CC BY
42
ГЕНЕТИКА, БИОТЕХНОЛОГИЯ, СЕЛЕКЦИЯ И СЕМЕНОВОДСТВО
Известия ТСХА, выпуск 2, 2015 год
УДК 631.523.13:631.526.2
DIFFERENCES IN PLOIDY LEVEL AND GENOME CONSTITUTION REVEALED BY CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PSEUDOROEGNERIA GERMPLASM ACCESSIONS: CASE STUDY
THI MAI L. KHUAT1, M.G. DIVASHUK1, P. YU. KROUPIN1, PHUONG A. NGUYEN1, A.V. KISELEVA2, G.I. KARLOV1
(1 Russian Timiryazev State Agrarian University; 2 National Research Center for Preventive Medicine)
Pseudoroegneria is a genus in Triticeae (Poaceae) consisting of diploid, auto- and allopolyploid species that are built around St genome. Total genomic DNA of St genome is used in molecular assays for fundamental and applied studies. It is important to verify whether an accession belongs to the species shown in the catalogue or label. The study ofplant material from Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN) have shown that the P. spicata accession PI 635993 is a diploid(2n=14), the P. spicata accession PI537371 is a tetraploid (2n=28), the P. strigosa accessions PI 639805 and PI 595164 are hexaploids (2n=42). Genomic in situ hybridization revealed that each of the polyploids PI 537371 and PI 639805 possesses one St genome and one or two unidentified genomes, respectively.
Key words: Pseudoroegneria, ploidy level, chromosome number, germplasm, genomic in situ hybridization.
Pseudoroegneria is a genus in Triticeae (Poaceae) consisting of nearly 15 species (for review see the information source [20]). Genus is built around one genome designated St and consists of diploid (2n=14) and tetraploid (2n=28) species. Among others diploid species are represented by P. strigosa (M. Bieb.) A. Love (St) and P. spicata (Pursh) A. Love. Polyploids are autotetraploids (StSt) or near-autotetraploids (St1St2). St genome is one of the basic genomes in perennial Triticeae and is believed to be a candidate donor genome of the species in Douglasdeweya (StP), Roegneria (StY), Elytrigia (ESt), Thinopyrum (JJsSt), Elymus (StH, StYH and StYW), Kengyilia (StYP), and Pascopyrum (StHNsXm) [20].
Species carrying St subgenome is an important gene pool for genetic improvement of cereal crops. In particular, Thinopyrum intermedium, Th. ponticum and Elymus species are used for wheat and barley breeding for developing resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses via intergeneric hybridization [5, 9, 20]. At the same time, a great majority of the St-bearing wild grasses possessing valuable traits such as resistance to pests, fungal and viral diseases, tolerance to salinity and drought are still to be assessed and used in breeding process.
The phylogenetic relationship and taxonomic position of Pseudoroegneria and its relative species are still in dispute [22, 24]. The study of the phylogenetic relationship between wild Triticeae grasses is of greatest importance. Firstly, it provides the informa-
tion on genetic differentiation, polyploidization and evolution trajectories of Triticeae species [10, 11, 24]. Secondly, the knowledge of genomic constitution and homeology degree between the chromosomes of wild grass and cultivated species may help to estimate the success of transfer of valuable traits that occurs via chromosome pairing at mei-osis [5, 15]. Finally, the proper identification of alien chromosome introgression facilitates the application of the genetic stocks in breeding and the development of commercial cultivars [17].
The complex of approaches is used for distinguishing Pseudoroegneria-related species and the establishment of their evolutional relationships. The morphological features of grasses (leaves, glumes, spikelets, rachis and others) in certain cases can hardly be applied as reliable introgeneric distinctions in the closely related species where such features differ very insignificantly [24]. The genomic constitution suggested by Love [12] and Dewey [3] as the main taxonomical criteria consequently has been widely accepted. The widely used technology for determining the genomic constitution is genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) using labeled total DNA of St-genome [2, 7, 15]. GISH procedure is applied to analyze the contribution of Pseudoroegneria genome into genomic constitution of investigated polyploids. Molecular approaches involve the comparison of polymorphism in internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of nuclear ribosomal DNA [11, 13, 14, 22]; granule-bound starch synthase gene [15], plastid-specific genes [11, 23, 24], the repetitive sequences [10, 16, 19] and others.
