CC BY
193
fitXQ
Foods and Raw Materials. 2022;10(2)
ISSN 2310-9599 (Online) ISSN 2308-4057 (Print)
Review Article ^^ Available online at http://jfrm.ru/en
Open Access ' ** https://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2022-2-533
https://elibrary.ru/QXKSOO
Effects of spray-drying parameters on physicochemical properties of powdered fruits
Liew Phing Pui* , Lejaniya Abdul Kalam Saleena
UCSI University"1*, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia * e-mail: puilp@ucsiuniversity.edu.my Received 21.01.2022; Revised 21.02.2022; Accepted 14.04.2022; Published online 23.06.2022
Abstract:
This review features different powdered fruits with optimal storage stability and physiochemical parameters. Spray-drying parameters, such as temperatures and flow rate, can affect the physical properties of powders. Carrier agents provide powders with various favorable qualities, e.g. good flow rate. Commercial spray-drying of fruit juice knows different carrier agents. The review involved scientific and methodological publications, conference papers, patents, regulatory papers, and Internet resources. They were subjected to grouping, categorization, comparative analysis, and consolidation.
Inlet temperature, maltodextrin concentration, and air flow rate of spray-drying increased the powder yield but decreased the moisture content. Inlet temperature, maltodextrin concentration, and feed flow rate affected the solubility. Effects of atomization rate, air flow rate and free flow rate were assessed in terms of yield, moisture content, hygroscopicity, and solubility. The article introduces the fundamentals of spray-drying and describes the effect of each spray-drying parameter on the powder quality. The list of parameters included inlet air temperature, atomization rate, air flow, and feed flow rate. We also evaluated the impacts of various carrier agents on the powder quality. The article contributed to a better understanding of how variable parameters affect the quality of food powders. The results provide the food industry with better choice options to adopt certain parameters for specific production needs.
Keywords: Temperature, atomization rate, flow rate, maltodextrin, powder properties
Please cite this article in press as: Pui LP, Saleena LAK. Effects of spray-drying parameters on physicochemical properties of powdered fruits. Foods and Raw Materials. 2022;10(2):235-251. https://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2022-2-533
INTRODUCTION
Dehydration of food allows extending its shelf life by reducing the chemical and microbial activities [1]. Drying reduces the moisture content of powder, which guarantees a long and safe storage [2]. High-water content makes fruit juices highly perishable products with high transportation costs. In this regard, powdered fruit juices are an attractive option for the food business: they are stable, space-effective, and easy to transport [3]. Atomization, droplet-hot air interaction, and moisture evaporation are the three essential processes of spray-drying [4].
Fruits usually undergo such procedures as open sun-drying, hot air drying, solar drying, microwave-drying, freeze-drying, and spray-drying. However, these methods have some disadvantages. For example, hot air drying is time-consuming, and freeze-drying is rather expensive [5, 6]. Spray-drying is a highly suitable
process for heat-sensitive products producing powders with good quality [7-9]. Spray-dried powders have good dispersion characteristics and are easy to incorporate into food products [10]. Some resent studies introduced spray-dried powders from cempedak jackfruit and kuini mango [11-13].
Spray-drying is an effective means of making inhalable powders [3]. The list of physicochemical parameters that affect powders during spray-drying includes such process factors as viscosity, particle size, liquid feed flow rate, temperature and pressure of the drying air, the kind of atomizer, etc. As a result, optimizing the drying process is critical for obtaining goods with improved sensory and nutritional properties, as well as for increasing process yield. Studies that feature surface characteristics of powder particles can provide better knowledge of the production process and optimize the powder composition [4].
Copyright © 2022, Pui et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Effective spray-drying requires a careful selection of operating conditions. For particles < 2 ^m, spray-drying has a poor cyclone collection efficiency. A common spray-dryer has an average output of 20-50%, but a new high-performance cyclone developed by the Swiss company BUCHI increased it to > 70%. Another significant problem with spray-drying is the lack of control over the mean droplet size. As a result, droplets come in a wide range of sizes, and pneumatic nozzles can cause clogging. Ultrasonic nozzles produce more consistent droplets and more uniform size distribution of the powder [7, 8].
Some difficulties, such as stickiness, hygroscopicity, and solubility, can be overcome by introducing the carrier agents before atomization. Biopolymers and gums are the most popular carrier agents. These compounds are typically associated with microencapsulation. They can minimize powder hygro-scopicity, protect delicate food components from unfavorable ambient circumstances, reduce food component volatility and reactivity, and improve the appearance of the finished product [10].
Fruit storage provides their off-season supply. However, some fruits tend to rot during storage and lose their nutritional content. The benefits of a dried extract over traditional liquid forms include cheaper storage costs, increased concentration, and active component stability. Spray-drying can produce powders with precise quality criteria in a continuous process [14]. It is a one-stage technology that turns liquid meals or suspensions into powder form. Spray-drying is also used in pharmacy for tablet coating. Spray-drying has three primary steps: atomizing the liquid feed, creating and drying the droplets, and droplet motion.
Problem statement. Spray-dried fruit juice powders have high sugar solids content and usually assume amorphous state [14]. Some recent studies describe the advances in the spray-drying of sugar-rich foods, including fruit juices, pulp, and honey with or without carriers [15]. Products with low molecular weight sugars, e.g. fructose, sucrose, and glucose, have a very low glass transition temperature. Sucrose, glucose, and fructose have the glass transition temperature of 62, 32, and -5°C, respectively. They reduce the glass transition temperature of sugar-rich foods, which are prone to caking during storage [16]. The hygroscopic and thermoplastic nature of dried materials, such as fruit juice powders, are known to cause adhesion to dryer walls, reduce the drying yield, increase stickiness, and decrease solubility [17]. These sugars are very hygroscopic, which increases their stickiness and tendency to agglomeration [18].
Organic lactic, malic, tartaric, and citric acids also make spray-drying difficult. When tartaric, citric, and malic acids were applied at concentrations of > 10% dry matter, they reduced the powder recovery. As a result, spray-drying of fruits with high acid content required more maltodextrin [19]. Spray-drying below +20°C of glass transition temperature helped avoid stickiness
but was not economically feasible [20]. Spray-dried blood fruit powder was found to have high solubility and good retention of resveratrol content [21]. This work features the effect of different spray-drying parameters, e.g. temperature, flow rate, flow rate, and carrier concentration, on food powders.
STUDY OBJECTS AND METHODS
The study was carried out at UCSI University in Malaysia's Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Food Science and Nutrition. It featured scientific and methodological literature, publications in scientific journals, conference papers, patents, regulatory papers, and Internet resources. The data were grouped, categorized, compared, and consolidated. Because 1995 was the year that the topic of spray-drying was first highlighted, the review includes high-quality peer-reviewed English-language papers published between 1995 and 2021. Most publications were Scopus indexed. The conference papers were chosen based on their citation quantity and keywords. The review did not include books and non-academic resources.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Basic principles of spray-drying. Spray-drying involves five major stages [22, 23]:
1) Concentration. The feed is concentrated before being pumped into the spray-dryer;
2) Atomization. The fluid products are dispersed into fine droplets and pumped into the drying chamber via an atomizer;
3) Droplet-air contact. The atomized feed comes in contact with the hot gas. Water evaporates, leaving a dry product. The contact time between spray-droplets and the hot air is very short, which provides an efficient drying process of heat sensitive materials without thermal decomposition;
4) Droplet drying. It occurs in two sub-stages. The first sub-stage happens at a relatively constant rate. During this sub-stage, the surface of the droplets is quickly moisturized by the water trapped inside the droplets. The second sub-stage happens when the surface of the droplets runs out of moisture. This substage yields a dried product;
5) Separation. The dried powder passes through the cyclone and is then collected in the collection vessel. The air is exhausted from the top of the cyclone and passes through the bag filter.
