CC BY
37UDC 597.2/.5
ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE FISHES OF NIZHNEVARTOVSK DISTRICT
АННОТИРОВАННЫЙ СПИСОК РЫБ ВОДОЕМОВ НИЖНЕВАРТОВСКОГО
РАЙОНА
©Ovechkin F.
Siberian Scientific Research and Project Institute of rational nature management Nizhnevartovsk, Russia, fuovechkin@mail.ru
©Овечкин Ф. Ю.
SPIN-код: 3287-4590 Сибирский научно—исследовательский и проектный институт рационального природопользования г. Нижневартовск, Россия, fuovechkin@mail.ru
Abstract. The confirmed fishes of Nizhnevartovsk district waters (Russia, Western Siberia, Khanty-Mansi autonomous okrug (district)) comprise 24 species in 19 genera, 10 families, 6 orders and 2 classes found in Middle Ob River basin. There are also 5 species whose presence in Nizhnevartovsk district waters needs confirmation by the described specimens. The most diverse order is the Cypriniformes with 11 confirmed species (45.9%) followed by Salmoniformes with 5 species (20.8%), Perciformes (3 species, 12.5%), Petromyzoniformes (2 species, 8.3%), Acipenseriformes (2 species, 8.3%) and Gadiformes with 1 species (4.2%). Of the 5 introduced species (including three require confirmation), the freshwater bream Abramis brama (Linnaeus, 1758) and the pike-perch Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758) naturalized and are constantly found.
Аннотация. Фауна рыб водоемов Нижневартовского района (Россия, Западная Сибирь, ХМАО — Югра) включает следующее количество таксонов, распространение которых не вызывает сомнений: 24 вида, 19 родов, 10 семейств, 6 отрядов и 2 класса. Кроме того, присутствие еще 5 видов требует подтверждения. Наиболее многочислен отряд Cypriniformes с 11 несомненными видами (45,9%), за которым следуют отряды Salmoniformes с 5 видами (20,8%), Perciformes (3 вида, 12,5%), Petromyzoniformes (2 вида, 8,3%), Acipenseriformes (2 вида, 8,3%) и Gadiformes с одним видом (4,2%). Из 5-ти видов-интродуцентов (для 3-х из которых требуется подтверждение) натурализовались и постоянно встречаются в водоемах Нижневартовского района лещ Abramis brama (Linnaeus, 1758) и обыкновенный судак Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758).
Keywords: annotated checklist, fishes, fauna, Nizhnevartovsk district, introducents.
Ключевые слова: аннотированный список, рыбы, фауна, Нижневартовский район, интродуценты.
Nizhnevartovsk district waters include Ob River (eastern part of the Vakh-Salym subdistrict Middle Ob area Ob-Irtysh basin [1, p. 55]) with tributaries, forming a lake-river system, largest of them are the Sosninski Yogan River basin, Vakh River basin, Vatinski Yogan River basin, Kul'yogan River basin, Urevski Yogan River basin and Agan River basin (Figure).
Because of the central location in the Middle Ob area and opening up the lake-river systems, the Nizhnevartovsk district waters endemic are absent. The fauna of fish basically corresponds to the Middle Ob fish fauna [1, p. 54]. However, there are some of the local features of that characterize the conditions of fish dwelling:
- delayed (swamp) drainage combined with the long period of the rivers under the ice create the conditions under which the second half of winter in the river waters disappear completely oxygen;
- the concentration in the basins of the Vakh River, Vatinski Yogan River, Agan River significant part of oil and gas enterprises.
The described conditions are factors limiting widespread fish species that are susceptible to oxygen content and pollutants dissolved in water, and susceptible to the accumulation of pollutants in sediments.
Figure. Nizhnevartovsk district.
In addition, the presence of fisheries and climate change may also affect the quantitative and qualitative structure of the fish fauna in the Nizhnevartovsk district. For example, downsizing or disappearance of some native species from among Acipenseridae Bonaparte, 1832, Salmonidae Rafinesque, 1815 or Coregonidae Cope, 1872 and penetration of newly introduced species.
