Научная статья на тему 'Conditions for formation of market income of agriculture as an indicator of agrarian transformations'

Conditions for formation of market income of agriculture as an indicator of agrarian transformations Текст научной статьи по специальности «Сельское хозяйство, лесное хозяйство, рыбное хозяйство»

CC BY
85
11
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Ключевые слова
Interindustry exchange / the conditions for the formation of market incomes / the losses in agriculture due to disparities of interindustry exchange / regional conditions for interindustry exchange in agriculture

Аннотация научной статьи по сельскому хозяйству, лесному хозяйству, рыбному хозяйству, автор научной работы — Dmitrii Komshanov

The necessity of taking into account the conditions for the formation of market incomes in assessing the result of state agricultural programs is justified. The analysis of the conditions for the formation of market incomes of agriculture and losses from their deterioration in Russia as a whole and for the Pskov region in particular in 2006-2013 was carried out. Proposals are made to improve agrarian policy.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «Conditions for formation of market income of agriculture as an indicator of agrarian transformations»

Dmitrii Komshanov, Doctor of Economics, Associate-Professor, The State Agricultural Academy of Velikie Luki

CONDITIONS FOR FORMATION OF MARKET INCOME OF AGRICULTURE AS AN INDICATOR OF AGRARIAN TRANSFORMATIONS

Annotation

The necessity of taking into account the conditions for the formation of market incomes in assessing the result of state agricultural programs is justified. The analysis of the conditions for the formation of market incomes of agriculture and losses from their deterioration in Russia as a whole and for the Pskov region in particular in 2006-2013 was carried out. Proposals are made to improve agrarian policy.

Keywords:

Interindustry exchange, the conditions for the formation of market incomes, the losses in agriculture due to disparities of interindustry exchange, regional conditions for interindustry exchange in agriculture.

In economic science, the search for ways to lead the country's agro-industrial complex away from the current economic situation has long been pursued. Since 2006, the problem of regulation of the agro-industrial complex has been given serious attention at the governmental level. In 2006-2007 the priority national project "Development of the agro-industrial complex" was carried out in Russia. It was replaced by the "State Program for the Development of Agriculture for 20082012". Starting in 2013, the State Program for the Development of Agriculture and Regulation of Agricultural Products, Raw Materials and Food Markets for 20132020 is being implemented. At the same time, the Minister of Agriculture of the Russian Federation N. Fedorov, summing up the implementation of the State Program for the Development of Agriculture and Regulation of Agricultural Products, Raw Materials and Food Markets for 2008-2012, noted that the planned volume of agricultural production was not achieved. With the planned increase in production volumes by 24.1%, the actual growth was 16.8%. Also, the Doctrine of Food Security, which refers to bringing the share of Russian food in retail trade to 70%, has not been implemented. [4, 7-14]

It should also be noted imperfection of target indicators of agrarian transformations. The results of the state program are characterized by the volume of production or the monetary value of production, the volume of loans and state support and the program does not pay enough attention to the profitability of

agriculture relative to other industries, which seriously undermines the motivation of agricultural production.

An objective assessment of agrarian transformations should include an evaluation of changes in the equivalency of interindustry exchange. We believe that the equivalence of interindustry relations for agriculture should be considered relative to their incomes and we suggest using the indicator of conditions for the formation of market incomes, calculated on the basis of the nominal and real structure of the gross regional product. [2, 18-20]

Table 2 shows the dynamics of the indicators of the formation of market incomes in Russian agriculture in 2006-2013relative to 2005, preceding the National project "Development of the agro-industrial complex" (calculated by the author).

Table 2 - Dynamics of the indicators of the formation of market incomes of agriculture in Russia in 2006-2013.

