CC BY
1130 East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 //Avtoref.diss.kand.med.nauk. Ekaterinburg. 2007. 20. (in Russ).]
3. Хадарцева М.П. Влияние внутрижелудочного и подкожного введения сульфата кадмия на электролито-водовыделительную функцию почек при экспериментальном гипервитаминозе Д //Медицинский вестник Северного Кавказа. 2011. №3 (23). С.64-67. [ Hadarceva M.P. Vlijanie vnutrizheludochnogo i podkozhnogo vvedenija sul'fata kadmija na jelektrolito-vodovydelitel'nuju funkciju pochek pri jeksperimental'nom gipervitaminoze D //Medicinskij vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza. 2011. (3). 64-67 (in Russ).]
4. Masato O., Atsushi. M., Mitsuya S. Heavy metal chelator TPEN attenuates fura-2 fluorescence changes induced by cadmium, mercury and methylmercury //The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science Advance Publication. 15 Jan. 2016.
5. Nam H.K., Young Y.H, L. Kyu-Beck., et all. Environtmetal Heavy Metal Exposure and Chronic Kidney Disease in the General population // Yournal of Korean Medical Science. 2015. (3). 272-277.
6. Young J.S., Ji E.L., Dae H.L., et all. Prevalence and Relationship of Iron Deficiency Anemia with Blood Cadmium and Vitamin D Levels in Korean Women // Yournal of Korean Medical Science/ 2015. (1). 25-32.
7. Брин В.Б., Митциев А.К., Митциев К.Г. Способ коррекции нефротоксического действия кадмия в эксперименте // Вестник новых медицинских технологий. 2011. Т XVII. №2. с. 194195. [V.B. Brin., A.K. Mitciev., K.G. Mitciev. Sposob korrekcii nefrotoksicheskogo dejstvija kadmija v jeksperimente // Vestnik novyh medicinskih tehnologij. 2011. (2). 194-195. (in Russ).].
8. Арушанян Э.Б., Ованесов К.Б. Значение мелатонина для деятельности почек // Медицинский вестник Северного Кавказа. 2018. №.13. с. 43-49 [Arushanjan Je.B., Ovanesov K.B. Znachenie melatonina dlja dejatel'nosti pochek //Medicalnews of North Caucasus. 2018. V. (13). 43-49 (in Russ)].
9. Арушанян Э.Б. Ограничение окислительного стресса как основная причина универсальных защитных свойств мелатонина// Экспериментальная и клин. фармакол. 2012. Т.75. с.44-45. [Arushanjan Je.B. Ogranichenie okislitel'nogo stressa kak osnovnaja prichina universal'nyh zashhitnyh svojstv melatonina// Jeksperimental'naja i klin. farmakol. 2012. (75). 44-45 (in Russ)].
10. Chan C.W., Song Y., Ailenberg M., et. all. Studies of melatonin effects jn epitheiia using the human embryonic kidney -293 cell line // Endocrinology.1997. (138). 1483-1496.
Petya V. Ivanova1, Ana I. Maneva2
Department Chemistry and Biochemistry, Pharmaceutical Faculty, Medical University of Plovdiv, 15A :Vasil Aprilov Blvd, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria Department Chemistry and Biochemistry, Pharmaceutical Faculty, Medical University of Plovdiv, 15A :Vasil Aprilov Blvd, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR, HUMAN TELOMERASE SUBUNIT -HTERT, PROTEIN KINASE D1 AND P16INK4A IN NORMAL KERATINOCYTES AND PREMALIGNANT LESIONS OF SKIN AND ORAL CAVITY.
Abstract. Identification of mutations as markers for early malignant transformation could be more appropriate not only for early diagnosis of cancer but could potentially influence treatment strategies in HNC, since mutations in EGFR and Ras genes are closely associated with resistance to cancer treatment. Mutations in Ras, p53 (early), the gene of EGFR (in BCCs not detected), and HTERT promoter could be used as markers of cancer transformation. Mutations in p53 are detected early in PMDs, associated with high risk for early transformation into Oral SCC. Mutations in Ras are not detected in Potentially Malignant Disorders (PMDs), with exception of Actinic keratoses (AK), Keratoacanthomas (KA) and papillomas. Since increased expression of hTERT is an early event in the pathogenesis of hyperproliferative skin deseases, overexpressed hTERT is considered as a proproliferative (proinflammatory) marker, rather than cancer marker, in contrary to its mutations. Mutations in HTERT are detected in both Spinocellular carcinoma (SCC) and Basocellular carcinoma (BCC), UV-signature.
Increased expression mainly of MMP-9 and MT1-MMP (MMP-2), are now considered as markers for aggressive cancer phenotype in both cancers. Using EMT markers (vimentin, fibronectin, N-cadherin, vs, E-cadherin; and transcriptional factors - Snail, Slug, Twist; HIF-1a, a-SMA), we could not differentiate late PMDs of early cancer lesions. These markers are useful for detection of aggressive alteration in tumour pathogenesis, which is of importance when a surgical procedure is planned. COX-2 stain was highest in SCCs and aggressive BCCs. Increased expression of PKD1 was detected in BCCs in contrary to SCC. There is no currently data for the expression of PKD1 in PMDs, leading to SCC, nor for detected mutations in PKD1 gene in SCC and BCCs. PKD1 is upregulated and down-regulated in BCC and SCC, respectively. We speculate here that the molecular mechanism - increased NFKB-hTert-PKD1-NFKB-hTert, resulting in p16INK4a mutations and turn of PKD1 function, is connected with the progression of chronic inflammation in cancer development.
Keywords: PKD1, Protein Kinase D1, hTert, EGFR, p16INK4a, mutations, MMPs, Metalloproteinases, PMDs, Potentially Malignant Disorders, Leukoplakia, Erythroplakia, Actinic keratose (AK), Keratoacanthoma (KA), SCC, Spinocellular carcinoma, BCC, Basocellular carcinoma;
Abbreviations:
1. PMDs - Potentially Malignant Disorders
2. SCC - Squamous cell carcinoma (Spinocellular carcinoma)
3. oSCC - oral SCC
4. cSCC - cutaneous SCC
5. NHSCC - Head and Neck SCC
6. HNC - Head and Neck Cancer
7. BCC - Basal cell carcinoma (Basocellular carcinoma)
8. EMT - Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition
9. MET - Mesenchymal to Epithelial Transition
10. EGFR (HER1, ErbBl) - Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
11. EGF - Epidermal Growth Factor
12. HB-EGF - Heparin-binding EGF
13. AR - Amphiregulin
14. TGF-a - Tumor (Transforming) Growth Factor-alpha
15. MAPK - Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase
16. ERK1/2 - Extracellular signal Regulated Kinase /
17. PI3K - phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
18. mTOR - mammalian Target of Rapamycin
19. STAT - Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription
20. HH - Hedgehog
21. PTCH - Patched
22. SMO - Smoothened
23. GLI - Glioma Associated
24. HIF1 - Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1
25. PKC - Protein Kinase C
26. PKD1 - Protein Kinase D1
27. PRKD1 - PKD1 gene
28. NF-kB - Nuclear Factor kappa B
29. MMPs - Matrix Metalloproteinases
30. COX-2 - Cyclooxygenase-2 (PGHS-2 -Prostaglandin H Synthase)
31. hTERT - Human telomerase catalytic protein subunit
Introduction:
Oral PMDs (potentially malignant disorders) are known as leukoplakia, erythroplakia, lichen planus, submucous fibrosis, actinic cheilitis (cheratosis) and palatal keratosis associated with inverted smoking, discoid lupus erythematosus, Marjolin ulcer, immunodeficiency in relation to cancer predisposition and some inherited cancer syndromes.1,2 The most common are leukoplakia, erythroplakia, lichen planus and submucous fibrosis. Leukoplakia is a clinical presentation that is defined by the WHO (World Health Organozation) as a "white patch or plaque that cannot be characterized clinically or pathologically as any other disease" and is, by far, the most common precancer, accounting for over 80% of potentially malignant oral disorders. In addition, leukoplakia is also a relatively common oral lesion, ranging from 1 to 5% in the general population. However, it does not have
the highest malignant transformation risk among precancerous lesions. Oral erythroplakia, a relatively rare (reported incidence: 0.02-0.80%) red lesion of the oral cavity that cannot be removed, has a much higher malignant transformation risk than leukoplakia; up to 50% of these lesions are invasive OSCC and 40% are carcinoma in situ?
Evaluation of an asymptomatic patient for early-stage cancer, based on its physical features alone, is frequently compromised because malignant and benign lesions may not be clinically distinguishable. Consequently, approximately 60% of oral cancers are advanced by the time they are detected, and approximately 15% of patients have another cancer in a nearby area such as the larynx, esophagus or lungs. Early diagnosis of oral cancer plays a key role in disease progression, treatment response, and ultimately, quality of life and patient survival. Therefore, there is a need to identify and use molecular biomarkers to evaluate individuals with potentially malignant disorders who are at a high risk of developing OSCC and those with early-stage malignant lesions.3
Alterations in genes and pathways that regulate cellular signaling, cell cycle, proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, genomic stability, motility, angiogenesis and metastasis are significantly associated with development and progression of a potentially malignant disorder to OSCC. Aberrant expression and function of molecules involved in these signaling networks have been considered as biomarkers for risk assessment of malignant transformation. These biomarkers, includes increased expression of hTERT (Human telomerase catalytic protein subunit), EGF-R (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) (and its ligands -EGF (Epidermal Growth Factor), TGF-a (Tumor Growth Factor-alpha), HB-EGF (Heparin-binding EGF) and AR (Amphiregulin) (see below))), upregulated NF-&B closely connected with increase in COX-2 (Cyclooxygenase-2; PGHS-2 - Prostaglandin G/H Synthase) expression.4 COX-2 is a target gene of NF-&B and COX-2 stain was found increasing from hyperplasia to dysplasia and was highest in squamous cell carcinoma.5 Its expression was significantly higher in the infiltrating pattern of BCC compared with the nodular and superficial subtypes in the primary BCC group. Furthurmore expression was significantly higher in the recurrent BCC group than in the primary BCC group.6
Although there is some but not significant advance in the understanding of molecular mechanism connected with the development of PMDs and their prograssion to cancer (in oral cavity mostly to SCCs), there is almost no advanced in their diagnostic markers or in their treatment strategies, consequence of which is often their malignisation or cancer development.
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the second most common cancer arising in the head and neck with
32 East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 devastating effects on communication, swallowing, and, most importantly, survival. This tumor is occurring most commonly in the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx, arising from the spinous layer of the skin and epitelium. Sun exposure (UV- light), ionizing radiation, papilloma viruses (PPV) infection, immune suppression, and chronic inflammation (or chronic trauma-mucosa) may lead to development of SCC.7 Men are at greater risk than women with the two greatest risk factors consistently being tobacco and alcohol use.8 In 2011, there were over 11,460 deaths from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cancers (HNSCC) in the United States and over 300,000 deaths worldwide. Most HNSCC patients present with stage III/IV disease have a 5-year survival rate below 40%. HNSCC patients with metastatic disease have extremely poor prognosis and a survival rate of less than 10%.9
Oral and Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is a malignant tumor that can occur in normal skin and oral mucosa, but commonly evolves from precursor lesions pre-cancer or PMD (potentially malignant disorders) (see above). Oral epithelium differs from the skin only by the lack of stratum corneum.
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are slow-growing, locally invasive, rarely metastatic epidermal skin tumours which mainly affect white skinned people. This type of cancer is often located on the face and neck and is difficult to limit clinically. It can significant local destruction and disfugurment if treated inadequatly. It is consider to arise from multipotential (stem) cells within the basal layer of the epidermis or follicular structures and can develop without a premalignant lesion in both hereditary and sporadic fashion. It can significantly more rarely (contrary to SCC) develop on the basis of precancerous lesions, including: postradiation dermatitis (60% of cases transforms into BCC); nevus sebaceous (transformation into BCC is 15%); actinic keratosis (transformation into BCC is 10%); chemical keratosis, xeroderma pigmentosum; inflammatory changes with scars and hypertrophied scars after burn injuries.10
Except UVB, ionizing radiation, chemical carcinogen (e.g. arsenic) and possibly infectiones with human papillomaviruses, have been associated with BCCs development. Some common deseases as postorgan transplant patients (most frequently after heart and renal transplantation), pharmacological immunosuppression combined with UVB radiation, leukaemic patients are also risk factors. Global statistics unanimously indicate that BCC is one of the most common neoplasms in Europe, Australia and the USA, and the number of new cases is increasing every year. Only in the USA, more than one million cases of skin cancers are detected every year (American Cancer Society, 2008).10,11
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) in skin and oral pathology
EGFR is mapped to chromosome 7 short arm q22, spanning 110 kb of DNA divided into 28 exons. In normal cells, the expression of EGFR is estimated to be from 40,000-100,000 receptors per cell, whereas
UB
BtSSjB
overexpression of more than 106 receptors per cell is observed in cancer cells. EGF regulates its own receptor, as it increases EGFR RNA expression by stimulating the expression of ETF (EGFR-specific transcription factor). Other proteins that modulate the EGFR promoter include E1A, Sp1, and AP2. The interaction between DNA topoisomerase I and c-JUN has also been shown to regulate EGFR gene expression.12
Activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) a receptor tyrosine kinase, has been shown to stimulate cell cycle progression of normal epidermal keratinocytes. In normal skin, the EGF-R (also known as HER1 or ErbBl) is most strongly, although not exclusively, expressed in the basal layer of the epidermis, consistent with the involvement of the EGF-R in epidermal growth control. A lot of observations indicate that abnormalities in expression of the EGF-R and/or its ligands EGF (Epidermal Growth Factor), TGF-a (Tumor Growth Factor-alpha), HB-EGF (Heparin-binding EGF) and AR (Amphiregulin) are common features of hyperproliferative (PMDs) and neoplastic epithelia. For example, in psoriatic epidermis, the EGF-R is overexpressed not just in the basal layer, but in all nucleated strata of the epidermis, consistent with the suprabasal proliferation that occurs in this disease. Furthermore, both TGFa and AR are found at elevated levels throughout the nucleated layers of psoriatic epidermis. In squamous carcinomas, overexpression of the EGFR is commonly observed consistent with the view that EGFR signaling is upregulated and constitutive in such tumors. Furthermore, epithelial neoplasms frequently coexpress high levels not only of the EGF-R but also of its ligands, EGF, TGFa or AR thereby creating constitutive autocrine loops dependent on the EGF-R. Direct support for a role of EGFR activation in the development of skin tumors comes from studies in transgenic mice, in which overexpression of TGF-a targeted to the epidermis elicits hyperplasia, hyperkeratosis, papillomas, and squamous cell carcinomas.13,14
EFGR is involved in multiple downstream signaling pathways influencing cell growth, angiogenesis, and invasion. Downstream EGFR signaling activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway (Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK1/2), p38 MAPK, JNK as well as the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K)/protein kinase B (Akt) pathway. Activation of the MAPK pathway leads to increased expression of antiapoptotic proteins like Bcl-x2 and inhibition of proapoptotic proteins like BAD. Signaling through the PI3-K/Akt pathway ultimately leads to inhibition of the tumor suppressor gene p53.14 All these results pointed the role of EGFR in a proliferative state and inhibition of tumor suppressor function.15 Other pathways which are activated from EGFR are phospholipase PLCy - PKC/PKD1, Src and STAT. Amplified EGFR signaling induces uncontrolled cell growth and a malignant phenotype.16
The enhanced EGFR expression on the keratinocytes in OLP (Oral Lichen Planus) lesions and
UB
bbsm
the up-regulation of EGF-like ligands in keratinocytes and infiltrating mononuclear cells could contribute to the carcinogenesis and pathogenesis of OLP. Of the receptors, only EGFR mRNA and protein were more highly expressed in OLP compared with NOM (normal oral mucosa) tissues. Regarding the ligands, the mRNAs of Amphiregulin (AREG), Epiregulin (EREG), and Heparin-Binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) were more highly expressed in OLP compared with NOM tissues. These ligands were strongly expressed by infiltrating lamina propria lymphocytes as well as epithelial keratinocytes in OLP lesions, as shown by immunohistochemistry.17
Acording another work, genes involved in human OLP (Oral Lichen Planus) pathogenesis are identified and ranked according to their number of interactions, in order to obtain a broader view of its molecular mechanisms and to plan targeted experimentations. 132 genes were identified and five of them (namely, JUN, EGFR, FOS, IL2, ITGB4) were classified as leaders. Interestingly, all of them but EGFR were up-regulated and were widely distributed in the network (in term of topological parameters such as stress, eccentricity and radiality) and showed higher topological coefficients than the other genes.18
Zhao M et al. studied the role of EGFR in the genesis of squamous cell by means of observation on its expression in oral lichen planus (OLP), squamous cell papilloma (SCP) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The expression of EGFR was weak in OLP without erosive and ulcerative lesion. The strongly positive rates of EGFR in OLP with erosive and ulcerative lesion group, SCP group and SCC group were 20%, 25% and 60%, respectively. There were significant differences between the OLP with erosive and ulcerative lesion and OLP without erosive and ulcerative lesion. The expression of EGFR increased significantly from OLP, SCP to SCC.19
In another study Ribeiro DC et al. investigate the immunoexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in a sample of oral leukoplakias (OL) and to determine the receptor's association with dysplasia, tobacco consumption, lesion site, and proliferation rate. EGFR is expressed in leukoplakia regardless of dysplasia, but EGFR positivity should be more frequent in lesions sited in areas of high cancer risk. According authors the association between EGFR and p27 may represent an important mechanism in the control of cellular proliferation and malignant progression of oral epithelium and therefore warrants further investigation. Although EGFR should be overexpressed in some oral leukoplakias, the factors that may interfere with this expression and the influence of this receptor on epithelial proliferation have yet to be investigated.20
Yamada T. examined the relationship between the oral leukoplakia and cancer, an immunohistochemical study of the EGF-receptor had been performed by the avidin-biotin peroxidase-complex method and silver enhancement with anti-human EGF-receptor antibody (Bio-yeda). Totally 61 cases of leukoplakias without relation to cancer, 20 cases of leukoplakias with relation to cancer and 31 cases of squamous cell
East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 33 carcinomas were examined. Seventy percent of leukoplakias and 55% of cancer cases were positive for the EGF-receptor. The proportion of the EGF-receptor-positive cells in the leukoplakia cases was slightly decreased in proportion to the degree of the epithelial dysplasia. The proportion of the EGF-receptor-positive cells in the poorly differentiated type cancer cases (3%) was fewer than that in the differentiated type cancer cases (31%). In the leukoplakia related to cancer, the leukoplakia and cancer of the same patient did not always show the same pattern of EGF-receptor.21
Bagan JV et al. studied compared the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) copy number in patients with potentially malignant oral disorders (PMODs) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). They estimated the EGFR copy number in both groups using real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. They used laser microdissection (LMD) for EGFR amplification, and overexpression was performed. Group 1 comprised 20 patients with oral leukoplakia and group 2 comprised 19 cases of OSCC. The EGFR copy number was higher in group 2 (9.1 ± 6.2) than in group 1 (3.8 ± 1.5). The greatest copy number was found in the non-homogeneous leukoplakias, but the difference in homogeneous cases was not significant (Mann-Whitney test, P>0.05). In group 2, the EGFR copy number was higher in advanced stages than in early stages, but again lacked statistical significance. The EGFR copy number may be a useful biomolecular marker to differentiate PMODs from OSCC. The EGFR was higher in non-homogeneous leukoplakias and in the advanced stages of OSCC.22
One of the most well-known biomarkers in HNSCC (head and neck SCC) is the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR). Overexpression of EGFR in HNSCC has been associated with poorer overall survival and recurrence, and up to 90% of HNSCC patients express high EGFR.8
Several lines of evidence have shown that stimulation with EGF, as well as H2O2, UV, therapeutic agents, or ionizing radiation cause the EGFR to translocate to the nucleus, with nuclear EGFR signaling playing roles in cell proliferation, tumor progression, DNA repair. High levels of nuclear EGFR have been found in various types of cancers, and nuclear EGFR signaling has been reported to mediate radio-resistance and chemo-resistance, such as to ionizing radiation and cisplatin. Nuclear EGFR appears to be the full-length receptor. The mechanism by which the EGFR translocates to the nucleus has been studied, but is still far from clear. However, there is no established mechanism for the translocation of endosomal EGFR to nucleus.In the nucleus, the EGFR supports gene regulation by acting as a transcriptional co-activator. It has been shown that nuclear EGFR aids in the transcription of important cell cycle progression mediators, including CYCLIN D1 and c-MYC, among other proto-oncogenes . The interaction of nuclear EGFR to the CYCLIN D1 gene promoter has been better studied, and has been shown to require EGFR interaction with two proteins, Mucin-1 (MUC-1) and RNA helicase A (RHA). In this way, nuclear EGFR
34 East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 signaling represents another way by which the EGFR promotes cell cycle progression, highlighting the breadth and redundancy of the EGFR signal transduction network in cancer progression.12
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and p16 (a surrogate marker of human papillomavirus [HPV] infection) expression are strong prognostic factors in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Husain H et al. examined an HPV-negative (SQ20B) and an HPV-positive (UMSCC47) HNSCC cell line for EGFR and yH2AX expression. A tissue microarray containing 123 cores obtained from 101 HNSCC tumors was analyzed for EGFR expression by automated quantitative analysis and p16 expression by immunohistochemical staining, and these results were correlated with available clinical data. SQ20B had higher EGFR expression than UMSCC47. Nuclear localization of EGFR on activation with transforming growth factor-a was observed in SQ20B, but not in UMSCC47. SQ20B also had increased yH2AX foci compared to UMSCC47, suggesting that SQ20B has more DNA damage compared to UMSCC47. Total and nuclear EGFR was reliably obtained from 80 of 101 patients. p16 levels were determined in 87 of 101 patients. p16 levels were strongly associated with the oropharyngeal subsite and poorly differentiated histology. Expression of total and nuclear EGFR was higher in p16-negative tumors compared to p16-positive tumors.90
According Yamakoshi et al., the level of p16INK4a expression in early papillomas was slightly but consistently higher than those seen in normal skin. This level of p16INK4a expression does not appear to be high enough to induce senescence cell cycle arrest. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that p16INK4a may play a more important role or roles in late papillomas, presumably preventing malignant conversion of benign tumors. Indeed, by 30 wk after DMBA/TPA treatment, 33% of p16INK4a knockout mice (C57BL/6 background) had at least one carcinoma compared with 5% of the wild-type mice (unpublished data), indicating that p16INK4a plays an important role or roles in preventing malignant conversion of benign tumors. These results are somewhat consistent with a previous study showing that the tumor-free survival of DMBA treated mice was substantially reduced in p16INK4a knockout mice.190 However, according Xu J et al., the low-risk HPV-positive oral papillary lesions in this study showed a lower proliferative index by MIB-1 staining and patchy p16 or no p16 staining.197
Expression of p16 and c-Myc could not be used for differentiation of AK from SCC, because of the simillar staining, although increased expression of both p16 and c-Myc during the progression of skin from actinic keratosis to in situ squamous cell carcinoma to invasive squamous cell carcinoma was observed.198,199,44
Ultraviolet light plays a fundamental role as an initiator and promoter of carcinogenesis of SCC, allowing the accumulation of genetic alterations that allows a selective growth advantage. The TP53 (p53) gene often mutates and Ras is frequently activated, but
UB
BtSgSB
with low frequency of mutations. Recently, frequent mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)23 have been detected in lung cancer, mainly deletions in exon 19 and L858R mutation in exon 21. These are located at the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain (TK). EGFR TK mutations produce activation of the signaling pathways downstream and preferentially activated antiapoptotic pathways (PI3K/AKT, JAKSTAT and ERK/MAPK). These mutations are correlated with the clinical response of patients to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (poor response to Gefinitib, Erlotinib). Glioblastoma shows another EGFR mutation (EGFRvIII)23, corresponding to a deletion of the extracellular domain, and it is present in 24-67% of these tumors. This variant has been found in 42% of HNSCC, related to the poor response to monoclonal antibody cetuximab (competitively inhibits EGFR). Interestingly, EGFRvIII displays ligand-independent signaling, but has low constitutive activity. The low constitutive activity is enough to impart cancer cells with increased signaling, however its growth advantage is due to the fact that these receptors are not downregulated by endocytosis.12 Many observations show that there are abnormalities in the expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and/or its ligands in HNSCC with frequent activation of multiple pathways downstream EGFR, and unrelated to RAS mutation.24 EGFR gene is often amplified (30% of OSCCs2) and/or with activating mutations in cancer cells.16 Other mutations detected in SCC are activating mutations or gains of Ras genes (amplification in 30% of OSCCs, mutation in 35% of OSCCs, mutation in 5% of oral cancers, but in 55% of lip cancers). Mutations in TP53 (UV-signature) (mutation in 79% of HNCs), loses of CDKN2A (p16INK4A) (hypermethylation in 44% oral leukoplakia lesions, in 76% of OSCCs), and inactivating mutations of NOTCH.25,2
SCC typically exhibits a broad spectrum of progressively advanced malignancies, ranging from premalignant actinic keratosis (AK) (precursor lesions) to squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCIS), invasive cSCC and finally metastatic cSCC. The primary risk factor for AK is chronic UV exposure. Genetically, AKs and cSCCs are associated with amplifications and activating mutations of the Ras oncogene indicate that 11% of cSCCs harbor activating Ras mutations (6% HRAS, 3% NRAS, 2% KRAS; n = 371 cases). In cSCCs Ras is frequently activated, but with low frequency of mutations. Ras mutations are infrequent in Western patients and detected in fewer than 5% of oral cancers. In contrast, 55% of lip cancers have H-ras mutation, which is also present in 35% of oral cancers in Asian populations in association with betel nut chewing. Whereas only benign tumors were observed after KRasG12D expression alone, combined p53 deletion and oncogenic KRas expression initiated invasive cSCCs.26,27 There is no data for detected Ras mutations in other PMDs with exception of Keratoacanthomas (KA) (28.6%)196 and papillomas.44 KRAS gene exon 2 G12C presented mutation in the Oncocytic Schneiderian (sinonasal) papillomas (OSP) -associated adenocarcinoma.188
Up to 30% of all human tumors harbor mutations in canonical RAS genes (KRAS, HRAS, NRAS).28,29 K-ras is a downstream mediator of EGFR-induced cell signaling, and ras mutations confer constitutive activation of the signal pathways without EGFR activation.2 KRAS mutations have been associated with primary resistance to Gefitinib or Erlotinib (EGFR kinase inhibitors).30,14,31
In organotypic 3D culture of human esophageal cells (keratinocytes) EGFR overexpression and mutant p53 resulted in transformation and invasive growth.32 Overexpression of inactivated or mutated forms of p53 in oral epithelial dysplasia has been associated with high risk for transformation to early stage OSCC.33
P53, a tumor suppressor gene, has been implicated in the early pathogenesis of HNSCC, as it controls cell growth through regulation of the cell-cycle and apoptosis. P53 acts as transcription factor of cell cycle inhibitors such as p21Waf1/Cip1/Sdl1 and prevents the cell from going beyond phase G1 of the cell cycle, permitting DNA repair. If this is not possible, p53 induces apoptosis of these cells to avoid the transmission of potentially carcinogenic information.2 In a study analyzing HNSCC patients with a history of tobacco and alcohol use, Brennan et al. found a significantly higher proportion of patients with mutations of p53 and other distinct sites when compared to nonsmokers and nondrinkers. p53 inactivation or mutations have been found in up to 50% of HNSCC patients and have been shown to be associated with decreased survival. Kuo et al. detected mutations in 35% of OSCCs, Balz et al. in 79% of HNCs (head and neck carcinomas).34,2 In addition to p53, mutations in the retinoblastoma (Rb) gene are involved in the pathogenesis of HNSCC.
