_«ТРАНСПОРТЫ! СИСТЕМИ ТА ТЕХНОЛОГИ ПЕРЕВЕЗЕНЬ»_
36ipHUK наукових праць ДНУЗТ iM. акад. В. Лазаряна. Вип. 12. 2016р.
UDK 656.2
D. M. KOZACHENKO1*, I. L. ZHURAVEL2*, V. V. ZHURAVEL3*
1 Research Department, Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Lazaryan St., 2, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010, tel. +38 (056) 373 15 04, e-mail [email protected],
ORCID 0000-0003-2611-1350
2 Dep. «Management of Operational Work», Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Lazaryan St., 2, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010, tel. +38 (056) 373 15 70, e-mail [email protected],
ORCID 0000-0002-4405-6386
3 Dep. «Stations and junctions», Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Lazaryan St., 2, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010, tel. +38 (056) 373 15 12, e-mail [email protected], ORCID 0000-0001-7338-4584
ESPECIALLY THE FUNCTIONING OF RAILWAY STATIONS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE ORGANIZATION OF TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS
Purpose. Ensuring a sufficient level of transport safety is an important task in the context of development of railway transport as a part of international transport corridors and under increasing freight traffic volumes. The intensification of the transport process when there is the significant depreciation of fixed assets actualizes the development and implementation of methods to of improving the safety of railway transportation of dangerous goods, as well as technological and organizational measures, which are directed decrease of risks of emergency situations with its goods. Methodology. The methods of system analysis and theory of the railways operating management were used. Findings. The regulatory framework of the dangerous goods transportation by rail was characterized. The main indicators of the dangerous goods transportation under modern conditions of railway transport functioning were investigated. A detailed structure of the factors, which influence on the stations operating conditions during the transportation of dangerous goods was developed, and the measures of the stations technology improving in order to increase the traffic safety were proposed. Originality. Authors had detailed features of the functioning of the railway stations functioning under the dangerous goods transportation management. Practical value. Taking into account the factors and implementation of the proposed measures will improve the safety level of dangerous goods processing at railway stations.
Keywords: dangerous goods; railway stations; transport safety; preventive actions.
Introduction
In the context of the Strategic Plan of development of railway transport of Ukraine until 2020 [1], it is an important task of international rail freight corridors development since transportation volume and distance increasing rise the part of railways in the transport market [2]. In such a case, it is important to provide the sufficient safety level of transportation first of all of dangerous goods (DG).
The part of dangerous goods is sensate enough in general railing (according to the different valuation it is from 18 % till 25 % [3-5]), but at some station of railway network their part in processing freight flow reaches 50 % [6].
Applicability of exploitation and implementation of methods promotion of safety railing of dangerous goods, and technological and organization arrangement for reduction dangers of extremal situation with dangerous goods. It's proclaims intensification of railing in difficult conditional, for example tear rail stock and reforming of sector [5]. Total safety will attain practically impossible, be-
cause a lot of mistakes do people and railway hasn't good characteristic of reliability of hardware and software. In this work did classification of measurements of safe railway operation, when railway was removing dangerous goods and developed charts of risk calculation and damage from railway passage, in and for governorship and independent itineraries of railway.
The robust model of evolution during forwarding of DG and methods of adjectives of danger was offered at work [7]. Herewith, assay of risk can be pointed as process of identifying of dangers and mark of risk for: people who assist and someone, who doesn't take part in technological process; transport capacity items; buildings; environment and other objects.
Forecasting of risks was applying at work [8] for valuation itineraries of railway of DG by railway and by car and eventual wake of military's part.
The exist regulatory structure railing of DG by railway pass on distinct location, about classification of DG, their identification, package, coding,
© Kozachenko D. M., Zhuravel I. L., Zhuravel V. V. 2016
receiving and receiving etc. Herewith, despite sufficient world experience of applying the methodology acceptable level of risk for hazardous effects [5], thanks to which man-made risks in the developed world in 10...15 years was reduced by two orders of magnitude, in the regulatory framework at DG carriage Railways of Ukraine, its recommendations didn't take into account.
