CC BY
64
Received: 20 June 2020 / / Accepted: 15 July 2020 / Published online: 31 August 2020
DOI 10.34689/SH.2020.22.4.001 UDC 613.863
EMOTIONAL REACTIONS AND COPING STRATEGIES OF MEDICAL STUDENTS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: AN ONLINE CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Mariya Prilutskaya1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9099-316X Tokzhan Mendualieva1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1665-3332 Ornella Corazza2 3, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7371-319X
1 Pavlodar Branch of Semey Medical University, Department of personalized medicine and pediatrics, Pavlodar, Republic of Kazakhstan;
2 University of Hertfordshire, School of Life and Medical Science, Hatfield, United Kingdom;
3 Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences, Italy.
Abstract
Introduction: The coronavirus infection (COVID-19) poses a concern for medical professionals. While attention has been given to front-line clinicians, very little is known about the impact of the pandemic on the health of medical students.
Aim: The study aims at assessment of emotional reactions and basic feelings in association with specific coping strategies among a sample of medical university students in Kazakhstan during the COVID-19.
Material and methods: A cross-sectional self-administered survey was undertaken in 279 students of Semey Medical University. Measurement tools included the visual-analog scales (VAS) for the evaluation of the basic emotions/feelings and coping behaviours and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to detect potential signs of depression and anxiety. Data comparisons were provided using the ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Logistic regressions with odds ratio (OR) calculation were used to identify those demographic characteristics and coping activities that were related to depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 quarantine.
Results: Overall, 17.6% of the respondents had symptoms of anxiety and 30.0% experienced depression, while 3.6% reported intense fear, 5.7% anger, 9.3% boredom, and 5.7% disappointment. The mean of the anxiety score was significantly higher among undergraduate students (p=0.019) and residents trianees (р=0.035). While undergraduate students and interns were more likely to engage in physical activities (p=0.020), write diaries (p=0.029), and play videogames (p=0.008), residents and postgraduate students engaged more with clinical activities as a coping mechanism to reduce stress (p=0.006). The odds of having anxiety symptoms were 1.56 times higher for those who reported active blogging in social media during the lockdown. In contrast, self-education was inversely related to the presence of anxiety symptoms (OR = 0.73). For depressive symptoms, age (OR=0.88), focusing on self-education (OR=0.68) and television watching (OR=0.76) were the alleviating factors in the multivariate regression model. Individuals using alcohol were 1.65 times more likely to develop depression.
Conclusions: The study provides the first insights into the emotional reactions and the coping strategies adopted by Kazakhstani medical students during the COVID-19 quarantine. Findings will inform future preventative efforts to safeguard their health, especially during challenging times.
Key words: quarantine, COVID-19, depression, anxiety, coping.
Резюме
ЭМОЦИОНАЛЬНОЕ РЕАГИРОВАНИЕ И КОПИНГ-СТРАТЕГИИ СРЕДИ СТУДЕНТОВ-МЕДИКОВ ВО ВРЕМЯ ПАНДЕМИИ КОРОНАВИРУСНОЙ ИНФЕКЦИИ: ПОПЕРЕЧНОЕ ОНЛАЙН ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ
Мария В. Прилуцкая1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9099-316X Токжан Т. Мендуалиева1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1665-3332 Орнелла Корацца23, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7371-319X
1 Павлодарский филиал НАО «Медицинский университет Семей», Кафедра персонализированной медицины и педиатрии, Павлодар, Республика Казахстан;
2 Университет Хартфордшира, Школа Жизни и Медицинских наук, Хатфилд, Великобритания;
3 «Сапиенца» - Римский Университет, Департамент медико-хирургических наук, Рим, Италия.
Введение: Коронавирусная инфекция (СOVID-19) является поводом для значительной озабоченности среди медицинской общественности. В то время, как большая часть внимания уделяется клиницистам, работающим на передовой эпидемии, очень ограниченные данные доступны о влиянии пандемии на здоровье студентов-медиков.
Цель: Данное исследование направлено на оценку эмоциональных реакций и базовых чувств в ассоциации с определенными копинг-стратегиями среди выборки студентов медицинского университета Казахстана в условиях социальных ограничений по COVID-19.
Материалы и методы: Поперечный опрос был проведен среди 279 студентов НАО «Медицинский университет Семей». Оценочные инструменты включали в себя визуально-аналоговые шкалы для измерения базовых эмоций/чувств и копинговых действий, а также Госпитальную Шкалу оценки тревоги и депрессии. Сравнение данных проведено с помощью однофакторного дисперсионного анализа и теста Крускала-Уоллиса. Логистическая регрессия с расчетом отношения шансов (ОШ) использована для определения демографических характеристик и копингов, которые были связаны с депрессией и тревогой в условиях карантина по COVID-19
Результаты: В общем, 17,6% респондентов имели тревожные симптомы, 30,0% переживали депрессию, 3,6% сообщали о значительном страхе, 5,7% - о гневе, 9,3% - о скуке, 5,7% - о разочаровании. Средний уровень баллов по шкале депрессии был значительно выше среди студентов-бакалавров ^=0,019) и резидентов (р=0,035). Студенты программ бакалавриата и интерны чаще сообщали, что занимаются спортом ^=0,020), ведут дневники ^=0,029), играют в видеоигры ^=0,008), чтобы справиться со стрессом. В то же время учащиеся резидентуры, магистратуры и докторантуры справлялись со стрессом, состредоточившись на клинической деятельности ^=0,006). Шансы обнаружения тревожных растройств были в 1,56 раз выше среди тех учащихся, кто активно занимался написанием онлайн блогов. Напротив, самообразование демонстрировало обратную связь с симптомам тревоги (ОШ=0,73). Для депрессии, возраст (0Ш=0,88), сосредоточенность на самообразовании (0Ш=0,68) и просмотр телевизионных передач и фильмов (0Ш=0,76) были факторами защиты в регрессионной модели. Шанс развития депрессии при употреблении алкоголя возрастал в 1,65 раз.
Выводы: Данное исследование способствует первичному пониманию в отношении эмоционального реагирования и копинг-стратегий среди казахстанских студентов-медиков в условиях COVID-19. Находки исследования могут быть использованы для обоснования превентивных усилий для защиты здоровья учащихся, особенно в условиях значительных вызовов.
