidant activity

Pootesmaeil et al. (2006) observed an increase in antioxidant enzymes such as catalase; superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase activity in red bean and by reaching super absorbent polymer used up to 7%, enzyme activity reduced due to drought stress alleviation. It also stated that the increased enzyme activities above mentioned represent the stress condition and their effect on reducing oxidative stress alleviation and free radical scavenging role. Sheikh (2004) in an experiment on pea stated that water stress significantly increased catalase activity and super acid dismutase. Saie et al. (2005) showed that catalase activity was significantly affected by drought stress. They considered antioxidant enzyme activity as a determinant for drought tolerance in forage sorghum. Shokravi (2004) stated that glutathione peroxidase activity in sunflower plants will significantly increase under drought stress compared to control. Drought stress increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes (Oman et al., 2005). Hence the ability of these enzymes can be used as a marker for selection of drought-tolerant varieties of sunflower nuts. Jensen et al., (1996) stated that elevated drought stress, enhanced superoxide dismutase activity after 24 hours. Beds lacking super absorbent and drought stress conditions, highest antioxidant activity were observed in the current study, which are consistent with

Pootesmaeil et al. (2006), Rahmani, (2007) and Jin et al (2006).

Total carbohydrates

Soluble sugars are among compatible osmolyts which are accumulated in stress situations and may act as osmotic protectant or osmotic guardians (Irigoyen et al., 1992). Various reports showed an increase in soluble sugars on pea (Sanchez et al., 1998) and alfalfa (Irigoyen et al., 1992), in response to drought stress. German chamomile showed no increase in soluble sugar even with the most severe levels of drought stress (Pirzad and Razban, 2011), whereas trigonella enhanced carbohydrate content in terms of water shortages (Shokhmgar et al., 2009). Carbohydrate enhancement as an osmotic regulator in drought stress (Sanchez et al., 1998) and protection of proteins against free radical oxidative damage is important. Reduction of carbohydrates in response to drought stress mentioned in some investigations has met their participation in osmoregulation with skepticism (Thakur and Rai 1980). On the other hand noticeable amounts of carbon that could have been used for plants growth are utilized for osmotic compounds (sugars) production and osmotic adjustment which led to growth decline (De Herralde et. al., 1998). No increase in soluble sugar of German chamomile, occurred even with the most severe drought (Pirzad, 2007).

REFERENCES

Abe, N., Murata, T., Hirota, A. (1998) Novel 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryhy- drazyl- radical scavengers, bisorbicillin and demethyltrichodimerol, from a fungus. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry., 62: 661-662.

Abedi-koupai, J., and Sohrab, F. (2004) Effect of Zeolite and bentonite on soil hydraulic

properties. In: Proceedings of 12th Symposium Crystallography and Mineralogy of Iran. Shahid Chamran University., 562-567.

Aeschbach, R., LoEliger, J., Scott, B.C., Murcia, A., Butler, J., Halliwell, B., Aruoma, O.I. (1994) Antioxidant action of thymol, carvacrol,6-gingerol, zingerone and hydroxytyrosol. Food Chem. Toxicol., 32: 31-36.

Arazmjo, A., Heydari, M., GHanbari, A., Ahmadian,

A. and Sadeghi, S. (2009) Effects of water stress on osmotic adjustment, photosynthetic pigments and chamomile essential oils, first national conference on environmental stresses in agricultural science. University of Birjand, Birjand., Page 155.

Ashraf, M., Nawazish, S. and Athar, H. (2007) Are chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic capacity potential physiological determinants of drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.). Pak. J. Bot., 39: 1123-1131.

Ataie sheikh, A. (2004) Effect of drought stress on physiological characteristics and activity level of the antioxidant enzymes in different varieties of peas, MS Thesis, Islamic Azad University of Karaj.

Bahramikia, S., Yazdanparast, R. (2008) Antioxidant and free radical scavering activities of different fractions of Anethum graveolens leaves using in vitro models., Pharmacol online, 2: 233-219.

