CC BY
43
Diabetes: Clinical Course, i, and Coagulation Disorder
Belikina, PhD Student, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine1; E.S. Malysheva, MD, PhD, Assistant, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine1; A.V. Petrov, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine1;
T.A. Nekrasova, MD, DSc, Professor, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine1;
E.S. Nekaeva, Head of the Emergency Department2;
A.E. Lavrova, MD, DSc, Head of the Department of Pediatrics2;
D.G. Zarubina, Student, Medical Faculty1;
K.A. Atduev, Student, Medical Faculty1;
D.M. Magomedova, Student, Medical Faculty1;
L.G. Strongin, MD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine1
1Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia;
2Infection Hospital for Patients with Novel Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19) at the Institute of Pediatrics of the University Hospital, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 22, Bldg 1, Semashko St., Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia
The aim of the investigation was to study the clinical course of COVID-19 in the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and elucidate possible mechanisms of their mutual aggravation.
Materials and Methods. The study included 64 patients with COVID-19; of them, 32 were with DM (main group) and 32 were DM-free (control group). The groups were formed according to the "case-control" principle. During hospitalization, the dynamics of clinical, glycemic, and coagulation parameters, markers of systemic inflammation, as well as kidney and liver functions were monitored and compared.
Results. Among patients with DM, the course of viral pneumonia was more severe, as evidenced by a 2.2-fold higher number of people with extensive (>50%) lung damage (p=0.05), an increased risk of death according to the CURB-65 algorithm (1.3-fold, p=0.043), and a longer duration of insufficient blood oxygen saturation (p=0.0004). With the combination of COVID-19 and DM, hyperglycemia is persistent, without pronounced variability (MAGE — 1.5±0.6 mmol/L), the levels of C-reactive protein (p=0.028), creatinine (p=0.035), and fibrinogen (p=0.013) are higher, manifestations of hypercoagulability persist longer, including slower normalization of antithrombin III (p=0.012), fibrinogen (p=0.037), and D-dimer (p=0.035).
Conclusion. The course of COVID-19 in patients with DM is associated with a high severity and extension of pneumonia, persistent decrease in oxygen supply, high hyperglycemia, accelerated renal dysfunction, systemic inflammation, and hypercoagulability.
Key words: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; diabetes mellitus; glycemia; hypercoagulation; systemic inflammation.
How to cite: Belikina D.V., Malysheva E.S., Petrov A.V., Nekrasova T.A., Nekaeva E.S., Lavrova A.E., Zarubina D.G., Atduev K.A., Magomedova D.M., Strongin L.G. COVID-19 in patients with diabetes: clinical course, metabolic status, inflammation, and coagulation disorder. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine 2020; 12(5): 6, https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2020.12.5.01
Corresponding author: Tatiana A. Nekrasova, e-mail: tatneсrasova@yandex.ru
Introduction
Epidemiological studies carried out during the current COVID-19 pandemic demonstrate a powerful negative effect of comorbid pathology on the severity and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 viral infection [1-6].
Cardiovascular diseases, arterial hypertension (AH), and diabetes mellitus (DM) are most common conditions found among patients diagnosed with COVID-19. According to the experience of pandemic-affected countries and communities, these comorbidities are associated with the maximal number of complications in COVID-19 infected patients [2-6].
Thus, according to the observations of Chinese scientists, most deaths occurred among patients with comorbid pathology, including AH (53.8%), DM (42.3%), heart disease (19.2%), and strokes (15.4%) [5]. In Italy, the most severely ill patients requiring treatment in the intensive care unit often had AH (49%), other cardiovascular diseases (21%), DM (17%) [7]. Prevalence of DM among the deceased people infected with SARS-CoV-2 was 35.5% [8]. In the USA, among patients with COVID-19, DM was detected in 10.9%, and among those in need of treatment in the ICU — in 32% of cases [9].
According to a recent meta-analysis [10], when COVID-19 is combined with DM, the risk of composite adverse outcome increases (relative risk, RR — 2.38 [1.88; 3.03]; p<0.001), including mortality (RR — 2.12 [1.44; 3.11]; p<0.001), severe course of COVID-19 (RR — 2.45 [1.79; 3.35]; p<0.001), acute respiratory distress syndrome (RR — 4.64 [1.86; 11.58]; p=0.001), and disease progression (RR — 3.31 [1.08; 10.14]; p=0.04) [10]. Obesity, which often occurs in DM, also contributes to the worsening prognosis [11].
These results suggest a significant role of DM in the development of severe clinical forms and mortality in COVID-19. Since DM is often associated with other risk factors like hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases, obesity and old age, such patients require special approaches to their prognosis and treatment strategy.
For the successful treatment of patients with COVID-19 combined with DM, it is important to know the mechanisms that mediate the aggravated course of the combined disease. It is also important to identify predictors of adverse outcomes in patients with a combination of COVID-19 and DM in order to timely choose the optimal management tactics for such patients.
There are different views in the literature regarding the mechanisms underlying the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection complicated by DM. A significant role can be played by inflammatory changes and immunity disorders characteristic of DM, including suppression of neutrophil chemotaxis and T lymphocyte-mediated immune response, impaired cytokine production, and decreased elimination of pathogens [12-16], including SARS-
CoV-2 [17]. The DM-associated obesity adds to systemic inflammation in two ways. Firstly, an excess of adipose tissue contributes to inflammation by increasing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, adipokines, and chemokines. Secondly, obesity is associated with a deficiency of vitamin D — an inhibitor of inflammatory processes. Both mechanisms can increase the severity of COVID-19 [18].
Another potential point of intersection between DM and COVID-19 is the expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). This enzyme serves as a functional component of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS): while ACE converts angiotensin I into angiotensin II, ACE2 converts angiotensin II into angiotensin 1-7. In this process, the vasoconstricting and pro-inflammatory effects of angiotensin II are balanced by the vasodilating and anti-inflammatory properties of angiotensin 1-7 [19, 20]. The role of ACE2 in COVID-19 is twofold: on the one hand, it is the site of binding of SARS-CoV-2 to the cell, and on the other hand, a low expression of ACE2 aggravates the lung damage caused by the infection [20]. Specific mechanisms of aggravated RAAS disorders in the COVID-19/DM combination may be associated with: 1) a decrease in the ratio of ACE2/ ACE in the lungs at late stages of DM [21], which under COVID-19 does not rule out a unidirectional negative effect on the balance of angiotensins; 2) the influence of ACE2 expression in pancreatic p-cells on their function, which suggests the possibility of hyperglycemia in COVID-19 [22, 23]; 3) an impaired endothelial function caused by a direct contact between the virus and ACE2 on the surface of endothelial cells [24]; 4) frequent cases of using RAAS inhibitors to treat hypertension in patients with DM [25, 26].
