CC BY
36
Effects of triticale flour on the quality of honey cookies
Roman Kh. Kandrokov
Russian Biotechnological University"011, Moscow, Russia e-mail: [email protected] Received 27.04.2022; Revised 28.10.2022; Accepted 08.11.2022; Published online 04.04.2023
Abstract:
Flour confectionery products are highly popular in Russia, especially honey cookies (pryanik). In order to increase their nutritional value, wheat flour can be replaced by triticale flour rich in essential amino acids and minerals. This study aimed to determine the effects of triticale flour on the quality of honey cookies.
The control cookie sample was made from premium wheat flour, while the test samples were made from mixtures of wheat and triticale flours in various ratios (10-90%), as well as from 100% triticale flour of grade T-80. Standard methods were applied to determine the cookies' sensory and physicochemical characteristics, as well as their nutritional value and contents of minerals, vitamins, and amino acids.
All the samples with triticale flour showed good sensory characteristics. Adding up to 30% of triticale flour did not change the taste and aroma of honey cookies, whereas larger amounts of triticale flour made them sweeter and more aromatic. The test samples from 100% of triticale flour had higher contents of essential amino acids (arginine, valine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, and threonine) than the control sample from premium wheat flour. The contents of micro- and macroelements also increased with larger amounts of triticale flour in the formulation. While adding triticale flour increased the protein content in the test honey cookies, it had no significant effect on their fat and carbohydrate contents, or the calorie content. The tests showed that 60:40% was the optimal ratio of wheat and triticale flours.
Replacing wheat flour with 40% of triticale flour provided the finished product with good sensory properties and high contents of proteins, vitamins, essential amino acids, as well as micro- and macroelements. Thus, triticale flour proved to be a good replacement for wheat flour in the production of honey cookies.
Keywords: Honey cookie, premium wheat flour, triticale flour, formulation, quality indicators, nutritional value
Please cite this article in press as: Kandrokov RKh. Effects of triticale flour on the quality of honey cookies. Foods and Raw Materials. 2023;11(2):215-222. https://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2023-2-568
Foods and Raw Materials, 2023, vol. 11, no. 2
E-ISSN 2310-9599 ISSN 2308-4057
Research Article Open Access
®
https://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2023-2-568 Available online at http://jfrm.ru/en https://elibrary.ru/NGEQJI
INTRODUCTION
Triticale is an artificial type of cereals obtained by combining the genomes of wheat (Tritium genus) and rye (Secale genus). The protein content in triticale grain slightly exceeds the protein content in rye and wheat. Triticale grain can form wheat-type bound gluten, although its content is lower than in wheat. Moreover, triticale gluten is of lower quality compared to wheat due to rye-type proteins. On the other hand, triticale grain contains more water-soluble proteins than wheat and rye. Its biological value is higher than that of wheat due to a larger amount of free essential amino acids (lysine, valine, leucine, etc.). Additionally, triticale grain contains a variety of minerals, including large amounts of phosphorus and potassium, as well as magnesium, calcium, manganese, iron, copper, and others [1-13].
Rye traits inherited by triticale contribute to an increased activity of its amylolytic enzymes, in particular amylase, and a lower starch gelatiniza-tion temperature. As a result, triticale accumulates a significant amount of dextrins and maltose formed during the enzymatic hydrolysis of starch [14-21].
In recent years, Russia has seen a greater demand for flour confectionery products made from non-traditional raw materials of plant origin. Honey cookies (Rus. "pryaniks") are among the most popular types of flour confectionery due to their taste and aroma. They have a high energy value, but rather low levels of nutrients (essential amino acids, vitamins, macro- and microelements). Therefore, formulators seek to improve their nutritional value.
Historically, Russian honey cookies date back to the XI century, when they were called "honey bread". They
Copyright © 2023, Kandrokov This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
were made from a mixture of whole-grain rye flour with various berry juices and honey, which accounted for almost half of all the ingredients [22-24]. Over time, their formulation changed due to improved technology and new ingredients. As a result, they have become one of the most popular types of confectionary products in Russia [16, 25-32].