In evolutionary and/or breeding studies the Pseudoroegneria germplasm is used as a source of St-genome DNA for GISH or as a source of St-derived nuclear and plastid genes. The basic prerequisite successful study is the use of properly identified plant material of Pseudoroegneria and its genomic constitution. The botanical identification of Pseu-doroegneria species is difficult and germplasm bank accessions needs to be analyzed by application of different approaches.
The aim of this work was to determine the chromosome number and to identify St genome in two accessions of P. strigosa and two accessions P. spicata obtained from the Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN).
Materials and methods
Two accessions of P. strigosa (PI 595164, PI 639805) and two accessions P. spicata (PI 635993, PI 537371) were used in this study. Seeds of the accessions were kindly provided by the Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). The accessions numbers and geographical origin of the accessions are listed in the Table 1.
T a b l e 1
List of Pseudoroegneria species
Species Accession No Origin
P. strigosa ssp. aegilopoides PI 595164 Xinjiang, China
P. strigosa PI 639805 Mongolia
P. spicata PI 635993 Washington, United States
P. spicata PI 537371 Idaho, United States
30
Protocols for chromosome preparation, in situ hybridization and signal detection were described previously [6, 8].
Results and Discussion
The chromosome number was established for four presumably diploid Pseudoroegn-eria accessions ordered via GRIN: two accessions of P. spicata (Pi 635993, PI 537371) and two accessions of P. strigosa (PI 595164, PI 639805. Only the P. spicata accession PI 635993 was a diploid one having 14 chromosomes (Fig.la). The P. spicata accession PI 537371 had 28 chromosomes (tetraploid; Fig. 2a). The P. strigosa accessions PI 595164 and PI 639805 had 42 chromosomes (hexaploids; Fig. 1b and 2b).
Fig. 1. Mitosis metaphase chromosomes of P. spicata accession PI 635993 (a) and P. strigosa accession PI 595164 (b)
Thus, our analysis showed that only one out of four Pseudoroegneria accessions was diploid. Particular attention should be paid to the P strigosa accession PI 595164, as it is listed as a diploid species in the table of the used materials [23]. In our study it was shown that it possesses 42 chromosomes. Such discrepancy may be due to the fact that our PI 595164 was a spontaneous auto- or allopolyploid, to heterogeneity of the accession or technical issues.
Pseudoroegneria species is represented by diploids (St) and auto- (StSt) and/or near autotetraploids (St1St2) [20]. If a genomic constitution of particular St carrying accession is diploid or even autopolyploid, it may be useful in different molecular and cytogenetic assays: preparing genomic DNA probes, cloning genes, molecular phylogenetic analysis, and other purposes. Difficulties may arise in the estimation of phenotypic response to biotic and abiotic stresses, as diploids and polyploids show different resistance [21]. Besides, using such accession can result in discrepancy in the data of molecular phylogenetic analyses.
Therefore, to establish auto or allopolyploid nature of the studied accessions we performed genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) on the tetraploid accession PI 537371 and hexaploid accession PI 639805 with total genomic DNA of the P spicata accession PI 635993 (14 chromosomes) as a probe to identify St genome. GISH revealed that the studied
31
Fig. 2. GISH on the root-tip cells at mitotic metaphase in P. spicata PI 537371 (a) and P. strigosa PI 639805 (b). Yellow or greenish yellow fluorescence with FITC corresponds to sites of St-probe hybridization, red fluorescence with propidium iodide counterstain corresponds to sites blocked with DNA of bread wheat. The translocated chromosomes are indicated by arrowheads
accessions are allopolyploids and not autopolyploids (Fig. 2). The accession PI 537371 is an allotetraploid (2n=28) (Fig. 2a). The St-probe hybridized with 10 chromosomes, which, therefore, belong to St genome. The St-signal was absent on 11 chromosomes, which means that they belong to another unidentified genome. Seven chromosomes possessed the St-signal on their separate regions, i.e. they resulted from the translocation/recombination between chromosomes of St and the unidentified genomes (Fig. 2a, shown with arrows). The translocations may have occurred in either somatic cells or at the formation of unreduced 2n gametes in the initial interspecific hybrid [4]. The formation of such gametes was described in interspecific hybrids of the tribe Triticeae [18].