Liver dysfunction [27, 28], coagulation disorder [29], and endothelial dysfunction [24] in patients with diabetes are considered as major aggravating factors in COVID-19.
More data on the interaction between COVID-19 and DM are needed to predict complications and initiate timely and adequate pathogenetic therapy in this large cohort of patients. To that end, an in-depth study of the course of COVID-19 in patients with DM including the local specifics and the common patterns of the disease is vital.
Considering the above, we aimed to study the clinical course of COVID-19 in the presence of DM and elucidate possible mechanisms of their mutual aggravation.
Materials and Methods
This open comparative study was conducted in 64 patients with COVID-19 hospitalized at the University Hospital of the Privolzhsky Research Medical University from May 19 to June 21, 2020; of those patients, 32 people were diagnosed with DM (main group). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and approved by the Ethics Committee
of the Privolzhsky Research Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from each patient. The first stage of the study was cross-sectional, when the actual clinical characteristics of patients with and without DM were compared at the time of admission. The second stage was prospective in nature and included dynamic assessments of clinical indicators and outcomes in the compared groups. The occurrence of the composite endpoint (ICU treatment and/or death) was considered an unfavorable outcome.
The main criteria for inclusion in the study for all patients were: 1) a positive laboratory test for SARS-CoV-2 (by swab from the nasopharynx and oropharynx); 2) CT signs of viral pneumonia.
Criteria for inclusion in the main group were: 1) type 2 DM diagnosed by medical history, glycemic profile and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) exceeding the normal values in most patients; or 2) DM newly diagnosed from a characteristic glycemic profile and an increase in HbA1c at the time of hospitalization.
The control group (COVID-19 without DM) was created according to the "case-control" principle: after the inclusion of a patient with DM in the main group, the control was added with a hospitalized patient without DM of the same sex and age group.
As a result, the control and main groups were comparable in gender (10 males — 31.2%), age (56.1±13.8 and 60.4±12.0 years), and body mass index (31.8±5.5 and 33.7±6.9, respectively; p>0.05 for all indicators).
Among concomitant diseases, AH was most often detected, and its prevalence was significantly lower in the control compared with the main group — 10 (31.2%) and 20 (62.5%) patients, respectively, p=0.012. In addition, there was a trend towards a higher incidence of CHD among patients with DM — 8 (25.0%) vs 3 (9.4%), p=0.09. The groups did not differ in the occurrence rates of other comorbidities, including chronic liver diseases — 4 (12.5%) and 3 (9.4%), lung diseases — 2 (6.2%) and 1 (3.1%), and kidney diseases — 1 (3.1%) and 2 (6.2%); p>0.05 for all indicators.
In the main group, there were 19 patients (59.4%) with newly diagnosed DM and 13 patients (40.6%) with previously diagnosed DM2. In patients with a history of DM, the duration of diabetes was 3.7±5.9 years; in most cases, a diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy was made before this hospitalization (12 out of 13 patients). In the subgroup of patients with newly diagnosed DM, there were no individuals with manifestations of microangiopathies. Glycated hemoglobin in patients of the main group averaged at 8.3±1.6% (9.1±1.9% in patients with previously diagnosed and 7.9±1.3% in patients with newly diagnosed DM; p=0.062).
Glucose-lowering therapy was prescribed in accordance with the recommendations of the National Medical Research Center of Endocrinology of the Ministry of Health of Russia [30]; 14 people (48.8%) received insulin; of the oral medications, sulfonamides
were used most often (11 patients, 34.4%). Treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection is detailed in Results and Discussion.
The severity of pneumonia and the likelihood of death were evaluated using a modified CURB-65 scale, the nature and volume (percent) of lung tissue damage — by CT, blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) — by pulse oximetry. Hematological and biochemical indices, C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured using standard techniques. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were assayed according to Reitman-Frankel, hemostasis parameters (D-dimer, INR, antithrombin III (AT III) activity, prothrombin time (PTT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)) — by coagulometry using an ACL Elite Pro analyzer (Instrumentation Laboratory, USA).
The glycemic profile in patients with diabetes was studied by repeated measurements of glucose levels using a desktop analyzer (9 measurements per day) and the levels of glycated hemoglobin HbA1c — using a NycoCard Reader II device (Axis-Shield PoC AS, Norway). In addition, 7 patients from the main group underwent continuous monitoring of blood glucose (CGM) in a blind mode using an iPRO-2 continuous monitoring system (Medtronic, USA). This measurement was made during the first four days of the hospital stay; the average age of patients in this subgroup was 52.2±9.4 years and the duration of DM — 4.5±2.7 years. According to CGM, the mean glycemic parameters, the duration (percentage of time) of hyper- and hypoglycemia (i.e. >7.8 and <3.9 mmol/L), as well as the variability of glycemia in terms of the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) were assessed.
For statistical processing of the results, we used the Statistica 8.0 and MedCalc software packages. To compare quantitative data between two independent samples, the Mann-Whitney test was used; for qualitative comparison — the c2 and Fisher tests, for multiple intragroup comparisons in dynamics — the Friedman method (pdyn), for two quantitative indicators in dynamics — the Wilcoxon test, and for correlation analysis — the Spearman's correlation. To determine the predictors of adverse outcomes, univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used in the logistic regression model. The data samples were characterized by the mean value ± standard deviation (M±a). Differences were considered significant at p<0.05.
Results and Discussion
The course of COVID-19 and its outcomes in both groups are characterized in Table 1.