Ключевые слова: карантин, СОЧЮ-19, депрессия, тревога, копинг.
Туйшдеме
КОРОНАВИРУСТЫКК ИНФЕКЦИЯ ПАНДЕМИЯСЫ КЕЗ1НДЕГ1 МЕДИЦИНА СТУДЕНТТЕР АРАСЫНДАГЫ ЭМОЦИОНАЛДЫ РЕАКЦИЯСЫ МЕН ОТРЕСУ СТРАТЕГИЯСЫ: КеЛДЕНЕН ОНЛАЙН ЗЕРТТЕУ
Мария В. Прилуцкая1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9099-316X Токжан Т. Мендуалиева1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1665-3332 Орнелла Корацца23, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7371-319X
1 «Семей медицина унтверсител» КеАК ПФ, Дербестендiрiлген медицина жэне педиатрия кафедрасы, Павлодар, Казахстан Республикасы;
2 Хартфордшир университет^ емiр жэне медициналык гылымдар мектеб^ Хатфилд, Великобритания;
3 «Сапиенца» - Рим университет^ Медициналык жэне хирургиялык гылымдар департамент^ Рим, Италия.
Юрюпе: Коронавирустык инфекция (СOVID-19) медицина ^амы арасында айтарлыктай алачдаушылык тудырады. Алды^ы катарлы эпидемияда жумыс ютейтЫ клиницистерге кеп ке^л бвлiнсе де, медицина студенттерЫщ денсаулыгына пандемияныщ тигiзер 8серi туралы деректер ете шектеулi.
Максаты: Бул зерттеу COVID-19 8леуметтiк шектеулер жавдайында ^азакстан Медицина университету^ студенттерi арасындагы белгiлi кYрес стратегиясымен байланысты эмоционалды реакциялар мен базалык сезiмдердi багалауга багытталган.
Материалдар мен эд1стер: Келденеч сауалнама «Семей медицина университет^ КеА^ 279 студентi арасында еткiзiлдi. Багалау куралдарына базалык эмоциялар/сезiмдердi елшеуге арналган визуальды-аналогтык шкалалар, сонымен катар мазасыздык пен депрессияны багалаудыщ Госпитальдык шкаласы кiрдi. Деректердi салыстыру бiр факторлы дисперсиялык талдау ж8не Краскал-Уоллис тестю аркылы жYргiзiлдi. Covid-19 бойынша карантин жавдайындагы депрессия мен мазасыздыкка байланысты демографиялык сипаттамалар мен копингтерiн аныктау Yшiн мYмкiндiк катынасы (М^) есептеу арекылы логистикалык регрессия колданылды.
Нэтижеск Жалпы, респонденттердщ 17,6%-ында мазасыздык белгiлерi болган ж8не 30,0%-ы депрессияны бастан кешкен, 3,6%-ы коркыныш туралы, 5,7%-ы - ашу туралы, 9,3%-ы-зер^ туралы, ж8не 5,7%-ы - тYKiлу туралы хабарлады. Депрессия шкаласы бойынша орташа балл бакалавриат студент^ (р=0,019) мен резиденттер арасында айтарлыктай жогары болды (р=0,035). Бакалавриат бавдарламасыныщ студенттерi мен интерндер
стресст жечу Yшiн спортпен шугылданатынын (р=0,020), ^нделк жYргiзетiнiн (р=0,029), бейне ойындар (р=0,008) ойнайтындары туралы жиi айтты. Сонымен катар резидентура, магистратура жэне докторантурада окитындар клиникалык кызметке (p=0,006) шому аркылы стресстi кетерген. Мазасыздыкты аныктау мYмкiндiгi белсендi онлайн блогтар жазумен айналысатын окушылар арасында 1,56 есе жогары болды. Керiсiнше, ездiгiнен б™ алу мазасыздык симптомдарымен керi байланысты керсеттi (М^=0,73). Депрессия Yшiн, жасы (М^=0,88), ездiгiнен бiлiм алуга шогырлану (М^=0,68) жэне телевизиялык хабарлар мен фильмдердi керу (М^=0,76) регрессиялык модельде коргау факторлары болды. Алкогольдi тутыну кезiнде депрессияны дамыту мYмкiндiгi 1,65 есе естк
Корытынды: Бул зерттеу COVID-19 жавдайындагы казакстандык медицина студенттерЫщ арасындагы эмоционалды реакциясы мен ^ресу стратегиясы туралы алгашкы тYсiнiктi дамытуга ыкпал етедi. Зерттеу н8тижелерi окушылардьщ денсаулыгын сактау Yшiн алдын-алу эрекеттерЫ негiздеуге пайдалануга болады.
ТYЙiндi сездер: карантин, COVID-19, депрессия, мазасыздык, копинг.
Bibliographic citation:
Prilutskaya M., Mendualieva T., Corazza O. Emotional reactions and coping strategies of medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: an online cross-sectional study // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2020, (Vol.22) 4, pp. 5-14. doi 10.34689/SH.2020.22.4.001
Прилуцкая М.В., Мендуалиева Т.Т., Корацца О. Эмоциональное реагирование и копинг-стратегии среди студентов-медиков во время пандемии коронавирусной инфекции: поперечное онлайн исследование // Наука и Здравоохранение. 2020. 4 (Т.22). С. 5-14. doi:10.34689/SH.2020.22.4.001
Прилуцкая М.В., Мендуалиева Т.Т., Корацца О. Коронавирустыщ инфекция пандемиясы кезЫдеп медицина студенттер арасындагы эмоционалды реакциясы мен ^ресу стратегиясы: келденеч онлайн зерттеу // Гылым жэне Денсаулыщ сактау. 2020. 4 (Т.22). Б. 5-14. doi:10.34689/SH.2020.22.4.001
Introduction
The coronavirus pandemic poses an unprecedented challenge for the global community. A high speed of the infection spread and a dramatic growth in the number of fatalities cases caused by the coronavirus infection (COVID-19) indicate the gigantic burden for the public health, economy and social life [35]. The strict lockdown regimes generated an unprecedented emergency situation, especially for medical professionals, who made sustained efforts to contain the pandemic and adapt treatment standards for the new COVID-19 outbreak, while exposing themselves to virus exposure and contamination [23]. In accordance with the recommendations of the 'Centers for Disease Control and Prevention' (CDC) in the United States, any precautions involving medical staff should be implemented proactively in order to avoid contagion risks also for other staff and patients [7]. The constant update of clincal guidances during the COVID-19 period reflects the colossal work undertaken by international experts and research staff to introduce new effective and efficient standards for COVID-19 associated medical conditions [25, 31]. For example, the World Health Organisation (WHO) (WHO), the CDC, the National Institute of Health, the European Respiratory Society among many other health organisations have promptly released exhaustive set of clinical recommendations and other useful online resources [11, 24, 34]. In Kazakhstan, COVID-19 protocols have been updated ten times since the start of the outbreak in March 2020 [3]. The underlying principle for every medical expert in the country during COVID-19 is the following: the more evidence-based approaches will be introduced and established in the practice, the more intensive the informational flow will be [5, 17, 20]. However, the large
amount of clinical guidances and information made available during the pandemic has been accompanied by a myriad of public news and sometimes contradictory and unreliable messages released by the media that pose additional pressure to medical professionals who are under constant public scrutiny [10].