Park HR et al. evaluated the expression profiles of p63, p53, survivin, and hTERT in usual skin cancers, including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and putative preneoplastic epidermal lesions, including actinic keratosis (AK), Bowen's disease, and porokeratosis. BCCs showed diffuse p63 expression and SCCs heterogeneous p63 expression with negativity in terminally differentiated squamous cells. All preneoplastic epidermal lesions showed p63 expression in all cell layers. p53 was found in seven of 10 cases of BCCs, all 10 cases of SCCs, and nine of 10 cases of Bowen's disease. AK and porokeratosis revealed focal to moderate p53 expression. Survivin was found in eight of 10 cases of SCCs and eight of 10 cases of Bowen's disease. Six of 10 cases of BCCs revealed weak survivin positivity. AK and porokeratosis showed survivin expression confined to the basal layer. hTERT expression was found in most cases of skin cancers and preneoplastic lesions. p63 expression may be a marker of basal/progenitor cells and a diagnostic marker in skin tumors. p63 expression is not related to p53 expression in these tumors. This study points to a putative role of survivin and hTERT in the development of certain skin cancers. In addition, authors' data support the concept of porokeratosis being a premalignant condition.35
Although BCC are with basal origin, EGFR is expressed at a significantly higher level in SCC than in BCC.36 In general, BCCs seem to have relatively stable genomes - the few published study suggest that they have lower levels of genomic instability than do many extracutaneus cancers.14 Methylation commences in UV exposed skin at a relatively early age and occurs in skin prior to the onset of recognizable preneoplastic changes in BCCs.37 There is no any data concerning detected mutations in EGFR in BCC, although PKD1 is lining down from the receptor and its increase expression could be explain by positive mutations (amplification) or gain in the PKD1 or EGFR genes. However, in BCCs are detected activation mutations mostly in HH (Hedgehog) pathway14, inactivating mutations in the tumor suppressor PTCH1 (90% of sporadic BCC), and activating mutations in other Hedgehog pathway genes, such as constitutively activate SMO15, SHH, or GLI40 are found less frequenly (~10% of tumors)25 14 169 in TP53 (UV-signature) (56% of all types of BCCs2, Ras dysregulation in 100% and mutations in 10% to 30% (50%) of BCCs38 39 and hTert mutations in 56% (78%) of BCCs.25,11 None of the 61 non-melanoma skin cancer (30 SCC and 31 BCC) samples revealed any PIK3CA and AKT1 hotspot mutations at the investigated loci. The authors conclude that PIK3CA and AKT1 hotspot mutations do not contribute to the activation of the PI3K/AKT signalling pathway in non-melanoma skin cancer.41 Deletion of 10q23, where PTEN is located, is infrequent event in human BCC11, PKCs and STAT3 mutations in BCC are also rare.42,43,44
Tsao AS et al. summarized that patients with head and neck premalignant (and malignant) changes consist of a diverse population and should be treated differently depending on their molecular genotype. Patients with minimal genetic changes may be treated with single agent retinoids, v.D3 or other agents. Those with more accumulated genetic changes will require combination chemoprevention therapies. Lesions that have advanced genetic changes with mutant p53 may benefit from targeted p53 therapy, and those lesions that express EGFR and COX-2 may require inhibitors of EFGR and COX-2. Other strategies include the oncolytic adenovirus dl1520 (ONYX-015), which selectively targets p53-deficient cells. Ongoing trials and future strategies include studying EGFR inhibitors, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF-R) inhibitors, demethylating agents, farnesyltransferase inhibitors, celecoxib, vitamin E, and Bowman-Birk inhibitors.45
hTERT in skin and oral pathology Telomeres are specialized chromatin structures at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes and are crucial for genome (chromosome) stability, cell growth control and carcinogenesis. Normally, they protect chromosomes from end to end fusion, degradation and recombination. At each DNA replication cycle, 30-150 base pairs of telomeric DNA are lost, driving cells into metabolic state of irreversible growth arrest and replecative senescence.46,47,30,48 Telomeres are repetitive DNA (TTAGGG) elements at the ends of the
36 East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 chromosome. Telomerase is a multimeric ribonucleoprotein containing an RNA component that includes in its sequence the template for telomere synthesis and a catalytic protein subunit that is a reverstranscriptase (hTERT). The RNA component of the enzyme is expressed constitutivly, but catalytic subunit-hTERT is thought to be activity-limiting component of the telomerase holoenzyme. Telomerase is active in germ cells, stem cells and approximately 90% of cancers (including BCC and SCC), but not in most normal somatic cells (the proliferative basal layer of epidermis expresses telomerase, but cell cycle arrest and differentiation of these cells correlates with inhibition of telomerase activity).30,49 Human telomerase catalytic protein subunit hTERT is crucial for telomerase activity. Although increased hTERT expression is sufficient to immortalize normal human cells in culture, spontaneous immortalization is extremely rare which suggests that hTERT expression is under strong negative control. Characterization of the hTERT promoter has allowed for the analysis of potential mechanisms of hTERT expression and regulation. The hTERT promoter is very complex and contains a great number of canonical and non-canonical sequences that bind or potentially bind a variety of transcription factors.46 It is known that NF-kB transactivates c-Myc to stimulate hTERT promoter activity in intimal smooth muscle cell, human T lymphocytes, HTLV-I-associated adult T-cell leukemia and irradiated HER2-positive tumour-derived breast cancer cells.50,51,52,53 A feed-forward regulation between TERT and NF-kB was suggested as telomerase directly regulates NF-kB dependent gene expression by binding to the NF-kB p65 subunit. This leads to the recruitment of a subset of NF-kB promoters such as Interleukin 6 (IL6) and TNFa. These cytokines, which are critical for inflammation and cancer progression, together with NF-kB, can transcriptionally upregulate telomerase levels.54
Telomerase reactivation in telomerase-negative cells can be achieved by chromatin remodeling, such that the promoter region of hTERT is more accessible. Myc:Max complexes activate transcription by binding to E-boxes, but these sites are often being competed for by the Mad:Max repressor complex. Mad represses the hTERT promoter through the interaction of HDACs. This complex can be repressed, though, by chromatin condensation through HDAC inhibitors.55
Also present within the core hTERT promoter are GC-boxes, which are binding sites for Sp1 transcription factor. Sp1can interact with c-Myc and stimulate telomerase expression through the transcriptional abilityof MBD1-containing chromatin-associated factor1(MCAF1). Furthe rinvolvement of Sp1 and hTERT expression are explored. Mutations in any of the five GC-boxes reduce core promoter activity. Other key binding sites found in the hTERT promoter include AP1,which binds the Jun/Fos dimer as a transcriptional repressor, AP-2, which shows tumor- specific hTERT upregulation, and HIF-1,which upregulates hTERT expression in hypoxic events. Mutations that generate
an ETS binding site play a role in increasing hTERT promoter activity.55
Canonically DNA methylation is associated with gene silencing. This hypermethylation is associated with gene silencing of tumor suppressors such as p16 and hMLHl (a part of DNA mismatch repair). hTERT is an exception to this rule, though, considering that the majority of the hTERT promoter region contains hypermethylated CpG islands in most cancer cells where it is expressed. Methylation status can vary among cell lines. Hypermethylation decreases the affinity of transcriptionl activators for the hTERT promoter region, while hypomethylation allows for binding of transcriptional repressors.55
5-aza-20-deoxycytidine (5-azadC) is acommon DNA demethylating agent involved in the reexpression of hTERT in hTERT-negative cells. Demethylationby5-azadC restores the binding capability of CTCF to the first exon of hTERT and E2F-1 to the promoter. Therefore,one of the main roles of hTERT methylation is probably to prevent binding of the CTCF and E2F-1 repressors and permit transcription. Hypermethylation of the hTERT promoter during senescence is linked to diminished telomerase activity, as well as hTERT mRNA expression. Exposing these cells to 5-azadC restores hTERT expression.55 Regulation of hTert is reviewed in details in:54,55.
In a study Crowe DL et al. examined the regulation of telomerase expression in anchorage-deprived normal human epidermal keratinocytes and squamous cell carcinoma lines. Anchorage-deprived cells underwent rapid loss of telomerase activity. Attachment loss was associated with increased ERK1 activity, G1 to S phase progression, and subsequent G2 arrest. Adhesion to collagen via specific integrin subunits inhibited ERK1 activity and telomerase repression. Loss of telomerase expression was associated with recruitment of an Rb/HDAC1 (transcriptional co-repressors, coregulator of Snail) repressor complex to the -98 E2F site of the hTERT promoter. The authors propose a mechanism by which anchorage deprivation inhibits telomerase activity in stratified squamous epithelial cells and squamous cell carcinoma lines.49
hTERT expression is used as a surrogate for telomerase activity. It has been suggested that telomerase activity is a biomarker of cell proliferation, not of malignant transformation (see below). Telomerase activity is detected in the proliferative basal layer of epidermis, but anchorage-deprived cells underwent rapid loss of telomerase activity. In the studies of Liu H et al., staining for hTERT was found in the nuclei of epidermal cells, and more intensely in the nucleoli of cells in psoriasis, primarily in some proliferating keratinocytes. This indicates that telomerase activity does not always correlate with the malignant phenotype. The finding, that staining for hTERT was observed in keratinocytes in the upper to middle layers of the epidermis in psoriasis vulgaris, supports the concept that proliferating and nonproliferating cells can express human telomerase RNA (hTER). It may be speculated that one possible
UB
ansa
mechanism of epidermis hyperplasia in psoriasis might be the increased telomerase activity in psoriatic epidermis.56
hTEP1 (telomerase associated protein 1) and hTR (human telomerase RNA component) but also hTERT (human telomerase reverse transcriptase) expression were detected in the basal cells of normal oral mucosa, and the cells expressing these mRNAs were also seen in the upper layer of leukoplakia of gingiva, and a heterogeneous pattern of expression was observed in the oral SCC tissues. These results indicate that there are at least two steps in the increase of telomerase activity during carcinogenesis in oral squamous cells; a change in distribution of cells expressing these telomerase components and the over-expression of hTERT gene in individual cells.57
Oral carcinogenesis is a multi-step process. One possible step is the development of potentially malignant disorders known as leukoplakia and erythroplakia33. The objective of the study of Cabral et al. was to use immunohistochemistry to analyze the patterns of expression of the cell-cycle regulatory proteins p53 and p16INK4a in potentially malignant disorders (PMD) of the oral mucosa (with varying degrees of dysplasia) and in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) to correlate them with the expression of telomerase (hTERT). Fifteen PMD and 30 OSCC tissue samples were analyzed. Additionally, 5 cases of oral epithelial hyperplasia (OEH) were added to analyze clinically altered mucosa presenting as histological hyperplasia without dysplasia. p53 positivity was observed in 93.3% of PMD, in 63.3% of OSCC and in 80% of OEH. Although there was no correlation between p53 expression and the grade of dysplasia, all cases with severe dysplasia presented p53 suprabasal immunoexpression. p16INK4a expression was observed in 26.7% of PMD, in 43.3% of OSCC and in 2 cases of OEH. The p16INK4a expression in OEH, PMD and OSCC was unable to differentiate non-dysplastic from dysplastic oral epithelium. hTERT positivity was observed in all samples of OEH and PMD and in 90% of OSCC. The high hTERT immunoexpression in all three lesions indicates that telomerase is present in clinically altered oral mucosa but does not differentiate hyperplastic from dysplastic oral epithelium. In PMD of the oral mucosa, the p53 immunoexpression changes according to the degree of dysplasia by mechanisms independent of p16INK4a and hTERT.33
Shimamoto H examined the status of telomerase activities in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs), precancerous lesions, and also cell lines established from OSCCs, by using a non-radioactive PCR-based TRAP (telomeric repeat amplification protocol) assay. Telomerase activities in 23 of 30 OSCCs, 8 of 17 leukoplakias, 0 of 5 normal tissues, and in 8 of 8 OSCC cell lines and 0 of 5 normal human keratinocyte cultures. According the authors the received results indicated that telomerase activity might have some association with carcinogenesis and might be used as a tumor marker in OSCC.48
In the of Palani J et al. study, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to detect the
East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 37 expression of hTERT protein in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) (n=30), leukoplakia (n=15), oral submucous fibrosis OSF (n=15) and normal oral mucosa (n=10). The cellular localization of immunostain, intensity of stain, mean nuclear labeling index (LI) and mean nuclear labeling score (LS) of hTERT protein were studied. There was increased expression of hTERT protein in OSCC and leukoplakia samples when compared to normal oral mucosa. The cellular localization, LI and LS in OSF were significantly different from OSCC and leukoplakia.58
Bettendorf O et al. analyzed telomerase activity in capsule tissues in a rat model with chronic inflammation and in tumor. Significant elevated telomerase activity was found in tumor tissue compared with nonneoplastic tissue (p = 0.047). Cases with a strong inflammation in capsule tissue showed a specific telomerase activity. In these cases, there were no significant differences in telomerase activities compared with malignant tumor tissue. The authors demonstrated elevated telomerase activity and its diagnostic limits around model implants in a rat model, and visualize its expression not only in malignant tissue but also in inflammatory cells. So the quantitative measurement of telomerase activity should not be applied in general as a marker for malignancy in capsule tissue.59
To investigate the effects of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) on the growth of Capan-2 human pancreatic cancer cell and apoptosis. mRNA and protein expressions of hTERT, Bcl-2 and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 were assessed by real time PCR and Western blot. Knockdown of hTERT by siRNA can inhibit the growth of Capan-2 cell. The inhibitory effect is associated with the downregulation of Bcl-2 (anti-apoptosis protein) and pro-inflammatory protein COX-2.60
Additionally, Li J et al. used short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) specifically targeting hTERT were constructed and expressed in Hep-2 cells. Cell proliferation was measured by CCK-8 assay. Expression of hTERT, cyclin D1, cyclin E, c-myc, and GAPDH was detected by RT-PCR and Western blot; cyclin D1 and hTERT proteins in laryngeal squamous carcinoma tissue microarray were analyzed by quantum dots immunofluorescence. hTERT silence by shRNAs decreased the proliferation of Hep-2 cells by 76.8% at day 4 (96 h). Furthermore, transfection with hTERT shRNA for 48 h also significantly reduced expression of hTERT, cyclin D1, and c-Myc, but not cyclin E. Quantum dots immunofluorescence analysis of 36 laryngeal squamous carcinoma tissue samples found that hTERT expression was highly correlated with cyclin D1 expression. Down-regulating human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) expression will significantly suppress the cell viability of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma Hep-2, which was mainly due to the inhibition of cyclin D1 and thus G1/S phase transition.61
Combination of P53 mutation and telomerase overexpression may induce tumourigenesis in NSCLC (Non-small-cell lung cancer). There is multiple
38 East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 evidence of elevated COX-2 levels in NSCLC and their importance in lung carcinogenesis. Overexpression of COX-2 has been proposed as a biomarker for biologically aggressive types of NSCLC and poorer survival. The authors showed that P53 mutations were identified in 34.4% of tumours, the majority of them occurring in SCC (squamous cell carcinoma, 55.6%). K-RAS was mutated in 12of NSCLC tumours, the majority of the mutations being found in ADC (adenocarcinoma, 27.0%). Mutational screening detected three different COX-2 mutations and five different P53 mutations, published for the first time. With RT-PCR the authors observed that the expression of the tested genes, hTERT and COX-2, was highly significant for ADC and SCC. Statistical analysis of the combined results revealed significant correlation between expression of COX-2 and hTERT, hTERT expression and staging and survival. A positive correlation between COX-2 expression and K-RAS mutation was also observed.62
In another experiment, using GM847 cell line that presents alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) phenotype, the authors showed that expression of oncogenic RAS failed to fully transform the cells. Nonetheless, with ectopic expression of TERT, the cells acquired a tumourigenic phenotype, suggesting that TERT had an additional function required for cellular transformation and not depending on its ability to maintain telomeres. Following this line of reasoning, several studies confirmed the capacity of TERT to cooperate with other factors to promote tumourigenesis, for instance, when reduced viability and increased cancer incidence was noted in K5-TERT mice with a p53 (+/-) genetic background, indicating that telomerase could cooperate with loss of p53 function in inducing tumourogenesis in ageing organisms.63
Recent studies found TERT promoter mutations in a wide array of other human cancers, including hepatocellular cancer, bladder cancer, thyroid cancer, gliomas. However, activating mutations in the TERT promoter were recently identified in up to 71% of cutaneus melanoma, in atypical fibroxanthomas and pleomorphic dermal sarcomas, tumors arising in heavily UV-damaged skin. Griewank K. et al. investigated the presence of TERT promoter mutations in 32 BCCs and 34 cutaneous SCCs using conventional Sanger sequencing. TERT promoter mutations were identified in 18 (56%) BCCs and in 17 (50%) cutaneous SCCs. The recurrent mutations identified in their cohort were identical to those previously described in cutaneus melanoma, and showed a UV-signature.25 In another study authors found TERT promoter mutations in 78% of BCC and 50% of SCC.25 Additionally, significant correlation was found between telomerase activity and mRNA expression of EGFR in 15 cases, including non-neoplastic salivary glands and human salivary gland carcinomas.37
Fabricius EM et al. explored demonstrated telomerase activity in frozen tissues from BCC and their tumor-free margins by the PCR ELISA. In their next study the authors examined in the same frozen
UB
BtSSjB
sections immunohistochemical presence of hTERT in the nucleus. The hTERT expression in the BCC was distributed heterogeneously. The score values established by the anti-hTERT antibodies used were variably or significantly increased. In the stroma they tended to be negative, so the authors disregarded stroma hTERT. Proof of hTERT did not differ uniformly from telomerase activity. They compared the high with the lower median hTERT values in the Kaplan-Meier curve. Patients with lower hTERT scores in the center or tumor margin as shown by some of the antibodies suffered relapse earlier. Finally, they compared the hTERT expression in BCC tissues with the hTERT scores in HNSCC tissues from their previous study. Only one anti-hTERT antibody (their Ab 7) yielded significantly higher scores in BCC than in HNSCC.64
In a study using 23 urothelial cancer cell lines, Borah and coworkers confirmed that TERT promoter mutations correlate with higher levels of TERT mRNA, TERT protein, telomerase enzymatic activity and telomere length. Furthermore, TERT promoter mutations represent a possible mechanism for telomerase reactivation and also correlate with worse patient outcome and reduced disease-specific survival in two independent patient cohorts.54 For instance, in tissues that are constantly self-renewing, such as the gastrointestinal tract or the bone marrow, telomerase is already epigenetically activated and during transformation cells do not need to acquire mutations to activate telomerase. In contrast, tumor entities originating from cells with a low turnover rate, including glial cells and hepatocytes, more frequently harbor mutations that activate telomerase, mostly point mutations in the promoter region of hTERT as mentioned above. Promoter mutation being the most common point mutations in hepatocellular carcinoma, glioblastoma (GBM), bladder cancer and melanoma, where they can even constitute potential biomarkers.65 However, hTERT expression is also up-regulated in tumors via multiple genetic and epigenetic mechanisms including hTERT amplifications (3%), hTERT structural variants (3%), hTERT promoter mutations (31%) and epigenetic modifications through hTERT promoter methylation (53%). Specifically, hTERT gene amplification can result from telomere dysfunction in addition to breakage at fragile sites and formation of chromosomal fusions. In a large cohort made of 31 different types of cancer, it was demonstrated that 3% out of 95% of hTERT expressing tumours presented hTERT amplifications. Therefore, hTERT might be a target for amplification during tumorigenesis, which contributes to the dysregulation of telomerase activity that usually occurs in human tumors. Increased hTERT gene copy number is associated with upregulation of hTERT expression, related to acquired drug resistance, and correlated with worse clinical outcomes in breast, skin and thyroid cancer. However, in bladder cancer, no correlation was observed between increased hTERT gene copy number and hTERT mRNA, telomerase activity, or telomere length, suggesting that hTERT gene amplification may
UB
anaa
require another companion alteration for telomerase reactivation.66
Bladder, thyroid, cutaneous melanoma, basal cell and squamous carcinoma and oligodendrogliomas are examples of cancers where TERTpMut are widespread through different stages and grades of the disease, suggesting their role as an early tumorigenic event. Additionally, not all TERTpMut tumors display telomerase activation and some premalignant lesions also displayed these genetic alterations at the hTERT promoter region. Together, these results support the fact that TERTpMut may act as early events in the oncogenic process.66
In 2013, two pivotal studies described two recurrent non-coding mutations within the hTERT promoter region in both familial and sporadic melanomas. These two mutations were located at -124 and -146 bp upstream from ATG (chr5:1,295,228 G>A and 1,295,250 G>A, C>T on opposite strand). In fact the authors demonstrated that TERTpMut acquired at the transition from benign nevus to malignant melanoma do not support telomere maintenance suggesting that TERTpMut contribute to tumorigenesis in two distinct ways. Initially, TERTpMut do not prevent telomere shortening but act "healing" the shortest telomeres and later telomeres are critically short leading to genomic instability and telomerase reactivation. Whether coincidental or reasonable, recurrent hTERT mutations seem to occur in the unmethylated region, which supports the hypothesis stating ETS family factors binding to these sites activate hTERT expression.66
However, there are other cancers that do not harbor TERTpMut (testicular germ cell tumors; breast cancer, colorectal carcinoma, prostate cancer) but have telomerase activation. These observations suggest that in hTERT dependent tumors without TERTpMut, other mechanisms responsible for telomerase activation might be at play, as a hypermethylation of promoter repressive region.66
Also, TERTpMut are not only prognostic factors for poor clinical outcomes, but also predictors of radiotherapy resistance. Furthermore, BRAF/NRAS mutations are associated with decreased disease-free and melanoma-specific survival. In liver disease, TERTpMut are present in pre-malignant nodules and predict high risk for advanced disease and reduced disease-free and overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Thyroid cancer patients with TERTpMut are associated with clinically aggressive and recurrent disease, with lower disease-free and overall survival when combined with BRAF mutations. TERTpMut are a moderately prevalent genetic event in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) associated with patient age, gender and distant metastasis. These studies emphasize the hypothetical existence of a companion mechanism, necessary not only for telomerase activation but also to maintain the selfrenewal capacity allowing cancer disease progression in TERTpMut patients.66
Additionally, TERT has been described to have influence in several other molecules and pathways,
East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 39 which modify responses to inflammation, cell death, apoptosis and DNA damage responses, EMT and oncogenesis. TERT binds to c-MYC and recruits the complex to heparanase promoter to upregulate heparanase expression promoting invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer cells; furthermore, TERT-activated Wnt/p-Catenin signalling promotes c-MYC expression, which could in turn activate TERT transcription and expression in a positive feedback loop; (iii) finally, it has been shown that TERT regulation of ITGB1 in the MDM2 -FOXO3 a- ITGB pathway is able to promote gastric cancer invasion.55
Young and coworkers suggested two epigenetics mechanisms for the maintenance of a young phenotype in normal human fibroblasts with TERT re-expression. The first was the freezing of the epigenomic state of young proliferating cells by the stabilisation of DNA methylation; the second, the maintenance of low levels of the cell cycle inhibitor p21, mediated at least partially by DNMTl's transcriptional repressor activity. In human cervical cancer cell lines, p27/kip1, a tumour suppressor protein, can inhibit TERT mRNA expression and telomerase activity through post-transcriptional upregulation by interferon-c (IFNc)/IRF1 signalling. This suggests that p27 may have the function of tumour suppressor by inhibiting TERT expression. It was also described that TERT overexpression upregulated the expression and transcriptional activity of a key cell cycle regulator, cyclin D1, in human prostate epithelial cell lines. This means that TERT could have a role in the modulation of cyclin D1 expression. TERT is capable of activating the transcription of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in WI-38 and HeLa cells, this activation being independent of telomerase activity and telomere maintenance. Suppression of TERT expression abrogates the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks. Loss of TERT does not alter short-term telomere integrity but instead affects the overall configuration of chromatin. Cells lacking TERT exhibit increased radiosensitivity, diminished capacity for DNA repair, fragmented chromosomes, demonstrating that loss of TERT impairs the DNA damage response.55 HIF-1, upregulates hTERT expression in hypoxic events. Ahmed and coworkers described that in a mild oxidative stress background, telomerase did not prevent telomere shortening under hyperoxia as it translocated gradually from the nucleus to mitochondria. TERT mitochondrial localisation reduced mtDNA damage levels under oxidative stress and improved mitochondrial function, with lower levels of ROS and with enhanced mitochondrial membrane potential. Haendeler and coworkers also reported TERT's protective role in mitochondria in an oxidative stress background. TERT binds to ND1 and ND2 genes, protecting against mtDNA damage, reducing mitochondrial ROS, and increasing energy metabolism and conferring higher protection from apoptosis.55
TERT can be targeted to the mitochondria by an N-terminal leader sequence, and mitochondrial extracts from seven different human cell lines show telomerase activity. The cellular effects of mitochondrial
telomerase are controversial. Some authors argue that mitochondrial telomerase increases hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-mediated mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) damage. Ectopic TERT expression in human cells correlates with increase in mtDNA damage after H2O2 treatment. The same group later demonstrated that this increase in mtDNA damage after H2O2 exposure is dependent on the presence of TERT itself. Further experiments using a dominant negative TERT mutant show that telomerase must be catalytically active to mediate the increase in mtDNA damage. Mutations in the N-terminal mitochondrial leader sequence of TERT cause a complete loss of mitochondrial targeting without affecting catalytic activity. Cells carrying this mutated TERT not only have significantly reduced levels of mtDNA damage after H2O2 treatment, but strikingly also do not show any loss of viability or cell growth. Thus, the authors proposed that localisation of TERT to the mitochondria renders cells more susceptible to oxidative stress-induced mtDNA damage and subsequent cell death. Nuclear targeted TERT, in the absence of mitochondrial localisation, is associated with diminished mtDNA damage, increased cell survival and protection against cellular senescence.55
The expression of stem cell markers CD117, Oct4, and Sox2 was significantly higher in TELpos cells than in TELneg cells, the latter were not able to form spheres and had a much lower tumorigenic potential as only one in eight injected mice showed a tumor in contrast to seven out of eight mice which received TELpos cells. In addition, the TELpos cells displayed multipotency, as cells isolated from the tumors of mice injected with TELpos cells acquired both phenotypes, TELpos and TELneg. But most interestingly, it was shown that telomerase inhibition seems to be a promising strategy for stem cell targeted therapy in osteosarcoma: hTERT can modulate classical cancer pathways including NF-kB, TGF-p/Smad, and Wnt signaling that all contribute to the metastatic potential and stem cell phenotype of cancer cells.65
PKD1 (Protein Kinase D1) in skin and oral pathology
Protein kinase D1 (PKD1), a ubiquitous serine/threonine kinase, was originally described as a novel ^ isoform of the protein kinase C (PKC) family, as it shares two cysteine-rich domains (C1a and C1b) that bind phorbol esters and diacylglycerol as in the PKC family. Unlike other members of the PKC family, PKD1 also has a unique pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, differentiating them from other members of the PKC family, and the catalytic domain of PKD1 is most closely related to calcium calmodulin-dependent kinases (CaMK).67 68 69
Protein Kinase D1 (PKD1), has been implicated in numerous cellular functions, including cell survival, proliferation, differentiation, migration, cell-cell adhesion and epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT). PKD1 has been reported to be downregulated in advanced prostate, breast and gastric cancers, shown to play a role in tumorigenesis and metastasis, and upregulated in BCCs (basocellular carcinoma) and pancreatic cancer. Embryonic deletion of PKD1 in
mice is lethal, suggesting PKD1 plays a crucial role in development, which can not be replaced by other PKD family members, PKD2 and PKD3.67 68 69
Analysis of BCC (basal cell carcinoma) lesions of Ristich et al. showed increased expression of PKD1 when compared with normal epidermis, but not in SCC lesions (squamous cell carcinoma). So as the authors wrote, the question remain: are the enhanced PKD1 levels in BCCs are simply a marker of their basal origin or does this elevated PKD1 contributes to the pathogenesis of BCCs.70 Thus, another question is curently adequate, lack of PKD1 expression in SCCs despite increase expression of EGFR, is a consequence of its spinous layer origin, or is a consequense of PKD1 gene (PRKD1) mutation(s) (silencing, methylation).11 An analysis of 530 HNSCC tumors from the TCGA via cBioPortal demonstrated low levels of DNA methylation on PRKD1 gene. Further analysis indicated 13% cases (67 out of 530 cases) of PKD1 had loss of heterozygosity (LOH), while only three cases (< 1%) of PKD1 showed homozygous deletion. Thus, a combination of genetic and epigenetic alterations contributed to the downregulation of PKD1 expression in HNSCC.71
Using only immunohistochemical analysis authors showed that expression of PKD1 in normal epidermis was primarily restricted to the stratum basalis, the proliferative compartment of the epidermis, supporting the concept that PKD1 promotes proliferation of normal keratinocytes and that this kinase is probably connected with hyperproliferative disorders of the skin (increased expression of PKD1 was detected also in involved psoriatic lesions).70 According Ryvkin V et al. contrary to mouse keratinocytes (KCs), PKD1 is undetectable in human keratinocytes.72 There is no data for the expression of the kinase in other skin or oral (head and neck) PMDs.
