CC BY
25Бюллетень науки и практики /Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 8. №4. 2022
https://www.bulletennauki.com https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/77
UDC 579; 632.4 https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/77/22
AGRIS H10
EFFECTS OF PHYTOPATHOGENIC FUNGI ON PLANTS (REVIEW)
©Sodikov B., ORCID: 0000-0002-4861-7187, Tashkent State Agrarian University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, bakhrom-2019@mail.ru ©Sodikova D., ORCID: 0000-0003-4734-1526, Denau Institute
for Entrepreneurship and Pedagogy, Denau, Uzbekistan ©Omonlikov A., ORCID: 0000-0002-2334-4098, Tashkent State Agrarian University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
ВЛИЯНИЕ ФИТОПАТОГЕННЫХ ГРИБОВ НА РАСТЕНИЯ (ОБЗОР)
©Содиков Б. С., ORCID: 0000-0002-4861-7187, Ташкентский государственный аграрный университет, г. Ташкент, Узбекистан, bakhrom-2019@mail.ru ©Содикова Д. Г., ORCID: 0000-0003-4734-1526, Денауский институт предпринимательства и педагогики, г. Денау, Узбекистан ©Омонликов А. Ю., ORCID: 0000-0002-2334-4098, Ташкентский государственный аграрный университет, г. Ташкент, Узбекистан
Abstract. This article outlines explanatory data on the interactions between phytopathogenic fungi and plants, as well as infestation ways of pathogenic fungi on plants. A thorough analysis of the literature revealed that phytopathogenic fungi use a number of biochemical and mechanical methods to penetrate into the plant tissues, including the production of cell wall-degrading enzymes, also use toxins, effector proteins, and growth regulators. Cell wall degrading enzymes (CWDEs) in pathogenesis are the main weapon of phytopathogenic fungi.
Аннотация. В статье приведены данные о взаимодействии фитопатогенных грибов с растениями, а также о путях заражения растений патогенными грибами. Тщательный анализ литературы показал, что для проникновения в ткани растений фитопатогенные грибы используют ряд биохимических и механических способов, в том числе продукцию ферментов, разрушающих клеточную стенку, а также используют токсины, эффекторные белки и регуляторы роста. Ферменты, разрушающие клеточную стенку (CWDE), в патогенезе являются основным оружием фитопатогенных грибов.
Keywords: phytopathogens, fungi, Fusarium, plant, disease, pathogen, phytotoxin, mycotoxin, enzyme, effector.
Ключевые слова: фитопатогены, грибы, Fusarium, растение, болезнь, возбудитель, фитотоксин, микотоксин, фермент, эффектор.
In recent years, the quantity and quality of agricultural crops have been declining under the influence of pests. This is due to the fact that pathogenic microorganisms are adapting to climatic conditions and effective control measures are not carried out in a timely manner. Development and
ff) ® I
b^HIH Тип лицензии CC: Attribution 4.0 International (CC B1 4.0) 192
Бюллетень науки и практики /Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 8. №4. 2022
https://www.bulletennauki.com https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/77
implementation of modern measures to combat pathogenic microorganisms will allow to obtain high and qualitative yields from agricultural crops [1-5].
Fungi are one of the main pathogens of plant diseases. Pathogenic fungi use a variety of methods to reproduce, spread, and cause disease in plants. Some fungi kill the host plant and feed on dead substances (necrotrophs), while others develop in living tissues (biotrophs). Fungi use a variety of virulent factors to reproduce and spread in the host plant. Depending on the method of damage, virulence factors perform different functions. While almost all pathogens disrupt the primary protection of plants, necrotrophs produce toxins to destroy plant tissue [6].
Phytopathogenic fungi can cause serious diseases that can adversely affect plant productivity. Some of these fungi have also been documented as human pathogens that can cause infectious diseases in immunocompromised individuals. In this context, the interaction of fungi with other organisms is of great interest because fungi use a number of biochemical and mechanical methods to penetrate and spread in nutrients. Produces enzymes or secondary metabolites that break down polymers as virulence factors during damage. In addition, fungi produce mycotoxins in plants, which pose a significant risk to human and animal health [7].