Purpose
The purpose of this article is particularization of factors that impact on the work stations during the transport of dangerous goods, and the development of proposals for improving the operation of the stations of the railway network with the purpose of improving transportation safety.
Methodology
The importance of developing measures to improve the security of transportation DG is due to an increase in their share in the total volume of transportation of goods by Railways system. In particular, according to the statistics of the Directorate D of rail transportation regional branch P of UZ with a total size of departure DG (about 14 % in 2015, it was compared to 2014) growth scope in shipment of flammable gases (LNR - class 2 division 2.1) exports amounted to 36 %, the arrival in the internal notification of flammable liquids (class 3) rose by 18 %, the general sending on of toxic substances (class 6.1) increased by 20 %, and arrival of imported corrosive substances (class 8) increased by 38 %. A significant increase in departure and arrival is typical for other DG (class 9): although total shipment increased slightly, the total arrival increased by 22 %, increase in arrival in the internal message amounted to 24 %, sending exports up by 10 % and arrival in imports amounted to 12 %. The structure of the DG traffic volume by hazard class for the Directorate in 2015 slightly changed compared to 2014 and is shown in fig 1. Thus, the nomenclature of the DG come and go, is quite varied (a list of the main LC are given in table 1) and depends on the specialization of the enterprises serviced by the stations of Directorate D.
Rulemaking of transport conditions of DG and, accordingly, the regulatory framework that applies in this case depends on the type of the traffic.
Table 1
The nomenclature of basic DG that processing on the stations of railway bureau DND
Fig. 1. The structure of the volume transport of dangerous goods by D
Class of
dangero us The main hazard Name DG Subsidiary hazard № EK
goods
gases propane, butane 206
flammable methyl chloride 209
gases oxidizing chlorine corrosive 203
2 ammonia anhydrous corrosive 208
gases nitrogen, refrigerated liquid 201
flammable non-toxic ammonia 208
oxygen, refrigerated liquid oxidizing 202
methanol toxic 319
motor spirit 305
benzene 314
3 flammable diesel fuel 315
liquid coal tar distillates, flammable — 305
paint, lacquer 305, 328
4.1 flammable matches, safety 402
solid sulphur 404
substance seed cake 405
liable to
4.2 spontaneous combustion sodium sulphide (< 30 %) 406
calcium nitrate,
oxidizing substance ammonium nitrate 501,
5.1 based fertilizer, — 509,
fertilizers ammonium 505
sodium hydroxide solution
hydrochloride acid 801
sulphuric acid
liquid rechargeable
corrosive substance nitric acid other than red fuming oxidizing 802
8 quicklime
sodium sulphide (> 30 %) 808
ammonium water 809
caustic soda —
aluminum sulfate 816
chlorophenolates 823
Batteries 834, 835
9 miscellaneous dangerous substance and articles environ-mentally hazardous substance (coal tar, mineral fertilizers, solid coal-tar pitch, acetonanil, mazut, etc) — 901... 906
Conditions of carriage of DG in domestic traffic by rail of Ukraine are defined by Rules of transportations of dangerous goods [9], which determine the peculiarities of cargo transportation, which are assigned to one of the classes of danger. Specific conditions of carriage of the individual DG determine the need for application of the relevant transport regulations. In particular, DG the carriage in bulk is regulated except for [9] Rules of transportations of liquid loads [10].
In the case of DG transportation in interstate transportation (CIS countries and Georgia) the Rules of transportation of dangerous goods for Railways [11], and in the case of carriage in bulk also govern the transport of liquid cargo [12].
International carriage of DG in the countries participating in the agreement on international goods transport by rail (SMGS) is regulated by Annex 2 to SMGS [13], and between countries-participants of the Convention concerning international carriage by rail (COTIF) used rules for international railway transport of dangerous goods (RID) [14]. The basis for all international rules and regulations recommendations of the UN Committee of experts [15].
In the case of an emergency on the railway transport of Ukraine, the liquidation procedure is determined by the current edition of the rules of safety and order of liquidation of consequences of emergency situations (ES) [16]. In addition, in [16], emergency card (EK) for each DG, which should be performed on rail transport.
