CC BY
39
A New Approach to the Stu from the Theory of Integrated of View (Review)
DOI: 10.17691/stm2016.8.4.30 Received April 6, 2016
L.A. Legostaeva, PhD Student, Neurologist, Neurocritical Care; E.A. Zmeykina, Research-Engineer, Neuro-Rehabilitation Department; A.G. Poydasheva, Junior Researcher, Neurologist, Neurophysiologist, Neuro-Rehabilitation
D.V. Sergeev, MD, PhD, Neurologist, Department of Neurocritical Care;
D.O. Sinitsyn, PhD, Engineer-Researcher, Neuro-Rehabilitation Department;
E.I. Kremneva, MD, PhD, Senior Researcher, Radiologist, Department of Neuroimaging;
A.V. Chervyakov, MD, PhD, Senior Researcher, Neurologist, Neurophysiologist, Neuro-Rehabilitation
Yu.V. Ryabinkina, MD, DSc, Leading Researcher, Department of Neurocritical Care;
N.A. Suponeva, MD, PhD, Neurologist, Neurophysiologist, Head of the Neuro-Rehabilitation Department;
M.A. Piradov, MD, DSc, Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director
Research Centre of Neurology, 80 Volokolamskoye Shosse, Moscow, 125367, Russian Federation
The continuously increasing number of patients with chronic disorders of consciousness results in a growing need for an objective method of evaluating the level of consciousness in this category of patients in the clinical practice of neurologists and critical care physicians. One of the up-to-date approaches is based on the integrated information theory (IITC; Tononi, 2004, 2012, 2014). According to this theory the mechanisms determining the state of consciousness are integrally connected with certain conceptually coordinated structures that are closely interrelated with each other, and exist independently of external influences. On the basis of this theory Casali et al. (2013) developed approaches to the quantitative evaluation of integrated information in the neuronal system that depend on cause-and-effect relationships between its different elements. As a result, the term 'perturbational complexity index' has been introduced in respect of consciousness. allows measurement of the integrity and spatio-temporal structure of the pattern of cortical excitation caused by non-invasive stimulation of the brain cortex, and, therefore, a description of the degree of complexity of the electrical signals in the brain. The values of this index differ in various states of consciousness (e.g., wakefulness, deep sleep, anesthesia, vegetative state etc.) that supports its use in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness as a new diagnostic tool.
Key words: functioning of consciousness; minimally conscious state; vegetative state; integrated information theory; neuronal system; transcranial magnetic stimulation.
How to cite: Legostaeva L.A., Zmeykina E.A., Poydasheva A.G., Sergeev D.V., Sinitsyn D.O., Kremneva E.I., Chervyakov A.V., Ryabinkina Yu.V., Suponeva N.A., Piradov M.A. A new approach to the study of consciousness from the theory of integrated information point of view (review). Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine 2016; 8(4): 251-259, https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2016.8A30
Russian
новый подход к изучению сознания с позиции теории интегрированной информации (обзор)
Л.А. Легостаева, аспирант, врач-невролог отделения анестезиологии-реанимации с палатами реанимации и интенсивной терапии;
Э.А. Змейкина, инженер-исследователь отделения нейрореабилитации и физиотерапии; А.Г. Пойдашева, младший научный сотрудник, врач-невролог, нейрофизиолог отделения нейрореабилитации и физиотерапии;
Д.В. Сергеев, к.м.н., врач-невролог отделения анестезиологии-реанимации с палатами реанимации и интенсивной терапии;
Д.о. Синицын, к.ф.-м.н., инженер-исследователь отделения нейрореабилитации и физиотерапии; Е.И. Кремнева, к.м.н., научный сотрудник, врач-рентгенолог отделения лучевой диагностики;
For contacts: Natalia A. Suponeva, e-mail: nasu2709@mail.ru
А.В. Червяков, к.м.н., старший научный сотрудник, врач-невролог, нейрофизиолог отделения нейрореабилитации и физиотерапии;
Ю.В. Рябинкина, д.м.н., ведущий научный сотрудник отделения анестезиологии-реанимации с палатами реанимации и интенсивной терапии;
Н.А. Супонева, д.м.н., врач-невролог, нейрофизиолог, руководитель отделения нейрореабилитации и физиотерапии;
М.А. Пирадов, д.м.н., профессор, академик РАН, директор Научный центр неврологии, Москва, 125367, Волоколамское шоссе, 80
Непрерывное увеличение численности пациентов с хроническими нарушениями сознания обусловливает все большую потребность в объективном методе оценки уровня сознания у данной категории пациентов в клинической практике невролога и реаниматолога. Один из современных подходов основан на теории интегрированной информации (IITC; Tononi, 2004, 2012, 2014). Согласно этой теории механизмы, определяющие состояние сознания, являются непрерывно связанными с определенными концептуально скоординированными структурами, которые в наибольшей степени взаимосвязаны друг с другом и выделяются вне зависимости от качества внешнего воздействия. Основываясь на данной теории, Casali и соавт. (2013) разработали подходы к количественной оценке интегрированной информации в нейрональной системе в зависимости от причинно-следственных связей между ее элементами. Применительно к сознанию был введен индекс пертурбационной сложности (pertrubational complexity index, PCI). Он позволяет измерить комплексность и пространственно-временную структуру паттерна детерминированного коркового возбуждения, которое вызывается неинвазивной стимуляцией коры головного мозга, и описать, насколько распространение электрического сигнала в головном мозге является сложным. Значения индекса отличаются при различных состояниях сознания (например, бодрствование, глубокий сон, наркоз, вегетативное состояние и т.д.), что создает предпосылки для его использования у пациентов с хроническими нарушениями сознания в качестве нового стандарта диагностики.
