CC BY
02019, Science line Publication
World's Veterinary Journal
World Vet J, 9(2): 90-101, June 25, 2019
https://dx.doi.org/10.36380/scil.2019.wyj13
Effect of Early Heat Shock Exposure on Physiological Responses and Reproduction of Rabbits under Hot Desert Conditions
Osama Galal Sakr1, Baliegh Hamdy Mousa2, Khamis Refaay Said Emam3, Ali Saber Morsy2* and Nagwa Abd El-Hady Ahmed1
'Animal Production Department, Faculty of agriculture, Cairo University, Egypt 2Animal and Poultry Physiology Department, Desert Research Center, Egypt
3Animal and poultry production department, Faculty of environment and biological agriculture and food processing, Beni-Suef University, Egypt ♦Corresponding author's Email: alisaber_drc@yahoo.com; ORCID: 0000-0003-4252-2088
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to apply early heat shock exposure programs for releasing HSP70 gene expression to improve production of rabbits reared under hot desert conditions at Egypt. 120 Hi-Plus rabbits, one-day old were randomly divided into six equal treatments (20 rabbits/ treatment), namely T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6. T1 served as control. The rabbits of second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth treatments were exposed to heat shock (36±1 °C for 3 hours from 12:00 - 15:00 for three successive days). Rabbits of T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 were exposed to heat shock at 3, 25, 60, 3+25 and 3+25+60 days of age, respectively. HSP70 expression and tri-iodothyronine hormone in the rabbits of T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 were significantly increased. Rectal and fur temperatures, respiration rate, alanine transaminase, corticosterone hormone levels and overall mortality rate significantly decreased in the rabbits exposed to heat s ho programs. Red blood cells count, packed cell volume and hemoglobin concentration increased in the rabbits of T2, T3 and T4. Total protein and globulin concentrations increased in the rabbits of T5 when compared to the rabbits of T1, T2 and T6. However, rabbits of T2 and T4 showed an increase in total antioxidant capacity when compared to the rabbits of T1. Conception rate was higher in the does of T5 than that in T3, T4 and T6. Litter traits, productive efficiency index, feed conversion and cost of feeding improved in the rabbits exposed to heat shock programs. In conclusion, applying heat shock exposure programs of rabbits especially T3 treatment, might increase HSP70 gene expression, this led to enhance immunity responses and production under severe heat stress conditions. Key words: Heat stress, HSP70, Physiological responses, Productive and reproductive performance, Rabbits
INTRODUCTION
In Egypt, rabbit production suffered from heat stress conditions which considered as one of the important environmental stressors challenging rabbit production especially in desert areas (Morsy et al., 2011 and Nagwa et al., 2012). Many authors reported the deleterious effects of heat stress on physiological responses, productive and reproductive performance of rabbits (Sakr, 2003; Abdel-Samee et al., 2005 and Morsy, 2007).
Exposure of rabbits to heat stress conditions led to modulate their physiological responses to dissipate the latent heat (Morsy, 2007). Marai et al. (1994 and 1996) and Lebas et al. (1997) reported that rabbit's heat production and losses vary to maintain body temperature by using three devices for heat loss; general body position, respiration rate and peripheral temperature (temperature of ear). Under severe heat stress, rabbits use strategies that include; depression in feed intake, efficiency of feed utilization, disturbances in water, protein, energy and mineral metabolism balances, enzymatic reactions, hormonal secretions, blood metabolites and depressed immune function (Nagwa et al., 2005; Morsy, 2007 and Morsy et al., 2011).
Heat stress conditions accompanied with a peak of mortality rate in rabbits. Many authors reported 25-75 % increase of mortality rate in rabbits reared under hot weather conditions of Egypt and may be attributed this higher percentage to inability of regulate body temperature under heat stress conditions (Nagwa et al., 2005; Morsy, 2007 and Morsy et al., 2011). Currently, heat shock exposure programs during earlier age are alternative practice to increase thermo-tolerance and acclimate rabbits to heat stress conditions which led to minimize heat-related mortality, enhance productive and reproductive performance, feed conversion and enhance immune responses (Yalcin et al., 2001; De Basilio et al., 2003; Rahimi, 2005; Hanan, 2006; Faisal et al., 2008; El-Badry et al., 2009; Star et al., 2009; Zulkifli et al., 2009; El-Moniary et al., 2010; Nagwa et al., 2012; Emam, 2013; Morsy, 2013 and Morsy, 2018). Heat Shock Proteins (HSP's) have been noticed in every cell type and tissues. Exposure of rabbits to heat stress conditions during growth
i
t < e 5 d :
. 9
0
R
1
HH
2 A L
A R T
HH
C L E
90
period led to induce HSP70. Members of HSP70 protein family act as chaperone, which assists in the folding, transport and assembly of protein in cytoplasm, mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum or appears to play a critical role in protecting cells against the adverse effects of hyperthermia, helps newly synthesized proteins fold (Morimoto et al., 1990). Therefore, this study aimed to release the HSP70 gene expression by applying heat shock exposure programs at early ages and investigate its effects on physiological responses, productive and reproductive performance of Hi-Plus rabbits under hot desert conditions of South Sinai, Egypt during production period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experimental region
The present study was carried out in South Sinai research station, located at Ras Suder that belongs to the desert research center, ministry of agriculture and land reclamation, Egypt. The experiment started at January 2016 up to August 2016. Laboratory work was carried out in the laboratories compound of desert research center.
Ethical approval
This experiment was performed according to all ethics and animal rights (desert research center, Egypt). As much as this work had considering all rules and regulations in conformity with the European union directive for the protection of experimental animals (2010/63/EU).
Experimental animals and feeding and management
The experimental rabbits were kept under the same managerial, hygienic conditions and examined clinically safe and free from internal and external parasites. Rabbits were vaccinned to keep them healthy. At production period, rabbits were individually housed in standard dimensions (50*60*40 cm) wired metallic cages attached with nest box (40*30*27 cm) for kindling and nursing. Cages were equipped with feeding hoppers. The rabbits fed, ad-libitum, a commercial concentrate pelleted diet containing 18.0% crude protein, 16.0% crude fiber, 2.5% fat, 0.6% minerals mixture and 2600 kcal/kg digestible energy according to NRC (1994). Fresh water was available all day through nipples drinker system.