Main properties of spray-dried powders. Primary powder properties include hygroscopicity, moisture content, solubility, particle density, particle size distribution, appearance, color bulk density, particle morphology, and surface composition [24]. In addition to moisture content, some important characteristics of spray-dried powders also include particle porosity, size, and rehydration [20]. As a result, scientific publications concentrate mostly on the effect of feed qualities and drying conditions on the physical properties of powder,
although the results are sometimes confusing [25]. The spray-dried powders are analyzed in a few common tests ( Table 1).
The powder yield depends on the kind of fruit and the carrier agent. For example, orange juice powder has a big range of yield, from 25 to 85% [49]. However, acai juice powder yield was reported as 48.49% [26]. The moisture content is one of the main characteristics of powder which affects mainly solubility and bulk density [24]. Moisture content of spray-dried tomato powder was reported as 3.11-9.30%, whereas watermelon juice powder obtained by the same method had 1.47-2.48% moisture content [50, 51].
Fruit juice powder has a high hygroscopic feed and thermoplastic nature. As a result, it sticks to the dryer walls, which is one of the major problems in spray-drying [52]. The other reason might be its low melting point temperature, high water solubility, and low glass transition temperature [53]. Stickiness normally occurs if particles are not dry enough when they come in contact with one another or with the drying wall and thus stick to the drying chamber [19]. Stickiness causes operational issues and lowers the yield [16, 14].
Reported hygroscopicity of 12.48-15.79 for acai powder, while Rodrigues-Hernandez et al. stated 36.32-48.93 for cactus pear juice powder [26, 54]. According to Fitzpatrick et al., particle size and particle distribution eventually have significant impact on the powder flowability, handling, and processing [43, 55].
Solubility is another important property of powders [49, 50]. It can be affected by compressed air flow rates, carrier agents, and low feed rates [24]. The water solubility index increased when maltodextrin reached 96% [56]. According to Mahendran, 30% of maltodextrin produced a guava powder with 95% solubility, whereas 60% of maltodextrin added to guava juice decreased the solubility to 86% [38]. Bulk density is an important powder property as it determines the size of containers, which eventually affect the handling and transportation costs.
Consumers prefer it when the powder is reconstituted well and can be instantly dissolved in water [20, 57]. Mango powder showed a good reconstitution property: it completely dissolved in warm water at 40 °C with no suspended particles in the solution [52]. Reconstituted pineapple powder was found to have a lower lightness but a higher redness and yellowness, probably, as a result of the non-enzymatic browning reaction that occurred during spray-drying [58].
Youssefi et al. measured the color change in the pear cactus juice powder and its reconstituted solution. The slight changes in the color (AE) ranged from 6.7 to 9.8 [17]. L* was affected neither by the drying conditions nor by the color change, only by the maltodextrin concentration. The L* values of the reconstituted samples (13.00-16.00) were similar to those of the untreated juice (13.02), which meant that the spray-drying process did not darken the finished product.
Factors affecting the properties of spray-dried
powder. Table 2 shows the production of different fruit powders obtained by spray-drying. Spray-drying parameters are important and must be controlled as they affect the quality and quantity of powder. Some parameters of spray-drying include inlet and outlet temperature, air flow rate, feed flow rate, atomizer, carrier agents, and concentration. Different parameters affect such powder properties as bulk density, solubility, hygroscopicity, particle size, flowability, and glass transition temperature [50].
Inlet air temperature and outlet temperature. Table 2 demonstrates the effects of inlet air temperature on the physicochemical properties of spray-dried fruit powders. Such powder properties as moisture content, bulk density, particle size, hygroscopicity, and morphology are all affected by the initial settings of inlet air temperature [61]. Inlet air temperature proved a more important factor than maltodextrin content, judging by bulk density, caking, and water solubility index [62].
Inlet air temperature can range from as low as 80°C for red beet to as high as 205°C in for pear cactus [54, 63]. However, the normal range for spray-drying is 110-160°C [50, 64]. Nevertheless, Phisut reported that the inlet air temperature of 150-220°C is commonly used for food spray-drying [61]. Some recent studies of spray-drying of guava, pineapple, and bael powder revealed the inlet air temperature of 148, 160, and 166°C, respectively [65-67].
Quek et al. found that the moisture content of spray-dried powder decreased as inlet air temperature and outlet temperature grew higher [51]. The outlet temperature should be the same to maintain the product quality. For every 2-3°C increase in the inlet air temperature, the outlet air temperature is usually increased by 1°C. According to [49, 51, 68], a higher inlet air temperature reduced the residual moisture content. When the inlet air temperature was increased, the moisture content fell down because the heat transfer happened at a faster rate between the product and the drying air [61].
The inlet air temperature can also affect the hygroscopicity of powder [61]. Similarly, powders produced at higher inlet air temperatures were more hygroscopic [24, 26]. Higher inlet air temperatures lowered the moisture content in the powder, causing the powder to absorb moisture from the environment [61]. Inlet air temperature can also affect bulk density. In particular, increasing the inlet air temperature caused the bulk density to drop [49]. For instance, the bulk density of acai juice powder decreased as the inlet air temperature increased [26].
When temperature increased during spray-drying, case-hardening appeared at the outer layer of atomized powder [61]. Particle size was reported to increase together with temperature. Higher drying temperatures resulted in faster drying rates, triggering an early structural formation and preventing the particles
Table 1 Spray-drying conditions in fruit powder production
Powder Initial Total Inlet Outlet Aspirator rate/air
sample solids tempe- tempe- velocity
rature, rature,
°C °C
Feed rate
Atomization rate/
compressor pressure
Analysis
References
Acai
Pulp -
138-202 82-114 73 m3/h, 0.06 MPa 5-25 g/min
Process yield, moisture content, hygroscopicity, anthocyanin retention, outlet temperature
[26]
Amla
Juice -
120-200 81-119 75 m3/h
13-15 mL/min 0.12 mPa
Moisture content, hygroscopicity, bulk density, water solubility index, surface morphology, DPPH, total phenolic content
[27]
Andes berry
Juice 9°B 12
70
10 m3/h
485 mL/h
4 bar
Particle
morphology,
size, thermal
analysis, volatile
compounds,
anthocyanin
activity
[28]
Bayberry Juice 11°B 150
80
100% (35 m3/h)
439 L/h Product recovery, [29] moisture content, water activity, glass transition temperature, surface composition
Ber
Juice -
170-210 -
40-80 m3/h
1 L/h 9-21%
Color, bulk density,
hygroscopicity, packed density, outlet temperature
[30]
Black currant
Extract Final 35°B
150, 160, 70, 70, 180, 205 85, 100
Total polyphenol, [31]
antioxidant
activity
Black Juice -mulberry
110-150 -
800 L/h
150 mL/h
4.65 bar
Yield, moisture content, bulk density, solubility, surface morphology, glass transition temperature, particle size
[32]
Black- Pulp -berry
140-180 99-115 35 m3/h
0.49 kg/h
0.36 m3 air flow
Moisture content,
hygroscopicity,
anthocyanin
content,
color, surface
morphology,
particle size
[33]
Blueberry
Extract 30% total solids
160
70
23 000 rpm
Particle size,
true density,
water-binding
capacity,
anthocyanin
content
[34]
Powder Initial Total Inlet Outlet Aspirator Feed rate Atomization Analysis References
sample solids temperature, °C temperature, °C rate/air velocity rate/ compressor pressure
Canta- Juice - 170-190 75-77 - - - Moisture content, [35]
loupe water activity, vitamin C, ^-carotene content, dissolution, surface morphology
Elder- Juice 10-13°B 70-120 - - 180 & 300 mL/hr - Total phenolic [36]
berry content, color
Gac Aril 120-200 83-125 56 m3/h 12-14 mL/min 0.06 mPa Moisture content, water activity, bulk density, antioxidant activity, color total carotenoid, water solubility index [37]
Guava Concentrate 10.5°B 160 80 40 000 rpm Moisture content, pH, titratable acidity, total sugars, vitamin C, total soluble solids [38]
Slurry 170-185 80-85 4 kg/m2 18-20 rpm Moisture content, solubility, dispersibility, vitamin C [39]
Indian Juice 19% 120/160 80 - 1.2 mL/min 2.4x102 kPa Moisture content, [40]
goose- water activity,
berry vitamin C, dissolution
Lime Juice 9.5 140-170 1.75 g/min 5 bar Powder recovery, bulk density, surface morphology color [41]
Orange Juice 56-57% 160 65 Color, moisture content, titratable acidity, water activity, particle size, bulk density, glass transition temperature [42]
Pitaya Juice 50% 145-175 400 L/h 4.5 bar Moisture content, water activity, color, true density, bulk density, tap density, Carr Index, Hausner ratio, glass transition temperature, particle size, surface morphology, betacyanin content [43]
Pome- Juice 20-44°B 110-140 - 0.53 m3/min 7 mL/min - Moisture content, [44]
granate hygroscopicity, anthocyanin content, color, solubility, bulk density, yield, total phenolic content, antioxidant activity
Powder
Initial sample
Total Inlet solids temperature, °C
Outlet Aspirator
tempe- rate/air
rature, velocity °C
Feed rate
Atomization
rate/compressor
pressure
Analysis
References
Red beet
Concen- 20% trate
150, 165, 180, 195, 210
87-115 56 m3/h
390-560 g/h -
Moisture content, hygroscopicity, drying ratio, drying rate, productivity, bulk density, color, Tg, betayanin content
[45]
Red
pitaya
peel
Puree
155-175 75-85 900 m3/min
15 000 rpm
Color,
hygroscopicity,
moisture
content,
solubility,
water activity,
betacyanin
retention
[46]
Satureja Extract
Montana
L.