GISH revealed that the accession PI 639805 is an allohexaploid (2n=42) (Fig. 2b): the St-probe hybridized with 28 chromosomes; 14 did not show St-signal, consequently, they belong to the unidentified genome (Fig. 2b).
In conclusion, we showed that among the four analyzed accessions only PI 635993 was found to be a diploid one. The other three accessions were polyploid, in particular, allopolyploids, as was revealed by GISH. These polyploids may be either misidentified or confused with other species [1] or were treated using previous rules of taxonomy [20] or even evolved as a spontaneous hybrid. In order to avoid false results using the accessions of wild grasses for breeding purposes or for molecular and cytogenetic studies of phyloge-netic relationship and taxonomic position of Pseudoroegneria and its relative species it is necessary to carry out preliminary cytological assays (at least chromosomes counting) to verify whether the accession belongs to the species shown in the catalogue or label. This procedure is important even when the seeds are obtained from seed banks or for accessions previously validated in other studies unless they are obtained directly by the researchers themselves.
References
1. Barkworth M.E., Carlson J.R. Elymus wawawaiensis: a species hitherto confused with Pseudoroegneria spicata (Triticeae, Poaceae) // Phytologia. 1997. 83. P. 312-330.
32
2. Chen Q., Conner R.L., Laroche A., Thomas J.B. Genome analysis of Thinopyrum intermedium and Th. ponticum using genomic in situ hybridization // Genome. 1998. № 41. P. 580-586.
3. Dewey D.R. The genomic system of classification as a guide to intergeneric hybridization with the perennial Triticeae // In: J. P. Gustafson (Ad). Gene Manipulation in Plant Improvement. 1984. P. 209-279.
4. Karlov G.I., Khrustaleva L.I., Lim K.B., Tuyl J.M.V. Homoeologous recombination in 2n-gametes producing interspecific hybrids of Lilium (Liliaceae) studied by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) // Genome. 1999. 42(4). P. 681-686.
5. Kim N.S., Fedak G., Han F., Cao W. Cytogenetic analyses of intergeneric hybrids between barley and nine species of Elymus // Genome. 2008. 51(11). P. 897-904.
6. Kirov I., Divashuk M., Soloviev A., Khrustaleva L., Van Laere K. An easy "steamdrop" method for high quality plant chromosome preparation // Mol Cytogenet. 2014. 7(1): 21. DOI http:// dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-7-21.
7. Kishii M., Wang R.R.C., Tsujimoto H. GISH analysis revealed new aspect of genomic constitution of Thinopyrum intermedium // Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed, eds. Proc. 5th Int Triticeae Symp, Prague, Czech Republic. 2005. P. 92-95.
8. Kroupin P.Y., Divashuk M.G., Aleksandrov O.S., Karlov G.I., Belov V.I., Glukhova L.I. Comparative molecular cytogenetic characterization of partial wheat-wheatgrass hybrids // Russian Journal of Genetics. 2011. Vol. 47(4). P. 432-437 .
9. Li H., WangX. Thinopyrum ponticum and Th. intermedium: the promising source of resistance to fungal and viral diseases of wheat // J Genet Genomics. 2009. 36(9). P. 557-565.
10. Li X.M., Lee B.S., Mammadov A.C., Koo B.C., Mott I.W., Wang R.R.C. CAPS markers specific to Eb, Ee, and R genomes in the tribe Triticeae // Genome. 2007. 50(4). P. 400-411.
11. Liu Q., Ge S., Tang H., Zhang X., Zhu G., Lu B.R. Phylogenetic relationships in Elymus (Poaceae: Triticeae) based on the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer and chloroplast trnL-F sequences // New Phytol. 2006. 170(2). 411-420.
12. Love A. Conspectus of the Triticeae // Feddes Repertorium. 1984. 95. P. 425-521.
13. Mahelka V., Kopecky D. Gene Capture from across the Grass Family in the Allohexaploid Elymus repens (L.) Gould (Poaceae, Triticeae) as Evidenced by ITS, GBSSI, and Molecular Cytogenetics // Mol Biol Evol. 2010. 27(6). P. 1370-1390.