Originality and practical value
The main factors that affect the conditions of work stations during the transport of dangerous goods are as follows:
- the size of the arrival, departure and transit of DG;
- main and additional dangers DG;
- conditions of carriage DG (packages, bulk etc.);
- view and ownership of rolling stock;
- kind of message, which is DG transportation
etc.
To the peculiarities of operation of railway stations when transportation DG include of:
- need comply standards of ensure cover wagon with a separate DG in the cases of locomotives and coaches with passengers in the train or shunting part of train [9, 11, 13, 17, 18]. Marks of standards of ensure cover wagon with a separate DG were made in column 60 is put in the electronic invoice internal traffic at DG [19] and transferred under the wagon sheet;
- need comply standards of the requirements regarding the limitation or prohibition of the dissolution of the wagons with a separate DG in the cases with hump yards or denying execution of the corresponding shunting, shocks [9, 11, 13, 17, 18]. Marks of standards of the provisions limitations dissolution with slides is put in the column 62 of the electronic consignment note internal messages at DG [19]and transferred under the wagon sheet. During the simulation work station with slide possible to use block simulation of the presence in the composition of the wagons which is forbidden to dissolution the hump yards, with the purpose of more accurate regulation of the length of the corresponding shunting work [20];
- complying with the requirements for maintenance of DG conductors senders (recipients) or security specialists of the sender [9, 11, 13, 21]. Marks of conveying by conductors of the sender (recipient) is placed in column 7 of the «Declarations of sender» sender invoice internal communications at DG [19];
- compliance with the requirements for protection by means of the militarized guard of railways for DG , which are included in the nomenclature list of goods [9, 11, 22]. Marked on the conservation of DG by militarized guard railway in the electronic consignment note internal traffic affixed stamp «Guard of railway»;
- compliance with the requirements [ 9-14] regarding the admission to transportation of cars in technical and commercial regard. In particular, in the electronic consignment note internal messaging is required a mark in the 7 «Declarations of sender» on the compliance of own (rented) rolling stock to render requirements indicating the number of the certificate on the technical condition [9, 19]. Is required under the labeling on containers and packaging of the DG and on the rolling stock, which is transported DG [9, 11, 13-15];
- the need for full compliance with the requirements of [9] concerning correctness of filling of the column 20 «Name of goods», in particular the presence of a mark on the insurance the sender of his liability in case of occurrence negative consequences during transportation DG [9, 19], etc.
Requirements [17, 18] should be taken into account during the formation of trains, which include wagons from DG. In particular, these wagon never put passenger and postal-luggage trains, in the human trains (including the empty tanks from-under liquefied gases), in cargo or passenger trains (with the exception, as an exception, except DG class 1 on moderately loaded areas, with the approval and in the manner determined by the head of the regional branch.
In addition, in the technologic process of each station must be defined way for passing, receiving and sending, as well as lay-over (if necessary) outside of train cars DG class 1 and tank-wagons with marked gases [17]. Requirements [17] also identified the need for sorting and precinct stations local instructions for the implementation of shunting and formation of trains with wagons loaded DG class 1.
For marshalling yards by requirements [13] provides for the drawing up of internal plans to ensure safety in the event of an emergency during transport of DG to prevent or reduce harmful effects on human health and the environment.
Thus, peculiarities of functioning of railway stations are significant in terms of transportation DG, and their implementation is mandatory for the railway employees to prevent the occurrence of alternating current.
Findings
Statistics proves that in the case of preventive measures, warnings as with DG [23] the costs associated with this (i.e., with a warning of risk), much less expenses on liquidation of consequences of ES [24].
Analysis accepted for accounting purposes as at the regional branch of P UZ showed that from 2009 to 2014, the number was reduced from 12 to 2. The main reasons as the following:
- The vast majority is the moisture creep age of DG, class 3 (petroleum products) and 8 (acid);
- Of spontaneous combustion during transport of sulphur (class 4.1 of DG) under the protective cover in open wagons under special conditions.