Ключевые слова: функционирование сознания; состояние минимального сознания; вегетативное состояние сознания; теория интегрированной информации; нейрональная система; транскраниальная магнитная стимуляция.
Introduction. From the point of view of a clinical neurologist or critical care physician the issue of studying consciousness is mainly relevant to fundamental studies in the field of neuroscience. However, professionals in these two specialties are often faced with phenomena of impaired consciousness in their practice [1]. The determination of the presence or absence of conscious activity in patients in a vegetative state (also known as the unresponsive wakefulness syndrome) or in a minimally conscious state can be decisive in a prognosis of the recovery of brain functions. Despite the clear diagnostic criteria of different variants of chronic disorders of consciousness (DOC) [2], their accurate diagnosis is a complex clinical problem. Currently, the clinical evaluation of a patient's status is based on examining their behavioral response to external stimuli and the subjective interpretation of these by the physician, but this approach can result in a high frequency of diagnostic mistakes — reaching 37-43% [3-7]. To avoid this, various attempts to evaluate consciousness with neurovisualization and neurophysiological approaches are being actively developed [8-15]. A clear understanding of current trends in the field of consciousness studies requires a fundamental approach based on the results of investigating the neuronal correlates of consciousness, i.e. dynamic processes corresponding to episodes of consciousness. Understanding consciousness from the point of view of the modern integrated information theory allows practicing physician to better realize the value of the up-to-date methods in the study of disorders of consciousness [16].
Neurology of consciousness. Classic neurology
defines consciousness as a state in which a person is aware of what is happening with him himself and in the surroundings. Consciousness is determined by two components: wakefulness and awareness [17, 18]. Awareness is secondary to wakefulness: functioning of the higher cortical centers is impossible without the operation of the ascending activating system [19].
The level of wakefulness correlates with the ascending activation from the reticular formation as this causes the changes in the rhythms of the cerebral cortex involved in the triggering of global processes such as consciousness [20, 21]. Impairment of the second component — the content of consciousness during wakefulness — is characteristic of the two main variants of chronic DOC: the vegetative state and the minimally conscious state (MCS), which, depending on the complexity of the patient's behavior, can be divided into MCS '+' (plus) and MCS '-' (minus) forms [12, 22, 23].
The vegetative state represents a total impairment of the of cortical functions, expressed in a lack of any signs of cognitive activity, while the vegetative functions are almost completely preserved [24-28]. In the MSC there is reproducible behavioral evidence of self-awareness and of awareness of the surrounding reality [26, 29, 30].
The question of the presence or absence of signs of consciousness in patients cannot, and should not, be based solely on subjective evaluation. It is therefore crucial to determine diagnostic and neuro-rehabilitating approaches for patients with severe impairments of brain of hypoxic or traumatic origin and who are in a chronic DOC state [31, 32]. A study of the neuronal activity
occurring in a state of impaired consciousness can be useful for understanding the process of consciousness both from a fundamental point of view and in the research of possible background for neuro-rehabilitation.
Fundamental approach. Throughout the history of the mankind philosophical attempts have been made at understanding the phenomenon of consciousness and its relationship to the physical body and the world outside. For example, starting with Plato, ideas on the dualism of body and mind have been repeatedly expressed. In the 20th century there was a shift toward the development of specific, empirically testable theories of mental functioning in humans and animals, including of consciousness. The opportunity to generate such theories was a result of the rapid accumulation of experimental data on the functioning of the nervous system on the one hand, and on the other, by the development of artificial informational systems and an understanding of the general principles of how to work with information.