135-140 60-70
20 000-21 000 rpm Yield, moisture content, bulk density, hygroscopicity, water solubility index, total phenolic content, total flavonoid, sensory evaluation
[47]
Sea buckthorn
Juice
148.79191.21
65-9 2.1 kg/cm3 30 rpm
50 Hg
Moisture content, dispersibility, vitamin C, overall color change
[48]
The table is based on the findings of this study
from shrinking during drying [69]. A higher inlet air temperature produced powder with larger particles and greater swelling [70]. A lower inlet air temperature resulted in shrunk and smaller particles.
The moisture content in the powder was reported to improve solubility: the solubility of spray-dried raisin extracts and tomato concentrates increased together with the moisture content [18, 24, 50, 51]. The solubility of spray-dried roselle and tomato powder decreased as the drying temperature fell [24, 71]. A larger spray-dryer affected the beetroot powder color changes, namely increased the a* value and decreased the b* value [72].
Quek et al. focused on the color of spray-dried watermelon powder [51]. When the inlet air temperature increased, the b* value increased. However, the a* values increased at 145-165°C and started to decrease at 175°C. The lightness of the powders decreased when the temperature grew higher. At a higher inlet air
temperature, the color of the powders turned darker. Red color decreased when the inlet air temperature rose [51]. The stability of heat sensitive pigment depended on the inlet air temperature. The lycopene content in watermelon juice powder decreased at a higher inlet air temperature, which was in agreement with another publication on tomato pulp [50]. The reduction of lycopene content was likely due to thermal degradation and oxidation. On the other hand, Tonon et al. also reported that the inlet air temperature affected the anthocyanin content in acai juice powder [68]. A higher inlet air temperature also decreased the amount of pigments in powder [61].
Atomization rate and air flow rate. Tables 3 and 4 illustrate the effects of atomization rate and air flow rate, respectively. As for atomization rate, spray-drying uses different ranges of speed. Atomization rate had a positive effect on sirih powder yield [73]. Amla and
Table 2 Effects of inlet air temperature on physicochemical properties of spray-dried fruit powders
Powder Inlet air Yield/ Moisture Water Hygro- Den- Poro- Par- Caking Solu- Color Pig- Anti- Vita- Refe-
tempera- reco- content acti- sco- sity sity ticle bility ment oxidant min rences
ture, °C very, % vity picity size activity C
Acai 138-202 +ve -ve - +ve - - +ve - - - -ve - - [26]
Acerola 170-200 - -ve - -ve - - - -ve +ve - - - - [59]
pomace
Amla 100-200 - -ve - -ve -ve - - - NS L*+ve - -ve - [27]
Ber 170-210 - - - +ve -ve - - - - - - - - [30]
Black 110-150 +ve -ve - - -ve - - - +ve - - - - [32]
mulberry
Black- 140-180 - -ve - -ve - - NS - - L*+ve -ve - - [33]
berry
Canta- 170-190 - -ve -- - - - - - L*-ve - - - [35]
loupe a*+ve b* NS
Gac 120-200 -ve -ve - -ve L* NS TC NS -ve -ve [37]
Guava 170-185 - -ve - - - - - - +ve - - - +ve [39]
Jujube 140-160 - NS - +ve - - - - - L*-ve TC +ve - - +ve [60]
Lime 140-170 +ve NS - +ve - - - - - - - - - [41]
Orange 110-170 - -ve - NS - NS - - - - - - - [49]
juice
Pitaya 145-175 - -ve - - - - - - - LNS NS - - [43]
Pome- 110-150 NS -ve - NS +ve - - - +ve TC -ve +ve - [44]
granate +ve a*-ve
Red 155-175 - -ve -ve -ve - - - - +ve L* +ve -ve - - [46]
pittaya a*-ve
peel
Water- 145-175 - -ve NS - -ve - -ve CI NS +ve L*-ve -ve - - [51]
melon HR NS a* NS b*+ve
+ve - positive effect; -ve - negative effect; NS - no significant effect; — not reported
orange powder with greater moisture content resulted from an increase in atomization rate [27, 49]. However, Tee et al. stated that raising the atomization rate by 80-100% produced sirih powder with low moisture content and low hygroscopicity [73].
As for the air flow rate, Fazeli et al. and Goula and Adamopoulos applied air flow rate of 400-800 and 500-800 L/h, respectively, to produce black mulberry and tomato powders [32, 74]. Fazeli et al. reported that the powder yield increased with faster air flow rate, producing a powder of lower moisture content and higher solubility [32]. Greater air flow rates reduced the moisture content and increased the density [32, 74]. However, as the air flow rate increased, the solubility of black mulberry fell down while that of tomato increased [32, 74].
Feed solid content and flow rate. Table 5 summarizes the effects of feed flow rate on the physicochemical properties of spray-dried powdered fruits. Most of the initial sample used for spray-drying
were in the form of juice [36, 51, 76]. Two types of value were reported for Brix sample solids. Mofihammer et al., used pear cactus juice with 65% of total solids while Roustapour et al. reported lime juice with 12% total solids as spray-drying feed [75, 76]. The Brix value also depended on the fruit. For instance, bayberry juice spray-dried into powder had Brix of 7-17°, whereas for pomegranate juice it was 20-44° [65].