Our study, using normal human cultured keratinocytes, which resembles basal epidermal keratinocytes, showed that PKD1 is presented in these cells in very low protein and mRNA levels, detectable only using p-PKD1 Ser744/748 (Ser738/Ser742 in human) antibody after short term PMA treatment (known activator of classical and novel PKCs and PKDs) and Quantitative Real-Time PCR. The antibody of Cell Signaling is with species reactivity for human, mouse, rat, monkey (from the datasheet of producer). Knockdown of PKD1 in normal human keratinocytes, using siRNA for PKD1, resulted in altered cell phenotype-enlarged cells, inhibition of keratinocytes proliferation (decreased expression of PCNA-proliferative marker) and promotion of cells differentiation (increased expression of K10 and involucrin).73 Furthermore, using antisense oligonucleatide for PKD1 we show that keratinocytes proliferation was inhibited with more than 70%, which was connected with increased phosphorylation/activity of ERK1/2 (Extracellular signal Regulated Kinase 1/2) (PKD1 inhibited ERK1/2
phosphorylation/activity)(our unpublished results). Similar results were obtained using antisense oligonucleotides for PKCa and PKCe - inhibited
proliferation mesuread by decrease of [3H] Thymidine incorporation and increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation/activity. The two PKC isoforms were proved to activate PKD1 in plethora of cell cultures, which suppose that EGF stimulates proliferation in NHEK (normal human epidermal keratinocytes) in a PKC-PKD1-ERK1/2 dependent mode.74 EGF is the main growth factor secreted from keratinocytes in the model of human autonomous proliferated keratinocytes. Using the ERK1/2 inhibitor PD98059 and the two PKC inhibitors Go6976 and Go6983, with different substrate specificity, Praskova et al. showed that EGF stimulates keratinocytes proliferation in PKC-ERK1/2 dependent mode. The obtained results are similar to those received with antisense oligonucleotides for PKC isoforms in normal keratinocytes.75 PKD1 (PKCp), PKCa and PKCe failed to influence the phosphorylation and binding activity of c-Myc (our unpublished results). The phosphorylation and binding activity of the transcriptional factor was diminished by knockdown of CaMKII5, using also antisence oligonucleotide, which inhibited keratinocytes proliferation and opposingly decrease ERK1/2 phosphorylation/activity and c-Myc binding activity.76 Similar resuts were obtained from Praskova et al. using also unspecific CaMKinase inhibitor KN-62.77 The degree of inhibition of proliferation, ERK1/2 phosphorylation/activity and c-Myc binding activity were higher in KN-62 treated cells, which suppose expression of other CaMKinase isoforms in NHEK.76,77 In contrast in hTERT keratinocytes, obtained from normal human epidermal keratinocytes infected with amphotropic retroviral vectors encoding hTERT (catalytic subunit of telomerase), also called N/Tert-1 or N-hTERT keratinocytes, the expression of PKD1 was increased near 9-fold (mRNA)73 and knockdown of the kinase, using siRNA, resulted in effective decrease of protein kinase levels, inhibition of ERK1/2 expression and activity, as well as EGFR expression and activity 48 h after transfection, and according our previous results decreased mRNA expression of K10 and involucrin 72 hours after transfection (inhibition of their differentiation).78,79 Therefore, increased expression of PKD1 in hTert keratinocytes, opposed to normal human keratinocytes, possess prodifferentiation function, which can beat least partly result of 9 fold increased PKD1 expression (our result), leading to different substrates affinity and binding, hence different function or this turn of function could be a result of p16INK4a mutations.73,78,79 In postconfluent normal keratinocytes ERK1/2 expression is increased, which is most probably connected with initiation of differentiation ot inhibition of hTert expression.74,49 Most of the authors supposed that ERK1/2 functions to mediate pro-proliferative and pro-survival pathways from many different stimulus, inscluding growth factors and cell adhesion molecules. Second, differentiation-positive signals are associated with redused ERK1/2 activity. Agents which promoted differentiation and apooptosis signals through p38 MAPK-dependent mechanisms. p38a and p385 are the main p38 MAPK isoforms, mediating activation of
gene expression, although p38a, p, and - 5 (but not -y) are expressed in keratinocytes.80
Sustain ERK1/2 activity simultaneously with increased expression of K10 and involucrin are characteristics of differentiating keratinocytes49, but it remains quationary increased expression of EGFR. If we consider increased expression of telomerase and loss of p16INK4a function, this cell line could be considered as a model of a premalignant (PMD) cell line, which are characterisised with up-regulated EGFR and/or its ligands and ERK1/2. PKD1 regulate in opposing manner differentiation in normal keratinocytes and hTert keratinocytes, in both of which increased proliferative cell potential as a result of over expression od EGFR and ERK1/2 (chronical inflammation, increased hert expression), are limited at least in part by PKD1 possesing prodifferentiation activity - expression of early markers of differentiation - K10 and involoucrin. It is good to mention according us ERK1/2 in human keratinocytes participates not only in the regulation of proliferation, but also in the control of their differentiation, similarly to PC12 cells, although only several papers report differentiation connected ERK1/2 activity in keratinocytes.49,81,74 Recent findings suggested that the inhibition of the p38 MAPK pathway, ERK1/2 pathway and JNK pathway down-regulated filaggrin (differentiation marker) in NHEKs.82 PKD1 is with near nine fold higher levels of mRNA expression in hTert keratinocytes in comparision with normal keratinocytes, which could altered the affinity to substrates, which are not targeted by the kinase in their normal extremely low levels in normal human keratinocytes, undetectable by Rykin et al.73,70,72 or overactivation of its ordinary substrates (ERK1/2). Bertrand-Vallery V et al. reported that repeated exposures to sublethal doses of UVB induce an alternative differentiation state rather than premature senescence in N-hTERT (hTERT) and in cultivated human keratinocytes.83 For the first time we detected that ERK1/2, which are thought to be constitutive expressed kinases in cells are inducible enzymes upregulated, together with EGFR, from PKD1 in hTert keratinocytes.79
hTERT keratinocytes have been obtained from normal human epidermal keratinocytes, which were infected with amphotropic retroviral vectors encoding hTERT, catalytic subunit of telomerase, catalytic subunit-hTERT is thought to be activity-limiting component of the telomerase holoenzyme. hTERT is expressed only in germ cells, stem cells of renewal tissues and in cancer cells (including BCC and SCC). Telomerase activity is not detected in most somatic tissues (the proliferative basal layer of epidermis expresses telomerase, but anchorage-deprived cells underwent rapid loss of telomerase activity). In NHEK and in SCC4 cell line attachment loss was associated with decrease hTERT and increased ERK1 activity, G1 to S phase progression, subsequent G2 cell cycle arrest and differentiation. Adhesion to collagen via specific integrin subunits inhibited ERK1 activity and telomerase repression.49 Erk1/2 knockdown in
keratinocytes was not associated with decreased cyclin D1 expression, in contrast to fibroblasts.84
Dickson et al. showed that expression of hTERT alone permits keratinocytes to escape complete growth and to enter a phase of slow growth of variable length from which rapidly dividing immortal variants emerge.47 The hTert(+) cells have a normal karyotype and the cells have undergone more than 80 population doublings (PDs) after hTert retroviral transduction while control cells exhibit senescence-associated proliferation arrest after 8 PDs.47,85 Such immortalized cell typically have identifiable defects in p16INK4a expression but retain functional p53. The mechanism that triggers p16INK4a accumulation appears to sense the senescence state of keratinocytes, but preventing telomerase erosion does not avoid its activation. Loss of this mechanism, whether by p16INK4a gene deletion, mutation, or altered regulation of expression, together with telomere stabilization effected by hTERT expression is necessary to enable keratinocytes to become immortalized. It was supposed that immortalization of the keratinocytes by forced expression of telomerase and subsequent spontaneous events leading to loss of this p16INK4a-dependent mechanism (first mutation-see below) generally does not disrupt either other normal growth control mechanisms or affects the ability of the cells to form a differentiated epithelium. hTERT keratinocytes continued to express the differentiation-related markers involucrin and K10 in suprabasal cells of stratified colonies and form differentiating epidermis in organotypic culture. They form more robust epithelium with a denser and more columnar basal cell layer and more layers of spinous cells than that formed by mildlife-span normal keratinocytes.47 This epithelium resembles pathohistological changes observed in psoriatic lesions. In psoriatic epidermis is detected mutations of CARD14, encoding a nuclear factor of kappa light chain enhancer in B cells (NF-kB) (epidermal regulator of NF-kB), within skin epidermis and increased expression and activity of hTERT, EGFR, STAT3, PKD1, NF-kB, and other kinases.86,56,13,56,70,86
Previously we supposed a model in which transient activation followed by a sustained low basal activity of ERK1/2 is connected with keratinocytes proliferation and sustained high activity (expression) of ERK1/2 is connected with promotion of their differentiation.79,74,49 Corelation between the duration and strenght of ERK1/2 phosphorylation/activation and the consequent physiological cells events was previously detected in rat PC12 pheochromocytome cells, fibroblasts, macrophages and T-limphocytes.87,88,89 Factors such as cell-surface receptor density, expression of scaffolding proteins, the surrounding extracellular matrix, and the interplay between kinases and phosphatases modulate the strength and duration of ERK signaling. Furthermore, the spatial distribution and temporal qualities of ERK can markedly alter the qualitative and quantitative features of downstream signaling to immediate early genes (IEG) and the expression of IEG-encoded protein
products. As a result, IEG products provide a molecular interpretation of ERK dynamics, enabling the cell to program an appropriate biological response.89,184
Thus, lower levels of ERK / expression in hTERT keratinocytes knockdowned for PKD1 together with lack of expression of K10 and involucrin is a phenotype characteristic for basal proliferating keratinocytes, suggesting that PKD1 in hTERT keratinocytes possess prodifferentiation role.78,79 Additional study have to prove or reject the hypotesis, that PKD1 in hTERT keratinocytes will inhibit their proliferation. The results suppose different function of PKD1 in normal human and hTERT keratinocytes, which suppose that the kinase (and/or other kinases) could possess different role in PMDs (see below). The alteration in the function of the kinase is a consequence only of the forced expression of hTERT, followed by spontaneous events leading to loss of this p16INK4a-dependent mechanism, and increase in PKD1 expression.78,73,47 Other mutations are not detected. p16 is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that inhibits pRb phosphorylation and blocks cell cycle progression at the G1 to S checkpoint (see below). Loss of p16 expression by deletion, mutation, or hypermethylation is common in HNSCC.90 Previously it was detected that expression of total and nuclear EGFR was higher in p16-negative tumors compared to p16-positive tumors (HPV positive tumours mostly).91 Doorslaer and Burk showed that oncogenic types papilloma virus (HPV) specifically activate the hTERT promoter, while non-oncogenic types do not.92 However, as it was mentioned above increased forced expression of hTERT leads to spontaneous loss of p16INK4a-dependent mechanism.47 Significant correlation was found between telomerase activity and mRNA expression of EGFR in 15 cases, including non-neoplastic salivary glands and human salivary gland carcinomas.37
Surprisingly for us, the expression of EGFR in hTret keratinocytes was also down-regulated from PKD1 silencing.79 In normal skin, the EGF-R is most strongly, although not exclusively, expressed in the basal layer of the epidermis, consistent with the involvement of the EGF-R in epidermal growth control. EGFR is known to be an important regulator of multiple epidermal functions, including cell cycle progression, differentiation, cell movement and cellular survival.13 Using microarray analysis of a confluent cell density-induced model of keratinocyte differentiation, the authors identified 2,676 genes that are regulated by epidermal growth factor (EGF), a ligand of the EGFR. The authors further discovered, and separately confirmed by functional assays, that EGFR activation abrogates all of the known essential processes of keratinocyte differentiation by 1) decreasing the expression of lipid matrix biosynthetic enzymes, 2) regulating numerous genes forming the cornified envelope, and 3) suppressing the expression of tight junction proteins.93 Several observations indicate that abnormalities (increase) in the expression of the EGF-R and/or its ligands EGF, TGF-a and AR are common
UB
ansa
features of hyperproliferative premalignant deases and neoplastic epithelia.13
Additionally, TERT has been described to have influence in several other molecules and pathways, which modify responses to inflammation, cell death, apoptosis and DNA damage responses, EMT, invasiveness (metastasis formation) and stemness. For instance, in a comparison between normal and TERT immortalised fibroblasts using a cDNA microarray, Lindvall and coworkers verified that TERT immortalised cells had 172 differentially expressed genes; one of them is epiregulin, a potent growth factor associated with cancer. The results suggest that both activation of telomerase and subsequent induction of epiregulin are required for a sustained cell proliferation.54,65
Additionally, ectopic expression of telomerase in HMECs leads to an increased ability to proliferate. This expression results in a diminished requirement for exogenous mitogens and correlates with telomerase-dependent induction of genes that promote cell growth. Inhibition of one of these genes, for instance of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), reverses the enhanced proliferation caused by telomerase.54 However in hTtert keratinocytes PKD1 up-regulates EGFR expression, probably as consequence of p16INK4a mutations detected in these cells.
In oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) an hTERT knockdown leads to reduction in MMP2 and MMP9 expression levels, thereby inhibiting invasiveness. Ding et al. demonstrated that hTERT, independent from its catalytic activity, is able to increase the cells' invasive potential by inducing MMP9 expression in an NFKB-dependent manner in several non-telomerase expressing cell lines such as osteosarcoma U2OS and the cervical carcinoma cell line HeLa. In cell lines with endogenous telomerase expression (293T and MCF7), a genetic knockdown of hTERT resulted in decreased MMP9 levels and a lower invasive potential. Interestingly, Ponnala et al. reported that silencing of MMP9 leads to a reduction in hTERT expression and telomerase activity via p1 integrin-dependent FAK signaling and deregulation of Myc/MAX/MAD ratios in GBM cells. From these findings, it was concluded that loss of telomerase activity due to MMP9 silencing leads to increased DNA damage that causes cells into a senescence stage or, after further replication, into apoptosis. Since it is established that MMP9 is overexpressed in tumor cells of several cancers compared to resident cells and normal tissue, a therapeutic reduction in MMP9 could be a potential approach for selective targeting of hTERT in cancer cells but not in resident cells. hTERT directly affects the levels of p65, the subunit of the NF-kB transcription factor, in the cytoplasm and the nucleus of tumor cells. This example demonstrates that hTERT functions in tumor cells are beyond the effect of replicative immortality.65
Although BCC are with basal origin, EGFR is expressed at a significantly higher level in SCC than in BCC.36 Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the skin is a highly compact, non-metastatic epithelial tumour type
East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 43 that may arise from the aberrant propagation of epidermal or progenitor stem cell (SC) populations. Increased expression of GLI1 is a common feature of BCC and is linked to the induction of epidermal SC markers in immortalized N/Tert-1 keratinocytes. GLI1 over-expression is linked to additional SC characteristics in N/Tert-1 cells including reduced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression and compact colony formation that is associated with repressed extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activity. ERK activity was predominantly negative in 13/14 BCCs (superficial/nodular).40 However, N/Tert-1 keratinocytes possess p16INK4a mutation, which is not observed in BCC11, hence this cell line is not the most suitable for studing molecular alterations in BCC. Additionally, transgenic mice overexpressing Sonic hedgehog (Shh) or a mutated variant of Smoothened (SMOH) show epidermal proliferations in late embryonic skin that partially resembles BCC. To test the hypothesis that GLI-1 is the downstream effector that drives tumorigenesis, transgenic mice were generated specifically overexpressing GLI-1 in the basal layer of epidermis and outer root sheet of hair follicles. These mice develop several types of spontaneous skin tumors, including BCC, TEs, cylindromas, and trichoblastomas. Furthermore, mutation analysis of the p53 and Ha ras genes, respectively, did not reveal mutations in their hot spot regions, exons 4-8 for p53 and codons 12, 13, and 61 for Ha ras, in any of the tumors examined. This suggests a p53- and Ha ras-independent mechanism by which GLI-1 induce these tumors in mouse skin.191 Thus, AK which acquire activating mutation(s) in HH pathway (as a second muation) will progress to BCC. AK with TP53 mutations probably has to be refered as SCC.1011 If the first mutation is in the HH pathway there is higher probability to develop Trichoepithelioma (TEs), cylindromas, and trichoblastomas and finally BCC.19144
Another fact which desert attention was that PKD1 (PKCm), and PKCa and PKCe, in fact decresed ERK1/2 activity, do not stimulate it, as it is expected according the scientific data. PKD1 phosphorylates RIN1 on the cell membrane, protein associating with Ras and 14-33 proteins (also binding partner of PKD1). Through phosphorylation of RIN1, association with 14-3-3 could be more intence, abrogating its ability to block Ras/Raf-1 interactions. Ras could dissociate and is free to be activated, hence activate Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK/RSK pathway.67,94,69,95 The data supposs stimulation of ERK1/2 pathway by the three PKC isoforms expressed in keratinocytes. Schonwasser DC et al. published data that PKC-a (and PKC-P1, not expressed in keratinocytes) induce desensitizing effect on c-Raf activation, which avoid further activation from growth factors. Probably PKD1 posses similar effect or inhibits ERK1/2 activity. This negative control could demand phosphorylation on particular PKC residues.96 The observed effect on p-ERK1/2 is additionally confermed by the results of Chiou YS et al., who detected increased PKD1 expression (and CD34 expression (stem cell marker)), leading to
decreased p-ERK1/2 levels in two steps according (DMBA)-initiated and 12-0-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-promoted skin tumorigenesis protocol in ICR mice. Interesting, the authors detected simultaneous increase in the levels of phosphorylated (activated) phorms of p-PI3K, p-JNK1/2, p-p38, increased expression of p53, p21 nad c-Myc, reversed effects from those expected from scientific data in other cell types (PKD1 inhibit the activity of PI3K, JNK1/2, p3895). This paper also proves the ability of PKD1 to activate NF-kB in mouse epidermis of induced carcinogenesis and connected increased expression of proinflammatory and proproliferative genes, including iNOS (inducible nitric oxide synthase), COX-2 (cyclooxygenase-2), ODC (ornithine decarboxylase) and VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor).97
Additional studies are necessary to confirm whether hTERT keratinocytes posses increased EGFR and ERK1/2 expession than that in normal human keratinocytes and whether stimulation of normal epidermal keratinocytes with LPS (specific binding to TLR4 to activate NF-kB98 or other chronic inflammatory mediators, will lead to increase hTERT, PKD1, NF-kB, ERK1/2 and EGFR expression. It will be interesting whether oral PMDs, possess higher expression of PKD1 and ERK1/2 expression/activity than in normal human keratinocytes vs. SCCs. Increased expression of EGFR is a common feature of plethora of PMDs (see below)13, there is also data for increased expression and activity of hTERT, NF-kB and COX-2 (see above).451
We speculate that this molecular mechanism (increased NFkB - hTert-PKD1 - NFKB-hTert) is probably connected with the progression of chronic inflammation in cancer development.99,28 It is known that increased activity of NF-kB in inflammation is connected with increased expression of hTERT.47,98,28 Thus, chronic inflammation could lead to increase expression of hTERT which consequently will lead to p16INK4a mutation (model of hTERT keratinocytes). In this regard hTERT keratinocytes as a cell line model resembles PMDs (premalignant binign deaseases), more than a tumor cell line. However increased PKD1 expression in hTERT keratinocytes, as a consequance of increased hTERT expression and/or p16INK4a mutations, is not a proproliferative signal in this cell line, rather that it is prodifferentiative.78,79 PKD1 stimulated expression of K10 and Involucrin could be connected with abundance in cytoplasms filaments seen in early hypertrophic diseases, and PKD1 stimulated expression of ERK1/2 and EGFR are closely connected with pathogenetic mechanismes of PMDs.78,79 On the other hand the molecular mechanisms regulating PKD1 expression are in skin are currently not well known. It is not known also whether PKD1 participates in inflammation process in skin95 - Fig.8, there are data for its participation in pancreatitis.100,95
A paper proving the participation of PKD1 in infalammatory process was published. Group B streptococci (GBS) are one of the leading causes of life-threatening illness in neonates. Proinflammatory
responses to GBS mediated through host innate immune receptors play a critical role in the disease manifestation. In a study Upadhyay K et al., investigated the role of protein kinase D (PKD)1 in the proinflammatory responses to GBS. They found that both live and antibiotic-killed GBS induce activation of PKD1 through a pathway that is dependent on the TLR signaling adaptor MyD88 and its downstream kinase IL-1R-associated kinase 1, but independent of TNFR-associated factor 6. Their studies using pharmacological PKD inhibitors and PKD1-knockdown macrophages revealed that PKD1 is indispensable for GBS-mediated activation of MAPKs and NF-kB and subsequent expression of proinflammatory mediators. Furthermore, systemic administration of a PKD inhibitor protects d-galactosamine-sensitized mice from shock-mediated death caused by antibiotic-killed GBS. These findings imply that PKD1 plays a critical regulatory role in GBS-induced proinflammatory reactions and sepsis, and inhibition of PKD1 activation together with antibiotic treatment in GBS-infected neonates could be an effective way to control GBS diseases.101
Chronic inflammatory mediators exert pleiotropic effects in the development of cancer. On the one hand, inflammation favors carcinogenesis, malignant transformation, tumorgrowth, invasion, and metastatic spread; on the other hand inflammation can stimulate immune effector mechanisms that might limit tumor growth.The link between cancer and inflammation depends on intrinsic and extrinsic pathways. Both pathways result in the activation of transcription factors such as NF-kB, STAT-3, and HIF-1 and in accumulation of tumorigenic factors in tumor and microenvironment.28,99
Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB) regulates the expression of various genes, several genes involved in inflammation and tumorigenesis, including those of the liver. A role for NF-kB has been implicated in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma. This transcription factor can regulate hTERT gene transcription, which expression was found to be at high levels in this type carcinoma. In a study, Huang et al. showed that LPS (specific binding to TLR4 to activate NF-kappaB) was positive for NFkB p65 mRNA expression and activation, and also up-regulated hTERT mRNA and protein expressions at 36h in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, MG-132 (inhibiting the activity of 26S proteasome and thereby preventing nuclear translocation of NF-kB) significantly inhibited activation of NF-kB and mRNA expression, and also decreased expression of hTERT at both mRNA and protein levels at 36h in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, dexamethasone blocked LPS-induced activation of NF-kB and expression of the hTERT in HepG(2) cells. These findings suggest that NF-kB may modulate hTERT mRNA level, importantly, in protein level in HepG(2) cells and dexamethasone inhibits LPS-induced hTERT via blocking NF-kB.98
NF-kB activation in inflammatory cells in response to infectious pathogens, pro-inflammatory
UB
ansa
mediators as well as necrotic cell products results in the generation of secretable factors that support growth, survival, and vascularization of pre-malignant and malignant cells. Activation of NF-kB up-regulates cell cycle mediators (cyclin D1, c-Myc), anti-apoptotic (c-FLIP, survivin, Bcl-XL) and adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, ELAM-1,VCAM-17), proteolytic enzymes (e.g.,MMP, uPA), and pro-inflammatory factors (pGHS-2 (COX-2), cytokines) that promote inflammation and tumorogenesis.28,99 Additioanally, the serine/threonine kinase protein kinase D1 (PKD1) is a stress-responsive kinase and sensor for reactive oxygen species, which can initiate cell survival through activation of NF-kB signaling.102 PKD1 activates NFkB by the phosphorylation and activation of inhibitory k kinase (IKK). This results in the degradation of inhibitory protein IkB and the release of NFkB from the inhibitory complex, followed by accumulation in the nucleus and induction of downstream target genes. PKD1 may also be involved in IKK independent mechanisms that activate the NFkB pathway within cells.67,69,95 It was recently demonstrated that KRas-induced activation of the canonical NF-kB pathway is one mechanism of how PRKD1 (gene of PKD1) expression is increased and identify the binding sites for NF-kB in the PRKD1 promoter in pancreatic cancer.103
The loss of p16 may be an early event in cancer progression, because deletion of at least one copy is quite high in some premalignant lesions. p16INK4a is a major target in carcinogenesis, rivaled in frequency only by the p53 tumor-suppressor gene.104 Alterations of p16 have been described in a wide variety of histological types of human cancers including astrocytoma, melanoma, leukemia, breast cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, malignant mesothelioma, and lung cancer. Alterations of p16 can occur through homozygous deletion, point mutation, and transcriptional suppression associated with hypermethylation in cancer cell lines and primary tumors.105 Methylation of p16INK4a was observed in 44% of 34 patients with oral leukoplakia lesions, and hypermethylation in 76% of OSCCs. These findings demonstrate that methylation is an early event in oral carcinogenesis and that its study may be useful to detect precancerous lesions.2
The p16 gene (also known as CDKN2A) encodes p16INK4A, which inhibits (inactivating) the CDK4:cyclin D and CDK6:cyclin D complexes. These complexes mediate phosphorylation of the Rb protein and allow cell cycle progression beyond the G1-S-phase checkpoint. Whereas the Rb gene is inactivated in a narrow range of tumor cells, the pattern of mutational inactivation of Rb is inversely correlated with p16 alterations, suggesting that a single defect in the p16/CDK4:cyclin D/Rb pathway is sufficient for tumorigenesis. 105
The p16 gene expresses two alternative transcripts (p16alpha and p16beta) involved in tumor suppression via the retinoblastoma (Rb) or p53 pathways. Disruption of these pathways can occur through inactivation of p16 or p53, or activating mutations of
East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 45 cyclin dependant kinase 4 gene (Cdk4). We searched for p16, Cdk4 and p53 gene mutations in 20 squamous cell carcinomas (SSCs), 1 actinic keratosis (AK), and 28 basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), using PCR-SSCP. A deletion and methylation analysis of p16 was also performed. Six different mutations (12%) were detected in exon 2 of p16 (common to p16alpha and p16beta), in five out of 21 squamous lesions (24%) (one AK and four SCCs) and one out of 28 BCCs (3.5%). These included four (66%) ultraviolet (UV)-type mutations (two tandems CC : GG to TT : AA transitions and two C : G to T : A transitions at dipyrimidic site) and two transversions. P53 mutations were present in 18 samples (37%), mostly of UV type. Of these, only two (one BCC and one AK) harboured simultaneously mutations of p16, but with no consequence on p16beta transcript. Soufir N et al. data demonstrate for the first time the presence of p16 UV induced mutations in non melanoma skin cancer, particularly in the most aggressive SCC type, and support that p16 and p53 are involved in two independent pathways in skin carcinogenesis.161
In a complementary study, it was observed that assembly of cyclin D1/D2-CDK4 complexes was impaired in primary mouse embryo fibroblast (MEF) strains taken from animals lacking the p21 gene, the p27 gene, or both. In MEFs fromp21/p27 double-null mice, nuclear import of cyclin D1 is inefficient, and overexpressed D cyclins remain predominantly cytoplasmic. The half-life of unassembled cyclin D1 is significantly reduced from 25 to l0 min.106 Mutations in bothp21 gene and thep27gene are also often observed in premalignant lesions (see below).
We can speculate that an axis of EGFR- PKD1-NFKB-hTERT in skin and oral epithelium pathology exists, and alteration in this axis is probably connected with the prograssion of chronical inflamated mucosa to precancer in skin and oral mucosa. Since increased expression of hTERT is an early event in the pathogenesis of hyperproliferative skin diseases, (hTERT is considered as a proliferative marker, rather than cancer marker46,33, its expression is increased in all PMDs.33,57,48,58,59 Additional studies are necessary to confirm whether other hyperproliferative skin conditions - pre-malignant leucoplakia, erythroplakia, oral lichen planus possesses an increased expression of PKD1 and ERK1/2, as an early consequence of increased hTERT expression. Previously it was detected that expression of total and nuclear EGFR was higher in p16-negative tumors compared to p16-positive tumors91, which will activate additionally transduction pathways lieing downstream from EGFR. Increase EGFR expression or its ligands EGF, TGF-alpha or AR were detected in all precancer oral lesions (PMDs)13, and the EGFR copy number is thought to be a useful biomolecular marker to differentiate PMODs from OSCC (see bolow).
Probably second mutations (first in inhibitors of the cell cycle p16, p21, p27, Cyclin D1(amplification) [2] in Kras, p53, EGFR, or hTERT) will reverse benign phenotype of late precancer lesions (PMDs) into benign cancer lesion. Third mutation in the PKD1 gene
46 East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 (PRKD1), or in E-cadherin gene will increase malignant potential of cancer, activating EMTransition, invasion and metastasis, e.g. will lead to aggressive phenotype. According Ristich VL et al. SCCs did not showed increased expression of PKD170, although tumour possess increase expression of EGFR, leading to activation of downstream signaling pathways. Thus, down-regulation of PRKD1 (gene of PKD1) is a very probable reason for conversion of PMDs in SCCs. An analysis of 530 HNSCC tumors from the TCGA via cBioPortal demonstrated low levels of DNA methylation on PRKD1 gene. Further analysis indicated 13% cases (67 out of 530 cases) of PKD1 had loss of heterozygosity (LOH), while only three cases (< 1%) of PKD1 showed homozygous deletion. Thus, a combination of genetic and epigenetic alterations contributed to the downregulation of PKD1 expression.71
PKD1 is activated during oxidative stress through a mechanism that requires nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (c-Abl and Src) and PKC5 (and probably not other PKCs). c-Abl-dependent PKD1 phosphorylation at Tyr463 (in the PH domain) releases intramolecular autoinhibition, and Srcdependent PKD1 phosphorylation at Tyr95 creates a docking site for the C2 domain of PKC5; PKC5 then phosphorylates the PKD1 activation loop at Ser738/ Ser742. A redox-dependent pathway involving Src and c-Abl also promotes PKD1- PH domain phosphorylation at Tyr432 and Tyr502, but the significance of these modifications is uncertain, because they do not lead to gross changes in PKD1 activity. There is evidence that the reactive oxygen species-activated PKD1 enzyme is localized (although not necessarily restricted) to mitochondria and that it recruits a nuclear factor kB (NFkB) pathway that induces expression of antioxidant/antiapoptotic genes (such as manganese superoxide dismutase) and promotes cell survival. It is noteworthy that the canonical growth factor-dependent PKD1-signaling pathway does not activate NFkB or induce manganese superoxide dismutase (mnSOD), emphasizing that the signaling repertoire and cellular actions of PKD1 can be highly contextual.119
Similar mechanism of activation mediated by a Src family kinase cascade was observed by Bolag after UVB exposure and UVB-elicited oxidative stress.144 Although, according to authors, UVB increases tyrosine phosphorylation of PKD by Src as well as western analysis using an antibody recognizing phosphotyrosine463 (tyrosine residue phosphorylated by Abl, not by Src-authors' remark). This result is also consistent with the ability of the tyr463phe PKD mutant to act in a dominant negative manner to exacerbate UVB's apoptotic effect (and prevent PKD's ability to promote survival).143 A number of studies have shown that PKD1 opposes the apoptotic effects of oxidative stress (or UVB exposure) in a variety of cells and allow survival of UV-damaged cells. This ability of PKD1 to promote survival would be beneficial in preventing excessive apoptosis with low levels of UVB exposure, causing minimal DNA damage that can be repaired. However, if PKD1 allows survival of cells that have
UB
BtSgSB
suffered irreparable UV-induced DNA damage, these keratinocytes with DNA mutations could continue to proliferate and form skin tumors. Thus, either a pro-proliferative or pro-survival mechanism could provide a means by which PKD1 could contribute to epidermal tumorigenesis.144,67 Similar mode of PKD1 activation was observed from Chiou et al. in mouse model of papillomas97 (probably as a result of PKCs depletion from TPA148, there is no data in human papillomas), and was suppose from us in BCC.95,44,148
PKC 5 is activated in keratinocytes exposed to UV radiation by caspase-3-mediated cleavage in the hinge domain to generate a constitutively active catalytic fragment, called PKM.187 The cleavage and activation of PKC5 is involved in UV-induced apoptosis, an important protective mechanism which helps protect the epidermis from cancer by eliminating potentially malignant keratinocytes. Since PKC5 is involved in eliminating UV-damaged keratinocytes via apoptosis, and is down-regulated or inactivated in keratinocytes with activated ras genes, PKC5 is a potential tumor suppressor for skin cancer.172,185 p385 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) is a downstream carrier of the PKC5-dependent death signal in epidermal keratinocytes. Concurrent p385 activation and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) inactivation are required for apoptosis. H2O2, a known inducer of keratinocyte apoptosis, promotes identical PKC5 and p385-ERK1/2 activity changes, leading to similar morphological alterations.186 Other alterations after UV radiation in skin were recently summarized by us in.148
Proves for the participations of PKD1 in inflammatory and tumour promoting events, in accordance with our results and hypothesis, were published Chiou YS et al..97 Topical application of TPA (A) or DMBA (B) over 12 h, according (DMBA)-initiated and 12-0-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-promoted skin tumorigenesis in ICR mice, greatly increased the protein levels of PKD1 and CD34 (stem cell marker), decreased ERK1/2, increased c-Myc, Cyclin B1/CDK1 complexes and Cdc25A. Pretreatment with AcEGCG (peracetylated EGCG) lead to the activation of ERK, the degradation of Cdc25A and the inhibition of cyclin B1/CDK1 complex assembly; these effects cause G2/M phase arrest and block mitotic progression. Pretreatment with AcEGCG at a dose of 1 or 5 ^M resulted also in a decrease in the levels of phosphorylated JNK1/2, p38 and PI3K/ Akt compared with the levels in DMBA/TPA-mediated tumors (decreased p-ERK1/2 increased, p-PI3K, p-JNK1/2, p-p38). The authors also observed that the DMBA/TPA stimulation of NF-kB, C/EBPs and CREB-DNA-binding activity was attenuated by pretreatment with AcEGCG in a dose-dependent manner, which transcribe proinflammatory and proproliferative genes, including iNOS (inducible nitric oxide synthase), COX-2 (cyclooxygenase-2), ODC (ornithine decarboxylase) and VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor). Overall, the authors speculated that AcEGCG exerts antiproliferative and/or antiinflammatory effects in CD34+ skin stem cells and
skin tumors and that the suppression of PKD1 activity and its downstream signaling pathways may be involved in the prevention of skin carcinogenesis.97
In this study, Chiou YS et al. also analyzed CD34 and PKD1 expression levels in human keratinocytes (HaCaT) and human epithelial carcinoma cells (A431) and found that A431 cells had an ~4-fold induction of CD34 and PKD1 expression compared with HaCaT cells. In addition, CD34 and PKD1 upregulation correlated with a fast proliferative potential. Their results strongly suggest that the overexpression and activation of PKD1 in CD34+ skin stem cells and skin tumors are potential targets for the treatment of skin carcinogenesis.97 Additionally , when subjected to two-stage chemical skin carcinogenesis protocol, PKD1-deficient mice were resistant to papilloma formation when compared to control littermates.107 Ristich et al. do not detect PKD1 in SCC, and probably down-regulation of its expression could be accepted as a critical point in progression of benigh tumours to SCC70 (lack of its expression as a cancer marker), two-stage carcinogenesis protocol leads to development of papillomas and consequently SCC.
The Chiou YS et al. article is interesting with that that it is the only paper detecting PKD1 effects in mouse keratinocytes on different key kinases. Increased PKD1 levels, after two step carcinogenetic protocol, resulted in decreased p-ERK1/2, and increased p-PI3K, p-JNK1/2, p-p38. The decreased in p-ERK1/2, decreased activity of ERK1/2 is in accordance with our results, which also showed that PKD1 inhibited phosphoryation of ERK1/2 in human keratinocytes75,74 (and unpublished results with PKD1 antisense oligonucleotide) leading to stimulation of keratinocytes proliferation, contrarily to expected stimulation of ERK1/2 according scientific data. According the same sources increased PKD1 levels has to inhibite phosphorylation (activity) of PI3K, JNK1/2 and p38 in other cell types (PKD1- Substrates and function), but Chiou YS et al. detected the reversed effects. The authors also proved NF-kB activation by increased PKD1 levels in mouse keratinocytes in the process of tumour promotion.97
In recent report Rashel M et al. generated mice with targeted deletion of PKD1 in epidermis to evaluate the significance of PKD1 in normal and hyperplastic conditions, as mentioned above. In addition, the hyperplastic and inflammatory responses to topical phorbol ester were significantly suppressed suggesting involvement of PKD1 in tumor promotion (and inflammation). Consistently, when subjected to two-stage chemical skin carcinogenesis protocol, PKD1-deficient mice were resistant to papilloma formation when compared to control littermates.107 However, similarly to PKCe over-expression this could promotes the formation of highly metastatic squamous cell carcinomas (papilloma-independent carcinomas -SCC).108 109 110 PKCe can phosphorylate PKD1 in the activation loop Ser738/Ser742 in human, resulting in its activation95, although the kinase influences many other cell processes.111
Moreover, as it was mentioned above, mTOR major up-stream and down-stream regulator gene expression was assessed in skin biopsies from 15 patients affected by psoriasis, 5 patients with allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), 5 patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and 3 patients with EGFR-inhibitor-induced skin rash. All analyzed skin diseases showed an increase of mTOR gene expression whereas mTOR up-stream negative regulators were reduced or not enhanced in all of them. mTOR was strongly expressed in all epidermal layers of lesional and non-lesional psoriatic skin. Conversely, pro-inflammatory conditions, in vitro, were not able to increase mTOR levels, except for UVB. Similarly, anti-TNF-a therapy was not able to reduce mTOR gene expression in patients with psoriasis. Balato A et al. study provides evidence that mTOR is involved in cutaneous inflammatory process, but through a signalling not directly dependent from Thl-Th17 pathway.112, 95 Activation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is a central event in many types of cancer113 and represents a promising target for new treatment strategies.114,115,44
PI3Ks are activated by RTKs, such as EGFR, and the catalytic subunit phosphorylates phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to form phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP3). Interaction of PIP3 with the PH (Pleckstrin Homology) domain of AKT and PDK1 results in a conformational change causing phosphorylation of AKT/PKB by PDK1 and mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2). This activates AKT that then phosphorylates proteins involved in cell growth and survival. mTOR is a protein kinase that acts downstream of PI3K and AKT and plays an important role in cell growth, survival and protein synthesis regulation. There are two mTOR complexes: mTORC1 activates ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (p70S6K, which directs the translation of cell cycle regulatory proteins such as Cyclin D1 and myc116, TNF-a/mTOR/S6K1 patwhay activates Gli1117, and inactivates eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), resulting in protein translation and cell growth, whereas mTORC2 together with PDK1 phosphorylates and activates AKT.118 PKD1 phosphorylate the p85 regulatory subunit of PI3K (which is inhibited —do not bind RTKs—when it is phosphorylated in the SH2 domen by PKD1.119 Ras can also activate the PI3K signalling cascade118,95 and RalGDS (Ras-like guanine nucleotide-dissociation stimulator).120,95
mTOR gene expression was significantly increased in psoriasis, allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), atopic dermatitis (AD) as well as in EGFR inhibitor induced cutaneous rash, compared to healthy skin. Psoriasis mTOR expression was also enhanced in non-lesional skin of psoriatic patients but only weakly expressed in the epidermis from healthy individuals. Conversely, mTOR gene expression resulted decreased in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) isolated from psoriatic subjects when compared to healthy controls. To confirm the effective enhancement of mTOR in these skin inflammatory diseases Balato A et
al. also investigated the expression of mRNA levels of key negative upstream regulators ofmTOR such as TSC 1 and TSC2. TSC I and TSC2 gene expression were not enhanced in psoriasis and ACD and significantly reduced in AD compared to healthy skin; particularly, as regards EGFR inhibitor induced cutaneous rash, TSC1 levels were not significantly increased, whereas TSC2 gene expression was reduced. The results found by investigating TSC1 and TSC2 expression suggest that the augmentation of mTOR in psoriasis, AD as well as ACD could be functionally active because not inhibited by its major negative upstream regulators. Since their experiments showed that mTOR may be involved in skin inflammation they also investigated gene expression of its major downstream effectors such as 4EBPl and S6Kl, which are known as the best output of mTORC1. Neither 4EBPI nor S6KI were significantly augmented in psoriasis, AD, ACD or EGFR inhibitor induced cutaneous rash suggesting that mTOR pathways involved in skin inflammation are different from those traditional and well-known such as those implicated in protein and lipid synthesis.3 Additionally, Balato A et al. in vivo and in vitro experiments showed lack of a significant relationship between mTOR, TNF-a and IL-l7A, supporting the hypothesis of alternative signalling pathways for mTOR activation in skin inflammation. Taken together, their results suggested that mTOR is involved in cutaneous inflammatory process, but through a signalling not directly dependent from Th1-Th17 pathway.3,95