Today one of the most interesting areas of neuroscience is the study of the process of consciousness [33, 34]. With the development of computer technology in the 1940s it became possible to model neural networks and this led to a completely new understanding how to represent neuronal functions through the identification of the significant operating elements and the algorithms of their action [35]. The interest and the originality of this approach, suggested by mathematicians, consisted in the fact that the nervous system could be described as a group of interconnected elements — neurons, and the neural network as a means to summarize any information obtained, transforming it into mathematical functions. Thus, a processor model of brain functioning was proposed. In this model the global processes responsible for the cognitive work of the brain are considered to be the result of the work of neuron ensembles [36, 37]. The presence of a connection between neuron ensembles and the information obtained from the senses questioned the issue of the mechanisms used by the brain for reading and decoding external information.
This system, which presupposes an absence of static processes but the possibility of spontaneous changes in the informational environment, is at the same time both complex and simple. According to Hebb's theory, neurons are trained through changes in the strength of their synaptic connections resulting from frequent stimulation both from outside and inside [38]. This idea combines the classic perception of their physical and chemical properties with new possibilities of complex multilevel changes in the system resulting from interactions (plasticity). The idea arose of new connections that could be combined systematically according to hierarchically performed functions.
A functional and anatomical hierarchy built on principles of brain activity suggests the global nature of its work. However, multidimensional and integrated functions implying pre- and post-processing cannot be realized by a single neuron working as a structural-functional unit of
the nervous system. The framework for complex cognitive processes is not just one, or several neurons, but a complex neural network the operation of which cannot be described by a linear equation [39]. Through natural selection it was possible to unite neurons into organized systems which can recognize and process information of different levels of complexity [40-44]. These organized systems of neurons form neuronal maps. Moreover, such an abstract representation of interacting systems, united in networks, can be transformed into a logical hierarchical structure with clear localization and with the specific algorithmics involved in the formation of the processes of functioning consciousness. In this context, conventional ideas about the structural-functional system of the brain's operation must be reconsidered, being supplemented with new possibilities and principles of functioning. The idea appears of two-levels of registration, processing, storage and use of the information, with ongoing categorization of the perceived impulses distributing them into stable information hubs. Then these hubs, in their turn, are united into a stable dynamic nucleus [45, 46] that combines information flows from outside (through analyzers) and from inside. Generally, if a significant part of the dynamic nucleus loses its capacity for integrating [47], all its activity is impossible. The integration of the elements and the processed information matches the anatomy of the thalamo-cortical system and determines its complexity and the dynamics of its functioning: conscious behavior depends on the interaction between the activating brain systems [29]. These systems combine the cortico-cortical, cortico-thalamic and thalamo-cortical connections which structurally provide dynamic reentry and excitation loops [48]. The thalamo-cortical connections can synchronize excitation in the brain cortex. This thalamo-cortical system is physically uniform, but includes a large number of functionally-specialized elements which are activated selectively [49]. The result of the division into subsystems means that it is possible to specialize the elements and integrate their functions, allowing rapid and effective interaction both within the small elements of neuron ensembles and within the larger system as a whole [50]. This system organization emphasizes both its functional and dynamic specialization as well as the integration of its individual elements, but such a system requires a high level of complexity and is highly differentiated [47]. Modeling of thalamo-cortical interactions [51, 52] can be represented by a uniform synchronization of rhythmic oscillations (in the gamma-range) over time. Excitation occurs during coordination of the functioning of the two loops of the thalamo-cortical system (basic and specific levels), and this is modulated by the brain stem [53]. On the other hand, large-scale rhythmic fluctuations within the cerebral cortex, reflecting the activity of such global processes as consciousness, can act competitively when a more important process of excitation becomes dominant [54].
The neuronal correlates of consciousness are considered to be associated with the connections
between the neurons as these are sufficient for the required information processing [54-58]. This information processing is a key characteristic of the formation of consciousness.
The main approaches to the construction of a quantitative theory of systems possessing consciousness are united by the notions of information quantity [59] and complexity [60]. In the study of the work by G. Tononi et al. [61] a measure of the complexity of the neuronal activity was proposed, this theory being based on the idea of the co-existence of integration and differentiation in the operation of the brain neurons. So, on the one hand, the activity of the brain neurons is fairly differentiated, with single neuron groups obtaining different input signals and having different dynamics of activity. On the other hand, these groups are considerably interconnected at an anatomical level (in essence any two neurons are connected with each other through a chain of just a few synapses, providing a plurality of feedback connections), and at a functional level (there are widespread patterns of activity correlation). In this regard neither the occasional (only differentiation) nor the homogeneous (only integration) patterns of activation have a high degree of complexity. This property only applies to systems with a large number of different patterns in the working of the neuronal connections [51, 62-65].
