CC BY
21
Journal of Qeology, Geography and GeoecoCogy
Journal home page: geology-dnu-dp.ua
ISSN 2617-2909 (print) ISSN 2617-2119 (online)
Journ.Geol.Geograph.
Geoecology, 27(2), 332-336 doi: 10.15421/ 111857
I.O. Sadovenko, O.V. Inkin,
N.I. Dereviahina, Y.V. Hriplivec Journ.Geol.Geograph.Geoecology, 27(2), 332-336
Analyzing the parameters influencing the efficiency of undereground coal gasification
I.O. Sadovenko, O.V. Inkin, N.I. Dereviahina, Yu.V. Hriplivec
National Mining University, Dnipro, Ukraine,e-mail: inkin@ua.fm
Abstract. Relying upon the theory and practice of Podzemgaz stations operation, the Received zu.u/.zuis, paper has analyzed the basic factors working on the efficiency of underground coal gasi-
p • J • ' ri -f /ir /JO O/l / O.
Keceived in revisedjorm uj.ufi.jui8, fication; moreover, it has estimated their function in the formation of gas loss from unAccepted 04.10.2018 derground gas generator. The determined factors have been divided into initial factors
and controllable ones according to their process characteristics and degree of their influence of gasification process itself.The data confirm the dependence of the increased pressure upon the increased heat output. Moreover, high static pressure within gas generator prevents from rock roof caving and reaction channel filling up with molten rock. It has been substantiated that almost all disturbing factors have negative effect on gas calorifity whereas parameters of blast rate increase and static pressure growth in a gas generator have the most positive effect among the controlling factors. Aspects concerning the increase in loss of the produced gas that may reduce economic efficiency and environmental safety of underground coal gasification have been considered as well.
Keywords: filtration and crossflow processes, capacitive parameters, hydraulic fracturing, repression, relaxation, coal gasification
^oc^ifl^eHHH napaivieTpiB, ^o Bn.niBaroTb Ha e(eKTHBmcTb npo^cy nifl3eMHOÏ ra3H(l)iKimiï Byri..H
I.O. Садовенко, О.В. 1нкш, Н. I. Деревягша, Ю.В. Хрипливець
Державний ВНЗ "Нацюнальний гiрничий утверситет", Украта, e-mail: inkin@ua.fm
Анотащя. В данш робота на 6a3i науково-практичного досвщу роботи станцш «Шдземгаз» дослвджено основш фактори, що впливають на ефективнiсть процесу тдзем^ газифiкацiï вугiлля, а також оцшюеться ïx роль у формуванш витокiв газу з пiдземного газогенератора. Встановлеш фактори структурованi по технолопчним ознакам на вихщт та кероваш та ступенi ïx впливу на процес газифжацп. Наведенi данi тдтверджують залежнiсть мiж тдвищенням тиску i збiльшенням теплотво-рення газу. Крiм того, створення високого статичного тиску в газогенераторi перешкоджае обваленню його породил покрiвлi i заповнення реакцшного каналу розплавленою породою.ОбГрунтовано, що практично ва обурюючi фактори негативно впливають на теплотворну здатиiсть газу, а найбшьш позитивний вплив з керуючих факторiв надають параметри збшьшення витрати дуття та пiдвищення статичного тиску в газовому генератора Також розглянуп аспекти збiльшення вiдxодiв виробленого газу, що може знизити рентабельшсть та екологiчну безпеку пiдземноï газифжацп вугiлля.
Ключовi слова: фтьтращя та процеси в покрiвлi, емтст параметри, гiдророзрив, репресп, релаксащя, газифжащя вуг^я.