The current demand for honey cookies in Russia is on the rise. From 2015 to 2020, their sales increased by 14.3%. The popularity of honey cookies is mainly due to their affordability and a long shelf life compared to other confectionery products. Yet, their appeal is also down to their pronounced honey aroma, subtle notes of spices, and a sweet taste.
Despite a high energy value and an appealing taste, honey cookies have an unbalanced composition of essential amino acids and a low content of vitamins and trace elements. However, their nutritional value can be improved by enriching them with biologically valuable components [17, 33-36].
Today, flour confectionery products are fortified with non-traditional raw materials that are rich in valuable nutrients. They include chickpeas, peas, soybeans, chia, buckwheat, amaranth, triticale, rice, and many other components [37-40].
In this study, we used triticale flour, which contains all essential amino acids, vitamins, and microelements that humans need. Its baking characteristics are similar to those of wheat and rye, making triticale flour an excellent replacement for premium wheat flour in confectionery production [41-43].
Thus, we aimed to study the effects of triticale flour on the quality of honey cookies.
STUDY OBJECTS AND METHODS
Samples of honey cookies (Rus. "pryaniks") were made from premium wheat flour (control), mixtures of wheat and triticale flours in various ratios (10-90%), and 100% triticale flour of T-80 grade. The effects of triticale flour on the quality of honey cookies were determined according to the following standards: State Standard 26574-2017 (for premium wheat flour), State Standard 34142-2017 (for triticale flour of grade T-80), State Standard 33222-2015 (for white sugar), State Standard 33917-2016 (for starch syrup), State Standard 32188-2013 (for margarine), State Standard 19709-2019
(for enzyme-interesterified fat), State Standard 328022014 (for baking powder), and State Standard R 51232-98 (for drinking water). The quality indicators of wheat and triticale flour samples are presented in Table 1.
The main raw materials were premium wheat flour and T-80 grade triticale flour (78% yield of baking flour from milling triticale grains) [12]. Sugar, in cookie production, is most often used in the form of syrups (sugar, invert, sugar-honey, or sugar-treacle). Treacle, honey, and invert syrup are used to increase the products' hygroscopicity, thus prolonging their shelf life and preventing them from quick hardening. Other ingredients include margarine (82% fat), butter, and confectionery fats with a melting point of 34-37°C. Sodium bicarbonate, or baking soda (0.15% by weight of flour) and ammonium carbonate (0.4% by weight of flour) are used as baking powders. Most formulations of honey cookies also contain a mixture of cinnamon, cloves, allspice, black pepper, cardamom, and ginger to add flavor.
We used a traditional formulation of honey cookies, with such ingredients as premium wheat flour, white sugar, treacle, margarine, baking powder, and water. The dough was kneaded in a Kitchen Aid batch kneader. The ingredients were loaded in the following order: sugar-treacle syrup was mixed with margarine or enzyme-interesterified fat for 2 min until an emulsion formed, then the flour mixture with baking powder was introduced and the dough was kneaded for 5 min (22°C and 24% moisture for the final dough).
The dough was cut with a special cutter and baked in an electric oven at 200-220°C for 10 min. After baking, the finished products were cooled at room temperature. In the test samples (11 pieces), wheat flour was replaced with triticale flour (10 to 100%). The control sample was made from premium wheat flour.
We aimed to determine whether our samples' sensory and physicochemical characteristics complied with State Standard 15810-2014 and to identify the optimal amount of triticale flour to replace wheat flour.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Our samples were based on the traditional formulation of honey cookies (Rus. "pryaniks"), with varying ratios of wheat and triticale flours. First, a sugar-treacle syrup was prepared from water, sugar, and treacle.