The theory of integrated information by G. Tononi. A mathematical model of the consciousness process, applied in the clinical and neurophysiological investigation of patients with impaired consciousness, is reflected in the integrated information theory by G. Tononi [45, 6668]. The primary axiom of this theory is fairly simple: it claims that consciousness exists. Then the author gives a number of statements which form the theoretical basis for a mathematical approach to understanding the process of consciousness.
Consciousness is a complex, multicomponent, structured set of combinations of the states of the brain system and its connections under conditions of continuously gained experience [23]. Such obtained experience is specific and exclusive; it is absolutely different from any other experience. The obtained experience is a single whole that cannot be divided into independent components since they are integrated. The states of the neuronal system change selectively due to the work of certain complex hierarchical mechanisms that can generate information under the influence of effective factors. The mechanisms within these states generate integrated information that cannot be divided into multiple independent parts since they use minimal information space for this generation. Moreover the generation of consciousness is exclusive in terms of time, meaning that at any single moment a single state of consciousness dominates.
The integrated information theory suggests that the mechanisms involved in the state of consciousness are continuously connected with specific conceptually coordinated structures which are united with each other
irrespective of the quality of external influence. Each specific mechanism works in accordance with the "cause-and-effect" principle, i.e. its functioning is built as a result of selected alternatives. Thus, the forms of the pairs of cause-and-effect elements are unique and exist only as a result of information integration within a particular state.
The cause of this is the correlation of consecutively observed events that generate a transfer of mutual information from one element to another within the system. At rest, it is impossible to identify the causative element in the system of mechanisms forming such an integrated network of the observed events. However, if the system is excited from the outside, it is possible to build a model of cause-and-effect connections where one of the elements will definitely be an effect, given that the system is unique and integrated [15, 69].
Tononi's work [70] also proposed the concept of determining the integration of information within the system using a search of method that aims to separate it into two parts minimally connected with each other. The resulting value measures the extent to which the system cannot "be further reduced" to the sum of its parts — the theory of consciousness as integrated information is based on this aspect. Thus the suggested theoretical measure of integrated information is based on the cause-and-effect connections between the system elements, rather than on statistical correlation as standard measures of the quantity of information [61, 71, 72].
However, apart from the conceptual counterarguments [73] facing the theory of integrated information, there is the technical problem of finding such integrated information: even for model systems containing not more than a dozen elements, an accurate mathematical calculation is almost impossible in practice [68]. This makes direct experimental verification of the theory extremely difficult. However, studies on a definition of an integrated index of consciousness [74, 75] obtained experimental evidence in favor of the idea of the combination of the integration and differentiation of information within the dynamics of the system as a prerequisite for the presence of consciousness.
Experimental proof of the theory of integrated information. Consciousness unlike other cognitive functions (such as, for example, memory or image recognition) is characterized by an integral subjective aspect: a cognitive process is conscious, if it is realized internally by the individual and is a part of their subjective experience [76]. External observations do not guarantee detection of this aspect and this causes difficulties in verifying theoretical statements about the consciousness process. In comparison, consider studies of pseudo-blindness [77, 78] where patients with an impaired visual cortex were able to carry out tasks that required vision so accurately that it could not be just a coincidence, despite their reporting that they did not have any visual stimulus. Study [79] similarly describes experiments testifying to the possibility of performing unconscious word processing and arithmetic calculations. A subjective component
s
3 -o
3
s
» « s p
s
» p i %
M II
§ I
§
s I
" I
3 I
3
I
i
CD
era
1 S
2
CD
I
° I
S *
ë l
"I
1
to
2 I
?
ço
z
° i IV
wl
wl
ISi
TMS impulse
4HHM» tt IM» (MM)
Modeling of the EEG sources
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Distribution matrix of significant sources
Compression of the matrix by Lempel-Ziv
Calculation of the PCI index
Electrophysiological activity generated by transcranial magnetic stimulation: normal (a), in a minimally conscious state (b), in a vegetative state (c)
M
e
PÖ
o
(X
n H n
M
PO
M (X
M
>
PO n Œ
of consciousness also underlies the philosophical discussions of this problem [80].
To be eligible for acceptance any theory must be tested empirically. Such important issues as the neuroanatomy, neuropsychology and neurophysiology of consciousness usually stop at the stage of searching for the neuron correlates of consciousness. To determine the role of the cortico-thalamic system and the cortico-cortical interactions in the mechanisms of consciousness as well as the presence of dominant mechanisms within the state of consciousness a cause-and-effect approach to the theory of integrated information can be useful.
