The conuctivity low energy asymptotics for monolayer graphene Текст научной статьи по специальности «Физика»

THE CONUCTIVITY LOW ENERGY ASYMPTOTICS FOR MONOLAYER GRAPHENE

N. E. Firsova

Institut for Problems of Mechanical Engineering RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia

nef2@mail.ru

PACS 02.73

The electron scattering problem in the monolayer graphene with short range impurities is considered. The main novel element in the suggested model is the band asymmetry of the defect potential in the 2+1-dimensional Dirac equation. This asymmetry appears naturally if the defect violates the symmetry between sublattices. Our goal in the present paper is to take into account a local band asymmetry violation arising due to the defect presence. We analyze the effect of the electron scattering on the electronic transport parameters in monolayer graphene. The explicit exact formulae obtained for S-matrix for ¿-shell potential allowed us to study the asymptotic behavior of such scattering data as scattering phases, transport cross section, the transport relaxation time and the conductivity for small values of the Fermi energy. The obtained results are in good agreement with experimental curves which show that the considered model is reasonable.

Keywords: monolayer graphene, conductivity, low energy asymptotics, Dirac equation. 1. Introduction

Recently, much attention has been paid to the problem of the electronic spectrum of graphene (see the review [1]). Its 2D-structure and the presence of the cone points in the electronic spectrum make actual a comprehensive study of the external field effect on the spectrum and other characteristics of the electronic states described by the Dirac equation in the 2+1 space-time. We consider in the present paper the transport phenomena in the 2+1 Dirac equation model of the monolayer graphene due to the short-range perturbation. We do not take into account the inter-valley transitions. Particular attention to this case stems from the effectiveness of short-range scatterers in contrast to the long-range ones: an effect of the latter is suppressed by the Klein paradox [2]. Short-range potential impurities in graphene were considered in papers [3-6]. In [6], for instance, electrons were assumed to be confined in a quantum dot where the dot was represented by a £(2) (r)-potential well. Artificially representing the quantum dot by such a strongly singular potential leads to divergences in the LippmannSchwinger equation. To overcome the problem in [7] the i-shell model was suggested which removed the singularity. The Dirac equation for the i-shell potential is free of such divergences. In [7] a new model of the short-range impurities in graphene was considered where the shell delta function potential form was suggested taking into account for the first time the obvious fact that the Kohn-Luttinger matrix elements of the short-range perturbations calculated on the upper and lower band wave functions are not equal in a general case. This means that the perturbation must be generically described by a Hermitian matrix. In [7] the diagonal matrix case corresponding to a presence of the chemical potential and the mass perturbation was studied taking firstly into account a local band symmetry violation arising due to the defect presence. In [7] for the model the characteristic equation for eigenvalues and resonances was obtained describing their dependence on the perturbation parameters. In [8] in the framework of the

model suggested in [7] the electron scattering was studied and the exact analytical formula for S-matrix was found.

In the present paper we analyze the effect of the electron scattering studied in [8] on the electronic transport in the monolayer graphene. We compare our theoretical results with the available experimental data.

2. The main results

The Dirac equation describing electronic states in monolayer graphene in the framework of the model described above (see [6,7]) reads:

-ihvF^2 Y^d^ - Yo (m + 5m) v2F ^ = (E — V) ^, where vF is the Fermi velocity of the band electron, ym are the Dirac matrices,

(1)

Yo = 03, Yi = Oi, Y2 =

Oj are the Pauli matrices, 2mdv2F = Eg is the electronic bandgap, and ^ (~F*) is the two-component spinor. The spinor structure takes into account the two-sublattice structure of the graphene.

We consider firstly the gapless case m = 0. Then we have

^ = (E - V) ^.

(2)

Y»d» - YoSm v

To treat this equation mathematically, we make (2) dimensionless dividing it by hvFkF.

We get

-¿y] Yßdß - YoSm

ß=i

^ = E - V

Here Sm = SmvF(hkF) 1, E

(3)

V ) is the local perturbation of the chemical potential. A local mass (gap) perturbation, 5m, related to the local sublattices symmetry violation, can be induced for instance by defects in the graphene film or in the substrate (see [8]). We consider here the shell delta function model of the perturbation

E(hVFkF)-1, V = V(hVFkF)-1.