Different rates of spray-drying feed have also become subjects of scientific research. Elderberry juice was spray-dried into powder at the feed rate of 180 and 300 mL/h [36]. However, Ferrari et al. spray-dried blackberry pulp at the feed rate of 0.49 kg/h [33]. Bazaria and Kumar utilized feed flow rate of 400 mL/h to obtain high-quality spray-dried powdered beetroot [78]. Ribeiro et al. used different levels of intake temperature (110, 140, and 170°C), feed flow (0.36, 0.60, and 0.84 L/h), maltodextrin quantity (14-26%), and maltodextrin dextrose equivalent (DE) as independent variables (5, 10, and 15 DE) [79].
Pui L.P. et al. Foods and Raw Materials. 2022;10(2):235-251 Table 3 Effects of atomization rate on physicochemical properties of spray-dried powders
Powder Atomization rate Yield/recovery, % Moisture content Hygroscopicity Density Particle size Solubility References
Amla 30-50 +ve NS NS - NS [27]
Sirih 80-100% +ve -ve -ve - -ve - [73]
Orange 10 000-25 000 rpm - +ve - NS NS - [49]
+ve - positive effect; —ve - negative effect; NS - no significant effect; — not reported
Table 4 Effects of air flow rate on physicochemical properties of spray-dried powders
Powder Air flow rate Yield/recovery, % Moisture content Density Solubility References
Black mulberry 400-800 L/h +ve -ve +ve -ve [32]
Lime 47.1-57.8 m3/h +ve NS NS - [41]
Tomato 500-800 L/h - -ve +ve +ve [74]
+ve — positive effect; —ve — negative effect; NS — no significant effect; — not reported
Table 5 Effects of feed flow rate on physicochemical properties of spray-dried fruit powders
Powder Feed flow rate Yield/ recovery, % Moisture Water content activity Hygro-scopicity Density Particle size Solubility Color Pigment content/ retention References
Acai 5-25 g/min -ve +ve NS - - - - - [26]
Jujube 3-5 m3/h +ve -ve L*-ve TC +ve [60]
Orange 150-450 - -ve - NS NS - - - [49]
Watermelon and carrot 2-5 mL/min +ve +ve -ve [77]
+ve — positive effect; —ve — negative effect; NS — no significant effect; — not reported
Tonon et al. observed that high feed flow rates resulted in a lower yield [26]. This correlation was related to the slow heat and mass transfer. Higher feed flow rates triggered wall deposit, which reduced the yield [80]. Feed flow rate also had an adverse effect on the powder moisture content [77]. High feed flow rate shortened the time of contact between the feed and the drying air, thus decreasing the effectiveness of the heat transfer. An increment in feed flow rate also affected the evaporating intensity, which lowered the inlet air temperature and increased the water content in the powder [81]. Chen et al. reported that higher feed flow rate resulted in low-hygroscopicity jujube powder [60]. In addition, higher feed flow rates increased the particle size [80]. Higher feed flow rates increased the solubility of fermented carrot-and -watermelon juice powder [82].
Type and concentration of carrier agents. Selecting the best drying aids is one of the most important steps in spray-drying of fruits and vegetables. Drying aids, or wall materials, or carriers, are mostly used to increase the glass transition temperature of the feed. They can improve the recovery by decreasing the stickiness which causes the product to stick together or to the drying chamber [16]. An ideal spray-drying carrier has
a high solubility, bland taste, and good emulsifying and drying properties. Its limited solution viscosity is at 35-45% solids content; it is nonhygroscopic, nonreactive, and cheap [83]. Maltodextrin, alginate, Arabic gum, modified starch, inulin, and their combinations served as carriers for spray-drying of carotenoid-rich goldenberry (Physalis peruviana L.) juice, while cellobiose was used as control [84].
Table 6 demonstrates different carrier agents in fruit powder production, the most common carrier agents being maltodextrin and Arabic gum. Arabic gum had a high glass transition temperature and proved efficient in flavor retention [85]. Arabic gum is expensive because its supply from Middle East and Africa is as unpredictable as its quality. Maltodextrin is not only neutral in color and taste but also relatively cheap, which makes is the most common carriern commercial spray-drying [7, 16]. Maltodextrin consists of jff-D-glucose units that are linked by glycosidic bonds (1^-4), with dextrose equivalency (DE) that indicates its reducing capacity [86]. Lee et al. studied the use of additives as carriers in spray-drying, as well as the impact on such physicochemical parameters as hygroscopicity, flavor retention, and color indexing [87].
Table 6 Applications of different carrier agents in spray-drying of fruit powders
Powder Initial sample Carrier agent Concentrations/ percentage Analyses References
Acai Pulp Matodextrin (DE 20) & Arabic gum 6% Process yield, moisture content, hygroscopicity, anthocyanin retention, outlet temperature [8]
Amla Juice Maltodextrin 3-9% (w/v) juice Moisture content, hygroscopicity, bulk density, water solubility index, surface morphology, DPPH, total phenolic content [38]
Bayberry Juice Maltodextrin (DE 12 & 19) 1:1 (fruit juice) Moisture content, color [64]
Maltodextrin DE 10 10-50% Product recovery, moisture content, water activity, glass transition temperature, surface composition [29]
Black Juice Maltodextrin DE 6, 9, 20 8-16% Yield, solubility, bulk density, [32]
mulberry moisture content
Blackberry Pulp Maltodextrin (DE 20) 5-25% Moisture content, hygroscopicity, anthocyanin content, color, surface morphology, particle size [33]
Blackcurrant Extract Maltodextrin (DE 11, 18, and 21) Total °B 35 Total polyphenol and antioxidant activity [31]
Blueberry Extract Maltodextrin (DE 18.5) Total solids 30% (blueberry solids 20%) Particle size, true density, water-binding capacity, anthocyanin content [34]
Cantaloupe Juice Maltodextrin (DE 9-13) 10% Moisture content, water activity, vitamin C, carotene content, dissolution, surface morphology [35]
Elderberry Juice Acacia gum & maltodextrin (DE 4-7) 5:1-5:4; 1:1 (juice) Total phenolic content, color [36]
Gac Fruit aril Maltodextrin DE 12 10-30% Moisture content, water [37]
activity, pH, color, water solubility index, bulk density, carotenoid, antioxidant
Gooseberry Juice Maltodextrin 19% TSS Moisture content, water [40]
activity, vitamin C, dissolution
time
Guava Juice Maltodextrin 500 RM1249 7-12% Moisture content, solubility, [39]
dispersibility, vitamin C
Jucara Pulp Arabic gum, Maltodextrin, Gelatin Arabic gum and Maltodextrin (5-55%), Gelatin (5-15%) Anthocyanin content, moisture content, water activity, hygroscopicity, solubility, total color change, bulk density [88]
Lime Juice Maltodextrin (DE 5) 10-30% Moisture content [76]
Mango Juice Maltodextrin, arabic gum, starch wax, crystalline cellulose Surface morphology, stickiness, solubility, powder diffraction [14]
Orange Concentrate Maltodextrin (DE 6-21) - Glass transition temperature, residue formation [74]
Juice Maltodextrin and liquid glucose Particle size, wettability time, insoluble solids, bulk density, moisture content [49]
Pineapple Juice Maltodextrin (DE 10) 10-12.5% Moisture content, color, bulk density, solubility [7]
Pitaya Juice Maltodextrin 20 and 30% Moisture content, water activity, color, true density, bulk density, tap density, Carr's Index, Hausner ratio, glass transition temperature, particle size, surface morphology, betacyanin content [43]
Powder Initial sample Carrier agent Concentrations/ percentage Analyses References
Pitaya Juice Maltodextrin DE 10 8-22% w/w Color, hygroscopicity, moisture content, water activity, solubility, betacyanin content [46]