Its realization became possible due to the combination of a mathematical approach and clinical studies. Progress in the field of neurophysiological and neurovisualization methods of diagnostics enabled a study involving a comparison of healthy volunteers having clear consciousness to patients with impaired consciousness.
Casali et al. [75] developed a quantitative measure based on the integrated information theory [66] that can provide an indicator of the parameters of consciousness-potential regardless of external sensory stimulus, possible motor response or the direct participation of the patient in the study. This measure was named the perturbational complexity index (PCI). It is calculated by analyzing electrical activity responses, generated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and registered with an electroencephalogram (EEG): this parameter measures both the complexity and the spatial-temporal structure of the pattern determined by the cortical excitation resulting from non-invasive stimulation of the cerebral cortex. The physical concept of the index is as an evaluation of the complexity of the electrical signals within the brain. In other words, by measuring electrophysiological activity after TMS it is possible not only to follow the distribution of the signal on the surface of the cerebral cortex, but to indicate the extent of "consciousness" through this distribution. A higher degree of compressibility of the TMS-spatial-temporal pattern of activity presupposes an orderly and "uncomplicated" system, while a lower degree of compressibility indicates the presence of a complex information-rich system of connections in the brain cortex. Thus, it is suggested that in different states of consciousness (for example, in deep sleep, anesthesia, a vegetative state etc.) the index reflecting the complexity of processing an external signal in the brain will decrease compared to the maximum value obtained during a state of wakefulness.
This index is calculated in several stages: 1) the TMS-generated potentials are registered with a 60-channel EEG; 2) solving inverse problem for EEG source of brain electrical activity isolated from the record are localized onto an anatomical image of the brain obtained with an MRI; 3) a spatial-temporal matrix of the sources is binarized with statistical transformations, i.e. SS(x,t)=1 for statistically significant sources, and SS(x,t)=0 for the remainder.
To calculate the PCI index the Lempel-Ziv algorithm is used for compressing the spatial-temporal matrix of the sources [65]. The Lempel-Ziv complexity (cL) approximates the nonredundant information contained in the binary matrix of length L by estimating the minimum number of different patterns required to describe the sequence. The asymptomatic behavior of this measure for a random sequence is LH(L)/log2L, where H(L) is the source of entropy
H(L)=-p1log2(p1) - (1-P1) log2(1-p1)
and where p1 is the proportion of units contained in the binary matrix with length L.
The PCI is defined as the normalized Lempel-Ziv complexity of the TMS-generated spatial-temporal pattern of activity of the brain cortex SS(x,t):
cl=Cl jo&L.
LH(L)
The preliminary results presented by Casali et al. [75, 81] show that healthy people, while unconscious — in a state of deep sleep or under anesthesia (caused by pharmaceuticals such as midazolam, propofol and xenon) — had a considerably lower PCI when compared to that in a state of wakefulness. Furthermore, for patients in a state of minimum consciousness the PCI was higher compared to that in patients in a vegetative state, and this correlates with the data obtained from patients with "locked-in" syndrome, who, as is known, are in clear consciousness.
Thus, the study of consciousness requires an interdisciplinary approach. In particular, the theory of integrated information can be applied to identify conscious activity in patients with chronic DOC (See the Figure). A mathematical calculation of the integrative index of consciousness (PCI) allows not only a description of the degree of complexity of the functioning of the thalamo-cortical system, but provides an opportunity to empirically evaluate the state of consciousness.
Conclusion. Determination of the presence or absence of signs of conscious activity is a complicated clinical task, but the possibilities of using a mathematical approach to modeling the mechanisms of consciousness, in particular on the basis of the integrated information theory, can provide an objective standard in the determination of signs of conscious activity in patients in a vegetative state or in a minimally conscious state.
Study Funding. The work was funded by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation No.16-15-00274 "Consciousness within a framework of integrated information theory".
Conflicts of interest. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
1. van Erp W.S., Lavrijsen J.C., van de Laar F.A., Vos P.E., Laureys S., Koopmans R.T. The vegetative state/unresponsive
wakefulness syndrome: a systematic review of prevalence studies. Eur J Neurol 2014; 21(11): 1361-1368, https://doi. org/10.1111/ene.12483.
2. Giacino J.T., Ashwal S., Childs N., Cranford R., Jennett B., Katz D.I., Kelly J.P., Rosenberg J.H., Whyte J., Zafonte R.D., Zasler N.D. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 2002; 58(3): 349353, https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.58.3.349.
3. Cruse D., Chennu S., Chatelle C., Bekinschtein T.A., Fernández-Espejo D., Pickard J.D., Laureys S., Owen A.M. Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study. Lancet 2011; 378(9809): 2088-2094, https://doi. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61224-5.