Experimental design
120 one-day old of Hi-Plus rabbits were randomly divided into six equal treatments (20 rabbits/treatment). The first treatment (T1) served as control (non-exposure to heat shock program). The rabbits of second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth treatments were exposed to heat shock program (36±1 °C for 3 hours from 12:00 to 15:00 for three successive days). The second treatment (T2) exposed at three days of age, the third treatment (T3) exposed at 25 days of age, the fourth treatment (T4) exposed at 60 days of age, the fifth treatment (T5) was exposed at 3 and 25 days of age and the sixth treatment (T6) exposed at 3, 25 and 60 days of age. After the end of heat shock exposure all treatments returned to be reared under natural conditions. During productive period, all treatments reared under heat stress conditions.
Ambient temperature and relative humidity
Table 1 indicated monthly indoor climatic conditions recorded during the experimental period using electronic digital thermo-hygrometer (Model 303, China). The relationship between ambient temperature and relative humidity was termed as Temperature-Humidity Index (THI) and calculated according to Marai et al. (2001).
THI = db°C - [(0.31 - 0.31 * RH) * (db°C - 14.4)]
Where, db°C = dry bulb temperature in centigrade and RH = relative humidity %. The THI values were classified as absence of heat stress (<27.8), moderate heat stress (27.8-28.8), severe heat stress (28.9-29.9) and very severe heat stress (>30.0).
Table 1. Indoor ambient temperature, relative humidity and temperature-humidity index throughout experimental period under conditions of South Sinai, Egypt
Months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
Minimum AT (0C)
9.3±0.54 10.6±0.88 12.2±0.50 13.4±0.87 19.4±0.63 24.1±0.24 23.8±0.81 25.1±0.61
Maximum AT(0C)
18.1±0.38 17.9±0.66 21.1±0.55 26.0±1.11 30.2±0.44 33.9±0.48 35.6±0.78 35.9±0.71
Minimum RH
(%)
34.2±1.24 31.2±1.09 33.1±1.53 31.0±1.88 27.2±2.11 25.9±1.22 25.3±1.98 29.8±1.65
Maximum RH
(%)
58.3±2.30 57.2±1.11 53.6±0.99 43.9±1.65 46.5±1.32 41.6±1.43 42.1±2.10 49.6±1.60
Minimum THI
10.3±0.54 11.4±0.57 12.7±0.53 13.6±0.87 18.3±0.52 21.9±0.22 21.6±0.55 22.8±0.37
Maximum THI
17.6±0.82
17.4±0.63
20.1±0.33
24.0±1.1
27.6±0.38
30.4±0.35
31.8±0.66
32.5±0.81
AT= ambient temperature, RH= relative humidity, THI= temperature humidity index
91
Thermo-respiratory responses
Thermo-respiratory responses of rabbits were randomly measured on 10 rabbits / treatment during production period. The measurements were monthly recorded at 2:00 pm. Rectal Temperature (RT) was measured by inserting a clinical thermometer two cm in the rectum for one minute. Temperatures of Skin (ST), Fur Temperatures (FT) and Ear Temperatures (ET) were recorded using digital tele-thermometer Digitemp D2000/D2010 (Morsy et al., 2011). Respiration rate (breaths/min) was determined by counting the frequency of flank movements/minute (Nagwa et al., 2012).
Blood samples
Monthly blood samples were taken from the marginal ear vein into EDTA treated tubes (five rabbits/treatment). Hemoglobin (Hb) concentration, Red Blood Cells (RBC's) count and Packed Cell Volume (PCV%) were determined immediately by the coulter (HA-VET, Clinding, Belgium). Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH), and Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) were calculated by the following equations: MCH (in pico gram, pg) = (Hb content g/dl * 10) / RBCs in million. MCHC (%) = (Hb content * 100) / PCV %. MCV (femtoliter, fl) = (PCV % * 10)/ RBCs in million. The rest of the blood was centrifuged for 15 minutes at 3500 rpm to collect plasma before being stored at -70° Celesius for determination of HSP70, blood hormones (progesterone, corticosterone and tri-iodothyronine) and blood metabolites (total protein, albumin, glucose, cholesterol, alanine transaminase, aspartic transaminase and total antioxidant capacity). Blood metabolites were determined calorimetrically by using commercial kits. Concentration of HSP70 was determined by ELISA kit of Uscn Life Science Inc. Wuhan, Chain. Specificity of this assay has high sensitivity and excellent specificity for detection of gallinaceous HSP70. Concentrations of tri-iodothyronine, corticosterone and progesterone hormones were determined by ELISA kits of Monobind Inc. Lake Forest, USA.
Reproductive and productive performance
Conception rate (%), number of services per conception were calculated. Gestation period (day) and litter traits were recorded. Milk yield of the doe was estimated by deprivation of the litters from suckling for 24 hours. The litters were weighed before and after suckling and the increase in litters' weight was used as the doe milk yield. Stillbirth (%), pre-weaning mortality (%) and overall of mortality rate (%) were recorded.
Daily feed intake (g) was measured (offered diet-residual diet), total feed intake (Kg)= daily feed intake*123 days. Productive efficiency index (kg, live weight) = litter size at weaning* number of parities * total weaning weight (kg), cost of feed for producing one Kg live weight of rabbit = feed conversion * price of one kg feed and feed conversion of doe = total feed intake (kg) of doe / productive efficiency index (kg, live weight) of doe were calculated.
Average Daily Gain (ADG) and Relative Growth Rate (RGR) were calculated throughout the suckling period (28 days). ADG = (weaning weight - birth weight) /28 days. RGR = [(weaning weight - birth weight)/ 0.5* (weaning weight +birth weight)] * 100.
Statistical analysis
Data was analyzed by the least square analysis of variance using the General Linear Model Procedure (SAS, 2004). The model was as follows: YiJ= ^ + Ti + eiJ
YiJ= Any observations of ith rabbit within jth treatment
^ = Overall mean
Ti = Effect of i* treatment, (i: 1-6)
eij = Standard error
All statements of significance are based a probability of less than 0.05. Significant differences among means were tested using Duncan multiple range test (Duncan, 1955). Mortality rate of does was analyzed by Chi square analysis.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Heat shock protein 70
Early heat exposure program significantly (P< 0.05) increased HSP70 expression (Figure 1) in the rabbits of T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 by (27.5-42.5 %) as compared to the rabbits of T1 (control group). This result exhibited that early heat exposure program may increase HSP70 expression and might suggesting the proteins involved in the stress caused by heat shock exposure in the rabbits (Maak et al., 2003; Hanan, 2006; Nagwa et al., 2012; Emam, 2013 and Morsy, 2018). Release of HSP70 during heat stress conditions may play an important role in protecting stressed cells and reversing disorders caused by stress through acts as a molecular chaperone by binding to other cellular proteins, assisting intracellular transport and folding into the proper secondary structures and thus preventing aggregation of protein during
92
stress (Chirico et al., 1988 and Li and Werb, 1982) and hence it may positively return on rabbit's performance (Abd El-Kafy et al., 2008).