Table 1 Quality indicators of wheat and triticale flour samples
Indicator Premium wheat four Triticale flour of grade T-80
Moisture, % 14.2 10.3
Crude gluten, % 28.0 20.0
Gluten quality, units (gluten strain meter) 83 90
Autolytic activity, s 266 110
Acidity, degrees 3.1 3.0
Ash, % 0.55 0.80
Flour whiteness, units (RZ-BPL whiteness meter) 54.0 36.0
Falling number, s 200 160
Kandrokov R.Kh. Foods and Raw Materials. 2023;11(2):215-222 Table 2 Sensory characteristics of honey cookies made from wheat flour, triticale flour, and their mixtures
Ratio of wheat and triticale flours
Cookie quality indicators
Taste and aroma Texture
Color
Cross-section
Surface
Shape
100% wheat (control)
90% wheat + 10% triticale
80% wheat + 20% triticale
70% wheat + 30% triticale
60% wheat + 40% triticale
50% wheat + 50% triticale
40% wheat + 60% triticale
30% wheat + 70% triticale
20% wheat + 80% triticale
10% wheat + 90% triticale
Sweet taste and aroma corresponding to flavoring additives
Highly sweet taste and pleasant aroma corresponding to flavoring additives
100% triticale
Pronounced sweet taste and pleasant aroma corresponding to flavoring additives
Creamy surface, uniform creamy-white crumb
Products with a soft, bonded texture that do not crumble when broken
Dark creamy surface, uniform creamy-white crumb
Light brown surface, uniform creamy-white crumb
Well-baked products, with a uniform well-developed porosity, without voids, hardening or traces of undermixing
Smooth upper surface, without cracks or swellings, with noticeable tears on the sides Smooth upper surface, without cracks or swellings, with tears on the sides Smooth upper surface, without cracks or swellings, with slight tears on the sides
Smooth upper surface, without cracks, swellings, or tears
Regular shape, without slackness or dents, with a convex upper surface
It was heated with constant stirring to 60°C until the sugar completely dissolved and then cooled to 30-40°C. To make the dough, the syrup was first mixed with fat and dry yeast, and then with flour and baking powder. The dough was kneaded for 5 min to reach 20-22°C and 23.5-25.5% moisture. After kneading, 40-g samples were cut and baked at 200°C for 15 min. After baking, the cookies were cooled for sensory and physico-chemical analysis [9].
In addition to sensory characteristics (Table 2), we determined the samples' moisture, alkalinity, water absorption, and density in accordance with State Standard 15810-2014.
As can be seen from Table 2, the samples with 30% of triticale flour had the same taste and aroma as the control, those with 40-60% of triticale flour had a highly sweet taste and a pleasant aroma, while the cookies with 70-100% of triticale flour acquired a pronounced sweet taste and a pleasant aroma.
With 10-100% of triticale flour, the samples had an invariably soft texture and did not crumble when broken.
As for the color, the cookies with up to 30% of triticale flour had a creamy surface and a uniform creamy-white crumb, those with 40-60% of triticale flour had a dark creamy surface and the same crumb color, while those with 70-100% of triticale flour had a light creamy surface and the same crumb color.
When broken, the samples with 10-100% of triticale flour looked well-baked, had a uniform well-developed porosity, and no voids or traces of undermixing.
The control cookie had a smooth upper surface, with no cracks or swellings, but with noticeable tears on the sides. The surface of the test samples was the same, smooth with no cracks or swellings. However, the samples with 10-20% of triticale flour had some tears on the sides, those with 30-50% of triticale flour had slight tears on the sides, and the ones with 60-100% of triticale flour had no tears.
All the test samples had a regular shape, without tears or dents, and a convex upper surface.
Table 3 presents the physicochemical quality indicators of honey cookies made from wheat flour, tri-ticale flour, and their mixtures.
As can be seen from Table 3, water absorption, density, and alkalinity of the samples tended to decrease as the amount of triticale flour increased. These changes in water absorption and density made the cookies more compact in texture and less crumbly. The decrease in alkalinity was due to triticale flour's lower alkalinity compared to premium wheat flour.