Among patients with background DM, viral pneumonia was more severe, as evidenced by a 2.2-fold larger proportion of patients with extensive (>50%) involvement of lung tissue, according to CT results (p=0.050). There was a 1.5-fold smaller number of patients showing a rapid positive dynamics with CT during the first week of
Ta bl e 1
The course and treatment of COVID-19 in patients without and with diabetes mellitus
Index Control group (n=32) Main group (n=32) P
Severity of pneumonia (CURB-65)
risk of death (%) (M±ff) 4.5±1.6 6.0±3.6 0.043
CT at admission (abs. number/%)
percent of lung damage:
less than 50 26/81.2 19/59.4 0.050
more than 50 6/18.8 13/40.6 —
CT, 1st week (abs. number/%)
positive dynamics 23/71.9 15/46.9 0.037
Treatment of COVID-19 (abs. number/%)
glucocorticoids 10/31.2 15/46.9 0.15
anticoagulants: 32/100 32/100 —
enoxaparin sodium in the minimum dose 12/37.6 6/18.8 0.082
antiviral therapy: 32/100 32/100 —
hydroxychloroquine 24/75.0 14/43.7 0.011
lopinavir/ritonavir 3/9.4 9/28.1 0.053
umifenovir 6/18.8 9/28.1 0.28
antibiotic therapy: 32/100 32/100 —
azithromycin 23/71.9 20/62.5 0.30
ceftriaxone 6/18.8 10/31.2 0.49
levofloxacin 13/40.6 16/50.0 0.31
amoxiclav 11/34.4 16/50.0 0.30
others 5/15.6 3/9.4 0.35
immunosuppressants
and other immunoactive agents: 17/53.1 25/78.1 0.032
baricitinib 2/6.2 6/18.8 0.26
human antibodies (Ig) 4/12.5 10/31.2 0.24
interferon a-2b 11/34.4 9/28.1 0.39
Respiratory rate on admission (M±a) 19.0±1.5 21.0±4.1 0.005
O2 saturation (%) (M±a):
on admission, day 1 94.4±2.8 93.1±4.4 —
day 2 90.3±17.0 92.4±4.6 0.29
day 3 94.8±2.5 94.4±2.4 0.34
day 4 95.3±2.2 92.8±4.2 0.69
day 5 94.8±3.3 93.6±3.6 0.033
day 6 95.7±2.4 93.8±2.9 0.066
day 7 95.8±2.3 93.8±2.9 0.024
Pdyn* 0.042 0.18 0.004
Number of days before normalization
of SpO2 (M±a) 4.1±3.8 9.8±6.8 0.0004
Unfavorable outcome (abs. number/%): 3/9.4 6/18.8 0.24
hospitalization in the ICU 3/9.4 6/18.8 0.24
fatal outcome 1/3.1 1/3.1 —
Duration of treatment, bed-days (M±a) 14.3±3.1 17.1±4.8 0.013
* pdyn — significance of the differences between values in dynamics (by Friedman).
treatment (p=0.037) and a 1.3-fold higher risk of death as calculated from the CURB-65 scale (p=0.043).
The severe course of pneumonia in DM was associated with more pronounced symptoms of respiratory failure, including an increased respiratory rate at the time of admission (p=0.005). We observed a sustained decrease in blood oxygen saturation: on
days 1-3 of hospital stay, SpO2 was similarly decreased in both groups, on days 4-7, it remained low only in patients with the combined pathology, where its normalization required a 2.4-fold longer time (p=0.0004).
The increased severity of viral pneumonia in the main group required a more aggressive therapy. As shown in Table 1, patients with COVID-19 and DM were less
likely to receive hydroxychloroquine (p=0.011); instead they were prescribed modern immunosuppressors and immunoactive drugs (p=0.032) with a trend to receive combined antiviral agents (lopinavir + ritonavir, p=0.053) and larger doses of anticoagulants (p=0.082).
As a result, the duration of treatment (total bed-days) in the main group was significantly longer (p=0.013) with an insignificantly higher proportion of patients who reached the composite endpoint (hospitalization in the ICU and/or death, p=0.24).
Thus, the co-occurrence of COVID-19 and DM in patients was characterized by a greater severity and extension of viral pneumonia, a persistent decrease
in blood oxygen supply (by pulse oximetry and clinical signs), and a greater need for active therapy (modern immunosuppressive, immunoactive and combined antiviral drugs, as well as higher doses of anticoagulants). In these patients, the duration of hospital stay was significantly longer.
Another area of our research was the metabolic changes and laboratory characteristics of patients with COVID-19 without and with DM, as well as their relationship with the severity of the disease and the outcomes (Table 2).
The levels of blood glucose in the main group, as expected, exceeded those in control (p<0.00001).