Such a phenomenon affects different clusters of expertise: from medical students to researchers [29]. The first reports on the drastic impact of pandemic challenges on both stress perception and anxiety among medical students were published since April 2020 [2, 6]. Cao et al. for instance pointed out that having relatives or acquaintances infected with COVID-19 was a risk factor of increased anxiety in medical college students, especially if living in urban areas, while family income stability and living with parents were protective factors against anxiety. Authors concluded that the mental health of college students should be monitored during epidemics as this social group represents an instrumental human capital for the stable development of medicine and public health practice [6]. In Kazakhstan, pandemic precautions entailed the migration of clinical activities to remote theoretical programmes in mid March of 2020. The preliminary results of the first attempt to assess the stress perception in medical students demonstrated the substantial rate of depression and anxiety in the medical university community [2].
In order to address such a knowldege gap, this study aims at assess emotional reactions and basic feelings in association with specific coping strategies among medical university students in Kazakhstan during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objectives were: (a) to compare the emotional reactions and coping strategies of different
educational groups; (b) to investigate the relation between the particular coping strategies and depression/anxiety symptoms.
Methods
The study was conducted at Semey Medical University, which consists of three administrative units: a central campus and two branches (in Pavlodar and Oskemen). The study subjects were the students of all of three units who enrolled into an online survey, upon receiving informed consent. The cross-sectional self-administered survey was developed with the Google Form programme and included five domains regarding socio-demographic characteristics, lockdown conditions, perception of psychological stress, depressive and anxious symptoms and coping strategies practied during the quarantine. A cover letter with the study information was disseminated via student online networks (e.g. mailinglists, fora). The sampling followed a "snow ball" procedure by multiple reposting of the cover letter and the bilingual Kazakh and Russian survey link through WhatsApp and Telegram channels. Given that the odds ratio (OR) derived from binary logistic regression was a primary objective of the study, the target sample size was calculated on the basis of our own pilot data according to the proportion of those involved in a a self-care coping strategy (e.g. self-education among the students based at the Pavlodar Branch of SMU) [2]. For this aim we used an online calculator designed by the Centre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics [8]. The minimal sample size was calculated at the level of 269 subjects (Figure 1). The survey was open between 23 and 30 April 2020.
Hypothesis: Two Sided Equality for binary covarute llt fi\ o Vtrtllt ii, p, = fim * o
D«u Input iHtlpi (LuoicUl
_hut_ftovill>
>1 p.
0 W
01 0 M
»w
P 14
C«ÉO*
N ïv>
Sot»
Vmmtii
* httuMly ol typ« 1 «roi
t Ptefeabtlifv «4 hj* □ mot
p, Event t «te «t X ■ 0
fj Ev*nt»l««*X • I
B PKfOfbM oi IS» MtnpW vntfi X • !
SmpW i
Figure 1. Sample size calculation.
The measurement tools in the survey forms included multiple-choice questions and visual-analog scales (VASs). For the assessment of depression and anxiety symptoms the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used. The HADS provided screening detection of affective symptoms at clinical or subclinical level. The core emotions and basic feelings were also measured with VAS from "0" to "5". Additionally, all the respondents were asked about the personal relevance of particular ways of overcoming stress
during the quarantine, including both positive/adaptive and negative/disadaptive behavioral coping strategies, using a five-point VAS.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was based on descriptive, comparative and inferential statistical methods. Descriptive data were presented as frequency in absolute numbers (n) and percentages for categorical variables (%), as well as mean (M) and standard deviation (SD) for numerical variables with normal distribution. Those numeric variables that did not have normal distribution were described with medians (Me) and interquartile ranges [IQR]. For numerical variables, data comparisons were provided with the ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests (H), accompanied by posterior paired comparisons with Bonferroni corrections. The level of significance was set at p-value (p) < 0.05. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to detect those demographic characteristics and coping activities that were related to the depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 quarantine. All analytical procedures were performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Version 20.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Ethical considerations
The protocol of the study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of Semey Medical University (23.04.2020, No.9).
Results
Among the 279 respondents, 209 (74.9%) were females. The mean age of males was 24.61 ± 0.49 year and that of females was 23.82 ± 0.21 year. A substantial majority were Kazakh - 242 students (86.7%). The distribution of the sample by the study programs was as follows: undergraduates, 29.7% (n=83); interns, 48.8% (n=136); residents, 18.3% (n=51); students of master programs, 2.5% (n=7); and two PhD students. Over the period of the quarantine, 224 respondents (80.3%) lived in the cities, 55 students (19.7%) resided in rural areas. Over a half of the respondents (n=143) lived with parents or relatives. Married respondents (n=88) lived with their partners, in some cases in the form of extended families in one household (n=14). Only 17.2% of the respondents shared flats with their friends or lived on their own. Overall, 211 respondents (75.6%) suspended clinical practice at hospitals due to the quarantine restrictions. The other respondents continued working in clinics as trainees (10.8%) or as paramedics (13.6%) in parallel with their studies. Of all the respondents staying indoors for more than 12 hours a day (82.1%), 69 respondents (24.7%) reported spending their entire days under the lockdown.
