CC BY
14
Научни трудове на Съюза на учените в България-Пловдив. Серия Г. Медицина, фармация и дентална медицина т. XXII. ISSN 1311-9427 (Print), ISSN 2534-9392 (On-line). 2017. Scientific works of the Union of Scientists in Bulgaria-Plovdiv, series G. Medicine, Pharmacy and Dental medicine, VoLXXII. ISSN 13119427 (Print), ISSN 2534-9392 (On-line). 2018.
ENTERO-ATMOSPHERIC FISTULAS AS COMPLICATION OF
LAPAROSTOMY
Sakakushev Boris, Chakarov Djevdet, A.tanasov Bojko, Hadzhiev Dimitar, Hadzhieva Elena Medical University Plov^v/Urnversky Hospital Sit George
ABSTRACT
Entero- atmospheric fistula is a lethal complication following abdominal surgery, with non-standardized management, relying either on self-experience or several published case series. Although principles of management are almost defined, technical performance methods and consumptives for stoma and wound protection are so numerous, that may cause primary confusion of a novice. Treatment is long and with obscure outcome and prognosis.
KEY WORDS: EAF/Entero-atmo spheric fistula/, OA/Open abdomen/, VAC/Vacuum assisted closure/, ACS/Abdominal compartment syndrome/.
INTRODUCTION
Entero-atmospheric fistula is a grave complication following abdominal surgery. The numerous methods to treat EAF and the many reviews published on the topic indicate a great deal of inconsistency in management of this complication. EAF fistula remains a considerable source of morbidity and mortality despite advances in nutritional support, infection control and surgical techniques. The discussion of EAF is still in its early stage (in the non- trauma setting). Personal experience, expert opinion, case studies and retrospective studies form the core basis for our current knowledge. No based guidelines exist (in regard to EAF management). Publications related to EAF in emergency surgery in the period 2011 - 2016 are 12, reviews of which have been 8. RESULTS
After a detailed search of the available literature on PubMed and Embase, we found out that currently the most discussed questions concerning EAF are their definition, classification, developmental risk factors, patients' nutritional demands & supplements, means of effluent isolation and wound management and time for definitive repair (abdominal wall). EAF is defined as an enteric opening(s) onto a dehisced wound therefore exposing and communicating the bowel and its effluent to the atmosphere. The OA management strategy increases this complication incidence if preventive measures are untaken. According to Lynch A & alt. Fistula is an abnormal passage between two or more (epithelized) structures or spaces/1/. An Enteric fistula- a fistula that communicates specifically between the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract and the skin (most common), while Non-enteric fistula- an abnormal passage from a body cavity to an organ other than the intestines. Unexposed fistula- extends in an unknown direction and has an unknown endpoint, while exposed fistula- endpoint of the fistula evident.
EAF is not a true fistula as no fistula tract exists. Some of the management practices of ECF are valid in controlling EAF, such as the attempt at spillage control and the attempt to seal the fistula. DISCUSSION
In average 75-85% of the cases EAF are iatrogenic post-operative and in 15-25% "spontaneous" in origin. Common factors related to this postoperative misfortune are radiation, inflammatory bowel disease, diverticular disease, malignancy and tuberculosis /2/. The EAF incidence is 5-15%
of trauma, 20% of operations for abdominal sepsis and 50% of operations for pancreatic necrosis with a Mortality of 30-40%/3/. EAF cause increased ICU and hospital loss, and raised expenditures/4/. The reported rate of spontaneous healing of EAF is 70% /2,5/.Current classification schemes echo the problematic and challenging issues related to the management of EAF which should be personalized according to standard classifications and grading systems. The anatomical, physiological, clinical classification of OA with EAF has been updated in 2016, where a rationalized approach to this surgical nightmare and proposal of clinical algorithm has been presented/6/. Future- dynamic classification will be based on scoring anatomical+ physiological+ clinical variables.
Diverse clinical circumstances may contribute to the development of EAF and few risk factors may predict its development, therefore awareness of this complication and avoidance of contributing conditions for its development are mandatory. Predictors of EAF are large bowel resections, large-volume fluid resuscitation (> 5-10lit/24h) and increased number of abdominal re-explorations/7/.
The etiology of EAF is related to anastomotic disruption, bowel injury due to dissection or inproper handling, use of temporary abdominal closure (synthetic mesh), deep wound infection, burst abdomen, prolonged exposed bowel, intra-abdominal sepsis and ACS/8/. Common sites of EAF are colon - 69%, small bowel- 53%, duodenum- 36%, stomach- 19%, where multiple openings are to be found in 56%/2/. Preemptive measures require sound judgment and implementation of some practical maneuvers like skin or biological dressing/9/, early abdominal wall closure, highly experienced surgeon/team deal with OA, no direct VAC on bowel, which lead to a 7% fistula rate/10-13 /.