Effectors. Phytopathogenic fungi have evolved at different stages of life development to obtain and reproduce nutrients from the host plant during their coexistence with plants for millions of years. They use a variety of protein as well as protein-free molecules commonly called effectors to damage plant tissues. Effectors are important determinants of the virulence of pathogenic fungi and play an important role in successful pathogenesis. However, in addition to being important in pathogenesis, fungal effectors are eventually recognized by resistant plant varieties that produce a strong immune response to prevent pathogens. Various recent studies involving different pathosystems have identified the role of fungal effectors in controlling virulence / avirulence functions and the results of their plant-pathogen interactions. However, effectors and the plant resistance gene associated with them remain difficult for some economically important fungal diseases [8].
Cell wall degrading enzymes (CWDEs). One of the first barriers that phytopathogenic fungi must break down to enter plant tissue is the cell walls, which are composed primarily of carbohydrates. Many plant pathogenic fungi use special structures called appressoria to disrupt the cell wall [9-13].
Fungi typically produce enzymes belonging to five classes, namely glycosyl-hydrolases, glycocytransferases, polysaccharide lyases, carbohydrate esterases, and carbohydrate-active enzymes that accelerate the oxidation-reduction process with auxiliary activity [14]. Polysaccharide lyases, glycosyl-hydrolases, and carbohydrate esterases are used to break down the cell wall. Typically, pathogenic species of plants contain more of these genes than saprophytic pathogenic strains [10, 15].
Toxins. Fungal toxins are metabolic products of various chemical natures that have specific pathological effects on the human body, animals, plants and microorganisms. Phytotoxins stop or slow down plant growth, damage or destroy tissues, and are an important factor in the development of diseases [16-21].
To date, the effects of more than 350 species of toxinogenic fungi have been studied, including dozens of species of toxins produced by fungi of the Fusarium genus. Representatives of this genus produce the most dangerous mycotoxins for plants, animals and humans [17, 20-23].
The mycotoxins of the micromycetes of the Fusarium genus are usually not specific to one species. Strains of many species synthesize fusaric acid (a nitrogenous heterocyclic compound
Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 8. №4. 2022
https://www.bulletennauki.com https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/77
belonging to the group of nicotinic acids). Fusarium acid is highly toxic to various plant species and stops the growth of Bacillus subtilis, B. megaterium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus and other bacteria. This acid is formed in fungal mycelium and culture fluid and has different effects depending on the type of plant [20, 24-26].
Fusarium acid produces number of strains of Fusarium oxysporum, F. moniliforme, F. heterosporum, F. subglutinans, F. sambucinum, F. napiforme, F. crookwellense, F. solani fungi [20, 25].
Depending on the conditions and the level of toxicity of the producers, as well as the concentration in plant tissues, fusarium acid affects the conductive tubes of the plant in different ways. With a high dose of the toxin (100-200 mg/kg wet weight per hour), the conducting tubes are completely paralyzed and only half recover after 3-5 hours. At low doses (20 mg/kg) in the first stage of intoxication, the water supply to the tissues is increased and the plant does not suffer from water deficiency. After the appearance of necrosis in the tissues, as a result of the violation of water exchange in the second stage, the plant loses its turgor, i. e. the plant withers [17, 18, 20, 27, 26].
Plant growth regulators. When most pathogenic fungi penetrate into plant tissue, they begin to disrupt plant growth regulators such as auxin, cytokines, gibberel acid (GA), ethylene (ET), abscisic acid (ABA), brassinosteroids (BR), jasmonate acid (JA), as well as endogenous hormone levels in plants and produce salicylic acid (SA) to weaken plant protection [28]. Auxin-indolacetic acid, synthesized by the mycelium and conidia of Magnaporthe oryzae, may accelerate plant growth and weaken plant protection [29-31].