4. Childs N.L., Mercer W.N., Childs H.W. Accuracy of diagnosis of persistent vegetative state. Neurology 1993; 43(8): 1465-1465, https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.43.8.1465.
5. Andrews K., Murphy L., Munday R., Littlewood C. Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit. BMJ 1996; 313(7048): 13-16, https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.313.7048.13.
6. Schnakers C., Giacino J., Kalmar K., Piret S., Lopez E., Boly M., Malone R., Laureys S. Does the FOUR score correctly diagnose the vegetative and minimally conscious states? Ann Neurol 2006; 60(6): 744-745, https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20919.
7. Schnakers C., Vanhaudenhuyse A., Giacino J., Ventura M., Boly M., Majerus S., Moonen G., Laureys S. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol 2009; 9(1), https:// doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-9-35.
8. Crone J.S., Ladurner G., Höller Y., Golaszewski S., Trinka E., Kronbichler M. Deactivation of the default mode network as a marker of impaired consciousness: an fMRI study. pLoS One 2011; 6(10): e26373, https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0026373.
9. Ragazzoni A., Pirulli C., Veniero D., Feurra M., Cincotta M., Giovannelli F., Chiaramonti R., Lino M., Rossi S., Miniussi C. Vegetative versus minimally conscious states: a study using TMS-EEG, sensory and event-related potentials. pLoS One 2013; 8(2): e57069, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0057069.
10. Rosanova M., Gosseries O., Casarotto S., Boly M., Casali A.G., Bruno M.-A., Mariotti M., Boveroux P., Tononi G., Laureys S., Massimini M. Recovery of cortical effective connectivity and recovery of consciousness in vegetative patients. Brain 2012; 135(4): 1308-1320, https://doi. org/10.1093/brain/awr340.
11. King J.R., Faugeras F., Gramfort A., Schurger A., El Karoui I., Sitt J.D., Rohaut B., Wacongne C., Labyt E., Bekinschtein T., Cohen L., Naccache L., Dehaene S. Single-trial decoding of auditory novelty responses facilitates the detection of residual consciousness. NeuroImage 2013; 83: 726-738, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.013.
12. Perrin F., Schnakers C., Schabus M., Degueldre C., Goldman S., Brédart S., Faymonville M.E., Lamy M., Moonen G., Luxen A., Maquet P., Laureys S. Brain response to one's own name in vegetative state, minimally conscious state, and locked-in syndrome. Arch Neurol 2006; 63(4): 562-569, https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.63.4.562.
13. Seth A.K., Dienes Z., Cleeremans A., Overgaard M., Pessoa L. Measuring consciousness: relating behavioural and neurophysiological approaches. Trends Cogn Sci 2008; 12(8): 314-321, https://doi.org/10.1016/jtics.2008.04.008.
14. Rees G., Frith C. Methodologies for identifying the neural correlates of consciousness. In: The blackwell companion to consciousness. USA: Blackwell Publishing, Malden; 2007; p. 551-566, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470751466.ch44.
15. Owen A.M. Detecting consciousness: a unique role for neuroimaging. Annu Rev psychol 2013; 64(1): 109-133, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143729.
16. Jox R.J., Bernat J.L., Laureys S., Racine E. Disorders of consciousness: responding to requests for novel diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11(8): 732738, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70154-0.
17. Posner J.B., Saper C.B., Schiff N.D., Plum F. plum and Posner's diagnosis of stupor and coma. Oxford University Press; 2007, https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780195321319.001.0001.
18. Zeman A. Consciousness. Brain 2001; 124(7): 12631289, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/1247.1263.
19. Laureys S. The neural correlate of (un)awareness: lessons from the vegetative state. Trends Cogn Sci 2005; 9(12): 556-559, https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.tics.2005.10.010.
20. Moruzzi G., Magoun H.W. Brain stem reticular formation and activation of the EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1949; 1(4): 455-473, https://doi. org/10.1016/0013-4694(49)90219-9.
21. Munk M.H.J., Roelfsema P.R., Konig P., Engel A.K., Singer W. Role of reticular activation in the modulation of intracortical synchronization. Science 1996; 272(5259): 271274, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5259.271.
22. Wilkinson D., Savulescu J. Is it better to be minimally conscious than vegetative? J Med Ethics 2012; 39(9): 557558, https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100954.
23. Giacino J.T., Kalmar K., Whyte J. The JFK coma recovery scale-revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85(12): 20202029, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033.
24. Cairns H., Oldfield R.C., Pennybacker J.B., Whitteridge D. Akinetic mutism with an epidermoid cyst of the 3rd ventricle. Brain 1941; 64(4): 273-290, https://doi. org/10.1093/brain/64.4.273.