Introduction. The necessity to make a technique of coal extraction, conversion, and use more ecologically feasible on the crucially new basis, while minimizing the environmental impact and reducing waste volume, is one of the topical problems to be solved by energy sector of Ukraine. Underground coal gasification (UCG) is the innovative solution to the problem. The process relies upon the transition of a mineral into a movable gas-condensate state within its occurrence by means of thermo-
chemical and mass-exchange reactions. Gasification is fol-lowed by the loss of gas, being formed, into enclosing rocks which value is influenced by a number of factors. In this context, gas loss may achieve 30% affecting ecological compatibility and efficiency of UCG significantly. Thus, object of the paper is to study the parameters affecting the process of underground coal gasification as well as gas loss into roof rocks of underground gas generator.
Statement of basic material of the research. Relying upon domestic and the world practices, as well as scientific research (Korolev, 1962, Yefre-mochkin, 1960, Yudin, 1958, Saik, 2018), following basic factors, affecting the efficiency of underground coal gasification, can be singled out: 1) mining and geological environment of the deposit occurrence; 2) amount of water, involved into the gasification process; 3) mineral composition of coal; 4) characteristics of blast delivered to the gas generator; and 5) arrangement of wells. The factors may be divided into controllable (those which can be varied during UCG process), i.e. blast characteristics, and arrangement of wells; and initial factors (which cannot be varied), i.e. mineral composition, and coal seam thickness.
Coal seam thickness, its depth as well as tectonic disturbance of enclosing rocks are among the mining and geological conditions affecting UCG process. Increased seam thickness results in the decreased heat loss in the environment, decreased specific water inflow, and ultimately, in the increased gas heat as well as gasification process efficiency. However, specific gas output lowers due to the decreased seam mining as for its thickness. Thus, according to operation data of gas generators ##5, 5a-b, and 6 of Yuzhno-Abinskaia station of Podzemgaz (Nusinov, 1963), gas heat output, obtained within VnutrennilV seam with 9 m thickness, is 1-1.5 MJ/m3 higher to compare with Vnu-trenni VIII seam with 2.2 m thickness. In this context, specific gas output is less by 1 m3/kg and gasification efficiency of thicker seam is 10-15% higher.
W. m3/T
Fig. 1 Dependence of gas heat output (Q) upon:a - specific water
Changes in characteristics of blast, delivered to the gas generator as well as chemical content of the blast, delivery rate, and delivery pressure are the important factors effecting gasification procedure (Arinenkov, 1960, Inkin, 2018). Analysis of the results of coal seams gasification shows that
Coal seam shallowness results in gas loss through overlying rocks; in turn, significant coal seam depth results in sharp efficiency decrease. Availability of faults, tectonic disturbances, and complicated seam hypsometry troubles the development of a reaction channel as well as control over a combustion source. Less than 100 m depth of a coal seam occurring within undisturbed rocks is optimum for its mining by means of UCG technique making gasification process more stable (Y e-fremochkin, 1960).
In the process of UCG, water balance is formed of natural coal humidity, inflows of water to a gas generator, water, containing in the blast, and water, being formed in the process of carbon, hydrogen, and methane combustion as well as CO conversion. Low water within the coal as well as nonavailability of water inflows may results in moisture lack which will decelerate gasification process; among other things that gives rise to the decreased CO formation during reduction reactions. Much water decelerates coal seam degassing, and reduces heat content of gas, being generated, due to its increased water ratio (Fig. 1). Hence, the amount of water, involved in UCG process, should be controlled strictly depending upon specific conditions.
The main procedures to control amount of water, participating in UCG process, are: preliminary dewatering of a deposit by means of drain wells; increased pressure of the blast to displace moisture from the gas generator; increased oxygen content within the blast; and increased air to be supplied.
co, kg/m3
inflow to the seam (W); and b - gas water content (w)
blast oxygenation increases temperature within combustion area; delocalizes it; and intensifies heat output of the gas, being generated. If oxygen content of the blast to be delivered is two times higher than atmospheric one, then the content of CO and H2 experiences 1.5 to 2 times increase. Water va-
pour with 0.15-0.2 kg/m3 content added to air blast (within the drained deposits) intensifies reduction reactions increasing CO, H2 and CH4 output. Combined use of oxygen and water vapour (i.e. vapour-oxygen blast) is more efficient. A Table demonstrates the influence of blast content on the heat output of the generated gases in the context of different UCG stations.