According to our data, the samples with increased amounts of triticale flour had a smoother surface with no side tears. The reason for that is that triticale flour contains more water- and salt-soluble proteins and less residual proteins compared to wheat flour [4]. These differences in protein components make the
Kandrokov R.Kh. Foods and Raw Materials. 2023; 11(2):215-222 Table 3 Physicochemical quality indicators of honey cookies.
Ratio of wheat and triticale flours Quality indicators
Moisture, % Water absorption, % Alkalinity, degrees Density, g/cm3
100% wheat (control) 14.2 215.3 1.9 0.64
90% wheat + 10% triticale 14.3 212.7 1.9 0.65
80% wheat + 20% triticale 14.5 211.4 1.9 0.65
70% wheat + 30% triticale 14.7 209.6 1.8 0.66
60% wheat + 40% triticale 14.6 208.8 1.8 0.67
50% wheat + 50% triticale 14.8 207.2 1.8 0.67
40% wheat + 60% triticale 14.7 206.9 1.7 0.68
30% wheat + 70% triticale 14.8 206.1 1.7 0.67
20% wheat + 80% triticale 14.7 205.4 1.7 0.68
10% wheat + 90% triticale 14.9 205.1 1.6 0.69
100% triticale 14.4 203.3 1.6 0.69
Figure 1 Honey cookies from wheat flour (control), mixtures of wheat and triticale flours (10-90%), and from 100% triticale flour
test dough pieces more extensible and less elastic, which prevents their deformation during cookie formation.
Also, the samples containing larger amounts of triticale flour had lower density compared to those with predominantly wheat flour. The changes in color and higher sweetness are associated with an increase in dextrins and sugars resulting from the enzymatic hydrolysis of starch, which gives the product a pleasant aftertaste.
Figure 1 show the samples of honey cookies made from premium wheat flour (control) and mixtures of wheat and triticale flours in different ratios.
Table 4 presents the nutritional value of the honey cookies made from wheat flour, triticale flour, and their mixtures.
According to Table 4, the protein content in the test sample from triticale flour increased by 22.8% compared to the control wheat flour sample. However,
Table 4 Nutritional value of honey cookies
Ratio of wheat and triticale flours Components (in 100 g)
Proteins, g Fats, g Carbohydrates, g Calorie content, kcal
100% wheat (control) 7.55 10.3 72.3 451.3
90% wheat + 10% triticale 7.87 10.6 73.2 457.2
80% wheat + 20% triticale 7.94 10.8 73.5 461.4
70% wheat + 30% triticale 7.99 11.1 73.7 465.8
60% wheat + 40% triticale 8.06 10.9 74.1 470.1
50% wheat + 50% triticale 9.02 11.2 74.4 474.7
40% wheat + 60% triticale 9.08 11.0 74.9 478.5
30% wheat + 70% triticale 9.12 11.1 75.3 483.2
20% wheat + 80% triticale 9.14 11.2 75.8 487.9
10% wheat + 90% triticale 9.18 11.2 76.1 492.3
100% triticale 9.27 11.1 76.9 497.6
Table 5 Vitamin contents in honey cookies
Ratio of wheat and triticale flours Vitamins, mg/100 g
E B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6
100% wheat (control) 1.3 0.2 0.1 1.2 11.4 0.2 0
90% wheat + 10% triticale 1.3 0.2 0.1 1.4 10.4 0.4 0
80% wheat + 20% triticale 1.4 0.3 0.1 1.6 9.3 0.6 0.1
70% wheat + 30% triticale 1.5 0.2 0.1 1.7 8.3 0.9 0.1
60% wheat + 40% triticale 1.6 0.3 0.1 1.8 7.2 1.0 0.2
50% wheat + 50% triticale 1.7 0.3 0.1 2.0 6.2 1.2 0.2