25. Courjon J., Naquet R., Baurand C., Chamant J., Choux M., Gerin P., Lang M., Revol M., Vigouroux R.P. Diagnostic and prognostic value of the EEG in the immediate aftermath of cranial trauma. Rev Electroencephalogr Neurophysiol Clin 1971; 1(2): 133-150.
26. Practice parameters: assessment and management of patients in the persistent vegetative state (summary statement). Neurology 1995; 45(5): 1015-1018, https://doi. org/10.1212/wnl.45.5.1015.
27. Jennett B., Plum F. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. Lancet 1972; 299(7753): 734-737, https://doi. org/10.1016/s0140-6736(72)90242-5.
28. Laureys S., Celesia G.G., Cohadon F., Lavrijsen J., León-Carrión J., Sannita W.G., Sazbon L., Schmutzhard E., von Wild K.R., Zeman A., Dolce G.; European Task Force on Disorders of Consciousness. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med 2010; 8(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-68.
29. Plum F. Coma and related global disturbances of the human conscious state. Cerebral Cortex 1991; 359-425, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6622-9_9.
30. The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state. N Engl J Med 1994; 330(21): 1499-1508, https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199405263302107.
31. Rosenthal D.M. Consciousness and mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
32. Melloni L., Molina C., Pena M., Torres D., Singer W., Rodriguez E. Synchronization of neural activity across cortical areas correlates with conscious perception. J Neurosci 2007; 27(11): 2858-2865, https://doi.org/10.1523/ jneurosci.4623-06.2007.
33. Sherman S.M., Guillery R.W. The role of the thalamus in the flow of information to the cortex. philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2002; 357(1428): 1695-1708, https://doi. org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1161.
34. Seth A.K. The grand challenge of consciousness. Front psychol 2010, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00005.
35. McCulloch W.S., Pitts W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biol 1943; 5(4): 115133, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02478259.
36. Mountcastle V.B. Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic sensory cortex. J Neurophysiol 1957; 20(4): 408-434.
37. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J physiol 1962; 160(1): 106-154, https://doi.org/10.1113/ jphysiol.1962.sp006837.
38. Hebb D.O. The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley; 1949.
39. Searle J. The mystery of consciousness. New York; 1997.
40. Edelman G.M., Mountcastle V. The mindful brain: cortical organization and the group-selective theory of higher brain functions. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1978.
41. Edelman G.M. The remembered present. A biological theory of consciousness. New York: Basics Books; 1989.
42. Edelman G.M. Neural darwinism. The theory of neuronal group selection. New York: BasicBooks; 1987.
43. Edelman G.M. Naturalizing consciousness: a theoretical framework. proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100(9): 5520-5524, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0931349100.
44. Mountcastle V. The columnar organization of the neocortex. Brain 1997; 120(4): 701-722, https://doi. org/10.1093/brain/120.4.701.
45. Edelman G.M., Tononi G. A universe of consciousness: how matter becomes imagination. New York: Basic Books; 2000.
46. Tononi G., Edelman G.M. Consciousness and complexity. Science 1998; 282(5395): 1846-1851, https://doi. org/10.1126/science.282.5395.1846.
47. Tononi G., Sporns O., Edelman G.M. A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91(11): 5033-5037, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.9H 1.5033.
48. Tononi G., Sporns O., Edelman G.M. Reentry and the problem of integrating multiple cortical areas: simulation of dynamic integration in the visual system. Cerebral Cortex 1992; 2(4): 310-335, https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/2A310.
49. Zeki S. A vision of the brain. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1993.
50. Tong F., Engel S.A. Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 2001; 411(6834): 195-199, https://doi.org/10.1038/35075583.
51. Jones E.G. A new view of specific and nonspecific thalamocortical connections. Adv Neurol 1998; 77: 49-73.
52. Tallon-Baudry C. On the neural mechanisms subserving consciousness and attention. Front psychol 2012; 2, https:// doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00397.
53. Llinas R., Ribary U., Contreras D., Pedroarena C. The neuronal basis for consciousness. philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1998; 353(1377): 1841-1849, https://doi.org/10.1098/ rstb.1998.0336.
54. Crick F., Koch C. A framework for consciousness. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6(2): 119-126, https://doi.org/10.1038/ nn0203-119.
55. Crick F., Koch C. Some reflections on visual awareness. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1990; 55: 953-962, https:// doi.org/10.1101/sqb.1990.055.01.089.
56. Crick F., Koch C. Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? Nature 1995; 375(6527): 121-123, https://doi.org/10.1038/375121a0.
57. Crick F.C., Koch C. What is the function of the claustrum? philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005; 360(1458): 1271-1279, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1661.