Figure 1. Effect of heat shock programs on formation of heat shock proteins 70 in Hi-Plus rabbits under conditions of South Sinai, Egypt. T1 = control, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 = rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 3 days, at 25 days of age, at 2 months of age, at 3 days + 25 days of age and at 3 days + 25 days + 2 months of age, respectively, HSP70 = heat shock protein 70, ^ b different superscripts among groups means significant (P< 0.05).
Thermo-respiratory responses
RT decreased (P< 0.05) in the rabbits of T3, T5 and T6 by about 0.63, 0.57 and 0.75 oC, respectively as compared with control group (Table 2). Indeed, FT and RR significantly (P< 0.05) decreased in the rabbits exposed to heat shock programs (T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6) by about 1.1 - 1.5 oC and 8.7 - 16.7 %, respectively as compared to the rabbits in T1. However, no significant (P> 0.05) differences were detected between treatments in ST and ET.
These results advice that early heat exposure and release HSP70 may enhance thermo-tolerance of rabbits exposed to heat stress at later age (Nagwa et al., 2012 and Morsy, 2013) that enable rabbits to cope any exposure to unexpected heat waves at later ages. Also, the HSP70 may play a critical role in cellular homeostasis during development of thermo-tolerance (Hahn and Li, 1990; Yahav and Hurwitz, 1996; Zhou et al., 1996; Yahav and Mc-Murtry, 2001; Morsy, 2013 and 2018). On the other hand, Abdel-Kafy et al. (2008) reported that the reduction of the RT in the rabbits exposed to heat shock program (34oC) may be due to the fact that rabbits were able to maintain constant RT during heat exposure by low metabolic rate when previously acclimated to high temperature. These results agree with the results of Faisal et al. (2008); El-Badry et al. (2009); Star et al. (2009); Zulkifli et al. 2009 and El-Moniary et al. (2010), they used heat shock exposure programs to acclimate birds to heat stress and enhance some physiological responses of birds.
Table 2. Effect of heat shock programs on thermo -respiratory responses of Hi-Plus rabbits in South Sinai, Egypt.
Items T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 ±SE
Rectal temperature (oC) 39.5a 39.2abc 38.9c 39.4ab 39.0bc 38.8c 0.13
Fur temperature (oC) 34.5a 33.3b 33.3b 33.4b 33.2b 33.0b 0.32
Skin temperature (oC) 36.5 35.7 35.5 35.7 35.5 35.8 0.32
Ear temperature (oC) 37.8 37.5 37.5 37.4 37.5 37.2 0.22
Respiration rate (breath/min.) 185.3a 169.2b 165.1bc 154.2c 162.5bc 163.7bc 3.8
T1 = control, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 = rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 3 days, at 25 days of age, at 2 months of age, at 3 days + 25 days of age and at 3 days + 25 days + 2 months of age, respectively, ±SE = standard error, ^ c Means bearing different superscripts within the same row are significantly different (P< 0.05).
Hematological parameters
WBC's count decreased (P< 0.05) in the rabbits of T2, T3 and T4 by 29.9, 37.6 and 25.1%, respectively as compared to the rabbits of T1 (Table 3). However, RBC's count and PCV increased (P<0.05) in the rabbits of T2 (by 15.5 and 19.8%, respectively), T3 (by 12.2 and 15.2%, respectively) and T4 (by 15.0 and 19.4%, respectively) when compared to the rabbits of T1. In addition, Hb concentration increased (P<0.05) in the rabbits of T2, T3, T4 and T6 by 14.6, 13.4, 14.8 and 15.1%, respectively as compared to the rabbits of T1. However, MCH increased (P<0.05) in the rabbits of T6 by (10.9%) compared with control group (Table 3). There are insignificant (P<0.05) effects of treatments on MCV and MCHC. Enhancement in hematological parameters might attribute to enhancement in the thermo-respiratory responses of rabbits exposed to heat shock exposure (Morsy, 2013). On the other hand, Nagwa et al. (2012); Emam (2013) and Morsy (2018) demonstrated that exposure of hens to heat stress conditions might impair the synthesis of blood cells. Yahav et al. (1997a) reported that hemoglobin increased in acclimated chickens compared with un-acclimated chickens.
93
Table 3. Effect of heat shock programs on hematological parameters of Hi-Plus rabbits in South Sinai, Egypt
Items T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 ±SE
WBC's (x103/mm3) 10.2a 7.1bc 6.4c 7.6bc 9 9ab 8.2abc 0.66
RBC's (x106/mm3) 4.8b 5.6a 5.4a 5.5 a 5.0 ab 5.0 ab 0.22
Hb (g/dl) 9.9b 11.4a 11.3 a 11.4 a 10.7 ab 11.4 a 0.36
PCV (%) 31.0b 37.1a 35.7 a 37.0a 33.3ab 33.0 ab 1.7
MCV (fl) 64.2 66.8 66.3 66.4 65.9 65.4 1.9
MCH (pg) 20.7b 21.1ab 21.6 ab 20.9 ab 21.3 ab 23.0a 0.64
MCHC (%) 33.1 31.9 32.6 31.9 32.8 35.4 1.2
T1 = control, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 = rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 3 days, at 25 days of age, at 2 months of age, at 3 days + 25 days of age and at 3 days + 25 days + 2 months of age, respectively ±SE = standard error, WBC's = white blood cells, RBC's = red blood cells, Hb =hemoglobin, PCV= packed cell volume, MCV= mean corpuscular volume, MCH= mean corpuscular hemoglobin, MCHC= mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, ^ c Means bearing different superscripts within the same row are significantly different (P< 0.05).
Metabolites parameters
Total protein and globulin concentrations increased (P< 0.05) in the rabbits of T5 group when compared to the rabbits of T1, T2 and T6 groups (Table 4). Cholesterol concentration significantly (P< 0.05) decreased in the rabbits of T6 group as compared to the rabbits of T4 group. Alanine transaminase concentration decreased (P< 0.05) in the rabbits of T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 groups (11.9, 12.5, 14.4, 17.1 and 17.7 %, respectively) as compared to the rabbits of T1 (control group). This increase of liver enzyme in the rabbits of T1 might indicate that rabbits were not capable to defeat the heat stress conditions and hence led to adverse effect on liver function (Faisal et al., 2008). Meanwhile, using early heat shock programs and release HSP70 might cause the reductions in the severity of histopathological degeneration in the liver which may occur resulting from exposure of rabbits to severe heat stress (Okolie and Ivoanya, 2003).