The characteristics of emotional reactions at the time of the lockdown indicated that up to 17.6% of the respondents had symptoms of anxiety and 30% experienced depression, while 3.6% reported intense fear, 5.7% anger, 9.3% boredom, and 5.7% disappointment. In contrast, more students experienced positive emotions and feelings: compassion, 8.2%; cheerfulness, 10%; hope, 17.6%.
Table 1 displays results of HADS and VAS for the entire sample and compares them between different educational groups.
HADS - the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; VAS - visual analogue scale;
Statistics are P values for ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis test (H); M - mean; SD - standard deviation; Me - median; IQR - interquartile range.
Table 1.
Characteristics of emotional state and reactions, by educational group.
Parameters Total (n=279) Undergra- Interns Residents Master and PhD p
duates (n=83) (n=136) (n=51) students (n=9)
HADS score M±SD M±SD M±SD M±SD M±SD ANOVA
Depression 5.45±0.22 5.89±0.42 5.17±0.27 5.45±0.58 5.67±1.08 0.581
Anxiety 4.49±0.22 5.21±0.43 3.65±0.30 5.29±0.51 5.89±0.77 0.003
VAS score Me [IQR] Me [IQR] Me [IQR] Me [IQR] Me [IQR] H-test
Sadness 1.0 [0, 2.0] 1.0 [0, 3.0] 0 [0, 2.0] 1.0 [0, 2.0] 2.0 [0, 3.0] 0.080
Discourage-ment 1.0 [0, 2.0] 1.0 [0, 3.0] 0 [0, 2.0] 1.0 [0, 2.0] 2.0 [0, 3.0] 0.184
Fear 1.0 [0, 2.0] 1.0 [0, 3.0] 0.5 [0, 2.0] 1.0 [0, 3.0] 2.0 [1.0, 2.5] 0.026
Anger 0 [0, 2.0] 1.0 [0, 2.0] 0 [0, 1.0] 1.0 [0, 2.0] 1.0 [0, 3.0] 0.012
Disappointment 1.0 [0, 2.0] 1.0 [0, 3.0] 0 [0, 2.0] 0 [0, 2.0] 2.0 [1.0, 2.0] 0.140
Loneliness 0 [0, 1.0] 0 [0, 2.0] 0 [0, 1.0] 0 [0, 1.0] 0 [0, 3.0] 0.638
Hopelessness 0 [0, 2.0] 1.0 [0, 2.0] 0 [0, 1.0] 0 [0, 2.0] 1.0 [0, 3.0] 0.196
Despair 0 [0, 1.0] 0 [0, 2.0] 0 [0, 1.0] 0 [0, 1.0] 0 [0, 3.5] 0.173
Apathy 0 [0, 1.0] 0 [0, 2.0] 0 [0, 1.0] 0 [0, 2.0] 1.0 [0, 3.0] 0.494
Boredom 1.0 [0, 2.0] 2.0 [0, 4.0] 1.0 [0, 2.0] 0 [0, 2.0] 0 [0, 1.5] 0.005
Compassion 1.0 [0, 3.0] 1.0 [0, 3.0] 1.0 [0, 3.0] 1.0 [0, 3.0] 2.0 [1.0, 2.5] 0.608
Cheerfulness 2.0 [1.0, 3.0] 2.0 [1.0, 4.0] 2.0 [1.0, 3.5] 2.0 [1.0, 3.0] 3.0 [1.0, 3.5] 0.931
Hope 3.0 [1.0, 4.0] 3.0 [1.0, 4.0] 3.0 [1.0, 4.0] 2.0 [1.0, 3.0] 2.0 [1.0, 3.0] 0.254
The mean of the HADS score of depressive symptoms did not differ among the educational groups, while the mean of the anxiety score was significantly higher in the undergraduates (p=0.019) and the residents (p=0.035). Intense fear and anger were more likely to be expressed by the undergraduates and residents in comparison to the other groups. Moreover, while being under the lockdown, the youngest students felt boredom substantially more frequently than the others did.
Stress coping activities, by educational group.
Survey respondents were also asked to rate the effectiveness of the various activities at coping with the quarantine-related stress. The results of the comparisons of the median VAS scores among the educational groups are presented in Table 2. The undergraduates and interns were more likely to do sport exercises, write diaries, and play videogames, while the residents and master/PhD students coped with the stress through clinical activity.
Table 2.
Activities Total (n=279) Undergradu ates (n=83) Inters (n=136) Residents (n=51) Master and PhD students (n=9) p
Me [IQR] Me [IQR] Me [IQR] Me [IQR] Me [IQR] H-test
Book reading 3 [1, 5] 3 [1, 5] 3 [1, 4] 3 [0, 4] 2 [1, 3.5] 0.442
Self-education 3 [1, 5] 3 [1, 5] 3 [2, 4] 2 [1, 5] 3 [1.5, 4.5] 0.663
Personal-growth activities 2 [1, 4] 3 [1, 4] 2 [1, 4] 2 [1, 3] 2 [1, 4] 0.163
Internet surfing 3 [1, 5] 3 [1, 5] 3 [1, 4] 3 [1, 5] 3 [2, 4.5] 0.966
Blog writing 0 [0, 2] 1 [0, 2] 0 [0, 2] 0 [0, 1] 1 [0, 2.5] 0.318
Listening to music 3 [1, 5] 3 [1, 5] 4 [2, 5] 3 [0, 5] 2 [1, 3.5] 0.109
Fitness and sport 3 [1, 5] 3 [1, 5] 3 [1, 5] 2 [0, 4] 2 [1.5, 3.5] 0.020
Live communications 3 [1, 5] 4 [1, 5] 4 [2, 5] 3 [1, 5] 3 [1.5, 5] 0.263
Online communications 4 [2, 5] 4 [2, 5] 4 [2, 5] 3 [1, 5] 3 [1.5, 4.5] 0.584
Clinical practice 2 [0, 4] 1 [0, 3] 2 [0, 3] 3 [1, 4] 2 [0, 4.5] 0.006
Focusing on hobby 3 [1, 5] 4 [1, 5] 3 [1, 5] 3 [1, 4] 4 [1.5, 5] 0.433
Diary writing 0 [0, 2] 1 [0, 3] 1 [0, 2] 0 [0, 1] 0 [0, 1.5] 0.029
Alcohol and energy drinks use 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 1] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 3.5] 0.143
Food cooking and tasting 2 [1, 5] 2 [1, 5] 2.5 [1, 5] 3 [0, 4] 2 [1, 4.5] 0.651
Gaming 0 [0, 2] 1 [0, 3] 0 [0, 2] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 2.5] 0.008
TV watching 3 [2, 5] 4 [2, 5] 4 [1.25, 5] 3 [1, 5] 2 [1.5, 4.5] 0.520
Me - median,
IQR - interquartile range,
p - value for Kruskal-Wallis tests (H)
We calculated the strength of the relationships between demographic characteristics, coping activities and depression and anxiety symptoms (Table 3). Within the multivariate models, the odds of having anxiety symptoms were 1.56 times higher for those who reported active blog writing in social networks during the lockdown. In contrast,
self-education was inversely related to the presence of anxiety symptoms. For depressive symptoms, age, focusing on self-education and TV watching were the alleviating factors in the multivariate regression model. Notably, the use of alcohol and energy drinks to overcome stress resulted in 1.65-fold increase in the odds of depression.