Barker, D.J., Sullivan. C.Y. and Moser, L. E. (1993) Water deficit effects on osmotic potential, cell wall elasticity, and prolin in five forage grasses. Agronomy Journal., 85: 270-275.

Bates, L. S., Waldran, R.P., Teare, I.D. (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water studies. Journal of Plant and Soil., 39: 205-208.

Bhardway, R. and Singhal, G. (1981) Effect of water

stress on photochemical activity of chloroplasts during greening etiolated barley seedlings. Plant Cell Physiology., 22 (2): 155-162.

Boscaiu, M., Sanchez, M., Bautista, I., Donat, P., Lidon, A., Llinares, J., Llul, C., Mayoral O. and Vicente, O. (2010). Phenolic compounds as stress markers in plants from gypsum habitats. Bull. UASVM Hort. 67: 44-49.

Candan, F., Unlu, M., Tepe, B., Daferera, D., Polissiou, M., Sokmen, A.H., Akpulat, A. (2003) Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil and methanol extracts of Achillea millefolium subsp. Millefolium Afan. (Asteraceae) Ethnophama., 87: 215-220.

Chatchawan, C., Soottawat, B., Jakul, H., Nattiga, S. (2008) Antioxidant components and properties of five long- grained rice bran extracts from commercial available cultivars in Thailands. Food Chem., 111 (3): 636-641.

Cronic, C. and Massacci, A. (1996) Leaf photosynthesis under droghut stress. Kluwer Academic Publishing. Dordrecht-Boston-London, In: Photosynthesis and the

environment (ed. Baker, N. R.)., 347-366.

Crowe, J.H., Carpenter, J.F., Crowe, L.M. and Anchordoguy, T.J. (1990) Arefreezing and dehydration similar stress vectors A comparisonof modes of interaction of stabilizing solutes with biomolecules. Cryobiology., 27: 219-231.

De Herralde, F., Biel, C., Save, R., Morales, M.A., Torreciallas, A., Alarcon, J.J. and Sanchez-Blanco, M.J. (1998) Effect of water and stress on the growth, gas exchange and water relations in Agryanthemum coronopifolium plants. Plant Science., 139: 9-17.

Dennis, E.S., Dolferus, R., Ellis, M., Rahman, M., Wu,

Y., Hoeren, F.U., Grover, A., Ismond, K.P., Good,

A.G., Peacock W.J. (2000) Molecular strategies for improving waterlogging tolerance in plant. Journal of Experimental Botany., 51: 89-97.

Fardad, H. and Shirdeli, A. (1996) The effect of irrigation on grain yield and growth. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 26(1): 121-132.

Giardi, M.T., Cona, A., Geiken, D., Kucera, T., Masojidek, J. and Mattao, A.K. (1996) Long-term drought stress induced structural and functional reorganization of photosystem II. Planta, 199: 118-125.

Golluce, M., Sahin, F., Sokmen, M., Ozer, H., Daferera, D., Sokmen, A., Polissiou, M., Adiguzel, A., Ozken, H. (2007) Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of the essential oils and methanol extract from Mentha longifolia L. ssp. longifolia. Food Chem, 103: 1449-1456.

Hare, P.D., Cress V.A. and Staden, J.V. (1999) Proline synthesis and degredation: a model system for elucidating stress related signal transduction. Journal of Experimental Botany, 50: 413-434.

Hedge, J.E., Hofreiter, B.T. (1962) In: R. L. Whistler &

B. Miller (Ed.), Carbohydrate Chemistry. Academic Press, New York. pp.17-22.

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

Heydarisharifabadi, H. (2001) Ways to cope with drought and famine. Publications, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Tehran.

Hoekstra, F. A. and Buitink. J. (2001) Mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance. Trends in Plant Science, 8(9): 431-438.

Hura, T., Grzesiak, S. Hura, K. Thiemt, E. Tokarz, K. and Wedzony, M. (2007) Physiological and biochemical tool useful in drought-tolerance detection in genotypes of winter triticale: Accumulation of ferulic acid. Ann. Bot., 100: 767-775.

Irigoyen, J.J., Emerich, D.W. and Sanchez-Diaz, M. (1992) Water stress induced changes in concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in nodulated alfafa (Medicago sativa) plants. Physiologia Plantarum., 84: 55-60.