Pomegranate Juice Maltodextrin, arabic gum, starch wax 8 and 12% Yield, solubility, color, total anthocyanin, antioxidant [17]
Seabuckthom Juice Maltodextrin DE 20 20-49 g in 100 mL Moisture content, solubility, dispersibility, [48]
fruit vitamin C, overall color difference
Strawberry Juice Maltodextrin 10-30% Vitamin C loss, solubility, anti-caking, sensory [89]
Watermelon Juice Maltodextrin (DE 9-12) 3 and 5% Moisture content, water activity, dissolution, color, carotene content, sugar [51]
Table 7 Effects of maltodextrin concentration on physicochemical properties of spray-dried powder
Powder Malto- Yield/ Mois- Water Hygro- Density Particle Caking Solu- Color Pigment Anti- Vita- Refe-
dextrin reco- ture acti- sco- size bility content/ oxi- min ren-
concen- very, con- vity picity retention dant C ces
trations, % tent acti-
% vity
Acai 10-30 - NS - +ve - +ve - - - - - - [26]
Amla 3-9 - -ve - -ve NS - - NS L*+ve - -ve - [27]
Black 8-16 +ve -ve - - -ve - - +ve TC- - - - [32]
mulberry
Black- 5-25 - -ve - -ve - -- -ve - - [33]
berry
Guava 5.95- - +ve -ve - - -- +ve - - - -ve [39]
13.03
Pine- - - - - -ve BD -- -ve NS - - - [7]
apple
Pitaya 20 30 - -ve NS +ve NS L*+ve -ve - - [43]
Pome- 44.1-59.1 +ve granate
+ve BD
+ve TC+ve +ve
a*
" RP
-ve
[44]
Red 8-22 pittaya
+ve +ve +ve
+ve L*-ve -ve
[46]
BD - bulk density; TC - total color changes, +ve - positive effect; -ve - negative effect; NS - no significant effect; — not reported
ve -
*
a*-ve
Maltodextrin has been used to spray-dry sticky products, e.g. orange, tamarind, blackcurrant, raspberry, and apricot juice, honey, mango pulp, raisin juice, lime juice, watermelon pulp, and sweet potato puree because it facilitates the drying process [25]. The percentage of carrier agents incorporated ranges from 3% for watermelon juice powder to 40-64% for pomegranate juice powder [44, 51]. The concentration of maltodextrin was 15, 20, and 25%, respectively, in the production of spray-dried cempedak, papaya, and terung asam powder [90-92]. However, Henao-Ardila et al. reported 22.62% maltodextrin concentration as optimal for spray-drying of feijoa pulp, while Dantas et al. used 23% of malto-dextrin to produce powdered avocado drink [93, 94]. The flowability, color, antioxidant
activity, and phenol content of barberry powder were optimal at 13% (w/w) of maltodextrin [95].
Table 7 shows the effects of maltodextrin concentration on the physicochemical properties of spray-dried powder. Maltodextrin reduced the moisture content, which might be explained by the increment in feed solids and the low amount of free water [38, 50, 51, 96]. With the use of it, the yield was 18-35% but there was more deposit on chamber wall [49]. Maltodextrin increased the yield up to 18-35% but the deposit on the chamber wall reached 65-82% [49]. Yet the concentration of maltodextrin is important in controlling the quality of the powder. For instance, a higher amount of maltodextrin dextrose equivalent made it possible to obtain low-hygroscopicity liquorice [97]. Leyva-Porras et al. investigated the effect of spray-drying
Table 8 Applications of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in spray-drying of fruits
Powder Starting material Independent variables Response variables Optimization Design Software References
Acai Juice Inlet air temperature, feed Process yield, moisture RSM Rotatable central Statistica [26]
flow rate, maltodextrin content, hygroscopicity, composite 5.5
concentration anthocyanin retention, outlet temperature design
Acerola Juice Inlet air temperature, Drying aid/acerola, percent replace of maltodextrin by crystalline cellulose Moisture content, hygroscopicity, water solublity, flowability RSM Central composite design (CCD) Minitab 15 [59]
Black- Pulp inlet air temperature, Moisture content, RSM Central Statistica [33]
berry maltodextrin concentration anthocyanin retention, hygroscopicity, particle size, color parameters composite rotatable design 8.0
Cashew Juice Drying aid/juice, percent Ascorbic acid retention, RSM RSM with 11 Minitab [85]
apple replace of maltodextrin by crystalline cellulose hygroscopicity, flowability, water solubility runs 15
Guava Slurry Inlet air temperature, maltodextrin concentration solubility, moisture content, dispersibility, vitamin C RSM CCRD [39]
Jujube Juice Inlet air temperature, maltodextrin concentration, feed flow rate Moisture content, vitamin C, color, hygroscopicity RSM Box Behnken [60]
Orange Juice Inlet air temperature, atomization rate, flow rate Particle size, wettability time, insoluble solids, bulk density, moisture content Full factorial design Complete random design [49]
Pine- Juice Atomization Apparent and true density, Complete 3 repetition at - [7]
apple rate, maltodextrin concentration color, moisture content, solubility factorial design center point
Pome- Juice Inlet air temperature, Moisture content, RSM CCD Design [44]
granate maltodextrin concentration, feed/mix concentration hygroscopicity, anthocyanin content, color, solubility, bulk density, yield, total phenolic content, antioxidant activity expert 6.0
Red Puree Inlet air temperature, Color, hygroscopicity, RSM CCD - [46]
pitaya peel outlet temperature, maltodextrin concentration moisture content, water activity, solubility, betacyanin content
settings on the microencapsulation of bioactive components and the physicochemical qualities of strawberry juice with maltodextrin as a transporting agent [98].
Reduction in maltodextrin generally improved the solubility [7]. Similar observation was reported by Moreirra et al, who used a drying assistance ratio of cashew apple juice dry weight (5:1) and cashew tree gum substituting maltodextrin in 50% of spray-drying of cashew apple juice generated with high solubility (> 90%) [59]. The solubility of spray-dried mango powder decreased as the cellulose concentration grew. At 9% of cellulose, the solubility values of mango powder were 72, 71, and 31% using maltodextrin, arabic gum, and waxy starch, respectively [14]. Quek et al. studied watermelon powder production and discovered that adding maltodextrin in greater quantities than 10%
led to color loss [51]. These results confirmed those obtained by Farimin and Nordin, who studied roselle-and-pineapple powder [96]. Papadakis et al. reported that the exact color of each powder depended on the ratio of raisin juice solids:maltodextrin solids [18].
Optimization of spray-drying process. Response surface methodology is applied to determine the optimum condition of spray-drying because this procedure is comprehensive, simple, and highly efficient [82, 99]. The central composite design builds a quadratic model for the response variable without a complete three level factorial experiment. Only by optimizing the spray-drying process, food producers can obtain better powder properties and yield [26].
Table 8 summarizes the use of response surface methodology as optimization for spray-drying of fruit powder. The main independent variables are
inlet air temperature, maltodextrin concentration, and feed or flow rate [20, 26, 100]. Moisture content and water solubility are the most important properties of food powder [19]. However, yield and hygroscopicity proved to be the common response variables [26, 59]. Consequently, optimization of the amount of carrier is an important step in making a commercial product [16]. Li et al. applied the Box-Behken method to obtain the optimal condition of 142.8°C, 23.7% core material, and 11.7% feed solid in spray-drying of plum [101]. Pandey et al. reported the inlet temperature of 166.64°C and 9.26% maltodextrin concentration as optimal conditions for fruit slurry spray-drying process [102].