58. Van Gaal S., Lamme V.A.F. Unconscious high-level information processing: implication for neurobiological theories of consciousness. Neuroscientist 2011; 18(3): 287-301, https:// doi.org/10.1177/1073858411404079.
59. Shannon C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 1948; 27(4): 623-656, https:// doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x.
60. Колмогоров А.Н. Три подхода к определению понятия «количество информации». Проблемы передачи информации 1965; 1(1): 3-11. Kholmogorov A.N. Three approaches to the definition of "the quantity of information". problemy peredachi informatsii 1965; 1(1): 3-11.
61. Tononi G., Sporns O., Edelman G.M. A complexity measure for selective matching of signals by the brain. proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93(8): 3422-3427, https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.93.8.3422.
62. Seth A.K., Barrett A.B., Barnett L. Causal density and integrated information as measures of conscious level. philos Trans A Math phys Eng Sci 2011; 369(1952): 3748-3767, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0079.
63. Kotchoubey B. Event-related potential measures of consciousness: two equations with three unknowns. prog Brain Res 2005; 150: 427-444, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6123(05)50030-x.
64. Ilmoniemi R.J., Virtanen J., Ruohonen J., Karhu J., Aronen H.J., Naatanen R., Katila T. Neuronal responses to magnetic stimulation reveal cortical reactivity and connectivity. NeuroReport 1997; 8(16): 3537-3540, https://doi. org/10.1097/00001756-199711100-00024.
65. Lempel A., Ziv J. On the complexity of finite sequences. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 1976; 22(1): 75-81, https://doi. org/10.1109/tit.1976.1055501.
66. Tononi G. An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neurosci 2004; 5: 42, https://doi. org/10.1186/1471-2202-5-42.
67. Tononi G. Integrated information theory of consciousness: an updated account. Archives Italiennes de Biologie 2012; (2-3): 56-90.
68. Oizumi M., Albantakis L., Tononi G. From the phenomenology to the mechanisms of consciousness: Integrated Information Theory 3.0. pLoS Comput Biol 2014; 10(5): e1003588, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi. 1003588.
69. Mudrik L., Breska A., Lamy D., Deouell L.Y. Integration without awareness: expanding the limits of unconscious processing. psychol Sci 2011; 22(6): 764-770, https://doi. org/10.1177/0956797611408736.
70. Tononi G. Information measures for conscious experience. Arch Ital Biol 2001; 139(4): 367-371.
71. Tononi G. Consciousness and the brain: theoretical aspects. In: Encyclopedia of neuroscience. Adelman G., Smith B. (editors). Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2004.
72. Tononi G., Sporns O. Measuring information integration. BMC Neurosci 2003; 4(1): 31, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-4-31.
73. Cerullo M.A. The problem with Phi: a critique of integrated information theory. pLoS Comput Biol 2015; 11(9): e1004286, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004286.
74. Rosanova M., Casali A., Bellina V., Resta F., Mariotti M., Massimini M. Natural frequencies of human corticothalamic circuits. J Neurosci 2009; 29(24): 7679-7685, https://doi. org/10.1523/jneurosci.0445-09.2009.
75. Casali A.G., Gosseries O., Rosanova M., Boly M., Sarasso S., Casali K.R., Casarotto S., Bruno M.A., Laureys S., Tononi G., Massimini M. A theoretically based index of consciousness independent of sensory processing and behavior. Sci Transl Med 2013; 5(198): 198ra105-198ra105, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed. 3006294.
76. Koch C., Massimini M., Boly M., Tononi G. Neural
correlates of consciousness: progress and problems. Nat Rev Neurosci 2016; 17(5): 307-321, https://doi.org/10.1038/ nrn.2016.22.
77. Leopold D.A. Primary visual cortex: awareness and blindsight. Annu Rev Neurosci 2012; 35(1): 91-109, https://doi. org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150356.
78. Engel A.K., Singer W. Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness. Trends Cogn Sci 2001; 5(1): 16-25, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01568-0.
79. Sklar A.Y., Levy N., Goldstein A., Mandel R., Maril A., Hassin R.R. Reading and doing arithmetic nonconsciously. proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109(48): 19614-19619, https:// doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211645109.
80. Chalmers D. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 1995; 2(3): 200-219.
81. Sarasso S., Boly M., Napolitani M., Gosseries O., Charland-Verville V., Casarotto S., Rosanova M., Casali A.G., Brichant J.F., Boveroux P., Rex S., Tononi G., Laureys S., Massimini M. Consciousness and complexity during unresponsiveness induced by Propofol, Xenon, and Ketamine. Curr Biol 2015; 25(23): 3099-3105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cub.2015.10.014.