To prevent the occurrence of as with DG during rail transport [23] the necessary condition is fully taken into account peculiarities of operation of railway stations and the implementation of the requirements of the current normative database [9...14]. The true definition of hazardous properties of HB and the choice of transport conditions, the right choice of packaging, containers and rolling stock, compliance of the technical condition of rolling stock, forming of trains and shunting of trains performing shunting with wagons with DG, accompanied by guides or security, fill in transportation documents in accordance with the requirements the insurance entities of transport DG of its responsibility in case of occurrence of negative effects and other defined normative documents requirements will certainly enhance the level of security of the DG in the whole of the transport chain.
The measures proposed to be implemented at
railway stations in terms of transportation DG include:
- Compliance with the requirements of traffic safety, in particular the basic principles of the current railway transport management system traffic safety (consistency, pre-emption, prevention, prevention, rapid response, investigation, etc.);
- Qualification and special training of the personnel associated with the transport of DG;
- Compliance with the normal working conditions of the staff of the railway station;
- The right conditions, traffic, rolling stock, containers and packaging subject to the hazardous properties of the extreme situation their classification and identification;
- Ensure proper technical state of rolling stock for transportation of DG, including the preparation of wagons and containers in the cases provided for in relation to fire;
- Ensuring the selection of wagons and containers for carriage in DG commercially;
- Compliance by the originator of the true requirements for informing the carrier of the dangerous properties of the DG, including the level of the invoice regarding the terms and conditions of the cover, with the dissolution of hump yards, maintenance, or protection insurance the recipient of its responsibility and correct the entry in the column « Name of goods»;
- Compliance with the requirements for the marking of packaging's, containers and rolling stock from DG;
- Rational interaction of the railway station with the adjoining access roads in compliance with the regulatory framework and to prevent the emergence of the ЕS;
- Compliance in the formation of trains and shunting work with the cars from DG;
- Adherence to the principles of environmental risk management of the occurrence as during transport DG [24], in particular the detection and forecasting of hazardous processes, their intensity and recurrence, the prediction of secondary hazards in the case of the crash situation the establishment of acceptable risk etc.;
- Compliance with the requirements for safe oncoming passenger trains and trains, which include cars with DG (especially classes 1...3), especially in potentially dangerous places (e.g. near gas) [25];
- Improving the organization and management of transportation DG on the network by means of intelligent support for planning at the tactical level, which provides a reduction of possible risks [26], etc.
Conclusions
1. Modern conditions of functioning of railway stations are characterized by the intensification of the transport process and a significant depreciation of fixed assets. In this case, pressing is to improve transportation safety, and, primarily, dangerous goods, that is, reducing risks of emergency situations with them.
2. With a slight decrease in the total volume of cargo transportation by rail transport of Ukraine at separate dangerous cargoes marked the increase of traffic volumes by types of messages.
3. Detailed features of functioning of railway stations in terms of the transport of dangerous goods.
4. Suggest list of activities that will enhance the security of transport of dangerous goods by rail and processing them at railway stations network and to reduce the risk of accidents.
LIST OF REFERENCE LINKS
1. Стратепчний план розвитку залiзничного транспорту на перюд до 2020 року [Електронний ресурс] : Затв.: Наказ Мшютерства шфраструктури Украши вщ 21.12.2015 р. № 547. - Режим доступу: http://mtu.gov.ua/content/zadachi-ministerstva-v-ramkah-galuzi.html. - Загл. с экрана.
2. Миколенко, Т. Прогнози розвитку европейсь-кого ринку вантажних перевезень: за матерiалами консалтингово1 компани McKinsey / Т. Миколенко // Украшсьш залiзницi. - 2016. - № 8 (38). - С. 16-19.
3. Тесленко, И. О. Опасные грузы условия переработки которых на сортировочных горках могут быть пересмотрены [Электронный ресурс] / И. О. Тесленко, М. В. Корнеев // Технические науки - от теории к практике: сборник статей XXXVIII Межд. науч.-практ. конф. (Россия, Новосибирск, 27.11.2013 г.) - Режим доступа: https://sibac.info/conf /tech/xxviii/35138. - Загл. с экрана.
4. Очкалова, А. Р. Особенности и современные проблемы перевозок опасных грузов в России / А. Р. Очкалова // Вестник университета. - 2016. -№ 3. -С. 92-96.