However, rabbits of T2 and T4 showed increase (P< 0.05) in Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) (70.0 and 73.3%, respectively) when compared to the rabbits of control group (Figure 2). The significant (P< 0.05) increase of TAC and globulin concentrations used as an indicator of immune responses and source of antibodies production (El-Kaiaty and Hassan, 2004; Morsy, 2018). These results agree with findings of Mashaly et al. (2004) and Nagwa et al. (2012). The differences were not significant (P> 0.05) among groups in albumin, glucose and aspartic transaminase concentrations (Table 4). Although, aspartic transaminase concentration insignificantly (P> 0.05) decreased in the heat shock exposure treatments compared with control group.
Table 4. Effect of heat shock programs on biochemical parameters of Hi-Plus rabbits in South Sinai, Egypt
Items T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 ±SE
TP (g/dl) 6.2b 6.1b 6.7ab 6.7ab 7.1a 6.3b 0.18
Albumin (g/dl) 4.1 3.9 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.05 0.11
Globulin (g/dl) 2.1b 2.2b 2.5ab 2.5ab 3.0a 2.2b 0.20
Glucose (mg/dl) 169.1 161.3 168.9 161.7 169.4 162.6 9.0
Chol (mg/dl) 62.5ab 61.7ab 58.3ab 67.3a 64.4ab 53.2b 5.5
ALT (i.u./l) 9.6a 8.5b 8.4b 8.2b 8.0b 7.9b 0.27
AST (i.u./l) 20.6 19.6 20.1 20.0 20.8 18.3 0.85
T1 = control, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 = of age and at 3 days + 25 days + 2 rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 3 days, at 25 days of age, at 2 months of age, at 3 days + 25 days months of age, respectively, ±SE = standard error. TP = total protein, Chol = cholesterol, ALT =alanine
transaminase, AST=aspartate transaminase, Means bearing different superscripts within the same row are significantly different (P< 0.05).
Figure 2. Effect of heat shock programs on total antioxidant capacity in Hi-Plus rabbits under conditions of South Sinai,
Egypt. T1 = control, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 = rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 3 days, at 25 days of age, at 2 months of age, at 3 days + 25 days of age and at 3 days + 25 days + 2 months of age, respectively, TAC = total antioxidant capacity, b different superscripts among groups means significant (P< 0.05).
94
Hormonal profile
Tri-iodothyronine (T3) hormone increased (P<0.05) in the rabbits of T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 (7.8, 9.4, 7.5, 6.8 and 7.5 % respectively) as compared to the rabbits of T1 group (Figure 3). T3 hormone plays an important role in regulating metabolism and thermogenesis (Tao et al., 2006). Concentration of T3 hormone is highly correlated to decrease of feed intake and heat stress conditions (Yahav et al. 1995). Hence, exposure of rabbits to heat stress conditions caused decrease of T3 level and decreased heat production and sustain homoeothermic (Uni et al., 2001; Attia et al., 2016). These results were in agreement with finding of Moraes et al. (2003); Nagwa et al. (2012) and Morsy (2018). However, the increase in T3 hormone of the rabbits exposed to heat shock programs may be explained the release of HSP70 which might play a role for maintaining metabolic rate and/or reducing the harmful effects of stress (Yahav and Hurwitz, 1996; Zhou et al., 1996; Yahav and Plavnik, 1999; Yahav and Mc-Murtry, 2001). However, Corticosterone (Cor) hormone decreased (P< 0.05) in the rabbits of T3, T4 T5 and T6 (62.1, 55.3, 52.8 and 60.7%, respectively) when compared to the rabbits of control group (Figure 4). In opposite, corticosteroid secretion increases as a response to heat stress (Morsy, 2018). The Cor hormone considered a more effective biological indicator of sever heat stress response (Siegel, 1995). However, lower Cor hormone level in the group of heat shock exposure programs submitted that the rabbits success to habituate to the heat stress. These results agree with the results of Star et al. (2009); Nagwa et al. (2012) and Morsy (2013). On the other hand, there was no significant (P> 0.05) difference among groups on progesterone hormone, although it insignificantly (P> 0.05) increased by 12.8 and 19.7% in T3 and T6 groups respectively as compared to the rabbits in T1 group (Figure 5).
Figure 3. Effect of heat shock programs on tri-iodothyronine hormone in Hi-Plus rabbits under conditions of South Sinai, Egypt. T1 = control, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 = rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 3 days, at 25 days of age, at 2 months of age, at 3 days + 25 days of age and at 3 days + 25 days + 2 months of age, respectively, T3 = tri-iodothyronine hormone, b different superscripts among groups means significant (P< 0.05).
Figure 4. Effect of heat shock programs on corticosterone hormone level in Hi-Plus rabbits under conditions of South Sinai, Egypt. T1 = control, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 = rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 3 days, at 25 days of age, at 2 months of age, at 3 days + 25 days of age and at 3 days + 25 days + 2 months of age, respectively, Cor = corticosterone hormone, b different superscripts among groups means significant (P< 0.05).
95
Figure 5. Effect of heat shock programs on progesterone hormone level in Hi-Plus rabbits under conditions of South Sinai, Egypt. T1 = control, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 = rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 3 days, at 25 days of age, at 2 months of age, at 3 days + 25 days of age and at 3 days + 25 days + 2 months of age, respectively, P4 = progesterone hormone.
Body weight
Final body weight and body weight changes were significantly (P< 0.05) increased in the does of T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 groups as compared to the does of control group (Table 5). This increase in final body weight and body weight changes in the does exposed to heat shock exposure during growth period (T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6) might attributed to enhance thermo-tolerance of doe rabbits that would face severe heat stress in advanced or later ages and may be reversed on increased body weight during exposure to heat stress conditions (Faisal et al., 2008; El-Badry et al., 2009; Star et al., 2009; Zulkifli et al., 2009; El-Moniary et al., 2010; Nagwa et al., 2012; Morsy, 2013 and Morsy, 2018).
Table 5. Effect of heat shock programs on doe body weight and body weight changes of Hi-Plus rabbits in South Sinai, Egypt.