Cytokinin accelerates the growth of mycelium and spores of Harpophora maydis fungus and slows the growth of hyphae and spores of Fusarium oxysporum fungus. New drugs against phytopathogenic fungi can be developed by studying the methods of hormone synthesis and signaling methods of phytopathogenic fungi.
Over time, plants have developed a system of protection against a number of biotic and abiotic stresses, as natural systems produce many opposing forces on plants [32-34]. Different stress forces affect plants together, so any changes in a plant's metabolic physiology cannot be attributed to a specific stress factor. In the context of a particular stress, multiple response signals are used by the plant against the pathogen, and the response signal for both pathogens and insects are interrelated [35, 36]. Some of this response signal is caused by a pathogenic fungus and some is carried out regardless of its antagonistic nature. The formation of enzymes by pathogen to break down the cell wall and the synthesis of polymer barriers that prevent the entry of the pathogen is one of the main means of plant protection [37].
One of the barriers that phytopathogenic fungi must enter to break down plant tissue and damage the plant is the cell walls, which are mostly made up of carbohydrates. They usually use different methods to disrupt cell walls. Some pathogenic fungi produce carbohydrate-active enzymes that accelerate the redox process [38-40].
Through an in-depth study of the properties of phytopathogenic fungi, it serves as a basis for a better understanding of plant diseases and their effective control. However, the mechanisms of interaction between fungi and plants have been little studied. Today, the study of the interaction of plant and pathogenic fungi is one of the major issues facing phytopathologists.
Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 8. №4. 2022
https://www.bulletennauki.com https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/77
References:
1. Sodikov B. (2018). Chemical protection of Helianthus annuus L. from Botrytis cinerea Pers. Bulletin of science and practice, 4(10), 219-222. (in Russian).
2. Sodikov, B. S., & Khuzhaev, O. T. (2019). Khimicheskaya zashchita podsolnechnika ot al'ternarioza. Aktual'nye problemy sovremennoi nauki, (4), 188-191. (in Russian).
3. Sodikov, B. S., & Omonlikov, A. (2022). Yangi fungitsidlarning biologik samaradorligini urganish. Yangi O'zbekistonda milliy taraqqiyot va innovasiyalar, 380-385. (in Uzbek).
4. Sodikov, B., Rakhmonov, U., & Khamiraev, O. (2021). Phytopthora infestans zambururining fitotoksik va patogenlik khususiyatlarini urganish // Agro kimyo himoya va o'simliklar karantini, (2), 69-71. (in Uzbek).
5. Sodikov, B., Khamiraev, U. & Omonlikov, A. (2022). Usimliklarni khimoya kilishda yangi fungitsidlarni kullash. Obshchestvo i Innovatsii, 2(12/S) 334-342. (in Uzbek). https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol2-iss12/S-pp334-342
6. Doehlemann, G., Okmen, B., Zhu, W., & Sharon, A. (2017). Plant pathogenic fungi. Microbiology spectrum, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0023-2016
7. Salvatore, M. M., & Andolfi, A. (2021). Phytopathogenic Fungi and Toxicity. Toxins, 13(10), 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13100689
8. Pradhan, A., Ghosh, S., Sahoo, D., & Jha, G. (2021). Fungal effectors, the double edge sword of phytopathogens. Current genetics, 67(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-020-01118-3
9. Kleemann, J., Rincon-Rivera, L. J., Takahara, H., Neumann, U., van Themaat, E. V. L., van der Does, H. C., ... & O'Connell, R. J. (2012). Sequential delivery of host-induced virulence effectors by appressoria and intracellular hyphae of the phytopathogen Colletotrichum higginsianum. PLoSpathogens, 8(4), e1002643. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002643
10. Rodriguez-Moreno, L., Ebert, M. K., Bolton, M. D., & Thomma, B. P. (2018). Tools of the crook-infection strategies of fungal plant pathogens. The Plant Journal, 93(4), 664-674. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13810
11. Ryder, L. S., & Talbot, N. J. (2015). Regulation of appressorium development in pathogenic fungi. Current opinion in plant biology, 26, 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.pbi.2015.05.013
12. Sodikov, B. S., Kholmuradov, E. A., & Avazov, S. E. (2018). White rot disease of sunflower plant and its control. Journal of agrochemical protection and plant quarantine, (5), 5455.