Ta bl e 2
Metabolic, biochemical, and coagulation parameters of patients with COVID-19 in the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus (M±a)
Index Control group (n=32) Main group (n=32) P
Blood glucose on admission (mmol/L) 4.8±0.8 8.1±2.9 0.0000
Creatinine (^imol/L):
on admission 85.9±25.4 98.4±32.7 0.23
days 3-5 98.6±25.6 113.6±33.4 0.035
at discharge 96.2±19.1 95.2±27.9 0.56
Pdyn* 0.43 0.020 —
Glomerular filtration rate (ml/min):
on admission 74.7±17.97 65.5±21.8 0.10
days 3-5 64.2±17.6 55.9±19.8 0.09
at discharge 64.7±16.0 67.3±23.0 0.61
pdyn* 0.31 0.067 —
D-dimer (ng/ml):
on admission 824.2±1291.8 986.4±1690.7 0.89
day 2 618.0±1020.4 421.6±632.5 0.81
days 3-5 663.8±1215.3 615.4±987.5 0.92
at discharge 59.1±111.2 31.2±106.9 0.22
pdyn* 0.004 0.0003 —
Day of D-dimer normalization (if abnormal
at baseline) 5.6±4.5 9.0±6.3 0.035
Fibrinogen (g/L):
on admission 5.5±1.6 6.0±1.8 0.22
days 3-5 4.4±0.9 5.2±1.2 0.013
at discharge 3.9±0.9 4.0±1.5 0.73
pdyn* 0.00001 0.00001 —
Day of fibrinogen normalization (if abnormal
at baseline) 8.3±5.5 11.8±5.5 0.037
APTT (s):
on admission 30.1±6.1 34.9±26.8 0.91
days 3-5 33.7±7.1 40.6±24.8 0.77
at discharge 37.0±17.4 36.9±16.1 0.55
pdyn* 0.004 0.23 —
PTT (s):
on admission 12.8±1.3 13.4±3.7 0.38
days 3-5 12.4±1.6 13.6±4.1 0.064
at discharge 16.4±19.3 12.8±2.9 0.81
pdyn* 0.28 0.019 —
End of the Table 2
Index Control group (n=32) Main group (n=32) P
INR:
on admission 1.1±0.1 1.1±0.3 0.51
days 3-5 1.1±0.1 1.1±0.4 0.52
at discharge 1.1±0.3 1.1±0.3 0.92
Pdyn* 0.29 0.16 —
Day of INR normalization (if abnormal
at baseline) 3.7±4.1 6.1±6.5 0.14
AT III (%):
on admission 107.0±13.7 107.4±19.5 0.64
days 3-5 96.2±13.2 95.4±13.3 0.96
at discharge 96.1±11.7 98.0±13.2 0.64
pdyn* 0.001 0.058 —
Day of AT III normalization (if abnormal
at baseline) 1.6±1.9 4.4±5.6 0.012
ALT (units/L):
on admission 36.7±23.7 40.2±25.4 0.56
days 3-5 59.9±55.8 89.6±96.1 0.22
at discharge 58.1±45.6 63.9±78.8 0.91
pdyn* 0.002 0.017 —
AST (units/L):
on admission 34.8±16.6 49.9±44.5 0.16
days 3-5 54.8±46.8 68.5±62.2 0.26
at discharge 37.6±25.4 43.6±29.0 0.62
pdyn* 0.057 0.015 —
CRP (mg/L):
on admission 41.6±37.3 91.3±90.0 0.028
days 3-5 51.1±61.2 97.1±87.3 0.015
days 7-10 53.5±57.3 60.1±65.5 0.86
at discharge 7.3±9.9 10.3±16.7 0.50
pdyn* 0.001 0.00001 —
Hemoglobin (g/L):
on admission 138.1±12.97 137.5±13.8 0.86
at discharge 125.7±16.8 125.5±16.3 0.90
pdyn** 0.0001 0.0003 —
Hematocrit (%):
on admission 40.7±3.7 40.9±3.8 0.61
at discharge 37.7±4.0 37.9±4.5 0.70
pdyn** 0.0001 0.003 —
Leukocytes (*109/L):
on admission 6.3±2.7 6.7±3.1 0.71
at discharge 5.1±1.9 6.2±1.6 0.012
pdyn** 0.021 0.63 —
ESR (mm/h):
on admission 29.3±21.5 34.4±21.3 0.22
at discharge 16.9±10.6 26.0±20.0 0.048
n ** pdyn 0.007 0.16 —
* pdyn — significance of the differences between values in dynamics by Friedman; ** — by Wilcoxon.
Hyperglycemia in patients with DM persisted, especially on the first and second days of hospitalization (Figure 1) even with the aggressive glucose-lowering therapy.
The results of CGM, which was carried out during the first four days of inpatient treatment in seven patients with COVID-19 and DM, confirmed the presence of
к;
о
Ю О
ю о
I
I
а
к ш
е.
z:
CD
Г
си
С
Е I
О
р»
И
s
I
H
í CT»
er й
S f
и
И р
¥ о и 49.
И N
Щ 5■
-3 »—t-Q_ Ф
är <" s
|л я ®
СЛ CQ CD с
® 5-
ä. со
2 В
3 о
& 3"
з Т <а сл 1—1-о
CD
О IV)
О '—
о.
5' £
to g.
З1 I
о
-О =
? О
* < CD CD
g. OS"
03
сл
Q.
03 ТЗ
S » 5 я
CD СЛ
о- -Й-
03 <
— о
s <
о 2
■й 3
Я ®
О 2.
CD
о со « £
л
со
I
о
о <
З1 О
О" IV)
о
>< сл о.
CD О
CD S
Ё. 9
о -»■
■a cd
3 03
® ^
3 Q.
ff 3
Oí
3 о
CD
5 ô g s.
CD 03 Q. О
■Я ~
=r о
О TT сл 5'
я®
й и ? о
03 03
О 3
5 сл о
о -5'
's о I-3
3 -h
CD 03
сл a о
м-
œ S.
о.
CQ О CD 03 3 З1 CD сл
CQ
_ > CD о
< m
143
03 03
03
а „ S
CD СЛ
3
3 I
CD о
CQ 03
S о
CD СЗ"
3 3
03 й:
^ -
-
со CQ
IV) CD
> CD
о
m ^
143 s
CD 3
X CD
з <"
8 §
сл <
® s
Q. СЛ
5' оз
rt- СЛ
CD У:
i » CD й" Я" cd
03 о. О"
i: О-
сл ><
3 сл
Ü"S
3= Q.
сл
5? M
оз —^ О О
й-
О "П
= со' ° 3
ZT ® >< IV) ТЗ ■ CD -1
CQ ><
о CD
о о
» 8 О.
=f < 3 Ю
ТЗ 3"
CD >< ТЗ О CD
03
< — ^
CD сл 2
-1 tó CD
ю ? Э.
CD 03
CQ ill § e 3
CD ^
Q.
03
3" ^
о о-
E g.
™ О
CD 2 3 =:
fa
¡I
i-l CD T3
СЛ S
о >
® s.
сл m '
' 31 3
« ^
CD ^ 00 3 О СО оз ' ^
!± 3
СЯ V, CD
со О
=5
3 3 CD
3 ^ ~Î
lu
03 < T3
Q. â; 03
i £ 3 ®
« 2 » SS
£2. S СЛ гя-
§ a« s
3. о
СЛ Ä
5' S.
3- CD
CD 03 03
s. S г
P _.CQ
=;-CQ s
О о 03 ë
3= 0
CD о
a s
Ti- ф Й
< 3 03 о ñ 0 3 3 So-.«
СЛ 03
CD CD ТЗ СЛ О ТЗ
СЛ 03.