The quantitative and qualitative structure of fish populations in the Middle Ob area generally presented in sufficient detail. Her studies in different years were engaged in B. Ioganzen et al. [2], V. Sudakov [3], V. Malkov [4], A. Gundrizer et al. [5], G. Karasev, V. Popkov, D. Pavlov, A. Mochek [1], V. Romanov et al. [7], E. Yadrenkina [8], A. Pavlenko [9], E. Interesova [10], and others. However, we believe that in fact, fish fauna Nizhnevartovsk district waters needs more detailed studies [4, 6].
This paper presents the first checklist of Nizhnevartovsk district fishes including introduced species, with notes on taxonomy, protected status, distribution and type localities.
Table 1.
ACCEPTED SPELLING OF THE SCIENTIFIC NAME
No. Common name Scientific name Source
1 Arctic lamprey Lethenteron camtschaticum (Tilesius, 1811) [14]
2 Humpback whitefish Coregonus pidschian (Gmelin 1789) [14]
3 Prussian carp Carassius gibelio (Bloch 1782) [14]
4 Siberian gudgeon Gobio cynocephalus Dybowski, 1869 [14]
5 Siberian dace Leuciscus baicalensis (Dybowski, 1874) [14]
6 Lake minnow Rhynchocypris percnurus (Pallas 1814) [14], [20]
7 Ruffe Gymnocephalus cernua (Linnaeus, 1758) [14]
8 Pike-perch Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758) [14]
The checklist has been compiled from the works [1-19], as well own data obtained in 1995— 2005. Fishes system and the spelling of the scientific name given according to systematic indexes [11, pp. 8—15; 12, pp. 6—10], (with the exception of see Table 1).
Results
The confirmed fishes of Nizhnevartovsk district waters (Russia, Western Siberia, Khanty—Mansi autonomous okrug (district)) comprise 24 species in 19 genera, 10 families, 6 orders and 2 classes found in Middle Ob River basin. The most diverse order is the Cypriniformes with 11 confirmed species (45.9%) followed by Salmoniformes with 5 species (20.8%), Perciformes (3 species, 12.5%), Petromyzoniformes (2 species, 8.3%), Acipenseriformes (2 species, 8.3%) and Gadiformes with 1 species (4.2%). The most diverse family is the Cyprinidae with 9 confirmed species (37.5%) followed by Coregonidae with 3 species (12.5%) and Percidae 3 species (12.5%). Two families have 2 species. Five families have only one species.
Endemics not represented. Five species require confirmation of their presence in Nizhnevartovsk district. Of the five introduced species (including three require confirmation), the freshwater bream Abramis brama (Linnaeus, 1758) and the pike—perch Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758) naturalized and are constantly found.
Five taxa of the rank of species / subspecies (depending on the researcher's point of view [11, 14, 15, 19]) have in our opinion, the uncertain status (see Table 2).
Table 2.
FISH SPECIES WITH UNCERTAIN SYSTEMATIC STATUS
No. Common name Taxa rank
species subspecies
1 Humpback whitefish Coregonus pidschian (Gmelin 17S9)* Coregonus lavaretus pidschian (Gmelin, 17S9)
2 Sheefish, nelma Stenodus nelma (Pallas, 177З) Stenodus leucichthys nelma (Pallas, 1773)*
3 Prussian carp Carassius gibelio (Bloch 17S2) * Carassius auratus gibelio (Blokh, 17S2)
4 Siberian gudgeon Gobio cynocephalus Dybowski, 1S69 * Gobio gobio cynocephalus Dybowski, 1S69
5 Siberian dace Leuciscus baicalensis (Dybowski, 1S74)* Leuciscus leuciscus baicalensis (Dybowski, 1S74)
* — accepted status.
The distribution of fishes is summarized for each species within Nizhnevartovsk district type localities (Table 3).
Table 3.
DISTRIBUTION OF FISH TAXA IN NIZHNEVARTOVSK DISTRICT WATERS BY TYPE
LOCALITIES
Type localities Families Genera Species Unconfirmed (sp.) Introducents (sp.) Siberian Endemics (sp. / ssp.)