14. Mahelka V., Kopecky D., Baum B.R. Contrasting patterns of evolution of 45S and 5S rDNA families uncover new aspects in the genome constitution of the agronomically important grass Thinopyrum intermedium (Triticeae) // Mol Biol Evol. 2013. 30(9). P. 2065-2086.
15. Mahelka V., Kopecky D., Pastova L. On the genome constitution and evolution of intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium: Poaceae, Triticeae) // BMC Evol Biol. 2011. 11. P. 127.
16. Okito P., MottI.W., Wu., WangR.R.C. A Y genome specific STS marker in Pseudoroegn-eria and Elymus species (Triticeae: Gramineae) // Genome. 2009. 52(4). P. 391-400.
17. Salina E.A., Adonina I.G., Badaeva E.D., Kroupin P.Yu., Stasyuk A.I., Leonova I.N., Shishkina A.A., Divashuk M.G., Starikova E.V., Khuat T.M.L., Syukov V.V., Karlov G.I. A Thinopyrum intermedium chromosome in bread wheat cultivars as a source of genes conferring resistance to fungal diseases // Euphytica January 2015 DOI 10.1007/s10681-014-1344-5.
18. Silkova O.G., Shchapova A.I., Shumny V.K. Meiotic restitution in amphihaploids in the tribe Triticeae // Russian Journal of Genetics 2011. Vol. 47(4). P. 383-393.
19. Tang Z.X., Yang Z.J., Fu S.L., YangM.Y., Li G.R., Zhang H.Q., Tan F.Q., Ren Z. A new long terminal repeat (LTR) sequence allows to identify J genome from JS and St genomes of Thinopyrum intermedium // J Appl Genetics. 2011. 52(1). P. 31-33.
20. Wang R.R.C. Agropyron and Psathyrostachys // Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources Cereals. 2011. P. 77-108.
21. Yildiz M. Plant Responses at Different Ploidy Levels // Current Progress in Biological Research. Edited by Marina Silva-Opps. Publisher: InTech. 2013. URL: http://www.intechopen.com/ books/current-progress-in-biological-research/plant-responses-at-different-ploidy-levels.
33
22. Yu H., Fan X., Zhang C., Ding C., WangX., ZhouY. Phylogenetic relationships of species in Pseudoroegneria (Poaceae: Triticeae) and related genera inferred from nuclear rDNA ITS (internal transcribed spacer) sequences // Biologia. 2008. Vol. 63(4). P. 498-505.
23. Yu H.Q., Zhang C., Ding C.B., MaX., Zhou Y.H. Maternal donors of polyploids in Pseudoroegneria (Poaceae: Triticeae) and related genera inferred from chloroplast trnL-F sequences // Turk. J. Biol. 2010. 34. P. 335-342.
24. Zhang C., Fan X., Yu H.Q., Zhang H.Q., WangX.L., Zhou Y.H. Phylogenetic analysis of questionable tetraploid species in Roegneria and Pseudoroegneria (Poaceae: Triticeae) inferred from a gene encoding plastid acety1-COA carboxylase // Journal Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 2009. Vol. 37(4). P. 412-420.
ЦИТОГЕНЕТИЧЕСКИй АНАЛИЗ УРОВНЯ ПЛОИДНОСТИ
И ГЕНОМНОЙ КОНСТИТУЦИИ У ОБРАЗЦОВ PSEUDOROEGNERIA ИЗ ГЕНЕТИЧЕСКИХ БАНКОВ СЕМЯН
Т.М.Л. КХУАТ1, М.Г. ДИВАШУК1, П.Ю. КРУПИН1, Ф.А. НГУЕН1, А.В. КИСЕЛЕВА2, Г.И. КАРЛОВ1
С1 РГАУ-МСХА имени К.А. Тимирязева;
2 Государственный научно-исследовательский центр профилактической медицины)
Псевдорогнерия (Pseudoroegneria) относится к трибе Пшеницевых семейства Злаки (Poaceae: Triticeae). В ее состав входят диплоидные, авто- и аллополиплоидные виды, несущие St геном. Тотальная геномная ДНК St генома используется в молекулярных анализах при проведении фундаментальных и прикладных исследований. При этом необходимо проверять, соответствует ли видовая идентичность используемого образца указанной в каталоге или на этикетке. Исследование растительного материала, заказанного в системе Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN), установило, что образец P. spicata PI 635993 является диплоидом (2n=14), образец P. spicata PI537371 - тетраплоидом (2n=28), образцы P. strigosa PI 639805 и PI 595164 - гексаплоидами (2n=42). Анализ с помощью геномной гибридизации in situ показал, что полиплоиды PI537371 и PI639805 в дополнение к St геному несут соответственно один и два неидентифицированных генома.