Year Gross regional product by the regions of the Russian Federation (GVA at current basic prices), bln. Rub. GVA of Russia's agriculture, bln. Rub. GRP by the regions of the Russian Federation in 2005 prices (real GRP), bln. Rub. GVA of Russia's agriculture in 2005 prices, bln. Rub. The share of Russia's agriculture in GRP in current prices, %. The share of Russia's agriculture in GRP in 2005 prices,% Conditions for the formation of market incomes of Russia's agriculture relative to 2005.

2005 18034,4 937,8 18034,4 937,8 5,2 5,2 1,000

2006 22492,1 1102,1 19531,2 975,3 4,9 5,0 0,981

2007 27964 1230,4 21152,3 1002,6 4,4 4,7 0,928

2008 33908,8 1559,8 22358 1093,8 4,6 4,9 0,940

2009 32007,2 1568,4 20658,8 1097,1 4,9 5,3 0,923

2010 37687,8 1620,6 21609,1 974,2 4,3 4,5 0,954

2011 45392,3 2133,4 22776 1211,0 4,7 5,3 0,884

2012 49926,1 2096,9 23482,1 1137,1 4,2 4,8 0,867

2013 54013,6 2268,6 23904,7 1192,8 4,2 5,0 0,842

Calculations show that during the years of reforms, the conditions for the

formation of market incomes for agriculture in Russia have significantly worsened.

In 2013, compared to 2005, agriculture received only 84.2% of the generated income.

On the basis of the calculated coefficient of conditions for the formation of market incomes, it is possible to determine the size of agricultural losses as a result of deterioration in the conditions of interindustry exchange (Table 3).

Table 3 - Losses of Russian agriculture in 2006-2013 as a result of deterioration in the terms of interindustry exchange in relation to 2005.

<D >

>

-Q 10 <D u

"O

<D >

<D u <D

<D

E ~ o

u

Q. .5=

m o o

(N

c

<D o

'ÏZ ^ tu 4^

ro c

10 <D

.

JD -S3

-i2

10^ <D o

.

o

o

o <

> (J

3 u

■D <D

4-J

ro <D

o

<D

E o

o <D

10 ro

■D

<D >

<u o <D

<D

E o

o c

m o o

(N

ro <D

c o

-TO <D

c

T3

a)

>

<D

a

a)

VO

(U

E 5,

n 0

o 0

c 2

m ro

(N

>

n

-J

r

tu o

ro

(N

-C +J ID

c

10

a>

10

10

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

o

_1

CL cc (J (U o c

>• (U

o >

10 (U

ai

o

(U

. ro cc

r (U c

(U c ai -S3

tu

(J 10 a)

(- (D u

<J

a) .

o . 5 c

U 0 0 01

2 o

tu C u

ro * —

>4— a)

O o

<

> o o

c

<D

o c

<D (J

tu ro

4—

o <

> (J

<D

-Q Ln

o o

(N

•4—

o 10 c O

T3

c o

o

<D >

+J

<D

10 <D o

-Q

10 ■a

<D 10

o

o >

u c

<J M— •4—

<D

<D >

.

E o u

10 10 o

tu

<D

c o

o

■a o

.

o sz

<D 10

o

o

<D

ro sz 10

<D

<D 3

3 u

tu

3

.

4-J

o

o

<D <J

tu ro

•4—

o <

>

(J o

•4—

o

+J

o ro

•4— 4-»