40% wheat + 60% triticale 1.7 0.3 0.1 2.2 5.2 1.4 0.2
30% wheat + 70% triticale 1.8 0.4 0.1 2.4 4.1 1.6 0.3
20% wheat + 80% triticale 1.8 0.3 0.1 2.5 3.1 1.7 0.3
10% wheat + 90% triticale 2.0 0.3 0.1 2.7 2.0 2.0 0.4
100% triticale 2.1 0.4 0.1 2.9 1.0 2.2 0.4
Table 6 Contents of macro- and microelements in honey cookies
Ratio of wheat and triticale flours Macro- and microelements, mg/100 g
Ca Fe Mg P K Na Zn Cu Mn
100% wheat (control) 79.4 1.41 25.4 129.4 151.4 110.6 1.0 0.3 0.8
90% wheat + 10% triticale 80.9 1.51 38.2 150.4 183.1 110.5 1.2 0.4 1.1
80% wheat + 20% triticale 82.4 1.61 50.9 172.1 214.8 110.4 1.3 0.4 1.5
70% wheat + 30% triticale 83.9 1.81 63.8 193.5 246.5 110.3 1.5 0.4 1.9
60% wheat + 40% triticale 85.4 1.91 76.6 214.5 278.2 110.2 1.7 0.4 2.5
50% wheat + 50% triticale 86.9 2.01 89.4 236.3 309.9 110.1 1.8 0.5 2.5
40% wheat + 60% triticale 88.4 2.21 102.2 257.7 341.6 110.3 2.0 0.5 2.5
30% wheat + 70% triticale 89.9 2.31 115.0 279.7 373.3 110.4 2.2 0.6 3.1
20% wheat + 80% triticale 91.4 2.51 127.8 300.5 405.0 110.5 2.3 0.6 3.5
10% wheat + 90% triticale 92.9 2.50 140.6 321.9 436.7 110.6 2.5 0.5 3.9
100% triticale 94.4 2.71 153.4 343.3 486.4 110.6 2.7 0.6 4.2
both the control and the test samples showed no significant changes in the contents of fat and carbohydrates, as well as the calorie content.
Table 5 shows the vitamin composition of the honey cookies made from wheat flour, triticale flour, and their mixtures.
As can be seen from Table 5, the contents of vitamins E, B1, B3, B5 and B6 slightly increases with larger amounts of triticale flour in the test samples. Vitamin B2
remained unchanged, while vitamin B4 decreased with higher contents of triticale flour in the wheat-triticale flour ratios.
Table 6 shows the contents of macro- and microelements in the honey cookies made from wheat flour, triticale flour, and their mixtures.
According to Table 6, the samples from triticale flour had their contents of Ca, Fe, Mg, P, K, Zn, Cu, and Mn increased by 18.9, 92.2, 503.9, 165.3, 212.3, 170.0,
Kandrokov R.Kh. Foods and Raw Materials. 2023;11(2):215-222 Table 7 Amino acid composition of honey cookies
Ratio of wheat and triticale flours Essential amino acids, mg/100 g
Arginine Valine Histidine Isoleucine Leucine Lysine Methionine Threonine
100% wheat (control) 0.367 0.390 0.197 0.327 0.627 0.260 0.150 0.264
90% wheat + 10% triticale_0.443 0.434 0.238 0.369 0.731 0.242 0.186 0.294
80% wheat + 20% triticale_0.470 0.455 0.247 0.383 0.752 0.256 0.187 0.307
70% wheat + 30% triticale_0.495 0.474 0.255 0.395 0.773 0.271 0.190 0.320
60% wheat + 40% triticale_0.521 0.495 0.264 0.408 0.794 0.285 0.192 0.333
50% wheat + 50% triticale_0.548 0.514 0.272 0.420 0.815 0.298 0.194 0.345
40% wheat + 60% triticale_0.574 0.535 0.280 0.433 0.836 0.312 0.197 0.357
30% wheat + 70% triticale_0.600 0.554 0.289 0.446 0.857 0.326 0.199 0.370
20% wheat + 80% triticale_0.625 0.575 0.297 0.458 0.878 0.341 0.202 0.383
10% wheat + 90% triticale_0.647 0.592 0.303 0.469 0.891 0.358 0.204 0.394
100% triticale 0.678 0.615 0.314 0.484 0.920 0.369 0.206 0.409
100.0, and 425.0% compared to the control sample from wheat flour. The Na content remained virtually unchanged for all the samples.