Jensen, C.R., Mogensen , V.O., Mortensen, G. and Fieldsend, J.K. (1996) Sees glucosinolate ,oil and protein contents of field-grown rape (Brassica napus L.) affected by soil drying and evaporative demand. Field Crops Res., 47: 93-105.

Jin, J., Ningwei, S.H. Jinhe, B. and Junping, G. (2006) Regulation of ascorbate peroxidase at the transcript level is involved in tolerance to post harvest water deficit stress in the cut Rose (Rosa hybrida L.) CV. Samantha. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 40(3): 236-243.

Kabiri, K. (2005) Superabsorbent Hydrogel: Introduction and Applications. In: Proceedings of 3rd specific symposium on application of super absorbent polymer hydro gels in agriculture. Petrochemistry and Polymer Research Center Iran. Karaj.

Kafi, M., Borzoee, A., Salehi, M., Kamandi, A., Masoumi, A. and Nabati, J. (2009) Physiology of Environmental Stress in Plants. Jahad, Mashhad University Press.

Karpinska, M., Borowski, J., Danowska- Oziewicz, M. (2001) The use of natural antioxidants in ready-to- serve food. Food Chem., 72: 5-9.

Katalinic, V., MIlos, M., Kulisic, T., Jukic, M. (2006) Sceerning of 70 medical plant extracts for antioxidant capacity and total phenols. Food Chem., 94: 550-577.

Kiyosue, T., Yoshiba, Y., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. and Shinozaki, K. (1996) Nuclear gene, encoding mitochondrial proline but downregulated by dehydration in Arabidobsis. Plant Cell, 8: 1323-

1335.

Koochaki, A. and Alizadeh, A. (1986) Principles of Agronomy In dry areas. Razavi Publications., 270 p.

Legg, B.J., Day, W.D., Lawlor, W. and Parkinson, K.J. (2000) The effects of drought on barley growth: models and measurements showing the relative importance of leaf area and photosynthetic rate. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 92: 703-716.

Leinhose, V. and Bergman, H. (1995) Changes in the yield lignin content and protein pattern of barley induced by drought stress. Angewandte-Batanik, 69: 206-210.

Lin, K.H., Chao, P.Y., Yang, C.M., Cheng, W.C., Lo, H.F. and Chang, T.R. (2006) The effects of flooding and drought stresses on the antioxidant constituents in sweet potato leaves. Bot. Stud., 47: 417-426.

Ma, B.L., Morison, M.J. and Videng, H.D. (1995) Leaf greenness and photosynthetic rates in soybean. Crop Science, 35: 1411-1414.

Mamnoei, A., and Sharifi, S. (2010) Effects of water stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and yield of proline (Canopy) six barley genotypes and its relationship with marquee temperature. Plant biology, 5: 51-62.

McDonald, S., Prenzler, P.D., Autolovich, M., Robards, K. (2001) Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of olive extracts. Food Chemistry, 73: 73-84.

Mehrjerdi, M., Bagheri, A., Bahrami, A., Nabati, A. and Masoomi, A. (2012) Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics, phenolic compounds changed and capacity-inhibition radicals active in hydroponic culture (Cicer arietinum L.) different genotypes chickpeas.

Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture, 3(1): 67-80.

Mohammad, J., Naziri, M., Nazir, A., Shah, D. and Jamal, H. (1996) Wheat yield component as affected by low water stress at different growth stage. Sarhad Journal Agriculture, 12: 19-26.

Moffatt, J., Sears, M.R. G. and Paulsen, G. (1990) Wheat height temperature tolerance during reproductive growth. I: Evaluation by

chlorophyll fluorescence. Crop Science, 881885.

Muret, K., Sevgi, K., Sengul, K., Esra, U., Cemalettin,

B., Fedra, V. (2007) Biological activities, chemical composition of three honeys of different types from Anatolia. Food Chem., 100(2): 526-534.