Rivers, incl.: 11 21 25 4 5 6
Ob 1O 2O 24 3 4 6
Vakh 11 2O 24 3 4 4
other rivers б 11 12 O O 2
Lakes 4 1O 12 1 O 2
The greatest diversity is seen in the rivers Ob and Vakh, the smallest in the lakes. Zoogeographically, the Nizhnevartovsk district waters fish fauna comprises representatives of five fauna complexes: Boreal-plain with 10 species (northern pike, Prussian carp, crucian carp,
научный журнал (scientific journal)
http://www. bulletennauki. com
№11 (ноябрь) 2016 г.
Siberian gudgeon, ide, lake minnow, roach, Siberian spined loach, river perch); Arctic-freshwater — 6 species (humpback whitefish, muksun, peled, sheefish (nelma), Eurasian minnow, burbot); Ancient upper Tertiary — 4 species (arctic lamprey, Siberian brook lamprey, Siberian sturgeon, sterlet sturgeon); Boreal-piedmont — 3 species (taimen, Siberian dace, Siberian stone loach) and Ponto-Caspian which 1 species — tench (given by G. Karasev [1, pp. 54-55]).
Checklist
CLASS CEPHALASPIDOMORPHI
Order PETROMYZONIFORMES
(1 family, 1 genus and 2 species)
Family PETROMYZONIDAE Bonaparte, 1832 (1 genus and 2 species) Genus Lethenteron Creaser et Hubbs, 1922
1. Lethenteron camtschaticum (Tilesius, 1811) — Arctic lamprey. Ob River, Vakh River (lower reaches). Rare, anadromous, native. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
2. Lethenteron kessleri (Anikin, 1905) — Siberian brook lamprey. Ob River, Vakh River. Rare, local, native. IUCN Red List Status: Not Evaluated (NE).
CLASS OSTEICHTHYES
Order ACIPENSERIFORMES
(1 family, 1 genus and 2 species)
Family ACIPENSERIDAE Bonaparte, 1832 (1 genus and 2 species) Genus Acipenser Linnaeus, 1758
3. Acipenser baerii Brandt, 1869 — Siberian sturgeon. Ob River, Vakh River. Rare, anadromous, native. IUCN Red List Status: Endangered (EN) A2bcd+4bc. Khanty-Mansi autonomous okrug (district) Red Book Status: 1 category. Endangered.
4. Acipenser ruthenus Linnaeus, 1758 — Sterlet sturgeon. Ob River, Vakh River. Common, potamodromous, native. IUCN Red List Status: Vulnerable (VU) A2cde.
Comment: Acipenser ruthenus marsiglii Brandt, 1833 is the subspecies in the Ob and Yenisei River basins.
Order SALMONIFORMES
(3 families, 4 genera, and 6 species)
Family SALMONIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 (1 genus and 1 species) Genus Hucho Günther, 1866
5. Hucho taimen (Pallas, 1773) — Taimen. Ob River, Lower Vakh River. Rare, potamodromous, native. IUCN Red List Status: Vulnerable (VU) A2bc. Khanty-Mansi autonomous okrug (district) Red Book Status: 1 category. Endangered.
Family COREGONIDAE Cope, 1872
(2 genera and 4 species) Genus Coregonus Lacepede, 1804
6. Coregonuspidschian (Gmelin, 1789) — Humpback whitefish. Ob River. Rare, anadromous, native. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
Comment: Reported from the Middle Ob River (Vakh-Salym subdistrict) by G. Karasev [1, p. 54, Table 1.9], but not confirm by the described specimens for Nizhnevartovsk district.