A recent research by Iversen et al. using quantitative RT-PCR (reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction), determined the mRNA expression of the seven of 14-3-3 isoforms (P, y, e, Z, n, c and t) in involved and uninvolved skin from psoriasis, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), atopic dermatitis and nickel induced allergic contact dermatitis. 14-3-3c mRNA expression was increased in psoriasis and contact dermatitis, but not in BCC. In atopic dermatitis no significant difference between involved and uninvolved skin was found. Increased 14-3-3t mRNA levels were detected in involved skin from patients with psoriasis, contact dermatitis and BCC. Only 14-3-3t expression (protein) was significantly increased in involved psoriatic skin compared with uninvolved skin.121 The docking interaction between 14-3-3t and PKD1 actually decreases PKD1 catalytic activity, probably through nuclear export of activated PKD1.119,95 Immunofluorescence staining with 14-3-3t and 14-3-3c (stratifin) specific antibodies showed localization of both isoforms to the cytoplasm of the keratinocytes in the various skin sections.121 The c isoform is of particular interest because it is specifically expressed in epithelial cells, and its expression is frequently lost during breast and prostate cancer progression. The received data strongly suggest that S11 phosphorylation of Snail is critical for binding to 14-3-3c and PKD1 is able to phosphorylate S11 in vivo1195, although there is no data in keratinocytes or in epithelial cancer cell lines. Snail protein is also pulled down with 14-3-3n independent of PKD1.122, 95-Fig- 4
Increased expression of PKD1 was detected in ADM (Acinar-to-ductal metaplasia) and in PanIN (pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia) lesions, but not in adjacent regions of "normal" acinar structures. PKD1 overexpression was previously implicated in pancreatic cancer.123,124,69,15 Mediators of ADM in vivo are activating mutations of Kras, inflammation and persistent activation of the EGF-R. Approximately 95% of all pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) express either somatic activating mutations of Kras or show increased epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) signaling. In a transgenic animal model, in which an oncogenic mutant of Kras is expressed in acinar cells of the pancreas, ADM and progression to PanIN lesions are observed. These events caused by mutated Kras are further potentiated and lead to pancreatic cancer, when additional pancreatic inflammation occurs.123,124,103
In transgenic mice that express TGFa (EGF-R ligand) in the pancreatic epithelium, in areas where acinar cells undergo ADM, the PKD expression pattern was altered. Of the three PKD isoforms, PKD1, PKD2 and PKD3, acinar cells of normal pancreas express only PKD3. As a result of TGFa signaling, PKD1 expression and activity can be detected in regions of ADM, PanIN1 and PanIN2 pre-neoplastic lesions, while the 2 other PKD isoforms are not involved in these processes (their expression decreased in regions of ADM). As the author wrote questions remaining are i) how PKD1 expression is upregulated by both, mutant Kras and EGFR signaling?; and ii) how both pathways can mediate activation of PKD1? Since PKD1 activity downstream of Kras was determined by measuring nPKC-mediated activating phosphorylations, an involvement of the novel PKCs - PKCe and/or PKC5 is most likely, and this is currently under investigation.123,124
A more detailed analysis showed that the knockout of PKD1 delays the progression of ADM areas to PanINs. Introduction of wildtype PKD1 increased ADM events in 3D explant cell culture approximately 2-fold and constitutively-active PKD1 approximately 6-fold as compared to virus control or kinase dead PKD1. However, ducts generated by active PKD1 were neither as large, nor as well developed as ducts obtained when metaplasia was induced with TGFa. PKD1 has been shown to activate nuclear factor k-B (NF-kB) and Notch; and NFkB and Notch both cooperate in some signaling pathways.103,125,15,100 Since specific small molecule PKD inhibitors exis, PKD1 is a promising new target to prevent ADM and further progression to PanIN pancreatic lesions.123,124 Finally, increased PKD1 activity can be detected in regions of pancreatitis, in ADM, PanIN1 and PanIN2 pre-neoplastic pancreatic lesions103 and in pancreatic cancer.100,126,69
Human Papilloma Viruses (HPV) In recent years, the human papilloma virus (HPV) and its link with HNSCC, particularly in oropharyngeal tumors, has been illustrated. Not only can HPV be used as a biomarker of prognostic significance, but also as a preventative target. There are more than 100 subtypes
UB
ana«
of HPV, some of which are involved in carcinogenesis and have been designated as high-risk HPVs (e.g. HPV-16 and -18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 66)127, type 16 is most commonly associated with HNSCC. HPV is a double-stranded DNA virus that encodes several proteins, among which are three oncoproteins: E5, E6, and E7. HPV infection is an early, and probably initiating, oncogenic event in HNSCCs. High-risk oncogenic HPV subtypes have been shown to be capable of transforming oral epithelial cells through the viral oncoproteins E6 and E7. In the USA, about 4080% of oropharyngeal cancers are caused by HPV, whereas in Europe the proportion varies from around 90% in Sweden to less than 20% in communities with the highest tobacco use. Patients tend to be younger, with no prior history of tobacco and/or heavy alcohol consumption. There is evidence that HPV-positive HNSCC is a sexually transmitted disease. A strong association between sexual behavior (oral sex) and risk of oropharyngeal cancer as well as HPV-16-positive HNSCC has been demonstrated.8128 HPV 16 and 18 are well known because they have been shown to significantly increase the risk of cervical cancer in women who have persistent infections with these two types of HPV.11
The HPV E6 protein binds p53 and promotes its degradation, whereas E7 protein binds and inactivates pRb liberating E2F. E2F activates genes responsible for cell cycle progression through the G1 to S phase, including cyclin A, E and DNA polymerase, causing inactivation of checkpoints and regulatory pathways, and ultimately promoting cellular proliferation and transformation. These viral oncoproteins determine cell cycle entry and inhibition of p53-mediated apoptosis. HPV-dependent inhibition of pRb promotes p16 accumulation. p16 represents a surrogate marker of HPV-positive HNSCC (see below8,129,118). In contrast to HPV-negative tumours, the expression of CDKN2A, encoding p16INK4A, is highly upregulated, but often inactivated and cyclin D1 is often overexpressed in HNSCC contributing to increased proliferation116, but its amplification is infrequent.118 Expression of total and nuclear EGFR was higher in p16-negative tumors (HPV-) compared to p16-positive tumors (HPV+).90,11 Doorslaer and Burk showed that oncogenic types papilloma virus (HPV) specifically activate the hTERT promoter, while non-oncogenic types do not.92 Additionally, TERT has been described to have influence in several other molecules and pathways, which modify responses to inflammation, cell death, apoptosis and DNA damage responses, EMT and oncogenesis. TERT binds to c-MYC and recruits the complex to heparanase promoter to upregulate heparanase expression promoting invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer cells; furthermore, TERT-activated Wnt/p-Catenin signalling promotes c-MYC expression, which could in turn activate TERT transcription and expression in a positive feedback loop; It was also described that TERT overexpression upregulated the expression and transcriptional activity of a key cell cycle regulator, cyclin D1, in human prostate epithelial cell lines; (iii) finally, it has been
East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 49 shown that TERT regulation of ITGB1 in the MDM2-FOXO3a- ITGB pathway is able to promote gastric cancer invasion; (iv) TERT is capable of activating the transcription of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in WI-38 and HeLa cells, this activation being independent of telomerase activity and telomere maintenance.55 hTERT can modulate classical cancer pathways including NF-kB, TGF-p/Smad, and Wnt signaling that all contribute to the metastatic potential and stem cell phenotype of cancer cells.65
Resistance to cancer treatment - Ionizing Radiation and Drugs
In a paper Hamakawa et al. focused on the 4 molecules, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARy), and progesterone receptor, that are, respectively, associated with the proliferation and the differentiation of OSCC (oral squamous cell carcinoma) and SGC (salivary gland cancer). Gefitinib ("Iressa," ZD1839), a small molecule EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, can inhibit the proliferation of OSCC cell lines in a dose- and time-dependent manner and lead to cell cycle arrest with accumulation of cells in the G1 phase, and a decrease of cells in S phase. The agent suppressed tumor metastasis in the animal model. Furthermore, a cooperative antiproliferative effect was obtained when cancer cells were treated with radiation followed by Gefitinib. While radiation alone did not significantly affect p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and MAP kinase kinase (MEK)1/2 autophosphorylation, the combination of gefitinib and radiation completely inhibited the downstream signaling of EGFR. Gefitinib enhanced tumor radioresponsiveness by multiple mechanisms, including the growth inhibition and effects on DNA repair after exposure to radiation. Next, the level of COX-2 expression correlated inversely with increased tumor radiation sensitivity. Treatment with Celecoxib, a COX-2 selective inhibitor, enhanced the radioresponsiveness of HSC-2 cells, which constitutively expressed COX-2. Another promising molecular target is the PPARy, which is a member of the nuclear superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors. Recent studies have demonstrated that PPARy ligands induce cellular differentiation and inhibit cell growth in carcinomas of various types. These data suggest that synthetic PPARy ligands may be useful for molecular targeting of oral cancer.130
Aravindan N. et al. studies indicated that ionizing radiation (IR) induces NF-KB-dependent clonal expansion of therapy resistant tumor cells. Functional NF-kB mediates telomerase activity by binding to the kB binding region in the promoter region of TERT, induced also by IR. Elimination of the NF-kB recognition site on telomerase or muting NF-kB compromises IR-induced telomerase promoter activation, confirmed by authors results. The authors investigated whether mitigation of NF-KB-dependent telomerase activation by EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor can enhance IR-induced celling killing. SCC-4 and SCC-9 cells exposed to IR with or without Pelitinib (EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor) were
50 East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 examined for NF-kB and hTERT transcription using luciferase reporter assays. Pelitinib inhibited NF-kB activity and potentiates IR-induced cell killing. Furthermore, authors found that Pelitinib inhibited IR-induced TERT transcription, transactivation and telomerase activation in IR-exposed and NF-kB-overexpressed cells. The authors proposed that if IR-induced NF-KB-mediated cell survival supported by telomerase activation, can be inhibited with Pelitinib treatment, one could further enhance therapeutic outcome in squamous cell carcinoma.53
In a previous study Tamatani T. et al demonstrated that human head and neck cancer cells have significantly enhanced levels of transcription factor nuclear factor (NF)-kB activity compared to their normal counterparts, suggesting that NF-kB plays an important role in the development of this type of cancer. However, it has been reported that chemotherapeutic agents and radiation activate NF-kB activity in cancer cells, thus making the cells chemoresistant and radioresistant. In addition, they have shown that the suppression of NF-kB activity enhanced apoptosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. The authors examined whether Cepharanthin-induced inhibition of NF-kB activity enhances radiosensitivity in human oral carcinoma cells. Cepharanthin is a biscoclaurine alkaloid extracted from the roots of Stephania cepharantha hayata, and is widely used in Japan for the treatment of patients with leucopenia, nasal allergy, and venomous snakebites. Gamma-irradiation (IR) induces NF-kB activity in oral carcinoma cells through the activation of upstream molecules, including Akt and IkB kinase. However, a luciferase assay revealed that cepharanthin suppresses IR-induced NF-kB activity in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells, thereby enhancing the radio-sensitivity. In an in vivo study, B88 cells (oral SCC cell line) were s.c. inoculated into the backs of nude mice. Tumor-bearing nude mice received either cepharanthin, IR alone, or a combination of cepharanthin and IR. The combined treatment suppressed tumor growth significantly more than either cepharanthin or IR alone. Cepharanthin inhibited the production of IR-induced IL-6 and IL-8, which are downstream targets of NF-kB. In quantitative real-time RT-PCR, IR also induced the expression of anti-apoptotic proteins (cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein (cIAP)-1 and -2) in carcinoma cells. Treatment of cancer cells with Cepharanthin combined with exposure to IR decreased cIAP-1 and -2 mRNA expression. These findings suggested that the combination of radiotherapy and Cepharanthin could enhance radiosensitivity in the treatment of human oral cancer.131
Telomerase activity (TA), frequently observed in cancer, compensates for telomere shortening thus preventing cell senescence and conferring resistance to therapy. In a study, Papanikolaou V. et al. investigated the expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and TA and their regulation, as well as apoptotic rates and correlation with the presence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), in irradiated tumour-derived breast cancer cells. In 50
MB
BtSSJB
breast cancer tissue samples hTERT mRNA expression and TA were correlated with cell features (HER2, Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor status). hTERT/TA were found increased only in irradiated HER2-positive cells, which were found to be more radioresistant, while HER2 knockdown led to hTERT/TA downregulation. HER2 was found to mediate hTERT expression through activation of Nuclear Factor-kappa B (NF-kB) and c-myc. The study suggests that following irradiation, HER2 receptor activates hTERT/telomerase, increasing the breast cancer cells' survival potential, through sequential induction of transcription factors NF-kB and c-myc.132 However, in a cross sectional study 80 cases of BCC including at least 2 millimeter of surrounding normal skin were selected and analyzed. Immunohistochemical method is used for evaluation of membranous expression of HER2 protein in BCC compared to normal skin. Of 80 cases studied, 34 (42.5%) were female and 46 (57.5%) were male. Membranous staining was found in 44 (55%) of normal surrounding skin and 6 (7.5%) of BCC cases. The increased membranous expression of HER2 in surrounding normal skin compared to BCC was statistically significant. Above findings suggest that HER2 protein could be a factor in developing of BCC and can be used as a negative marker in diagnosis of BCC.133 Additionally, Liu B et al. found that the expression of c-erbB-1 oncogene in all BCC increased by different degrees and the expression of c-erbB-2 oncogene in BCC was significantly reduced or lost when compared to that in normal epidermal cells. Furthermore, apparent negative and positive relationships were observed respectively between the tumor differentiation and the expression of c-erbB-1 and c-erbB-2 oncogenes in SCC.134
As it was mentioned above a role for NF-kB has been implicated also in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma. This transcription factor can regulate hTERT gene transcription, which was found to be at high levels in this carcinoma. However, positive effects of NF-kB on hTERT protein synthesis in HepG(2) cells were unknown. The authors showed that LPS (specific binding to TLR4 (Toll-Like Receptor 4) to activate NF-kB) was positive for NF-kB p65 mRNA expression and activation, and also up-regulated hTERT mRNA and protein expressions at 36h in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, MG-132 (blocking the activity of 26S proteasome and thereby preventing nuclear translocation of NF-kB) significantly inhibited activation of NF-kB and mRNA expression. And also reduced the expression of hTERT at both mRNA and protein levels at 36h in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, dexamethasone inhibited LPS-induced activation of NF-kB and expression of the hTERT in HepG(2) cells. These findings suggest that NF-kB may modulate hTERT mRNA level, importantly, in protein level in HepG(2) cells and dexamethasone inhibits LPS-induced hTERT via blocking NF-kB.98
Activation of NF-kB up-regulates cell cycle mediators (cyclin D1, c-Myc), anti-apoptotic (c-FLIP,
survivin, Bcl-XL) and adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, ELAM-1,VCAM-17), proteolytic enzymes (e.g., MMP, uPA),and pro-inflammatory factors (PGHS-2 (COX-2), LOX, prostaglandins, cytokines - IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-23, TNF, TGF-P, EGF), iNOS, chemokines (CCL2,CCL20), that promote an invasive phenotype. In particular NF-kB provides a mechanistic link between inflammation and tumorigenesis. NF-kB is a major factor which controls apoptosis - based tumor immune surveillance mechanisms of pre-neoplastic and malignant cells. NF-kB also regulates tumor angiogenesis (VEGF) and invasiveness, and may contribute to chemo- and radioresistance of tumor cells (see above).99,28
Ionizing radiation (IR) instantaneously causes the formation of water radiolysis products that contain some reactive oxygen species (ROS), ROS are also suggested to be released from biological sources in irradiated cells.28 The results of Rzeszowska-Wolny et al. also showed that ionizing radiation activates cellular processes which produce long-lasting ROS and RNS (Reactive nitrogen species) radicals, which may have different sources in different cell types and could participate in cellular signaling networks important for radiosensitivity and mode of cell death.135,136 The free radicals generated by ionizing radiation can signal p53 translocation to the nucleus.136
Increases in reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been implicated in age-related diseases, including cancer. The serine/threonine kinase protein kinase D1 (PKD1) is a stress-responsive kinase and sensor for reactive oxygen species, which can initiate cell survival through NF-kappaB signaling. It was previously shown that in response to ROS, PKD1 is activated at the mitochondria and regulates the cellular response by activating the NFkB pathway.67 However, the initial signaling events leading to localization of PKD1 to the mitochondria are not completely known.142 PKD1 is activated by oncogenic Ras expression and PKD1 promotes Ras OIS (Oncogene-induced senescence) by mediating inflammatory cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) via modulation of NF-kB activity 44,95. The authors demonstrate that ROS-protein kinase C5 (PKC5)-PKD1 axis is essential for the establishment and maintenance of IL-6/IL8 induction, thus preventing cancer occurrence through induction of cell senescence program. In addition, ablation of PKD1 causes the bypass of Ras OIS, and promotes cell transformation and tumorigenesis. Thus, the authors data provide evidence to support that PKD1 could potentially act as a tumor suppressor to prevent cancer development at an early stage in the context of oncogenic Ras activation in ER:Ras IMR90 cells (human diploid fibroblasts transduced with an ER:RAS).137 It is known that PKC5 activity modulates also PKD1 activation in oxidative damage in Parkinson's disease (PD) models.138 PKD1 activation mediated by a Src family kinase cascade was observed by Bollag after UVB exposure and UVB-elicited oxidative stress in mouse keratinocytes.143,144 From the other site leukocytes are the main source of RNS and
ROS acting as chemical effectors in inflammation-driven carcinogenesis.99
As already mentioned, HIF-1 (Hypoxia inducible factor-1), the key mediator in hypoxia signaling pathways, is crucially involved in hypoxia-induced tumor development. Recent research of Scherbakov AM et al shows that Snail protects breast cancer cell from hypoxia attack, at least partly via P-catenin which up-regulated expression of HIF-1 dependent genes and inhibits apoptosis. Snail1 knock-down enhanced the hypoxia-induced inhibition of cell proliferation giving the direct evidence of Snail1 involvement into cell protection from hypoxia attack. Furthermore, the same authors found that decrease in the estrogen dependency is correlated with increase in Snail1 expression and activity, and demonstrated the Snail1 involvement in the negative regulation of ER, and showed that Snail1 inhibition partially restores the sensitivity of the estrogen-hyposensitive cells to antiestrogen tamoxifen.139,140 PKD1-mediated phosphorylation of SNAI1 (Snail1,Snail) occurs in the nucleus and generates a nuclear, inactive DNA/SNAI1 complex that shows decreased interaction with its co-repressor Ajuba. Analysis of human tissue samples with a newly-generated phosphospecific antibody for PKD1-phosphorylated SNAI1 showed that regulation of SNAI1 through PKD1 occurs in vivo in normal breast ductal tissue and is decreased or lost in invasive ductal carcinoma.141
It has been shown previously that the transcription factor HIF-1 is induced in tumor cells not only by different cytokines and prostaglandins, but also by ROS and RNS. This obviously includes radiation-induced activation of HIF-1. HIF-1 is a heterodimeric transcription factor consisting of a constitutively expressed P-subunit and an oxygen-regulated a-subunit. The author investigations revealed no correlation between basal HIF-1 a levels and the survival fraction in irradiated tumor cell line simplying that basal HIF-1 a levels in human tumor cell lines obviously do not predict their radiosensitivity under normoxia.141 Administration of the HIF-1 inhibitor YC-1 to hypoxic cobalt-treated cells derived from squamous-cell carcinoma of the larynx effectively inhibited HIF-1 a expression, and enhanced the sensitivity of cells to radiation, decreasing the surviving fraction to that of normoxic cells. YC-1 was found to reduce the number of tumor lesions after tumor cell inoculation in nude mice. Compared to radiation therapy alone, inhibition of radiation-induced HIF-1 activation by YC-1 led to a significant reduction in tumor cell growth.145
Thus, IR-induces NF-kB, telomerase activity and hTERT transactivation53,131, leading to radioresistant and chemoresistant cells population in different tumour cells. COX-2 expression, also correlated inversely with increased tumor radiation sensitivity.130 COX-2 gene is also NF-kB targeted gene. Furthermore, EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (Gefitinib, Pelitinib)130,53, NF-kappaB inhibitors (Cepharanthin131, EGCG99, COX-2 selective inhibitor (Celecoxib)130, HIF-1 inhibitors (YC-1)145, and PKD1 unspecific inhibitor
52 East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 Resveratrol99 all increase tumor cell sensitivity toward radiotherapy.
Additionally, resistance of Lung Adenocarcinomas to Gefitinib or Erlotinib (EGFR kinase inhibitors) was associated with a secondary mutation in the EGFR Kinase Domain (T790M substitution of methionine for threonine at position 790 - exon 20), deletions in exon 19 and L858R mutation in exon 21. The mutation - T790M was not detected in untreated tumor samples. EGFR mutation (EGFRvIII)23, corresponds to a deletion of the extracellular domain. This variant has been found in 42% of HNSCC, related to the poor response to monoclonal antibody Cetuximab (competitively inhibits EGFR).24 Interestingly, EGFRvIII displays ligand-independent signaling, but has low constitutive activity. The low constitutive activity is enough to impart cancer cells with increased signaling, however its growth advantage is due to the fact that these receptors are not downregulated by endocytosis.12 As currently approved EGFR-targeted treatments do not appear to be efficacious, alternative targeted therapies against EGFRvIII have been developed, including the vaccine Rindopepimut and the monoclonal antibody mAb806 (also known as ABT-806). Rindopepimut did not pass Phase III clinical trials and was discontinued in 2016. ABT-806 has passed Phase I, and an antibody-drug conjugate based on mAb806 called ABT-414 has also been advanced to Phase II (trial identifier NCT02573324) (review:12). K-Ras mutations have been previously associated with primary resistance to both groups of these drugs26,30,14, since K-Ras altertions lie downstream of the receptor. Approximately 95% of all pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) express either somatic activating mutations of Kras or show increased epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) signaling.8,9 It is thought that oncogenic KRas is an initial event leading to pancreatic cancer. Oncogenic KRas upregulates the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) and its ligands TGFa and EGF, which leads to additional activation of wildtype KRas; and activity of both pathways are needed for pancreatic tumorigenesis. Major downstream signaling cascades activated by active KRas in pancreatic cancer are the PI3-K/ PDK1/Akt (known also as PKB) and Raf/MEK1/2/ERK1/2 (Extracellular signal Regulated Kinase) pathways.10 PKD1 activity is also elevated in presence of a mutant Kras, or after EGFR-mediated activation of endogenous wildtype Kras. As a result of such signaling, PKD1 expression and activity can be detected in regions of ADM, PanIN1 and PanIN2 pre-neoplastic lesions, while the 2 other PKD isoforms are not involved in these processes.10 Pao et al. examined 60 lung adenocarcinoma patients and showed that K-ras mutations are associated with a lack of sensitivity to gefitinib or erlotinib. K-ras mutations seem to be resistant to EGFR targeting agents and are reported to be mutually exclusive to EGFR or HER2 gene mutations.146 In terms of mutations to EGFR-pathway proteins, the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy has been best studied in cancers with K-RAS mutations, with the consensus that these cancers will display primary
UB
BtSSjB
resistance to EGFR inhibitors. The FDA now requires an accompanying PCR diagnostic test for K-RAS prior to the prescription of cetuximab or panitumumab for colon cancer.12
Oncogenic KRas upregulates the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) and its ligands, which leads to additional activation of wildtype KRas; and activity of both pathways are needed for pancreatic tumorigenesis.103 Table with frequency of RAS mutations according to cancer type was recently given by Kodaz et al. - Figure1.31
Mutations in targeted kinases (proteins) as a cause for drug resistances were also reported for mTOR pahway120, although PI3K inhibitors or the dual mTOR/PI3K inhibitors led to a significant delay in resistance development in several cancer types including leukemias.2
Genome-wide transcriptional profiling shows that aPKC and Smo control the expression of similar genes in tumor cells. aPKC functions downstream of Smo to phosphorylate and activate Gli1, resulting in maximal DNA binding and transcriptional activation. Activated aPKC is upregulated in Smo-inhibitor resistant tumors and targeting aPKC suppresses signaling and growth of resistant BCC cell lines. The results demonstrate aPKC is critical for Hh-dependent processes and implicates aPKC as a new, tumor-selective therapeutic target for the treatment of Smo-inhibitor resistant cancers (probably with Smo and Sufu mutations as well as Gli1/2 amplification).147148
Another reason for chemotherapy resistance are the CSCs (Cancer Stem Cells), which exhibit increased resistance to chemotherapy, because of their resistance to apoptosis and because chemotherapy and radiotherapy strategies mostly targets dividing cells; these CSCs easily escape because they remain mostly in the resting stage of the cell cycle - they are nondividing or slowly dividing.149,150,151 However, they have the potential to become activated resulting in recurrences or metastases. These cells have the ability of self-renewal, maintaining the CSC reservoir and differentiate into the heterogeneous progeny.118
Recent studies revealed that resveratrol induced NPC cells (Nasopharyngeal carcinoma) apoptosis through activating multiple apoptotic pathways. Shen et al. found that resveratrol could turn off the metabolic switch, increased the ROS level, and depolarized mitochondrial membranes in NPC CSCs (Nasopharyngeal carcinomas stem cells).152 These alterations in metabolism occurred concomitantly with the suppression of the CSC properties including the resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, self-renewal capacity, tumor initiation capacity, and metastatic potential in NPC CSCs. Particularly worth mentioning is that resveratrol tackled the nexus of NPC CSCs which resulted in extensive suppression of stemness, EMT, and metabolism-related genes. This extensive suppression in CSCs could also be observed after the authors had ectopically expressed p53, the downstream target of resveratrol. In addition, the suppression of CSC properties by resveratrol could be attenuated by knocking down p53. These findings
UB
ana«
substantiated the notion that p53 may serve as a common link between metabolism, stemness, and EMT in CSCs. It was reported that resveratrol can increase the p53 protein level in breast cancer cell line without altering the p53mRNA levels, suggesting that resveratrol may still be useful to treat tumors with a loss of normal p53 function. Besides, resveratrol could significantly activate intracellular Notch-1 and restore wild-type p53 expression in glioblastoma cells. These findings indicate that resveratrol may be an effective drug for treatment of tumors without normal p53 function.152 Furthermore, resveratrol also inhibited CSC (cancer stem cells) properties in pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, and glioblastoma. Resveratrol could efficiently suppress the invasion and metastasis of tumor cells through reversing the EMT process in lung and breast cancers. It also reduced the self-renewal capacity and stemness gene signatures of CSCs in head and neck cancers.152
The major Green tea catechin (polyphenol) EGCG (epigallocatechin-3-gallate) is also chemopreventive, reverse the EMT process in melanoma cells and increases radiosensitivity.153 Morphological investigations demonstrated that high doses of EGCG (100 and 200 lM) destroyed tumor nest structures and caused cellular degenerative changes, in comparison to untreated control cells. A biological study revealed that EGCG inhibited growth of Oral SCC cells.154
The two plant extract Resveratrol (unspecific PKD1 inhibitor) and EGCG (unspecific NF-kB inhibitor) are potent cardioprotectors, which decreases the unwanted side effects of high doses Celocoxib (COX-2 inihibitor), which is offen used in iiradiated and post iiradiated treatment of SCCs, in order to increases tumor cell sensitivity toward radiochemotherapy.99 At the same time the both substances also suppress expression and activity of
COX-2 (PGHS-2)153,155,156,157 and increase
radiosensitivity (see above).