Items T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 ±SE
IBW (g) 3104.0 3115.3 3179.3 3194.5 3156.4 3168.1 66.2
FBW (g) 3308.0b 3622.1a 3678.1a 3716.2a 3583.5a 3649.3a 107.3
BWC (g) 204.0b 506.7a 498.7a 521.6a 427.1a 481.2a 67.1
T1 = control, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 = rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 3 days, at 25 days of age, at 2 months of age, at 3 days + 25 days of age and at 3 days + 25 days + 2 months of age, respectively, IBW = initial body weight, FBW = final body weight, BWC = body weight change. ±SE = standard error. b Means bearing different superscripts within the same row are significantly different (P< 0.05).
Reproductive performance
Conception rate was higher (P<0.05) in the does of T5 than that of T3, T4 and T6 groups (Table 6). Furthermore, does in T5 and T1 had insignificant more parities compared to the other treatments. However, number of services/conception was lower (P<0.05) in the does of T5 as compared to the does of T3, T4 and T6 groups. Gestation length significantly (P<0.05) increased in the does of T3 by 2.8% when compared to the does of T1 and insignificantly (P> 0.05) increased in the does of T2, T4, T5 and T6 group by 1.9, 0.63, 1.9 and 1.6%, respectively as compared to the does of T1 (Table 6). These results might attribute to that rabbits exposed to heat shock programs during growth period led to increase gestation period through heat stress conditions. However, release HSP70 which may be suggested to regulate female fertility, enhancing ovulation-inducing and maintaining integrity of the fetal membranes and reducing the frequency of birth defects (Abd El-Kafy, 2006). On the other hand, milk yield significantly (P<0.05) increased in the does of T4 and T6 by 26.4 and 34.5%, respectively as compared to the does of T5 (Figure 6). This increase related to the increasing litter size in both of T4 and T6. These results showed that there is irreversible relationship between milk yield and conception rate. The lower hormonal levels in the suckling rabbits (estrogen hormone) and higher prolactin may reveal poorer ovarian activity, which could result in reducing reproductive efficiency. Our observations confirm the existence of a partial antagonism between lactation and reproduction in rabbits (Marongiu and Dimauro, 2013).
Table 6. Effect of heat shock programs on reproductive performance of Hi-Plus rabbits in South Sinai, Egypt Items T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 ±SE
Number of parity 2.1 15 17 16 2.0 16 019
CR (%) 51.1ab 52.3ab 45.5b 42.2b 62.3a 45.5b 5.4
NSC 1.9ab 2.1ab 2.4a 2.4a 1.9b 2.3a 0.19
GL (day) 31.4b 32.0ab 32.3a 31.6ab 32.0ab 31.9ab 0.21
T1 = control, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 = rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 3 days, at 25 days of age, at 2 months of age, at 3 days + 25 days of age and at 3 days + 25 days + 2 months of age, respectively, ±SE = standard error. GL= gestation length, CR= conception rate, NSC= number of services per conception, b Means bearing different superscripts within the same row are significantly different (P< 0.05)
96
Figure 6. Effect of heat shock programs on milk yield in Hi-Plus doe rabbits under conditions of South Sinai, Egypt. T1 =
control, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 = rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 3 days, at 25 days of age, at 2 months of age, at 3 days + 25 days of age and at 3 days + 25 days + 2 months of age, respectively, MY = milk yield, ^ b different superscripts among groups means significant (P< 0.05).
Litter traits
Viable Litter Size at Birth (VLSB) significantly increased in the does of T6 by about 47.0 and 48.0% as compared to those in T5 and T1, respectively (Table 7). However, there were insignificantly (P>0.05) increased VLSB in the does of T2, T3 and T4 about 32, 25 and 24%, respectively as compared to the does in T1 group. In addition, Litter Size at Weaning (LSW) increased (P< 0.05) in the does of T6, T4, T3 and T2 about 64, 70, 57 and 60%, respectively as compared to the rabbits of T1 group. However, there was insignificantly (P>0.05) increased of LSW in the does of T5 about 25.0% as compared to the does in T1 group. Litter Weight at Birth (LWB) increased (P<0.05) in the does of T2, T4 and T6 groups (43.0, 28.0 and 49.0%, respectively) as compared to the rabbits of control group (T1). Meanwhile, Litter Weight at Weaning (LWW) increased (P<0.05) in the does of T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 groups as compared to the rabbits in control group (T1). These results indicated that heat shock exposure programs did not have negative effect on litter size and weight at birth which attribute the higher litter size at birth to a role of IGF-1 in protection embryos of mammalian exposed to stress; where the effects of heat shock on total cell number and development to the blastocyst stage (Jousan and Hansern, 2004 and Abd-El Kafy, 2006). In addition, LWW increased (P<0.05) in the does of heat shock programs groups as compared to the does of control group. Exposure of doe rabbits to heat shock exposure at early age led to increase thermo-tolerance and acclimate rabbits at severe heat stress which led to decrease heat-related mortality, improve productive performance and enhance immunity responses. These results agree with the results of Abd El-Kafy (2006); Nagwa et al. (2012) and Morsy (2018).
Table 7. Effect of heat shock programs on litter traits and mortality rate of Hi-Plus rabbits under South Sinai, Egypt conditions
Items T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 ±SE
TLSB 6.4 8.2 7.2 7.8 6.2 8.7 0.80
VLSB 5.6b 7.5ab 7.1ab 7.0ab 5.7b 8.3a 0.76
LSW 3.6b 5.8a 5.7a 6.2a 4.5ab 6.0a 0.62
LWB (g) 268.3b 384.3a 312.7ab 342.2a 306.4ab 400.8a 29.9
LWW (g) 1595.3c 2940.0a 2831.1ab 2795.5ab 2248.5b 2709.7ab 201.7
MRB-W (N) 2.0 1.6 1.3 0.75 1.1 2.3 0.57
MRB-W (%) 35.7a 18.3b 13.3b 9.6b 17.6b 28.1ab 6.7
Stillbirth (n) 0.78 0.75 0.13 0.88 0.57 0.38 0.35
Stillbirth (%) 11.8 7.6 2.5 9.5 5.1 4.3 4.2
Overall MRB-W (%) 47.6a 26.0b 15.8b 19.1b 22.8b 32.5ab 8.8
T1 = control, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6= rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 3 days, at 25 days of age, at 2 months of age, at 3 days+25 days of age and at 3 days+25 days+2 months of age, respectively, ±SE = standard error, TLSB = total litter size at birth, VLSB =viable litter size at birth, LSW = litter size at weaning, LWB= litter weight at birth, LWW= litter weight at weaning, MRB-W = mortality rate from birth to weaning, ^ c Means bearing different superscripts within the same row are significantly different (P< 0.05)
Mortality rate
Results of table 7 declared that Mortality Rate from Birth to Weaning (MRB-W) and overall MRB-W were lower (P<0.05) in does of T2, T3, T4 and T5 groups than control group (T1). These results suggested that release HSP70 synthesis (Figure 1) may protect doe immune function against some forms of stress as reported by Ciavarra and Simone (1990 a and b) and Abd El-Kafy (2006). On the other hand, Yahav et al. (1997 a and b) and Nagwa et al. (2012) reported that early heat shock exposures led to decrease mortality rate and this may be due to enhance thermo- tolerance and immunity. However, Figure 7 demonstrated that heat shock programs led to decrease (P<0.05) mortality in doe Hi-Plus rabbits and this might be due to enhance thermos-tolerance mechanism. Indeed, increasing mortality rate in control group
97
(T1) may be attributed to inability to regulate body temperature and respiration rate under heat stress conditions as shown in table 2. These results agree with the results of Yahav et al. (1997a); Nagwa et al. (2005) and Abd El-Kafy (2006).