7. Coregonus muksun (Pallas, 1814) — Muksun. Ob River. Rare, anadromous, native. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
8. Coregonus peled (Gmelin, 1789) — Peled. Ob River, Vakh River, Sosninski Yogan River (one specimen, caught in 2005 from the lower reaches of the Sosninski Yogan River). Rare, anadromous / potamodromous, native. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
Genus Stenodus Richardson, 1836
9. Stenodus leucichthys (Guldenstadt, 1772) — Sheefish (nelma). Ob River, Vakh River. Rare, anadromous, native.
Comment: Stenodus leucichthys nelma (Pallas, 1773) is the subspecies in the Rivers of Arctic Ocean basin. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
Family ESOCIDAE Cuvier, 1816
(1 genus and 1 species)
Genus Esox Linnaeus, 1758
10. Esox lucius Linnaeus, 1758 — Northern pike. Rivers and flowing lakes. Common, local, native. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
Order CYPRINIFORME S
(3 families, 12 genera, and 14 species)
Family CYPRINIDAE Bonaparte, 1832
(10 genera and 12 species)
Genus Abramis Cuvier, 1816
11. Abramis brama (Linnaeus, 1758) — Freshwater bream. Ob River, Vakh River. Common, local, introduced. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
Comment: Abramis brama orientalis Berg, 1949 is the subspecies introduced to the Novosibirsk reservoir of Ob River. Presence in Vakh River needs confirmation. Record from V. Popkov [1, p. 225, Table 3.12].
Genus Carassius Jarocki, 1822
12. Carassius gibelio (Blokh, 1782) — Prussian carp. Large rivers and floodplain lakes. Common, local, native. IUCN Red List Status: Not Evaluated (NE).
13. Carassius carassius (Linnaeus, 1758) — Crucian carp. Lakes. Common, local, native. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
Genus Ctenopharyngodon Steindachner, 1866
14. Ctenopharyngodon idella (Valenciennes, 1844) — Grass carp. Ob River. Rare, potamodromous, introduced. IUCN Red List Status: Not Evaluated (NE).
Comment: Reported from the Ob River by E. Interesova [10, p. 87], but not confirm by the described specimens for Nizhnevartovsk district.
Genus Cyprinus Linnaeus, 1758
15. Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758 — Common carp. Ob River, Vakh River. Rare, local, introduced. IUCN Red List Status: Vulnerable (VU) A2ce. Farmed in Khanty-Mansi autonomous okrug (district).
Comment: Reported from the Middle Ob River by A. Gundrizer et al. [5, p. 320] and from the Vakh River by V. Malkov [4, p. 26], but the presence in Ob River and Vakh River for Nizhnevartovsk district at the present time needs confirmation.
научный журнал (scientific journal)
http://www. bulletennauki. com
№11 (ноябрь) 2016 г.
Genus Gobio Cuvier, 1816
16. Gobio cynocephalus Dybowski, 1869 — Siberian gudgeon. Rivers; flowing lakes of Agan River basin. Rare, local, native. IUCN Red List Status: Not Evaluated (NE).
Comment: Reported from the Surgut depression non—floodplain lakes by E. Yadrenkina [8, p. 101] as gudgeon Gobio gobio (Linnaeus, 1758), but not confirm by the described specimens for Nizhnevartovsk district lakes.
Genus Leuciscus Cuvier (ex Klein), 1816
17. Leuciscus idus (Linnaeus, 1758) — Ide. Rivers and flowing lakes. Common, local, native. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
18. Leuciscus baicalensis (Dybowski, 1874) — Siberian dace. Rivers and flowing lakes. Common, local, native. IUCN Red List Status: Not Evaluated (NE).
Genus Phoxinus Rafinesque, 1820
19. Phoxinus phoxinus (Linnaeus, 1758) — Eurasian minnow. Rivers. Rare, local, native. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
Genus Rhynchocypris Günther, 1889
20. Rhynchocypris percnurus (Pallas 1814) — Lake minnow. Lakes. Rare, local, native. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
Genus Rutilus Rafinesque, 1820
21. Rutilus rutilus (Linnaeus, 1758) — Roach. Rivers and flowing lakes. Common, potamodromous / local, native. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
Comment: We agree with the opinion of E. Tsepkin [11, p. 320], that the assignment of roach from the Siberian waters [7, p. 104; 19, p. 65,] status of subspecies Rutilus rutilus lacustris Pallas, 1814 based on indefinite criteria. Genus Tinca Cuvier, 1816
22. Tinca tinca (Linnaeus, 1758) — Tench. Lakes of Agan River basin. Rare, local, native. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
Comment: Reported from the Surgut depression non—floodplain lakes by E. Yadrenkina [8, p. 101], but not confirm by the described specimens for Nizhnevartovsk district.