13. Sodikov B. S. (2019). Chemical protection of sunflower from downy mildew.
14. Lombard, V., Golaconda Ramulu, H., Drula, E., Coutinho, P. M., & Henrissat, B. (2014). The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic acids research, 42(D1), D490-D495. https://doi .org/10.1093/nar/gkt1178
15. Zhao, Z., Liu, H., Wang, C., & Xu, J. R. (2014). Erratum to comparative analysis of fungal genomes reveals different plant cell wall degrading capacity in fungi. BMC genomics, 15(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-6
Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 8. №4. 2022
https://www.bulletennauki.com https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/77
16. Avazov, S., & Sodikov, B. (2020). White rot diseases of sunflower and measures against them. Society & innovation, 1(2), 23-28. (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol1-iss2-pp23-28
17. Bilai, V. I. (1955). Fuzarii: (Biologiya i sistematika). Kiev. (in Russian).
18. Bilai, V. I. (1965). Biologicheski aktivnye veshchestva mikroskopicheskikh gribov i ikh primenenie. Kiev. (in Russian).
19. Bilai, V. I. (1973). Metody eksperimental'noi mikologii. Kiev. (in Russian).
20. Litovka, Yu. A. (2003). Vidovoi sostav gribov roda Fusarium i ikh rol' v patogeneze seyantsev khvoinykh v lesopitomnikakh Srednei Sibiri: authoref. Ph.D. diss. Krasnoyarsk. (in Russian).
21. Placinta, C. M., D'Mello, J. F., & Macdonald, A. M. C. (1999). A review of worldwide contamination of cereal grains and animal feed with Fusarium mycotoxins. Animal feed science and technology, 75(1-2), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00278-8
22. Nikulenko, T. F., & Chkanikov, D. I. (1987). Toksiny fitopatogennykh gribov i ikh rol' v razvitii boleznei rastenii. Moscow. (in Russian).
23. Sarkisov, A. Kh. (1984). Mikotoksikozy cheloveka i zhivotnykh: (Epidemiologiya, etiologiya, patogenez). Moscow. (in Russian).
24. Monastyrskii, O. A. (1996). Toksiny fitopatogennykh gribov. Zashchita i karantin rastenii, 3, 12-14. (in Russian).
25. Bacon, C. W., Porter, J. K., Norred, W. P., & Leslie, J. (1996). Production of fusaric acid by Fusarium species. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 62(11), 4039-4043. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.62.! 1.4039-4043.1996
26. Miller, J. D., Savard, M. E., Sibilia, A., Rapior, S., Hocking, A. D., & Pitt, J. I. (1993). Production of fumonisins and fusarins by Fusarium moniliforme from Southeast Asia. Mycologia, 55(3), 385-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1993.12026290
27. Kern, H. (1972). Phytotoxins produced by Fusaria. Phytotoxins in Plant Diseases; Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute.