15.0b ■
_n_T1_T3_T4_T5_T6_
Figure 7. Effect of heat shock programs on doe mortality rate in Hi-Plus rabbits under conditions of South Sinai, Egypt.
T1 = control, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 = rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 3 days, at 25 days of age, at 2 months of age, at 3 days + 25 days of age and at 3 days + 25 days + 2 months of age, respectively, MR = mortality rate, b different superscripts among groups means significant (P< 0.05).
Offspring's traits
Results in table 8 revealed that early heat shock offspring growth performance, though, does of T2, T3 as compared to does of T1.
Economic indicators
Productive efficiency index and feed conversion were improved (P< 0.05) in the does of T2 (28.8 and 26.1%), T3 (44.3 and 34.3%), T4 (41.5 and 29.5%), T5 (28.8 and 25.6%) and T6 (33.2 and 29.0%), respectively when compared to the does of T1 group (Table 9). However, no significant (P>0.05) differences between treatments in feed intake. Indeed, cost of feeding for producing one kg live weight under desert hot conditions decreased (P<0.05) in the does of T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 it was 9.2, 12.1, 10.4, 8.9 and 10.2 L.E., respectively as compared to the does of T1 group (Figure 8). This improvement in productive traits might be attributed to application of heat exposure programs (Franco-Jimenez et al., 2007; Emam, 2013 and Morsy, 2018). Heat shock exposure programs at early ages might enhance thermo-tolerance of doe rabbits for facing severe heat stress in later ages (Faisal et al., 2008; El-Badry et al., 2009; Zulkifli et al., 2009; El-Moniary et al., 2010; Nagwa et al., 2012 and Morsy, 2013). So, increase of HSP70 expression might suggesting that the proteins involved in the stress caused by heat shock exposure in the does that play important role in protecting stressed cells and reversing disorders caused by stress (Li and Werb, 1982; Emam, 2013) and hence it reflected on improvement of productive performance of doe rabbits (Abd El-Kafy, 2006).
Table 8. Effect of heat shock programs on offspring's of Hi-Plus rabbits in South Sinai, Egypt
Items T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 ±SE
BWB (g) 48.5 52.7 46.9 49.7 56.9 48.5 3.3
BWW (g) 484.1 521.2 545.7 460.1 531.7 490.7 51.4
BDGB-W (g) 15.5 16.7 17.8 14.6 16.9 15.7 1.8
GR (%) 159.8 161.1 166.9 160.4 159.8 162.7 3.4
T1 = control, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 = rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 3 days, at 25 days of age, at 2 months of age, at 3 days + 25 days of age and at 3 days + 25 days + 2 months of age, respectively, ±SE = standard error, BWB = bunny weight at birth, BWW = bunny weight at weaning, BDGB-W = bunny daily gain from birth to weaning, GR = growth rate.
Table 9. Effect of heat shock programs on economic indicators of Hi-Plus rabbits in South Sinai, Egypt
Items T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 ±SE
Daily FI (g) 145.3 148.6 148.7 148.0 148.4 146.5 1.4
TFI(kg) 17.8 18.2 18.3 18.2 18.2 18.0 0.17
EI (kg live weight) 3.2b 4.1a 4.6a 4.5a 4.1a 4.3a 0.43
FC 6.4a 4.7b 4.2b 4.5b 4.7b 4.5b 0.64
T1 = control, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 = rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 3 days, at 25 days of age, at 2 months of age, at 3 days + 25 days of age and at 3 days + 25 days + 2 months of age, respectively, ±SE = standard error, DFI = daily feed intake, TFI = total feed intake, EI = efficiency index, FC = feed conversion, b Means bearing different superscripts within the same row are significantly different (P< 0.05)
exposure programs of does had no significant (P>0.05) effect on and T5 had higher bunny weight at weaning and bunny daily gain
98
Figure 8. Effect of heat shock programs on cost of feeding for producing one kilogram of live weight in Hi-Plus rabbits under conditions of South Sinai, Egypt. T1 = control, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 = rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 3 days, at 25 days of age, at 2 months of age, at 3 days + 25 days of age and at 3 days + 25 days + 2 months of age, respectively, CFP = cost of feeding for producing one kg live weight, b different superscripts among groups means significant (P< 0.05).
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, applying heat shock exposure programs for doe rabbits especially T3 treatment (rabbits were exposed to heat shock exposure at 25 days of age) might increase HSP70 gene expression and enhance acclimation of doe rabbits, this led to enhance immunity responses, reproductive performance and production under severe heat stress conditions.
DECLARATIONS
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to Dr. Ahmed Othman for his support and assisting in lab work. Deepest thanks are due to Dr. Mohsen Shaker Abd El-Fattah for facilitating the research work. Heartfelt thanks are due to Ras Sudr Station Staff for contributed during sample collection.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publications of this article.
Consent to publish
All the authors approved and agreed to publish the manuscript and declared that this work has not been previously published elsewhere.
Author's contribution
Dr. Nagwa Abde El-Hady Ahmed designed the experiment, article writing and revision, Dr .Ali Saber Morsy designed the experiment, laboratory analyses, statistical analysis, tabulation of experimental data, manuscript writing, commenting and approval, Dr. Osama Glal Sakr helped in statistical analysis, tabulation of experimental data and article writing; Dr .Khamis Refay Sayed Emam designed the experiment, tabulation of experimental data, manuscript writing, commenting and approval; while, Mr .Baliegh Hamdy Mohammed Mousa helped in field study, collected data, laboratory analyses, manuscript writing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
REFERENCES
Abd El-Kafy EM (2006). Effect of heat exposure and feed restriction as bio-stimulation method for enhancing rabbit productivity. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt, p. 95.