c

<D

10 <

10 10

tu

<D -

o

<D 10

o

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

o <

> (J

<D

3 i-^ o

-Q

cc

.¡3

o <D 10

10

2005

937,8

100,0

0,0

937,8

0,0

1,840

43,0

1,361

0,0

2006

957,0

98,1

1,9

1123,2

21,0

1,855

41,5

1,355

15,5

2007

930,7

92,8

7,2

1325,5

95,1

1,686

39,0

1,267

75,0

2008

1028,5

94,0

6,0

1659,0

99,2

1,685

38,8

1,266

78,3

2009

1012,3

92,3

7,7

1699,8

131,5

1,858

42,4

1,364

96,4

2010

929,2

95,4

4,6

1699,2

78,6

1,944

48,1

1,454

54,1

2011

1070,5

88,4

11,6

2413,5

280,1

1,718

46,4

1,333

210,1

2012

986,2

86,7

13,3

2417,7

320,8

1,723

45,1

1,326

241,9

2013

1004,0

84,2

15,8

2695,3

426,7

1,722

45,7

1,330

320,8

While determining the absolute size of losses, we took into account the existing distortion in calculating the gross value added in agriculture, because about half of the country's agricultural output is produced by households. For the objectivity of assessing the size of agricultural losses, we proposed an adjustment coefficient for value added, which is based on the methodological principle of equal effectiveness of organizations and households. [3, 92-94]

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

k = 1 + yxx x (kэ -1)

where k3 is a coefficient that shows how many times the efficiency of households according to the system of national accounts is higher than that of non-financial corporations. This coefficient simultaneously shows how many times the efficiency of the household sector is overestimated according to the system of national accounts;

- the efficiency factor of non-financial corporations;

BffC

HK lBBHK ;

/

- the efficiency factor of households;

3flx = BffCflxlBBnx ;

/

- the share of households in the gross output of agriculture.

The developed methodology for measuring the conditions for the formation of market incomes of agriculture can be used not only at the national level, but also at the regional level. [1, 26-32] Dynamics of the conditions for the formation of market incomes of agriculture in the Pskov region in 2006-2013 is presented in Table 4.

Table 4 - Dynamics of the conditions for the formation of market incomes of agriculture in the Pskov region in 2006-2013.

Year Gross regional product by regions of the Russian Federation (GVA at current basic prices), bln. Rub. GVA of agriculture of the region, million Rub. GRP for regions of the Russian Federation in 2005 prices (real GRP), bln. Rub. GVA of agriculture in the Pskov region in 2005 prices, million rubles. The share of agriculture in GRP of Pskov region in current prices The share of agriculture in GRP of Pskov region in 2005 prices, Conditions for the formation of market incomes of the region's agriculture relative to 2005.

2005 18034,4 4342,4 18034,4 4342,4 0,02408 0,02408 1,000

2006 22492,1 4683,3 19531,2 4077,5 0,02082 0,02088 0,997

2007 27964,0 3632,2 21152,3 3918,5 0,01299 0,01852 0,701

2008 33908,8 4983,3 22358 3895,0 0,01470 0,01742 0,844

2009 32007,2 5001,4 20658,8 3801,5 0,01563 0,0184 0,849

2010 37687,8 5833,4 21609,1 3900,3 0,01548 0,01805 0,858

2011 45392,3 6934,4 22776 4134,3 0,01528 0,01815 0,842

2012 49926,1 6775,5 23482,1 4018,6 0,01357 0,01711 0,793

2013 54013,6 6626,3 23904,7 4159,2 0,01227 0,01740 0,705

In 2013, compared to 2005, the indicator of the conditions for the formation

of market incomes of agriculture in the Pskov region was 0.705. If in 2006 exchange conditions for the region's agriculture remained practically at the level of 2005, there was a sharp deterioration later. In 2007, the amount of losses was 29.9%. In the period of 2008-2011, they slightly decreased and stabilized at the level of 14-16%. In 2012-2013 again there was an increase in losses up to 29.5%. Calculations show that the conditions for the formation of market incomes for agriculture in the Pskov region are worse than in Russia as a whole (Figure 1).

Figure 1 - Dynamics of the conditions for the formation of market incomes of agriculture relative to 2005 in the Pskov region and in Russia as a whole. 1,200 1,000 0,800 0,600 0,400 0,200 0,000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

—♦—Условия формирования рыночных доходов сельского хозяйства России относительно 2005 г.

—■—Условия формирования рыночных доходов сельского хозяйства области относительно 2005 г.

Conditions for the formation of market incomes of agriculture relative to 2005 in the country.

Conditions for the formation of market incomes of agriculture relative to 2005 in the Pskov region.

