Научная статья на тему 'Детерминанты прекращения или сокращения курения вследствие повышения табачных налогов'

Детерминанты прекращения или сокращения курения вследствие повышения табачных налогов Текст научной статьи по специальности «Экономика и бизнес»

CC BY
77
21
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Журнал
Контроль над табаком и общественное здоровье в Восточной Европе
Область наук

Аннотация научной статьи по экономике и бизнесу, автор научной работы — Тигова Елена Георгиевна

BACKGROUND. Ukraine has adopted State targeted social program for reducing the harmful effects of tobacco on public health in Ukraine till 2012. One of the measures to be implemented is increasing excise tax on tobacco products; therefore, a highly important question is which groups of population are likely to benefit from tax increase through quitting or reducing smoking. METHODS. Data used for analysis were collected in a nationally representative survey of Ukrainian population conducted in 2010. An outcome measure was the anticipated keeping smoking versus quitting (reducing) smoking due to tobacco tax increase. Independent variables included socio-demographic characteristics, experience of quitting smoking, exposure to different tobacco control measures, exposure to tobacco advertizing. Binary logistic regression was used to measure associations. RESULTS. Respondents were more likely to expect to keep smoking after the tobacco tax increase if they were dependent on tobacco (odds ratio 2.57), not interested in quitting, not in favor of tobacco tax increase, and exposed to tobacco advertising on TV and cigarette promotions. Respondents were more likely to expect to reduce or quit smoking if they had higher wealth status (OR=0.55), were aware of tobacco health hazard (OR=0.09), had earlier attempts of quitting smoking, were not exposed to secondhand smoke, observed tobacco-related information on television (OR=0.7) and in newspapers (OR=0.45), and observed advertizing of tobacco on radio (OR=0.33) and in public transport (OR=0.25). CONCLUSIONS. Several aspects are important while implementing taxation policy. It is more likely to result in quitting or reducing smoking among those who are less dependent, have tried quitting smoking earlier, and have higher wealth level. Concurrent smoke-free policies and awareness campaigns may potentiate the effect of taxation policies and are recommended to be developed further.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Похожие темы научных работ по экономике и бизнесу , автор научной работы — Тигова Елена Георгиевна

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

The determinants of quitting or reducing smoking due to the tobacco tax increase

BACKGROUND. Ukraine has adopted State targeted social program for reducing the harmful effects of tobacco on public health in Ukraine till 2012. One of the measures to be implemented is increasing excise tax on tobacco products; therefore, a highly important question is which groups of population are likely to benefit from tax increase through quitting or reducing smoking. METHODS. Data used for analysis were collected in a nationally representative survey of Ukrainian population conducted in 2010. An outcome measure was the anticipated keeping smoking versus quitting (reducing) smoking due to tobacco tax increase. Independent variables included socio-demographic characteristics, experience of quitting smoking, exposure to different tobacco control measures, exposure to tobacco advertizing. Binary logistic regression was used to measure associations. RESULTS. Respondents were more likely to expect to keep smoking after the tobacco tax increase if they were dependent on tobacco (odds ratio 2.57), not interested in quitting, not in favor of tobacco tax increase, and exposed to tobacco advertising on TV and cigarette promotions. Respondents were more likely to expect to reduce or quit smoking if they had higher wealth status (OR=0.55), were aware of tobacco health hazard (OR=0.09), had earlier attempts of quitting smoking, were not exposed to secondhand smoke, observed tobacco-related information on television (OR=0.7) and in newspapers (OR=0.45), and observed advertizing of tobacco on radio (OR=0.33) and in public transport (OR=0.25). CONCLUSIONS. Several aspects are important while implementing taxation policy. It is more likely to result in quitting or reducing smoking among those who are less dependent, have tried quitting smoking earlier, and have higher wealth level. Concurrent smoke-free policies and awareness campaigns may potentiate the effect of taxation policies and are recommended to be developed further.

Текст научной работы на тему «Детерминанты прекращения или сокращения курения вследствие повышения табачных налогов»

ВЖИВАННЯ тютюну ТА ПРИПИНЕННЯ КУРІННЯ

ТЕЗИ КОНФЕРЕНЦІЇ

УДК 613.84:336.221

The determinants of quitting or reducing smoking due to the tobacco tax increase

Olena Tigova

Детермінанти припинення або обмеження куріння внаслідок підвищення тютюнових податків

Тігова Олена Георгіївна

BACKGROUND. Ukraine has adopted State targeted social program for reducing the harmful effects of tobacco on public health in Ukraine till 2012. One of the measures to be implemented is increasing excise tax on tobacco products; therefore, a highly important question is which groups of population are likely to benefit from tax increase through quitting or reducing smoking.

METHODS. Data used for analysis were collected in a nationally representative survey of Ukrainian population conducted in 2010. An outcome measure was the anticipated keeping smoking versus quitting (reducing) smoking due to tobacco tax increase. Independent variables included socio-demographic char-

acteristics, experience of quitting smoking, exposure to different tobacco control measures, exposure to tobacco advertizing. Binary logistic regression was used to measure associations.

RESULTS. Respondents were more likely to expect to keep smoking after the tobacco tax increase if they were dependent on tobacco (odds ratio 2.57), not interested in quitting, not in favor of tobacco tax increase, and exposed to tobacco advertising on TV and cigarette promotions. Respondents were more likely to expect to reduce or quit smoking if they had higher wealth status (OR=0.55), were aware of tobacco health hazard (OR=0.09), had earlier attempts of quitting smoking, were not exposed to

secondhand smoke, observed tobacco-related information on television (OR=0.7) and in newspapers (OR=0.45), and observed advertizing of tobacco on radio (OR=0.33) and in public transport (OR=0.25).

CONCLUSIONS. Several aspects are important while implementing taxation policy. It is more likely to result in quitting or reducing smoking among those who are less dependent, have tried quitting smoking earlier, and have higher wealth level. Concurrent smoke-free policies and awareness campaigns may potentiate the effect of taxation policies and are recommended to be developed further.

92 |Конференція «Економіка, соціологія, теорія і практика охорони здоров'я»

Контроль над тютюном і громадське здоров'я у Східній Європі | 2011,том 1,№2

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Пользовательское соглашение Политика конфиденциальности
Открытая наука