Family BALITORIDAE Swainson, 1839
(1 genus and 1 species) Genus Barbatula Linck, 1790
23. Barbatula toni (Dybowski, 1869) — Siberian stone loach. Rivers. Rare, local, native. IUCN Red List Status: Not Evaluated (NE).
Family COBITIDAE Swainson, 1838
(1 genus and 1 species) Genus Cobitis Linnaeus, 1758
24. Cobitis melanoleuca Nichols, 1925 — Siberian spined loach. Ob River, Vakh River. Rare, local, native. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
Order SILURIFORMES
(1 family, 1 genus and 1 species)
Family ICTALURIDAE Taylor, 1954
(1 genus and 1 species)
Genus Ictalurus Rafinesque, 1815
25. Ictaluruspunctatus (Rafinesque, 1818) — Channel catfish. The first record. Known one specimen, catch in 2003 from the Vakh River near Bolshetarkhovo. Rare, local, introduced. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC). Farmed in Khanty—Mansi autonomous okrug (district).
научный журнал (scientific journal)
http://www. bulletennauki. com
№11 (ноябрь) 2016 г.
Comment: The status requires confirmation. Information about the naturalization of this species in Nizhnevartovsk district waters is absent. A possible source of inadvertent introduction is a reservoir of Surgut Power Station on Chornaya River (Middle Ob River basin, Surgut district).
Order GADIFORMES
(1 family, 1 genus and 1 species)
Family LOTIDAE Jordan et Evermann, 1898
(1 genus and 1 species)
Genus Lota Oken, 1817
26. Lota lota (Linnaeus, 1758) — Burbot. Rivers and flowing lakes. Common, potamodromous / local, native. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
Order PERCIFORMES
(1 family, 3 genera and 3 species)
Family PERCIDAE Cuvier, 1816
(3 genera and 3 species)
Genus Gymnocephalus Bloch, 1793
27. Gymnocephalus cernua (Linnaeus, 1758) — Ruffe. Rivers and flowing lakes. Common, local, native. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
Genus Perca Linnaeus, 1758
28. Perca fluviatilis Linnaeus, 1758 — River Perch. Rivers and lakes. Common, local, native. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
Genus Sander Oken, 1817
29. Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758) — Pike-perch. Ob River, Vakh River. Rare, potamodromous / local, introduced. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern (LC).
References:
1. Ecology of Ob-Irtysh basin Fishes. Ed. by D. S. Pavlov, A. D. Mochek. Moscow, T-vo nauchnykh izdaniy KMK, 2006, 596 p. (In Russian).
2. Ioganzen B. G., Petkevich A. N., Votinov N. P., Nesterenko N. V., Podlesni A. V., Tironov M. D. Akklimatizatsiya i razvedeniye tsennykh ryb v yestestvennykh vodoyomakh i vodokhranilishchakh Sibiri i Urala (Acclimatisation and breeding valuable fish in natural waters and reservoirs in Siberia and the Urals). Sverdlovsk, Srednye-Uralskoye knizhnoye izd-vo, 1972, 286 p. (In Russian).
3. Sudakov V. M. Ryby ozer Khanty-Mansiyskogo okruga i ikh biologiya. Rybnoye khozyaystvo Ob-Irtyshskogo bassyna. Sverdlovsk. Srednye-Uralskoye knizhnoye izd-vo, 1977, pp. 43-68.
4. Malkov V. A. Vozmozhnosti vyrashchivaniya tovarnykh sigovykh ryb v ozyorno-rechnykh sistemakh Vakha (The possibilities of growing commodity whitefishes in the lake and river Vakh systems). Biologicheskiye osnovy rybnogo khozyaystva Zapadnoy Sibiri (Biological basis of fisheries in Western Siberia). Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1983, pp. 26-27. (In Russian).
5. Gundrizer A. N., Zalozny N. A., Golubykh O. S., Popkova L. A., Ruzanova A. I. The State of Study of Hydrobionts of the Middle Ob River-Bed. Sib. Ekol. Zhurn, 2000, v. 7, no. 3, pp. 315322. (In Russian).