о
со^
СП
CD У _
03. Q. CD
03 1—1-03
CQ -
i ? ТЗ ®
О CD -h < CD
ТЗ — 03
Ä о Б'
3- CQ СЛ с
о
о о
О СЛ =¡ ®
CD
CD О Q. 3
СЛ CD TT Q.
3" CD
® CQ
T3 ><
Si " Я1 ®
3 3 »
^ 03
СЛ СЛ
о о
оз' 1-1-CD Q.
S —! CD CQ
03 Й
S CQ Q. — С
03 3 о
CQ ТЗ СЛ CQ = CD
< Ä® ai о S
W CD ^J о
03 _
° I
СЛ 3
CD "
3 3-
СЛ ><
3" CD
CD
CD
CD
3
о о
О- О
Б' 3
^ СЛ
ТЗ 3 03
»las
о со.
— о
Ц 2 СЛ' CD 03 СЛ CD
з s
^ CD Ö 3 S-
о -
-h ТЗ 3^
— 03 CD с Ч'
3 CD 03. Q- <
_. CD
9: 3 О
si»
T3 ,_,
CD СО
CQ ><
о со CD СЛ
з "
03 > о
° G
03 о
CQ
^ 0
CD CD
a 3
О 03
? СЛ
03 CD
03 03 sf СЛ g. 03
О "а
- 03
iü > CD
o ¡/i'
з' 03
Q. Ц СЛ
® ® о
СЛ Q
. ф ®
> СЛ
СЛ ТЗ О
^ о р
rt-- СЛ 03 3" CD 3
Q. С
Jo о о
CD 3 CQ
5 CD
О CD 3
CD
О 5' i?
03 СЛ
СЛ ТЗ
8. i
Si 5
CD С ^ Q. СЛ CQ
CD
< ^ ~
С О m
я & 3-
^ S 3
>< 03
CD О
3 3
о _
«e. S,
0
O" tQ
з' с'
О
1 °
1 £
CD
02 ^
С
S œ
i—к
CD rt-Q. О
CD -
CD CD
§= i: Ю
g i 1/1
S ® 3
7Г-0 CD
3 9 ÔT
CD 2 о CD
СЛ ÇD ff 03 - -
д 03 о
3
CO СЛ CD
СЛ
CO
Q.
"S &
=5.
f—к 3
CD (Q
CQ CQ
С С
О О
О о
СЛ СЛ
CD CD
О ¡o
TS о
сл
сл о
о о
сл (Q С
о о
сл о
3 о
ТЗ U
3 ы з' CQ
-т
о с
ТЗ
>
ö
£
z о еч в ?б еч
CZ3
РЧ >
!»
О M
еч
CZ3
inversely with the parameters of blood O2 saturation (R=-0.42; p=0.018), which indirectly confirmed the negative effect of high hyperglycemia on the respiratory function and oxygen supply under COVID-19. In addition, for the entire cohort of patients, glycemia turned out to be an independent predictor of severe pneumonia (the CURB-65 score in the upper quartile range): odds ratio (OR) 1.02 [1.00; 1.03]; p=0.016, according to one-way regression analysis.
On the other hand, HbAlc significantly correlated only with the duration of DM (R=0.47; p=0.015), the incidence of late DM complications (R=0.41; p=0.017), and with the blood lactate level (R=0.42; p=0.018); the expected weak correlation with the level of blood glucose at admission was also noted (R=0.30; p=0.034). Thus, the level of HbA1c was consistently higher in patients with a long-term history of severe DM; it was associated with some metabolic disorders, but, unlike hyperglycemia, had no prognostic value for predicting a severe course of the disease. This result largely corroborates with the data available in the literature [38] and does not rule out that an unsatisfactory previous control of DM may have an implicit negative impact on the course of COVID-19 + DM; this negative influence may be mediated by uncontrolled hyperglycemia at the initial stage and additional metabolic complications.
Another factor that significantly affects the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection was the functional state of the kidneys. Typically, in both groups there was a slight decrease in renal function on days 3-5 of the hospital stay followed by recovery by the time of discharge. In Table 2, these changes are more noticeable in patients with DM, e.g., the significantly higher values of creatinine compared with control after 3-5 days of therapy (p=0.035), as well as the statistically significant dynamic fluctuations (pdyn=0.020).
The creatinine level on days 3-5 served as one of the laboratory predictors of reaching the predefined outcome (admission to the ICU and/or death) for the pooled cohort of patients with COVID-9 in the univariate analysis: OR — 1.02 [1.00; 1.06]; p=0.011. Among patients with DM, creatinine failed to significantly predict the poor outcome (OR — 1.02 [0.99; 1.055]; p=0.083), but it was associated with a more severe pneumonia (CURB-65 scale; R=0.43; p=0.018).
For assessing damage to the liver caused by COVID-19 and insufficient therapy, the levels of hepatic transaminases was monitored over time. Like creatinine, those showed an increase by day 3-5 of hospitalization with a subsequent decrease (for ALT, pdyn=0.017), while the differences between the main and control groups were not statistically significant (see Table 2).
According to the literature, liver dysfunction occurs both in DM and COVID-19. In patients with combined (DM and COVID-19), the liver involvement (as it was put by Marhl et al. [39]) forms the pathological "hepatic axis", common pathogenetic mechanisms leading to the mutual aggravation of the diseases. ALT is a
sensitive marker of liver damage in both pathologies. In COVID-19, even a slight increase in ALT is considered a predictor of a severe course of this infection [27, 28, 40]. In people with DM, a slight but persistent increase in ALT could be associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [39, 41].
Our results are in good agreement with the literature and, in general, confirm the significance of the ALT level for predicting unfavorable outcomes in all patients under study: in univariate analysis (OR — 1.03 [1.01; 1.06]; p=0.009). However, with a combination of COVID-19 and DM, the ALT level was not a significant predictor of the outcome. This may be due to the short duration of DM and, therefore, the absence of hepatosis in most patients. Nevertheless, the correlation analysis confirmed an increase in the severity of pneumonia (by the CURB-65 scale) with an increase in ALT level (r=0.55; p=0.001). In the main group, direct correlations of ALT with glycemic levels on the first day of treatment were also found (including that for fasting glucose, R=0.44; p=0.022); this finding does not rule out an additional deterioration of carbohydrate metabolism in the case of hepatic dysfunction and may partially mediate pneumonia aggravation.