Abd El-Kafy EM, Ali WA, Hoda AS and Azoz AA (2008). Effect of short heat exposure, balanced feed restriction and acetic acid supplement at post weaning on growth and thermoregulation in growing rabbits during hot season. 9th World Rabbit Congress, June 10,13, Verona, Italy.
Abd El-Samee AM, Ali AM, Mousa MR and Abd El-Ghaffar MA (2005). Productivity and reproductive of heat stressed rabbits as influenced by nutritional treatments under Sinai conditions. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Rabbit Production in Hot Climate, (RPHC'05), Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, pp: 265-371.
Attia YA, Abd El-Hamid AE, Abedalla AA, Berika MA, Al-Harthi MA, Kucuk O, Sahin K and Abou-Shehema BM (2016). Laying performance, digestibility and plasma hormones in laying hens exposed to chronic heat stress as affected by betaine, vitamin C, and/or vitamin E supplementation. Springer Plus, 5: 1619: 2-12. D0I:10.1186/s40064-016-3304-0
Chirico WJ, Waters MG and Blobel G (1988). 70K Heat shock related protein stimulate protein translocation into microsomes. Nature, 332: 805-810. DOI: 10.1038/332805a0
99
Ciavarra RP and Simeone A (1990a). T Lymphocyte stress response. i- induction of heat shock protein synthesis at febrile temperature is correlated with enhanced resistance to hyperthermic stress but not to heavy metal toxicity or dexamethasone-induced immunosuppression. Cell Immunol, 129(2): 363-376. DOI: 10.1016/0008-8749(90)90212-A
Ciavarra RP and Simeone A (1990b). T lymphocyte stress response. ii. protection of translation and DNA replication against some forms of stress by prior hypothermic stress. Cell Immunol, 131(1):11-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8749(90)90231-F
De Basilio V, Requena F, Leon A, Vilarin OM and Picard M (2003). Early age thermal conditioning immediately reduces body temperature of broiler chicks in a tropical environment. Poultry Science, 82:1235-1241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.8.1235
Duncan DB (1955). Multiple range and multiple F-test. Biometrics, 11: 1 -42.
El-Badry AS, Hassanane MM, Ahmed ES and El-Kholy KH (2009). Effect of early-age acclimation on some physiological, immunological responses and chromosomal aberrations in Muscovy ducks during exposure to heat stress. Global Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 4(2):152-159.
DOI: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237614195
El-Kaiaty AM and Hassan MS (2004). Some physiological and immunological parameters in the female of local chicken strains. Egyptian Poultry Science, 24: 901- 916.
El-Moniary MM, Hemid AA, El-Wardany I, Gehad AE and Gouda A (2010). The effect of early age heat conditioning and some feeding programs for heat-stressed broiler chicks on: 1 - productive performance. World Journal of Agriculture Science, 6(6): 689-695.
DOI: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/18e8/70a844cc0d42a067265ad9fb31830cd13696.pdf
Emam, KR (2013). Using bio-stimulation to alleviate heat stress of chickens under desert conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza Egypt, p. 85.
Faisal BA, Abdel-Fattah SA, El-Hommosany YM and Maie FM (2008). Immunocompetence, hepatic heat shock protein 70 and physiological responses to feed restriction and heat stress in two body weight lines of Japanese quail. International Journal Poultry Science, 7 (2): 174-183. DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2008.174.183
Franco-Jimenez DJ, Scheideler SE, Kittok RJ, Brown-Brandl TM, Robeson LR, Taira H and Beck MM (2007). Differential effects of heat stress in three strains of laying hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 16(4): 628-634. DOI: 10.3382/japr.2005-00088
Hahn GM and Li GC (1990). Thermotolerance, thermo resistance, and thermo sensitization. in: stress proteins in biology and medicine. (Eds. Morimoto, R.I.; Tissieres, A. and Geogopoulos, C.) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp. 79-100.
Hanan SM (2006). Some physiological and immunological measurements in local breed of chickens after heat stress. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Egypt, 189 p.
Jousan FD and Hansen PJ (2004). Insulin-like Growth Factor-I as a Survival Factor for the Bovine Preimplantation Embryo Exposed to Heat Shock. Biology of Reproduction, 71(5): 1665-1670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.104.032102
Lebas FP, Coudert H and Thebault RG (1997). The rabbit husbandry, health and production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO, Rome, Italy.
Li GC and Werb Z (1982). Correlation between synthesis of heat-shock proteins and development of thermotolerance in Chinese hamster fibroblasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 79: 3218-3222. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.79.10.3218
Maak S, Melesse A, Schmidt R, Schneider F and Von Lengerken G (2003). Effect of long-term heat exposure on peripheral concentrations of heat shock protein 70 (hsp70) and hormones in laying hens with different genotypes. British Poultry Science, 44:133-138. DOI: 10.1080/0007166031000085319
Marai IF, Habeeb AA, El-Sayed GA and Nessem MZ (1994). Growth performance and physiological response of New Zealand White and Californian rabbit under hot summer conditions of Egypt. 1st International Conference Rabbit Prod. In Hot Climates, 6-8 September, 1994, Cairo, Egypt, pp. 619-625. DOI: 10.1023/A:1012772311177
Marai, IF, Ayyat MS, Gabr HA and Abdel-Monem UM (1996). Effect of summer heat stress and its amelioration on production Performance of New Zealand White Adult Female and Male Under Egyptian Conditions. 6th World Rabbit Congress, 2, 197208.