The metabolic disturbances in EAF are hyperactabolic state with high nutritional demands (protein losing laprostomy), fluid and electrolytes losses and acid- base homeostasis disturbances. These higher nutritional demands require nutritional supplements for proper healing like positive nitrogen balance, adequate trace elements and vitamins supplements /14/. EAF require proper antibiotics and drainage of collection/15/. Separating the wound into different compartments in order to facilitate the collection and perifistular skin protection is of paramount importance, as well as reducing fistula output/ 16,17/. Many fistula management techniques are described/ baby bottle nipple + VAC, floating stoma, tube, fistula, chimney VAC, primary suturing, fibrin glue, pedicle flap (to cover), fistula plug, patch, suspension/, as well as many methods for wound care exist /19,20/. In the presence of EAF in OA, NPWT makes effluent isolation feasible and wound healing conceivable/21-26/. Definitive management of EAF should be delayed to after the patient has recovered and the wound healed/27/. Local therapy relies on two approaches - surgical/suture, resection/ and non-surgical/ drainage via catheter, fistula-VAC, wound dressing, pacifier, laparostomy bag. CONCLUSION
EAF management scheme should include preventing risk factors, nutritional support, sepsis control, isolation and fluid control, manage fistula and reconstruct abdominal wall all performed in a stepwise approach.
References
1. Lynch A. & alt. Clinical outcome and factors predictive of recurrence after enterocutaneous fistula surgery. Ann Surg;240: 835, 2004
2. Bobkiewicz A., & alt. Management of enteroatmospheric fistula with negative pressure wound therapy in open abdomen treatment:a multicenter study.InWound J.Doi10.1111/iwj12597, 2016
3. Atema J, & alt. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients. 2014 World J Surg; 912, 5
4. Teixeira P. & alt. entero-atmospheric fistula complicating trauma laparotomy: a major resource burden. Am Surg; 75: 30-2, 2009
5. Gunn L. & alt. Management of entero-cutaneous fistulas using negative-pressure dressings. Ann Plast Surg ;57:621-5, 2006
6. Di Saverio S. & alt. Open abdomen with concomitant EAF: attempts to rationalize the approach to surgical nightmare and proposal of clinical algorithm. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 e23-33
7. Bradley M. & alt. Independent predictors of enteric fistula and abdominal sepsis after damage control laparotomy: results from the prospective AAST open abdomen registry. JAMA Surg 2013; 148:947-954
8. Richter S. & alt. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for the Treatment of the Open Abdomen and Incidence of Enteral Fistulas: A Retrospective Bicentre Analysis. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2013:730829. doi:10.1155/2013/730829
9. Schechter W. & alt. Open abdomen after trauma abdominal sepsis: a strategy for management. J Am Coll. S2006;203:390-396
10. Jamshidi R, Schechter W. Biological dressing for management of fistula in the open abdomen- a preliminary report. Arch Surg 2007; 142: 793
11. Cheatham M. & alt. Prospective study examining clinical outcomes associated with a NWP system and Barkers vacuum packing technique. World J Surg 2013; 37:2018-2030
12. Carlson G. & alt. Management of the open abdomen: a national study of clinical outcome and safety of negative pressure wound therapy. Ann Surg. 2013;257,1144- 59
13. Miller R. & alt. Complications after 344 damage-control open celiotomies. Journal Trauma: Injury, Inf. Critical Care 59:1365-71, 2005. Discussion 71-4. 11.
14. Polk T. & alt. Metabolic and nutritional support of the enterocutaneous fistula- a three phase approach. World J Surg 2012; 36:524-533
15. Gerzof G. & alt. Percutaneous catheter drainage of abdominal abscess guided ultrasound and computerized tomography. Am J Ro. 1979; 133.-8
16. Marinis A. & alt. Enteroatmospheric fistula- gastrointestinal in the open abdomen: a review and recent proposal of surgical technique. 2013, Scand J Surg; 102, 61-65
17. Adkins A. & alt. Open abdomen management of intra-abdominal sepsis. 2004, American Surgeon.;70(2):137-140
18. Navsaria P. & alt. Temporary closure of open abdominal wounds by the modified sandwich vacuum pack technique. Br J Surg ;90:71, 2003
19. Al-Khoury G. & alt. Improved control of exposed fistula in the open abdomen. J Am Coll Surg ; 206:397, 2003
20. Layton B. & alt. Pacifying the open abdomen with concomitant intestinalf istula: a novel approach. Am J S. 199:, 2010
21. Rekstad L. & alt. Topical negative-pressure therapy for smal lbowel leakage in a frozen abdomen. J Tr. Ac. Care Surg ;75:487, 2013
22. Timmons J. & alt. The use of negative-pressure wound therapy to manage etneroatmospheric fistulae in two patients with large abdominal wounds. Int Wound J; 11: 7239.
23. D'Hondt M, & alt. Treatment of small-bowel fistulae in the open abdomen with topical negative-pressure therapy. Am J Surg ;202:20-4, 2011
24. Goverman J. & alt. The "fistula VAC," a technique for management of EAC arising within the open abdomen: report of 5 cases. J Trauma; 60:428-31, 2006.
25. Al-Khoury G. & alt. Improved control of exposed fistula in the open abdomen. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206:397e398.
26. Chiara, S & alt. International consensus conference on open abdomen in trauma. J Trauma Ac Care. 80; 173- 83, 2015
27. Latifi R. & alt. Enterocutaneous fistulas and a hostile abdomen: reoperative surgical approach. World J Surg. 36; 516-23, 2012