Sin (r) = —bS (r - f0) , V (r) = -aS (r - r 0),

(4)

where V = rkF and V0 = r0kF are respectively the polar coordinate radius and the perturbation radius. The finite radius r0 plays a role of the regulator and is necessary in order to exclude deep states of the atomic energy scale. The finite perturbation radius r0 leads to the quasi-momentum space form-factor proportional to the Bessel function that justifies our neglect of transitions between the Brillouin band points K and K', [9] .The perturbation matrix elements

diag (Vi S (r - ro)

are related to the a, b parameters as follows:

—V = a + b, -V2 = a — b. Solving the Dirac equation (3) in the regions 0 < V < V0, V0 < V < ro and matching these solutions at the circumference of the circle of the radius r = r o, the characteristic equation was obtained for eigenvalues and resonances, [7]. Calculating the ratio of the outgoing and

ingoing waves, the formulae for S-matrix components were found in the angular momentum representation, [8]:

Sj (kro) = -

j (kro) j (kro)!

±3,..., k = E,

2' 2' ' '

where Fj(a) (kro), a = 1, 2, is given by the formula:

(5)

Fj(a) (kro) = I Ij-1/2 (kro) H(+-/2 (kro) - Ij+1/2 (kro) Hj-1/2 (kro)

r(a-)

(a)

T (a, b) (a — b) Ij+i/2 (kro) (kro) + (a + b) Ij-1/2 (kro) Hj-^ (kro)

(a)

1 3

a =1, 2, j = ±2, ±3,.... (6)

Here,

T (a, b)

i tan Va2 — b2 /Va2 — b2 if a2 > b2,

(7)

|tanh Vb2 - a2 /Vb2 - a2 if b2 > a2,

where we choose the principal value of the roots. Since for Hankel functions we have for real

variables H2 (x) = H^ (x) the scattering matrix (5), (6) is unitary on the continuum spectrum = 0. Using the relation [11],

Ij-1/2 (kro) Nj+1/2 (kro) — Ij+1/2 (kro) N-1/2 (kro) = —

n(kro)

(8)

we can rewrite (6) in the form

) (kro)

—(—1)a

2i

n(kro)

—T (a, b) (a — b) Ij+1/2 (kro) (kro) +(a + b) I (kroj-^H)-^ (kro)

(a)

13

a =1, 2, j = ±2, ±3,.... (9)

So the poles of the scattering matrix (5), i.e. the eigenvalues and resonances, are determined as solutions of the characteristic equation

or

13

j (kro) = 0, j = ±-, ±3,

T (a, b) (a — b) Ij+1/2 (kro) Hj^ (kro) + (a + b) Ij-V2(kfo) Hj-^ (kro)

2i •

(10)

n(kro):

22

(11)

Using the relations H,l1) (x) = In (x) + iNn (x), H2 (x) = In (x) — iNn (x), we can write S -matrix (5) as follows:

Sj (kro) = —

Aj (kro) — iBj (kro) _ Bj (kro) + iAj (kro) Aj (kro) + iBj (kro) Bj (kro) — iAj (kro)

j = ± 1, ± 3..... (12)

j

2

Therefore, it can be presented in the standard form:

1 3

Sj (kr o) = exp (2i5j (kVo)), j = ±^, ±2,..., (13)

where for the scattering phases we have

5jBM,- j=±2• ±3■■■■■ (14)

1 3

The functions Aj (kr 0), Bj (kr 0), j = ±-, ±-,... are determined (see (9)) as follows:

Aj (kVo) = —T (a, b) [(a — b) j+l/2 (kVo) + (a + b) I)_x/2 (kVo)] , (15)

Bj (kVo) = 2

n ^ ) — T (a, b) [(a — b) Ij+i/2 (kro) Nj+i/2 (kro) + (a + b) Ij_i/2 (kro) Nj_i/2 (kro)],

13

j = ±-2. (16)

13

Lemmai. Scattering phases 5j(kro),j = ±2,±2,..., of the ^(kVo)-matrix of the Dirac

equation (3) near the Dirac point k = 0, is for low energies (small momentum) i.e. for (kro) " 0 have asymptotics uniformly on a set of j

r ~ n nT (a,b)(a ± b) (kro\2j ri ^ .13

5±j (kro) =--— 1 ^ 2 [ -2°) [1 + o(1)] , kro " 0, j = 2, 2 ... (17)