28. Jaroszuk-Scisel, J., Tyskiewicz, R., Nowak, A., Ozimek, E., Majewska, M., Hanaka, A., ... & Janusz, G. (2019). Phytohormones (auxin, gibberellin) and ACC deaminase in vitro synthesized by the mycoparasitic Trichoderma DEMTkZ3A0 strain and changes in the level of auxin and plant resistance markers in wheat seedlings inoculated with this strain conidia. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(19), 4923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194923
29. Fu, S. F., Wei, J. Y., Chen, H. W., Liu, Y. Y., Lu, H. Y., & Chou, J. Y. (2015). Indole-3-acetic acid: A widespread physiological code in interactions of fungi with other organisms. Plant signaling & behavior, 10(8), e1048052. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2015.1048052
30. Krause, K., Henke, C., Asiimwe, T., Ulbricht, A., Klemmer, S., Schachtschabel, D., ... & Kothe, E. (2015). Biosynthesis and secretion of indole-3-acetic acid and its morphological effects on Tricholoma vaccinum-spruce ectomycorrhiza. Applied and environmental microbiology, 51(20), 7003-7011. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01991-15
31. Cheng, J., Peng, Y., Yan, J., Zhou, M. L., Tang, Y., Gao, A. J., ... & Zhou, M. (2021). Research Progress in Phytopathogenic Fungi and Their Role as Biocontrol Agents. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12, 1209. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.670135
Бюллетень науки и практики /Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 8. №4. 2022
https://www.bulletennauki.com https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/77
32. Ballhorn, D. J., Kautz, S., Heil, M., & Hegeman, A. D. (2009). Cyanogenesis of wild lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) is an efficient direct defense in nature. PLoS One, 4(5), e5450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005450
33. Khakimov, A. A., Omonlikov, A. U., & Utaganov, S. B. U. (2020). Current status and prospects of the use of biofungicides against plant diseases. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 13(3), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2020.13.3.0403
34. Khakimov, A., Salakhutdinov, I., Omonlikov, A., & Utaganov, S. (2022). Traditional and current-prospective methods of agricultural plant diseases detection: A review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 951, no. 1. IOP Publishing, 012002.
35. Agosta, W. (1996). Bombardier Beetles and Fever Trees: A Close-up Look at Chemical Warfare and Signals in Animals and Plants. Reading, Addison-Wesley, 224.
36. Kusnierczyk, A., Winge, P., Midelfart, H., Armbruster, W. S., Rossiter, J. T., & Bones, A. M. (2007). Transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes with different glucosinolate profiles after attack by polyphagous Myzus persicae and oligophagous Brevicoryne brassicae. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(10), 2537-2552. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm043
37. Hammond-Kosack, K. E., & Jones, J. D. G. (1996). Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses. The Plant Cell, 8(10), 1773. https://doi.org/10.2307/3870229
38. Sattarovich, S. B., Normamadovich, R. U., Kakhramonovich, K. U., & Mirodilovich, A. M. (2020). Fungal diseases of sunflower and measures against them. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(6), 3268-3279.
39. Sodikov, B., Khamiraev, U., & Omonlikov, A. (2022). Application of New Fungicides Against the Diseases of Agricultural Crops. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 8(2), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/75/15
40. Sodikov, B. S. (2019). Fungal diseases of sunflower and measures to combat them: abstract. Ph.D. diss. Tashkent.
Список литературы:
1. Содиков Б. С. Химическая защита Helianthus annum L. от Botrytis cinerea Pers. // Бюллетень науки и практики. 2018. Т. 4. №10. С. 219-222.
2. Содиков Б. С., Хужаев О. Т. Химическая защита подсолнечника от альтернариоза // Актуальные проблемы современной науки. 2019. №4. С. 188-191.
3. Содиков Б. С., Омонликов А. Янги фунгицидларнинг биологик самарадорлигини урганиш // Yangi O'zbekistonda milliy taraqqiyot va innovasiyalar. 2022. С. 380-385.
4. Содиков Б., Рахмонов У, Хамираев У. Phytopthora infestans замбуругининг фитотоксик ва патогенлик хусусиятларини урганиш // Agro kimyo himoya va o'simliklar karantini. 2021. №2. Б. 69-71.