Table 3.
Associations between depression, anxiety, demographics and coping activities.
Parameters
Anxiety symptoms
OR
95%CI
AOR
95%CI
Depressive symptoms
OR
95%CI
AOR
95%CI
Age
0.99
0.90; 1.09
0.97
0.87; 1.08
0.94
0.85; 1.04
0.88
0.78; 0.98
Gender (male /female)
1.20
0.58; 2.50
1.60
0.66; 3.87
0.94
0.51; 0.71
1.44
0.66; 3.16
Self-education
0.77
0.64; 0.93
0.73
0.57; 0.94
0.74
0.63; 0.87
0.68
0.56; 0.85
Internet surfing
0.87
0.72; 1.05
1.03
0.75; 1.41
0.97
0.83; 1.13
1.43
1.09; 1.87
Blog writing
1.25
1.04; 1.51
1.56
1.21; 2.02
1.05
0.88; 1.25
1.03
0.82; 1.29
Online communications
0.79
0.66; 0.95
0.80
0.59; 1.08
0.81
0.69; 0.94
0.87
0.67; 1.11
Clinical practice
0.91
0.76; 1.08
0.97
0.76; 1.24
0.90
0.77; 1.05
0.96
0.78;1.18
Alcohol and energy drinks use
1.19
0.93; 1.53
1.15
0.84; 1.56
1.43
1.14; 1.79
1.65
1.22; 2.23
Gaming
1.94
0.77; 1.12
0.95
0.73; 1.24
0.99
0.85; 1.15
0.95
0.75; 1.20
TV watching
0.81
0.68; 0.97
0.94
0.71; 1.25
0.81
0.70; 0.95
0.76
0.59; 0.97
OR - odds ratio,
AOR - adjusted odds ratio,
95% CI - 95% confidence interval.
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the first investigation on the emotional reactions of medical students in Kazakhstan and provides novel insights on the role played by coping strategies to mitigate the affective symptoms during the COVID-19 quarantine restrictions.
The results of the study revealed a high prevalence of depression (30%) and anxiety (17.6%) among the medical students from SMU. The comparison of the depression and anxiety symptoms according to the HADS scores demonstrated that interns experienced less intense anxiety. Depressive symptoms did not significantly differ among the educational groups. Similarly, the self-assessment of the particular negative and positive emotions/feelings revealed the presence of at least one intense emotion in up to one fifth of the respondents. The undergraduate students rated more frequently their fear and boredom as strong. We were able to uncover the higher prevalence of active coping strategies focusing on self-development (self-education, personal growth, sport, book reading), and social-contact support (online and face-to-face communications). These various coping strategies were more prevalent among the undergraduates and the interns, while the postgraduates considered their clinical practice as an effective aid in overcoming COVID-19 stress. Even though avoidant coping mechanisms (alcohol use and gaming) were not at high prevalence among the respondents, drinking behavior revealed significantly higher odds of depressive symptoms. Likewise, active blog writing was found to be a risk factor for anxiety symptoms. Based on our previous findings, we supposed that blogging might be connected to greater exposure to informational bombardment from various sources, including those spreading unreliable intimidating
data [2], as also highlighted in a recent consensus guidance on the problematic use of the Internet during the COVID-19 pandemic [19]. Alcohol use as avoidant coping, associated with an increased risk of depressive symptoms, was exhaustively discussed in a number of publications [14, 15, 27], including those forecasting repercussions of the COVID-19 social distancing [9, 21, 28].
Previous studies, undertaken before the emergence of COVID-19, found that medical students experienced depression and anxiety at a higher rate than the general population or students from other specialties [1, 13, 22, 26]. In this sense, the active coping strategies play a key role for stress management in terms of adjusting to the challenges of theoretical and practical education, to financial constraints [12]. Our findings about positive and negative coping strategies' relation to depression and anxiety correspond with the literature data on the importance of variety of the strategies practiced and intensity of their use [16]. Meanwhile, the COVID-19 pandemic, posing unprecedented psychological pressure, has been associated with changes in the coping repertoire. According to Umucu and Lee (2020), the COVID-19 stress in general population was positively associated with the following coping strategies: self-distraction, denial, substance use, behavioral disengagement [32]. In contrast, our findings revealed higher prevalence of positive coping activities and emotions/feelings (hope, cheerfulness, compassion) in medical students. The literature analysis shows that all internationally recommended coping strategies for COVID-19 stress are actively practiced by the respondents focusing on physical activities, self-development, and education [18].
Another point of our attention is the difference in experiencing particular emotions and feelings in specific
educational groups. To the best of our knowledge, there are no published data on the exact emotional features among undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate medical students in light of the COVID-19 precautionary measures. Our results, including prevalent fear, boredom and anxiety in the undergraduates, along with an adverse link between the age and the depression HADS score, demonstrated important implications for the future development of tailored mental-health prevention measures, especially for those of younger age. This predominance might account for the poorer emotional intelligence of first-years medical students [30], their stronger need for interactive educational approaches, with focusing not only on cognitive, but also on behavioral and emotional competencies [4]. It also could be connected with a more critical role of live peer contacts for younger students [33], which were restricted to a certain extent under the lockdown.