5. Мартынюк, И. В. Повышение безопасности железнодорожных перевозок опасных грузов с учетом взаимодействия с другими видами транспорта и окружающей средой: дис. ... канд. техн. наук: 05.22.01 / Мартынюк Игорь Владимирович. - Ростов-на-Дону, 2007. - 158 с.
6. Журавель, I. Л. Шдвищення ефективносл ро-боти вантажних станцш за рахунок удосконалення 1х колшного розвитку : дис. ... канд. техн. наук: 05.22.20 / Журавель 1рина Леонщвна. - Дшпропет-ровськ, 2015. - 257 с.
7. Баранов, Ю. Н. Анализ и оценка риска при перевозке опасных грузов автотранспортом в АПК [Электронный ресурс]. - Режим доступа: http://cyberleninka/article/n/analiz-i-otsenka-riska-pri-
perevozke-opasnyh-gruzov-avtomobilnym-transportom-v-apk. - Загл. с экрана.
8. Srdan, Z. Rutic Procena uticaja udesa izazvanih opasnim materijama na kasarnu «Car Lazar» u Krusevcu [Електронний ресурс] / Srdan Z. Rutic, Dejan R. Indic // Vojnotehnicki glasnik / Military Technical Courier" (www.vtg.mod.gov.rs). - Р. 213235.
9. Правила перевезень небезпечних вантаж1в [Електронний ресурс] : Затв.: Наказ Мшютерства транспорту Украши 09.12.2002 р. № 873, i зареест-роваш Мшютерством юстицп Украши 29.12.2002 р. за № 1030/7318. - Режим доступу: http://uz.gov.Ua/cargo_transportation/legal_documents/t erms_of_freight/page-2/264636. - Загол. с екрану.
10. Правила перевезень наливних вантаж1в [Електронний ресурс] : Затв.: Наказ Мшютерства транспорту Украши № 299 ввд 18. 04.2003 р., i зареестро-ваш Мшютерством юстицп Украши 07.07.2003 р. за № 558/7879. - Режим доступу: http://uz.gov.ua/cargo_transportation/legal_documents/t erms_of_freight/page-2/394942/. - Загол. с екрану.
11. Правила перевозок опасных грузов по железным дорогам. [Электронный ресурс] : Утв. на 15 заседании Совета по ж. д. тр-ту 05.04.1996 г. (с изм. на 11.12.2014 р.) - Режим доступа: http://uz.gov.ua/cargo_transportation/legal_documents/ materialy_rady/. - Загл. с экрана.
12. Правила перевозок жидких грузов наливом в вагонах-цистернах и вагонах бункерного типа для перевозки нефтебитума [Электронный ресурс] : Утв. Советом по ж. д. тр-ту 21-22.05.2009 г., прот. № 50 (с изм. и дополнениями на 01.01.2015 р.) - Режим доступа: http://uz.gov.ua/cargo_transportation/legal_ documents/materialy_rady/. - Загл. с экрана.
13. Приложение 2 к СМГС. Правила перевозок опасных грузов [Электронный ресурс] : с изм. и до-полн. на 01.07.2015 г. - Режим доступа: http://uz.gov.ua/cargo_transportation/smgs. - Загл. с экрана.
14. Регламент о международной железнодорожной перевозке опасных грузов (РИД): Приложение С к Конвенции о международных железнодорожных перевозках (КОТИФ) [Электронный ресурс] : с изменениями и дополнениями на 01.07.2015 г. - Режим доступа: www.uz.gov.ua/cargo_transportation /tsim_smgs. - Загл. с экрана.
15. Рекомендации по перевозке опасных грузов. Типовые правила (ST/SG/AC.10/1/Rev.19). [Электронный ресурс] - Режим доступа: http://www/unece.org/trans/danger/danger.html. - Загл. с экрана.
16. Змши до Правил безпеки та порядку лшввда-ци наслщшв аваршних ситуацш [Електронний ресурс] : Затв. : Наказ Мшютерства транспорту та зв'язку Украши вщ 25.11.2008 за № 1431 i зареест-роваш Мшютерством юстицп Украши 26.02.2009 за № 182/16198. (з1 змшами та доповненнями станом на 01.07.2015 р.). - К., 2009. - Режим доступа: http://uz.gov.ua/cargo_transportation/legal_documents/t erms_of_freight/page-3/394950/. - Загол. с екрану.