6. Ovechkin F. Yu. The size and age characteristics of spawning run of whitefish within the limits of Nizhnevartovsk district. Biologichyeskiye resursy i prirodopolzovaniye (Biological resources and nature management): coll. scientific. proceedings. Ed. Yu. V. Titov. Surgut, SurGU, 2001, issue. 4, pp. 23-26. Available at: http://fovechkin.wixsite.com/bookcase/muksun. (In Russian).
научный журнал (scientific journal)
http://www. bulletennauki. com
№11 (ноябрь) 2016 г.
7. Romanov V. I., Petlina A. P., Karmanova O. G., Babkina I. B. Current state of Ichthyofauna in River Tom Basin. TSPU Bulletin. 2011, no. 8 (110), pp. 102-108
8. Yadrenkina E. N. Distribution of alien fish species in the lakes within temperate climatic zone of Western Siberia. Rossiyskiy zhurnal biologicheskikh invaziy. 2012, v. 5, no. 1, pp. 98-115. (In Russian).
9. Pavlenko A. L. Starikov V. P. Cyprinids (Cyprinidae) of the urban and undisturbed areas of the Middle Ob Region. Vestnik KrasGAU, 2015, no. 10, pp. 39-44. (In Russian).
10. Interesova E. A. Non-native freshwater fish species in the Ob river basin. Rossiyskiy zhurnal biologicheskikh invaziy. 2016, v. 9, no. 1, pp. 83-100. (In Russian).
11. Atlas of Russian Freshwater Fishes: In 2 V. V. 1. Ed. by Yu. S. Reshetnikov, 2-nd edition. Moscow, Nauka, 2003, 379 p. (In Russian).
12. Atlas of Russian Freshwater Fishes: In 2 V. V. 2. Ed. by Yu. S. Reshetnikov, 2-nd edition. Moscow, Nauka, 2003, 253 p. (In Russian).
13. Ecologiya Khanty-Mansiyskogo okruga (Ecology of Khanty-Mansi autonomous okrug (district)). Ed. V. V. Plotnikov. Tyumen, SoftDizayn, 1997, 288 p. (In Russian).
14. Eschmeyer W. N., Fricke R., van der Laan R. (eds). Catalog of Fishes: Genera, Species, References. Available at:
http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp, electronic version accessed 10.10.2016.
15. IUCN 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-2. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org, accessed 10.10.2016.
16. Krasnaya Kniga Khanty-Mansiyskogo avtonomnogo okruga — Yugry: zhivotnyye, rasteniya, griby (Khanty-Mansi autonomous okrug (district) Red Book: animals, plants, fungi). 2nd. ed. Ed. by A. M. Vasin, A. L. Vasina. Yekaterinburg, Basko, 2013, 460 p. (In Russian).
17. Opredeleniye effektivnosti raboty rybozashchitnogo ustroystva "PIRS" na vodozaborye NV GRES (The study of the effectiveness of the fish protection system, "PIRS" at the water intake of Nizhnevartovsk thermal power station). Report of research. Moscow, Tver, Research and Production Enterprise "Gidroekologiya", 2001, 57 p. (In Russian).
18. Popov P. A., Popov V. A. Ecology of the dace (Leuciscus leuciscus baicalensis) from reservoirs of the Siberia. Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniya, 2015, no. 1 (50), pp. 403-406.
19. Veselov E. A. Opredyelityel presnovodnykh ryb fauny SSSR (A Guide for the Identification of Freshwater Fishes fauna of the USSR). Moscow, Prosveshcheniye, 1977, 238 p. (In Russian).
20. Bogutskaya N. G., Kerzhner I. M., Spodareva V. V. On the spelling of the scientific name of the lake minnow Phoxinus percnurus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters, 2005, v. 16, no. 1, pp. 93-95.
Список литературы:
1. Экология рыб Обь-Иртышского бассейна / ред. Д. С. Павлов, А. Д. Мочек. М.: Т-во научных изданий КМК, 2006. 596 с.