One of the recognized common links in the pathogeneses of COVID-19 and DM is systemic inflammation, markers of which play the role of predictors of severe course of both diseases [42, 43]. According to our data, in both groups, the average CRP level was significantly increased throughout hospitalization, including the day of discharge from the hospital. This result confirms the typicality and significance of inflammatory changes in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 (see Table 2). In addition, in univariate analysis in the pooled cohort of patients, CRP was identified as a statistically significant predictor of the outcome (OR — 1.02 [1.00; 1.04]; p=0.003). The combined pathology though was characterized by a greater activity and sustained pattern of inflammation. Thus, the level of CRP in the main group was significantly higher than that in control, both at admission (p=0.028) and 3-5 days after hospitalization (p=0.015). Initially, ESR increased similarly in both observation groups (p=0.22), but in dynamics, it decreased more slowly in the presence of DM, due to which, at discharge, ESR significantly exceeded the control values (p=0.048) and the upper limit of the norm.
Another central pathogenetic factor complicating the course of COVID-19 is coagulopathy that manifests by hypercoagulability and a high risk of venous, arterial, and microvascular thrombosis [29]. Apparently, the likelihood of thrombosis in SARS-CoV-2 infection exceeds the similar risks in other acute infectious diseases. This is explained by a specific effect of this virus on blood coagulation processes, mediated by particularly high inflammation, production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, imbalance of RAAS mediators, and direct contact between the virus and the endothelium [24, 29, 44-46].
According to our data, hypercoagulability and high thrombogenic activity are characteristic of the entire cohort of SARS-CoV-2 infected subjects (see Table 2). In both studied groups, the average levels of D-dimer and fibrinogen significantly exceeded the norm, at least at the beginning of the hospital period; later on, the observed lengthening of APTT was less than expected (considering that anticoagulant therapy was used in 100% of cases, see Materials and Methods).
In a comparative assessment of blood coagulation indices, we noted significant differences between the main and control groups, indicating a greater severity and duration of coagulopathies in patients with concomitant DM. Thus, with DM, the abnormally high levels of AT III (p=0.012), fibrinogen (p=0.037), and D-dimer (p=0.035) remained significantly longer. On top of that, a greater degree of hyperfibrinogenemia was noted, especially on days 3-5 (p=0.013), the PTT decreased over time (p=0.019) and no APTT lengthening occurred (p=0.23). In addition, according to univariate regression analysis, the level of fibrinogen at admission significantly predicted the adverse outcomes in the pooled cohort of patients (OR — 2.08 [1.27; 3.40]; p=0.0007).
In order to identify the most significant predictors of reaching the defined outcome (hospitalization in the ICU and/or death), we carried out a step-by-step multivariate regression analysis of clinical and laboratory parameters identified in univariate analysis as significant or close to significant predictors. We found that for the pooled cohort of patients (with and without DM), fibrinogen and CRP had predictive values (OR — 2.3 [1.11; 4.76] and 1.02 [1.004; 1.045], respectively; p=0.00025), and for the DM subgroup that was fibrinogen (OR — 2.6 [1.09; 6.22]; p=0.003).
The obtained data confirm the role of coagulopathy in the pathogenesis and clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection, its increased severity and duration in concomitant DM, as well as its contribution to the development of poor outcomes. Considering the results of one- and multivariate analysis, it cannot be ruled out that the COVID-19 associated liver and kidney dysfunctions may manifest as coagulopathies.
Conclusions
The results of the study allowed us to draw the following conclusions:
1. The presence of concomitant DM in patients with COVID-19 is associated with a greater severity and extension of pneumonia, a sustained decrease in oxygen supply, an increased need for modern immunosuppressive, immunoactive, and combined antiviral drugs, as well as in high doses of anticoagulants, which in total leads to a significant lengthening of the hospital stay.
2. High hyperglycemia in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and DM is associated with a decrease in blood oxygen saturation, a more severe respiratory failure,
and an aggravated course of pneumonia. The increased level of HbAlc is less correlative with the pneumonia severity. Previous imbalanced diabetes may have an implicit negative effect on the course of COVID-19 + DM, which may be mediated by uncontrolled glycemia and aggravated metabolic disorders.
3. Patients with COVID-19 are characterized by impaired renal and hepatic functions, which may worsen in the first days of hospitalization; the levels of creatinine and AST are interrelated with the risk of unfavorable outcomes of the disease (hospitalization in the ICU and/ or death). In DM, these dysfunctions can worsen and lead to high creatinine levels.
4. With COVID-19, pronounced and persistent systemic inflammation occurs, which decreases but does not disappear by the end of the hospital period. The presence of DM in those patients additional increases the systemic inflammation. Abnormally high CRP levels predict a severe course of COVID-19.
5. Patients with COVID-19 are characterized by hypercoagulability, which is accompanied by a pronounced and sustained increase in the levels of D-dimer and fibrinogen in the blood. The severity of coagulopathies and the time needed for normalization of the coagulogram were greater in those with DM. Fibrinogen level can serve an independent predictor of adverse outcomes of COVID-19, especially in patients with DM.
Research funding and conflicts of interest. The
study was not supported by any financial sources, and there are no conflicts of interest related to this study.
References
1. Angelidi A.M., Belanger M.J., Mantzoros C.S. COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus: what we know, how our patients should be treated now, and what should happen next. Metabolism 2020; 107: 154245, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. metabol.2020.154245.
2. Guan W.J., Liang W.H., Zhao Y., Liang H.R., Chen Z.S., Li Y.M., Liu X.Q., Chen R.C., Tang C.L., Wang T., Ou C.Q., Li L., Chen P.Y., Sang L., Wang W., Li J.F., Li C.C., Ou L.M., Cheng B., Xiong S., Ni Z.Y., Xiang J., Hu Y., Liu L., Shan H., Lei C.L., Peng Y.X., Wei L., Liu Y., Hu Y.H., Peng P., Wang J.M., Liu J.Y., Chen Z., Li G., Zheng Z.J., Qiu S.Q., Luo J., Ye C.J., Zhu S.Y., Cheng L.L., Ye F., Li S.Y., Zheng J.P., Zhang N.F., Zhong N.S., He J.X. China Medical Treatment Expert Group for COVID-19. Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysis. Eur Respir J 2020; 55(5): 2000547, https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00547-2020.