17. Правила техшчно! експлуатаци залiзниць Укра!ни : Затв.: Наказ Мшютерства транспорту Укра!ни ввд 20.12.1996 р. № 41, i зареeстрованi Мь нiстерством юстицп Укра!ни 25.02.1997 р. за № 50/184 ф змшами) - Ки!в : Транспорт Укра!ни, 2002. - 140 с.
18. 1нструкщя з руху по1здв i маневрово! роботи на залiзницях Укра!ни (ЦД-0058) : Затв.: Наказ Мь нiстерства транспорту та зв'язку Укра!ни 31.08.2005 р. № 507 зi змiнами, затв. : Наказ Мшютерства транспорту та зв'язку Укра!ни ввд 11.08.2010 р. № 584 -Ки!в: Транспорт Укра!ни, 2005. - 462 с.
19. Правила оформлення перевiзних документiв [Електронний ресурс] : Затв.: Наказ Мшютерства транспорту Укра!ни 21.11. 2000 р. № 644 зi змiнами в редакцп наказу Мiнiстерства iнфраструктури Укра!ни вщ 08.06.2011 р № 138., i зареeстрованi Мь нiстерством юстицп Укра!ни 24.11.2000 р. за № 863/5084,. - Режим доступу: http://uz.gov.ua /cargo_transportation/legal_documents/terms_of_freight /327435/. - Загол. с екрану.
20. Журавель, В. В. Удосконалення методiв ощ-нки прицiльного регулювання на сортувальних пр-ках з метою тдвищення ефективностi !х функцюну-вання: дис. ... канд. техн. наук: 05.22.20 / Журавель Вячеслав Вжторович. - Дшпропетровськ, 2013. -239 с.
21. Правила перевезення вантажiв у супроводi проввднишв вiдправникiв (одержувачiв) [Електронний ресурс] : Затв. Наказ Мшютерства транспорту Укра!ни 21.11. 2000 р. № 644, i зареестроваш Мшю-терством Укра!ни 24.11. 2000 р. за № 868/5089, iз змшами i доповненнями. - Режим доступу: http://uz.gov.Ua/cargo_transportation/legal_documents/t erms_of_freight/264795/. - Загол. с екрану.
22. Про охорону i супроводження вантажiв залi-зничним транспортом [Електронний ресурс] : Затв. Наказ Мiнiстерства транспорту Укра!ни 20.01.1997р. № 18, зареестр. : Мiнiстерствi юстицп Укра!ни 20.02.1997 р. № 36/1840, iз змiнами i доповненнями.
- Режим доступу: http://uz.gov.ua/cargo_transportation /legal_documents/terms_of_freight/page-2/320686/. -Загол. с екрану.
23. Переста, Г. I. Роль профшактичних заходiв шд час перевезення небезпечних вантажв / Г. I. Переста, I. Л. Журавель, В. В. Журавель, С. I. Музикша // Еколопчна безпека вантажопотошв на тдприемс-твах транспортно! галузi : тези 3-! наук.-практ. конф. (25.10 - 26.10.2011 р.). - Ки!в, 2011. - С. 75-76.
24. Трепак, С. Ю. Принципи управлшня еколоп-чними ризиками виникнення аварiйних ситуацiй на залiзницi при перевезенш небезпечних вантаж1в / С. Ю. Трепак, Ю. В. Зеленько // Збiрник наукових праць Донецького шституту залiзничного транспорту. - 2014. - Вип. 37. - С. 33-37.
25. Долгополов, П. В. Шляхи тдвищення безпе-ки перевезень небезпечних вантаж1в зал1зничним транспортом / П. В. Долгополов, Д. С. Козодой // Зб. наук. пр. УкрДАЗТ. - 2014. - Вип. 144. - С. 40-46.
26. Бутько, Т. В. Удосконалення управлшня процесом просування вагошв з небезпечними ван-тажами на зал1зничнш мережi / Т. В. Бутько, Т. М. Савчук // Зб. наук. пр. УкрДАЗТ. - 2014. - Вип. 145.