2. Иоганзен Б. Г., Петкевич А. Н., Вотинов Н. П., Нестеренко Н. В., Подлесный А. В., Тиронов М. Д. Акклиматизация и разведение ценных рыб в естественных водоемах и водохранилищах Сибири и Урала. Свердловск: Средне-Уральское книжное изд-во, 1972. 286 с.
3. Судаков В. М. Рыбы озер Ханты-Мансийского округа и их биология // Рыбное хозяйство Обь-Иртышского бассейна. Свердловск: Средне-Уральское книжное издательство, 1977. С. 43-68.
4. Мальков В. А. Возможности выращивания товарных сиговых рыб в озерно-речных системах Ваха // Биологические основы рыбного хозяйства Западной Сибири. Новосибирск: Наука, 1983. С. 26-27.
научный журнал (scientific journal)
http://www. bulletennauki. com
№11 (ноябрь) 2016 г.
5. Гундризер А. Н., Залозный Н. А., Голубых О. С., Попкова Л. А., Рузанова А. И. Состояние изученности гидробионтов русла средней Оби // Сиб. экол. журн. 2000. Т. 7. №3. С.315-322.
6. Овечкин Ф. Ю. Размерно-возрастная характеристика нерестового стада муксуна в пределах Нижневартовского района // Биологические ресурсы и природопользование: Сб. науч. тр. / отв. ред. Ю. В. Титов. Сургут: СурГУ, 2001. Вып. 4. С. 23-26. Режим доступа: http://fovechkin.wixsite.com/bookcase/muksun.
7. Романов В. И., Петлина А. П., Карманова О. Г., Бабкина И. Б. Современное состояние ихтиофауны бассейна реки Томи // Вестник ТГПУ. 2011. №8 (110). С. 102-108. (На англ.).
8. Ядренкина Е. Н. Распределение чужеродных видов рыб в озерах умеренного климатического пояса Западной Сибири // Российский журнал биологических инвазий. 2012. Т. 5. №1. С. 98-115.
9. Павленко А. Л., Стариков В. П. Карповые (Cyprinidae) урбанизированной и ненарушенной территорий Среднего Приобья // Вестник КрасГАУ. 2015. №10. С. 39-44.
10. Интересова Е. А. Чужеродные виды рыб в бассейне Оби // Российский журнал биологических инвазий. 2016. Т. 9. №1. С. 83-100.
11. Атлас пресноводных рыб России: в 2 т. Т. 1. / под ред. Ю. С. Решетникова. 2-е изд. М.: Наука, 2003. 379 с.
12. Атлас пресноводных рыб России: в 2 т. Т. 2. / под ред. Ю. С. Решетникова. 2-е изд. М.: Наука, 2003. 253 с.
13. Экология Ханты-Мансийского автономного округа / под ред. В. В. Плотникова. Тюмень: СофтДизайн, 1997. 288 с.
14. Eschmeyer W. N., Fricke R., van der Laan R. (eds). Catalog of Fishes: Genera, Species, References. Режим доступа:
http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp (дата обращения 10.10.2016).
15. IUCN 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-2. Режим доступа: http://www.iucnredlist.org (дата обращения 10.10.2016).
16. Красная книга Ханты-Мансийского автономного округа — Югры: животные, растения, грибы. Изд. 2-е / отв. ред. А. М. Васин, А. Л. Васина. Екатеринбург: Баско, 2013. 460 с.
17. Определение эффективности работы рыбозащитного устройства «ПИРС» на водозаборе НВ ГРЭС. Отчет НИР. М., Тверь: НПП Гидроэкология, 2001. 57 с.
18. Попов П. А., Попов В. А. К экологии сибирского ельца // Мир науки, культуры, образования. 2015. №1 (50). С. 403-406.
19. Веселов Е. А. Определитель пресноводных рыб фауны СССР. М.: Просвещение, 1977, 238 с.
20. Bogutskaya N. G., Kerzhner I. M., Spodareva V. V. On the spelling of the scientific name of the lake minnow Phoxinus percnurus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) // Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters. 2005. Т. 16. №1. С. 93-95.
Работа поступила Принята к публикации
в редакцию 15.10.2016 г. 18.10.2016 г.