Proof. From (14)-(16) we see

tan 5j (kV) = ^ ^^ T (a, b) (a — b) tf+i/2 (kV) + (a + b) ljj_l/2 (kV)

x

n kr n

1 + T (a, b) [(a — b) Ij+i/2 (kro) Nj+i/2 (kVo) + (a + b) j_i/2 (kVo) Nj_i/2 (kVo)}

i

1 3

j = ±-.08)

Asymptotic behavior of the scattering phases 5j (kro) at kro " 0 can be obtained expanding the cylinder functions for small arguments (see [11])

In (x) - (1/n\)(x/2)n, n = 0,1, 2 ..., (19)

N (x) i— (r(n)/n)(2/x)n for n> 0,

Nn (X) - i , , s , , /r.s f (20)

\(2/n)log(Yfex/2) for n = 0,

where ye ~ 0,577 is the Euler -Mascerone constant and r (n)is the gamma-function. From (18)-(20), we obtain asymptotic uniform on the set of j

nT (a,b)(a ± b) (kro\2j r_ n . 13

tan 5±j (kro) = i), j 2 ) [ kf) [1 + °(1)], kV " 0, j = ^ 2 .... (21)

Expanding the function tan-1 (tan S±j (kfo) ), kfo ^ 0, we find

nT (a,b)(a ± b) f kfo\2jr_,

S± (kf>= j-1)1]' {T) [1 +0(1)1

1 + oi Mj

1 3

kfo ^ 0, j = -,-,....

2' 2'

13

Hence we come to (17). ■

Let us now define S±j(kFr0) = S± ■ (kfo), Sj (kFr0) = Sj (kfo), j = , ,

j 2 2 the transport cross section can be written in terms of the scattering phases

Etr (kF 'r0) = kF (E J „ ro)

where

(E^ (kFro) = (E1)tr (fcfo) = E [sin j (k^o) - ij (kfo))]

j=± 1 ,± 2,...

'1/ tr V —tr

The transport relaxation time Ttr can be calculated using the following relation:

1/Ttr (kFro) = NiVfV^ (kF,ro).

tr

The Boltzmannian conductivity is determined by the formula

e2

a (#F,r0) = h (EfTtr (kF,ro)/h). Theorem 1. We have for the transport cross section of the problem (2)

V (kF ,ro) = n2T (a, b)2 (a2 + 3b2) kF rf [1 + o (1)] , kF ro < 1.

tr 0

The conductivity for problem (2) for low energies has asymptotics

Then

(22) (23)

(24)

(25)

(26)

where

a = ao [1 + o(1)] , kF ro < 1,

ao = ^ [n2T (a, b)2 (a2 + 3b2) N^2 ]-1.

Proof. From Lemma 1, we see that S±j (kfo) ^ 0, when (kfo) ^ 0, j that expanding, we obtain

1 3 2, 2

(27)

(28)

It means

sin (Sj+1 (kfo) - Sj (kfo)) = (Sj+1 (kfo) - Sj (kfo)) (1 + O (Sj+1 (kfo) - Sj (kfo))2

13

kfo ^ ° j = ± ^, ± 2,

or

13

sin (Sj+1 (kfo) - Sj (kfo)) = (Sj+1 (kfo) - Sj (kfo)) (1 + o(1)), kfo ^ 0, j = ±-, ±-

So we find that (see (23))

2

(EX {k"o)= (EX o)[1 + o(1)] ' kf 0 ^ 0, j = ± 2' ± 2 (29)

(EX (kf'°) = E (j+i (kfo) - ¿j (kr o))2■ (30)

'2/ tr

Transforming (30), we get

(E 2) =2 ) ¿1/2 + ¿-112 - ¿1/20-1/2 - E №¿j+i + S~3Ö~i~l) - (¿1+1 + ¿2-1-1)]

tr I i=12...

Using asymptotics from Lemma 1, we find

(EX = 2n2T(a, b)2 № + 3b2) ((Jk2r) 2 [1 + 0 (1)] ' kro ^ 0.