CONCLUSION
This review covered the basic principles of spray-drying while determining the effects of each spray-drying parameter on powder properties. These parameters included inlet air temperature, atomization rate, air flow rate, and feed flow rate. The article also summarized the effects of different carrier agents on the powder. Inlet temperature of spray-dryer and carrier concentration were found to increase the product yield and solubility, as well as to decrease the moisture content, pigment, and antioxidant content.
However, inlet temperature proved to be the main factor that affected the powder density. On the other hand, atomization rate had little effect on powder properties. Certain powder properties depended on the type of fruit and the range of parameters applied. The review showed that the impact of additives and encapsulation on the physicochemical parameters of fruit extract powder is critical. Changing the spray-dryer settings can solve the technical obstacles in spray-drying of fruit extracts. In addition, spray drying is a newer and cheaper method of turning fruit extracts into powder.
CONTRIBUTION
Liew Phing Pui gathered data, donated data and analysis tools, conducted the study, wrote the manuscript, and submitted it. Abdul Kalam Saleena Lejaniya was in charge of data collection and data contribution, formatted the manuscript and proofread the article.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors note that they have no known conflicting financial or personal interests that might have impacted the findings of this study.
REFERENCES
1. Fellows P. Dehydration. In: Fellows P, editor. Food Processing Technology: Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2000. pp. 311-340.
2. Doymaz I, Kocayigit F. Drying and rehydration behaviours of convection drying of green peas. Drying Technology. 2011;29(11):1273-1282. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2011.591713
3. Souza M, Mesquita A, Souza P, Borges G, Silva T, Converti A, et al. New functional non-dairy mixed tropical fruit juice microencapsulated by spray drying: Physicochemical characterization, bioaccessibility, genetic identification and stability. LWT. 2021;152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112271
4. Muzaffar K, Nayik GA, Kumar P. Production of fruit juice powders by spray drying technology. International Journal of Advance Research in Science and Engineering. 2018;7(3):59-67.
5. Wang W, Zhou W. Characterization of spray-dried soy sauce powders using maltodextrin as carrier. Journal of Food Engineering. 2012;109(3):399-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjfoodeng.20n.1L012
6. Perez NE, Schmalko ME. Convective drying of pumpkin: Influence of pretreatment and drying temperature. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 2009;32(1):88-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.2007.00200.x
7. Abadio FDB, Domingues AM, Borges SV, Oliveira VM. Physical properties of powdered pineapple (Ananas comosus) juice - Effect of malt dextrin concentration and atomization speed. Journal of Food Engineering. 2004;64(3):285-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjfoodeng.2003.10.010
8. Tonon RV, Brabet C, Pallet D, Brat P, Hubinger MD. Physicochemical and morphological characterisation of agai (Euterpe oleraceae Mart.) powder produced with different carrier agents. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2009;44(10):1950-1958. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2009.02012.x
9. Chew S-C, Tan C-H, Pui L-P, Chong P-N, Gunasekaran B, Lin NK. Encapsulation technologies: A tool for functional foods development. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering. 2019;8(5S):154-160.
10. Masters K. Spray drying handbook. Harlow: Longman Scientific and Technical; 1991. 725 p.
11. Pui LP, Karim R, Yusof YA, Wong CW, Ghazali HM. Optimization of spray-drying parameters for the production of "Cempedak" (Artocarpus integer) fruit powder. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization. 2020;14(6):3238-3249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00565-3
12. Gopinathan M, Yusof YA, Pui LP. Effects of different drying methods on the physicochemical and antioxidant content of "cempedak" (Artocarpus integer L.) powder. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2020;44(12). https:// doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14966
13. Loo YY, Pui LP. Storage stability of kuini powder in two packaging aluminum laminated polyethylene and polyethylene terephthalate. Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences. 2020;24(5):657-669.
14. Cano-Chauca M, Stringheta PC, Ramos AM, Cal-Vidal J. Effect of the carriers on the microstructure of mango powder obtained by spray drying and its functional characterization. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 2005;6(4):420-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2005.05.003
15. Sobulska M, Zbicinski I. Advances in spray drying of sugar-rich products. Drying Technology. 2021;39(12):1774-1799. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2020.1832513
16. Bhandari BR, Dutta N, Howes T. Problems associated with spray drying of sugar-rich food. Drying Technology. 1997;15(2):671-684. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373939708917253
17. Youssefi S, Ehmam-Djomeh Z, Mousavi MS. Comparison of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in the prediction of quality parameters of spray-dried pomegranate juice. Drying Technology. 2009;27(7):910-917. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930902988247
18. Papadakis SE, Gardeli C, Tzia C. Raisin extract powder: Production, physical and sensory properties. Proceedings of the 11th international drying symposium IDS'98; 1998; Halkidiki. Halkidiki: Ziti Editions; 1998. p. 1207-1213.
19. Bhandari BR, Snoussi A, Dumoulin ED, Lebert A. Spray drying of concentrated fruit juices. Drying Technology. 1993;11(5):1081-1092. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373939308916884
20. Grabowski JA, Truong V-D, Daubert CR. Spray-drying of amylase hydrolyzed sweetpotato puree and physicochemical properties of powder. Journal of Food Science. 2006;71(5):E209-E217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00036.x
21. Sasikumar R, Das M, Deka SC. Process optimization for the production of blood fruit powder by spray drying technique and its quality evaluation. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2020;57(6):2269-2282. https://doi. org/10.1007/s13197-020-04264-1
22. Parihari A. Performance study of spray dryer using various salt solutions. Masters thesis. Rourkela: National Institute of Technology; 2009. 132 p.
23. Patel RP, Patel MP, Suthar AM. Spray drying tech nology: An overview. Indian Journal of Science Technology. 2009;2(10):44-47.
24. Goula AM, Adamopoulos KG. Spray drying of tomato pulp: Effect of feed concentration. Drying Technology. 2004;22(10):2309-2330. https://doi.org/10.1081/DRT-200040007
25. Goula AM, Adamopoulos KG. Effect of maltodextrin addition during spray drying of tomato pulp in dehumidified air: I. Drying kinetics and product recovery. Drying Technology. 2008;26(1):714-725. https://doi. org/10.1080/07373930802046369
26. Tonon RV, Brabet C, Hubinger MD. Influence of process conditions on the physicochemical properties of acai (Euterpe oleraceae Mart.) powder produced by spray drying. Journal of Food Engineering. 2008;88(3):411-418. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.02.029
27. Mishra P, Mishra S, Mahanta CL. Effect of maltodextrin concentration and inlet temperature during spray drying on physicochemical and antioxidant properties of amla (Emblica officinalis) juice powder. Food Bioproducts and Processing. 2014;92(3):252-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/jibp.2013.08.003
28. Villacrez JL, Carriazo JG, Osorio C. Microencapsulation of Andes berry (Rubus glaucus Benth.) aqueous extract by spray drying. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2014;7(5):1445-1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-013-1172-y
29. Fang Z, Bhandari B. Effect of spray drying and storage on the stability of bayberry polyphenols. Food Chemistry. 2011;129(3):1139-1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.05.093
30. Singh A, Kumar S, Sharma HK. Effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on the juice yield from bael fruit (Aegle marmelos Correa) pulp. American Journal of Food Technology. 2012;7(2):62-72. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajft.2012.62.72
31. Bakowska-Barczak AM, Kolodziejczyk PP. Black currant polyphenols: Their storage stability and microencapsulation. Industrial Crops and Products. 2011;34(2):1301-1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/jindcrop.2010.10.002
32. Fazeli M, Emam-Djomeh Z, Kalbasi Ashtari A, Omid M. Effect of spray drying conditions and feed composition on the physical properties of black mulberry juice powder. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 2012;90(4):667-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2012.04.006
33. Ferrari CC, Germer SPM, de Aguirre JM. Effects of spray-drying conditions on the physicochemical properties of blackberry powder. Drying Technology. 2012;30(2):154-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2011.628429
34. Berg S, Bretz M, Hubbermann EM, Schwarz K. Influence of different pectins on powder characteristics of microencapsulated anthocyanins and their impact on drug retention of shellac coated granulate. Journal of Food Engineering. 2012;108(1):158-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjfoodeng.20n.06.035
35. Solval KM, Sundarajan S, Alfaro L, Sathivel S. Development of cantaloupe (Cucumis melo) juice powders using spray drying technology. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2012;46(1):287-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. lwt.2011.09.017
36. Murugesan R, Orsat V Spray drying of elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) juice to maintain its phenolic content. Drying Technology. 2011;29(14):1729-1740. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2011.602485
37. Kha TC, Nguyen MH, Roach PD. Effects of spray drying conditions on the physicochemical and antioxidant properties of the Gac (Momordica cochinchinensis) fruit aril powder. Journal of Food Engineering. 2010;98(3):385-392. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.01.016
38. Mahendran T. Physico-chemical properties and sensory characteristics of dehydrated guava concentrate: Effect of drying method and maltodextrin concentration. Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension. 2010;13(2):49-54. https://doi.org/10.4038/tare.v13i2.3138
39. Patil V, Chauhan AK, Singh RP. Optimization of the spray-drying process for developing guava powder using response surface methodology. Powder Technology. 2014;253:230-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2013.11.033
40. Thankitsunthorn C, Laohaprasit N, Srzednicki G. Effects of drying temperature on quality of dried Indian gooseberry powder. International Food Research Journal. 2009;16(3):335-361.