Discussion:
Oral carcinogenesis is a multi-step process. The first step is the development of potentially malignant disorders (PMDs) known as leukoplakia, erythroplakia33, lichen planus, probably trough mutation in the proteins regulated cell cycle (p16INK4A, p21Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1, p27 kip1, Cyclin D1(amplification).2118 Detection of their mutations could be used for early diagnosis of PMDs. Second mutations in Ras, p53 (TP53) (could be also first), EGFR, hTERT, could be used as markers for early malignant transformation, and probably third in PKD1 and/or E-cadherin genes, leading to activation of EMT, could be used for detection of aggressive alterations. Thus, overexpression of inactivated or mutated forms of p53 in oral epithelial dysplasia has been associated with high risk for transformation to early stage OSCC.37 Early mutations in p53 were detected in erythroplakia (46%), oral lichen planus (33%), leucoplakia (13.3%) and Actinic keratosis, though with low frequencies.162 158 159160 In BCC mutations of p53 (56% of all types of BCCs2 are known to be late events, whereas silencing of 14-3-3 tr takes place early in tumor
East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 53 progression, concomitant with increased expression of PKD1 and Snail and down-regulation of c-myc mRNA18944. In BCCs mutations in p16INK4A (3.5%161) are rare and in EGFR are not detected.11
Mutations in Ras are not detected in PMDs (with exception of Actinic keratose (AK) (16%)26,27, Keratoacanthoma (KA)196 and papillomas190,44, as a first mutation, without mutations in p16INK4a 44 - Table 1 and Table 2), with low frequencies in SCCs (11% harbor activating Ras mutations)26, and frequent overactivation in BCCs (mutations ranging from 10 to 30% (50%) according different authors).38,39,31 Many head and neck cancers are squamous cell carcinomas. More than half a million people are affected every year. The prevalence has continued to gradually increase in recent years. Overall survival in patients with KRAS mutation head and neck tumor is worse. KRAS mutations also demonstrate social differences in head and neck tumors, like many cancers. Though the mutation frequency is 5% in oral cavity tumors in Western societies, it can be seen in up to 18% of cases in Eastern societies. The frequency of KRAS mutation in malignant larynx lesions was 4.8% in one study performed, while there were no HRAS and NRAS mutations. In Eastern societies, the frequency of HRAS mutation in oral cavity tumors can be as much as 35%. KRAS mutation was not detected at all in mouth and hypopharynx cancers in another study conducted. There is KRAS mutation in 11.5% and 3.3% of patients with laryngeal cancer and oropharynx cancer, respectively. NRAS mutation in nasopharynx cancer is reported as 4%, while HRAS mutation is <1% and KRAS mutation is very rare31 (Table 1). Ras can also activate the PI3K signalling cascade, genetic aberrations of this pathway are also not very common in HNSCC, with mutation in p110a catalytic subunit (encoded by the PIK3CA gene) in 6-20% of HNSCC
(amplification).118,41
Since increased expression of hTERT is an early event in the pathogenesis of hyperproliferative skin deseases, overexpressed hTERT (under the control of NF-kB50,51,52,53) is considered as a proproliferative (proinflammatory) marker, rather than cancer marker. Mutations in HTERT promoter of hTERT gene were detected recently in both BCCs and SCCs, which could be use as a marker for cancer transformation.25 The quantitative determination especially of EGFR expression could be used as markers for detection of late PML and SCCs, although there are also some conflicting results (see above). It was also shown recently that 42% of HNSCC possess mutations in the gene of EGFR.24 Thus, detection of mutated genes EGFR and hTERT could be more appropriate for early diagnosis of SCCs.
NF-kB is a key transcription factor that is activated by multiple receptors and regulates the expression of a wide variety of proteins that control innate and adaptive immunity. A number of studies indicate that PKD is a mediator of NF-kB induction in a variety of cells exposed to GPCR agonists or oxidative stress. In view of the increasing recognition of the interplay between inflammation and cancer
54 East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 development, a possible role of PKD in linking these processes is of importance. However, the precise molecular mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Stimulation of human colonic epithelial NCM460 cells with the GPCR agonist and bioactive lipid lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) led to a rapid and striking activation of PKD2, the major isoform of the PKD family expressed by these cells. LPA stimulated the production of interleukin 8 (IL-8), a potent proinflammatory chemokine, and stimulated NF-kB activation. PKD2 gene silencing dramatically reduced LPA-stimulated NF-kB promoter activity and IL-8 production. These results imply that PKD2 mediates LPA-stimulated IL-8 secretion in NCM460 cells through a NF-KB-dependent pathway. PKD2 has also been implicated in mediating NF-kB activation by Bcr-Abl in myeloidleukemia cells. Prostaglandins (e.g., PGE2) produced through COX-2 play a critical role in colon cancer development, and colonic myofibroblasts are major contributors to their generation. Recent results demonstrated that knockdown of PKD1 in these cells prevented the synergistic increase in COX-2 expression induced by the proinflammatory mediators bradykinin and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a. Thus these novel results raise the attractive possibility that PKD plays a critical role in mediating COX-2 expression in response to potent pro-inflammatory mediators in human colonic myofibroblasts.67
NF-kB also plays a critical role in inflammatory and cell death responses during acute pancreatitis. The PKC isoforms PKC5 and e are key regulators of NF-kB activation induced by cholecystokinin-8 (CCK-8), an agonist that induces pancreatitis when administered to rodents at supra-maximal doses. PKD was shown to function downstream of PKC5 and PKCe in pancreatic acinar cells stimulated by CCK-8. Specifically, PKD was necessary for NF-kB activation induced by these GPCR agonists in pancreatic cells. These results identify PKD1 as a novel element in the signaling pathways mediating NF-kB activation in acute pancreatitis.100 PKD has been also identified as one of the critical factors in the development of hypersensitivity pneumonitis caused by microbial agents. Inhibition of PKD1 activation could be an effective way to control acute inflammatory conditions in diverse organs.67
Recently it was shown that Group B streptococci (GBS) are one of the leading causes of life-threatening illness in neonates. In a study Upadhyay K et al, both live and antibiotic-killed GBS induce activation of PKD1 through a pathway that is dependent on the TLR signaling adaptor MyD88 and its downstream kinase IL-1R-associated kinase 1, but independent of TNFR-associated factor 6. Their studies using pharmacological PKD inhibitors and PKD1-knockdown macrophages revealed that PKD1 is indispensable for GBS-mediated activation of MAPKs and NF-kB and subsequent expression of proinflammatory mediators. Furthermore, systemic administration of a PKD inhibitor protects d-galactosamine-sensitized mice from shock-mediated death caused by antibiotic-killed GBS. These findings
UB
BtSgSB
imply that PKD1 plays a critical regulatory role in GBS-induced proinflammatory reactions and sepsis, and inhibition of PKD1 activation together with antibiotic treatment in GBS-infected neonates could be an effective way to control GBS diseases.101
The low level of PKD1 expression in highly invasive lines was due to epigenetic silencing by DNA methylation68,69 and this down-regulation of PKD1 leads also to increase expression of MMPs (metalloproteinase), another factor connected with invasive behaviour.107,163,172 There are conflicting results concerning the use of MMPs expression as markers for tumors lesions, also closely connected with invasion and metastasis. However increase in their expression could be used as a marker for lesions malignant transformation, especially for MMP-9 and MT1-MMP (MMP-14) / MMP-2, degrades type IV colagen in the Basal membranes10,7,164,165,166,90,167 and major proteinases associated with increase invasive activity168 146 169 (increased in both SCCs and BCCs). Previously it was suggested that BCCs do not have much metastatic potential because of the retention of high levels of E-cadherin expression. Matrix metalloproteinases capable of cleaving E-cadherin are MMP-3 and -77 170 (MMP-99 22 and MMP-14146170 also according recent data (authors' remark)), which points out how MMPs may mediate invasion, not only by directly degrading matrix, but also by cleaving transmembrane proteins and receptors. E-cadherin expression is reduced in particularly infiltrative BCCs that are also known to produce MMP-7.7 Absence of E-cadherin expression are also associated with morpheaform and recurrent BCC with MMP-1 immunostai44ning in tumor cells, MMP-9 expression in stromal cells.171
As results of Storz and Balaji suggest downregulation of PKD1, is closely connected with induction of EMT and hormone-insensitive phenotype in breast and prostate cancer.15,29,172,173,174,122 Using EMT markers (vimentin, fibronectin, N-cadherin, vs, E-cadherin; and transcriptional factors - Snail, Slug, Twist; HIF-1a), we could not differentiate late PMDs of early cancer lesions. These markers are useful for detection of aggressive alteration in tumour pathogenesis, which is of importance when a surgical procedure is planned.10 Several published articles comment the use of E-cadherin expression, together with one of the mesenchymal markers - vimentin or fibronectin, instead of increased P-catenin nuclear staining, for reliable detection of EMTransion, e.g. aggressive alteration.175
We can speculate that detection of PKD1 gene mutations in head and neck cancer will detect again aggressive alteration and induction of EMT phenotype, closely connected with increase metastasic abilities and poor prognosis. There is no data for PKD1 expression in the PMDs leading to SCCs, nor for detected mutations in SCCs, PKD1 is down-regulated in SCC, as a result of genetic and epigenetic alterations.71 Detection of PKD1 gene mutations (and/or, Ras (exc. AK), TP53, EGFR, HERT), will be usefull, at least for early diagnosis of SCCs (SCCs do not express PKD170,
UB
ansa
however it expresses higher level (copy number) of hTERT, EGFR and c-Myc. BCCs showed increased expression of PKD1 when compared with normal epidermis70, therefore it could be usefull for early diagnostics of BCCs, normal human keratinocytes express PKD1 in very low levels, detectable only using Quantitative Real Time-PCR.73,72 However there is no data for PKD1 expression in several precancerous lesions leading to BCCs10,44, nor for activating mutations in PRKD1 (PKD1 gene) in BCCs, nor for down-regulation (mutations) in aggressive types of BCCs.11 PKD1 is down-regulate in SCC71 and its overexpression promoted the growth of HNSCC tumor xenografts71 from one site, and from another high PRKD1 mRNA expression as a single marker (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.28-3.14, Wald's p = 0.002) and positive lymph node status (HR 4.00, 95% CI 2.22-7.37, Wald's p 0.001) independently predicted for unfavorable diseasefree survival (DFS), clinicopathological factors required to accurately identify patients at high risk for recurrence in operable laryngeal cancer.177 Second late increase in PKD1 expression is connected with high metastatic potential of laryngeal SCC177 and melonama.183 Activating mutations in PRKD1 (PKD1 gene) was detected in 73% of Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma (PLGA) -E710D amino acid substitution (p.Glu710Asp).17695 148
Conclusions:
The development of biomarkers that can play a role in the earlier detection of tumor cells, offering prognostic information can be used as targeted therapies (Table 2). Proteins levels are subjects of complex regulation on different levels -DNA transcription, regulation of the levels and stability of mRNA, and regulation of the halflive of proteins (synthesis, degradation, activity/phosphorylation). Thus, identification of mutations as markers for early malignant transformation could be more appropriate not only for early diagnosis of cancer but could potentially influence treatment strategies in head and neck cancer (HNC), since mutations in EGFR and Ras genes are closely associated with resistance to cancer treatment.
PKD1 could be more appropriate target for treatment of PMDs, rather than treatment of cancer lesions. Inhibition of PKD1 activity in ICR mice, using Peracetylated (-) -epigallocatechin-3 -gallate
(AcEGCG), decreases expression of stem cells marker CD34, reversed the observed alterations, results of the two steps according (DMBA)-initiated and 12-0-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-promoted skin tumorigenesis protocol in ICR mice, keratinocytes proliferation and papillomas growth (possessing Ras mutations).97 However, additional studies are necessary to prove or reject this hypothesis, since silencing of PKD1 in hTert (N-hTERT) keratinocytes (PMD cell line, possessing p16INK4a mutation) have decreased the markers of keratinocytes differentiation-K10 and Involucrin.78 Contrary the knockout of PKD1 delays the progression of ADM (Acinar-to-ductal metaplasia) areas to PanINs (pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia).123,124 PKD1 in normal murine mammary
East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 55 gland (NMuMG) epithelial cells is constitutively-active in its basal state and prevents a transition to a mesenchymal phenotype (EMT) (through inhibition of Snail repressed E-cadherin expression).141
In normal human and mouse keratinocytes silencing of PKD1 promote keratinocyte differentiation, rather than EMT.73 178 144 70 In this regard Snail is expressed in a transient manner, in hair placodal cells, during budding morphogenesis of the hair follicle, but is not detectable in the IFE (interfollicular epidermis).179,180 Basal keratinocytes in the transgenic Snail epidermis display an elongated and spindle-like morphology, which implies an enhanced migratory capacity. Finding that transgenic epidermis exhibited lower levels of E-cadherin in regions expressing Snail, and increased expression of MMP-9, support the notion that Snail induces an EMT for tumor progression.180 Snail transgenic mice develop spontaneous tumours: Craene et al. results indicate that enhanced Snail expression contributes to the stabilisation, expansion and survival of skin stem cells in vivo (CD34+), which can result in both skin tumour initiation and malignant progression for a variety of epithelial derived tumour types, such as basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and sebaceous gland carcinoma. Snail expression in a skin-specific p53-null background resulted in accelerated formation of spontaneous tumours and enhanced metastasis.181 Additionally, Snail expression is induced in chronical UV irradiated skin, by ERK/p38/JNK-AP-1 dependenet pathway, but not TGF-p or IL-1P pathways. Elevated expression of Snail, but not Slug, in response to chronic UV irradiation in human skin may contribute to UV irradiation-induced skin tumor development.182 If we concider that BCCs posses early increase PKD1 expression, inactivating Snail, the probable reason for developing of BCCs is mutations in 14-3-3c, making Snail transcriptioanally active.11,95,44
Inhibition or silencing of PKD1 in cancer cells is closely connected with induction of EMT (Epithelial to Mesenchimal Transition) and more aggressive cancer phenotype.122 In this regard reexpression of PKD1, using demethylating agents, was suggested as a treatment strategy in breast and prostate cancer.29,69,122 In contrast of this scheme is a pancreatic cancer, which shows early high PKD1 expresion in response of mutant Kras, or after increased EGFR-mediated activation of endogenous wildtype Kras. As a result of such signaling, increased PKD1 expression and activity can be detected in regions of pancreatitis, ADM, PanIN1 and PanIN2 pre-neoplastic pancreatic lesions103 and in pancreatic cancer.100,126, 69 A recent in vitro and in vivo animal study involving the use of a new PKD1-specific, small-molecule inhibitor (CRT0066101) showed inhibition of pancreatic cancer growth in vivo and suggests the development of PKD1 inhibitors as a novel therapeutic target not only for the treatment of pancreatic cancer126,69, but also for prevention of progression of precancerous lesions to tumors and even prevention of precancerous lesions103,123,124 and blocking/prevention of severe pancreatitis in the early stage of the disease.100 Zhang
56 East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 et al. data consistently showed that either knockdown or overexpression of PKD1 did not significantly alter the proliferation of HNSCC cells in vitro. However, interestingly, induction of PKD1 in vivo by Dox (doxycycline) provided a slight growth advantage to the HNSCC tumor xenografts and resulted in a significant increase in final tumor weight in Dox-induced vs. the non-induced tumors. Overexpression of PKD1 promoted the growth of HNSCC tumor xenografts.71 Thus, reexpression of PRKD1 is not also suitable treatment strategy in HNSCC, since overexpression of PKD1 promoted the growth of HNSCC tumor xenografts71 from one site, and from another PKD1 down-regulation in HNSCC is not a consequence of promoter hypermethylation.71
Late high PKD1 expression was detected not only in laryngeal cancer177, but in malignant metastatic melonamas, connected with cadherin switch - down-regulated E-cadherin and upregulated N-cadherin expression, increased expression of Cyclin D1. In melanoma cells that express high levels of E-cadherin but very low levels of N-cadherin, PKD1 expression is very faint, in contrary in melanoma cells, that express null or very low levels of E-cadherin but high levels of N-cadherin, PKD1 expression was strong with maximal expression in the most aggressive cell line. PKD1 expression significantly correlated with the mesenchymal features of the melanoma cell lines used in this study and was associated with E-cadherin negative/N-cadherin positive phenotype and high metastatic potential (anchorage-independent growth and migration). PKD1 can induce the activation of NFkB, a transcription factor that can directly bind to N-cadherin promoter and activate its expression. In fact, loss of E-cadherin induces NFkB activity and consequent N-cadherin expression in melanoma cells. Thus, regulation of E-cadherin expression by PKD1 could be enough to induce E- to N-cadherin switch, increase P-catenin nuclear staining and Cyclin D1 expression, promote tumor growth, motility and invasion through a process called epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT).183 Protein kinase C inhibitor Go6976 but not Go6983 induces the reversion of E- to N-cadherin switch and metastatic phenotype in melanoma, identifiing the role of inhibited protein kinase D1 in the reversed process called mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET).183 Inhibiton or knocking-down PKD1 could be useful in metastatic cancers with late increased PKD1 expression/activity.95
One possible explanation of the discrepancies, connected with PKD1 function, could be the different mutational status in different cancer types151 and differences in signal pathways in different cell types.
Acknowledgement:
With thanks for the support of Prof. Luchezar Stephanov (Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Dental Faculty, MU-Sofia, Bulgaria) and Prof. Yves Poumay (Cell and Tissue Laboratory, URPHYM, University of Namur (FUNDP), Namur, Belgium).
Compliance with Ethical Standards:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.
References:
1. Villa A, Villa C, Abati S. Oral cancer and oral erythroplakia: an update and implication for clinicians. Aust Dent J. 2011;56(3):253-6.
2. Campo-Trapero J, Cano-Sánchez J, Palacios-Sánchez B, Sánchez-Gutierrez JJ, González-Moles MA, Bascones-Martínez A. Update on Molecular Pathology in Oral Cancer and Precancer. Anticancer Res. 2008;28(2B):1197-205.
3. Jin G. Using biomarkers to detect oral cancer holds potential for saving lives when the cancer is most curable. Biomark Med. 2010;4(6):835-8.
4. Sawhney M, Rohatgi N, Kaur J, Shishodia S, Sethi G, Gupta SD, Deo SV, Shukla NK, Aggarwal BB, Ralhan R. Expression of NF-kB parallels COX-2 expression in oral precancer and cancer: Association with smokeless tobacco. Int J Cancer. 2007;120(12):2545-56.
5. Goodin S, Shiff SJ. NSAIDs for the Chemoprevention of Oral Cancer: Promise or Pessimism? Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(5):1561-4.
6. Karahan N, Baspinar S, Bozkurt KK, Caloglu E, Ciris IM, Kapucuoglu N. Increased expression of COX-2 in recurrent basal cell carcinoma of the skin: a pilot study. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2011; 54(3):526-31.
7. Kerkelä E, Saarialho-Kere U. Matrix metalloproteinases in tumor progression: focus on basal and squamous cell skin cancer. Exp Dermatol. 2003;12(2):109-25.
8. Yavrouian EJ, Sinha UK. Recent Advances in Biomarkers and Potential Targeted Therapies in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. ISRN Surg. 2012;2012:Article ID 715743.
9. Smith A, Teknos TN, Pan Q. Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2013;49(4):287-92.
10. Debski T, Lembas L, Jethon J. Basal Cell Carcinoma. Curent Concepts in Plastic Surgery. InTech 2012.
11. Ivanova PV, Maneva AI. Comparison analysis of Basocellular carcinom and Spinocellular carcinom -Protein Kinase D1, Wnt/ß-catenin and Epithelial to Mesenchimal Transition (markers). IJCRR. 2018;9(2):20193-20251.
12. Wee P, Wang Z. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Cell Proliferation Signaling Pathways. Cancers. 2017;9(52):1-45.
13. Jost M, Kari C, Rodeck U. The EGF receptor - an essential regulator of multiple epidermal functions. Eur J Dermatol. 2000;10(7):505-10.
14. Spallone G, Botti E and Costanzo A. Targeted Therapy in Nomelanoma Skin Cancers. Cancers (Basel). 2011;3(2):2255-2273.
15. Eiseler T, Köhler C, Nimmagadda SC, Jamali A, Funk N, Joodi G, Storz P, Seufferlein T. Protein kinase D1 mediates anchorage-dependent and -independent growth of tumor cells via the zinc finger transcription factor Snail1. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(39):32367-80.
16. Ono M, Kuwano M. Molecular Mechanisms of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors (EGFR)
L»
BBSM
Activation and response to Gefitinib and other EGFR-Targeting Drugs. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(24):7242-51.
17. Kumagai K, Horikawa T, Gotoh A, Yamane S, Yamada H, Kobayashi H, Hamada Y, Suzuki S, Suzuki R. Up-regulation of EGF receptor and its ligands, AREG, EREG, and HB-EGF in oral lichen planus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;110(6):748-54.
18. Orlando B, Bragazzi N, Nicolini C. Bioinformatics and systems biology analysis of genes network involved in OLP (Oral Lichen Planus) pathogenesis. Arch Oral Biol. 2013;58(6):664-73.
19. Zhao M, Fu XL, Lv H. The expression of EGFR in oral lichen planus, squamous cell papilloma and squamous cell carcinoma. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2012;21(6):673-6.
20. Ribeiro DC, Gleber-Netto FO, Sousa SF, Bernardes VD, Guimaräes-Abreu MH, Aguiar MC. Immunohistochemical expression of EGFR in oral leukoplakia: association with clinicopathological features and cellular proliferation. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17(5):e739-e744.
21. Yamada T. Relationship of oral leukoplakia and cancer by immunohistochemical expression of EGF-receptor. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi. 1990;57(1):187-200.
22. Bagan JV, Mata-Roig M, Cortio-Gimeno J, Murillo-Cortes J, Hens-Aumente E, Poveda-Roda R. Bagan L. Epidermal growth factor receptor copy number in potentially malignant oral disorders and oral squamous cell carcinoma: a short communication and preliminary study. J Oral Pathol Med. 2012; 41(9):662-6.
23. Voldborg BR, Damstrup L, Spang-Thomsen M, Poulsen HS. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and EGFR mutations, function ans possible role in clinical trials. Annals of Oncology. 1997;8 (12):1197-1206.
24. Uribe P, Gonzalez S. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: molecular bases for EGFR-targeted therapy. Pathol Res Pract. 2011;207(6):337-42.
25. Griewank KG, Murali R, Schilling B, Schimming T, Möller I, Moll I, Schwamborn M, Sucker A, Zimmer L, Schadendorf D, Hillen U. TERT promoter mutations are frequent in cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinama. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80354.
26. Doma E, Rupp C, Baccarini M. EGFR-Ras-Raf Signaling in Epidermal Stem Cells: Roles in Hair Follicle Development, Regeneration, Tissue Remodeling and Epidermal Cancers. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(10):19361-84.
27. Spencer JM, Kahn SM, Jiang W, DeLeo VA, Weinstein I. Activated ras genes occur in human actinic keratoses, premalignant precursors to squamous cell carcinomas. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131(7):796-800.
28. Multhoff G, Radons J. Radiation, inflammation, and immune responses in cancer. Front Oncol. 2012;2:58.
29. Borges S, Döppler H, Perez EA, Andorfer CA, Sun Z, Anastasiadis PZ, Thompson E, Geiger XJ, Storz P. Pharmacologic reversion of epigenetic silencing of the PRKD1 promoter blocks breast tumor cell invasion and metastasis. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15(2):R66.
30. Pao W, Miller VA, Politi KA, Riely GJ, Somwar R, Zakowski MF, Kris MG, Varmus H. Acquired Resistance of Lung Adenocarcinomas to Gefitinib or Erlotinib Is Associated with a Second Mutation in the EGFR Kinase Domain. PLoS Med. 2005;2(3):e73.
31. Kodaz H, Kostek O, Hacioglu MB, Erdogan B, Kodaz CE, Haclibekirogli I, Turkmen E, Uzunoglu S, Cicin I. Frequency of Ras Mutations (KRAS, NRAS, HRAS) in human solid cancer. EJMO. 2017;1(1):1-7.