3. Wu Z., McGoogan J.M. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.2648.
4. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim clinical guidance for management of patients with confirmed coronavirus disease (COVID-19). U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; 2020. URL: https://www.cdc.gov/
coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/clinical-guidance-management-patients.html.
5. Deng S.Q., Peng H.J. Characteristics of and public health responses to the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in China. J Clin Med 2020; 9(2): 575, https://doi.org/10.3390/ jcm9020575.
6. Onder G., Rezza G., Brusaferro S. Case-fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to COVID-19 in Italy. JAMA 2020, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.4683.
7. Grasselli G., Zangrillo A., Zanella A., Antonelli M., Cabrini L., Castelli A., Cereda D., Coluccello A., Foti G., Fumagalli R., lotti G., Latronico N., Lorini L., Merler S., Natalini G., Piatti A., Ranieri M.V., Scandroglio A.M., Storti E., Cecconi M., Pesenti A.; COVID-19 Lombardy ICU Network; Nailescu A., Corona A., Zangrillo A., Protti A., Albertin A., Forastieri Molinari A., Lombardo A., Pezzi A., Benini A., Scandroglio A.M., Malara A., Castelli A., Coluccello A., Micucci A., Pesenti A., Sala A., Alborghetti A., Antonini B., Capra C., Troiano C., Roscitano C., Radrizzani D., Chiumello D., Coppini D., Guzzon D., Costantini E., Malpetti E., Zoia E., Catena E., Agosteo E., Barbara E., Beretta E., Boselli E., Storti E., Harizay F., Della Mura F., Lorini F.L., Donato Sigurta F., Marino F., Mojoli F., Rasulo F., Grasselli G., Casella G., De Filippi G., Castelli G., Aldegheri G., Gallioli G., Lotti G., Albano G., Landoni G., Marino G., Vitale G., Battista Perego G., Evasi G., Citerio G., Foti G., Natalini G., Merli G., Sforzini I., Bianciardi L., Carnevale L., Grazioli L., Cabrini L., Guatteri L., Salvi L., Dei Poli M., Galletti M., Gemma M., Ranucci M., Riccio M., Borelli M., Zambon M., Subert M., Cecconi M., Mazzoni M.G., Raimondi M., Panigada M., Belliato M., Bronzini N., Latronico N., Petrucci N., Belgiorno N., Tagliabue P., Cortellazzi P., Gnesin P., Grosso P., Gritti P., Perazzo P., Severgnini P., Ruggeri P., Sebastiano P., Covello R.D., Fernandez-Olmos R., Fumagalli R., Keim R., Rona R., Valsecchi R., Cattaneo S., Colombo S., Cirri S., Bonazzi S., Greco S., Muttini S., Langer T., Alaimo V., Viola U. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy region, Italy. JAMA 2020; 323(16): 1574-1581, https://doi.org/10.1001/ jama.2020.5394.
8. Fadini G.P., Morieri M.L., Longato E., Avogaro A. Prevalence and impact of diabetes among people infected with SARS-CoV-2. J Endocrinol Invest 2020; 43(6): 867-869, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-020-01236-2.
9. CDC COVID-19 Response Team. Preliminary estimates of the prevalence of selected underlying health conditions among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 — United States, February 12-March 28, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020; 69: 382-386, https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6913e2.
10. Huang I., Lim M.A., Pranata R. Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased mortality and severity of disease in COVID-19 pneumonia — a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2020; 14(4): 395403, https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.dsx.2020.04.018.
11. Puig-Domingo M., Marazuela M., Giustina A. COVID-19 and endocrine diseases. A statement from the European Society of Endocrinology. Endocrine 2020; 68(1): 2-5, https:// doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02294-5.
12. Berbudi A., Rahmadika N., Cahyadi A.I., Ruslami R. Type 2 diabetes and its impact on the immune system. Curr Diabetes Rev 2020; 16(5): 442-449, https://doi.org/10.2174/15 73399815666191024085838.
13. Delamaire M., Maugendre D., Moreno M., Le Goff M.C., Allannic H., Genetet B. Impaired leucocyte functions in diabetic patients. Diabet Med 1997; 14(1): 29-34, https:// doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199701)14:1<29::AID-DIA300>3.0.CC>;2-V.
14. Hodgson K., Morris J., Bridson T., Govan B., Rush C., Ketheesan N. Immunological mechanisms contributing to the double burden of diabetes and intracellular bacterial infections. Immunology 2015; 144(2): 171-185, https://doi.org/10.1111/ imm.12394.
15. Zykova S.N., Jenssen T.G., Berdal M., Clsen R., Myklebust R., Seljelid R. Altered cytokine and nitric oxide secretion in vitro by macrophages from diabetic type II-like db/db mice. Diabetes 2000; 49: 1451-1458, https://doi. org/10.2337/diabetes.49.9.1451.
16. Kulcsar K.A., Coleman C.M., Beck S.E., Frieman M.B. Comorbid diabetes results in immune dysregulation and enhanced disease severity following MERS-CoV infection. JCI Insight 2019; 4(20): e131774, https://doi.org/10.1172/jci. insight.131774.
17. Chen X., Hu W., Ling J., Mo P., Zhang Y., Jiang Q., Ma Z., Cao Q., Deng L., Song S., Zheng R., Shicheng G., Ke H., Gui X., Lundkvist A., Li J., Lindahl J.F., Xiong Y. Hypertension and diabetes delay the viral clearance in COVID-19 patients. medRxiv2020, https://doi.org/10.1101/202 0.03.22.20040774.
18. Maffetone P.B., Laursen P.B. The perfect storm: coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic meets overfat pandemic. Front Public Health 2020; 8: 135, https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpubh.2020.00135.
19. Tikellis C., Thomas M.C. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a key modulator of the renin angiotensin system in health and disease. Int J Pept 2012; 2012: 256294, https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/256294.
20. AlGhatrif M., Cingolani O., Lakatta E.G. The dilemma of coronavirus disease 2019, aging, and cardiovascular disease: insights from cardiovascular aging science. JAMA Cardiol 2020, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1329.