5. Содиков Б., Хамираев У, Омонликов А. Усимликларни х,имоя килишда янги фунгицидларни куллаш // Общество и инновации. 2022. Т. 2. №12/S. С. 334-342. https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol2-iss12/S-pp334-342
6. Doehlemann G., Okmen B., Zhu W., Sharon A. Plant pathogenic fungi // Microbiology spectrum. 2017. V. 5. №1. P. 5.1. 14. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0023-2016
Бюллетень науки и практики /Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 8. №4. 2022
https://www.bulletennauki.com https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/77
7. Salvatore M. M., Andolfi A. Phytopathogenic Fungi and Toxicity // Toxins. 2021. V. 13. №10. P. 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13100689
8. Pradhan A., Ghosh S., Sahoo D., Jha G. Fungal effectors, the double edge sword of phytopathogens // Current genetics. 2021. V. 67. №1. P. 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-020-01118-3
9. Kleemann J., Rincon-Rivera L. J., Takahara H., Neumann U., van Themaat E. V. L., van der Does H. C., O'Connell R. J. Sequential delivery of host-induced virulence effectors by appressoria and intracellular hyphae of the phytopathogen Colletotrichum higginsianum // PLoS pathogens. 2012. V. 8. №4. P. e1002643. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002643
10. Rodriguez-Moreno L., Ebert M. K., Bolton M. D., Thomma B. P. Tools of the crook-infection strategies of fungal plant pathogens // The Plant Journal. 2018. V. 93. №4. P. 664-674. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13810
11. Ryder L. S., Talbot N. J. Regulation of appressorium development in pathogenic fungi // Current opinion in plant biology. 2015. V. 26. P. 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2015.05.013
12. Sodikov B. S., Kholmuradov E. A., Avazov S. E. White rot disease of sunflower plant and its control // Journal of agrochemical protection and plant quarantine. 2018. №5. P. 54-55.
13. Sodikov B. S. Chemical protection of sunflower from downy mildew. 2019.
14. Lombard V., Golaconda Ramulu H., Drula E., Coutinho P. M., Henrissat B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013 // Nucleic acids research. 2014. V. 42. №D1. P. D490-D495. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1178
15. Zhao Z., Liu H., Wang C., Xu J. R. Erratum to: comparative analysis of fungal genomes reveals different plant cell wall degrading capacity in fungi // BMC genomics. 2014. V. 15. №1. P. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-6
16. Авазов С., Содиков Б. Белая гниль подсолнечника и меры борьбы с ними // Общество и инновации. 2020. Т. 1. №2. C. 23-28. https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol1-iss2-pp23-28.
17. Билай В. И. Фузарии: (Биология и систематика). Киев: Изд-во Акад. наук УССР, 1955. 320 с.
18. Билай В. И. Биологически активные вещества микроскопических грибов и их применение. Киев: Наукова думка, 1965. 267 с.
19. Билай В. И. Методы экспериментальной микологии. Киев: Наук. думка, 1973. 242 с.
20. Литовка Ю. А. Видовой состав грибов рода Fusarium и их роль в патогенезе сеянцев хвойных в лесопитомниках Средней Сибири: автореф. дисс. ... канд. биол. наук. Красноярск, 2003. 18 с.
21. Placinta C. M., D'Mello J. P. F., Macdonald A. M. C. A review of worldwide contamination of cereal grains and animal feed with Fusarium mycotoxins // Animal feed science and technology. 1999. V. 78. №1-2. P. 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00278-8
22. Никуленко Т. Ф., Чкаников Д. И. Токсины фитопатогенных грибов и их роль в развитии болезней растений. М.: ВНИИТЭИагропром, 1987. 52 с.
23. Саркисов А. Х. Микотоксикозы человека и животных: (Эпидемиология, этиология, патогенез). М.: Центр междунар. проектов ГКНТ, 1984. 18 с.
Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 8. №4. 2022
https://www.bulletennauki.com https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/77
24. Монастырский О. А. Токсины фитопатогенных грибов // Защита и карантин растений. 1996. Т. 3. С. 12-14.
25. Bacon C. W., Porter J. K., Norred W. P., Leslie J. Production of fusaric acid by Fusarium species // Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1996. V. 62. №11. P. 4039-4043. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.62.! 1.4039-4043.1996
26. Miller J. D., Savard M. E., Sibilia A., Rapior S., Hocking A. D., Pitt J. I. Production of fumonisins and fusarins by Fusarium moniliforme from Southeast Asia // Mycologia. 1993. V. 85. №3. P. 385-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1993.12026290
27. Kern H. Phytotoxins produced by Fusaria // Phytotoxins in Plant Diseases; Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute. 1972.