32. Naganuma S, Whelan KA, Natsuizaka M, Kagawa S, Kinugasa H, Chang S, Subramanian H, Rhoades B, Ohashi, S, Itoh H, Herlyn M, Diehl JA, Gimotty PA, Klein-Szanto AJ, Nakagawa H. Notch receptor inhibition reveals the importance of cyclin D1 and Wnt signaling in invasive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Cancer Res. 2012;2(4):459-75.
33. Abrahao AC, Bonelli BV, Nunes FD, Dias EP, Cabral MG. Immunohistochemical expression of p53, p16 and hTERT in oral squamous cell carcinoma and potentially malignant disorders. Braz Oral Res. 2011;25(1):34-41.
34. Kuo CL, Lai KC, Ma YS, Weng SW, Lin JP, Chung JG. Gallic acid inhibits migration and invasion of SCC-4 human oral cancer cells through actions of NF-kB, Ras and matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9. Oncol Rep. 2014;32(1):355-61.
35. Park HR, Min SK, Cho HD, Kim KH, Shin HS, Park YE. Expression profiles of p63, p53, survivin, and hTERT in skin tumors. J Cutan Pathol. 2004;31(8):544-9.
36. Stelkovics E, Kiszner G, Meggyeshazi N, Korom I, Varga E, Nemeth I, Molnar J, Marczinovits I, Krenacs T. Selective in situ protein expression profiles correlate with distinct phenotypes of basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Histol Histopathol. 2013;28(7):941-54.
37. Shigeishi H, Sugiyama M, Tahara H, Ono S, Kumar BU, Okura M, Kogo M, Shinohara M, Shindoh M, Shintani S, Hamakawa H, Takata T, Kamata N. Increased telomerase activity and hTERT expression in human salivary gland carcinomas. Oncol Lett. 2011;2(5):845-850.
38. Freinkel RK, Woodley DT. The Biology of the skin. CRC Press, 2001.
39. Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV. Dermatology. V.1, 3-th edition. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2012.
40. Neill GW, Harrison WJ, Ikram MS, Williams TD, Bianchi LS, Nadendla SK, Green JL, Ghali L, Frischauf AM, O'Toole EA, Aberger F, Philpott MP. GLI1 repression of ERK activity correlates with colony formation and impaired migration in human epidermal keratinocytes. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29(4):738-46.
41. Hafner C, Landthaler M, Vogt T. Activation of the PI3K/AKT signalling pathway in non-melanoma skin cancer is not mediated by oncogenic PIK3CA and
58 East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 AKT1 hotspot mutations. Exp Dermatol. 2010;19(8):e222-7.
42. Antal CE, Hudson AM, Kang E, Zanca C, Wirth C, Stephenson NL, Trotter EW, Gallegos LL, Miller CJ, Furnari FB, Hunter T, Brognard J, Newton AC. Cancer-Associated Protein Kinase C Mutations Reveal Kinase's Role as Tumor Suppressor. Cell. 2015;160(3):489-502.
43. Bharadwaj U, Eckols TK, Xu X, Kasembeli MM, Chen Y, Adachi M, Song Y, Mo Q, Lai SY, Tweardy DJ. Small-molecule inhibition of STAT3 in radioresistant head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7(18):26307-30.
44. Ivanova PV, Maneva AI. Protein Kinase D1, Ras, p16 and c-Myc in skin pathology, stromal activity. Src, PKCe, IL-6/ STAT3/ c-Myc , IL-6 and IL-8 -metastatic potential. Protein Kinase C expression profile in Basocellular carcinoma. Arch Derm Res. 2019;submitted.
45. Tsao AS, Kim ES, Hong WK. Chemoprevention of Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54(3):150-80.
46. Cukusic A, Skrobot VN, Sopta M, Rubelj I. Telomerase regulation at the crossroads of cell fate. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;122(3-4):263-72.
47. Dickson MA, Hahn WC, Ino Y, Ronfard V, Wu JY, Weinberg RA, Louis DN, Li FP, Rheinwald JG. Human keratinocytes that express hTERT and also bypass a p16(INK4a)-enforced mechanism that limits life span become immortal yet retain normal growth and differentiation characteristics. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(4):1436-47.
48. Shimamoto H. Telomerase activity in oral squamous cell carcinoma and leukoplakia. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2001;68(1):125-33.
49. Crowe DL, Nguyen DC, Ohannessian A. Mechanism of telomerase repression during terminal differentiation of normal epithelial cells and squamous carcinoma lines. Int J Oncol. 2005;27(3):847-54.
50. Bu D, Johansson ME, Ren J, Xu D, Johnson FB, Edfeldt K, Yan Z. NF-KB-mediated transactivation of telomerase prevents intimal smooth muscle cell from replicative senescence during vascular repair. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(12): 2604-2610.
51. Sheng WY, Chen YR, Wang TCV. A major role of PKC 0 and NFkB in the regulation of hTERT in human T lymphocytes. FEBS Lett. 2006;580(30):6819-6824.
52. Sinha-Datta U, Horikawa I, Michishita E, Datta A, Sigler-Nicot JC, Brown M, Kazanji M, Barrett JC, Nicot C. Transcriptional activation of hTERT through the NF-kB pathway in HTLV-I-transformed cells. Blood. 2004;104(8):2523 -31.
53. Aravindan N, Aravindan S, Herman TS, Natarajan M. EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Pelitinib Regulates Radiation-Induced p65-Dependent Telomerase Activation in Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Radiat Res. 2013;179(3):304-12.
54. Pestana A, Vinagre J, Sobrinho-Simxes M and Soares P. TERT biology and function in cancer: beyond
immortalisation. J Mol Endocrinol. 2017;58: R129-R146.
55. Lewis KA and Tollefsbol TO. Regulation of the Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Subunit through Epigenetic Mechanisms. Front. Genet. 2016;7:83. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00083.
56. Liu H, Moroi Y, Yasumoto S, Kokuba H, Imafuku S, Nakahara T, Dainichi T, Uchi H, Tu Y, Furue M, Urabe K. Immunohistochemical localization of activated Stat3 and hTERT protein in psoriasis vulgaris. Eur J Dermatol. 2006;16(2):205-7.
57. Fujimoto R, Kamata N, Yokoyama K, Ueda N, Satomura K, Hayashi E, Nagayama M. Expression of telomerase components in oral keratinocytes and squamous cell carcinomas. Oral Oncol. 2001;37(2):132-40.
58. Palani J, Lakshminarayanan V, Kannan R. Immunohistochemical detection of human telomerase reverse transcriptase in oral cancer and pre-cancer. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22(2):362.
59. Bettendorf O, Schmidt H, Eltze E, Rody A, Herchenroder F, Jackisch C, Bocker W, Pfleiderer B. Quantitative measurement of telomerase activity and localization of its catalytic subunit (hTERT) in chronic inflammation of capsule formation around various model implants and in sarcomas in a rat model. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;85(3):646-50.
60. Zhong YQ, Xia ZS, Fu YR, Zhu ZH. Knockdown of hTERT by SiRNA suppresses growth of Capan-2 human pancreatic cancer cell via the inhibition of expressions of Bcl-2 and COX-2. J Dig Dis. 2010;11(3):176-84.
61. Li J, Huang X, Xie X, Wang J, Duan M. Human telomerase reverse transcriptase regulates cyclin D1 and G1/S phase transition in laryngeal squamous carcinoma. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011;131(5):546-51.
62. Strazisar M, Rott T, Glavac D. K-RAS and P53 mutations in association with COX-2 and hTERT expression and clinico-pathological status of NSCLC patients. Dis Markers. 2008;25(2):97-106.
63. Gonzalez-Suarez E, Flores JM, Blasco MA. Cooperation between p53 mutation and high telomerase transgenic expression in spontaneous cancer development. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22(20): 7291-301.
64. Fabricius EM, Kruse-Boitschenko U, Khoury R, Wildner GP, Raguse JD, Klein M and Hoffmeister B. Localization of telomerase hTERT protein in frozen sections of basal cell carcinomas (BCC) and tumor margin tissues. Intern J Oncol. 2009;35:1377-1394.
65. Hannen R, Bartsch JW. Essential roles of telomerase reverse transcriptase hTERT in cancer stemness and metastasis. FEBS Letters. 2018;592:2023-2031.
66. Leao R , Apolonio JD, Lee D, Figueiredo A, Tabori U and Castelo-Branco P. Mechanisms of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) regulation: clinical impacts in cancer. J Biomed Sci. 2018;25(22):2-12.
L»
BBSM
67. Rozengur, E. Protein Kinase D Signaling: Multiple Biological Functions in Health and Disease. Physiology (Bethesda). 2011;26(1):23-33.
68. LaValle, C.R., George, K.M., Sharlow, E.R. , Lazo, J.S., Wipf, P., Wang, Q.J.,. PKD1 potential new target for cancer therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1806(2):183-192.
69. Sundram V, Chauhan SC, Jaggi M. Emerging Roles of Protein Kinase D1 in Cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2011;9(8):985-96.
70. Ristich VL, Bowman PH, Dodd ME, Bollag WB. Protein kinase D distribution in normal human epidermis, basal cell carcinoma and psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154(4):586-93.
71. Zhang L, Li Z, Liu Y, Xu S, Tandon M, Appelboom B, LaValle CR, Chiosea SI, Wang L, Sen M, Lui VWY, Grandis JR, Wang QJ. Analysis of oncogenic activities of protein kinase D1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):1107.
72. Ryvkin V, Rashel M, Gaddapara T, Ghazizadeh S. Opposing Growth Regulatory Roles of Protein Kinase D Isoforms in Human Keratinocytes. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(17):11199-208.
73. Ivanova P, Atanasova G, Poumay Y, Mitev V. Knockdown of PKD1 in normal human epidermal keratinocytes increases mRNA expression of keratin 10 and Involucrin: early markers of keratinocyte differentiation. Arch Dermatol Res. 2008;300(3): 139-45.
74. Ivanova P, Ishkitiev N, Kosekova G, Poumay Y, Mitev V. Proproliferative role of Protein Kinase C alpha and Protein Kinase C epsilon through downregulation of ERK1/2 activity in human epidermal keratinocytes. Bulg MJ. 2008;II(3):19-26.
75. Praskova M, Kalenderova S, Miteva L, Poumay Y, Mitev V. Dual role of protein kinase C on Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase activation and human keraticytes proliferation. Exp Dermatol. 2002;11(4):344-8.
76. Ivanova P, Tencheva Z, Mitev V. CaMKII delta stimulates proliferation of normal human epidermal keratinocytes through upregulation of ERK1/2 and c-Myc activity. Bulg MJ. 2008; II(1):36-43.
77. Praskova M, Kalenderova S, Miteva L, Poumay Y, Mitev V. Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaM-kinase) inhibitor KN-62 suppresses the activity of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), c-myc activation and human keratinocyte proliferation. Arch Dermatol Res. 2002;294(4):198-202.
78. Ivanova P, Atanasova G, Poumay Y, Mitev V. Prodifferentiative role of PKD1 in human hTert keratinocytes. CR Acad Bulg Sci. 2007;60(5):557-562.
79. Ivanova P, Poumay Y, Mitev V. Protein Kinase D1 upregulates expression and activity of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 and EGFR in human hTert keratinocytes. CR Acad Bulg Sci. 2007;60(7):785-790.
80. Eckert RL, Efimova T, Dashti SR, Balasubramanian S, Deucher A, Crish JF, Sturniolo M,
East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 59 and Bone F. Keratinocyte Survival, Differentiation, and Death: Many roads lead to Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;7(1):36-40.
81. Seo HR, Kwan YW, Cho CK, Bae S, Lee SJ, Soh JW, Chung HY, Lee YS. PKCa induces differentiation through ERK1/2 phosphorylation in mouse keratinocytes. Exp Mol Med. 2004;36(4):292-9.
82. Meng X, Qiu L, Song H, Dang N (). MAPK pathway involved in epidermal terminal differentiation of normal human epidermal keratinocytes. Open Med. 2018;13:189-195.
83. Bertrand-Vallery V, Belot N, Dieu M, Delaive E, Ninane N, Demazy C, Raes M, Salmon M, Poumay Y, Debacq-Chainiaux F, Toussaint O. Proteomic Profiling of Human Keratinocytes Undergoing UVB-Induced Alternative Differentiation Reveals TRIpartite Motif Protein 29 as a Survival Factor. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10462.
84. Dumesic PA, Scholl FA, Barragan DI, Khavari PA. Erk1/2 MAP kinases are required for epidermal G2/M progression. J Cell Biol. 2009;185(3):409-22.
85. Jensen TG, S0rensen CB, Jensen UB, Bolund L. Epidermolysis bullosa simplex keratinocytes with extended lifespan established by ectopic expression of telomerase. Exp Dermatol. 2003;12(1):71-77.
86. Jordan CT, Cao L, Roberson ED, Duan S, Helms CA, Nair RP, Duffin KC, Stuart PE, Goldgar D, Hayashi G, Olfson EH, Feng BJ, Pullinger CR, Kane JP, Wise CA, Goldbach-Mansky R, Lowes MA, Peddle L, Chandran V, Liao W, Rahman P, Krueger GG, Gladman D, Elder JT, Menter A, Bowcock AM. Rare and Common Variants in CARD14, Encoding an Epidermal Regulator of NF-kappaB, in Psoriasis. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90(5):796-808.
87. Agell N, Bachs O, Rocamora N, Villalonga P. Modulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway by Ca(2+), and calmodulin. Cell Signal. 2002; 14(8):649-54.
88. Tebar F, Llado A, Enrich C. Role of calmodulin in the modulation of the MAPK signalling pathway and the transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor mediated by PKC. FEBS Lett. 2002;517(1-3):206-10.
89. Murphy LO, Blenis J. MAPK signal specificity: the right place at the right time. Trends Biochem Sci. 2006;31(5):268-75.
90. Husain H, Psyrri A, Markovic A, Rampias T, Pectasides E, Wang H, Slebos R, Yarbrough WG, Burtness B, Chung CH. Nuclear epidermal growth factor receptor and p16 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(12):2762-8.
91. Kasper M, Jaks V, Hohl D, Toftgard R. Basal cell carcinoma — molecular biology and potential new therapies. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(2):455-63.
92. Van Doorslaer K, Burk RD. Association between hTERT activation by HPV E6 proteins and oncogenic risk. Virology. 2012;433(1):216-9.
93. Tran QT, Kennedy LH, Leon CS, Bodreddigari S, Goodwin SB, Sutter CH, Sutter TR. EGFR regulation of epidermal barrier function. Physiol Genomics. 2012;44(8):455-69.
94. Rykx A, De Kimpe L, Mikhalap S, Vantus T, Seufferlein T, Vandenheede J, Lint J. Protein kinase D: a family affair. FEBS Lett. 2003;546:81-86.
95. Ivanova PV, Maneva AI. Protein Kinase D1 -structure, activation, regulation, substrates and functions. Role in skin pathology. Arch Derm Res. 2019; accepted. doi.org/10.1007/s00403-019-01946-5
96. Schomwasser D, Marais R, Marshal C, Parker P. Activation of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase/Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Pathway by Conventional, Novel, and Atypical Protein Kinase C Isotypes. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18(2):790-798.
97. Chiou YS, Sang Sh, Cheng KH, Ho CT, Wang YJ, Pan MH. Peracetylated (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (AcEGCG) potently prevents skin carcinogenesis by suppressing the PKD1-dependent signaling pathway in CD34+ skin stem cells and skin tumors. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34(6):1315-1322.
98. Zuo QP, Liu SK, Li ZJ, Li B, Zhou YL, Guo R, Huang LH. NF-kappaB p65 modulates the telomerase reverse transcriptase in the HepG(2) hepatoma cell line. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011; 672(1-3):113-20.
99. Multhoff G, Molls M, Radons J. Chronic inflammation in cancer development. Front Immunol. 2012;12(2):98.
100. Yuan J, Pandol SJ. PKD signaling and pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(7):651-659.
101. Upadhyay K, Park JE, Yoon TW, Halder P, Kim YI, Metcalfe V, Talati AJ, English BK, Yi AK. Group B Streptococci Induce Proinflammatory Responses via a Protein Kinase D1-Dependent Pathway. J Immunol. 2017;198(11):4448-4457.
102. Cowell CF, Döppler H, Yan IK, Hausser A, Umezawa Y, Storz P. Mitochondrial diacylglycerol initiates protein-kinase D1-mediated ROS signaling. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:919-928.
103. Döppler H, Panayiotou R, Reid EM, Maimo W, Bastea L, Storz P. The PRKD1 promoter is a target of the KRas-NF-KB pathway in pancreatic cancer. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33758.
104. Liggett WH Jr, Sidransky D. Role of the p16 tumor suppressor gene in cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(3): 1197-206.
105. Kubo A, Nakagawa K, Varma RK, Conrad NK, Cheng JQ, Lee WC, Testa JR, Johnson BE, Kaye FJ, Kelley MJ. The p16 Status of Tumor Cell Lines Identifies Small Molecule Inhibitors Specific for Cyclin-dependent Kinase 4. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5(12):4279-86.
106. Sherr CJ, Roberts JM. CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 1999;13(12):1501-12.
107. Rashel M, Alston N, Ghazizadeh S. Protein Kinase D1 Has a Key Role in Wound Healing and Skin Carcinogenesis. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134:902-909.
108. Singh A, Singh A, Sand JM, Heninger E, Hafeez BB, Verma AK. Protein Kinase Ce, Which Is Linked to Ultraviolet Radiation-Induced Development of Squamous Cell Carcinomas, Stimulates Rapid Turnover of Adult Hair Follicle Stem Cells. J Skin Cancer. 2013;2013:452425:13 pages.
UB
BtSgSB
109. Wheeler DL, Li Y, Verma AK. Protein Kinase C Epsilon Signals Ultraviolet Light-induced Cutaneous Damage and Development of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Possibly Through Induction of Specific Cytokines in a Paracrine Mechanism. Photochem Photobiol. 2005;81(1): https://doi.org/10.1562/2004-08-12-RA-271.1.
110. Jansen AP, Verwiebe EG, Dreckschmidt NE, Wheeler DL, Oberley TD, Verma AK. Protein kinase C-epsilon transgenic mice: a unique model for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 2001;61(3):808-12.
111. Akita Y. Protein kinase Cepsilon: novel aspects of its multiple functions in cellular signaling. FEBS J. 2008;275(16):3987.
112. Balato A, Caprio RD, Lembo S, Mattii M, Megna M, Schiattarella M, Tarantino G, Balato N, Ayala F, Monfrecola G. Mammalian target of rapamycin in inflammatory skin conditions. Eur J Infalmm 12(2): 341-350.
113. Sever R, Brugge JS (2015) Signal Transduction in Cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;5(4):a006098.
114. Badura S, Tesanovic T, Pfeifer H, Wystub S, Nijmeijer BA, Liebermann M, Falkenburg JH, Ruthardt M, Ottmann OG. Differential effects of selective inhibitors targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80070.
115. Rodrik-Outmezguine VS, Okaniwa M, Yao Z, Novotny CJ, McWhirter C, Banaji A, Won H, Wong W, Berger M, de Stanchina E, Barratt DG, Cosulich S, Klinowska T, Rosen N, Shokat KM. Overcoming mTOR resistance mutations with a new-generation mTOR inhibitor. Nature. 2016;534(7606):272-6.
116. Klein JD, Grandis JR. The molecular pathogenesis of head and neck cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010; 9(1):1-7.
117. Pandolfi S, Stecca B. Hedgehog-Gli signaling in basal cell carcinoma and other skin cancers: prospects for therapy. Res Rep Biol. 2015;6:55-71.
118. Suh Y, Amelio I, Urbano TG, Tavassoli M. Clinical update on cancer: molecular oncology of head and neck cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5(1):e1018.
119. Steinberg SF. Regulation of Protein Kinase D1 Activity. Mol Pharmacol. 2012;81(3):284-291.
120. Rodrik-Outmezguine VS, Okaniwa M, Yao Z, Novotny CJ, McWhirter C, Banaji A, Won H, Wong W, Berger M, de Stanchina E, Barratt DG, Cosulich S, Klinowska T, Rosen N, Shokat KM. Overcoming mTOR resistance mutations with a new-generation mTOR inhibitor. Nature. 2016;534(7606):272-6.
121. Raaby L, Otkjsr K, Salvskov-Iversen ML, Johansen C, and Iversen L. A Characterization of the expression of 14-3-3 isoforms in psoriasis, basal cell carcinoma, atopic dermatitis and contact dermatitis. Dermatol Reports. 2010;2(2):e14.
122. Du C, Zhang C, Hassan S, Biswas MH, Balaji KC. Protein Kinase D1 Suppresses Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition through Phosphorylation of Snail. Cancer Res. 2010;70(20):7810-9.
UB
BBgM
123. Liou GY, Döppler H, Braun UB, Panayiotou R, Scotti BM, Radisky DC, Crawford HC, Fields AP, Murray NR, Wang QJ, Leitges M, Storz P. Protein kinase D1 drives pancreatic acinar cell reprogramming and progression to intraepithelial neoplasia. Nat Commun. 2015;20(6):6200.
124. Liou GY, Leitges M, Storz P. Pancreatic oncogenic signaling cascades converge at Protein Kinase D1. Cell Cycle. 2015;14(10):1489-90.
125. Doppler H, Storz P. Mitochondrial and oxidative stressmediated activation of protein kinase D1 and its importance in pancreatic cancer. Front Oncol. 2017;7(41):1-5.
126. Harikumar KB, Kunnumakkara AB, Ochi N, Tong Z, Deorukhkar A, Sung B, Kelland L, Jamieson S, Sutherland R, Raynham T, Charles M, Bagherzadeh A, Foxton C, Boakes A, Farooq M, Maru D, Diagaradjane P, Matsuo Y, Sinnett-Smith J, Gelovani J, Krishnan S, Aggarwal BB, Rozengurt E, Ireson CR, Guha S. A Novel Small-Molecule Inhibitor of Protein Kinase D Blocks Pancreatic Cancer Growth In vitro and In vivo. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9(5):1136-46.
127. Vigneswaran N, Williams MD. Epidemiological Trends in Head and Neck Cancer and Aids in Diagnosis. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2014;26(2):123-141.
128. Rousseau A, Badoual C. Head and Neck: Squamous cell carcinoma: an overview. Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematolog. 2011;09:Atlas ID 5078.
129. Langendijk JA, Psyrri A. The prognostic significance of p16 overexpression in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: implications for treatment strategies and future clinical studies. Annals of Oncology. 2010; 21(10):1931-4.
130. Hamakawa H, Nakashiro K, Sumida T, Shintani S, Myers JN, Takes RP, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. Basic evidence of molecular targeted therapy for oral cancer and salivary gland cancer. Head Neck 2008;30(6): 800-9.
131. Tamatani T, Azuma M, Motegi K, Takamaru N, Kawashima Y, Bando T. Cepharanthin-enhanced radiosensitivity through the inhibition of radiation-induced nuclear factor-kappaB activity in human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2007;31(4):761-8.
132. Papanikolaou V, Athanassiou E, Dubos S, Dimou I, Papathanasiou I, Kitsiou-Tzeli S, Kappas C, Tsezou A. hTERT regulation by NF-kB and c-myc in irradiated HER2-positive breast cancer cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 2011;87(6):609-21.
133. Soheila N, Shayanfar N, Kani ZA, Younespour S. Incidence of HER 2 membranous expressions in skin basal cell carcinoma in comparison with adjacent normal skin by immunohistochemical method. Razi J Med Sci. 2014;20(115):1-7.
134. Liu B, Zhang H, Li S, Chen W, Li R. The expression of c-erbB-1 and c-erbB-2 oncogenes in basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of skin. Chin Med Sci J. 1996;11(2):106-9.
135. Saenko Y, Cieslar-Pobuda A, Skonieczna M, Rzeszowska-Wolny J. Changes of reactive oxygen and
East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 61 nitrogen species and mitochondrial functioning in human K562 and HL60 cells exposed to ionizing radiation. Radiat Res. 2013;180(4):360-6.
136. Du Q, Zhang X, Cardinal J, Cao Z, Guo Z, Shao L, Geller DA. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling regulates cytokine-induced human inducible nitric oxide synthase expression by inhibiting nuclear factor-kappaB activation in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009;69(9):3764-71.
137. Wang P, Han L, Shen H, Wang P, Lv C, Zhao
G, Niu J, Xue L, Wang QJ, Tong T, Chen J. Protein kinase D1 is essential for Ras-induced senescence and tumor suppression by regulating senescence-associated inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(21):7683-8.
138. Asaithambi A, Kanthasamy A, Saminathan
H, Anantharam V, Kanthasamy AG. Protein kinase D1 (PKD1) activation mediates a compensatory protective response during early stages of oxidative stressinduced neuronal degeneration. Mol Neurodegener. 2011;6:43.
139. Scherbakov AM, Stefanova LB, Sorokin DV, Semina SE, Berstein LM, Krasil'nikov MA. Snail/beta-catenin signaling protects breast cancer cells from hypoxia attack. Exp Cell Res. 2013;319(20):3150-9.