Table 7 shows the amino acid composition of the honey cookies made from wheat flour, triticale flour, and their mixtures.
As can be seen from Table 7, the cookie samples from triticale flour had their contents of arginine, valine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, and threonine increased by 84.7, 57.7, 59.4, 48.0, 46.7, 41.9, 37.3, and 54.9% compared to the control sample from wheat flour.
Thus, our tests proved that triticale flour of grade T-80 can be used in the production of honey cookies to enrich them with valuable substances, including vitamins, macro- and microelements, and essential amino acids. In addition, triticale flour has a positive effect on the quality of finished products, improving their sensory and physicochemical properties.
CONCLUSION
According to our results, triticale flour of grade T-80 can be used to replace premium wheat flour in the production of honey cookies (Rus. "pryaniks"). All the samples made from mixtures of wheat and triticale flours in various ratios, as well as from 100% triticale flour, had an excellent appearance.
Using up to 40% of triticale flour instead of wheat flour gives honey cookies good sensory characteristics and higher nutritional and biological values due to increased amounts of vitamins, macro- and microelements, protein, and essential amino acids.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The author declares that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES
1. Varavinit S, Shobsngob S. Comparative properties of cakes prepared from rice flour and wheat flour. European Food Research and Technology. 2000;211(2):117-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002179900124
2. Lapteva NK, Mit'kinyh LV. Optimal ratio of wheat, rye and triticale flour at manufacture of biscuits. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2013;34(3):35-38. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/PZYEER
3. Savenkova TV, Soldatova EA, Misteneva SYu, Taleisnik MA. Technological properties of flour and their effect on quality indicators of sugar cookies. Food Systems. 2019;2(2):13-19. https://doi.org/10.21323/2618-9771-2019-2-2-13-19
4. Alekseeva TV, Kalgina YuO, Ziablov MM, Vesnina AA. Development of formulations enriched flour confectionery products using grain processing. Modern Biotechnology. 2014;9(2):4-6. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/SJXGHL
5. Shishlova NP, Bushtevich VN, Shempel TP, Laputko EV, Dolgova EL. Characteristics of triticale bread-making potential using results of baking tests. Arable Farming and Plant Breeding in Belarus. 2017;(53):182-189. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/RWBTVJ
6. Aseeva TA, Zenkina KV, Ruban ZS, Lomakina IV. Use of triticale flour in baking of bread. Achievements of Science and Technology in Agro-Industrial Complex. 2018;32(5):81-88. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/0235-2451-2018-10521
7. Dhaliwal SS, Ram H, Shukla AK, Mavi GS. Zinc biofortification of bread wheat, triticale, and durum wheat cultivars by foliar zinc fertilization. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2019;42(8):813-822. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019. 1584218
8. Letyago YuA, Belkina RI. The development of bread recipes with the addition of the flour from barley and triticale grain. Bulletin of KSAU. 2019;153(12):176-182. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2019-12-176-182
9. Kalnina S, Rakcejeva T, Kunkulberga D, Galoburda R. Rheological properties of whole wheat and whole triticale flour blends for pasta production. Agronomy Research. 2015;13(4):948-955.