Oman, A., Habibi, M., Mashhadiakbarboojar, M. and Khodabandeh, N. (2005) Antioxidant enzymes as a marker to select different sunflower genotypes for drought tolerance. Iranian Journal of Agronomy, 2(5): 17-29.

Paleg, L.G., Stewart, R. C. and Starr, R. (1985) The effects of compatible solutes on proteins. Plants and Soil, 89: 83-94.

Pirzad, A. (2007) Effects of irrigation and plant density on some physiological characteristics of ingredients and German chamomile. PhD thesis, Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Faculty.University of Tehran.

Pirzad, A. and Razban, M. (2011) Effect of different rates of superabsorbent under different irrigation regimes on growth and (Matricaria chamomilla), German chamomile tolerance to water deficit in the second culture. Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Production, 21(4): 123137.

Pootesmaeil, P., Habibi, D. and

Mashhadiakbarboojar, M. (2006) Super Absorbent Polymer on the use of performance enhancing antioxidant enzyme activity in different cultivars Red bean under drought stress, Master's thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University of Karaj.

Rahmani, N. (2007) Effect of irrigation and nitrogen application time on qualitative and quantitative characteristics of evergreen plants, Master's thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University.

Ritchie, S.W., H.T. Nguyen and A.S. Halody. (1990) Leaf water content and gas exchange parameters of two wheat genotypes difefering in drought resistance. Crop Sciences. 30: 105111.

Saie, M., Habibi, D., Mashhadiakbarboojar, M., Mahmoodi, A. and Ardakani, M.R. (2005) Antioxidant enzyme levels as a parameter of type forage sorghum, a drought-resistant, Abstracts for the First International Conference of Biological Sciences, Iran.

Sanchez, J., Manzanares, M., de Andres, E.F., Tenorio, J.L. and Ayerbe, L. (1998) A turgor maintenance, osmotic adjustment and soluble sugar and proline accumulation in 49 pea cultivars in response to water stress. Field Crops Res., 59: 225-235.

Santoro, M.M., Liu, Y., Khan, S.M.A., Hou, L.X. and Bolen, D.W. (1992) Increased thermal stability of proteins in the presence of naturally occurring osmolytes. Biochemistry, 31: 52785283.

Senji, S., Yuuya, I. (2008) Comparison of antioxidant properties of persimmon vinegar and some other commercial vinegar in radical-scavenging assays and on lipid oxidation in tuna

homogenates. Food Chem., 107(2): 739-744.

Shokhmgar, M., Baradaran, R., Moosavi, S., Pooyan, M., Beagi, S. and Arazmjoo, A. (2009) Irrigation effects on proline compounds, carbohydrates, chlorophyll and nutrient uptake in fenugreek. Page 235, first national conference on environmental stresses in agricultural science. University of Birjand, Birjand. Stejskal M. 1996. Mining and treatment of silicate (in Czech). Silikatavy svaz, Praha., 443 p.

Shokravi, M. (2004) Effects of water stress on yield and yield components of sunflower nuts, Master's thesis, Islamic Azad University.

Theriault, M., Caillet, S., Kermash, S., Lacroix, M. (2006) Antioxidant, antiradical and at mutagenic activity of phenolic compounds present in maple products. Food Chem., 98: 490-501.

Thakur, P.S., and Rai, V.K. (1980) Water stress effects on maize: Carbohydrate metabolism of resistant and susceptible cultivars of Zea mays L. Biologia Plantarum, 21(1): 50-56.

Van Rensburg, L., Kruger, C.H. and Kruger, H. (1993) Proline accumulation as drought tolerance selection criterion: its relationship to member integrity and chloroplast ultrastructure in Nicotiana tobacum L. Journal of Plant Physiology, 141: 188-194.

Yadegarinia, D., Gachkar, L., Rezaei, M.B., Taghizadeh, M., Astaneh. S.A., Rasooli, I. (2006) Biochemical activities of Iranian Mentha piperita L. and Myrtus communis L. essential oils. Phytochem., 67: 1249-1255.

Zaifnejad, M., Clarck, R.B. and Sullivan, C.Y. (1997) Aliminum and water stress effects on growth and proline of sorghum. Journal of Plant Physiology, 150: 338-244.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.