41. Zareifard MR, Niakousari M, Shokrollahi Z, Javadian S. A feasibility study on the drying of lime juice: The relationship between the key operating parameters of a small laboratory spray dryer and product quality. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2012;5(5):1896-1906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-011-0689-1
42. Shrestha AK, Ua-Arak T, Adhikari BP, Howes T, Bhandari BR. Glass transition behavior of spray dried orange juice powder measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermal mechanical compression test (TMCT). International Journal of Food Properties. 2007;10(3):661-673. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942910601109218
43. Tze NL, Han CP, Yusof YA, Ling CN, Talib RA, Taip FS, et al. Physicochemical and nutritional properties of spray-dried pitaya fruit powder as natural colorant. Food Science and Biotechnology. 2012;21(3):675-682. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10068-012-0088-z
44. Horuz E, Altan A, Maskan M. Spray drying and process optimization of unclarified pomegranate (Punica granatum) juice. Drying Technology. 2012;30(7):787-798. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2012.663434
45. Cai YZ, Corke H. Production and properties of spray-dried Amaranthus betacyanin pigments. Journal of Food Science. 2000;65(7):1248-1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb10273.x
46. Bakar J, Ee SC, Muhammad K, Hashim DM, Adzahan N. Spray-drying optimization for red pitaya peel (Hylocereus polyrhizus). Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2013;6(5):1332-1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0842-5
47. Vidovic SS, Vladic JZ, Vastag ZG, Zekovic ZP, Popovic LM. Maltodextrin as a carrier of health benefit compounds in Satureja montana dry powder obtained by spray drying technique. Powder Technology. 2014;258:209-215. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.03.038
48. Selvamuthukumaran M, Khanum F. Optimization of spray drying process for developing seabuckthorn fruit juice powder using response surface methodology. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2014;51(12):3731-3739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0901-y
49. Chengini GR, Ghabadian B. Effect of spray-drying conditions on physical properties of orange juice powder. Drying Technology. 2005;23(3):657-668. https://doi.org/10.1081/DRT-200054161
50. Goula AM, Adamopoulos KG. Spray drying of tomato pulp- in dehumidified air: II. The effect on powder properties. Journal of Food Engineering. 2005;66(1):35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjfoodeng.2004.02.031
51. Quek SY, Chok NK, Swedlund P. The physicochemical properties of spray-dried watermelon powders. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification. 2007;46(5):386-392. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cep.2006.06.020
52. Mani S, Jaya S, Das H. Sticky issues on spray drying of fruit juices [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 20]. Available from: https://www.engr.usask.ca/societies/asae-csae/papers/asaepapermbsk02-201.pdf
53. Adhikari B, Howes T, Bhandari BR, Troung V. Effect of addition of maltodextrin on drying kinetics and stickiness of sugar and acid-rich foods during convective drying: experiments and modelling. Journal of Food Engineering. 2004;62(1):53-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00171-7
54. Rodríguez-Hernández GR, González-García R, Grajales-Lagunes A, Ruiz-Cabrera MA, Abud-Archila M. Spray-drying of cactus pear juice (Opuntia streptacantha): Effect on the physicochemical properties of powder and reconstituted product. Drying Technology. 2005;23(4):955-973. https://doi.org/10.1080/DRT-200054251
55. Fitzpatrick JJ, Hodnett M, Twomey M, Cerqueira PSM, O'Flynn J, Roos YH. Glass transition and the flowability and caking of powders containing amorphous lactose. Powder Technology. 2007;178(2):119-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. powtec.2007.04.017
56. Phoungchandang S, Sertwasana A. Spray-drying of ginger juice and physicochemical properties of ginger powders. ScienceAsia. 2010;36(1):40-45.
57. Chen XD, Patel KC. Manufacturing better quality food powders from spray drying and subsequent treatments. Drying Technology. 2008;26(11):1313-1318. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930802330904
58. Jittanit W, Niti-Att D, Techanuntachaikul O. Study of spray drying of pineapple juice using maltodextrin as an adjunct. Chiang Mai Journal of Science. 2010;37(3):498-506.
59. Moreira GEG, Maia Costa MG, de Souza ACR, de Brito ES, de Medeiros MFD, de Azeredo HMC. Physical properties of spray dried acerola extract as affected by temperature and drying aids. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2009;42(2):641-645. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.lwt2008.07.008
60. Chen Q, Bi J, Zhou Y, Liu X, Wu X, Chen R. Multi-objective optimization of spray drying of jujube (Zizyphus jujuba Miller) powder using response surface methodology. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2014;7(6):1807-1818. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11947-013-1171-z
61. Phisut N. Spray drying technique of fruit juice powder: Some factors influencing the properties of product. International Food Research Journal. 2012;19(4):1297-1306.
62. Pui LP, Karim R, Yusof YA, Wong CW, Ghazali HM. Effects of inlet temperature and carrier concentration on spray-dried "cempedak" (Artocarpus integer) fruit powder and its reconstitution properties. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Technologia Alimentaria. 2021;20(2):135-148. https://doi.org/10.17306/J.AFS.0801
63. Obón JM, Castellar MR, Alacid M, Fernandez-Lopez JA. Production of a red-purple food colorant from Opuntia stricta fruits by spray drying and its application in food model systems. Journal of Food Engineering. 2009;90(4):471-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjfoodeng.2008.07.013
64. Gong Z, Zhang M, Mujumdar A, Sun J. Spray drying and agglomeration of instant bayberry powder. Drying Technology 2008;26(1):116-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930701781751
65. Aragüez-Fortes Y, Robaina-Morales LM, Pino JA. Optimization of the spray-drying parameters for developing guava powder. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 2019;42(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13230
66. Wong CW, Pui LP, Ng JML. Production of spray-dried Sarawak pineapple (Ananas comosus) powder from enzyme liquefied puree. International Food Research Journal. 2015;22(4):1631-1636.
67. Saha A, Jindal N. Process optimization for the preparation of bael (Aegle marmelos correa) fruit powder by spray drying. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition. 2018;3(4):44-51.