- С. 95-99.
Стаття рекомендована до публ1кацИ' д.т.н., проф. Огарем О. М. (Украгна).
Надшшла до редколеги 05.11.2016.
Прийнята до друку 07.11.2016.
Д. Н. КОЗАЧЕНКО, И. Л. ЖУРАВЕЛЬ, В. В. ЖУРАВЕЛЬ
ОСОБЕННОСТИ ФУНКЦИОНИРОВАНИЯ ЖЕЛЕЗНОДОРОЖНЫХ СТАНЦИЙ В УСЛОВИЯХ ОРГАНИЗАЦИИ ПЕРЕВОЗОК ОПАСНЫХ ГРУЗОВ
Цель. В условиях развития железнодорожного транспорта в рамках международных транспортных коридоров и увеличения объемов грузовых перевозок важной задачей является вопрос обеспечения достаточного уровня безопасности. Интенсификация перевозочного процесса при значительной изношенности основных фондов актуализирует разработку и внедрение методов повышения безопасности железнодорожных перевозок опасных грузов, а также технологических и организационных мероприятий, направленных на снижение рисков возникновения аварийных ситуаций с ними. Методика. Использованы методы анализа и теории организации эксплуатационной работы железных дорог. Результаты. Охарактеризована нормативная база организации перевозок опасных грузов по железным дорогам. Исследованы основные показатели перевозки опасных грузов в современных условиях функционирования железнодорожного транспорта. Разработана детализированная структура факторов, влияющих на условия работы станций при перевозке опасных грузов, и предложены мероприятия по усовершенствованию технологии работы станций сети железных дорог с целью повышения уровня безопасности перевозок. Научная новизна. Авторами детализированы особенности функционирования железнодорожных станций при организации перевозок опасных грузов. Практическая значимость. Учет указаных факторов и внедрение предложенных мероприятий позволит повысить уровень безопасности переработки опасных грузов на железнодорожных станциях.
Ключевые слова: опасные грузы; железнодорожные станции; безопасность перевозки; профилактические мероприятия.
Д. М. КОЗАЧЕНКО, I. Л. ЖУРАВЕЛЬ, В. В. ЖУРАВЕЛЬ
ОСОБЛИВОСТ1 ФУНКЦ1ОНУВАННЯ ЗАЛ1ЗНИЧНИХ СТАНЦ1Й В УМОВАХ ОРГАНВАЦП ПЕРЕВЕЗЕНЬ НЕБЕЗПЕЧНИХ ВАНТАЖ1В
Мета. В умовах розвитку залiзничного транспорту в межах м1жнародних транспортних коридорiв i збь льшення обсягiв вантажних перевезень важливою задачею е питання забезпечення достатнього рiвня безпе-ки. 1нтенсифжащя перевiзного процесу при значному зношенш основних фондiв актуалiзуе розробку та впровадження методiв пiдвищення безпеки залiзничних перевезень небезпечних вантаж1в, а також техноло-гiчних i органiзацiйних заходiв, спрямованих на зниження ризик1в виникнення аварiйних ситуацiй з ними. Методика. Використано методи аналiзу та теорп органiзацiï експлуатацiйноï роботи залiзниць. Результати. Охарактеризовано нормативну базу органiзацiï перевезень небезпечних вантажв залiзницями. Дослiджено основш показники перевезення небезпечних вантаж1в в сучасних умовах функцюнування залiзничного транспорту. Розроблено деталiзовану структуру факторiв, як1 впливають на умови роботи станцш пiд час перевезень небезпечних вантаж1в, i запропоновано заходи щодо вдосконалення технологiï роботи станцш мереж1 залiзниць з метою тдвищення рiвня безпеки перевезень. Наукова новизна. Авторами деталiзовано особли-востi функцюнування залiзничних станцiй пiд час оргашзацп перевезень небезпечних вантаж1в. Практична значимкть. Врахування вказаних факторiв i впровадження запропонованих заходiв дозволить пiдвищити рiвень безпеки переробки небезпечних вантаж1в на залiзничних станцiях.
Ключовi слова: небезпечш вантаж1; залiзничнi станцiï; безпека перевезення; профшактичш заходи.