The study findings should be considered in light of some limitations. First, the participants were recruited through the limited number of social chats available to the research team from the Pavlodar branch of SMU. By using non-probabilistic sampling, the study findings on prevalence should be generalized with cautions. Meanwhile, a number of studies conducted in other medical universities revealed similar levels of depression and anxiety [6, 14]. Secondly, we were unable to examine the actual change of the students' emotional states during the COVID-19 due to shortcomings of the cross-sectional design. However, the survey's focus on a two-week period of the lockdown allowed us to capture the actual emotions and feelings under the lockdown. Third, the sample size limited the number of factors tested in the regression models and minimized the model fitness. Despite this limitation, we were able to detect several predictive variables in the model, and differentiate their roles as alleviating or deteriorating factors with respect to negative emotions during the COVID-19 lockdown.
Undertaking the pilot assessment of the emotional reactions to the pandemic precautionary measures, our study offered novel insights into mental health risks and threats during COVID-19. This is the first study of its kind to consider the emotional adaptation to the lockdown conditions in Kazakhstani youth in general and in medical students in particular. The present findings warrant future efforts to develop mental health preventive recommendations especially for students with anxiety and depressive reactions and negative (avoidant) coping strategies.
Conclusions
1. The present study reported that up to a third of medical students of SMU experienced depression, which is consistent with international statistics in similar population groups. While the respondents with anxiety comprised a lower proportion (17.6%) of the sample, anxiety intensity varied with each educational group.
2. The complexity of affective reactions during COVID-19 was embodied in a wide spectrum of positive and negative emotions that varied between different educational groups and accompanied depression and anxiety.
3. Positive coping activities focusing on self-education, self-development, social support and physical activities
were popular among medical students released from clinical practice and exposed to distance education. Activities at public health settings were the other key coping mechanism that maintained its high relevance for the postgraduates (residents, master and PhD students) during the COVID-19 quarantine.
4. Avoidant coping methods, which were proven to be exacerbating factors for stress management, were found to have an aggravating effect on depression (alcohol use) and anxiety (blog writing) in the student sample, by raising their risks 1.65 and 1.56 times respectively.
Authors contribution:
Mariya Prilutskaya - chief author, statistical analysis, manuscript writing;
Tokzhan Mendualieva - respondents enrollment, material processing;
Ornella Corazza - scientific advice, manuscript preparation.
Conflict Interest:
The authors have no conflict interest to declare.
Funding:
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Литература:
1. Алтыбаева Г.К., Оспанова Н.Н., Молдагалиев Т.М., Сарсембина Ж.Ж., Сексенбаев Н.Ж., Докенова С.В. Факторы аддиктивной предрасположенности у студентов первого курса Государственного медицинского университета города Семей // Наука и Здравоохранение. 2018. 5 (Т.20). С. 135-144.
2. Прилуцкая М. В., Гржибовский А. М. Восприятие чрезвычайного положения в связи с коронавирусной инфекцией учащимися и сотрудниками медицинского вуза в Казахстане // Экология человека. 2020. № 6. С. 4-12.
3. Республиканский центр развития здравоохранения МЗ РК. Клинический протокол диагностики и лечения. Коронавирусная инфекция -COVID-19, 10-я редакция (29.06.2020) - URL: https://diseases.medelement.com - (дата обращения: 18.07.2020).
4. Behrens C.C., Dolmans D.H., Gormley G.J., Driessen E.W. Exploring undergraduate students achievement emotions during ward round simulation: A mixed-method study // BMC Medical Education. 2019. № 1 (19). C. 316.
5. Blake H., Bermingham F., Johnson G., Tabner A. Mitigating the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare Workers: A Digital Learning Package // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020. № 9 (17). C. 2997.
6. Cao W., Fang Z., Hou G, Han M., Xu X., Dong J., Zheng J. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China // Psychiatry Research. 2020. (287). C. 112934.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Interim Guidance for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Systems and 911 Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) for COVID-19 in the United States. - [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/guidance-for-ems.html (дата обращения:
27.06.2020).
8. Centre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics. Simple Logistic Regression. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www2.ccrb.cuhk.edu.hk/stat/epistudies/reg3.htm (дата обращения: 27.06.2020).
9. Clay J.M., Parker M.O. Alcohol use and misuse during the COVID-19 pandemic: a potential public health crisis? // The Lancet Public Health. 2020. Т. 5. № 5. С. e259.
10. Dubey S., Biswas P., Ghosh R., Chatterjee S., Dubey M.J., Chatterjee S., Lahiri D., Lavie C.J. Psychosocial impact of COVID-19 // Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews. 2020. № 5 (14). C. 779-788.
11. European Respiratory Society. COVID-19: Guidelines and recommendations directory [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.ersnet.org/covid-19-guidelines-and-recommendations-directory (дата обращения: 27.06.2020).
12. Fares J., Al Tabosh H., Saadeddin Z., El Mouhayyar C., Aridi H. Stress, burnout and coping strategies in preclinical medical students // North American Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016. Т. 8. № 2. С. 75-81.
13. Garlow S.J., Rosenberg J., Moore J.D., Haas A.P., Koestner B., Hendin H., Nemeroff C.B. Depression, desperation, and suicidal ideation in college students: Results from the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention College Screening Project at Emory University // Depression and Anxiety. 2008. № 6 (25). C. 482-488.
14. Geisner I..M., Mallett K., Kilmer J.R. An examination of depressive symptoms and drinking patterns in first year college students // Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2012. № 5 (33). C. 280-287.
15. Grazioli V.S., Bagge C.L., Studer J., Bertholet N., Rougemont-Bucking A., Mohler-Kuo M., Daeppen J.B., Gmel G. Depressive symptoms, alcohol use and coping drinking motives: Examining various pathways to suicide attempts among young men // Journal of Affective Disorders. 2018. № 232. C. 243-251.
16. Heffer T., Willoughby T. A count of coping strategies: A longitudinal study investigating an alternative method to understanding coping and adjustment // PLoS ONE. 2017. № 10 (12). С. e0186057.
17. Kang L., Ma S., Chen M, Yang J, Wang Y, Li R., Yao L., Bai H., Cai Z., Xiang Yang B., Hu S., Zhang K., Wang G., Ma C., Liu Z. Impact on mental health and perceptions of psychological care among medical and nursing staff in Wuhan during the 2019 novel coronavirus disease outbreak: A cross-sectional study // Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2020. (87). C. 11.