Experiments, concerning the effect of blast intensity on the gasification process were carried
out within gas generator #1 of Yuzhno-Abinskaia station of Podzemgaz during its different operation periods. To begin with, blast consumption was increased from 1000 to 6500 m3 per hour; then, it was decreased gradually from 6500 down to 1000 m 3 per hour. Fig. 2 explains changes in the content and gas heat output in terms of various consumption of blast delivered for gasification.
Table. Influence of the blast chemical composition on the gas heat output
Blast type Station Gas heat output, MJ/m3
Air blast Lisichanskaia 3.1
Podmoskovnaia 3.6
Yuzhno-Abinskaia 4.6
Oxygen blast Lisichanskaia 5.3
Podmoskovnaia 7.3
Vapour-air blast Yuzhno-Abinskaia 6.3
Vapour-oxygen blast Podmoskovnaia 6.8
a
a
0
1
o o
0 ____
3 4 5 5
Blast consumption, thous. m3/h Fig. 2. Changes in gas heat output 0(1) and its composition CO(2), Hj(3), C02 (4), CH4(5) in terms of various blast types
The graph demonstrates that gas heat output increases depending upon the increase in the blast consumption. Moreover, the increase in heat value depends on carbon monoxide mainly. Carbon dioxide content within the gas reduces moderately while blast intensity increasing; at the same time, content of other components remains constant being more or less independent of the blast consumption.
Experiments have determined (Kulish, 1958) that in addition to the blast intensity, interrupted blast to a reaction channel is one of the factors intensifying heating value of gas as well as the efficiency of UCG station. Fig. 3 represents a graph of changes in gas composition in the context of Gor-
lovka Podzemgaz station. When gasification channel operated with the use of air blast (section A), H2 + CH4 content within the gas was 15-18% in the context of 4.8 MJ/m3 average heating value. After blast was interrupted to the gasification channel, intensive increase in H2 + CH4 content started; the increase continued during the whole blastless period (section B). Then, when blast was restarted, composition of the gas, being generated, varied sharply. After 80 minutes it came up to the level when the channel operated with the use of air blast, i.e. H2+ CH4~ 15-18 % (section C). During blast-less period, the peak H2+ CH4 content was 58%, and heat output was up to 11 MJ/m3.
%
50 40 30 20 10 0
V' \
\ \
A _ __ — -- —■ __ A
* * - . ■ - - - - - - -
... — ¿a _ _ - — - - — - - — - - --- — - _ --- _
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A B C
Fig. 3. Changes in the concentration of gas components (1 - H2, 1 - C02, 3 - CO; 4 - CH4) during blast and blastless periods of underground gas generator operation
Ash washing off coal surface, decreased aerodynamic drag factor, and increased coal loosening are the advantages of pulsating blast delivery. Use of the technique intensifies a process of gas release, and reduces the influence of negative factors arising with uniform blast.
Effect of static pressure within gas generator on gas heat output and loss value was analyzed at Podmoskovnaia station of Podzemgaz during 1954-
1956 (Garkusha, 1964). During the period, static pressure varied significantly; averaged data can help estimate its change influence (Fig. 4). As it is seen in the graphs, increased pressure results in the increased heat output as well as in the increased gas loss. Average 104 Pa pressure increase results in 0.25 MJ/m3 gas heat output increase and in 5% gas loss increase.
50 40 30 20 10
v'
1954
1955
1956
-7 -5.5 -4
-2.5
-1
Fig. 4. Changes in static pressure (P), heat output (Q), and gas loss (V) in Podmoskovnaia station of Podzemgaz
"4
3.5
3
2.5
— Ov
Fig. 5 shows changes in gas humidity depending upon static pressure. Increase of static pressure results in certain forcing out of formation water owing to which moisture content of the gas reduces. The data confirm the dependence of the
increased pressure upon the increased heat output. Moreover, high static pressure within gas generator prevents from rock roof caving and reaction channel filling up with molten rock.