68. Tonon RV, Freitas SS, Hubinger MD. Spray drying of agai (Euterpe oleraceae Mart.) juice: Effect of inlet air temperature and type of carrier agent. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2011;35(5):691-700. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1745-4549.2011.00518.x
69. Reineccius GA. The spray drying of food flavors. Drying Technology. 2004;22(6):1289-1324. https://doi.org/10.1081/ DRT-120038731
70. Nijdam JJ, Langrish TAG. The effect of surface composition on the functional properties of milk powders. Journal of Food Engineering. 2006;77(4):919-925. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjfoodeng.2005.08.020
71. Al-Kahtani HA, Hassan BH. Spray drying of roselle (Hibiscus sabdarifa L.) extract. Journal of Food Science. 1990;55(4):1073-1076. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1990.tb01601.x
72. Gawalek, J. Effect of spray dryer scale size on the properties of dried beetroot juice. Molecules. 2021;26(1). https:// doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216700
73. Tee LH, Luqman Chuah A, Pin KY, Abdull Rashih A, Yusof YA. Optimization of spray drying process parameters of Piper betle L. (Sirih) leaves extract coated with maltodextrin. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 2012;4(3):1833-1841.
74. Goula AM, Adamopoulos KG. A new technique for spray drying orange juice concentrate. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 2010;11(2):342-351. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.ifset.2009.12.001
75. Mophammer MR, Stintzing FC, Carle R. Evaluation of different methods for the production of juice concentrates and fruit powders from cactus pear. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 2006;7(4):275-287. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ifset.2006.04.003
76. Roustapour OR, Hosseinalipour M, Ghobadian B. An experimental investigation of lime juice drying in a pilot plant spray dryer. Drying Technology. 2006;24(2):181-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930600559035
77. Mestry AP, Mujumdar AS, Thorat BN. Optimization of spray drying of an innovative functional food: Fermented mixed juice of carrot and watermelon. Drying Technology. 2011;29(10):1121-1131. https://doi.org/10.1080/073739 37.2011.566968
78. Bazaria B, Kumar P. Optimization of spray drying parameters for beetroot juice powder using response surface methodology (RSM). Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 2018;17(4):408-415. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jssas.2016.09.007
79. Ribeiro CMCM, Magliano LCSA, de Costa MMA, Bezerra TKA, da Silva FLH, Maciel MIS. Optimization of the spray drying process conditions for acerola and seriguela juice mix. Food Science and Technology. 2019;39:48-55. https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.36217
80. Chegini GR, Ghobadian B. Spray dryer parameters for fruit juice drying. World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2007;3(2):230-236.
81. Janiszewska E, Witrowa-Rajchert D. Effect of spray drying parameters on rosemary aroma microencapsulation. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Science. 2007;57(3):41-43.
82. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM. Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments, 3rd edition. New York: Wiley; 2009. 704 p.
83. Murua-Pagola B, Beristain-Guevara CI, Martinez-Bustos F. Preparation of starch derivatives using reactive extrusion and evaluation of modified starches as shell materials for encapsulation of flavoring agents by spray drying. Journal of Food Engineering. 2009;91(3):380-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjfoodeng.2008.09.035
84. Etzbach L, Meinert M, Faber T, Klein C, Schieber A, Weber F. Effects of carrier agents on powder properties, stability of carotenoids, and encapsulation efficiency of goldenberry (Physalis peruviana L.) powder produced by co-current spray drying. Current Research in Food Science. 2020;3;73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2020.03.002
85. de Oliveira MA, Maia GA, de Figueirado RW, de Souza ACR, de Brito ES, de Azeredo HMC. Addition of cashew tree gum to maltodextrin-based carriers for spray drying of cashew apple juice. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2009;44(3):641-645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2008.01888.x
86. BeMiller JN, Whistler RL. Carbohydrates. In: Fennema OR, editor. Food chemistry. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996. pp. 157-223.
87. Lee JKM, Taip FS, Abdullah HZ. Effectiveness of additives in spray drying performance: a review. Food Research. 2018;2(6):486-499. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.2(6).134
88. Bicudo MOP, Jo J, de Oliveira GA, Chaimsohn FP, Sierakowski MR, de Freitas RA, et al. Microencapsulation of Jugara (Euterpe edulis M.) pulp by spray-drying using different carriers and drying temperatures. Drying Technology. 2015;33(2):153-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2014.937872
89. Krishnan JR. Development of spray dried strawberry juice powder. Pahang: University Malaysia Pahang; 2008.
90. Pui LP, Karim R, Yusof YA, Wong CW, Ghazali HM. Anti-caking agent effects on the properties of spray-dried "cempedak" fruit powder. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science. 2020;43(4):621-635. https://doi. org/10.47836/pjtas.43.4.15
91. Chang LS, Tan YL, Pui LP. Production of spray-dried enzyme-liquefied papaya (Carica papaya L.) powder. Brazilian Journal of Food Technology. 2020;23. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-6723.18119
92. Chang LS, Eau Yong SM, Pui LP. Production of spray-dried "Terung Asam" (Solanum lasiocarpum Dunal) powder. Walailak Journal of Science and Technology. 2020;18(1). https://doi.org/10.48048/wjst.2021.6922
93. Henao-Ardila A, Quintanilla-Carvajal MX, Moreno FL. Combination of freeze concentration and spray drying for the production of feijoa (Acca sellowiana b.) pulp powder. Powder Technology. 2019;344:190-198. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.12.015
94. Dantas D, Pasquali MA, Cavalcanti-Mata M, Duarte ME, Lisboa HM. Influence of spray drying conditions on the properties of avocado powder drink. Food Chemistry. 2018;266:284-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.foodchem.2018.06.016
95. Naji-Tabasi S, Emadzadeh B, Shahidi-Noghabi M, Abbaspour M, Akbari E. Physico-chemical and antioxidant properties of barberry juice powder and its effervescent tablets. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture. 2021;8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-021-00220-z
96. Farimin AOA, Nordin E. Physical properties of powdered roselle-pineapple juice - effects of maltodextrin. Thesis of the National Conference on Postgraduate Research (NCON-PGR); 2009; Pahang. Pahang: University Malaysia Pahang; 2009. pp. 90-97.
97. Karaaslan i, Dalgiç AC. Spray drying of liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) extract. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2014;51(11):3014-3025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0847-0
98. Leyva-Porras C, Saavedra-Leos MZ, Lopez-Martinez LA, Espinosa-Solis V, Teran-Figueroa Y, Toxqui-Teran A, et al. Strawberry juice powders: Effect of spray-drying conditions on the microencapsulation of bioactive components and physicochemical properties. Molecules. 2021;26(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185466
99. Pua CK, Hamid NSA, Rusul G, Rahman RA. Production of drum-dried jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) powder with different concentration of soy lecithin and gum Arabic. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007;78(2):630-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjfoodeng.2005.10.041
100.Andrade I, Flores H. Optimization of spray drying of roselle extract (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.). Proceedings of the 14th International Drying Symposium; 2004; Sâo Paulo. Sâo Paulo; 2004. pp. 597-604.
101.Li Y, Tang B, Chen J, Lai P. Microencapsulation of plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) phenolics by spray Drying Technology and storage stability. Food Science and Technology. 2018;38(3):530-536. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457x.09817
102.Pandey S, Poonia A, Rai S. Optimization of spray drying conditions for the production of quality ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.) fruit powder. Nutrition and Food Science. 2019;49(6):1088-1098. https://doi.org/10.1108/NFS-12-2018-0339
ORCID IDs
Liew Phing Pui https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5305-4334
Abdul Kalam Saleena Lejaniya https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7852-8073