28. Jaroszuk-Scisel J., Tyskiewicz R., Nowak A., Ozimek E., Majewska M., Hanaka A., Janusz G. Phytohormones (auxin, gibberellin) and ACC deaminase in vitro synthesized by the mycoparasitic Trichoderma DEMTkZ3A0 strain and changes in the level of auxin and plant resistance markers in wheat seedlings inoculated with this strain conidia // International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019. V. 20. №19. P. 4923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194923
29. Fu S. F., Wei J. Y., Chen H. W., Liu Y. Y., Lu H. Y., Chou J. Y. Indole-3-acetic acid: A widespread physiological code in interactions of fungi with other organisms // Plant signaling & behavior. 2015. V. 10. №8. P. e1048052. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2015.1048052
30. Krause K., Henke C., Asiimwe T., Ulbricht A., Klemmer S., Schachtschabel D., Kothe E. Biosynthesis and secretion of indole-3-acetic acid and its morphological effects on Tricholoma vaccinum-spruce ectomycorrhiza // Applied and environmental microbiology. 2015. V. 81. №20. P. 7003-7011. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01991-15
31. Cheng J., Peng Y., Yan J., Zhou M. L., Tang Y., Gao A. J., Zhou M. Research Progress in Phytopathogenic Fungi and Their Role as Biocontrol Agents // Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021. V.
12. P. 1209. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.670135
32. Ballhorn D. J., Kautz S., Heil M., Hegeman A. D. Cyanogenesis of wild lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) is an efficient direct defense in nature // PLoS One. 2009. V. 4. №5. P. e5450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005450
33. Khakimov A. A., Omonlikov A. U., Utaganov S. B. U. Current status and prospects of the use of biofungicides against plant diseases // GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2020. V.
13. №3. P. 119-126. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2020.13.3.0403
34. Khakimov A., Salakhutdinov I., Omonlikov A., Utaganov S. Traditional and current-prospective methods of agricultural plant diseases detection: A review // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, 2022. V. 951. №1. P. 012002.
35. Agosta W. Bombardier Beetles and Fever Trees: A Close-up Look at Chemical Warfare and Signals in Animals and Plants. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1996. 224 p.
36. Kusnierczyk A., Winge P., Midelfart H., Armbruster W. S., Rossiter J. T., Bones A. M. Transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes with different glucosinolate profiles after attack by polyphagous Myzus persicae and oligophagous Brevicoryne brassicae // Journal of Experimental Botany. 2007. V. 58. №10. P. 2537-2552. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm043
37. Hammond-Kosack K. E., Jones J. D. G. Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses // The Plant Cell. 1996. V. 8. №10. P. 1773. https://doi.org/10.2307/3870229
Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice https://www.bulletennauki.com
Т. 8. №4. 2022 https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/77
38. Sattarovich S. B., Normamadovich R. U., Kakhramonovich K. U., Mirodilovich A. M. Fungal diseases of sunflower and measures against them // PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology. 2020. V. 17. №6. P. 3268-3279.
39. Sodikov B., Khamiraev U., Omonlikov A. Application of New Fungicides Against the Diseases of Agricultural Crops // Бюллетень науки и практики. 2022. Т. 8. №2. С. 110-117. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/75/15
40. Содиков Б. С. Грибковые болезни подсолнечника и меры борьбы с ними: автореф. дисс. ... канд. с.-х. наук. Ташкент, 2019.
Работа поступила в редакцию 20.03.2022 г.
Принята к публикации 23.03.2022 г.
Ссылка для цитирования:
Sodikov B., Sodikova D., Omonlikov A. Effects of Phytopathogenic Fungi on Plants
(Review) // Бюллетень науки и практики. 2022. Т. 8. №4. С. 192-200. https://doi .org/10.33619/2414-2948/77/22
Cite as (APA):
Sodikov, B., Sodikova, D., & Omonlikov, A. (2022). Effects of Phytopathogenic Fungi on Plants (Review). Bulletin of Science and Practice, 5(4), 192-200. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/77/22