0.6 0.5 ^ 0.4
0.2 -
Fig. 5 Dependence of gas humidity
.5 4 5.5 7
P, 104 Pa
(co) upon static pressure (P)
Conclusions. Thestudies concerningthe factors, working upon the efficiency of underground coal gasification, have shown that perturbing factors are not equal to controlling ones in terms of their degree of influence. All the perturbing factors with the exception of a coal seam thickness have an adverse effect on gas heating power; in turn, blast characteristics are the most favourable ones among controlling factors. Hence, increased blast consumption and increased static pressure within a gas generator are the most active controllable factors working on the efficiency of UCG process. Conversely, that results in the increased gas loss which may decrease both profitability and environmental safety of UCG.
References
Arinenkov D.M., Markman L.M., 1960. Podzemnaya gazifikatsiya uglya [Underground coal gasification]. Donbass: Knizhnoye izdatel'stvo Stalino. 94. (in Russian). Garkusha I. S. 1964. Podzemnaya gazifikatsiya uglya [Underground coal gasification]. Trudy instituta i proizvodstvennyy opyt. Moskva. Nedra. №12, 36. (in Russian).
Inkin O., Dereviahina N., 2018. Study of the migration processes in the roof of an underground gasgenerator. Dniprop. Univer. bulletin, Geology, geography.26 (1), 64 - 70. KorolevI.V., 1962. Zavisimost' protsessaPGUotgeologi-cheskikhigidrogeologicheskikhusloviynakamen-nougol 'nykhmestorozhdeniyakh[Dependence of the UCG process on geological and hydrogeological conditions at coal deposits]. VNIIPodzemgaz, nauchnyyetrudy. Podzemnaya-
gazifikatsiyaugley. Moskva. Gosgortekhizdat. № 8, 64 - 70. (inRussian).
Kulish Ye. D., 1958. Podzemnaya gazifikatsiya pod-moskovnykh burykh ugley [Underground gasification of Moscow brown coal]. Moskva. Ugletekhizdat. 36. (in Russian).
Nusinov G.O., Brushteyn N.Z., Kulakova M.A., Dotsen-ko P.N., 1963. Podzemnaya gazifikatsiya na ob-vodnennykh ploshchadyakh ugol'nogo plasta [Underground gasification on the water-filled areas of a coal seam]. VNIIPodzemgaz, nauch-nyyetrudy. Podzemnayagazifikatsiyaugley. Moskva. Gosgortekhizdat. № 9,85 - 88. (in Russian).
Saik, P., Petlovanyi, M., Lozynskyi, V., Sai, K. and Merzlikin, A., 2018. Innovative Approach to the Integrated Use of Energy Resources of Underground Coal Gasification. Solid State Phenomena, 277, 221-231.
Sotskov, V.O., Demchenko, Yu., Salli, S.V. &DereviahinaN.I., 2017. Optimization of parameters of overworked mining gallery support while carrying out long-wall face workings. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. №6, 34 - 40.
YefremochkinN. V.,
1960.Osobennostirezhimapodzemnykhvodvuslovi yakhgazifikatsiiugleynaShatskommesto-rozhdenii[Features of the groundwater regime in terms of coal gasification at the Shatskoye field]. VNIIPodzemgaz, nauchnyye trudy. Podzemnaya gazifikatsiya ugley. Moskva. Gosgortekhizdat. № 3, 29-33. (in Russian).
Yudin I.D., Grigoryev V.V., 1958. Podzemnaya gazifikatsiya uglya v Kuzbasse[Underground gasification of coal in Kuzbass]. Moskva. Ugletekhizdat, 28. (in Russian).