18. Kar S.K., Arafat S.M.Y, Kabir R., Sharma P., Saxena S.K. Coping with Mental Health Challenges During COVID-19 // Asian J. Psychiatr. 2020. № 51. C. 199-213.
19. Kiraly O, Potenza M.N., Stein D.J., и другие. Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance // Compr Psychiatry. 2020. №100. С.152180.
20. Klerings I., Weinhandl A.S., Thaler K.J. Information overload in healthcare: too much of a good thing? // Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen. 2015. № 4-5 (109). C. 285-290.
21. Knopf A. Alcohol and isolation: Experts comment
on drinking behavior during COVID-19 // Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly. 2020. № 13 (32). C. 1-4.
22. Kuhlmann S.M., Huss M., Bürger At., Hammerle F. Coping with stress in medical students: results of a randomized controlled trial using a mindfulness-based stress prevention training (MediMind) in Germany // BMC Medical Education. 2016. № 1 (16). C. 1-11.
23. Lewnard J.A., Lo N.C. Scientific and ethical basis for social-distancing interventions against COVID-19 // The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020. Т. 20. № 6. С. 631.
24. National Institute of Health. What's new. Coronavirus Disease COVID-19 // COVID treatment Guidelines [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/whats-new/ (дата обращения: 27.06.2020).
25. Nicola M, O'Neill N, Sohrabi C., Khan M, Agha M., Agha R. Evidence based management guideline for the COVID-19 pandemic - Review article // International Journal of Surgery. 2020. Т. 77. С. 206-216.
26. Puthran R., Zhang M.W., Tam W.W., Ho R.C. Prevalence of depression amongst medical students: A meta-analysis // Medical Education. 2016. № 4 (50). C. 456-468.
27. Ramsey S.E., Engler P.A., Stein M.D. Alcohol use among depressed patients: The need for assessment and intervention // Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2005. № 2 (36). C. 203-207.
28. Rehm J., Kilian C., Ferreira-Borges C., Jernigan D., Monteiro M., Parry C.D.H., Sanchez Z.M., Manthey J.. Alcohol use in times of the COVID 19: Implications for monitoring and policy // Drug and Alcohol Review. 2020. Т. 39. № 4. С. 301-304.
29. Spoorthy M.S. Mental health problems faced by healthcare workers due to the COVID-19 pandemic-A review // Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 2020. Т. 51. С. 102119.
30. Sundararajan S., Gopichandran V. Emotional intelligence among medical students: a mixed methods study from Chennai, India // BMC Medical Education. 2018. № 1 (18). C. 97.
31. Tobaiqy M., Qashqary M., Al-Dahery S., Mujallad A.., Hershan A.A., Kamal M.A., Helmif N. Therapeutic management of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review // Infection Prevention in Practice. 2020. № 3 (2). C. 100061.
32. Umucu E., Lee B. Examining the Impact of COVID-19 on Stress and Coping Strategies in Individuals With Disabilities and Chronic Conditions // Rehabilitation Psychology. 2020. В печати.
33. Vries-Erich J.M. de, Dornan T., Boerboom T.B., Jaarsma A.D., Helmich E. Dealing with emotions: medical undergraduates' preferences in sharing their experiences // Medical Education. 2016. № 8 (50). C. 817-828.
34. World Health Organization. Country & Technical Guidance - Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance (дата обращения: 27.06.2020).
35. Wyper G.M.A., Assungäo R., Cuschieri S., Devleeschauwer B., Fletcher E., Haagsma J.A., Hilderink H.B.M, Idavain J., Lesnik T., Von der Lippe E., Majdan M.,
Milicevic M.S., Pallari E., Penalvo J.L., Pires S.M., PlaR D, Santos J.V., Stockton D.L., Thomsen S.T., Grant I. Population vulnerability to COVID-19 in Europe: A burden of disease analysis // Archives of Public Health. 2020. № 1 (78). C. 1-8.
References:
1. Altybaeva G.K., Ospanova N.N., Moldagaliyev T.M., Sarsembina Zh.Zh., Seksenbayev N.Zh., Dokenova S.V. Faktory addiktivnoi predraspolozhennosti u studentov pervogo kursa Gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta goroda Semei [Factors of addictive predisposition among first-year students of Semey state medical university]. Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2018, (Vol.20) 5, pp. 135-144 [in Russian].
2. Prilutskaya M. V., Grjibovski A. M. Vospriyatie chrezvychainogo polozheniya v svyazi s koronavirusnoi infektsiei uchashchimisya i sotrudnikami meditsinskogo vuza v Kazakhstane [Perception of the State of Emergency Due to Covid-19 by Medical Students and Staff in a Kazakhstani University]. Ekologiya cheloveka [Human Ecology]. 2020, 6, pp. 4-12 [in Russian].
3. Respublikanskii tsentr razvitiya zdravookhraneniya MZ RK. Klinicheskii protokol diagnostiki i lecheniya. Koronavirusnaya infektsiya - COVID-19, 10-ya redaktsiya (29.06.2020) [Republican centre of health care development of Ministry of Public health of the republic of Kazakhstan. Clinical protocol of diagnostics and treatment. Coronavirus infection - COVID-19, 10th edition (29.06.2020)] - Available: https://diseases.medelement.com - (accessed:18.07.2020) [in Russian].
4. Behrens C.C., Dolmans D.H., Gormley G.J., Driessen E.W. Exploring undergraduate students achievement emotions during ward round simulation: A mixed-method study // BMC Medical Education. 2019. V 1. N 19. P. 316.
5. Blake H., Bermingham F., Johnson G., Tabner A. Mitigating the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare Workers: A Digital Learning Package // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020. V 9. N 17. P. 2997.
6. Cao W., Fang Z., Hou G, Han M., Xu X., Dong J., Zheng J. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China // Psychiatry Research. 2020. N 287. P. 112934.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim Guidance for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Systems and 911 Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) for COVID-19 in the United States. - Available: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/guidance-for-ems.html (accessed: 27.06.2020).
8. Centre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics. Simple Logistic Regression. Available: https://www2.ccrb.cuhk.edu.hk/stat/epistudies/reg3.htm (accessed: 27.06.2020).
9. Clay J.M., Parker M.O. Alcohol use and misuse during the COVID-19 pandemic: a potential public health crisis? // The Lancet Public Health. 2020. V.5. N 5. P. e259.