140. Scherbakov AM, Stefanova LB, Yakushina IA, Krasilnikov MA. beta-catenin signaling pathway and the tolerance of breast cancer cells to hypoxic conditions. Klin Lab Diagn. 2013;10:68-70.
141. Bastea LI, Döppler H, Balogun B, Storz P. Protein kinase D1 maintains the epithelial phenotype by inducing a DNA-bound, inactive SNAI1 transcriptional repressor complex. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30459.
142. D'Costa AM, Denning MF. A caspase-resistant mutant of PKC-delta protects keratinocytes from UV-induced apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12(3):224-32.
143. Arun SN, Kaddour-Djebbar I, Shapiro BA, Bollag WB. Ultraviolet B Irradiation and Activation of Protein Kinase D in Primary Mouse Epidermal Keratinocytes. Oncogene. 2011;30(13):1586-96.
144. Bollag WB, Bollag RJ. UV-activation of PKD: implications for skin cancer. Future Oncol. 2011;7(4):485-487.
145. Shin DH, Kim JH, Jung YJ, Kim KE, Jeong JM, Chun YS, Park JW. Preclinical evaluation of YC-
I, a HIF inhibitor, for the prevention of tumor spreading. Cancer Lett. 2007;255(1):107-16.
146. Yang CC, Zhu LF, Xu XH, Ning TY, Ye JH, Liu LK. Membrane Type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase induces an epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell-like properties in SCC9 cells. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:171.
147. Atwood SX, Li M, Lee A, Tang JY, and Oro AE. Gli activation by aPKC iota/lambda regulates basal cell carcinoma growth. Nature. 2013; 494(7438):484-488.
148. Ivanova PV, Maneva AI. Protein Kinase C profiles of normal human epidermal keratinocites, premalignant (inflammatory) skin diseases and skin and HNCancer. Arch Derm Res. 2019; submitted.
149. Gangopadhyay S, Nandy A, Hor P, Mukhopadhyay A. Breast cancer stem cells: a novel therapeutic target. Clin Breast Cancer. 2013; 13(1):7-15.
150. Liu J, Shen JX, Hu JL, Dou XW, Zhang GJ. Role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in invasion and metastasis of breast cancers. OA Cancer. 2013;1(2):16.
151. Wang Y, Zhou BP. Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition--- A Hallmark of Breast Cancer Metastasis. Cancer Hallm. 2013;1(1):38-49.
152. Shen YA, Lin CH, Chi WH, Wang CY, Hsieh YT, Wei YHi, Chen YJ. Resveratrol Impedes the Sternness, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, and Metabolic Reprogramming of Cancer Stem Cells in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma through p53 Activation. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2013;2013:Article ID 590393.
153. Singh T, Katiyar SK. Green Tea Catechins Reduce Invasive Potential of Human Melanoma Cells by Targeting COX-2, PGE2 Receptors and Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition. PLoS One 2011;6(10):e25224.
154. Zlotogorski A, Dayan A, Dayan D, Chaushu G, Salo T, Vered M. Nutraceuticals as new treatment approaches for oral cancer: II. Green tea extracts and resveratrol. Oral Oncol. 2013;49(6):502-6.
155. Tomé-Carneiro J, Larrosa M, González-Sarrias A, Tomás-Barberán FA, Garcia-Conesa MT, Espin JC. Resveratrol and Clinical Trials: The Crossroad from In Vitro Studies to Human Evidence. Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19(34):6064-93.
156. Kundu JK, Na HK, Chun KS, Kim YK, Lee SJ, Lee SS, Lee OS, Sim YC, Surh YJ. Inhibition of phorbol ester-induced COX-2 expression by epigallocatechin gallate in mouse skin and cultured human mammary epithelial cells. J Nutr. 2003;133(11(1)):3805S-3810S.
157. Guang PV, Dixon DA, Smith TJ, Wargovich MJ. Effect of green tea polyphenol EGCG on COX-2 expression in human colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2005;46:1230.
158. Ogmundsdóttir HM, Hilmarsdóttir H, Astvaldsdóttir A, Jóhannsson JH, Holbrook WP. Oral lichen planus has a high rate of TP53 mutations. A study of oral mucosa in icelanD. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110(3):192-8.
159. Ries JC, Schreiner D, Steininger H, Girod SC. p53 mutation and detection of p53 protein expression in oral leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 1998;18(3B):2031-6.
160. Ortonne JP. From actinic keratosis to squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146(61):20-3.
161. Soufir N, Moles JP, Vilmer C, Moch C, Verola O, Rivet J, Tesniere A, Dubertret L and Basset-Seguin N. P16 UV mutations in human skin epithelial tumours. Oncogene. 1999;18(39):5477-81.
162. Qin GZ, Park JY, Chen SY, Lazarus P. A high prevalence of p53 mutations in pre-malignant oral erythroplakia. Int J Cancer. 1999;80(3):345-8.
MB
BtSgSB
163. Storz P. Protein kinase D1: gatekeeper of the epithelial phenotype and key regulator of cancer metastasis? Br J Cancer. 2018;118(4):459-461.
164. Kivisaari A. Molecular markers for progression of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the skin. University of Turku, 2011.
165. Impola U, Uitto VJ, Hietanen J, Hakkinen L, Zhang L, Larjava H, Isaka K, Saarialho-Kere U. Differential expression of matrilysin-1 (MMP-7), 92 kD gelatinase (MMP-9), and metalloelastase (MMP-12) in oral verrucous and squamous cell cancer. J Pathol. 2004;202(1):14-22.
166. Impola U, Jeskanen L, Ravanti L, Syrjänen S, Baldursson B, Kähäri VM, Saarialho-Kere U. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-7 and MMP-13 and loss of MMP-19 and p16 are associated with malignant progression in chronic wounds. Br J Dermatol. 2005;152(4):720-6.
167. Radisky ES, Radisky DC. Matrix Metalloproteinase-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Breast Cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2010;15(2):201-12.
168. Sabeh F, Ota I, Holmbeck K, BirkedalHansen H, Soloway P, Balbin M, Lopez-Otin C, Shapiro S, Inada M, Krane S, Allen E, Chung D, Weiss SJ. Tumor cell traffic through the extracellular matrix is controlled by the membrane-anchored collagenase MT1-MMP. J Cell Biol. 2004; 167(4):769-81.
169. Sounni NE, Devy L, Hajitou A, Frankenne F, Munaut C, Gilles C, Deroanne C, Thompson EW, Foidart JM, Noel A. MT1-MMP expression promotes tumor growth and angiogenesis through an up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression. FASEB J. 2002;16(6):555-64.
170. Pittayapruek P, Meephansan J, Prapapan O, Komin M, Ohtsuki M. Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Photoaging and Photocarcinogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:868.
171. Vanjaka-Rogosic L, Puizina-Ivic N, Miric L, Rogosic V, Kuzmic-Prusac I, Babic MS, Vukovic D, Mardesic S. Matrix metalloproteinases and E-cadherin immunoreactivity in different basal cell carcinoma histological types. Acta Histochem. 2014; 116(5):688-93.
172. Eiseler T, Döppler H, Yan IK, Goodison S, Storz P. Protein kinase D1 regulates matrix metalloproteinase expression and inhibits breast cancer cell invasion. Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11(1):R13.
173. Du C, Jaggi M, Zhang C, Balaji KC. Protein Kinase D1-Mediated Phosphorylation and Subcellular Localization of beta-catenin. Cancer Res. 2009;69(3):1117-24.
174. Du C, Zhang C, Li Z, Biswas MH, Balaji KC. Beta-Catenin Phosphorylated at Threonine 120 Antagonizes Generation of Active Beta-Catenin by Spatial Localization in trans-Golgi Network. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e33830.
175. Liu LK, Jiang XY, Zhou XX, Wang DM, Song XL, Jiang HB. Upregulation of vimentin and aberrant expression of E-cadherin/beta-catenin complex in oral squamous cell carcinomas: correlation
UB
BBSjJB
with the clinicopathological features and patient outcome. Mod Pathol. 2010;23(2):213-24.
176. Weinreb I, Piscuoglio S, Martelotto LG, Waggott D, Ng CK, Perez-Ordonez B et al. Hotspot activating PRKD1 somatic mutations in polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinomas of the salivary glands. Nat Genet. 2014;46(11):1166-9.
177. Fountzilas E, Kotoula V, Angouridakis N, Karasmanis I, Wirtz RM, Eleftheraki AG, Veltrup E, Markou K, Nikolaou A, Pectasides D, Fountzilas G. Identification and validation of a multigene predictor of recurrence in primary laryngeal cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e70429.
178. Choudhary V, Olala LO, Kaddour-Djebbar I, Helwa I, Bollag WB. Protein kinase D1 deficiency promotes differentiation in epidermal keratinocytes. J Dermatol Sci. 2014;76(3):186-195.
179. Lee B, Dai X. Transcriptional Control of Epidermal Stem Cells. Adv Exp Med Biol 2013;786:157-73.
180. Du F, Nakamura Y, Tan TL, Lee P, Lee R, Yu B, Jamora C. Expression of Snail in Epidermal Keratinocytes Promotes Cutaneous Inflammation and Hyperplasia Conducive to Tumor Formation. Cancer Res. 2010;70(24):10080-9.
181. De Craene B, Denecker G, Vermassen P, Taminau J, Mauch C, Derore A, Jonkers J, Fuchs E, Berx G. Epidermal Snail expression drives skin cancer initiation and progression through enhanced cytoprotection, epidermal stem/progenitor cell expansion and enhanced metastatic potential. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21(2):310-20.
182. Li Y, Liu Y, Xu Y, Voorhees JJ, Fisher GJ. UV irradiation induces Snail expression by AP-1 dependent mechanism in human skin keratinocytes. J Dermatol Sci. 2010;60(2):105-13.
183. Merzoug-Larabi M, Spasojevic C, Eymard M, Hugonin C, Auclair C, Karam M. Protein kinase C inhibitor Gö6976 but not Gö6983 induces the reversion of E- to N-cadherin switch and metastatic phenotype in melanoma: identification of the role of protein kinase D1. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):12.
184. Ivanova PV, Dimov I. 1a,25(OH)2Ds and VDR in inflammation and cancer in keratinocytes (additional remarks). Bulgarian medicine. 2019;9(1):17-34.
185. Durand N, Bastea LI, Long J, Doppler H, Ling K, Storz P. Protein kinase D1 regulates focal adhesion dynamics and cell adhesion through phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase type-l y. Sci Rep. 2016;24(6):35963.
186. Hirai T, Chida K. Protein kinase CZ (PKCQ: activation mechanisms and cellular functions. J Biochem. 2003;133:1-7.
187. Chen Y, Zhang J, Ge X, Du J, Deb DK, Li YC. Vitamin D receptor inhibits nuclear factor kB activation by interacting with IkB kinase ß protein. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(27):19450-19458.
188. Udager AM, McHugh JB, Betz BL, Montone KT, Livolsi VA, Seethala RR, Yakirevich E, Iwenofu OH, Perez-Ordonez B, DuRoss KE, Weigelin HC, Lim MS, Elenitoba-Johnson KS, Brown NA. () Activating
East European Scientific Journal #4(68), 2021 63 KRAS mutations are characteristic of oncocytic sinonasal papilloma and associated sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma. J Pathol. 2016;239(4):394-8.
189. Bonifas JM, Pennypacker S, Chuang PT, McMahon AP, Williams M, Rosenthal A, De Sauvage FJ, Epstein EH Jr. Activation of Expression of Hedgehog Target Genes in Basal Cell Carcinomas. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;16(5):739-42.
190. Yamakoshi K, Takahashi A, Hirota F, Nakayama R, Ishimaru N, Kubo Y, Mann DJ, Ohmura M, Hirao A, Saya H, Arase S, Hayashi Y, Nakao K, Matsumoto M, Ohtani N, Hara E. Real-time in vivo imaging of p16Ink4a reveals crosstalk with p53. J Cell Biol. 2009;186(3):393-407.
191. Nilsson M, Unden AB, Krause D, Malmqwist U, Raza K, Zaphiropoulos PG, Toftgärd R. Induction of basal cell carcinomas and trichoepitheliomas in mice overexpressing GLI-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci US A. 2000;97(7):3438-3443.
192. Terayama Y, Matsuura T, Ozaki K. Lack of Correlation between Aberrant p16, RAR-ß2, TIMP3, ERCC1, and BRCA1 Protein Expression and Promoter Methylation in Squamous Cell Carcinoma Accompanying Candida albicans-Induced Inflammation. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159090.
193. Stephen JK, Chen KM, Shah V, Schweitzer VG, Gardner G, Benninger MS, Worsham MJ. Consistent DNA hypermethylation patterns in laryngeal papillomas. Int J Head Neck Surg. 2010; 1(2): 69-77.
194. Kuivanen TT, Jeskanen L, Kyllönen L, Impola U, Saarialho-Kere UK. Transformation-specific matrix metalloproteinases, MMP-7 and MMP-13, are present in epithelial cells of keratoacanthomas. Mod Pathol. 2006;19(9):1203-12.
195. Lim YH, Fisher JM, Bosenberg MW, Choate KA. Keratoacanthoma Shares Driver Mutations with Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(8): 1737-1741.
196. Roh MR, Kim JH, Lee SH, Oh SJ, Park KH, Chung KY, Rha SY. Prevalence of human papillomavirus infection and RAS mutation in sporadic keratoacanthoma. Int J Dermatol. 2015;54(11):e453-7.
197. McCord C, Xu J, Xu W, Qiu X, Muhanna N, Irish J, Leong I, McComb RJ, Perez-Ordonez B, Bradley G. Association of human papilloma virus with atypical and malignant oral papillary lesions. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol and Oral Radiol. 2014;117(6):722-732.
198.Hodges A, Smoller BR. Immunohistochemical comparison of p16 expression in actinic keratoses and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin. Mod Pathol. 2002;15(11):1121-5.
199. Toll A, Salgado R, Yébenes M, Martín-Ezquerra G, Gilaberte M, Baró T, Solé F, Alameda F, Espinet B, Pujol RM. MYC gene numerical aberrations in actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161(5):1112-8.
200. Ishida H, Kumakiri M, Ueda K, Lao LM, Yanagihara M, Asamoto K, Imamura Y, Noriki S and Fukuda M. Comparative histochemical study of Bowen's disease and actinic keratosis: preserved
normal basal cells in Bowen's disease. Eur. J. Histochem. 2001; 45:177-190.
201. Reichart PA, Philipsen HP. Oral erythroplakia—a review. Oral Oncol. 2005, 41:551-561.
202. Tilakaratne WM, Kobayashi T, Ida-Yonemochi H, Swelam W, Yamazaki M, Mikami T, Alvarado CG, Shahidul AM, Maruyama S, Cheng J, Saku T. Matrix metalloproteinase 7 and perlecan in oral epithelial dysplasia and carcinoma in situ: an aid for histopathologic recognition of their cell proliferation centers. J Oral Pathol Med. 2009;38(4):348-55.
203. Dlugosz AA, Mischak H, Mushinski JF, Yuspa SH. Transcripts encoding protein kinase C-
alpha, -delta, -epsilon, -zeta, and -eta are expressed in basal and differentiating mouse keratinocytes in vitro and exhibit quantitative changes in neoplastic cells. Mol Carcinog. 1992;5(4):286-92.
204. Vorechovsky I, Undén AB, Sandstedt B, Toftgârd R, Stâhle-Bâckdahl M. Trichoepitheliomas contain somatic mutations in the overexpressed PTCH gene: support for a gatekeeper mechanism in skin tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 1997;57(21):4677-81.
205. Dreyfus I, Onnis G, Tournier E, Dereure O, Mazereeuw-Hautier J. Effect of Topical Rapamycin 1% on Multiple Trichoepitheliomas. ActaDV 2019;99: 454-455.
Table 1
Oral (A) and skin (B) Premalignant Diseases (PMDs) (images of Trtichoepithelioma and oral papilloma in webpathology atlas).
A: Oral Premalignant Diseases_
Hyperplast ic and dysplastic oral lesions
Oral Lichen Planus
Wickham's Striae in the reticular form.
https://www.aaom.com/oral-lichen-planus_
Oral Leukoplakia
Leukoplakia on the inside of the cheek.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leuk oplakia_
Oral Erythroplakia
Erythroplakia on the soft palate in a 62-year-old male.1
The gold standard for the
assessment of oral potentially malignant lesions is microscopic evaluation of
haematoxyli n and eosin stained sections for the
presence of architectura l and
cytological changes, which are generally referred to as epithelial dysplasia. Some texts use the
Oral lichen planus (OLP) is an chronical inflammatory condition that affects mucous membranes inside the mouth. Oral lichen planus may appear as white, lacy patches; red, swollen tissues; or open sores. These lesions may cause burning, pain or other discomfort. Autoimmune disorder
(https://www.mayoclinic.org/d iseases-conditions/oral-lichen-planus/symptoms-causes/syc-20350869).
WHO "white plaques of questionable risk having excluded (other) known diseases or disorders that carry no risk for cancer". Leukoplakias are commonly homogeneous and most are benign (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leuk oplakia).
erythroplakia is much less common than leukoplakia, erythroplakia carries a significantly higher risk of containing dysplasia or carcinoma in situ, and of eventually transforming into invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Carcinoma is found in almost 40% of erythroplakia, it is mostly found in elderly men around the ages of 65 - 74. It is commonly associated with smoking
(https://en.wikipedia.o
rg).201
IJ«
Its®]«
terms squamous intraepitheli al neoplasia (SIN) or squamous intraepitheli al lesions. In the oral cavity, use of the SIL (squamous intraepitheli al lesions) terminology of 'atypical hyperplasia' may lead to confusion because of the large number of common benign hyperplastic lesions, which may be
encountered . In oral and maxillofaci al
pathology therefore,
oral
epithelial dysplasia is regarded as the standard
terminology
202
B: Skin Premalignant Diseases
Chronic wounds
Actinic keratose (AK)
Keratoacanthomas (KA)
Bowen's disease
Wound that does not heal in an orderly
Actinic keratosis seen on the back of the hands https://en.wikipedia.org/w iki/Actinic keratosis
1. Keratoacanthoma https ://en.wikipedia. org/wi ki/Keratoacanthoma
Bowen's disease as seen on a finger
https ://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Bo wen%27s disease
Actinic keratosis (AK) usually presents as multiple, erythematous
Keratoacanthoma (KA) is a common low-grade (unlikely to metastasize or
Bowen disease was first described in the medical literature by a physician named
set of stages and in a predictable amount of time the way most wounds do; wounds that do not heal within three months are often considered chronic (https://en.wik ipedia.org).
or yellow brown, dry, scaly lesions in the sun-exposed areas of the body. It is a lesion of the middle-aged and elderly individuals with a male predominance. It is especially more common in those with fair complexions who burn (rather than tan) upon sun exposure. The usual sites of involvement are face, trunk, and the dorsal surfaces of the hands and forearms. The lesions may coexist with lentigo maligna. The surrounding skin shows additional evidence of sun damage, including
atrophy, hypo- or hyperpigmentation, and telangiectasia. AK is an indicator of exposure to UV light and predicts the risk of developing squamous cell carcinoma
(webpathology atlas). Intraepidermal squamous cell carcinomas with potential progression to invasive squamous cell carcinoma200 Hypertrophic, atrophic, bowenoid, acantholytic, and pigmented, based on histopathological
examination200
invade) rapidly-growing skin tumour, with an annual incidence of approximately 150 per 100,000, occurring mostly on sun-exposed areas in fair-skinned patients aged 50 years and older. It is believed to originate from the hair follicle (pilosebaceous unit) and can resemble squamous cell carcinoma. It is dome-shaped, symmetrical, surrounded by a smooth wall of inflamed skin, and capped with keratin scales and debris. It grows rapidly, reaching a large size within days or weeks, pinkish red, dome-shaped papulonodules measuring 1-2 cm in diameter, and if untreated for months will almost always starve itself of nourishment, necrose (die), slough, and heal with scarring, spontaneously regressing within 6-8 months. Keratoacanthoma is commonly found on sun-exposed skin, often face, forearms and hands. It is rarely found at a mucocutaneous junction or on mucous membranes (https ://en.wikipedia. org/wi ki/Keratoacanthoma). Originally described as a benign tumor mimicking cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), KA is difficult to distinguish from cSCC during its growth, because both show rapid expansion, atypical keratinocyte morphology, and perineural invasion. The regressing phase of KA is histologically distinct.195
JT Bowen in 1912. Bowen disease is also known as squamous cell carcinoma in situ, and is generally considered an early, noninvasive form of intraepidermal squamous cell
carcinoma. 200
(https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/bowen-disease/)
Bowen's disease is the clinical term for a particular precancerous skin lesion. These lesions rarely cause patients any symptoms, but appear as well-defined scaly patches on sun-exposed skin, commonly in those over 60 years. They occur more in women and most frequently involve the lower legs of those affected in the UK. It is not known why, but the body sites most commonly affected vary across different countries. In general, people with Bowen's disease have an excellent prognosis because the disease is typically slow to develop and responds favourably to treatment. Lesions are usually slow-growing, and although they are not life-threatening, there is a small risk of progression to a skin cancer (estimated to be 3%) known as invasive squamous cell carcinoma.
(https ://www.cochrane.org/CD0 07281/SKIN treatments-cutaneous-bowens-disease)
An early change in benign neoplastic transformation of keratinocytes is the inability to differentiate in response to Ca2+ or the PKC activator 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA), which is consistent with altered PKCa function in these cells.203,148 There is no data for early PKCa mutations (methylation) in PMDs.42,148 There is data for the
increased expression and activity of PKD1 only in mouse model of papillomas97, among PMDs (downregulated in 87% of HNSCC71), psoriasis and BCC.70 95 There are no studies of PKD2 (PKD3) expression of PMDs, although it is possible that PKD2 plays a predominant role in the growth, survival, and motility of HNSCC cells7195, nor in BCC.95
Table 2
Detected mutations in Premalignant Diseases (PMDs) and benign tumour _ (p16INK4a, Ras, NF-kB, GLI, TP53, HPV DNA).__
First mutation in: Genes: Premalignant Diseases (PMDs): Other mutations: Cancer:
Classical PMDs
CDKN2A Oral leukoplakia lesions (hypermethylation in 44% , in 76% of oSCCs)2 Xeroderma pigmentosum33 Aberrant p16 expression (nuclear p16 oversxprsssion despite increases in p16 gene promoter methylation) during inflammatory carcinogenesis caused by Candida albicans infection193 higher p16 expression in papillomas190197 and Actinic keratosis198199 44 (lack - DD. HPV(-) SCC) Promoter hypermethylation of CDKN2B and T1MP3 was most frequent, of BRCA2, APC, CDKN2A and CDKN2B was TP53 (79%) HRAS (35%) EGFRvIII (42%) TERT (50%) NOTCH1 (14-15%) PIK3CA (3.9- 16.1%)11 SCC
p16INK4a detected in 2 RRP laryngeal papilloma cases including recurrences, with subsequent progression to SCC. Of the 25 cases, 22 were positive for HPV-6, 2 for HPV-11 and 1 for HPV-16 and 33 in respiratory papillomatosis.194 Loss of MMP-19 and p16 (negative in the invasive areas) from the epithelium could aid in making the differential diagnosis between well- differentiated SCCs and nonmalignant chronic leg wounds (lack of MMP-7. (MMP-12) MMP- SCC
13 in chronic wounds)166 Between well-differentiated SCC TP53 NOTCH1-2 (22% of SCC)
and keratoacanthoma (lack of MMP-8, presence of MMP-7 and -9 PIK3CA HRAS
in their epithelial pushing border -SCC) 194 CDKN2A FBXW7195
Benign tumours
Ras Ras Actinic (solar) keratosis (16%) (H- Ras, N-Ras) 26,27J1, Papillomas190,44 Keratoacanthoma (28.6%)196 SFN (14-3-3G) TP53 (79%) CDKN2A (58% in HPV(-)) EGFRvIII (42%) TERT (50%) NOTCH1 (14-15%) PIK3CA (3.9- 16.1%)11 BCC SCC
nf-kb NFKB Psoriasis (CARD14 mutation -epidermal regulator of NF-kB86)
Benign tumours
GLI Gli Trichoepithelioma (TEs) (PTCH204, CYLD205 mutation), Cylindromas, Trichoblastomas 191,44 SFN(14-3-3 g) (68.3%) Ras (10-50%) TP53 (38-66%) TERT (56-78%)" BCC
p53 TP53 Erythroplakia (46%), Oral lichen planus (33%), SCC
Leucoplakia (13.3%) Actinic (solar) keratosis (rare) 162,158,159,160
HPV DNA Papillomas Keratoacanthoma (28.6%)*,196 p16INK4apositivity 90, 8,129,118 11 SCC^27,116,92,8,128,11 bcc10,11
*RAS oncogene activation and HPV infection seem to represent two independent factors in the development of KA.196