10. Vitol IS, Meleshkina EP, Kandrokov RKh, Verezhnikova IA, Karpilenko GP. The biochemical composition of different grades of triticale flour. Storage and Processing of Grains. 2017;210(2):30-32. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/ YGJGPT
11. Kandrokov RH, Pankratov GN. Technology of processing of grain triticale wheat type semolina. Bread Products. 2017;(1):52-53. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/XGUSZH
12. Kandrokov RH, Pankratov GN. Development of an efficient technological scheme for processing graintriticale in bakery flour. Russian Agricultural Sciences. 2019;(1):62-65. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S2500-26272019162-65
13. Kandrokov RKh, Pankratov GN, Ryndin AA, Konorev PM. Milling properties of new grades of triticale grain. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2021;(2):38-51. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2021.145
14. Kandrokov RH, Pankratov GN, Meleshkina EP, Vitol IS, Tulyakov DG. Effective technological scheme for processing triticale (Triticosecale L.) grain into graded flour. Foods and Raw Materials. 2019;7(1):107-117. https://doi.org/ 10.21603/2308-4057-2019-1-107-117
15. Zong Y, Li G, Xi X, Sun X, Li S, Cao D, et al. A bHLH transcription factor TsMYC2 is associated with the blue grain character in triticale (Triticum x Secale). Plant Cell Reports. 2019;38(10):1291-1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-019-02449-3
16. Derejko A, Studnicki M, Wójcik-Gront E, Gacek E. Adaptive grain yield patterns of triticale (xTriticosecale wittmack) cultivars in six regions of Poland. Agronomy. 2020;10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030415
17. Maradudin MS, Simakova IV, Maradudin AM. Effect of white bean flour on rheological properties of composite mixtures based on wheat flour and triticale. Technologies of the Food and Processing Industry of the Agro-Industrial Complex-Healthy Food Products. 2021;(3):35-42. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2311-6447-2021-3-35-42
18. Silva ADN, Ramos MLG, Ribeiro Júnior WQ, de Alencar ER, da Silva PC, de Lima CA, et al. Water stress alters physical and chemical quality in grains of common bean, triticale and wheat. Agricultural Water Management. 2020;231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106023
19. Goryanina TA, Medvedev AM. Baking grain quality of winter triticale, winter wheat and winter rye. Grain Economy of Russia. 2020;67(1):28-32. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2020-67-1-28-32
20. Shabolkina EN, Anisimkina NV, Belyaeva MV Technological and bread baking traits of triticale. Grain Economy of Russia. 2019;62(2):21-26. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2019-62-2-21-26
21. Zhanabayeva KK, Ongarbayeva NO, Ruchkina GA, Yesseyeva GK, Smolyakova VL. Features of technological properties of triticale grain of Kazakhstan's selection. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2018;13(10):8292-8299.
22. Yu Z-L, Liu R. Effect of electrolyzed water on enzyme activities of triticale malt during germination. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2019;56(3):1495-1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-03637-5
23. Jonnala RS, MacRitchie F, Herald TJ, Lafiandra D, Margiotta B, Tilley M. Protein and quality characterization of triticale translocation lines in breadmaking. Cereal Chemistry. 2010;87(6):546-552. https://doi.org/10.1094/ CCHEM-02-10-0025
24. Daribayeva G, Magomedov GO, Iztaev B, Zhexenbay N, Tyussyupova B. Preparation of triticale flour by ion-ozone treatment for pasta quality improvement. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 2019;4(11):64-73. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.174805
25. Aragüez L, Colombo A, Borneo R, Aguirre A. Active packaging from triticale flour films for prolonging storage life of cherry tomato. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. 2020;25. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.fpsl.2020.100520
26. Tertychnaya TN, Drannikov AV, Shevtsov AA, Zasypkin NV. Prospects for the use of carrot powder in the production of bread from triticale flour. Bread Products. 2021;(11):46-49. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/BBSBZK
27. Solomina LS, Solomin DA. Formation of triticale citrate starch properties. Achievements of Science and Technology in Agro-Industrial Complex. 2020;34(5):73-76. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/ZYIHTX