21. Roca-Ho H., Riera M., Palau V., Pascual J., Soler M.J. Characterization of ACE and ACE2 expression within different organs of the NOD mouse. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18(3): 563, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18030563.
22. Bindom S.M., Lazartigues E. The sweeter side of ACE2: physiological evidence for a role in diabetes. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2009; 302: 193-202, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. mce.2008.09.020.
23. Yang J.K., Lin S.S., Ji X.J., Guo L.M. Binding of SARS coronavirus to its receptor damages islets and causes acute diabetes. Acta Diabetol 2010; 47(3): 193-199, https://doi. org/10.1007/s00592-009-0109-4.
24. Varga Z., Flammer A.J., Steiger P., Haberecker M., Andermatt R., Zinkernagel A.S., Mehra M.R., Schuepbach R.A., Ruschitzka F., Moch H. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet 2020; 395(10234): 1417-1418, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736 (20)30937-5.
25. Diaz J.H. Hypothesis: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers may increase the risk of severe COVID-19. J Trav Med 2020; 27(3): taaa041, https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaa041.
26. Pal R., Bhansali A. COVID-19, diabetes mellitus and ACE2: the conundrum. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020; 162: 108132, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108132.
27. Zhang C., Shi L., Wang F.S. Liver injury in COVID-19: management and challenges. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5(5): 428-430, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(20) 30057-1.
28. Zhang Y., Zheng L., Liu L., Zhao M., Xiao J., Zhao Q. Liver impairment in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective analysis of 115 cases from a single center in Wuhan city, China. Liver Int 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14455.
29. Abou-Ismail M.Y., Diamond A., Kapoor S., Arafah Y., Nayak L. The hypercoagulable state in COVID-19: incidence, pathophysiology, and management. Thromb Res 2020; 194: 101-115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.06.029.
30. Endokrinopatii i COVID-19. Neotlozhnye sostoyaniya, ikh profilaktika i lechenie. Rekomendatsii FGBU "NMITs endokrinologii" Minzdrava Rossii [Endocrinopathies and COVID-19. Emergencies, their prevention and treatment. Recommendations of the Federal State Budgetary Institution "National Medical Research Center of Endocrinology" of the Ministry of Health of Russia]. ENTs; 2020. URL: https://www. endocrincentr.ru/sites/default/files/all/news2020/Institut%20 Diabeta/COVID-19_enc2020-4.pdf.
31. Muniyappa R., Gubbi S. COVID-19 pandemic, corona viruses, and diabetes mellitus. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2020; 318(5): E736-E741, https://doi.org/10.1152/ ajpendo.00124.2020.
32. Maddaloni E., Buzzetti R. COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus: unveiling the interaction of two pandemics. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2020; e33213321, https://doi.org/10.1002/ dmrr.3321.
33. Wang D., Hu B., Hu C., Zhu F., Liu X., Zhang J., Wang B., Xiang H., Cheng Z., Xiong Y., Zhao Y., Li Y., Wang X., Peng Z. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020; 323(11): 1061-1069, https://doi. org/10.1001/jama.2020.1585.
34. Liu W., Li H. COVID-19: attacks the 1-beta chain of hemoglobin and captures the porphyrin to inhibit human heme metabolism. ChemRxiv 2020, https://doi.org/10.26434/ chemrxiv. 11938173.v7.
35. Hussain A., Bhowmik B., do Vale Moreira N.C. COVID-19 and diabetes: knowledge in progress. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020; 162: 108142, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. diabres.2020.108142.
36. Philips B.J., Meguer J.X., Redman J., Baker E.H. Factors the appearance of glucose in upper and lower
secretions. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29(12): i .org/10.1007/s00134-003-1961-2.
37. Hill M.A., Mantzoros C., Sowers J. Commentary: COVID-19 in patients with diabetes. Metabolism 2020; 107: 154217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154217.
38. Bode B., Garrett V., Messler J., McFarland R., Crowe J., Booth R., Klonoff D.C. Glycemic characteristics and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the United States. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2020; 14(4): 813-821, https:// doi.org/10.1177/1932296820924469.
39. Marhl M., Grubelnik V., Magdic M., Markovic R. Diabetes and metabolic syndrome as risk factors for COVID-19. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2020; 14(4): 671-677, https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.dsx.2020.05.013.
40. Jiang X., Coffee M., Bari A., Wang J., Jiang X., Huang J., Shi J., Dai J., Cai J., Zhang T., Wu Z., He G., Huang Y. Towards an artificial intelligence framework for data-driven prediction of coronavirus clinical severity. Comput Mater Continua (CMC) 2020; 63(1): 537-551, https://doi. org/10.32604/cmc.2020.010691.
41. Harris E.H. Elevated liver function tests in type 2 diabetes. Clin Diabetes 2005; 23(3): 115-119, https://doi. org/10.2337/diaclin.23.3.115.
42. Zhou F., Yu T., Du R., Fan G., Liu Y., Liu Z., Xiang J., Wang Y., Song B., Gu X., Guan L., Wei Y., Li H., Wu X., Xu J., Tu S., Zhang Y., Chen H., Cao B. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020; 395(10229): 1054-1062, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736 (20)30566-3.
43. Tsalamandris S., Antonopoulos A.S., Oikonomou E., Papamikroulis G.A., Vogiatzi G., Papaioannou S., Deftereos S., Tousoulis D. The role of inflammation in diabetes: current concepts and future perspectives. Eur Cardiol 2019; 14(1): 5059, https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2018.33.1.
44. Wang T., Chen R., Liu C., Liang W., Guan W., Tang R., Tang C., Zhang N., Zhong N., Li S. Attention should be paid to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the management of COVID-19. Lancet Haematol 2020; 7(5): e362-e363, https:// doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30109-5.
45. Ranucci M., Ballotta A., Di Dedda U., Bayshnikova E., Dei Poli M., Resta M., Falco M., Albano G., Menicanti L. The procoagulant pattern of patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18(7): 1747-1751, https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14854.
46. Song W.C., FitzGerald G.A. COVID-19, microangiopathy, hemostatic activation, and complement. J Clin Invest 2020; 130(8): 3950-3953, https://doi.org/10.1172/ JCI140183.37.