Key words: Pseudoroegneria, псевдорогнерия, число хромосом, банк семян, геномная гибридизация in situ.
Кхуат Тхи Май Лыонг - асп. Центра молекулярной биотехнологии РГАУ-МСХА имени К.А. Тимирязева (127550, г. Москва, ул. Тимирязевская, 49; тел.: (499) 977-70-01; e-mail: [email protected]).
Дивашук Михаил Георгиевич - к. б. н., ст. науч. сотр. Центра молекулярной биотехнологии РГАУ-МСХА имени К.А. Тимирязева (127550, г. Москва, ул. Тимирязевская, 49; тел.: (499) 977-70-01; e-mail: [email protected]).
Крупин Павел Юрьевич - к. б. н., ст. науч. сотр. Центра молекулярной биотехнологии РГАУ-МСХА имени К.А. Тимирязева (127550, г. Москва, ул. Тимирязевская, 49; тел.: (499) 977-70-01; e-mail: [email protected]).
Нгуен Фыонг Ань - магистрант кафедры генетики, биотехнологии, селекции и семеноводства РГАУ-МСХА имени К.А. Тимирязева (127550, г. Москва, ул. Тимирязевская, 49; тел.: (499) 977-70-01, e-mail: [email protected]).
Киселева Анна Витальевна - к. б. н., науч. сотр. лаб. молекулярной генетики Государственного научно-исследовательского центра профилактической медицины (101000, г. Москва, Петроверигский пер., 10; тел.: (499) 790-71-72; e-mail: [email protected]).
Карлов Геннадий Ильич - д. б. н., проф., руководитель Центра молекулярной биотехнологии РГАУ-МСХА имени К.А. Тимирязева (127550, г. Москва, ул. Тимирязевская, 49; тел.: (499) 977-70-01; e-mail: [email protected]).
Khuat Thi Mai Luong - PhD student of the Centre for Molecular Biotechnology, Russian Timiryazev State Agrarian University (127550, Moscow, Timiryazevskaya street, 49; tel.: +7 (499) 977-70-01; e-mail: [email protected]).
Divashuk Mikhail Georgievich - PhD in Biology, senior researcher of the Centre for Molecular Biotechnology, Russian Timiryazev State Agrarian University (127550, Moscow, Timiryazevskaya street, 49; tel.: +7 (499) 977-70-01; e-mail: [email protected]).
Kroupin Pavel Yurievich - PhD in Biology, senior researcher of the Centre for Molecular Biotechnology, Russian Timiryazev State Agrarian University (127550, Moscow, Timiryazevskaya street, 49; tel.: +7 (499) 977-70-01; e-mail: [email protected]).
Nguyen Phuong Anh - Master's degree student of the Department of Genetics, Biotechnology, Plant Breeding & Seed Science, Russian Timiryazev State Agrarian University (127550, Moscow, Timiryazevskaya street, 49; tel.: +7 (499) 977-70-01, e-mail: phuonganh.46cntp@ gmail.com).
Kiseleva Anna Vitalievna - PhD in Biology, research scientist of the Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Research Center for Preventive Medicine of the Ministry of Healthcare (101000, Moscow, Petroverigskiy lane, 10; tel.: +7 (499) 790-71-72; e-mail: sanyutabe@ gmail.com).
Karlov Gennady Iliych - Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor, Head of the Centre for Molecular Biotechnology, Russian Timiryazev State Agrarian University (127550, Moscow, Timiryazevskaya street, 49; tel.: +7 (499) 977-70-01; e-mail: [email protected]).
35