Marai IF, Ayyat MS and Abdel-Monem UM (2001). Growth performance and reproductive traits at first parity of New Zealand White female rabbits as affected by heat stress and its alleviation under Egyptian conditions. Journal Tropical Animal Health Production, 33:1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012772311177
Marongiu ML and Dimauro C (2013). Preliminary study on factors influencing rabbit doe reproductive efficiency: effect of parity, day of mating, and suckling on ovarian status and estrogen levels at day 6 of pregnancy. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, Volume 77, Number 2, April 2013, pp. 126-130. DOI: http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201500107171
Mashaly MM, Hendricks GL, Kalama MA, Gehad AE, Abbas AO and Patterson PH (2004). Effect of heat stress on production parameters and immune responses of commercial laying hens. Poultry Science, 83:889-894. DOI: 10.1093/ps/83.6.889
Moraes VM, Malheiros RD, Bruggeman V, Collin A, Tona K, Van Onagbesan OM, Buyse J, Decuypere E, Macari M and Van AS (2003). Effect of thermal conditioning during embryonic development on aspects of physiological responses of broilers to heat stress. Journal of Thermal Biology, 28(2): 133-140. DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4565(02)00049-9
Morimoto R I, Tissieres A and Georo Poulos C (1990). Stress protein in biology and medicine. Cold spring Harper, New York. DOI:10.1126/science.572-a
Morsy AS (2001). Reproductive and productive performance of rabbits under different housing systems. Master Science, Thesis, Faculty of agricultural, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
100
Morsy AS (2007). Enhancing rabbit performance reared in newly reclaimed areas by alleviating the environmental stress. PhD Thesis Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University.
Morsy AS (2013). Effect of heat shock exposure on the physiological responses and semen quality of male chickens under heat stress conditions. Egyptian Poultry Science, 33, (1): 143-161.
Morsy AS (2018). Hematological parameters and productive performance of heat-stressed laying hens as influenced by early heat shock program, sodium bicarbonate and/or vitamin C supplementation. research Journal Animal and Veterinary Science, 10(2): 1-8.
Morsy AS, Amal MH and Shaker YM (2011). Monitoring of physiological responses of Gabali rabbits under semi-arid conditions of Egypt. The 4th Egyptian Conference on Rabbit Science, Faculty of agricultural, Cairo University, 29 October, 2011, 34-50.
Nagwa AA, Amal, MH, Mehaisen GM and Emam KR (2012). Effect of using heat shock programs on thermoregulation responses and performance of laying hens under desert conditions. Egyptian Poultry Science, 32 (4): 777-790.
Nagwa AA, Amina F, Shafie MM and Azoz AA (1994). Effect of post-partum mating interval of rabbits on progesterone level through pregnancy. Egyptian Journal Animal Production, 31 (supplement): 463 - 473.
Nagwa, AA, El-Tantawy SM, Khadr, Amina F and El-Badry AS (2004). Effect of early heat exposure and feeding system on physiological responses and productive performance of ducting under heat stress conditions. Egyptian Journal Animal Production, 41 (Supplement): 485-499.
Nagwa AA, Ismail AM and Abdel-Kafy EM (2005). Effect of heat exposure and feed restriction on performance of pregnant rabbit-does with emphasis on heat shock protein detection. The 2nd Inter. Conference Veterinary Research Division NRC Cairo, Egypt, 27-37.
National Research Council (1994). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th edition. National Academic Press. Washington, DC. Availabe at: Chttps://www.scirp.org/(S(oyulxb452alnt1aej1nfow45)) /reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx? ReferenceID=1955728.
Okolie NP and Ivoanya CU (2003). Some histologic and biochemical evidence for mitigation of cyanide-induced tissue lesions by antioxidant vitamin administration in rabbits. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 41 (4): 463-469.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6915(02)00224-7
Rahimi G (2005). Effect of heat shock at early phase on glucose and calcium regulation axis in broiler chickens. International Journal Poultry Science, 4(10): 790-794. DOI: .3923/ijps.2005.790.794"10.3923/ijps.2005.790.794
Sakr OG (2003). Effect of ambient temperature on the behavior and the reproductive performance of rabbits. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
SAS Institute (2004). SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Release 9.1. SAS Institute Incorporated., Cary, North Carolina.
Siegel HS (1995). Stress, strains and resistance. British Poultry Science, 36: 3-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669508417748
Star L, Juul-Madsen HR, Decuypere E, Nieuwland MB, de Vries Reilingh G, van den Brand H, Kemp B and Parmentier H K (2009). Effect of early life thermal conditioning and immune challenge on thermotolerance and humoral immune competence in adult laying hens. Poultry Science, 88: 2253-2261.doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00373
Tao X, Zhang ZY, Dong H, Zhang H and Xin H (2006). Responses of thyroid hormones of market-size broilers to thermoneutral constant and warm cyclic temperatures. Poultry Science, 85: 1520-1528. DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.9.1520
Uni Z, Gal-Garger O, Geyra A, Sklan D and Yahav S (2001). Changes in growth and function of chick small intestine epithelium duo to early thermal conditioning. Poultry Science, 80: 438-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80A438
Yahav S and Hurwitz S (1996). Induction of thermotolerance in male broiler chickens by temperature conditioning at an early age. Poultry Science, 75:402-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750402
Yahav S and McMurtry JP (2001). Thermotolerance acquisition in broiler chickens by temperature conditioning early in life-the effect of timing and ambient temperature. Poultry Science, 80: 1662-1666. DOI: 10.1093/ps/80.12.1662
Yahav S and Plavnik I (1999). Effect of early-age thermal conditioning and food restriction on performance and thermotolerance of male broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 40:120- 126. DOI: 10.1080/00071669987944
Yahav S, Goldfeld S, Plavnik I and Hurwitz S (1995). Physiological response of chickens and turkey to relative humidity during exposure to high ambient temperature. Journal biology thermodynamics, 20: 245-253. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4565(94)00046-L
Yahav S, Shamai A, Haberfeld A, Horev G, Hurwitz S and Einat M (1997a). Induction of thermo-tolerance in chickens by temperature conditioning: heat shock protein expression. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 15: 628-636. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632. 1997.tb51757.x
Yahav S, Shamay A, Horev G, Barilan D, Genina O and Friedman-Einat M (1997b). effect of acquisition of improved thermotolerance on the induction of heat shock proteins in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 76:1428- 1434.
DOI: 10.1093/ps/76.10.1428
Yalcin S, Zkan OS, Turkmut L and Siegel PB (2001). Response to heat stress in commercial and local broiler stocks. 1. Performance traits. British Poultry Science, 42:149-152. DOI: 10.1080/00071660120048375
Zhou WT, Fujita M, Ito T and Yamamoto S (1996). Effects of intermittent short-term acclimation to 32oc on some thermoregulatory responses and standing behavior of laying hens exposed acutely to 36 oc. Japanese Poultry Science, 33: 221- 229.
Zulkifli I, Al-Aqil A, Omar AR, Sazili AQ and Rajion MA (2009). Crating and heat stress influence blood parameters and heat shock protein 70 expression in broiler chickens showing short or long tonic immobility reactions. Poultry Science, 88: 471 -476. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2008-00287
101