10. Dubey S., Biswas P., Ghosh R., Chatterjee S., Dubey M.J., Chatterjee S., Lahiri D., Lavie C.J. Psychosocial impact of COVID-19 // Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews. 2020.
N 5 (14). P. 779-788.
11. European Respiratory Society. COVID-19: Guidelines and recommendations directory Available: https://www.ersnet.org/covid-19-guidelines-and-recommendations-directory (accessed: 27.06.2020).
12. Fares J., Al Tabosh H., Saadeddin Z., El Mouhayyar C., Aridi H. Stress, burnout and coping strategies in preclinical medical students // North American Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016. V. 8. N 2. P. 75-81.
13. Garlow S.J., Rosenberg J., Moore J.D., Haas A.P., Koestner B., Hendin H., Nemeroff C.B. Depression, desperation, and suicidal ideation in college students: Results from the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention College Screening Project at Emory University // Depression and Anxiety. 2008. N 6 (25). P. 482-488.
14. Geisner I..M., Mallett K., Kilmer J.R. An examination of depressive symptoms and drinking patterns in first year college students // Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2012. N 5 (33). P. 280-287.
15. Grazioli V.S., Bagge C.L., Studer J., Bertholet N., Rougemont-Bücking A., Mohler-Kuo M., Daeppen J.B., Gmel G. Depressive symptoms, alcohol use and coping drinking motives: Examining various pathways to suicide attempts among young men // Journal of Affective Disorders. 2018. N 232. P. 243-251.
16. Heffer T., Willoughby T. A count of coping strategies: A longitudinal study investigating an alternative method to understanding coping and adjustment // PLoS ONE. 2017. N 10 (12). P. e0186057.
17. Kang L., Ma S., Chen M., Yang J., Wang Y., Li R., Yao L., Bai H., Cai Z., Xiang Yang B., Hu S., Zhang K., Wang G., Ma C., Liu Z. Impact on mental health and perceptions of psychological care among medical and nursing staff in Wuhan during the 2019 novel coronavirus disease outbreak: A cross-sectional study // Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2020. V 87. P. 11.
18. Kar S.K., Arafat S.M.Y, Kabir R., Sharma P., Saxena S.K. Coping with Mental Health Challenges During COVID-19 // Asian J. Psychiatr. 2020. V 51. P. 199-213.
19. Kiraly O., Potenza M.N., Stein D.J., et al.. Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance // Compr Psychiatry. 2020. V 100. P.152180.
20. Klerings I., Weinhandl A.S., Thaler K.J. Information overload in healthcare: too much of a good thing? // Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen. 2015. N 4-5 (109). P. 285-290.
21. Knopf A. Alcohol and isolation: Experts comment on drinking behavior during COVID-19 // Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly. 2020. N 13 (32). P. 1-4.
22. Kuhlmann S.M., Huss M., Bürger A., Hammerle F. Coping with stress in medical students: results of a randomized controlled trial using a mindfulness-based stress prevention training (MediMind) in Germany // BMC Medical Education. 2016. N 1 (16). P. 1-11.
23. Lewnard J.A., Lo N.C. Scientific and ethical basis for social-distancing interventions against COVID-19 // The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020. V. 20. N 6. P. 631.
24. National Institute of Health. What's new. Coronavirus Disease COVID-19 // COVID treatment Guidelines - Available: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/whats-new/
(accessed: 27.06.2020).
25. Nicola M., O'Neill N., Sohrabi C., Khan M., Agha M., Agha R. Evidence based management guideline for the COVID-19 pandemic - Review article // International Journal of Surgery. 2020. V. 77. P. 206-216.
26. Puthran R., Zhang M.W., Tam W.W., Ho R.C. Prevalence of depression amongst medical students: A meta-analysis // Medical Education. 2016. N 4 (50). P. 456468.
27. Ramsey S.E., Engler P.A., Stein M.D. Alcohol use among depressed patients: The need for assessment and intervention // Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2005. N 2 (36). P. 203-207.
28. Rehm J., Kilian C., Ferreira-Borges C., Jernigan D., Monteiro M., Parry C.D.H., Sanchez Z.M., Manthey J. Alcohol use in times of the COVID 19: Implications for monitoring and policy // Drug and Alcohol Review. 2020. V. 39. N 4. P. 301-304.
29. Spoorthy M.S. Mental health problems faced by healthcare workers due to the COVID-19 pandemic-A review // Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 2020. V 51. P. 102119.
30. Sundararajan S., Gopichandran V. Emotional intelligence among medical students: a mixed methods study from Chennai, India // BMC Medical Education. 2018. N 1 (18). P. 97.
31. Tobaiqy M., Qashqary M., Al-Dahery S., Mujallad A., Hershan A.A., Kamal M.A., Helmif N. Therapeutic management of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review // Infection Prevention in Practice. 2020. N 3 (2). P. 100061.
32. Umucu E., Lee B. Examining the Impact of COVID-19 on Stress and Coping Strategies in Individuals With Disabilities and Chronic Conditions // Rehabilitation Psychology. 2020. Online ahead of print.
33. Vries-Erich J.M. de, Dornan T., Boerboom T.B., Jaarsma A.D., Helmich E. Dealing with emotions: medical undergraduates' preferences in sharing their experiences // Medical Education. 2016. N 8 (50). P. 817-828.
34. World Health Organization. Country & Technical Guidance - Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Available: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance (accessed 27.06.2020).
35. Wyper G.M.A., Assungäo R., Cuschieri S., Devleeschauwer B., Fletcher E., Haagsma J.A., Hilderink H.B.M, Idavain J., Lesnik T., Von der Lippe E., Majdan M., Milicevic M.S., Pallari E., Peñalvo J.L., Pires S.M., Plaß D., Santos J.V., Stockton D.L., Thomsen S.T., Grant I. Population vulnerability to COVID-19 in Europe: A burden of disease analysis // Archives of Public Health. 2020. N 1 (78). P. 1-8.
Corresponding author:
Mariya Prilutskaya - assistant, Department of personalized medicine and pediatrics, Pavlodar Branch of Semey Medical University, Pavlodar c., Republic of Kazakhstan.
Mailing Address: Republic of Kazakhstan, 140002, Pavlodar, Torajghyrov 72/1.
Phone: +77014186539
Email: [email protected]