Substituting this equation into (29), we have

(E) (kro) = n2T (a,b)2 (a2 + 3b2) ^^ [1 + o (1)] , kro ^ 0■ (31)

1 tr 2

Hence using (22) and (23), we obtain (26). From (24)-(26) we see

EfTtr/h = [n2T (a, b)2 (a2 + 3b2) Ntro2] 1 [1 + o (1)], kFro < 1. (32)

And consequently (see (25))

e2 _ 1 a = ~^[n2T (a, b) (a2 + 3b2) N^2] [1 + o (1)], kF r0 < 1. (33)

So Theorem 1 is proved.B 3. Discussion

The results found above were obtained in the framework of the model assuming the delta shell form of the potential (2)-(4). For this assumption to be reasonable, the perturbation radius r0 should be much less than the Compton wavelength (kF)-1 i.e. there should be satisfied the estimate

kFro < 1. (34)

We see that this physical condition (33) of correctness for the considered i-shell model also guarantees the correctness of the obtained asymptotics (26), (27). From the point of view of graphene physics, assumption (33) means that the radius of the circle contains no more than one unit cell of the graphene hexagon lattice. So the principal term in our asymptotics describes the physics well enough. For instance the different pairs (a, b) of intensities satisfying the relation

T (a, b)2 (a2 + 3b2) = C,

with the same constant produce the same conductivity.

Consider now the mobility which can be defined as the ratio

^ = a/(en), (35)

where the carrier density at low temperature is determined as follows:

" = N/S = 2n ()2 (36)

Substituting (33), (36) into (35), we find

» = H-, ^o = ehvF [n2T (a, b)2 (a2 + 3b2) N^o2]-1 [1 + o (1)] , kFro < 1. (37) ef

Notice that the obtained asymptotics for the mobility is in a good agreement with the experimental results published by Bolotin et al. [12].

Consider now the case m = 0. Following the same procedure that we used for the case m = 0, we finally see that the form of asymptotics for mobility greatly differs from that obtained for the case m = 0 and from the corresponding experimental results. Thus, it is clear that in the studied suspended monolayer graphene samples m = 0 i,e., there is no gap in spectrum.

4. Conclusion

In the present paper, using both the framework of the model suggested in [6, 7] and the exact analytic formula for the S-matrix found in [7], we obtained the asymptotics near the Dirac point for scattering phases, cross-section, conductivity and mobility. We found that these asymptotics are in good agreement with the experimental results in the case m = 0, while in the case m = 0, the theoretical asymptotics are very far from those obtained experimentally . This contradiction means that as a matter of fact, in the samples studied experimentally, m = 0. So, the experimental study of the sample compared to our theoretical results clearly indicates whether or not there is a gap in the spectrum.

References

[1] A.N. Castro-Neto, F. Guinea et al. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys., 81, P. 101-162 (2009).

[2] C.W.J. Beenakker. Colloquium: Andreev reflection and Klein tunneling in graphene. Rev.Mod.Phys., 80, P. 1337-1354 (2008).

[3] D.M. Basko. Resonant low-energy electron scattering in short-range impurities in graphene. Phys. Rev.B, 78, P. 115432-115442 (2008).

[4] D.S. Novikov. Elastic scattering theory and transport in graphene. Phys. Rev.B, 76, P. 245-435 (2007).

[5] A. Matulis, F.M. Peeters. Quasibound states of quantum dots in single and bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B, 77, P. 115423-115430 (2008).

[6] N.J.M. Horing, S.Y. Liu. Green's function for a graphene sheet and quantum dotin a normal magnetic field. J. Phys. A. Math. Theor., 42 (22), P. 225301 (2009).

[7] N.E. Firsova, S.A. Ktitorov, P. Pogorelov. Bound electron states in monolayer gapped graphene with the short-range impurities. Phys. Lett. A, 373, P. 525-529 (2009).

[8] N.E. Firsova, S.A. Ktitorov. Electrons scattering in monolayer graphene with the short-range impurities. Phys. Lett. A, 374, P. 1270-1273 (2010).

[9] A. Lherbier, X. Blase et al. Charge Transport in Chemically Doped 2D Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, P. 036808-036811 (2008).

[10] S.A. Ktitorov, V.I. Tamarchenko. About a short-range infusion in the double zone model [in Russian]. Soviet Phys. (Solid State), 19 (7), P. 2070-2074 (1977).

[11] M. Abramowitz, I.A. Stegun. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs And Mathematical Tables, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, 1964.

[12] K.I. Bolotin, K.I. Sikesh, Z. Jiang et al. Ultrahigh electron mobility in suspended graphene. Solid State Communications, 146, P. 351-395 (2008).