According to our calculations, taking into account the adjustment of the gross value added, the losses in the incomes of agriculture in the Pskov Region from the deterioration of the terms of interindustry exchange amounted to 1108.5 million rubles in 2007, 684.7 million rubles in 2008, 633.1 million rubles in 2009, 670.4 million rubles in 2010, 998.5 million rubles in 2011, 1362.6 million rubles in 2012 and 2179.5 million rubles in 2013. The total amount of agricultural losses in the Pskov region in 8 years amounted to 7.6 billion rubles. (Table 5)

In the years of 2006-2013 most of the state support flew from agriculture to other sectors due to the deterioration of interindustry exchange, which indicates the imperfection of Russia's agrarian policy. In our opinion, it is necessary to reorient state support from subsidizing interest rates to price policy not related to the dynamics of production, while ensuring a certain level of profitability of agricultural production. To combat the monopoly of processing companies, centralized purchases of agricultural products are required, or purchase of contracts for their supply, and then their sale to processors, which will allow fight their monopoly.

Table 5 - Calculation of the relative losses of agriculture in the Pskov region from the nonequivalence of interindustry exchange according to the regional accounts in 2006-2013 relative to year 2005.

Year UVMUI dgl ILUIIUI fc! Ill ZUU3 pi ILfcib L)y ill ULIUI fc! in current prices, million Rub (income received in comparable prices). Obtained revenues as % of those created in year 2005. Losses in income received by agriculture relative to 2005 conditions, % UVHUI dgl ILU 1IU1 c III LU1 1 c III |JI ICtib Uy OrVT structure in 2005 prices (income created in current prices), million rubles. LUbbeb III LI le IJVMUI dgl ILUIIUI fc! Ill CUIimil prices relative to the conditions of 2005, million rubles. Comparative efficiency of households (Data on average for Russia). Share of households in the GVA of agriculture,% (Data of the Pskov Statistical Yearbook) GVA adjustment coefficient of agriculture in the Pskov region Mgl ILUIlUldl lUbbtib, IdWIIg IIIIU dLLUUMl lllti adjustment of the GVA of the household sector of the economy, million rubles.

2005 4342,4 100,0 0,0 4342,4 0,0 1,840 64,5 1,542 0,0

2006 4066,8 99,7 0,3 4695,6 12,3 1,855 61,2 1,523 8,1

2007 2747,4 70,1 29,9 5180,3 1548,2 1,686 57,8 1,397 1108,5

2008 3285,8 84,4 15,6 5907,2 923,9 1,685 51,0 1,349 684,7

2009 3228,1 84,9 15,1 5889,7 888,3 1,858 47,0 1,403 633,1

2010 3344,7 85,8 14,2 6802,4 969,0 1,944 47,2 1,445 670,4

2011 3479,4 84,2 15,8 8239,7 1305,3 1,718 42,8 1,307 998,5

2012 3186,8 79,3 20,7 8544,0 1768,5 1,723 41,2 1,298 1362,6

2013 2932,6 70,5 29,5 9397,9 2771,6 1,722 37,6 1,272 2179,5

Bibliography

1. Komshanov D. Regional analysis of the conditions for the formation of market incomes of agriculture / D. Komshanov, A. Malysheva // International Agricultural Journal. - 2014. - No. 1-2.

2. Komshanov D. Conditions for the formation of market incomes and losses of agriculture / D. Komshanov / / International Agricultural Journal. - 2009. -No. 1.

3. Komshanov D. Formation of market incomes in agriculture (questions of theory and methodology) / DS. Komshanov, A.B. Malysheva, I.V. Mozharova. -Velikie Luki: Publishing house of The State Agricultural Academy of Velikie Luki, 2012.

4. Fedorov N. Accomplishments and plans // Economics of agriculture in Russia. - 2013. - No. 4.

5. Federal Agency of Statistics [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: http://gks.ru, free. - Ver. from the screen.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.