28. Kiyabaeva AT, Ongarbaeva NO, Zhapparova NK. Characteristics of the enzyme complex of Kazakhstan triticale grain. The Journal of Almaty Technological University. 2020;(2):12-17. (In Kazakh.). https://elibrary.ru/CMQERZ
29. Kondratyev NB, Kazancev EV, Osipov MV, Petrova NA, Rudenko OS. Research of the moisture transfer processes in gingerbread with fruit filling produced using various types of modified starch. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2019;(4):35-46. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2019.187
30. Vaskina VA, Kandrokov RKh, Haydar-Zade LN. Study of impact of amaranth flour and wall material of enclosed nut oil on quality of raw gummy gingerbread. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Agrarian Series. 2021;59(2):243-254. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29235/1817-7204-2021-59-2-243-254
31. Kondratiev NB, Kazantsev EV, Petrova NA, Osipov MV, Svyatoslavova IM. Influence of packaging properties on changes moisture of raw gingerbreads with fruit filling. Food Industry. 2019;(7):16-18. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/ 10.24411/0235-2486-2019-10096
32. Sanzharovskaya NS, Sokol NV, Khrapko OP. The use of non-traditional raw materials in raw gingerbread technology. Bulletin of KSAU. 2018;136(1):147-154. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/YOSPDG
33. Khaydar-zade LN, Abdullaeva MA. Effects of carrot powder on the quality of honey cookies. Bulletin of the Technological University of Tajikistan. 2016;26(1):75-78. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/WAGJLL
34. Yilova RM, Shiritova LY, Khatokhov DM. Influence of the breaking from the world of Magalebs on organoleptic and physino-chemical results of the world. Izvestiya of Kabardino-Balkarian State Agrarian University named after V.M. Kokov. 2020;27(1):51-57. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/LNHDQA
35. Kravchenko M, Yaroshenko N. Study into effect of plant supplements on the quality indicators of gingerbread and similar spice-cakes. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 2017;5(11):45-54. https://doi.org/ 10.15587/1729-4061.2017.110168
36. Nasyrova YuG, Kiseleva MYu. Quality and competitiveness examination knivkers made with application fossil warning. Technology and Merchandising of the Innovative Foodstuf. 2019;56(3):114-118. (In Russ.). https://elibrary. ru/QGUHOG
37. Nasyrova YuG, Kiseleva MYu. Study of the effect of hawthorn fruit on the quality and competitiveness of gingerbread. Bread Products. 2019;(9):64-67. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/OMQRUN
38. Vershinina OL, Gonchar VV, Roslyakov YuF. New technology of raw dough gingerbread products of raised nutrition value with flour from chicory root crops. Izvestiya Vuzov. Food Technology. 2014;340(4):51-53. (In Russ.). https:// elibrary.ru/SNGQFL
39. Shcherbakova NA, Misteneva SYu, Rudenko OS, Kondrat'ev NB, Baskakov AV. Effect of oat-based ingredients on the quality of pastry products. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 2021;51(4):832-848. (In Russ.). https:// doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2021-4-832-848
40. Ndinchout AS, Chattopadhyay D, Ascension NM, Kaur V, Singh N, Paul MF. Muffins fortified with Dacryodes macrophylla L. fruit: quality and sensory evaluation. Foods and Raw Materials. 2022;10(1):40-50. https://doi.org/ 10.21603/2308-4057-2022-1-40-50
41. Roslyakov YuF, Gonchar VV, Vershinina OL, Kharkov SE. Technology raw gingerbread products based processing melon seeds. Food Industry: Science and Technology. 2014;25(3):8-12. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/SWLYJF
42. Shulga O, Chorna A, Arsenieva L, Hol A. Edible coating as factor of preserving freshness and increasing biological value of gingerbread cakes. Food Science and Technology. 2016;10(4):9-13.
43. Zhabbarova SK, Isabaev IB, Khaidar-Zade LN, Alekseenko EV. Concentrated paste from sugar beet as an alternative of treacles and an invert syrup in the production of gingerbread. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2020;(2):94-111. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2020.350
ORCID ID
Roman Kh. Kandrokov https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2003-2918
